Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. Welcome to the UBS Third Quarter 2022 Results Presentation. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. Should you need operator assistance, please press star and zero. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Sarah Mackey, UBS Investor Relations. Please go ahead, madam.
Good morning and welcome, everyone. Before we start, I would like to draw your attention to our cautionary statement slide at the back of today's results presentation. Please also refer to the risk factors in our 2021 annual report, together with additional disclosures in our SEC filings. On slide two, you can see our agenda for today. It's now my pleasure to hand over to Ralph Hamers, Group CEO.
Okay. Thank you, Sarah. Good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to share good results with you for this quarter. Amid significant macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, we executed with discipline. We delivered CHF 1.7 billion in net profit, and our return on CET1 capital was 15.5%. Our capital position remains strong, with a CET1 ratio of 14.4%, as you can see. We managed costs well, leading to a cost income ratio of 71.8%. Our balance sheet for all seasons and strong risk management continue to be an asset for our clients and the investors. Turning to the next slide, where you have the overall overview of the commercial momentum. This quarter, I spent a lot of time with clients across the globe, and their feedback was really consistent.
They're concerned about inflation, about the energy prices, the war in Ukraine, residual effects from the pandemic. Economies are slowing down, central banks are raising rates at record pace, and that's affecting asset levels. It's affecting market volatility and investor sentiment across the globe as well. We expect this to continue at least through the end of the year. Client activity has been differentiated across segments. Institutional clients remain very active on the back of high volatility in foreign exchange and rates, but private investors generally remain on the sidelines waiting for signs of improvement. In all cases, our teams have stayed close to our clients, providing them with advice and solutions. You can see that snapshot here on this slide. We help private clients seeking opportunities to protect and grow their wealth.
They diversified their portfolio through mandate solutions and made additional commitments to private markets. As a result, for the need for guidance which we gave, we saw CHF 17 billion in net new fee generating assets coming in through the quarter. Wealth Management clients are seeking higher yielding products on the back of higher interest rates. We're capturing these demands through savings, through CDs and money market funds, and half of the CHF 16 billion of net new money coming in through asset management and money markets. Half of the CHF 16 billion in money markets is CHF 8 billion, actually coming from GWM clients. We also continue to actively manage our deposit offering and optimize net interest income, and that's where we saw 14% growth year-on-year in our deposit-taking businesses.
In lending, we've seen our clients deleveraging Lombard loans, specifically in Asia-Pacific, but we saw demand for mortgages in Switzerland and the U.S. The net impact is a loan book that was flat this quarter, excluding foreign exchange. As I mentioned, institutional clients continued to trade actively, and that resulted in another strong performance for Global Markets, given our mix and geographic footprint. We benefited from foreign exchange and rates volatility, which resulted in the FRC revenues being up 64%. We're impacted by equities being down. I think this shows our ability and flexibility to deploy resources across the asset classes, and that shows the value of the way we are organized.
It also kind of shows that our technology investments specifically in electronic FX are supporting a record quarter in EFX as well. As you can see, consistent execution of our strategy is driving organic growth despite volatile market conditions. Now moving to the more regional picture. That's basically where the execution of our strategy towards our clients really comes together. In the U.S., the economy is holding up relatively better than other regions. Consumer balance sheets and economic wellbeing, employment data are solid, but inflation remains high. As a result, we project Fed funds to peak at 5-5.25, and such elevated rates increase the risk of recession.
Interest rate hikes have reduced asset levels and muted client activity as well, but they have supported net interest income, which is up 38% year-over-year. That's on the U.S. and wealth management specifically there. Demand for separately managed accounts and alternatives continue to drive inflows. That fueled over 4 billion of net new fee generating assets mostly from our existing financial advisor base. We also had a strong quarter in advisory recruiting, and our hiring pipeline remains strong as well for the fourth quarter, and that should support inflows also through the fourth quarter and beyond. These hires underline our commitment to drive scale and improve the GWM Americas cost-income ratio, which was below 80% this quarter. You see the scale coming through there.
We remain firmly committed to our U.S. growth strategy, which is focused on personally advised clients. We will also continue to develop digital solutions with remote advice, within our existing technology budget. Now moving to Switzerland, our economists expect it to narrowly avoid a recession due to relatively lower inflation and limited dependence on Russian gas. That said, many of our Swiss retail and small business clients will also be impacted by disruptions across the rest of Europe, and we are focusing on supporting them through the energy crisis. The stability of our business in Switzerland is, by the way, demonstrated by a continued solid growth, CHF 2 billion in net new loans, CHF 2 billion in net new deposits, and CHF 400 million in net new investment products. A real solid performance in Switzerland.
