Welcome to this presentation where I-Tech walks us through the interim report from the first quarter 2025. With us today is Markus Jönsson, CEO of I-Tech.
So welcome to this webcast that is being broadcast from Mölndal today, where we are going to present the Q1 report for I-Tech. I will dive straight into our development and show you the rolling 12-month results, which continue to look very good. The positive momentum that we saw in the business throughout 2024 has continued into Q1 this year. We come to that in the next slide here, where you can see more regarding the strong start. Net sales then were up nearly 50% and closely trailing the record quarter Q4 2024. It amounted to approximately SEK 57 million. The quarter last year was 38 . A really solid growth there. We also see that we have a healthy increase in the gross margin.
This was according to the predictions that we were giving also, I think, during Q4 or the later part of 2024, which has to do then with our sort of optimization of our supply chain. EBITDA landed close to SEK 20 million, which is almost a doubling then, or up 76% at least over last year. Very good results there. Same with the EBIT, which was SEK 7.7 million. Cash flow plus SEK 26 million, and then puts us at a cash balance of SEK 126 million. Continuously very strong finances there. EBITDA margin landed on 35%, which was also, I think, a new record in that sense. However, we are seeing then that we have increasing headwind in terms of currency, and that's linked to our operational currency, the U.S. dollar, and sort of the depreciating value of the dollar versus Swedish crowns, right?
We see we have negative short, medium, but also longer-term effects on the business if this continues, right? That is something we will see increasingly throughout the year. Overall, we would say a very, very good and strong, solid opening to 2025. If we look at the geographical spread of sales during Q1, you can see that Asia even increased a little bit over the full year 2024. Now it is 99% of the sales to Asia and only around 1%, I think 1.3-1.4, to Europe. You can see that also the split between the countries in Asia has actually changed in Q1 compared to the full year 2024. During the full year 2024, approximately half of the sales was to the Korean market.
We have seen now a shift here in Q1 that actually Korea represents a third, Japan approximately a third, a little bit more, and then China growing strongly in Q1. Almost one third from China. That is a recent development, right? You can see that Asia is really, it is cementing, it is dominating as a region for us, right, and for sales. Now we come to sort of what is changing then. Definitely, I think it has been a turbulent start to the year, I would say, with the new administration in the U.S. and sort of all the executive orders, et cetera, coming out of there, right? We definitely see this impacting sort of the outlook and really impacting trade and the shipbuilding industry. We do not see it yet impacting our business.
That is, of course, what you see in the numbers, right? Really, we do see rougher seas ahead here. If we start with the shipping market overall, I mean, we are still in positive territory and we are sort of 17% over a 10-year average. We see now this is turning and that, for instance, is seen in charter rates then. What people have to pay essentially to get their goods onto ship, and the charter rates are falling. That is sort of an indication then that its demand is softening a little bit for trade, right? There was a very strong growth during 2024, right? The seaborne trade measured in ton miles, right, was growing by nearly 6%. That is the fastest expansion in 14 years. The growth in volume was 2.1%.
Of course, you could say the trade miles or the ton miles growth to some extent is, of course, reflecting that ships had to divert and take a longer route, et cetera, during last year's, et cetera. There has been a really positive momentum then that is shifting. We see that with the sort of the current policy landscape then, if you look, that North America will be heavily affected and at least that's the prediction from both Clarkson and from WTO that we have been sort of reading here in front before the report. What we see then or the predictions from these two institutions is that North America is expected to drop 12.6% in terms of exports and 9.6% in terms of imports during 2025. The U.S. represents about 12% of world trade.
All in all, it is subtracting 1.7 percentage points from the trade growth and turning the overall figure to zero or slightly negative depending on what source that you are reading here. Essentially from a prediction of an expansion, we are now moving into a sort of moving sideways or even going down. I think also the signals for a recession here can, of course, that means that this accelerates further. If we look at the deliveries of new vessels, which is important to us, and we will come back to that, I think, later on in the presentation as well, that has been a healthy growth. The projection is still that this will continue to grow in 2025 because essentially the ships that were ordered a number of years ago, those are the ships that will be delivered this year.
