Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the Q2 and H1 FY 2027 earnings conference call hosted by Piramal Finance Limited. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during this conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touchtone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. The result materials are available on the exchange and the company's website, and you may refer to them during the discussion. Please note that today's discussion may include certain forward-looking statements which must be viewed in conjunction with the company's risk and uncertainties that the company faces. These statements are based on the management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes.
On the call today, we have with us Mr. Anand Piramal, Chairman; Mr. Jairam Sridharan, MD and CEO; Mr. Rupen Jhaveri, Group President; Mr. Yesh Nadkarni, CEO, Wholesale Lending; Mr. Vikash Singhla, CFO; and Mr. Ravi Singh, Head, IR and Strategy. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Anand Piramal for his comments. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today on this call to discuss Q2 FY 2027 results of Piramal Finance. I hope you and your families are enjoying the ongoing festival season, and I wish you all happiness and prosperity. An important announcement before we get into Q2 results discussion. I am delighted to welcome Mr. Dinesh Kumar Khara, who joins today as an independent director for a five-year term. Mr. Khara has been one of the most respected CEOs in the financial services sector. During his tenure, the market cap of SBI moved from $20 billion to $90 billion at a CAGR of 47%. During his career, particularly as chairman of SBI, he strengthened one of India's most important financial institutions and expanded access to formal banking and credit for millions of Indians.
His experience, judgment, and deep understanding of financial services will be invaluable, and we look forward to his counsel and guidance. With that, let me now begin with a few observations on the macroeconomic environment and take you through our performance during the quarter. India's financial sector has remained resilient amid geopolitical upheavals. NBFC Gross NPAs have declined significantly over the last few years alongside robust credit growth, particularly among upper tier institutions. This resilience reflects the strength of the broader Indian economy. International institutions like IMF have revised India's GDP growth projections for FY 2027 and FY 2028 upwards, supported by robust consumption, capital expenditure, and stable forex reserves. However, rising global inflation will exert pressure on India's cost of capital. H2 FY 2027 is likely to see a broad-based increase in borrowing costs in line with the RBI's shift from a neutral stance to calibrated tightening.
Nevertheless, we do not expect any notable slowdown in borrowing activity, with liquidity conditions remaining adequate. Emerging global risks warrant close monitoring, particularly rising U.S. and Japanese sovereign bond yields and the prospect of crude oil prices remaining high for longer, which could amplify inflationary pressures and tighten global financial conditions. Moving on to our company's Q2 performance.
Our growth AUM now stands at 98.5% of total AUM. In Q2, growth AUM increased by a healthy 30% year-on-year. Total AUM grew by 24% year-on-year to INR 113,112 crore. Q2 FY 2027 ROAUM of growth business was at 2% annualized, 34 basis points higher than 1.7% ROAUM in Q2 FY 2026. In Q2 FY 2027, our PAT was up 67% year-on-year to INR 545 crore, with underlying growth business PBT of INR 538 crore. Thus, our H1 FY 2027 PAT is also up 67% year-on-year and crossed the INR 1,000 crore mark.
Asset quality was stable and healthy across both our retail and wholesale businesses, and we share more details later on this call. In Q2, we completed a total equity fund raise of INR 3,850 crore, including a QIP of INR 2,100 crore and preferential allotment of warrants of INR 1,750 crore to the promoter group. This was our first fundraise as Piramal Finance, and we are encouraged to see the response to QIP in terms of demand from investors, and an eventual participation of several marquee domestic and international investors. In September, we completed five years since the merger of DHFL in September 2021. In every possible way, this merger has proven to be a transformational one for the company. It provides us a platform on which we could steadily build up further.
The acquired product suite of mortgages and real estate lending has expanded to more than 10 key product categories, diversified across secured and unsecured retail and mid-market corporate lending. In five years post the merger, our branch network and employee base has further grown by 3x, while AUM have grown 5x in five years, from INR 23,000 crore to INR 1.1 lakh crore for the growth business, making us one of the fastest growing retail finance stories in the country. While a large part of what we recorded on day one of the merged balance sheet has naturally run down, imprint of this, arguably, is the most consequential effect mergers of India is visible across our businesses' balance sheet and P&L. In these years, we made gains of more than INR 3,000 crore from DHFL's stress book.
The large pool of long-term, low-cost fixed rate borrowing rolled over from erstwhile DHFL continues to support our liabilities base. There is a tax shield of INR 16,000 crore of assessed carry forward losses, mostly arising from DHFL, still available to us. As the youngest NBFC among India's upper layer NBFCs, we are privileged to be serving over 6.5 million customers across semi-urban India, combining physical distribution with technology and AI in our processes. With a AA+ rating and demonstrated retail-led diversified business model at scale, we are confident in our ability to deliver steady and healthy earnings growth. With that, I will hand over to Jairam to share more details on the results.