Now moving to EMEA, that's where the macroeconomic and geopolitical environments is having the most significant impact, as you can imagine. Clients turn to us, as indicated earlier, for advice in these uncertain and unprecedented times. The net fee-generating assets on the back of that increased by more than CHF 6 billion in EMEA. We also completed the sale of our Spanish business and also the SFA Wealth Management business in Switzerland, and that further optimized our footprint. As you know, we are looking at further improvement of efficiency and profitable growth in EMEA. It's part of our strategy, and we're delivering it this quarter again. Lastly, Asia Pacific, we continue to believe that there is attractive structural long-term growth prospects in the region.
In the short term, it is clear that our clients are dealing with COVID-related restrictions still. That's delaying recovery also in the property sector. We think there is a path back to 5% economic growth in China and Asia Pacific as a whole at some point next year, but the question is really about timing. We expect these dynamics will restrict our clients' willingness to take on leverage, and also it will limit their willingness to transact at least through the end of this year. That said, they continue to look for us for diversification and investment expertise. As a result, we saw another strong quarter in net new fee-generating assets also in this region with CHF 7 billion of inflows.
Our annualized net new fee-generating assets growth rates in Asia Pacific is actually 12% year-to-date. In Asia Pacific's primary markets, we outperformed fee pools and took market share. We claimed the number one position in equity capital markets for non-domestic banks and led three of the top four equity raises in Asia Pacific, including Hong Kong's largest IPO in over a year. In summary, all of the regions are faced with complex macro geopolitical environments, but we're clearly showing to be very focused on supporting our clients and very flexible in the way we allocate our resources across the investment bank as well, and using our global footprint and diverse capabilities to continue to add value for our clients. Turning to slide six here for you, that demonstrates how the consistent execution of our strategy has delivered a good financial quarter.
Net profit at CHF 1.7 billion. Return on CET1 capital at 15.5%. Cost-income ratio, as earlier mentioned, at 71.8%. Of course, we will continue to be focused on efficiency and expenses, and our cost discipline will further intensify as we fight inflationary pressures, and we prepare for tougher times to come. Turning to slide seven. Given the environment that we're in, we felt it was important to give you a peek into the position of strength that we have facing some of these uncertainties. Our capital ratios remain well above our target levels at 14.4% in CET1 capital. We continue to operate with a significant amount of liquidity to support our clients and meet regulatory requirements as well.
Our balance sheet for all seasons is supported by a high-quality loan book. 95% of our loans are collateralized, and the average loan-to-value is less than 55%. We have a model that uses limited credit risk and has a high capital generative character. With that, we remain confident in our ability to deliver attractive and sustainable capital returns to shareholders. To summarize, we delivered a good performance in the quarter. Our capital-light model, our global diversification, the balance sheet for all seasons continue to be a real competitive advantage. In the first nine months of the year, we consistently executed with discipline, performed in line with our targets every quarter, and that gives us also confidence in our ability to meet our return on CET1 and cost-income ratio targets for the full year on a reported and also underlying basis.
With that, Sarah, over to you.
Thank you, Ralph. Good morning, everyone. We delivered a good set of results while maintaining a balance sheet for all seasons and against a complex market backdrop. Net profit in the quarter was $1.7 billion. Ralph just walked you through the reported profitability with return on CET1 of 15.5% and a cost income ratio of 71.8%. Our underlying profitability was not very different. Slide 23 in appendix walks through the items which are the same in nature as last quarter. Total revenue was down 10% against 6% over expense. FX impacted both by $300 million for a net effect of around $50 million. The net credit loss release was $3 million compared to a $14 million release last year, reflecting great stability in our credit metrics and strong risk management.
On slide 10, the macroeconomic environment reflected depressed equity and fixed income markets, low levels of client activity, subdued M&A and capital markets, and higher rates. Our revenue story mirrors those same themes. With underlying revenue, ex-FX down 7%. We had lower asset base and transaction fees, lower Global Banking revenue, but higher combined NII in GWM and P&C. Global Markets revenue was broadly flat against a very strong prior year quarter. Now, moving to NII on page 11. The drivers of NII have been consistent over the course of this year, with a strong benefit from rates, which you see in the first bar on the chart. Our actual deposit betas were better than we modeled. The rate impact was partially offset, as you see, by deposit volume and mix.
