Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the conference call of Hindustan Unilever Limited. This evening, we'll be covering the results for the quarter ended 31st December 2024. On the call with me is Rohit Jawa, CEO and Managing Director, and Ritesh Tiwari, CFO. We will start with the prepared remarks from Rohit and Ritesh. We expect this to take around 35 minutes, leaving us with approximately an hour for the Q&A. We will look to end the call by 7:30 PM. Before we get started with the presentation, I would like to draw your attention to the Safe Harbor statement included in the presentation for good order's sake.
Thank you.
Rohit, I'll hand it over to Rohit.
Thank you. Good evening, everyone. Wishing you and your families a wonderful New Year. Welcome to HUL's earnings call for the quarter ended December 2024. I'll start with an update on the operating context and commodity pricing, followed by an overview of our performance and key highlights of the quarter. Ritesh will then present our results in greater detail, share more information on our recently announced acquisition, and round it up with our near-term outlook. Beginning with an overview of the operating context, at the MAT level, total FMCG volume growth has slowed down over the last six months, indicating subdued demand. Within this, urban growth continues to moderate while gradual rural recovery is sustained. Reflective of the current macroeconomic situation, market data for the quarter shows a step-up in the pace of growth for small packs across the portfolio.
This seems to be a transitory shift in consumer patterns due to current macroeconomic conditions and moderation in urban growth. The secular trend of premiumization remains resilient, with premium segment growing ahead of mass segment this quarter. This indicates that consumer needs and aspirations to upgrade continue to evolve, although they are currently opting for smaller packs to manage their overall spends. When it comes to commodity prices, we continue to see a year-on-year inflation in crude palm oil and tea, while soda ash largely remained benign. Crude oil prices continue to deflate during the quarter, and rupee depreciated by around 1% against the dollar. However, significant volatility has been observed in crude palm oil, crude oil prices, and the rupee over the last couple of weeks. As always, we will closely monitor price fluctuations and take proactive actions as appropriate.
We've continued to maintain price agility, pricing in line with net material inflation during the quarter. Net material inflation, or NMI, as you're aware, is the net absolute inflation after adjusting for buying efficiencies and savings. NMI turned positive last quarter, signifying net cost inflation for the business. As against this inflation, we have taken price increases reflected in our underlying price growth. We'll continue to take calibrated strategic pricing actions to ensure we provide consumers with the right price-value equation through inflationary and deflationary cycles. In this backdrop, HUL delivered a turnover of INR 15,195 crores with an underlying sales growth of 2% led by pricing. Underlying volume growth was flat. Our margins have remained healthy despite inflationary and mixed pressures. For the quarter, our gross margin was 50%, while EBITDA at 23.5% was within our range of 23%-24%.
PAT BEI at INR 2,540 crores remained flat year-on-year. EPS grew 19% year-on-year on account of profit from disposal of Pureit business. As you recall, we announced the divestment of Pureit in June quarter 2024, and we have now concluded this transaction. We continue to deliver a competitive performance. As you're aware, over the last year, our Business Winning percentage had temporarily dipped below 60%. In September quarter, we told you that this metric was back to 60. This progress in our competitive position was a result of the actions towards transforming our portfolio underpinned by the strength of our brand and distribution prowess. We are now moving to a metric that provides a more comprehensive and enhanced reflection of our competitive performance known as the turnover-weighted market share. Turnover-weighted market share measures our competitive performance within the footprint in which we operate.
Business Winnings is a binary metric that considers the width of wins. Turnover-weighted market share, on the other hand, takes into account the depth of the share gain or loss, assigning weightages to the individual size of the sales and channels. I'm happy to share that we are continuing to gain turnover-weighted market shares as of MAT December 2024. This competitive performance is a testament to our focus on ensuring fundamentals of the business remain strong. We have now assessed more than 95% of our portfolio using the unmissable brand superiority framework. I'm very happy to report that more than 80% of our turnover is unmissably superior when compared to competition, indicating our continued right to win. We are committed to engaging consumers through our innovative and relevant campaigns across multiple channels and formats.
In this quarter too, we have maintained competitive spending, with our share of awards being higher than our share of market. Our impactful advertising has won us multiple awards at different forums during this quarter. HUL received several accolades at the global MMA Smarties that celebrate exceptional innovation and creativity that have led to positive business outcomes. More than 70% of our business is gaining penetration, indicating that we continue to expand our consumer base, reaching more people than we did before. Our robust business fundamentals will serve as a strong foundation, enabling us to consistently win competitively. Our underlying volume growth comprises of absolute tonnage growth and mix. While absolute volume grew competitively, it was offset by a negative mix. There are a few drivers for this negative mix.
One, home care, which has relatively low realization per ton versus HUL average, has grown ahead of the rest of the portfolio. Second, like what we observe in the overall FMCG market, consumers are prioritizing consumption in the current macroeconomic scenario. This, coupled with the fact that the urban growth has moderated, has resulted in small packs growing faster than other packs. We believe the shift to smaller pack sizes is a transitory phenomenon. Importantly, we continue to witness premiumization this quarter as well, driven by consumer aspiration and evolving needs, and this partially offsets the negative mix. Our strategy is well-equipped to embrace and capitalize this evolving aspiration to deliver consistent growth. I spoke to you about our strategy in the capital markets today.
During this quarter, we continued our journey of sharply investing behind the three pillars of our strategy: focus, excel, and accelerate, while steadfastly upholding our foundational pillars of sustainability and culture. With a renewed approach towards portfolio segmentation, we've categorized our portfolio into core, future core, and market makers, recognizing the various stages of market evolution for each portfolio. We will strategically prioritize investments to optimize each portfolio's contribution to the overall organizational growth. Core brands are the foundation of our categories. Our job is to maintain this portfolio, contemporizing and modernizing it to ensure that the products remain relevant to consumers. Glow & Lovely is a brand with rich legacy. Its high market penetration uniquely positions the brand to influence the broader beauty market. In the backdrop of changing consumer preferences, we have recently launched Glow & Lovely Glass Bright Gel, a mix designed to drive desire and functionality.
With a revolutionary light sensory, the product is packed with potent ingredients of niacinamide and hyaluronic serum. From product, packaging, pricing to promotion, all the six P's have been carefully curated to unlock growth by contemporizing this iconic brand. Bars continue to play an important role in the laundry regime of millions of Indians. We have recently relaunched Rin Bar with a superior formula designed with a novel polymer technology to deliver efficient cleaning and noticeably superior soil wash. The technology enables a product that lasts longer than the key competitor in the segment, delivering improved economy to consumers. The launch response has been encouraging with an uptick in Rin market shares in geographies where the product was launched. Sunlight has kept colored clothes bright since its launch over 130 years ago. The Durga Puja in Kolkata celebrated traditional art inspired by the Las Vegas Sphere.
This one-of-a-kind and memorable spectacle reinforced Sunlight's promise of color care. Amplified across social and digital platforms, the campaign generated significant organic influencer engagement and boosted brand visibility with 13.5 million- views on digital video and a circa 100,000 visitors per hour at the installation over five days. For the past two years, Moti has pivoted towards becoming a social-first brand using digital platforms to engage with younger audiences. For the 2024 Diwali season, Moti launched the Bindaas Diwali campaign with an aim to keep the essence of Abhang and Satsang alive by combining nostalgia with modern entertainment elements. The campaign has garnered 150 million-plus views on YouTube, Instagram, and Moj. The market share of Moti saw one of its highest-ever growths on the back of this campaign. In our future core portfolio, we have identified 10 aspirational brands that we intend to transform into big master brands.