Thank you, Anand. Good afternoon, everyone. I will begin by providing some details on our performance for this quarter, our progress against strategic priorities, and some special topical matters for this quarter. Let's start with growth on slide number four. At the start of the year, we had guided for a 25% AUM growth in FY 2027. Over the medium term as well, we expect our AUM to double every three years, implying an AUM of INR 1.5 lakh crore by FY 2028. Against these aspirations, in Q2 FY 2027, our AUM was up 24% year-on-year to INR 113,112 crore. Growth AUM was up 30% year-on-year, while the legacy book came down by 69% year-on-year.
With our growth AUM at 98.5% of the total AUM now and scaling up at 30%+ year-on-year for the past several quarters, we remain on track for our FY 2027 and FY 2028 AUM growth expectations. Our retail AUM growth remains strong. The strong pickup seen in Q1 in disbursement growth continued to get even stronger in Q2. Disbursements were up 34% year-on-year in the second quarter. Retail AUM grew by 30% year-on-year to INR 97,462 crore. Our mortgage business, comprising housing loans and Loan Against Property, grew by 27% year-on-year to INR 64,650 crore. Mortgages account for 57% of the company's AUM. If you look at slide 25, which has product level details, you will note that there are substantially higher growth rates that are visible for mass affluent housing loans and larger ticket LAP plus business within our HL and LAP books.
With our rating upgrade, our ability to serve these segments is significantly higher. With risk performance under control, AUM growth in our four unsecured product categories, Personal Loans, Unsecured Business Loans, Digital Loans, and Rural Micro Loans, all gained momentum. These AUM were up 46% year-on-year to INR 23,764 crore and now form 21% of the company's AUM. If you look at slide 31, you will see that our customer franchise grew by 26% year-on-year to 6.5 million. With the uptick in unsecured disbursements, both our overall customer franchise and our cross-sell franchise growth have been improving. Our sourcing from cross-sell in unsecured disbursements was at 30%, which we expect to keep improving over the coming years. Our cross-sell portfolio, of course, comes with significantly lower OpEx and credit risk. In the second quarter, we did not add any full-service urban branch.
We did, instead, expand our network for gold loans and rural loans. The gold loans network expanded to 100 branches from 67 in the previous quarter, and we aim to have 200 gold loan branches by the end of March 2027. On the rural side, we expanded from 178 branches last quarter to 203 branches by the end of this quarter. The company's total branch network now stands at 838. Wholesale AUM was up 24% year-on-year in the second quarter to INR 13,978 crore. The mix between real estate and mid-market lending stands at 68/32. Moving on from growth towards profitability. I'd like to start from slide number five. Return on AUM for our growth business increased to 2% per annum in the second quarter versus 1.7% in Q2 FY 2026. Leverage, i.e., AUM to equity, was at 3.6x in the second quarter compared to 3.7x in the first quarter.
In the second quarter, of course, we completed a capital raise that Anand mentioned. We had structured the raise in a manner so as not to take a very large hit on leverage in that quarter. With continued AUM growth, leverage should continue to progress towards our goal of 4.5 x- 5x in the medium term. Let's go now into some of the components of our return on AUM, starting with margins. The company's net income margin was flat quarter-on-quarter at 6.5%, which you can see on slide 15. This is very close to the level for our overall growth book net interest margin at 6.8%. Of course, it will get closer still as the legacy book goes off our portfolio. Cost of borrowing. Of course, a lot of attention has been placed, justifiably, on the liability side of NBFC books.
I would like to draw your attention to slides 16, 17, and 18 for a discussion on our cost of borrowing. Our incremental cost of borrowing at Piramal Finance continues to decline steadily. Following our domestic rating upgrades to AA+ between January and March 2026, cost of incremental long-term borrowing has declined from 9.36% in H1 FY 2026 to 8.67% in H2 and further to 8.46% in H1 FY 2027. We have roughly INR 37,500 crore of long-term borrowings, which are due for maturity in the next 18 months. If you look at slide 17, the bottom left chart shows that our current incremental cost of borrowing is meaningfully lower than the carrying cost of these borrowings that are going to mature and retire over the next 18 months. This continues to provide us a strong tailwind on the cost of borrowing side.
Our market-linked borrowings are less than a third of our total borrowings. We also have variable rate liabilities, which are slightly lower than our total variable rate assets, as you can see in the top right chart of slide number 16. This again positions us well in a rising rate environment. Despite the way market rates have moved in recent months and the RBI's recent and likely upcoming repo hikes, we believe that our overall cost of business at Piramal Finance on a stock basis will continue to be at similar or lower levels over the next 12 months. Cost of borrowing, I am sorry. Moving to retail income, slide 22. You will see the total retail income was 14.6% of loans versus 14.7% in the first quarter. The small delta is largely driven by the higher number of days in the second quarter versus the first quarter.