We saw that the contracting of new ships also grew very much during 2024, sort of up plus 42% in terms of deadweight tons, right? That has really slowed or even halted in the first months of 2024, 2025, sorry, as a consequence of all the uncertainty that we see in the market. Of course, you know it has been uncertain times in terms of placing, you know, making investment decisions and placing orders for new ships. There has also been an array of executive orders, right, from the Oval Office. Also then one concerning or relating to maritime shipping and U.S. trade and more specifically related to U.S. shipbuilding and sort of on penalizing, you could say on one hand, Chinese-owned, Chinese-operated, and Chinese-built ships with the potentials of paying port fees that are quite substantial going forward.
Of course, the longer-term idea with this is to stimulate shipbuilding in the U.S. The US.. today has very, very little part of the global shipbuilding. It is mainly, you could say, naval vessels and sort of domestic vessels that are being built in the US today. Really, this is a play to stimulate it. We see it more as a long-term play. A potential consequence of these USTR measures could actually be or benefit the other North Asian shipping shipbuilding countries like Korea and Japan, essentially because there is a specific penalty on Chinese-built ships, right? One way to avoid that is, of course, to place orders with the Korean or the Japanese shipyards in sort of waiting for the opportunity to actually build ships in the U.S. This is really a long-term play.
I think, I mean, the estimate is it's three to six times more expensive today to build a ship in the U.S. than it is to build it in Asia, right? It is really a long-term play and not something that we will see affecting shipbuilding short term. Talking about sort of the fundamentals then of the global fleet, I mean, the age profile and sort of this fuel transition that we are in is really expected to drive significant fleet renewal over time, right?
We see today then if you look in deadweight ton again, that about 42% of the order book now is alternative fuel capable, meaning then that you can use more sustainable fuels, although the majority of those ships are LNG powered then, so liquefied natural gas, which is of course not a green fuel in itself, but it has a lower CO2 emission profile than classic bunker fuels. Also, we saw a landmark meeting happening here in April in the IMO in this, what is called the MEPC group, where they actually then made an agreement on emission regulations more globally and also then assigned the price to the emissions of CO2, which is quite positive, you could say, for the long-term energy transition. It is something that is needed to sort of level the playing field, right?
Up until now, it has really been Europe taking the lead and going ahead and implementing then, for instance, the EU MTS , but also the EU Maritime Fuel Regulation that is coming into force this year, which is essentially mandating use of more renewable fuels going forward, right? This is a step in that direction also for the global fleet then. What we see then is, I mean, significantly more volatile sort of conditions, hesitations for people, you know, to place orders, and also then essentially some volatility and turmoil in terms of the established shipping routes and trade routes and also cargo being shipped. Essentially, it will definitely impact shipping going forward this year. However, if we look at I-Tech then, we come back to the small world, we see that the foundation of our value proposition remains strong, right?
If we bet then long-term, especially with the last comment there on the progress in the IMO regarding sustainable fuels. The maritime challenges, the key challenges that are facing, including really emission reductions, right? Also then more and more, and we saw that also from the results of this meeting, more and more regulations regarding the transfer of invasive species and thereby regulation for biofouling management. Of course, also the emissions to water, right? What type of coating solutions that you're using and how that affects the marine life is increasingly in focus going forward. This remains really strong and sort of with an aging ship fleet and a desire to transition to more green fuels, which are more expensive, definitely having a clean hull is increasingly important.
That has also been pointed out, I think, in this roadmap that we talked about previously as well from the IMO. Where better biofouling management has the potential actually to help improve the efficiency and lower CO2 emissions by up to 25% from the global shipping fleet today. We see a number of initiatives in that sort of direction as well, right? With the energy efficiency indexes, et cetera, and the carbon intensity indexes sort of being put into play and also being developed then going forward. A very clear path for the IMO and for global shipping so far and some good progress as well during Q1 this year. That is sort of, yeah, the case holders water, you could say. Then coming into I-Tech's world and the challenge of barnacles. Why are they such a challenge?