Let me give you a glimpse of our journey in this quarter with Dove. The Dove Scalp Plus Hair Therapy is a perfect fusion of purpose, science, and desire. The collection is infused with high-potency skincare ingredients involving niacinamide and zinc peptides that nourish the scalp and help hair thrive. Dove's new Serum Shower collection combines key ingredients like Pro-Ceramides, unique sensories, premium fragrances, and packaging to provide consumers with a luxurious bathing experience while addressing common skin concerns like acne, exfoliation, and glow. Leveraging Unilever's global innovation capabilities, the product was effectively customized for the Indian market, launching within just nine months after its U.S. debut. Both these ranges have been co-created with dermatologists to bring the pioneering skincare benefits for consumers into India. With premium packaging, communications, digital-first, and other sale-led models, these innovations are multi-year big-bet platforms for premiumization of hair care and skin cleansing.
beauty and wellbeing portfolio, our effort is towards leading and creating trends to develop the market in six segments of choice. Let me talk about some of the actions taken during the quarter. Lakmé launched its Rouge Bloom collection, taking a step towards introducing slow beauty and democratizing prestige with textures, sensory experiences, and color palettes. The launch was preceded with social-first media campaigns, including influencer activation leading to 120 million plus impressions, activations at Lakmé Fashion Week giving 100 million plus impressions, e-commerce activations, large-scale out-of-home media deployments, as well as offline promotions. Recognizing the consumer desire for the long-lasting salon quality hair, the recent launch of TRESemmé's Silk Press range is an at-home hair treatment that is both effective and accessible, providing sleek, smooth results that are safe, affordable, and easy to achieve.
The range has been also launched with a first-of-its-kind social media approach with a 150-plus expert squad, co-creation with e-commerce partners, and demand generation through salons and professional partnerships. Riding the Korean wave in India, Knorr has taken the successor journey of the Korean ramen a step further. Knorr joined forces with Squid Game 2 for a one-of-a-kind campaign where 45 creators showcased their unique take on Dare to Slurp challenge. This is a step towards making Knorr synonymous with Korean food in India. What's more, we also launched a new flavor, Spicy Gochujang, as an extension to the already existing flavors. As market leaders in the dishwash segment, we committed to developing the market by democratizing emerging trends. To this end, we launched Sun, our dishwash liquid brand. Priced at INR 99 per liter, the brand aims to further expand liquid market penetration within the mass segment.
We will continue to innovate at speed across the six identified spaces, bringing in new trends and developing the market to cement a strong competitive edge for us in these high-growth categories. This should give you a glimpse of some of the actions we've taken in this quarter as we remain focused on our job of transforming the portfolio. As a part of this, we have also made certain decisive portfolio choices. Over the last nine months, we've announced the divestment of our water business, separation of our ice cream business, and today, we announced the acquisition of a majority stake in Minimalist and Actives-led premium brand. Ritesh will speak more about this later in the presentation. Our efforts are at keeping our core brands relevant and contemporary, unlocking access to the portfolio of tomorrow, and developing markets for the future. The mid-to-long-term opportunities in the FMCG industry are immense.
With strategic clarity and operational excellence as our foundation, we are well-positioned to leverage this opportunity and grow competitively. I will now hand over to Ritesh to take you through our results in further detail. Ritesh Tiwari.
Thank you, Rohit, and good evening, everyone. Wishing you and your loved ones a very happy and prosperous New Year. Let me take you through our quarter results in detail. Rohit spoke to you about the FMCG consumption trends and commodity inflation witnessed in the quarter. In this context, we have delivered a competitive underlying sales growth of 2% driven by pricing. The impact of higher commodity costs across parts of the portfolio and adverse mix were deftly managed by leveraging the strength of our global procurement operations, landing calibrated pricing actions in the market, and sustained focus on generating savings across the lines of P&L.
Gross margin for the quarter stood at 50%. Our proactive measures effectively restricted the gross margin dilution to 70 basis points year-on-year. EBITDA margin was maintained within the healthy range of 23%-24% while we continued to invest behind our brands and remain competitive in our A&P spends. Profit after tax at ₹3,001 grew 19% year-on-year. Moving on to segment results, home care is our largest segment, contributing 37% to the total revenue. Beauty and well-being contributes 22%, while personal care is 15% of our business. Foods is 24% of our total business. Margins in all four segments remain healthy, with home care at 18%, beauty and well-being at 29%, personal care at 18%, and foods at 20%. Moving on to home care performance, home care has delivered 6% USG driven by high single-digit UVG. Fabric wash delivered high single-digit UVG driven by broad-based performance across formats.
Liquids portfolio maintained its double-digit growth trajectory. During the quarter, Comfort underwent a comprehensive relaunch aimed at further elevating brand superiority. Home Care also delivered a high single-digit UVG led by outperformance in dishwash. As market leaders in this category, we have made strategic choices to further expand and democratize the liquids market with the introduction of a Vim surface cleaner and Sun liquid dishwash. Our consistent investment towards elevating product superiority, delivering greater consumer value, premiumization, and marketing actions to advance brand equity have yielded strong growth for the category. Beauty and well-being delivered a modest growth of 1% year-on-year. In-quarter performance was impacted on account of delayed winter. Hair Care achieved a mid-single-digit UVG driven by broad-based performance across sachets and formats of the future. Within the sachet segment, premium shampoo sachets are growing faster than the mass sachet, indicating a continued trend towards market premiumization.
Our targeted initiatives in emerging formats, including serums, masks, and conditioners, consistently yield positive results. We continue to strengthen our market leadership with value and volume share gains. Skincare and color cosmetics have had a subdued quarter, primarily impacted by delayed winter and masking performance. Non-winter portfolio performed well. We have previously spoken to you about how we are modernizing our mass brand, Glow & Lovely, making it more relevant and desirable for consumers as we expand it across new formats. The secular trend of six big bets and channels of the future leading growth of the category continues. Our focused efforts to expand further our presence in this space have yielded positive results. Revenue for personal care declined by 4%, impacted by decline in hygiene segment of skin cleansing.
Skin cleansing saw a sequential improvement in competitive performance led by strategic actions, and non-hygiene segment witnessed positive momentum in the quarter. To step up the performance of Lifebuoy, we have already initiated several actions to strengthen relevance, purpose, and to contemporize our offerings in the hygiene segment, including a complete 6P relaunch. These initiatives aim to align our product with evolving consumer needs and market trends, ensuring they remain competitive and appealing. We will share more details on this in the upcoming quarter. Body Wash continues to strengthen its leadership position in the market, and strong double-digit performance propelled by multiple innovations over the year. Oral Care has delivered a mid-single-digit growth led by Close Up. Year-on-year, foods category revenue has remained stable, while UVG declined in mid-single digit. Tea grew in low single digit led by pricing actions.
Premium brands 3 Roses and Taj Mahal Tea have delivered a robust performance, driving growth for the categories. We have continued to maintain our value and volume leadership in the quarter. Coffee maintained its double-digit growth trajectory led by price and outperformance in channels of the future. Nutrition Drinks sustained its competitive momentum, gaining both value and volume shares and further cementing its leadership while also increasing penetration. We spoke to you last quarter and in our capital markets day of our commitment towards increasing consumption and fulfilling the nourishment needs across all age groups with superior formulation and taste through nutrition drinks. In this quarter, we have readjusted pricing architecture for our large packs to encourage higher consumption. Further, in line with our strategy to expand our fast-growing adult nutrition portfolio, we have extended the presence of Strength Plus.
Following a successful launch and positive feedback in the East, the product has now expanded nationwide. Packaged Foods has delivered a mid-single-digit growth led by strong performance in future core and market makers' portfolio. Ketchup, mayonnaise, international sauces, and cuisines continue to see strong consumer traction while food solutions maintain its double-digit growth momentum. Ice cream revenue remained flat year-on-year. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate various strategic opportunities for organic as well as inorganic growth, strategic partnerships and investments, divestments, disposals, etc., for furtherance of our business and to maximize shareholder value. After the divestment of our Annapurna salt business, we have continued to drive sharper focus in the business this year by making strategic portfolio choices, including divestment of water business and decision to demerge ice cream business. We have previously expressed our interest in strategic bolt-on acquisitions, particularly within the beauty and food segment.
In alignment with our intent of doubling down on beauty and well-being portfolio, we have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire stake in premium beauty brand Minimalist. This marks another step in the transformation journey of our portfolio towards higher growth demand spaces. Let me spend some time covering this transaction in a little more detail. The sale and divestment of Pureit business was completed on 1st November. As mentioned earlier in the presentation, consideration for this was received and profit was recognized in this quarter. Coming to ice cream separation, I spoke to you in detail explaining the business rationale for separation in our capital markets day. Let me give you a quick update of our progress on this action. Our Board of Directors has approved the scheme of arrangement to de-merge HUL's ice cream business into Kwality Wall's India Limited.