On volume, next bar on the chart, the impact was driven by GWM, where deposits decreased by $23 billion last quarter and $13 billion this quarter, both in line with peers. FX accounted for almost half of the $13 billion decrease. Regarding mix, we saw clients move from sweeps and current accounts into other UBS deposit products. In this quarter, on a net basis, we retained effectively all these assets within UBS, including over 60% in deposit products and another 25% in our own money market funds. Overall for this quarter, NII was up $223 million or 14% year-on-year. The US dollar increase in NII was 41%, but it was partially offset by a reduction in Swiss franc due to lower SMB benefits and deposit fees.
Looking ahead, based on the forwards, we expect approximately CHF 200 million incremental NII in the fourth quarter versus the third quarter, of which 2/3s in GWM and 1/3 in P&C. This would lead to a total increase of $1 billion in 2022 versus last year. We expect 2023 NII to be higher than 4Q22 annualized, given our exposure to Swiss franc and euro and no further SMB and deposit fee impacts. Our $ NII is expected to peak in 4Q22 or at the beginning of 2023. Now, turning to costs on page 12. This quarter's operating expense was down 6% year-on-year. Excluding litigation and FX, the number was down 1%, with inflationary pressures on salaries, T&E, technology, and consulting costs offset by variable compensation.
Year to date, on the chart on the left, expense was down 1% or up 1% ex litigation and FX. If you also exclude variable comp, expense was up 3%. For the full year, we see expense ex litigation and FX up around 1% year-on-year. We are on track to deliver an incremental $400 million in 2022 as part of our program to deliver $1 billion cost saves by 2023, as announced last year. We are laser-focused on costs, and in the context of the current environment, we have put in place specific measures regarding non-critical hiring, T&E, consulting, and tech prioritization. Let's move to our businesses on page 13, starting with GWM. GWM profit before tax in the quarter was $1.5 billion, down 4% against a record 3Q21.
It was down 10% ex FX and gains on sales in 3Q 2022 and 3Q 2021. Revenue was 4% lower than last year as market headwinds continued to challenge our asset base and transaction revenue in all regions. These headwinds were partially offset by net interest income, which was up 23% year-on-year and up 8% sequentially, as we continue to actively manage deposits across margins, volumes and mix. The operating expense, ex-litigation and FX, was down 2% versus last year. This demonstrates our strong cost control that allowed us to deliver a cost income ratio of less than 70% in GWM and less than 80% in Americas. Net new fee generating assets were $17 billion in the quarter, a 5.5% annualized growth with positive flows into self-directed mandates, SMAs, and alternatives.
Ralph walked you through the strength we saw across the regions, and for the past 12 months, we attracted $64 billion of net new fee-generating assets, which represents around a 5% growth rate. Net new lending in 3Q was negative $1 billion, driven by deleveraging in APAC. However, we saw continued growth in Americas and Switzerland. Looking ahead, while client sentiment is likely to remain muted in the fourth quarter, our existing pipeline will be supportive of net new fee-generating assets. Moving to Asset Management on page 14, with a profit before tax of $140 million. Total revenues decreased by 13% or 8% ex FX, with lower net management fees driven by market headwinds and lower performance fees.
The cost income ratio was 73% up year-on-year, with lower revenue and expense broadly flat as we benefited from FX and continued to invest. As Ralph mentioned, net new money was strong in the quarter at CHF 18 billion, of which CHF 16 billion in money market funds, with significant wins in the U.S. and EMEA. Excluding money markets, net new money was $2 billion, driven by fixed income. Now on to slide 15. GIB delivered $447 million in profit before tax and a 14% return on attributed equity. These are solid results considering our revenue mix and geographic footprint. Thanks to our capital light business model, we can operate with an RWA density of 30% compared to our estimates of around 50% for our U.S. peers.
Revenue in Global Markets of CHF 1.7 billion was down 1% or up 2% ex FX against a very strong prior year quarter. If you think about the environment, it was one where volatility in equities was lower than in FX and rates. In that context, we had a record third quarter performance in EFX, FX, rates, and prime brokerage, offset by reductions in equity derivatives and cash. Global Banking revenue was down 58% to CHF 329 million, in line with very low levels of industry activity across advisory and capital markets. The operating expense was up 3% ex litigation and FX, largely driven by inflationary pressures on salaries and higher technology expense. On page 16, moving to P&C, which had strong momentum and an 8 percentage point year-to-date increase in share of personal banking clients that are active mobile users.