Other income was stable QOQ. If you recall, in Q1, we had made and disclosed a considered strategic choice to perform fewer debt assignment transactions, resulting in a reduction in our income line and an increase in ongoing annuity. Moving on to insurance. Following the 23rd September consultation paper from IRDAI, we had disclosed on 24th September our initial assessment of how our insurance commission income is likely to be impacted. The company currently exclusively distributes life insurance products of Pramerica Life Insurance, where we have 50% stake as a promoter. If the consultation paper is implemented as it is with an effective date of 1st April 2027, we estimate a gross reduction in insurance commission, potentially having 18 to 24 basis points of impact on FY 2028 return on assets. However, that is at a gross level.
Any improvement in economics of Pramerica Life Insurance will flow back proportionately to Piramal Finance during consolidation. Thus, the company has a natural hedge and a clawback available in the way the company is structured. Apart from this, there are other levers that are available to the company as well. For instance, rationalization of sales incentives for selling of insurance and other forms of product clawbacks. We believe this can significantly cushion the impact on profitability on a net basis in FY 2028 and beyond. In the near term, the company remains confident of meeting all our earlier stated FY 2027 profit growth guidances of 50% profit growth year-on-year. OpEx. Retail OpEx to AUM declined by 5 basis points on a quarter-on-quarter basis to 3.48%. You will see this on slide 22. You will notice that we have now consistently reduced our OpEx to AUM for almost four years.
While we are now well in the target range of retail OpEx to AUM, the ratio continues to move downwards. The continued productivity gains for our employees and branches, we believe have the potential to take retail OpEx to AUM to further lower levels over FY 2027. The reduction in retail OpEx to AUM has driven growth business OpEx to AUM down 33 basis points year-on-year to 3.2%. At a company level, our cost to income was 52% in the second quarter, down from 61% in the second quarter last year and 65% in second quarter of FY 2025, as you will see on slide 52. Tech and AI have been key enablers of both our growth and our productivity enhancements. Slides 33 and 34 show some details of our enterprise AI strategy, which we have called Piramal.ai.
On slide 33, the dashboard that we regularly share shows progress of AI use cases across all aspects of our business, such as sales, underwriting, collections, audit and compliance, customer experience, and people management. Like every quarter, this quarter, we have put a spotlight on one area heavily impacted by AI, and this time on slide 34, we have covered customer experience, cx.ai. Most impactful use cases of AI in customer experience have been GenAI powered automation of routine service emails, allowing human agents to focus more on cross-sell to these customers, leading to a 5x increase in cross-sell productivity of human agents. This versus what it looked like before AI took over email response. Pia, our self-service AI assistant, interacts with customers across WhatsApp and Piramal's app, resulting in INR 6.3 lakh interactions in the second quarter for queries, payments, and new loan offers.
Pia also generated 20% of our total cross-sell leads during the quarter. Our conversational AI bot, Bots, resulted in INR 102 crore of PL cross-sell in the second quarter and INR 172 crore of end-to-end collections of overdue EMIs and fees in a human-free manner. You can see how cx.ai is boosting our productivity, digital engagement, and cross-sells. Moving to risk. Credit risk across the portfolio continued to see the strength that we witnessed in Q1. All risk metrics, both early and late, across both secured and unsecured, continued to look very strong. Our overall retail 90 + delinquency is at 0.7%, stable in a narrow range of 0.6%-0.8% over the last four years. Growth business credit cost was down by 10 basis points quarter-on-quarter to 1.5%. Unsecured in particular, shows risk at multi-year lows and delinquencies at one third of peak levels.
There are four additional dimensions which I would like to share specific risk insights on. First, in the IT sector. In the last quarter, I had mentioned emerging risk challenges in home loans for IT sector customers from South India. That situation persists. The good news, however, is that it has not spread to other adjacent segments. The second is on the monsoon impact. The weak monsoon does not seem to have had a negative impact on agri-income customers, at least so far. Bounce rate in this customer segment was the same as in the first quarter FY 2027 and 110 basis points lower than the second quarter FY 2026. Leverage at the customer level. Overall leverage levels continue to be low. We had indeed seen some increase in leverage in digital lending business in Q4 and Q1, but that has subsided back down in the second quarter.
As of this quarter, leverage of customers applying for loans from us is lower than it was two years ago in every single product category. The fourth dimension on which I want to add some risk insight is on gold loans. This is an important area of emerging risk in our mind, which is the rapidly increasing presence of gold loans on customer files. Two years ago, on our portfolio depending on product, 20%-25% of customers had an active gold loan outside. That number is now above 35% in all product categories. Secondly, in financial year 2026, across the industry, approximately INR 4.7 lakh crore of gold loan disbursements happened to customers in deep delinquency, i.e., more than 90 days past due. Today, presence of a gold loan on file is not yet an indicator of higher risk in the portfolio.