Pursuant to the scheme, one equity share of the new entity will be allotted for every one equity share held in HUL. Upon de-merger and listing of the entity, the entire shareholding will be held directly by shareholders of HUL. This will give us an opportunity for all shareholders to participate in future value creation of the company. Our ice cream category is a high-growth business with several iconic brands. The de-merger will equip an experienced management with greater focus and flexibility to deploy strategies suited to its distinctive business model and market dynamics, thus realizing its full potential. Moving on to our announcement of agreement to acquire majority stake in Uprising Science Private Limited, which owns the brand Minimalist. Before I get into details of the transaction, let me share some information on the brand.
Founded in 2020 by Mohit Yadav and Rahul Yadav, Minimalist is an evidence-based, consumer-focused skin and hair care brand that provides high-quality science-backed solutions. It is one of the fastest-growing digitally-first brands that sits at the intersection of beauty and actives-led science. It's a great brand built on strong business fundamentals and rooted in product efficacy and consumer love. The business has scaled rapidly to cross an annual revenue run rate of INR 500 crores in a short span of four years while being one of the very few insurgent players that have stayed profitable since inception. Let me walk you through the rationale of the acquisition. One, the India beauty market offers great opportunity that we want to capitalize on. Two, this aligns with our BNW strategy of building the number one portfolio for beauty.
Third, Minimalist is a good strategic fit for HUL given the equity the brand brings. And fourth, we are confident in our ability to scale this brand to greater heights by leveraging our complementary capabilities. The Indian beauty market offers significant headroom to grow. To put in context, the overall FMCG market that HUL plays in is about INR 170,000 crores. And of this, beauty is roughly INR 68,000 crores. Within the beauty market, affluent beauty contributes roughly 50% and is growing at twice the pace of the rest of the beauty market. In addition, India's per capita expenditure on beauty is significantly lower versus many other countries. This clearly presents significant headroom for premiumization. Lastly, regimen adoption is already on the rise. The number of products that affluent and affluent-plus consumers use is at par with developed countries.
So if you look at these points in conjunction, there's a large affluent beauty market which will continue to grow ahead of the market in coming years. Coming to our own BNW strategy, you would have seen this chart earlier at our capital markets day presentation when Harman spoke to you of our key pillars of the strategy, one of them being to focus on building the number one portfolio for beauty. As Indian consumers are moving from one-two product regime to five-six product regime, it is essential for us to turbocharge our portfolio, especially in the six big bets that we have identified. These are fast-evolving and high-growth demand spaces where we are making disproportionate investments. This acquisition aligns with our strategic objective of expanding our presence in serums and treatments and sun care in the masstige segment.
Talking about a strategic fit, Minimalist plays in the very attractive affluent beauty market. If you recollect, in our capital markets day, we spoke about strengthening our portfolio in the premium beauty segment where we are currently under-indexed in comparison to the rest of our HUL portfolio. The brand has been able to carve a niche for itself with its consumer through its focus on providing efficacious products for skin and hair care. Through its distinct and sharp positioning, the brand enjoys a strong consumer franchise with high brand loyalty and advocacy. Minimalist is a digital-first brand and e-commerce accounts for a large part of its revenue and, once added to our portfolio, will further strengthen our e-commerce presence. Given our large beauty business and complementary capabilities and expertise that both of the businesses will enjoy together, we expect synergies to come from, one, R&D and innovations.
We have strong global R&D capabilities and product technologies, which we will leverage to further bolster the products and portfolio. Two, Minimalist has a strong online presence. With our wide distribution reach, we are well placed to scale the brand offline. With our curated route to market for beauty in India, our ability to cover the majority of the shops where affluent-plus consumers shop today will increase, making offline expansion a key growth driver. Three, Minimalist has already seeded business in a few international markets. Being part of the Unilever Group, we can leverage Unilever's global presence to expand the business to the right target consumers and markets. Four, supply chain is a core strength for HUL. We have a large supply chain network and are best in class when it comes to supply chain cost.
Leveraging our scale and efficiency, we will be able to unlock capacity and generate margin synergies. Now, let me move on the deal structure. We will acquire a 90.5% stake in the company at a pre-money enterprise value of INR 2,995 crores, subject to closing adjustment as per terms set out in the transaction document. Through a combination of secondary buyout and primary infusion, we have a path to acquire the balance 9.5% stake in two years. So this primary, basically infusion, along with a pre-money enterprise value of INR 2,955 crores, as I mentioned, that's subject to closing adjustment, will be the total acquisition price that we'll end up giving. The balance 9.5% will acquire in two years. Minimalist will join the strong portfolio brands in our beauty and well-being division. The transaction is expected to be completed in quarter one of financial year 2026, subject to requisite approvals.
We are delighted to welcome the Minimalist team into HUL family and are excited to partner with them to unlock the next phase of growth, scaling the brand to greater heights. Additionally, the Board of Directors has approved the acquisition of the palm undertaking of Vishwatej Oil Industries Private Limited. This is a part of HUL's palm localization strategy to build supply chain resilience for palm derivatives through backward integration. With this acquisition, HUL has taken a step forward to build infrastructure for palm under the aegis of India's national mission on edible oils. Moving on, back to our in-quarter performance, let me take you through the summary of our performance. I've already spoken on most of the lines, but let me pick up exceptional items and tax.
Exceptional items include the profit from sale of Pureit business that was partially offset by normative levels of exceptional cost primarily related to supply chain restructuring. Effective tax rate for the quarter was 24.6%. This was lower than the standard ETR as gains from Pureit disposal were taxed at long-term capital gains rate. Excluding the long-term gains, ETR for the quarter was 26.8%. We expect our full-year ETR to be around 25.5% after taking into consideration prior period tax adjustments. Let me quickly take you through our year-to-date numbers for this fiscal. We grew at 2%, taking our nine-month turnover to INR 45,680 crores. Gross margin at 50.4% was down 20 basis points year-on-year. We continue to maintain EBITDA in a healthy range at 23.7%. PAT BEI at INR 7,723 crores was flat, while PAT grew at 6% to INR 8,151 crores.
Coming to our near-term outlook, we expect the current moderation in demand trends to continue. We remain watchful of various macroeconomic indicators that could impact the pace of recovery, such as real wage growth, food inflation, and employment levels. In this context, our focus remains on driving competitive volume-led growth across our business as we continue to transform our portfolio to high-growth spaces. We will step up investments and prioritize them across our core, future core, and market makers portfolio to maximize growth. Activities on ice cream de-merger and the announced acquisition will be executed with agility to bring them to a closure as per timelines. If commodity prices remain where they are, we expect a low single-digit price growth in the near term. Amidst inflationary material prices, we expect to maintain EBITDA at the lower end of 23-24 range.
We will continue to manage our business dynamically to drive savings through our net productivity program and provide the right price-value equation to our consumers. With this, we conclude our prepared remarks and will now hand back to Shilpa to commence the Q&A session.
Thank you, Rohit and Ritesh. With this, we will now move to the Q&A session. We request you to kindly restrict the number of questions to a maximum of two at a time. In case you have any further questions, please join the queue again. In addition to the audio, our participants have an option to post the questions through the web options on your screen. We will take those questions just before we end. With that, I would like to hand the call back to Dhawan to manage the next session for us.
Thank you very much.
We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone. If you wish to withdraw yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to please use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. The first question is from the line of Abneesh Roy from Nuvama Institutional Equities. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks. I have two questions. My first question is on Minimalist acquisition. So in beauty business, you are under-indexed in premium versus the rest of the Unilever's portfolio in India.