Profit before tax in the third quarter was CHF 430 million. Total revenue was broadly flat year-on-year, as increases in recurring and transaction-based income were offset by lower NII. Transaction-based income increased 2% on higher revenue from FX and credit card transactions, reflecting higher spending both on travel and domestic. Recurring net fee income was up 3% on the back of more than CHF 2 billion of net new investment products over the past 12 months. For the quarter, in personal banking, net new investment products had an annualized growth rate of 8%. The credit loss release was CHF 15 million, compared with CHF 6 million a year ago. Cost ex litigation were up 4% as we continue to make investments in technology to execute our digital strategy.
Finally, on page 17, we maintained a strong capital position this quarter, well above our guidance, while continuing to distribute capital according to our plans. As of the end of September, our CET1 capital ratio was 14.4% and our CET1 leverage ratio was 4.51%. Turning to the CET1 capital ratio walk, starting at 14.2% at the end of last quarter. Net profit contributed 60 basis points, partially offset by capital returns to our shareholders of around 40 basis points. The net currency effect was nil quarter-on-quarter as the FX impact on CET1 and RWA offset each other. Our capital return story remains strong. We increased our dividend accrual from $0.51 - $0.55, a 10% year-on-year increase. We're on track to buy back approximately $5.5 billion of shares for the full year.
In the first nine months of the year, we have repurchased $4.3 billion, and as of last Friday, the number was $4.6 billion. This translates into a payout ratio of 94% year-to-date, including dividend accruals and buybacks. To conclude, while no one is immune to the macro environment, UBS is well-positioned to face short-term challenges. We have strong capital returns, diversification and limited credit risk. This is in addition to NII tons across currencies and expense flexibility. We are executing our strategy and focused on delivering consistent and attractive returns to shareholders. With that, let's open up for questions.
We will now begin the question and answer session for analysts and investors. Participants are requested to use only hand raise when asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question comes from Stefan Stalmann from Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. Thank you very much for the presentation, for taking my questions. I wanted to ask please on your cost guidance. You had previously said that cost might be up by 2% for the year on an FX adjusted basis. Now you're saying it could be plus 1%. Could you maybe talk about what has changed? Have you reassessed variable compensation? Have you slowed your investment spending plans or anything else to consider? The second question goes back to what you said about NII in 2023, Sarah. I missed what you said exactly. You talked about an annualization and that NII next year would be higher than an annualized number, but I missed the basis. Could you maybe repeat that for me? Thank you very much.
Yeah, sure, Stefan. Sarah, on cost.
Yeah. On cost, we gave the guidance that we would be up 1% ex FX and litigation, and that is in line with where we are for year to date this year versus a year ago. In terms of the 2% guidance that you're referring to, this was done ex variable comp. On that basis, we are approximately at 3%. We will expect to continue to work on being below 3%, but we're still rounding to 3%.
Yeah.
What's happening here is that you're seeing very strong cost discipline with the reported and ex FX and ex litigation story. You're seeing that we're managing the entire cost base, but we're of course seeing some inflationary pressures that were higher than those that we were projecting at the time when we gave the guidance.
Yeah. On NII, it's literally as follows. We see uptick on NII dollar rates coming through, but euro and Swiss francs and pound rates coming through also in the fourth quarter. With that increasing our NII guidance there by another CHF 200 million. Then how to look at that from a 2023 perspective is that we are indicating that that will continue. The uplift there will continue in the different currencies, more so than in the U.S. dollar, because we expect that to peak in the fourth quarter, maybe beginning of 2023. Therefore, for 2023, you should start thinking about the annualized number for the fourth quarter, so 4 times fourth quarter with upside. That's the way we guide it.
Great. Thank you very much. Very clear. Thank you.
The next question is from Amit Goel from Barclays. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thank you. I have one question on the NII guidance. Again, just to check, when we talk about the CHF 200 million and/or the CHF 1 billion and next year, what kind of mix effects and/or deposit flow assumptions are in that? Then secondly, just kind of curious if you wouldn't mind just going into a bit more color in terms of the costs, which are the areas where maybe you've kind of honed in some of the spending, what impact that has and also how you're thinking about investment into Asia as well at present. Thank you.
Well, Sarah can give you some more insights on the NII. We kind of go ahead.
On the NII, we already gave you a lot of information with guidance in the fourth quarter as well as additional directional guidance for 2023. If that's okay, we'll pick up with even more than that next quarter when we report earnings. We feel that the exposure that we have with half of our balance sheet being in U.S. dollars, but the rest not being in U.S. dollars, gives us upside in those other currencies that is worth mentioning to you at this point.