However, we believe that these data points that I just shared are worth noting and tracking. Lastly, along with growth and profitability, we have been equally focused on predictability and consistency. If you look at slide number six, our second quarter PAT of INR 545 crore has kept up the steady and predictable earnings trajectory of the last eight to 10 quarters. Our trailing 12-month EPS growth is currently running at 155% year-on-year. We disclosed long-term, four-year plus quarterly data across most key parameters, showing the discipline and rigor that go into delivering predictability and consistency. Our risk charts, for example, cover both vertical and horizontal risk across the portfolio and across individual products for four-plus years.
With the transformation journey of last five years since DHFL merger behind us, the recently concluded capital raise demonstrating the confidence of promoters and other investors, and the strong performance in the first two quarters of financial year 2027, we remain confident of meeting our near-term FY 2027 and medium-term guidance on growth, profitability, and stability of earnings and risk performance. With that, let me hand over the call to Yesh to discuss our wholesale business.
Thanks, Jairam. As at September 2026, the wholesale book stood at INR 13,978 crore, which was a growth of 24% year-on-year. Real estate to CMML mix stood at 68/32. Average ticket size of the book was INR 55 crore and average yield of the portfolio was 14.1%. During the second quarter, we disbursed INR 2,615 crore across 91 separate transactions, including 41 new transactions and 50 transactions which were sanctioned in the previous quarters but were partly disbursed during this quarter. Repayments continued to be elevated as we received INR 1,889 crore or about 72% of the disbursed amounts during the quarter. Due to high rate of prepayments to date, about 74% of our contractual repayments due in FY 2027 have already been paid by our borrowers to us as of today.
The strong prepayment trend continues as we have seen over the past few quarters as well and is proving to be a growth headwind for our wholesale business, but it also highlights robust portfolio performance. Separately, our legacy AUM decreased significantly by INR 780 crore or 32% quarter-on-quarter, leading to an AUM of INR 1,673 crore, which is now just 1.5% of our total AUM as Jairam alluded to earlier. With sharply falling share of legacy book, we expect to discontinue its separate disclosures after the December quarter. The chunky reduction in legacy book in Q2 was PBT neutral. We carry a spare provision of INR 459 crore on the legacy book. With this, I will hand over to Vikash to cover financials.
Thank you, Yesh. Moving to our financial performance. In Q2 FY 2027, we reported consolidated net profit of INR 545 crore as against INR 327 crore in Q2 FY 2026, which is up by 67% year-on-year. Pro forma PBT for growth business stood at INR 538 crore in Q2 FY 2027 versus INR 344 crore in Q2 FY 2026. The net interest margin for company level is at 6.5%, which is up 35 basis points year-on-year and flat quarter-on-quarter. Growth business NIM was 6.8% versus 6.9% in Q2 FY 2026 and 6.8% in Q1 FY 2027. The capital raise in Q2 had a positive impact of 5 basis points on our NIM. Our total income thus grew 33% year-on-year to INR 1,767 crore. Operating expense growth was contained at 13% year-on-year. Pre-provisioning operating profit thus grew by 64% year-on-year to INR 846 crore.
Growth business credit cost was 1.5% versus 1.6% in Q1 FY 2027. In Q2, along with the reduction in legacy book, we had profit and loss gain of INR 90 crore from recovery in legacy business. With this, company's overall credit cost was at 1.1% versus 1.8% in Q1 FY 2027. Our total GNPA and NNPA were at 2.4% and 1.7% respectively. Our net worth stands at INR 31,180 crore. Our capital adequacy is at 20.1% at the end of September 2026. In Q2, the QIP added almost 200 basis points to our capital adequacy. It also had a positive impact of 5 basis points on our ROAUM, and it led to reduction of just 0.1x in our Q2 end leverage. We are confident to stay comfortable on capital adequacy over next few years while funding our growth and expanding the leverage.
As discussed in previous quarter, there are opportunity of non-dilutive regulatory capital releasing our balance sheet, likely over the next 12 to 24 months. That, combined with our recent capital raise, implies enough runway for growth capital for some years. With these remarks, I would now like to open the floor for questions. Thank you.
Thank you very much. We will now begin with the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and then one on their touchtone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and then two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, please wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and one to ask a question. We have the first question from the line of Shreya Shivani from Nomura Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thank you for the [audio distortion] . I have two questions. First is on the cost of funds. Now that we are officially in the rate hike cycle, what is our view on what product segments will we be passing on the higher rates to our end customers? When will we do it? Will we wait for another MPC before we take that decision? Any color around that would be helpful. My second question is on the yield movement. There has been a significant sequential decline in the legacy book. However, the yields were sort of flattish between 1Q to 2Q. Is it fair to say that once it is completely out of the base, from 3Q onwards, it will start showing up in the yields? Any thought process around that? And sorry, one more question.