So I wanted to understand, once Minimalist, the execution is done, the scale-up in the offline is done, and the synergy benefits, etc., are achieved, say, in the next two years, where do the numbers move in terms of under-indexation. Do you achieve that goal. Second question also on Minimalist, so these are part of the same question, is from a pricing architecture and product portfolio gap, what exactly Minimalist is addressing. Except for the D2C play, I understood the D2C play, but from a pricing and product, is there any gap this acquisition is delivering. And final question on Minimalist will be, why is it profitable from start. Because generally, D2C companies, first four, five years, we have seen that huge losses are there. So what is different here. Could acquisition by a larger company lead to cost dynamics changing in this.
And the profitability initially, could it come under question once the acquisition is done?
Yeah. Thanks, Abneesh, for the question. So overall, at the capital markets day, we have spoken that we are under-indexed on premium as far as beauty and well-being is concerned. And there are many parts of the business which are to be over-indexed on premium, but that is not the case for beauty and well-being. What we want to achieve over the next few years is 900 basis points improvement of portfolio shift towards premium. With that, we will more than cover the gap that we have to a fair share for premium. Minimalist acquisition makes a big step in that direction.
We are very confident in that with Minimalist, with our extension of portfolio within Ponds and Lakmé, further scaling our brand, Simple, Love Beauty and Planet, entering into prestige space, scaling Novology that we launched a few months ago, and many such actions put together, we will be able to drive the 900 basis points portfolio shift towards premium and more than close the gap that we have to fair share within the premium segment of beauty and well-being. Now, when it comes to your question on where does this fit, so Minimalist sits at a masstige price point, number one. Number two, it has a very strong play online and hence in e-commerce across e-retail platforms, apart from direct-to-consumer sales. It operates in derma actives-led space.
If I look at overall beauty and well-being, the point we mentioned in our prepared remarks, that half of the business of the overall category in the market sits with a consumer cohort of Affluent and Affluent Plus. Within that, masstige is a pretty strong segment. Overall, this Affluent and Affluent Plus cohort, the growth of that segment of market is twice than the overall average of the business. The derma actives-led business is almost two-thirds of this masstige market segment, which is why this makes an absolutely fabulous strategic fit that we are able to now participate in masstige. Two-thirds of that, as I mentioned, sits in derma actives-led, which is exactly what Minimalist is all about, deeply rooted in product efficacy and consumer love. With this, we get our play gets more stronger in e-commerce.
Now, when it comes to business, you rightly captured this in the prepared remarks that over four years' time, Minimalist has become a 500-crore annual run rate business and has been profitable from year one. It's a very tight and smart, well-managed business model, the way the brand has been crafted meaningfully, the way business model is very efficient across all the lines of the P&L, the way marketing spends have been done, and more importantly, innovation rate. Business has been innovating very well, and there have been successful innovations which have kept getting added year on year. So it has been a mindful innovation rate with more successful product and hence a very mindful P&L model which has got deployed. Now, going forward, what do we see from here? As I mentioned, there are multiple synergies Abneesh will end up having.
Our global R&D capability and technology will be able to deploy to the brand. Supply chain capacity unlock, supply chain savings, and synergies unlock will be able to bring to play. We will be able to leverage our offline presence and our strong go-to-market structure to take the brands to more premium stores across the country, and we had spoken about in our capital markets day, we have now a separate sales force called Beauty Pro, which basically caters to outlets which are premium beauty outlets across the country, and we will take Minimalist brands offline into those markets over the course of time, and equally, we will leverage our global presence at Unilever to evaluate and explore international opportunities.
So all these four elements put together, we'll be able to create more value by working with Team Minimalist and bringing capabilities of both the teams together and then create brand bigger compared to what it is today and make business model more stronger compared to today. It's already strong, but we'll be able to make more stronger. So those are the rationale of profitability and business model Abneesh going forward.
Sure. That's useful. My second and last question will be on the two good categories in terms of volumes. One is dishwash and detergent. Here, if I see high single-digit volume growth, of course, industry should not be growing at that level given the urban slowdown. So where is the market share gain coming in these two specific segments? Is it from the larger national players? And here, the urban growth for you, is it decent?
My sense is it should be decent, but if you could comment from where the market share gains are happening, and once this market share gain eases off when it comes in the base, etc., then if you could comment in terms of growth, how do you see these two specific categories?
We see growth, Abneesh, Rohit. We're seeing growth on, first of all, so Homecare has broad-based growth. As you rightly said, the growth is in fabric cleaning, fabric conditioners, and dishwash. We also have volume-led growth in hair care. We also have volume-led growth in non-prestige skin. We also have volume-led growth in our future market makers, so in skin as well, and premium personal wash and premium tea. So the volume growth is not just narrowed specifically to one sort of category. Of course, it's way more robust in Homecare.
Just to give you context, the fact that we are winning competitively by volume because we have many categories that are going ahead of the market. Now, coming specifically to Homecare, this is a category where the growth is driven by a great portfolio, especially a portfolio that's got a good presence in premium Surf Excel. And here's also the category where we entered the liquids market quite aggressively, both in fabric cleaning and in dishwash. We launched brands to serve all price segments like Rin and Sun. So we have many levers of growth, not just driven by the overall premiumization agenda of this category, but also driven by the fact that we're filling white spaces and premiumizing categories. So all levers of growth in Homecare are firing. So I don't think this is a specific event of a quarter. It's just generally the strategy is delivering.
So that's basically the underlying trend of homecare business. If I probably just add to what Rohit mentioned, Abneesh, we have experienced homecare typically is a very resilient category as an industry to economic realities in times of inflation, in times of deflation. Being an essential commodity, essential product, consumers do use it. Even at the peak of inflation during 2022, we drove positive volume growth from the category. Unlike, for example, if you look at tea or skin cleansing, they are elastic to price increases and economic realities, unlike homecare. Homecare, to Rohit's point, we also have a portfolio which is over-indexed to premium. And hence, we also have tailwind the way we have crafted the portfolio, which also gives us more amount of growth opportunities. Just one added flavor to this, in fact, looking at the pack mix changes this quarter across categories.
For the market largest for HUL, it's quite important to note that homecare did not see that much of pack mix downsizing or titration that we've seen across other categories. And the more discretionary the category is, the more titration to small packs one is observing. So clearly, when you go from essentials, which is the homecare business, to more discretionary categories, the behavior of consumers to titrate to smaller packs seems to be increasing. Therefore, in that sense, I think the resilient nature of the category, plus the stronger portfolio, plus the fact that we have very large-scale access packs available in INR 10 Surf Excel, for instance, and we're getting into liquid sachets as well, makes it somewhat more resilient to different cycles as compared to, say, skincare or tea or nutrition, to name a few.
Just one follow-up here, Rohit.
In terms of skin cleansing and, say, fabric wash, a lot of things can be common. And customers, especially when something he's putting on his skin versus, say, on fabric, generally, from a logic perspective, the brand loyalty should be higher. My question on skin cleansing is not in terms of this quarter. I understand price hikes were taken, so the customer pushback is always there. But in terms of skin cleansing, do you need a much bigger play in terms of liquids? Because here, we do understand that local players in skin cleansing in the last 10 years have reduced. So it's not that competition has turned worse. But in detergent, clearly, your liquid play and your aggression clearly is leading to a lot of positive benefits.
In skin cleansing, say, two, three quarters down the line when the stability will come in terms of, say, pricing, what prevents high single-digit volume growth in skin cleansing?
So skin cleansing, actually, we are getting increasingly confident of the fact that all our efforts that we spoke about three, four quarters back are beginning to fire. To start with, at the very top, our actions and our portfolio play in skin cleansing, the innovations, liquids is working. We are gaining shares, growing quite handsomely. And what happened in homecare liquids is also going to happen in bathing market because it's happened in every other category. So we are now leading the game in body wash. We see our premium brands like Dove and Pears have very strong equities. Pears is a very solid brand, growing consistently even by volume in these circumstances.
Dove is getting immense amount of innovation support from us. Excellent brand. I believe it could be way bigger than its current scale, and we're working on that too, including investment marketing quality. Lux is basically the hero of our category. It's done quite well with Stratos and even the Sandalwear variant that we launched is showing good promise. We see Lux as a master brand. It's gaining share. The job we have to do in skin cleansing now really is to address our hygiene segment, a play where the segment is declining. We're holding share in it, but it's so large for us that we need to make sure that our brand Lifebuoy goes back to growth, is vibrant, and we started shipping a relaunch pack as we speak.