We talked about this a long time or many times before. This is essentially, you could say, a recap for our new listeners then. Barnacles, they really have a big impact on drag resistance and the friction in the water then for the ship, which increases fuel consumption or results in speed loss. Barnacles, they do thrive in most marine environments. Of course, the warmer the water is, the more activity you have. They essentially super glue themselves to the surface and are extremely difficult to remove. Essentially, when you try to remove them, you typically damage the ship's coating and essentially so much that you have to go and send the ship for repainting essentially afterwards, which means that then really the most efficient strategy is to prevent them from settling on the ship's hulls. That is where I-Tech comes in, right?
We talked about it in Q4 or the year-end presentation as well, right? What if a third of the global fleet actually was using 36% more fuel than needed just for a day? What would that mean in cost and emissions? What we presented then, I think already in February, was this slide, right? A new inducing data study that we conducted in the end of last year, beginning of this year, where essentially we asked Safina, a coating partner to ship owners, to look at their data. They essentially give advice and suggest solutions for ship owners, what type of coating to put on the ship. They were looking into the data sort of on the conditions of over 760 ships.
What they could see there when they came in for dry docking then, a third of those ships really had completely unacceptable levels of barnacle fouling, right? More than a third of the underwater area being covered in barnacles, which means then, yeah, 40% or more additional fuel if you want to sail at the same speed. What we also found in the study then was that the ships that were coated with Selektope had a significantly improved condition in terms of that. Almost no or very little barnacles in those cases. Today, actually then, we thought of showing you some data. What does this mean for a ship owner or ship operator that your ship is fouling and that you have, for instance, barnacles growing on the ship's hull? I want to show you some new data then.
First, we need to talk a little bit about vessel performance then. When we mean vessel performance, it's essentially, you know, you have a certain RPM on your engine and you can measure then what is the speed I get through water. You can look at that over time. That essentially, you get a plot like this. You can see a lot of dots sort of seemingly all over the place. Of course, there are a lot of things impacting the speed of a ship, right? The wind force, the wind direction, the waves, the wave direction, the currents, and so on, right? Hence, you will get this really scatter of data points if you try to measure then what sort of engine power results in what type of speed.
Essentially what you can see though is you see here the graph is speed loss is sort of on the negative X axis here. The lower you get, the more speed loss you have versus sort of your set speed. What is this ship supposed to sail at what speed with certain engine performance, right? You can see over time. What you see then is essentially a linear reduction in the speed over time, right? When you go into dry docking and you apply a new anti-fouling coating, then sort of that performance is gained back again. You know, the ship can sail faster through water and you started sort of a new round then of degradation, right? This is essentially why the ships really need a new coating then and sort of have to go into docking approximately every five years.
This is sort of a typical data set then for a ship owner. I was speaking to several performance monitoring service providers. Essentially, companies then that help ship owners to monitor the performance of their ships. They install essentially sensors and they have softwares and data models then to see how the performance of the ship and sort of the speed through water develops over time. What they told me, you know, looking at their data, one specific service provider here said, yeah, typically, you know, we have a lot of tankers and bulker ships in our fleets, right? What we see on average is, with all of this data, approximately they lose 7% of the speed over the five-year period. Of course, there is variation in this data set, right?
There you have some vessels that have, you know, premium anti-fouling coating that is really optimized for their specific route and the activity level that has close to no speed loss, right, during the five-year period. There are plenty of examples of sort of, you know, catastrophic examples. I mean, he mentioned one specific year. He could see a data set of a tanker that was idling outside the coast of Mozambique for three weeks. Essentially after that, they, you know, the speed was heavily impacted. They sent down divers to look and they could see that both the sides and the flat bottom of the ship had 30% or more cover of barnacles and slime and algae, et cetera, right? Essentially that ship would have to be sent to cleaning.
Most likely at the cleaning event, they would damage the hull coating so much that they probably would have to clean it again very shortly afterwards or actually consider an early dry docking for that ship because it simply would not perform. I mean, this data set is of course covered with different examples of ships and how they perform. You could say, okay, what does this mean for a ship owner in terms of trying to translate the speed loss then into money? We prepared a little case here just as a case of example. The rule of thumb they say is, you know, whatever speed loss you have, you can multiply that three times to sort of get an estimate of the additional fuel that you need to recover that speed.