The third question is, while your asset quality trends, which is slide 23, is stable, but if you see the vintage risk, there is a slight pickup in probably the digital loans and the housing loans. I guess the housing loans probably is explained by the IT sector employees, if that is correct. Any other color around that would be useful. Thank you.
Perfect. Great questions. Thank you, Shreya. Question number one, cost of funds and passing it on to customers. See, unlike banks, NBFCs are on a PLR regime, so we will pass on rates when our PLRs increase, which will happen once our cost of borrowing falls. Essentially, we will wait for our cost of borrowing to fall, which will take a little bit of a lag. After that, there will be a little bit of a lag before we pass it on to our customers. In the last cycle, we saw the lagged impact on our cost of borrowing to be almost one year, and then about a three-month further lag for us to actually pass things on to our customers. 50% of our assets, roughly, are going to be of this variety, where we can pass on mostly our home loans and Loan Against Property customers.
I don't expect anything being passed on yet. We need to first see the impact on our cost of borrowing. If it starts increasing, then we will go ahead and increase rates. Otherwise, you shouldn't expect to see much action on that front. Your second question was on risk, right?
House.
NIM. Oh, NIM. Okay, yields. What happened to yields and why didn't yields go up if legacy book came down. To some extent, your hypothesis is correct, but also there is a simpler explanation, which is a simple technical explanation, which is that number of days in this quarter was higher by one day compared to the previous quarter. That takes away almost 11 basis points of yields if calculated for the retail business, and since mostly our book is retail, that shows as a compression in NIM. It's not real. Don't worry about it. It's just optical based on the number of days.
Oh, okay.
Your third question was on risk, and particularly you spoke about what is it?
Slide 24, vintage risk.
Vintage risk.
Oh, vintage risk. Vintage risk. See, the digital loans, there is nothing there, Shreya Shivani. The Q4 was low. Otherwise, actually, there is nothing much there. Risk is looking very good. By the way, in digital loans, 90%+ of our lending is on FLDG. So anyway, it is not credit risk on our book. Whatever increase happens here, unless we breach the 5%, it is basically on the partner's book, not on our book.
So I am not worried at all on the digital lending side. Your catch on housing loans is absolutely the right one. That is appropriate to look at. That is a real increase. That has actually happened there. There is one big case. There is a INR 4 crore case from Q2 of FY 2026, which turned out to be fraudulent, which is there in that number. So that number has ticked up because of that one case.
I expect that number to come back down in Q2 because we are seeing the Q2 numbers at the nine-month level. They are looking a lot better. I expect that that number will come back down. That one is a real uptick driven by one fraud case.
That is useful. Sir, on the commentary that you made on the gold loan, that the gold loan disbursements are towards customers in deep 90+, et cetera. Any thought process around your own strategy? How are you thinking about it, about your own team?
Depending on how you count, on a gross disbursement basis, anywhere from 15%-22%, 23% of gross disbursements in gold loans over the last year have happened to customers who are 90 days-plus past due on at least one of their live trades. It is a shockingly high number. That number for Piramal for October so far is less than 1%. We do not disburse gold loans to customers who are more than 90 days past due. We just do not do it, even though that is almost a fifth of the market today. Of course, we are a very small player in gold loans. We just started. This is not an area where we are going to compromise, so it is less than a percent of our disbursements.
Okay, this is perfect. Thank you, and all the best.
Thank you, Shreya.
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Renish from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi. Congrats, team, for the good set of numbers. Just two things again on this vintage risk slide. When we look at HL and LAP, for both these segments, we have seen a very stark increase in 90 + on sequential basis. Just wanted to know what is happening here. I heard you on this IT related issue on the HL side. More specifically on the LAP, what is happening? Also when we look at the used car also, there is some increase. Just wanted to understand, why our new book asset quality is basically inferior to our period-end book quality.
I am not sure where. See, if you look at page 24, you can see that small uptick in housing loans and kind of in LAP as well. Everything else is going down. As you can see, the overall numbers are down, not up. New business quality is all significantly better than it has been. Unless I am misunderstanding your question.
Yeah. I will just maybe repeat my question. Sir, I am referring to your slide number 23.
23.
In that slide, if we look at the used car loan, which is 5% of the book, there, last three quarters, our 90 + is 1.2%, which is flat.
Correct.
But when I look at the vintage risk slide, the same segment, used car.
Yeah.
There, the 90 + is actually running higher than the book quality, the period-end book.
Yeah.
I'm just wondering, does that mean the incremental business is being booked at inferior 90+?