We have a very sort of ambitious plans to make Lifebuoy a fully full-service range with core and new benefit spaces and really make it very contemporary. So Lifebuoy is one. And when that comes to play, I think we will be back in rhythm. Insofar as volumes are concerned, they're linked to price for sure because as prices have gone up, we've had to cut grammages and smaller pack sizes. So all of that impacts volume. For some, while as prices go up because of high palm costs, there will be some impact on volume. But even in this quarter, for instance, like I said, except Lifebuoy, we've seen generally good, robust stability and growth in the rest of the portfolio in personal wash.
Sure. Thanks. That's all from my side. Thank you.
Thanks, Abneesh.
Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Jay Doshi from Kotak. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity. Would you be able to call out what is your base case expectation for Minimalist over the next two, three years, whatever targets and milestones you may have?
Yeah. So I will not share any specific numbers, Jay, but let me just give a little bit of articulation. As I mentioned that this business overall sits at masstige price point and in the actives-led space, which is a very attractive space because two-thirds of the market of masstige sits in there. So definitely be high growth. And today, our own six bets within Beauty and Wellbeing we called out grows at high single-digit. And that portfolio of market might be that, but our own business grows at strong double-digit.
And when it comes to Minimalist, very sharp brand crafted and extremely successful, we do expect high growth from the business to come, especially when we start bringing synergies that I was talking about to Abneesh earlier. Synergies of offline expansion into GT, synergies of international expansion, equally bringing synergies on cost front to drive profitability with supply chain, with overall cost structure and leverage that we'll end up getting. So we do expect that as we bring the business together and work as Team HUL and Team Minimalist over a couple of years, we'll start realizing the synergies to drive both top-line and bottom-line growth. The masstige segment purchase will attract to the point I've mentioned earlier. The masstige segment today grows at twice the pace than overall B&W.
So that also helps us to ensure that we're able to have the play and then are able to grow it pretty well. So that's how I would want you to see it.
Sure. Thank you. And second is your segmental margins, both for personal care and foods have expanded, notwithstanding 24%, 40% inflation and what we are seeing in your peer group. So could you please help us understand what's helping you maintain margins for these segments?
Yeah. See, F&R margins are effectively the first nine months of this financial year is at 19%. And for a quarter, the number can go a little up and down depending upon what plays out in the quarter. And we believe that margin range of 19%-20% is pretty healthy for a foods business.
When it comes to personal care, again, if I put a nine-month margin number, it's at 17.2%. Again, at a 17%-18% margin band, I think is a pretty healthy margin for a personal care business. So we do believe that we have the right margin profile. And our job always is, within the lines of the P&L, drive higher gross margin. But then that creates capacity for us in the P&L to invest behind the brand, be it advertising, sales, and sales promotion, or for that matter, capabilities within the lines of other expenses. So that's how we want to drive business model for personal care and F&R. And the totality of the margin outlook for Hindustan Unilever, the way we want to drive is improvement mixed-led and leverage-led. So that's what is the overall margin model in terms of improvement for Hindustan Unilever.
But when it comes to PC and F&R, I think we're pretty happy where the current healthy margin levels are. And our priority for both foods and personal care is to drive top-line growth. Understood.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Manoj Menon from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, team. Thanks for higher disclosures this time. Just one clarification. Team, actually, on the comment about absolute volumes outperforming the UVG aspect that you also called out, it's not a home care driven. It's actually non-home care. The context of this question is over the last, let's say, four quarters or maybe three, definitely this fiscal, at least the perception was, let's say, macros or the bottom of the pyramid consumption should get better.
Probably this is the first time in a while it seems you're actually calling out a deceleration or a deterioration. Is that the right interpretation?
I think no. No. I think, first of all, rural is stronger. So in that sense, that's a big part of the population consumer base that is stronger and is getting better. And that does consume largely small packs and lower-tier brands in terms of price points. Urban,
yes.
The real issue there is we see more recently demand compression. And importantly, this quarter, we've seen titration from large packs to small packs across categories, especially the more discretionary the category is, more titration there is, less so in home care. We have actually grown in volumes because, as you know, UVG is what we normally report, and it's a combination of volume and mix.
We have sustained growth consistently over three quarters by volume, well ahead of the market. We've gained competitive volume share at all time frames, and it's led by categories which have got high volume salience, such as home care, hair care, to name a few, and therefore, I don't think that the takeout you had was, in that sense, what you want to communicate. Yes, at this point of time, we have seen a higher negative mix effect than we have seen in other quarters because, one, home care is growing. The others have mixed reasons, not grown as well this quarter. Second is the specific factor of the pack mix, which is quite unique to this quarter, so we expect some of this to normalize as we go forward.
But these are the reasons why what is otherwise, I think, a good volume growth is currently getting diluted by a negative mix bigger than we have seen in the recent quarters. And that's really what's going on. And this is just shift setup. I think we need to explain. But medium to long term, we think premiumizing is really where the market is growing. And we are therefore making all attempts to drive our mix higher. And even in this quarter, our contribution of 120 index and above segment is 100 basis points more than last year's same period. And the premium ends of the market are growing faster than the mass and popular, although the band is narrowed. So the general secular tenor premiumization is still inherently true for the country because that's what you would expect for country to slow PCC.
We just have to stay patient and do the right thing because that is the real deal, is to actually have a portfolio that's future-fit. And every quarter the things get better will be to our favor if we are competitive in the near term and future-fit in the long term.
Thank you, Rohit. That's comprehensive. Quickly on the two questions here, clarifications. On the Stratos formulation, could you just help us understand, let's say, what part of your or what proportion of your portfolio, except Dove and Pears, which I presume can't be part of Stratos given the unique formulation it has got? And what part of India you've already rolled it up?
Yeah. So Manoj and Stratos, exactly as I called out, that's more relevant for Lifebuoy and Lux.
And as we've called in the past as well, we rolled out Stratos formulation across both the brands, Lifebuoy and Lux, and across many PME geographies. Now, overall rollout always depends upon the innovation pipeline as well as to what mix have we running in different parts of the country. But let me say that large part of the country across PME clusters, across both the brands, we have moved to Stratos formulation. There are some pockets of brand geography combination because of the innovation footprint. We will make the move in the next couple of quarters. But a good part of the country today has already experienced Stratos formulation across both the brands. Understood.
Thank you, Ritesh.
I do recall the commentary in the July, it's exactly six months back about, let's say, thousands of tests you have done, etc., but I was only trying to understand and gain confidence for the fact that the product has actually gone into different parts of India, different maybe seasons, etc. And can we conclude that maybe let's say with 80% confidence that, let's say, the risk associated with the formulation change is very low today?
Yeah. So the answer is yes. And I would not say 80. Manoj, I'll say 100. We are very confident that Stratos formulation is the right thing to do. And now, having been in the market for the last six to nine months' time across multiple PME clusters and across both the brands, we only feel more confident with the feedback that we've got that this is the right thing to do.
The point that Rohit mentioned earlier and also what we spoke as part of prepared remark, what we're now doing with Lifebuoy would not have been possible if at all we had not made the first move with the product formulation change in the first place. So we believe it's the right thing to do in terms of unlocking space in the overall formulation to do more innovation and then add more elements to the product portfolio in terms of overall product quality for us to do the right thing. So yes, we feel very confident.
Thank you. And lastly, honestly, in my mind, actually, the elephant in the room is actually Horlicks. I understand that the macros are not necessarily favorable for growth and that too for something which is, let's say, fairly discretionary within Staples. So I get that aspect.
But only one thought question, which in my mind is, let's say, what you are thinking about Horlicks medium term, let's say, the actions which you could do. For example, let's say, conceptually, in my understanding, I understand price elasticity matters, but I thought this is a category in which, let's say, the consumer, so okay, let's put it this way. So let's say adult consumption, there is a kids' consumption, right? Now, I thought the kids' consumption part of it is fairly inelastic because it's sort of a product which, let's say, the mother would save elsewhere to buy. And we have seen a lot of pricing action. So the only question is, do you really think that there is any, I know that there's a premiumization aspect you're doing, but I'm talking about the Horlicks code. What are the interventions, let's say?