Essentially a ship that has a speed loss of 7%, if I want to sail at the same speed, I have to increase the engine power and the fuel consumption three times seven, so 21% actually the fuel consumption then. Of course, that would have a massive impact over five years. The nice thing here is, of course, if it is a linear effect that happens over time, you can see then, okay, what is the impact, right? Let's say that the ship captain, he was just compensating all the time this speed loss, right, with increasing the engine power and increasing the fuel use. In the end, over this five-year period of time here, they would have overconsumed bunker fuel for a value of $1.8 million, right? Quite significant, right?
The other option that he has is of course that, okay, I, you know, will just sail slower because it's no problem. You know, there is congestion in the port anyway. We will have to wait when we get to Rotterdam, et cetera. We just steam along, you know, slower. That of course also has an economic impact. That economic impact depends if you are sort of a ship owner that yourself, you're operating the ships and you are doing sort of the trade service yourself, or if you are a ship owner that just charters your boat to others, right? Typically when you charter your boat, you have a fixed daily fee. I assume the quite low rate here of $15,000, which is, you could say, quite a low rate considering today's situational conditions in the market, right?
Anyway, then over this five-year period, you would have lost 45 days of productive time, right? That would have an equivalent value then of $670,000. Also substantial money, right, to be saved by having a better anti-fouling solution. Then you come to, okay, what is the trade-off then? What is the cost of a premium anti-fouling versus sort of a basic paint scheme on the ships? That could be an example we heard is up to $200,000, right? That is the difference that that can be. Of course, depending on the conditions of the market, you know, are there good rates or are there bad rates, et cetera? You know, what is the likelihood that the ship owner would put on a high-performing coating, right? It is always a balance.
You could say, is there enough money around to spend on service or do I have to save on that as well? Things that actually impact the ship owner's decision of taking a premium coating or not. Just to reiterate what we've said in the past as well, right? We do see an increased number of ship owners choosing premium anti-fouling coating. That has really grown its share in recent years. We expect that to continue as well because essentially the saving is really positive to do that. That leads me to the market outlook then. We in I-Tech, our solution then is used both for new builds and for dry dockings, right? We estimate then with sort of the 10% increase, there will be around 2,000 new vessels being put on the market this year.
The dry dockings, they simply follow, you could say, a regular scheme. They have to come in at least every 60 months. However, of course, there is some wiggle room here. Typically what you see with the ship owners now is that, you know, times are uncertain, the charter rates are dropping, et cetera. The ship owners are trying to postpone the dry docking as long as possible, right? To maximize the value that they can get because they know that the charter rates will go down, right? Let's wait and see, right? Not go in for a service event right now. Yeah, I mean, reflecting, you could say our sales, both for new ships or vessels and for dry dockings, then China is dominating. For new ships, then Japan and Korea are quite sizable markets as well.
That is something we talked about in the past. The opportunity for Selektope and for good anti-fouling technologies, we estimate to be around $300 million-$500 million overall. That is sort of the market that we're tapping into. Yes, for the newcomers, our solution is Selektope, which is a substance called medetomidine that comes out of pharma. It's used as a sedative in veterinary and human medicine today. It has the opposite effect on barnacles. It actually makes them temporarily hyperactive so that they cannot settle on the ship's hull. It does not kill or harm the barnacles. It's a temporary and non-lethal effect. It enables coating companies to make more innovative, you could say, better performing coating that has a lower also environmental footprint.
It is commercially proven now in use in six out of the nine largest paint companies. We hope to see number seven coming during this year. It is applied then to what we estimate a little bit more than 3,000 ships so far. We believe we have a very scalable business with plenty of additional potential then. I mean, 3,000 ships out of a global fleet of 110,000 ships, there is definitely room to grow. Our model is asset light. We have outsourced the production and we are looking into continuously optimizing, you could say, our supply chain and production setup. That is also what we are reaping the benefits of now in the gross margin. We are essentially a knowledge company. We are based on intellectual property, formulation, know-how, and sort of knowing the customers.