Yeah. Now on the cost and also on Asia specifically, but also on the cost, what Sarah was indicating is that we are really focused on the cost side. We have been the whole year. Clearly, we had inflationary pressures that at the beginning of the year nobody had foreseen, but nevertheless, we managed a tight ship here. Also in the fourth quarter, as she was indicating, we really want to be very clear, making sure that we don't impact the strategic investments, nor that we don't impact the good costs, but that we are very strict on non-critical hires.
We continue hiring, but only for the critical hires, because we want to hold back on some that we have to be more careful around T&E and consultancy costs as well. It will not be kind of impacting the strategic projects at this moment in time, and looking at further prioritization in the technology budget. Those are the four areas we're very much focused on. Into your question around Asia. Now Asia, we know always go through bigger downturns and upturns than anywhere, but the underlying current is always positive.
Specifically, if you look at it from a wealth pool perspective and a wealth pool development perspective, and that's the underlying basis for our strategy in Asia-Pacific, we expect this to grow over time, anywhere between 5%-9%. It is an area where we want to continue to grow, where we see CHF 7 billion of net new fee generating assets just for the quarter. We expect some of the flows to continue as well. It's an important region for us to continue to invest in the wealth business, as well.
Thank you. Sorry, can I just follow up? Just Sarah, just on that point then. There are some volume and mix assumptions within the CHF 200 million.
Yes.
It's not a static balance sheet assumption. Okay.
That's right. This is not a static balance sheet. This is guidance.
Thank you.
The next question is from Anke Reingen from Royal Bank of Canada. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thank you very much for taking my question. It's basically just around the costs. Thank you for giving the nine-month trends on the costs as FX and litigation. I was wondering if you can give us the revenue equivalent on an FX adjusted basis for the nine months. I hear you on strategic investments, but do you see any need to potentially, at what point of draws, what you're thinking considering of further actions on costs? I think you mentioned in terms of the U.S. offering all the costs will be included in your current budget. Can you just confirm that and how you're going on about your building out the U.S. offering without the Wealthfront acquisition? Thank you very much.
Sure. You go ahead.
Yeah. On the revenue ex FX and the gains were down 7%, and we actually put that on one of the slides, the revenue slides. Yes. Hold on. That's the revenue slide.
Is that nine months?
That's the year-on-year.
Go back.
Um.
That's the one.
3Q21 versus 3Q22. For the nine months, I can pull it for you. There was even more effects on the revenue this quarter than last quarter, although last quarter there was some too. We can come back to you with the exact math on what the effects was for the nine months.
Okay. Anke Reingen, on your calls or investments in strategy and also as to the US very specifically. Clearly, draws are important, and we will not continue to invest in areas where we don't foresee growth to come through, right? We are committed to the strategy as we laid it out, and that foresees a continuation of technology investments as well. We have not really increased our technology investments even this year. We have been able to generate quite some room in terms of the efficiency of the technology investments through Agile. That's where we create the room to continue technology investments that are underlying quite some of our strategic initiatives, both in the investment bank, as well as on the wealth side and in P&C.
Now more to your question in the U.S. Clearly a change of tactic is not a change of strategy. The US is a very important region for us. It's the largest wealth pool in the world. We expect this to continue to grow over time by around 5%. That's why it is a focus of our strategy. That's why we will continue to invest there. And the investments that we are making in the U.S. are first and foremost to support our financial advisors, basically in what we call the personally advised segment, where we need further digital enhancement in terms of supporting them in the work they do, the workstations, the processes behind fulfilling the needs of our clients. It is about developing more banking products and also to deliver those digitally.
You've seen this quarter that we've been quite successful in developing additional banking products more on the savings and the deposit side. That's very important there as well. The banking products to support that part of our strategy in the U.S. Looking at the higher wealth segment, the family offices, to do more bespoke business there by a very good combination of what we can do from the investment bank perspective and the coverage on the wealth side. That's also there. On the digital first and remote advice, that's a business that we do already. We have quite some remote advice and wealth management advice centers activities already. That's for the lower wealth band, so to say.
That's where we'll continue to invest as well to support that business that we have there, which has always been the idea. That will all continue within the plans and the tech budget that we have.
Okay. Thank you very much.
The next question is from Adam Terelak from Mediobanca. Please go ahead.