You will not tell the details, but do you think that there are material changes you need to do to drive growth on your own? Thank you.
Yeah. So we have, as you know, we've said before, because this brand has seen a lot of focus from all of us. This category, we have seen its market share growing, including as of date. We have seen its penetration growing. In fact, amongst our UBS or Unmissable Brand Superiority scores, it's amongst these two brands, Horlicks and Boost, amongst the best. These are iconic brands in South and East. And we have also seen the brand scores getting stronger. One place which has been a challenge is consumption, which has dragged it down with, of course, some inflation coming in in the recent past.
At this point, what we're trying to now do is to improve the price pack architecture to incentivize large pack users because by driving more large packs, we know that those households use more of the category compared to the ones that use small packs. So we are trying to incentivize consumers to buy more large packs. We're also working on how can we make the product and the core even more stickier by improving its taste. And we are looking at various routes to make the core stronger in the core product because I think that's everything else is basically green. So that's the job we're doing at this point. And once we have something proven ready, we'll share that with you. So we're on it to make sure that we address every possible potential opportunity we can get to drive more consumption, including, of course, white spaces.
But I guess the main thing is basically to get the core to basically grow in volumes. And there is, unfortunately, the compression that's coming on account of urban discretionary dampener, which does impact our categories in HFD way more than it does, say, other categories. Thank you.
Thank you, Rohit. Thank you, Ritesh. Appreciate it.
Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Arnab Mitra from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity. Actually, my first question was again on the outlook. So there has definitely been a change in what you saw as the outlook three months back versus now, which was stable consumption to moderating consumption. I think you partly answered it in the previous question, but is this change because you saw worsening of trends towards the second half of December quarter, including the small pack downtrading that you mentioned?
And if that is the case, could it get worse before it improves at a market level? Or do we take out a message that the worst is behind and things should improve from here given the cyclical factors?
Yeah. So no, no, important question. We should spend some time on it. So we had spoken the previous quarter that the demand trends are stable. When we saw muted, we had a comment in the last quarter that we'd expect demand trends to be stable, which means it'll be at a similar level as we saw in the previous quarter. And now, having experienced one more quarter, we see basically of the similar view that the moderation that we have seen will be there in near term to continue.
As we unpack similar trends, Arnab, as we saw in the previous quarter as well, that overall growth in urban has been moderating, and the rural recovery, which has been gradual, it has been recovering gradually. Now, we know that with a good kharif crop, a lot of balance sheets have got repaired in households and a good amount of improvement in reservoir levels, which has led to a better sowing, which we've seen for Rabi. Hence, we do hope and expect as in India, we'll end up seeing better Rabi outcome. That should be a good amount of news for rural consumption going forward as the crop gets harvested. We know that the pace of recovery, typically three macro factors will end up determining: be it employment, be it real wage growth, or for that matter, food inflation. We're watching these three macro factors.
But where these factors are today, we believe that the moderate overall subdued atmosphere for growth for FMCG industry will continue in near term. Now, rural Rabi, in my mind, is one green shoot which hopefully we'll end up seeing in the quarter. Small pack, I just want to also respond back to even some time back, same question had come. We believe this is transitory in nature. If I look at even last five years, COVID, post-COVID, when I look at the peak of inflation in 2022, we have seen this behavior where impacted disposable income of household, typically these two titrating volumes of purchase they end up doing. And we suddenly then start seeing the behavior coming in in terms of consumers, which is what we saw. We did not see that behavior till the previous quarter.
That was a new behavior that we saw in current quarter, December quarter. And when this behavior comes, it does remain for a couple of quarters. So we do believe that this will be there for a quarter or two more. But it is transitory in nature. I don't think so this is a long-term conversation, and it should go away in a quarter or so. And hence, on that element of market growth, we are hopeful. Now, pricing over in the market still is benign. There is inflation in skin cleansing. There is inflation in tea. But both these commodities at the end of December quarter and in January have come off. So tea, for example, came 7% off compared to what we saw in September quarter.
In fact, palm oil, crude palm oil, it went up to INR 1,150-INR 1,200, and then it's come down to more like INR 1,000 as we speak in early part of January. So we do believe that overall commodity inflation for FMCG, it will support. It will support the recovery of consumption overall. So hence, we are hopeful that we should see better times. But the pace of recovery will get determined. This is what happens with employment, real wage growth, and food inflation.
Yeah. Thanks, Ritesh. That's very helpful. My last question is actually on Minimalist. So it seems a very attractive space to be in, an attractive brand that they have built. The concern is that sometimes when these very fast-growing small companies are acquired by really large companies like HUL, it could lead to a little bit of loss of direction. The founder would probably leave after some time.
There are more systems and processes to follow. Decision-making can slow down. How do you guard against all of this, especially because this is a very dynamic, fast-growing business? And how do you think of the integration between HUL and Minimalist in this context?
Yeah. So what we have done, Arnab, you're absolutely right. Integration and operational model framework, extremely critical to get it right as part of any acquisition and equally applicable in case of Minimalist as well. We have put a lot of thinking behind it. And we've had a good amount of conversation with the founders. And we have a very clear playbook how we're going to operate the business. But we don't want to lose agility of the business. We don't want to lose speed of the business.
But equally, we want to bring all leverage of scale, of technology to the business so that we get the best of both worlds, which is why Team Minimalist and Team Hindustan Unilever will come together to ensure that we do best what is required for the brand: synergies of offline distribution, synergies of international expansion, synergies of supply chain, cost, procurement, capacity. All that, once we add with a very tightly written integration and operating model framework, this should be a success going forward. So we are very confident that we have put a lot of thinking behind this element as well, apart from all commercial elements of the deal as part of the conversation. So we believe that we have a right model to go forward.
But also, yeah, go ahead.
When I look at what we have done, Arnab, in Indulekha, this was the sixth, seventh time since we acquired. We had exactly done in the same space there as well. Oziva, which we have experienced now for the last two years, the business is more than two, two and a half times since we acquired the business. And we have exactly the same operating framework. So now we have experience of two such brands which have brought high-growth businesses operating in a fabulous agile manner. We acquired them. We have integrated them beautifully in the business. And we have kept the mojo of these brands within the organization in terms of growth and pace. So we feel confident that now it's the third time we end up doing the same thing. And we feel very confident about it.
So what I was saying was that we want to preserve the magic, the logic, the fundamentally robust business the two great founders have built. They're very inspiring founders. They've personally curated, crafted the brand. It's very sharp. They have consumer connect. They have agility. They have their own R&D, their own factory, etc. So we want to preserve that magic. At the same time, as Ritesh was saying, we want to leverage the reason why this, their membership of the family makes sense, like access to offline or international, our leverage of our costs, supply chain, and so on and so forth. There's a lot of opportunity to do that. But in the next further at least two years, we want them to operate like a speedboat. We will offer them whatever they need to become more successful.
Of course, basics like safety, health, and make sure that everything else is absolutely first standard will be another advantage they will get. But the idea is for them to fly with us offering them the enabling ecosystem and also to learn from them at the same time as giving to them. So we feel very excited. We'll be very, very mindful and intentional about building this kind of a model because we've learned with Oziva as well that has operated sort of like a speedboat outside the mother system that has kind of just done well. It's pivoted fast. It's leveraged us wherever they needed us. It's been lightly managed. There are HUL people there, but they operate in the startup as if they were founders there too. So we've learned from that. And this is going to be the way we will build these speedboats.
And eventually, when they get to a scale of place where we can think of next phase of integration, we will. But we'll be very, very mindful of this area.
Thanks so much. All the best for the year ahead.
Thank you. Thanks, sir.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Vivek M from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good evening. Two questions, Mike. Hi. My first question is the same on the demand trend. So we met in November, I think end of November. And you have had, let's say, a particular thought process on what you were seeing on the ground. And it looks like that December has moderated.
So what Arnab asked, I have the same question that I understand this is transitory, but do you think that it can get worse as we go forward before it starts to stabilize and then get better? Is there that risk as we head into, let's say, March and June quarter?