We have a really unique technology with Selektope. There is no direct competition today, but of course, other anti-fouling solutions are available in the market. We also cannot avoid this topic. I mean, to most of you listening in, you are aware of our re-registration process and the challenges that we have faced here in the European Union. We have continuously talked about that. What we know has happened now is that the Standing Committee on Biocide Products have had this meeting in March with the first discussion, you could say, with the member states regarding all that support that we got during the public consultation.
Essentially, all stakeholders were able to submit their comments, et cetera, to I-Tech's proposal and also describe sort of how they use Selektope and why, you know, if they believe it should stay on the market, et cetera, right? We did, as we have reported earlier, receive quite a lot of input in this, which we are very happy about. Thank you if you also took part in that. That is really important now. We expect this discussion, you could say, regarding the input and the way forward to continue now also in the June meeting going forward. The situation will become more clear towards the end of the year then. What is it actually that the European Commission is suggesting, sort of to give Selektope renewed approval or another decision, right?
What we also can say is that since the current approval of Selektope will end in June this year, we expect now that the Standing Committee on Biocide Product will announce that there is a temporary extension of the current approval. That is sort of a standard procedure that is done in all these cases because they typically, they drag out in time and they are not able to finalize their assessments in time. They extend then the current approval. That is of course, we will not lose our license to operate in Europe in the middle of this year because they have not decided it. That is something we are expecting now to happen in the coming month. That on the European situation, I think we are arriving then sort of at the outlook.
I think what I want to say here today, we really see increased uncertainty and market turbulence that is affecting the sentiment in the industry. People are avoiding taking decisions, whether that is to place orders for new ships or doing service events, et cetera. The market is sort of re-orientating itself in terms of global trade, right? Of course, the last word is not said here, but definitely it has an impact on our market, right? We have not seen much of it in the numbers in Q1, but we just want to flag that this volatility that we keep on talking about, that we have volatility in our sales over each quarter, right? The likelihood of that volatility has increased a lot under the current conditions.
Also, we see then, of course, the currency headwinds really weighing in on us during this year, right? The U.S. dollars, as I wrote in the report, has depreciated with approximately 10% during the first quarter. Let's see what happens then. I mean, we have not seen the effect of that in our numbers really yet, right? Really flagging for a worsening macro environment, right? It is really interesting how quickly this changes, right? When we presented in February, you know, the signals still overall looked all positive, right? Now that picture is really completely different. It just tells you a little bit of the volatility in the world that we are living in, right? Of course, besides that, we are looking forward to new customer product launches.
As I was mentioning then, we did announce in the beginning of the year another customer coming on board, and we expect them to launch products as well during this year. Also, as we talked about here a number of times, we have business development activities that really have accelerated then. We of course look forward and would like to present more details on this during the year. There is very good progress and momentum on some very interesting new growth opportunities for the company. More on that to come. We continue to work with the operational improvements, and we hope to be able to present sort of more on that during the year. You can see the effect also in the gross margins.
You could say now the advocacy regarding regulations and renewed approvals is becoming, you could say, more or less running business, right? We have sort of signaled during last year that we have taken on higher costs for that. I mean, we see that continuing for the good part of this year, right? Essentially the costs that we have associated with advocacy and new renewal of approvals, et cetera. That is what's in ahead. All right. That was actually the presentation, Frederik. I am eagerly awaiting and happy to receive your questions.
Thank you for this presentation, Markus. We have received some questions here for you. Could you provide any additional detail on what percentage of total net sales, CMP and PPG, accounted for during this quarter?
Yeah, we have talked about, you could say, diversifying customer base, right?
I mean, if you come from sort of like 2023, you know, CMP was representing 80% of sales essentially, right? What we saw during 2024 was really a diversification, right? Other customers really increasing the penetration and the use of Selektope, right? We ended the year essentially with CMP then representing 66% of sales during 2024. You could say a good solid progress on diversification. That trend is still there. We see actually the same result this year that CMP now in Q1 represents about 66% of the net sales. Meaning then that PPG is, you could say, in that increasing pool of customers that represents 33% of the net sales. I do not have the exact numbers now, unfortunately, for PPG, but you know, they are coming from a low base, right? We see them being quite successful and really increasing their sales dramatically.
I think, you know, stay tuned on that to see how that develops during this year. Essentially stable then, you could say, CMP 66%.