Morning. Thank you very much for the questions. I had one on understanding the flows picture and then one on capital. Clearly net new fee generating assets are very strong. I just wanna understand how kind of the flows into money markets fits into that. You mentioned how much is being captured in Asset Management, but is that included within the fee generating asset flow print in GWM? Just to understand that and kind of some of the deposit moves against some of your mandated business within GWM would be great. And then secondly, on capital, clearly the demand for your balance sheet from your wealth clients is much lower than you may have anticipated when you put out plans earlier in the year.
I just wanted to hear kind of an update on your thinking on balance sheet deployment against kind of excess capital and buybacks and how that might change given clearly there's a much lower demand for your balance sheet in the more uncertain times. Thank you.
Thank you. On the flow side, net new fee generating assets, that is truly so the CHF 17 billion, of which more than that is actually into the mandates, so that's not the money market business of asset management. It is including the SMA business in the U.S. For example, in the U.S. you see, actually the number is CHF 4.4 billion of net new fee generating assets coming through in the U.S. 4.9 billion of that is in SMA business. The money market business is outside of these numbers.
Any color on what the flow's a bit into in, given the uncertainty?
For the fourth quarter, you can expect some continuation, for example, in Asia Pacific, but certainly also in the U.S. on the back of a strong quarter in terms of hiring financial advisors, both in the third quarter and continuing also in the fourth quarter. You can assume that that will support flows also in the fourth quarter.
Going to your capital questions, maybe if I lay out our capital priorities, that might be helpful. It's as it was, maintaining a balance sheet for all seasons, including, of course, our regulatory requirements, investing in growth opportunities, offering a progressive dividend, and then distributing excess capital to our shareholders. You have seen us deploy exactly like that in this year where we have supported our clients, but also you see, for example, this quarter reduction in our risk RWA and in the IB RWA, which is what we believe is the right decision to make on a risk-adjusted basis. You have seen us, for example, reducing by 46% our LCM book, and we have done that.
On the flip side, you have seen us increasing done in a cautious but absolutely open for business way in GWM or in P&C. Those are things that we have done. Of course, the deleveraging in Asia is affecting also the reductions in the lending. We are open for business. We want to maintain this balance sheet, but that can also support our clients. In fact, our clients are seeing us as a source of strength. We have done 94% of capital return, if you take the guidance I have given you plus the dividend for this year. We continue to expect to have material share repurchase and a progressive dividend for next year.
Thank you very much.
The next question is from Flora Bocahut from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. I have two questions on the NII again, please. The first question is just a follow-up on the guidance that you provided for 2023. You know, where you said that, we basically can consider four times the Q4 NII result size. Is that guidance based on the group NII, or is it based on, the sum of GWM plus P&C? And actually NII is lower than, the NII in GWM plus P&C. Is that because of the accounting asymmetries in the group functions? And if so, how do you expect these to evolve, in the coming year for 2023, specifically in the wealth management business? Whether I do Q-on-Q or year-on-year, it's now hardly growing anymore. What do you expect in terms of loan growth?
Clearly, as Sarah was indicating, we are open for business and specifically the Lombard doesn't have a very high risk normally. For the moment, with markets going down, we see pick up, but I don't expect markets to really go up very fast next year. From that perspective on the Lombards, one could maybe see some loan growth coming through in what we call the global family and institutional wealth business. We're setting that business up as you know, across the globe. That is a little bit more chunky, that business. It's larger loans as well. This may not be kind of a perfect trend quarter on quarter, but some deals may come through there, that would add to the loan portfolio in wealth.
On the mortgage side, that really depends on how the economies develop really. We'll see. I think the summary is overall a subdued demand for loans. That's what you could expect next year with some more maybe a more spiky profile in terms of the quarter-to-quarter development on the back of the successes in global family and institutional wealth business.
In terms of your question on NII. All of the numbers we have covered were for GWM and P&C. If you look at the total group on the difference is not accounting asymmetries, which is in instruments at fair value, which is not in NII, but IB. It's really an accounting. We report it to you when we give you global markets, and when we give you banking, there is a component of NII and there is a component of the other fee pieces.
For you to think about it is much easier to think about the spread businesses in terms of NII, that's GWM and P&C, and then the markets businesses in terms of the volatility and what we're seeing in the macroeconomic environment as well as banking based on the wallet that we are seeing. That's the nature of the guidance that we have given you.
You can track it because we report as such.
Thank you.
The next question is from Jeremy Sigee from Exane BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.