No. So Vivek, as we have seen multiple parameters, of course, all of us read all economic parameters. But more importantly, as we see consumption trend up and close across the length and breadth of the country, across channel, we don't believe there's a, let me say, there's a material issue which is brewing up. And hence, yes, there is a moderation in urban demand. There is a gradual recovery of rural. That trend is playing out as we have spoken consistently for the last couple of quarters. Small pack size we mentioned is more transitory in nature.
We've seen that happening. It self-corrects itself with things improving, but overall, I don't believe that we will have, let me say, more stress coming in in terms of consumption trends go forward from here onwards as a lot of, let me say, resources deployed to drive employment in the country, to improve food inflation levels that you see in the amount of work which is happening. I already see, I'm saying, the latest data which comes out in terms of crop, and we're hoping the outcome which comes out at the end of this season of vegetables will further support the food inflation in terms of managing it at a lower level compared to where it is, so when I look at all the signs plus repaid balance sheets, close Kharif, and good sowing for Rabi, so hence a better outcome when the crop is harvested.
So things should look better from here. It's just that in near term where we are in short term, we believe that the current trends is what we believe subdued will continue. But I don't think so this will last for many quarters. And hopefully, we also start seeing them building on from where we are at this point in time. Commodities overall for FMCG are also behaving. They are benign at an aggregate level. Yes, there is some inflation somewhere, some deflation somewhere. Sequentially, the peak of increase is also coming off. So we believe that even commodity atmosphere within FMCG should also support the recovery of consumption growth going forward.
Yeah. I just wanted to complement Ritesh's response from a lens of what does HUL do, right? And I think we cannot forecast the future with high level of accuracy.
But what we can forecast is what we should be doing. So what we are doing is we are, first of all, focused on excellence in our execution and a volume-led competitive outcome. That is the winning metric for all our teams. We are growing in every segment, every geography, every channel. And if you're not, then we address those, every brand, and we fix them, and we move on. So our overall rubric is, are we growing competitively? Largely volume-led. And we are. And our volumes are indeed well ahead of the market. Of course, they're diluted by a deeper negative mix to score. Number two, we want to go where the growth is because there is growth in the market, e.g., e-commerce, e.g., parts of rural, e.g., small packs, e.g., some categories like essentials like home care, haircare.
So we are going to basically go where the growth is and pivot our investments there. And number three, we have to be future-fit. So we have to build a portfolio that in good times is going to be in the right places. So Minimalist is an example of plugging a gap, benefit-price channel gap that gives us then the portfolio we can fully play with. And as tailwinds come back, and they will because that is the nature of the game and our PCs are so low they have to, that we will be better positioned, a stronger company at that point of time. And it could be a quarter or two. It could be three. We can't say for sure. But we are not working on a hypothesis that this is going to be forever. We think this is going to get better. We can't say specifically when.
Sure. Sure. Absolutely understand that. And yeah, the trends are quite difficult to predict. Rohit and Ritesh, in the context of what you have said and let's say 30th November or somewhere there versus now, do you think there is also a risk to this negative mix what we have seen? So what you mentioned in this quarter, premiumization continues. But do you think that temporarily that because rural picks up, urban moderates, and on top of that, there is a small pack phenomena also? Because we haven't seen really, let's say, negative mix in your business for a long time. But do you think momentarily that is something that is also possible?
Yeah. So let me just comprehensively talk about mix within Hindustan Unilever now. And so as we spoke earlier, that overall home care growth ahead of the rest of the business, number one.
Number two, small pack growth, which is something that is a trend breaker in the quarter, negated by the uplift which we typically get because of premium growing ahead of the rest of the business. On a net basis, the mix has been negative for the quarter. If I look at mix going forward, I do believe, and we do believe at this point in time that the impact of small pack negative mix should self-correct in a quarter or so, number one. Number two, our own drive to make portfolio more premium, that should continue building further mix possibility within our own performance going forward. Look at Beauty and Wellbeing. So Beauty and Wellbeing for the first half of this financial year grew in mid-single digit. Current quarter, it grew at 1%, impacted by delayed winter.
If I take winter out, even in this quarter, Beauty and Wellbeing grew at mid-single digit. So there are also those factors which are more here and now for this quarter. Going forward, they will not be present on themselves. So we do believe that our overall trend of premium growing ahead of the rest of the business and our own play of driving more premium going forward, that should help us to keep building mix. So hence, I would say this is more of a conversation which has got accentuated given the development of small pack in the current quarter. But we don't see concern going forward in terms of mix improvement.
Got it. And last, a small question on Minimalist.
Whatever purchase consideration that you have paid or beyond that also, when you have bought it, I'm guessing that there will be not just the brand that you are getting. The idea would also be your existing portfolio you learn from Minimalist, let's say, promoters, founders, management, etc. So in your purchase consideration, is there part of that consideration paid for the learning that you will have for your own beauty business also?
No. So when we acquired this business, I quoted number that on secondary buyout, let's say, done for INR 2,955 crores at 5.96 multiple. And this price, this is to acquire the brand. As of now, we acquired 90.5% of that enterprise value. And we will acquire the balance 9.5% in two years' time.
And we do believe that once we have acquired this business, of course, this is all subject to getting closing done over next one quarter with all the conditions. And once everything is done, what we want to do, Vivek, is to get synergies together about the businesses. And we have a lot to offer, as I articulated earlier. Rohit also summarized them. So the way we see going forward, we will end up bringing synergies from both sides to the table to make the brand bigger, to make the business model more stronger and more profitable compared to where it is, and keep the pace of growth which the business has had. So that's what we want to do going forward. But the acquisition price that we paid is for acquiring the brand and the business.
No, sorry. That's what I understand, Ritesh.
But I'm saying on the strength of, let's say, Minimalist brand, do you think your base portfolio also benefits quite a bit when you discuss with QC, when you discuss with e-commerce platforms?
Yeah. No, that is absolutely right. Although we've not monetized that in our business case. But it is absolutely our intention through osmosis of learning how they're built. And we do have Love Beauty and Planet, Simple, Novology. These are almost digital-first brands as well. And Oziva. So there's definitely going to be cross-learning and synergy. But it's not something that we have currently captured as a value. But there's definitely the value that we're looking to get from this relationship.
Super. Thank you and wishing you all the best.
Thanks.
Thanks, Vivek.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Percy Panthaki from IIFL Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi.
Just wanted to understand, apart from the winter care portfolio impact, is there any other sort of little bit of slowdown that you have seen in BPC? A few quarters ago, you had said that the premium part, which is approximately 2,000 crores, that is growing at 20%. So is that 20% growth rate maintained? And secondly, the slowdown that we saw in the mass skincare over the last two quarters or so, has that remained at that same level or has it accelerated? So that's my first question.
So yes, the 2,000-odd crores portfolio that we have, Percy, and the six big bets we've spoken about, the growth trajectory of that portion of the business continues to remain strong.
Even this quarter, we have grown in good double digits, that portfolio of 2,000 crores, both in organized trade and, of course, pretty good amount of growth in e-commerce as well. On mass and cleansing, let me hand over to Rohit.
On mass and skincare? Mass and skincare, that is an area we do feel while there's an improvement sequentially, there's work to be done. If you really ask me, that's the sort of primary area in skincare that we need to address. We have started doing that, as you mentioned, in our capital markets today. So Glow & Lovely is a very big brand. As you know, it's got the highest unmissable brand security score we have. It's got a 60%-70% rural penetration. Over the last few years, it's seen under rural stress, a category dropout leading to loss of penetration.
In urban areas, consumers have also evolved. Temperatures are high, so considering all of this, we are already in the middle of revamp brand. We have, at the very top end, already started entering serum, sunscreen, and face cleansing, but they are the smaller part of the total game plan. We have just recently launched, actually, Glass Bright, which addresses the urban consumer's need for light sensorials. And it's a premium proposition. It's got good technology. It's a very premium formulation and product with a carton pack, etc., but at a very affordable price, so Glow & Lovely Urban will therefore have pretty much a contemporary brand for brightening available at a very good access price, and in rural, which is, of course, the large part of the Glow & Lovely business, we are in the middle of revamping and relaunching the core.