Thank you for that answer. I noticed that some major companies have been in the customer portfolio for several years, but still represent only a small portion of total sales. Should we expect these to scale up over time or how should we think about this?
That is definitely our ambition and what we of course try to convince these customers of, right? You're absolutely right that some customers, you know, they are using our product, Selektope, in some niche products, right? That are solving specific challenges, for instance, and have had, you could say, yeah, sort of a stable business for these products, right?
Our challenge is to convince them then to use them also in the mainstream products, sort of the higher volume products, right? That is ongoing. Of course, you know, the challenges can be related to technical and essentially they will have to reformulate and implement new technologies. That could actually be beyond only using Selektope, right? Because our product is highly efficient on, for instance, barnacles, but of course you need a protection that covers sort of all the different biofouling challenges. If you go in and make changes in the product, right? It typically takes customers some time to do this. We are working very actively on that and really it's our target that they would also grow their sales going, oh, sorry, their purchase of Selektope going forward.
Thank you.
Why is it easier to initiate sales for new builds compared to dry docking? What is the current share of each segment?
Yeah, it's a very good question, right? And sort of the success of Selektope really started in the new build segment because essentially you can see the effect very, very quickly. The bottleneck of new ship building is the dry dock. What the wharves are doing, they are sort of hurrying to put the ship together so it can hold water. They put it out in the dock instead, sort of outside the dry dock in the water. Then they complete the ship there. At that time, the ship is lying still in the water for between 6-12 or even 18 months if it's a very complex ship.
During that time, of course, the ship is sitting still in the dock. It is warm water. It is summertime. It is a perfect sort of condition for various fouling to settle on the ship as well, right? When the ship is ready, it actually has to pass the sea trial. They take the ship out to sea and they sail it, you know, they rush the engine, they test it and so on. It has to sail at a certain speed because that is what the shipbuilder has promised, right, to the customer. Of course, if you have a lot of fouling under the ship's hull, it will not pass these tests. Historically, what they had to do was to bring the ships up in the dry dock again and blast them and put a new layer of paint on.
What they can do with Selektope then is essentially they can skip that step. They can have the ship in the water and use specific outfitting paints they have, sort of with, you know, very strong good protection against fouling. The ship is ready and can be delivered when it is finished. It is a huge saving. It is easy to see the value of Selektope. For sort of the five-year period, you know, you can hear already there, right? It takes five years to see the effect of a product, right? That is why it takes longer in dry docking. Commercial sales for Selektope started in 2014. We are essentially now only two dry docking cycles down the road from when we were put onto the market, right?
Of course, dry docking is 10 times bigger than the new build, right? That is the segment where we need to increase the penetration. Hence the data that I was showing now regarding the effect of Selektope over a five-year cycle, right? Is very important to us, right? Because it clearly shows there is a lot of savings to use Selektope also over sort of the full five-year period, not only when you are building the ship in the dock.
Thank you. Do you expect the optimized production to balance out negative currency movements on gross margin in the coming quarters? Or should we expect a somewhat decreasing gross margin?
Yeah, sorry, Frederik. I think I forgot to answer a question also. The split between new build and dry docking, that was part of the earlier question.
Yes, it was. Please.
Yeah, sorry.
Yeah, historically we have said we had about 60-40, right? 60% new build, 40% for dry dock, with our internal target to really grow the dry docking business. For instance, the PPG product that we talked about is one such product, right? That is really targeting both new build, but definitely dry docking business, right? It is an important product for us. However, when we analyzed the numbers, we said we had very good growth in 2024, and specifically in the Korean market, where there is a lot of new build. I would say it is still 60-40, or even for the full year 2024, it could actually be a little bit higher even for new build. We are still analyzing the numbers on that.
It is, you could say, our growth, our untapped market is in the dry docking segment, and that's where we are working, you could say, both technically and directly with the customers.
All right.
Sorry, could you repeat, Frederik, the question on the gross margin just so I get it right?
Yes, of course. Do you expect the optimized production to balance out negative currency movements on gross margin in the coming quarters, or should we expect a somewhat decreasing gross margin?