Yeah. No, I understand what you're saying. This is a different metric. So, when you look at a full stock, what happens is you have clients who are zero days, zero months on book, one month, two month, three month, seven months, all the way till nine, 10, 11, 12, and then 23, 24, 25, et cetera. 12 months on book is about the peak of where risk is going to be at its peak. Right? But the full portfolio, when you see it'll have both the peak as well as a bunch of non-peak vintages out there. And hence the portfolio numbers are going to be lower than that because it's an average of many guys.
This metric, the horizontal metric, essentially just shows one vintage, one tranche, and looks at them when their risk is likely to have peaked, which is around 12-month mark, and says, "Okay, what is the risk level of risk?
Okay. Got it. So it's on a rolling basis, right?
It is on a rolling basis. Absolutely right.
Okay. Cool.
It is a static pool analysis.
Got it. I thought it is a static pool, 12 months and not rolling, hence. I understood completely, sir. Thank you so much. Going back to the same question, what Shreya asked on the NIM side. When we look at the growth business NIM, which is at 6.8%, and when we look at the company NIM, it is 6.5%. Also, as per our slide number 51, the legacy book share is just 1.5%. I just wanted to know, optically, maybe over next two to three quarters, your growth NIM should be the company NIM, which is obviously 30 basis points higher. Does that give you a natural hedge against the rising rate cycle and hence, despite the rising rate, our NIM actually should expand from here on, the only reason being legacy book coming down?
That is absolutely correct. Mathematically, that is bound to happen.
Okay. Got it. We are not too worried on the rising rate cycle, sir?
Not really. I don't want to be too cocky about this, but in our business, there are two, three natural hedges that exist on the rate cycle. One is this legacy book, the other is our recent ratings and hence our incremental cost of borrowing being significantly lower than what our book is and what our retiring debt cost is. These two things are material items, which provide a natural hedge against the rising rate cycle.
Got it. Maybe just last thing. Given we also heard one of the largest prime housing financers increasing their PLR rate just in the month of October. If that happens, then is that upside risk to our NIM?
Not really. I don't expect us to raise rates for customers. Because our rates are not increasing. So it would be unfair for me to just pass on a rate increase to customers when I'm not seeing that rate increase. So in our case, neither will ours increase, nor will we increase it for the customer.
Okay. Got it. This is very helpful, and best of luck.
Thank you.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Abhijit Tibrewal from Motilal Oswal Financial Services. Please go ahead.
Hi, sir.
Yeah.
Thank you for taking my question.
First, a clarification. If I look at our consolidated P&L, we had reported loan loss provisions and fair value loss in NIM of about INR 300 crore. While if I look at our growth business, there the credit costs are upwards of INR 400 crore.
Correct.
Just trying to understand, is there some write back from the legacy book or is it some other business subsidiary which is contributing to this?
No, it is all legacy book. Legacy book.
So basically write-backs?
Exactly. The write-back, the recover, which we are using to create other buffers elsewhere.
Got it. Fair enough. The second question that I had was around liabilities. While in the last two participants, you would remember they were all asking about margins and how they could trend in a rising rate cycle. But I could also see in one of your slides, you have mentioned you have about INR 29,000 crore of debt coming up for maturity next year.
Right.
Which are at a higher rate than your incremental cost of borrowings. Isn't that should, at least that maturing debt should bring down your cost of borrowings.
Absolutely right.
Irrespective of where your incremental is, there is also an element of-
Yeah. So [Non-English content] . So my gross cost of borrowing of the stock will come down.
Great. Got it. [Non-English content] This is also clear. Lastly, sir, if I look at this quarter, we have reported a 2% kind of ROAUM for our growth business, and we had given out an exit quarter target of about 2.5%.
Yes.
The long-term goal is to take it above 3%.
Yes.
Now with the retail OpEx to ROAUM already settling below 3.5%, credit cost stable at 1.5%, what are going to be the key incremental levers to bridge this gap from current 2%- 3% over the longer term? Basically, what I am trying to understand is how much of this improvement can come from operating leverage, margin expansion, product mix, credit costs.
Yeah. The big delta comes under three heads. One is the mix shift away from legacy towards everything else. But let us keep that aside for a minute. Let us just look at the growth economics for a moment. Within growth economics, there are two big drivers. OpEx will continue to come down. We believe there is another 30, 35 paisa that is possible over the next six quarters. Then there is cost of funds, your cost of borrowing kind of resulting in cost of funds. Then there is the whole mix thing of us becoming more unsecured. You saw me comment earlier that we are 21% unsecured today. We were 20% still two quarters ago. Now we are 21%. Eventually, we want to be 25%, 26% unsecured, right? That delta will happen over the coming quarters, right? Coming quarters and couple of years.