Thank you. I just wanted to follow up about Asia Wealth Management, please. Thank you for the comments earlier on. You talked about caution from clients in terms of their appetite for leverage and transacting, and I just wondered if you could put in context the strong net new money flows relative to that. You know, clients are not interested in leverage or transacting. What's the nature of these flows? What's the source of strength? I mean, is it flight to safety or capital out of China? What sort of how would you characterize those strong net new money flows against the backdrop of caution? Sort of following on from that, you talked about caution remaining at least through to the end of the year.
I just wondered if you're seeing any signs of stabilization or improvement or really we're just sitting and waiting for the time being?
The last question on what?
The broader mood.
Oh, the broader mood. Okay. Thank you. The Asia flows, 6.6, so almost CHF 7 billion of net new fee generating assets there. It's, I mean, the real underlying trend there is that clients are seeking more guidance and therefore they're more open to do mandate business with us, moving away from their own transactional behavior. You know, the transactional business is not necessarily caught by the fee generating assets, and therefore you see clients moving to get more advice and do more mandate business with us. It's not necessarily a flight to safety. It is a flight to advice and guidance in a period in which it's more about trends rather than the occasional opportunity.
That is a bit of a change of behavior that we see in our client base, and we're very happy to be able to cater that as well. Over time, and certainly if things kind of bottom out or at least are more predictable in 2023, we would expect some of the transactional business on the back of the change in behavior to come back in Asia as well. Now, the overall mood, Jeremy, yeah, that's a very interesting one. I think-
particularly in Asia. Sorry. I was meaning particularly in Asia, sort of whether the mood
Oh, okay.
The broader sort of confidence among the Asian clients, 'cause you said, you know, don't expect much improvement until the end of the year. I just wondered, sort of are there any signs of improvement yet, or is it still just too early?
No, that's too early. Maybe the kickoff has been the confirmation of Xi as the president for another five years, which at least gives us predictability around how policies will develop in China. We do expect, you know, the COVID measures to be lifted over time, not very quickly because, you know, until the New Year's, that may still be kind of a moment of caution, because people like traveling and see families. Thereafter, we would expect some, you know, some lift of measures there, as well. Further continuation of further support of the property sector should help as well.
If we're through that, we would expect some more positive signals to come through and support for the Asian economic development. Therefore, we do think it will go back to 5%, Asia and then specifically driven by China, as you know. The timing of that is really the question.
Okay. Thank you.
The next question is from Magdalena Stoklosa from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. I still have question about this kind of the sources of flows, net new money, flows this quarter because, of course, you know, the numbers have been very, very strong. Can I just kind of tackle it from slightly different perspective? When you look at those flows in the third quarter, is it existing or, you know, is it new clients? Is there a certain level of concentration in those kind of flows across geographies, or is it, you know, kind of much more broader-based, I suppose, you know, particularly in APAC, but maybe also the underlying EMEA trends because that number was also quite strong.
My second question is on your kind of IB expectations because of course, you know, fixed income trading, particularly on the macro side for the industry, for yourself, have been kind of very strong over the last kind of nine months in particular. I'm just curious, you know, how do you think that kind of higher for longer interest rate environment will look like for that fixed income trading into 2023 as the kind of, as the higher rates kind of settle in and the volatility potentially comes down a little bit. I've heard you this morning kind of talking about advisory unlikely to return in the fourth quarter, but how do you think about your advisory business into next year? Because, of course, mix wise, it's very important for you.
Thanks so much.
Oh, Magda, there's a whole slate of questions right there. Okay. I'll try to make a beginning here. So on the flows, it's literally a combination of existing clients being more interested in doing managed business with us, specifically in Asia. That's where we see that change. In EMEA and in the U.S., the U.S. particularly driven through the success of our SMA business as well, and EMEA is also new clients coming on, and Asia, by the way, is also new clients coming on. So it's a bit of a mix back. This is about net new fee generating assets, by the way, Magda, not net new money, right? So we do separate those two concepts and 'cause net new money may not be net new fee generating assets or the other way around.
I want to kind of caution that we really stick to our definition of net new fee generating assets, which basically means it is about assets that we manage on behalf of our clients, whether it's inflow coming through, new money coming into a mandate or dividends being paid within the mandate and staying within the mandate. That's the way these assets grow. That's important. On the fixed income business, specifically, more on the FX business, that's basically where we really profit. Clearly, you know, we
In the second quarter, we already indicated the shift from the market and specifically for our franchise, an important shift from what we would call micro, which is more the equities business that we are really leading in globally as well as you know, to more the macro, which is the fixed income and the rates business, that we have a very high exposure and we have a very strong position in the foreign exchange business. That's where we have profited from our institutional clients being very active on the back of the volatility there. Now, these rates will continue. They will have their effect on FX as well.