And that will be in the market in the next few weeks. And you will see that that is a reset of the product, the pack. It's a complete re-expression of the brand Glow & Lovely, still built on the essence of transformation of how your confidence and your presence. And that will be something in this space of beauty from within and brightening from within. And we'll just have to wait for a little bit to watch that in the market. But that's coming soon as well. So we are putting a whole lot of effort behind Glow & Lovely because it's so central to our core business. And that's been an area of decline and concern over the last few years and quarters.
And plus that is addressed, I think. The rest of the business has, as Ritesh mentioned, non-Haircare group as well, mid-single digits, the Skin double digits. And if winter had come on time, we would have also seen. So I think generally that's the main focus for us to address.
Got it. Got it. My second question is on the macro. So rural is doing decently well. Urban is under pressure. What would require in the macro to change for the growth at an industry level to improve?
I think while we can, I mean, as you can speak to macroeconomic interventions and we have a competent institutional, the government is addressing all of this as are so many other people.
So I think I don't want to comment very broadly towards what macroeconomically.
No, not what the government should do, but what are the macro indicators that you think need to improve? Is it food inflation, which is the main problem, or is it real wage growth? What exactly is the problem? One or two macro indicators which, if they improve, you think your growth can improve.
All of the above, the three things that we believe, as we do all the specialists we speak to, is, of course, the real wage growth, food inflation, and employment levels. And if those three improve and consumer confidence, then we would see the urban consumption also click up. I think the stress started coming in more from food inflation.
If you just correlate, I'm not giving you causality, then as food inflation comes down because winter's been good for crops, it's already coming down, and then I guess it'll start impacting the urban markets positively, but like I said, I am always, as a person, not very, I don't like giving macroeconomic views because it's not my area of competence. What I can speak to is what we are doing, which is even in this market circumstances, we are looking to go where the growth is, invest in growing our market share, largely led by volume, which is more users, and ensure that we don't take our eyes off the longer term and keep doing the right things, so that's the mantra that I will keep coming back to because that's the only three things that we as a company can control.
Got it. One quick question in the end.
I recently noticed in a shop in Bombay that for Lux, the old and the new formulation are both available in the same shop. And this is after six to eight months of launch. So what is the logic behind this kind of a strategy of sort of having both of the things, both of the formulations available at the same shop? I'm sure it's been long enough for the pipeline to dry up by now.
So I can't speak to the—I mean, I'm sure you would have seen what you would have seen in that one particular store. But generally speaking, there is an overlap because we don't totally dry the pipelines for this category. And we've done these transitions over many years, I mean, many times. And Lux is growing market share with the new formulation, the new pack, the new advertising. Lux Sandal is in the market.
So at this point, and the brand's becoming a master brand. So all the signals and outcomes on Lux brand are strong. So on the aggregate, based on all data points beyond just that one outlet, things are looking good. And we want to make Lux even stronger.
So have you stopped producing the old formulation completely now?
Yeah. Yes, of course.
Yeah. We have.
Yeah. Got it. Okay. That's all from me. Thank you very much.
There's no end. There was no cut. Zero date. It's not introduced. Thanks, Percy.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Latika Chopra from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Hi, team. I have a question. The first one was just trying to get flavor from—
Sorry to interrupt, Latika, but you are not clear.
Yeah. Is it better now?
Slightly better. Please go ahead.
Okay.
My first question was if you could provide some flavor on the growth for modern trade channels during the quarter. Did it have any bearing on offtake of larger packs versus smaller packs? And the second question was on oral care, if you could give us some flavor on this mid-single-digit growth, was it pricing-led or it was a balance of volume and price-led? Thank you.
Yeah. Interesting. Yeah. So overall organized trade, if I just bucket it, and that's how we typically want to speak. Overall organized trade, if I look at modern trade e-commerce put together, we have grown in double-digit. Overall, if I look at the segment and growth, like everything else put together, even that has slowed down compared to the previous quarter. So we have grown in double-digit.
We know that, Latika, whenever we grow in a channel double-digit, especially modern trade, e-commerce as organized trade, there's always a growth of the geography. But equally important is a channel shift where consumers would have moved from other channels into buying into modern trade and e-commerce. But the secular trend of, let me say, consumption getting further built into organized trade, that has continued. And in terms of small pack, large pack, overall, the portfolio that we sell in organized trade is typically more premium compared to general trade. So the conversation on large pack, small pack is more accentuated, I would say, in general trade, both rural and urban as compared to organized trade. Understood.
And any other oral care underlying volume for regular? Oral care.
Oral care, oral care grew mid-single digit, driven by pricing and driven by Close Up, which is the master brand that we have, which has been doing pretty good business for us.
All right. Thank you so much for the clarification.
Thank you.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Sheela Rathi from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thanks for taking my question. My first question was with respect to the beauty and well-being margins. For the last few quarters, we have been seeing a decelerating trend. So just wanted to understand, and I understand that we are making investments here, but just wanted to understand where these margins should stabilize.
Yeah. So I think you self-answered the question and very clear that a beauty margin enjoys a healthy margin compared to the total aggregate in the BPC and the overall.
This is an area we have called out consistently that we will invest, and we are investing in more innovations, more investments, more capabilities. We know that as we end up growing the business ahead of the average of HUL, the mixed benefit will come, and hence it will self-pay in terms of P&L ROI. So we are okay for the margins to drop so far as the growth is above average growth of HUL. The phase that we are in now, we are doing the job of building portfolio and building the number one beauty portfolio in the country today. The point I was mentioning earlier that 900 basis points is the portfolio shift that we want to do in a few years' time towards premium. That's the job we are at. You will see more innovation intensity.
You will see more launches as you already have seen this quarter and also going forward in March quarter as well. It's a busy quarter for us in beauty and well-being. So we do believe that we will take some amount of margin basically decline in beauty and well-being compared to the healthy levels of around 30% that we have today, but it will more than pay back in terms of its economical value within the P&L if the growth keeps happening above average growth of HUL. Understood.
My second question was on Minimalist. I think it's a very interesting acquisition, and it ticks the boxes on a lot of things. It's a sizable business, online business, even profitable business. My question here is, at the CMD, we had called out that we'll be making disproportionate investments in the beauty and well-being category.
Is this going to be a continuous thing that we will look for more synergistic investments going ahead, or we'll wait for some more time for this particular business scales up and then we look for more opportunity?
Yeah. See, there are four different routes that you want to take to build portfolio in B&W. Number one, we want to take our current large brands and expand them into more demand spaces. Exactly what we have done with Pond's and Lakmé and took them to serums, took them to face cleansing, took them to sun care. As appropriate, we've expanded them into more demand spaces, the six big bets within B&W, as we call them. Second route for us is to bring brands within the stable of Unilever into India as relevant. Simple, Love Beauty and Planet are classic examples where we got global brands into India.
So that's the second way in which we are building portfolio within B&W. Third is launching our own brand, leveraging technology that we have globally as Unilever and bring new products in the marketplace to address demand space gaps that we have. So the derma gap that we had is where we launched Novology as an intervention. So that's the third route for us to make portfolio shift. And the fourth route, which we had called out, we will do bolt-on acquisitions as we get the right target. And Minimalist is a classic example. At this point in time, it was Oziva some time back. It was Indulekha some time back. So as and when we come across a business which we believe is a fabulous fit and we can add value and we can create more synergies, we will go ahead with it.
We are very selective about it, and hence the pace at which we'll end up doing it is not concentrated on one area within the four steps of, let me say, inaugurating. We want to do all the four areas to build our portfolio.
Understood. Very clear. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, I will now hand the conference over to Ms. Shilpa Kedia to take up questions from the web. Over to you, ma'am.
Thank you, Dhawan. We do not have any new questions on the web. With that, we now come to the end of the Q&A session. Before we end, let me remind you that the playback of this event will be available on the investor website in a short while. Thank you, everyone, for your participation and have a great day.
Thank you, everyone.
Thank you. See you soon.
Thank you.
On behalf of Hindustan Unilever Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you all for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.
Thank you.