That will continue to happen. That will continue to push the margins. Basically, there is OpEx, there is cost of borrowing, and a little bit is this mix towards unsecured. Those are the main components that will get us there. You want to add, Vikash? Sorry, just give Vikash one minute too.
As you mentioned, we are increasing gold, which is a high yield product, and all this will come at the cost of mortgage product, which is low yielding.
Got it. Basically the mix, not just secured-unsecured, but also gold which is secured but higher yielding and higher margin.
Correct.
Got it. There was a last thing. When you look at the bureau data, are you seeing increase in delinquencies, particularly in lower ticket size loans? I am not referring to any particular product, but across products, lower ticket size loans, are you seeing delinquencies inching up?
You saw this very strongly in 2024, right? Calendar year 2024. You saw risk increases in the small ticket and not as much risk increases in the large ticket. That sort of shape of risk, which is small tickets are much higher risk than large ticket, that shape has persisted throughout. It has not changed at all. Even today, the small ticket in any product, whether it is PL, HL, LAP, just pick any product, doesn't matter. As you go up towards higher ticket size, risk is actually decreasing, right? The smaller tickets, risk is quite a lot higher. The situation is a little bit different in gold loans, where kind of some of the large end as well, risk is increasing. Our risk is higher. The shape is a little different in gold loans, but apart from that, in every product, smaller tickets are higher risk.
That has been the case. It was very steep in 2024. It's slightly less steep now.
Got it. That's all I had. Thank you so much for answering the questions.
Thank you, Abhijit.
Thank you. We have the next question from the line of Nischint Chawathe from Kotak. Please go ahead.
Hi, Nischint.
Hi. Hi, Jairam. Just a short one. If I look at your market rate linked borrowings, these would largely be linked to repo, right?
No. We almost have nothing which is linked to repo, but repo has a very direct impact on the 10-year G-Sec or some of the other rates in the market. [Non-English content ]
Got it. MCLR linked, which is I think around one-third.
Yes.
These would largely be linked to one year or one month?
It is largely one year, but we have some six-month also.
Okay. Because when you say that, last time around, I know you mentioned that the rate transmission took almost a year, then you took, I think a couple of months after that to transmit the rates. But looking at this profile, it appears that probably the transmission could be much faster this time.
Yeah. When I say last cycle, I actually mean the down part of the cycle. Down part of the cycle [Non-English content] generally transmission takes longer. Up part of the cycle, transmission happens a little bit quicker. You should expect to see that. Market rates already. But the way we are combating it, and the way you see many others combating it as well, is reduce market-linked borrowing. [Non-English content] Almost nothing we have raised from the capital markets, because capital markets have directly shown the increase in rates or reflected the increase in rates. We have basically moved our mix away from market-linked towards more MCLR-linked. This type of mix shift within liabilities is something else that you should expect NBFCs to do in the coming months.
Got it. Got it. Thank you very much. I think that was my question. Thank you.
Thank you, Nischint.
Thank you. A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and one to ask a question. We have the next question from the line of Anand Dama from Nuvama Wealth Management Limited. Please go ahead.
Hi. Congratulations on the set of results. I had a question related to ROAUM. You said that there are multiple levers which will drive the ROAUM to about 2.5%. How confident you are now that we have already entered into a rate hike cycle to get to that 2.5% AUM? Second is that, next year we have a headwind in terms of insurance commission capping. You said that there are mitigants which are available. Should we then, in that case, look at a flattish kind of ROAUM in FY 2028, given that we have this headwind from the insurance commission capping or you have a better number to guide over there?
Sure. Vikash, you want to take the 2.5% question and then I'll take the insurance?
Carry on, carry on.
Okay. All right. Vikash is being shy. See, 2.5% in Q4, we feel fine. I don't think there's much anxiety that we have around it. We feel pretty good and we have all the levers that we think we need to deliver 2.5% in Q4 of this year. For next year, we have not, of course, offered guidance yet. I did mention the 18 to 24 basis points gross impact. If we are able to mitigate it somewhat, let's say half of it we are able to mitigate it, that is still meaningful. Our hope would have otherwise been to actually get pretty close to the 3% number as we exit next year. But now with this, we have to now recalibrate ourselves. Let's see.
Let's see what we come up with. We'll be close enough as we exit the year. I don't know whether we'll get all the way there or not in light of the insurance capping thing, but we'll have specific guidance to offer in Q4. As of now, for the second half of this year, our confidence levels are fairly high.
We have not factored any impact of rate cost of borrowing to come down. Even if the rate continues at the current level, we're confident to achieve 2.5% for the exit Q4 2027.
Our cost of borrowing coming down. Correct.
Also, the insurance capping is a draft yet. It has not still come into as law and policy, so we have to see what happens.
Sure. Any initial discussions which are had with the regulator? Because you also have insurance companies, so I am sure you will have a far better understanding in terms of where the draft rules could be basically liberalized. Any thoughts for that?