Because of the currency, you mean?
Yes.
No, I wouldn't say we would see a decreasing gross margin because of the currency as such. I mean, the gross margin, I mean, our operational currency is U.S. dollars, right? We both buy, you could say, product and sell in U.S. dollars. That does not affect it percent , you could say.
I think we would see percentage-wise that we can continue to improve the gross margin.
Thank you. Next question. You talk about a slowdown in shipping orders and generally weaker shipping industry with rates down, et cetera. How and when would you expect this to impact I-Tech? Presumably it will not impact 2025 much, but could it impact you during 2026?
As I said, the likelihood that we see volatility in our business as well has increased dramatically. It goes really quickly in today's world, right? How things are changing. I would say that this year has, you know, it has become less certain where we will end this year, right? I would say this volatility already impacts the shipping business, right? Of course, we are, you know, upstream of that. I mean, already today there is impact.
We definitely would see it, I would say, this year, right? We do not know exactly how it will pan out. I would say already this year we should expect to see the effects of what the ongoing transformation on the global order.
Yeah. Can you give us an update on how much of your business was represented by CMP in the first quarter?
Yes, 66%. I think that was the first question as well. They sort of maintain a stable share in Q1 as well.
Thank you. Can you give us an update on how your business with PPG is developing? Is it growing strongly, but are you only presenting one product, I believe?
The fact is that this product that PPG introduced and launched during last year is their new flagship product, right?
It goes both for new build and for the dry docking segment. They apply, you could say, a little bit differently depending on if it is a dry dock or a new build event, right? It is really a flagship product. It is the product to be in for PPG. It is quite important for us. I think we also wrote that in the report. Sales with PPG is up like 300% if you compare it to Q1 last year. You could say that they basically launched the product during Q1 last year, right? It is up from a low base.
Do you think they may include Selektope in more products?
Yeah, we certainly hope so. If there will be additional products going forward, yes.
What's your base case on the gross margin going forward on the back of the currency movements headwind? Are we looking at closer to 50%?
No, I mean, we don't give a certain number estimate here going forward. I think that the target is to continue to improve the gross margin percent .
Yes, thank you. We have even more questions here. You did not specify the regulatory costs for this quarter in the report. But judging by the higher external costs both quarter- on -quarter and year- on- year, it seems they are higher than in previous quarters. Should we assume this elevated level will continue until a decision is made in the regulatory process?
Yeah, we shouldn't expect them to go down in sort of this year, no, exactly.
We expect it to continue to be on a high level, like you say, right now in Q1 level approximately. That is due to all the activities that are being done and linked to re-registration.
Thank you. Asia accounted for 98% of your sales this quarter, and China was the fastest growing market. What is your view on the potential for growth in the Chinese market future?
I think it's a massive opportunity to grow in China. I would say also with CMP, the existing customer, right, and also new customers. It's such an important market. However, I think we talked about this earlier as well. The conditions in China are very different from Korea when it comes to new build, right? Most of the Chinese shipyards are in river deltas.
They do not have the same problem with barnacles during new build or construction of ships that you have in Korea and China. You could say that the fundamentals of the business that sort of started for Selektope in Korea and Japan do not exist in China. Of course, the dry docking value proposition is still very strong, right? That is where the growth opportunity comes in China. I want to say also on the external costs as well, Frederik, yeah, I mean, we see sort of stable costs, I would say, on the regulatory affairs. I think we also see an increased cost, and that is also linked to our business development activities. We see that, you know, we are, of course, increasing our resources here and our efforts on business development.
That is another source of additional costs, right, for us going forward. It is not only the regulatory associated costs that are making the base or the growth of the external costs.
Thank you. The new product launches you mentioned, are these primarily for the dry docking market or new build market?
If we speak about this new user, the Asian coatings company, we cannot say yet. We do not exactly know the proposition of those products, right? We know they are in the making, but we do not know the details. Hopefully both.
Thank you. Could you elaborate a bit more on the expected currency effects coming quarters? Should we expect that the effect to hit more the coming quarters, or have you adopted a hedge strategy, for instance, for handling these effects?
No, I think we should expect increased effects going forward.
We do not have a specific hedging strategy. Of course, it depends on where the currency will go from here, or the exchange rate essentially, right? We have not seen really the negative impact to that extent yet in Q1. I think we will see more of it in the coming quarters of the year. Depending on how this develops, it could be even more pronounced effects.
Thank you. Can you elaborate a little on your customers' buying pattern? Are they building inventories in these market conditions, or is the top line predominantly driven by higher volume demand from end users?
Yeah, I would say predominantly the demand, right? Everybody wants to avoid building any type of stock, I would say, in the market conditions that we are in now, right?
Our customers do need a minimum stock level, right, to actually operate the business because it is not as predictable with the dry docking business as it is for new build, right? A dry docking event, you know, simply a ship owner can decide, you know, from, yeah, one week to another, right? Let's dock this ship, right? Let's see what is available, right? Of course, to be able to catch such a spot business in the dry docking segment, you need to have some basic level of inventory, right? If you are a paint company, right? You need that in many places because you do not exactly know where your customers will come in, right? It is basically demand. That is the answer.
Okay. You have a strong cash position. Where is that being allocated in the near future?
Yeah, we have a dividend payment that is proposed now by the board to the annual meeting. That is one thing. We will see. I mean, we need to have a strong cash position, I would say, you know, as to really secure the ongoing business, but also then, you know, to selectively invest in some of the business development activities that we have here. Of course, we are counting on the cash position we have to help us with that, right, going forward.
Thank you. How many of your six suppliers have included your products in their broader product lines compared to niche?
How many of the six active customers have included them in broader, sort of in more, yeah, in more than niche products? Yeah. Ooh, that is a good question.
I would expect three to four of them, but that was something I would need to check. But yeah, at least half, I would say.
Thank you. One last question here for you, Markus. Can you just develop a little bit on the macro and economics effects on new build sales relative to repainting at the moment?
Yeah. No, and good again that we reiterated. We do not see sort of the turbulence today affecting the new build short term, right? Because the ships that are being completed and painted now during 2025, they were ordered several years ago. The order books for the shipyards in Korea and Japan are, and I would say basically in China as well, are full, right? They have a lot of work in the coming three to four years.
Of course, you could say if there is a severe downturn, people may start to try to get out of the orders of the ships that they have ordered, right? You know, we have not seen any effect whatsoever so far of the turbulence, you could say, on the new build, but we accept that sort of the order intake for new ships has been really sort of hesitant in the first quarter, right? The filling up of the pipeline, you could say, four or five years down the road, that is what is being affected right now for new build. As I said, with the service event, that can be affected day to day, right?
If the rates for charter rates are falling, then, you know, the owner can decide to try to postpone because there is some wiggle room, right? You can wait six months with dry docking your ships. Let's do some additional runs while the business is still here, right? Also, we see that if there is a downturn and, you know, a softer demand, that's typically also when the ship owners do service events, right? Because then there is time, you know, you're not losing that much money. It can also be eventually a positive drive on the service and the dry docking business, right? I think the problem is that it's very difficult to say right now because there are many different signals sort of in pointing in opposite directions.
Thank you.
Is your cautious comment regarding the outlook based on actual observations so far in this quarter or the current quarter among customers or just a very general cautionary comment?
It's a strong generally cautionary comment and sort of, of course, speaking to the customers, yeah.
One last question. Have you noted any expansion towards retrofit repainting in your customers' product offering?
Sorry, Freddy, could you repeat that one? I'm not sure I can.
Yeah. Have you noted any expansion towards retrofit repainting area in your customers' product offerings?
More products, you mean in that area? Yeah, I would say we saw that trend during 2024. We hope that to continue, right? That we see more and more products that are targeting the dry docking or the service segment, right?
That was a trend that was happening or was positive during the whole last year and which we hope will continue also this year, right? That we will have more products than targeting the dry docking segment.
Thank you. That was every question we got in for today's presentation, Markus. Any last words for the audience?
No, I mean, thank you very much for listening in and for bringing forward such good questions. Yeah, I hope I did my best to reply to them. And, you know, thank you for the interest and confidence in I-Tech and see you in another meeting going forward, right? Thanks for today.