Yeah. We are having conversations at multiple levels with the regulators, both as ourselves as Piramal Finance, but also as PLI, our life insurance company. So we have had multiple rounds of conversations that we continue to have. We will, of course, also be formally giving in our feedback next week to the regulator as asked for. The NBFC industry together is giving a representation as well through FIDC, so we are participating in that as well. So multiple levels of representation are happening. The IRDAI chairman has indicated openness to listen to the feedback and we all saw, I am sure, his comment that the intent was not to do anything very dramatic or very disruptive. So let us see what happens. I mean, your guess is as good as ours at this point.
Okay. The current environment is good enough for you to grow into unsecured loans? Or you believe that maybe you will just wait and watch and then press the pedal? I mean, any thoughts over there? Most of the unsecured loan products that you do.
Anand, you have seen us for a while. You know our philosophy on this. We do not take macro calls. We do not take decisions on everyday credit choices because of how the macro looks. We take decisions based on how the micro looks, how each sub-segment is looking like from its delinquency trends perspective, et cetera. Based on that, we change our credit risk criteria. Growth is an outcome of our framework. It is not an input to our framework. We are not targeting any growth rate. The growth rate is what it is depending on what our credit criteria are. As it happens, there is improvement that we are seeing in many sub-segments in unsecured, so our credit filtration changes are resulting in higher growth rate in that segment.
If tomorrow at the micro segment level risk starts moving in the other direction, our processes automatically will cut down growth rate. We will not have to make any macro choice in that regard.
Sure. Lastly, what percentage of your portfolio will be linked to rural customers directly or indirectly? Maybe to the farmers.
We have about INR 2,300 crore in exposure, which is primarily in the rural segment.
Okay. That is great. Thanks a lot.
Thanks.
Thank you. A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and one to ask questions. We have the next question from the line of Rakesh Kumar from Valentis Advisors. Please go ahead.
Hi, Rakesh.
Yeah. Hi, sir. Just few questions on the interest rate movement. Firstly, we have 60% of borrowings on a floating basis. So 60% of borrowing on the floating basis and 50% of assets on floating basis. This difference of 10%, does that mean that we would increase our lending rate by the higher pace as compared to the increase in the borrowing cost that we are going to have?
[Non-English content ] Just look at the absolute values. There is INR 56,000 crore of assets which are variable rate, and there is INR 51,000 crore of liabilities which are variable rate. Which essentially means that I have more assets where I can reprice up than liabilities where I will get repriced up. So essentially, it's positioned well for a rising rate environment.
Okay. Secondly, this credit rating improvement that we are anticipating and which might be going to happen. In the rising rate scenario, how well we are positioned with this event happening. So how much really would this help us in containing the, or reducing the borrowing cost? Because the rates are rising, so I don't know how much market will take care of the credit risk premium changing with the difference in the credit rating across the institutions.
Yeah. I'm sure you can just go to Bloomberg and look at our credit risk spread versus any competitor, any kind of AA+ player or a AA player. Pick anybody and look at our spreads over the last few months, and you will see clearly that our spreads have come down. There is no question about it. Our spreads are down 40 to 45 basis points over the last few months against any benchmark that you look at. We've shown on page 17 our incremental cost of borrowing and how it has actually reduced. So in a rising rate market, our incremental cost of borrowing is falling. That is happening because our ratings have gotten better. And this narrative is likely going to continue.
Okay. Thirdly, the expected change in our borrowing cost vis-a-vis our competition and the kind of makeup that we have on the asset side. How does this breakup mix putting us vis-a-vis or as compared to other competition when the rates are rising? Because any competition which is going to witness faster or maybe slower rate of change in the borrowing side, they might be slightly better off as compared to you. Any thoughts on that?
I will reiterate a couple of messages that I mentioned before. A, our variable rate assets are higher in absolute terms than our variable rate liabilities, which means a rising rate helps us. This is not true for many players in the competition. It is true for us. So that helps us. Number two, we have the tailwind of a rating improvement, which essentially means our credit risk spreads across practically all competitors, except those who themselves have gotten upgraded. Our credit spreads are decreasing and will continue to decrease. That is number two. Number three is that our retiring debt is at least 60 basis points higher priced than where we are currently borrowing. This again will not be true for most players in the market. These three tailwinds all help us in a rising rate environment.
Okay. Thank you, sir. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, that will be the last question. With that concludes the question and answer session. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Jairam Sridharan for the closing comments. Thank you and have a great day.
Thank you very much, everybody, for joining our call. Have a great festive season. Happy Dussehra to everyone, and enjoy Bajaj's call, I guess. Bye.
Thank you, members of the management. On behalf of Piramal Finance Limited, we conclude this conference. Thank you everyone for joining with us today, and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.