The combination of that and with that, the resources that we have moved from the equities business and some of the leverage we use for that business, depending on how the market develops, we will continue to profit from it. Where the market is going, honestly, I don't know. I really don't know, Magda, on that one. On the banking business, more on the capital markets business, yes, what I said this morning was more that, given where the market currently is, the volatility in the market, the fact that there is a bit of a risk of risk-off behavior on the investor side that you know with six or seven weeks to go in this year, because basically you should.
I mean, we probably have the first week of December, but thereafter markets are normally closed anyway, so we have six more weeks. I don't think that business will perform well. The markets are just not there. In the next year, I think it will take quite some time for the confidence to come back in the market. That's one. There will be investor appetite, but then you still need also the ones who need the capital or want to sell their business from that perspective, to be able to accept the fact that it will go at lower valuations, because the high valuations are still fresh in their mind.
It may take some time as well before they have turned the corner around accepting lower valuations for the capital markets business. And once there, you will probably see the supply and demand coming back and getting a better market situation. I would be surprised that going into the first quarter, that the first quarter would be good there. I don't think so.
Thank you very much.
The next question is from Kian Abouhossein from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Thanks for taking my questions. Two questions. One is on costs, just coming back to the numbers. I'm just thinking 2023. I recall under current, the guidance was that the cost growth of 2% plus minus variable in 2023 should not be too different. I was wondering, can you reconfirm that? Clearly things have changed in terms of inflation outlook, etc . Does that kind of indication still hold, first of all? Then the second question is on cost income target of 70%-73%, which you're clearly making this year. Can you run me through your kind of stress scenario since you have a lot of mark-to-market revenues?
How you think about the offset that you can take in order to bring yourself back towards that level or even close to that level, so we can understand how the dynamic would work on your controlling the cost?
Sarah?
First of all, in terms of how we think about expense, our primary lens is cost-income ratio. We are currently in our planning phase for 2023, and you can be assured that we are intensely focused on being within our targets, and we're looking at that in different scenarios. To your point, we actually are looking at actions that we would take if the environment deteriorated significantly from where it is today. We mentioned, for example, that we're executing this $1 billion-dollar growth expense save, that we're on track for the $400 million that we had planned for this year. We've executed the $200 million of last year.
There is $400 million that is planned for next year. Those saves can be reinvested, and that's what we have done so far. We don't have to. That's one of the levers, for example. Ralph and I both talked about on the levers that we are already taking, the non-critical hires, the T&E consulting, making sure that our prioritization is very intentional for the tech investments. That we're doing already. Then, if we need to do more, as we said, we will. If we do it too early, there is an optionality cost to that.
Just on, should we think about the times of absolute cost guidance is not relevant anymore? We should think from now on, going into 2023 around cost-income targets?
The primary lens is definitely cost-income target. Once we give you the guidance, if we think that there is anything complementary that would be useful, we will. You see, for example, that this quarter, we are giving you a guidance to make sure that you can be helped as you prepare the fourth quarter.
All right. Thank you.
The next question is from Piers Brown from HSBC. Please go ahead.
Good morning, everybody. I've just got two questions. First off on the U.S. wealth strategy. So you said you're still investing in tech platforms and new client segments, and given that Wealthfront is not proceeding, but we've seen a very significant pullback across tech valuations, how are you thinking currently about opportunities to expand via M&A going forward? The second question is just on a topic which came up on the 2Q call, and I see you've highlighted again in the outlook statement of the 3Q report, but the change to Swiss liquidity requirements, which I think became effective in July. Have you got any better clarity in terms of how that may impact the P&L as we move into next year? Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you. Piers, on the wealth business in the U.S. We were never really looking at getting into new segments per se, right? We have a lot of clients in what we would call lower wealth bands, $250,000 to $1-$2 million. That's one. We have two million clients in work-based wealth. Those are segments that we already cater for which we feel that we have to be more efficient in terms of how we deliver our services, but also that we need to have a service to keep those invested assets with us.
Clearly over time, if you have an appealing digital offer in view of the generational transfer of wealth from even wealthier customers to the next generation, you should also be able to keep that in-house. It's not necessarily that we're looking for new wealth segments. This is about the segments that we're already in and making sure that we have the right offer for those segments as well. Now, even on the personally advised, which is the core of our business there, we need quite a lot of technology investments in order to support them in the way they advise their clients, their workstations, the back office. The banking business that we're developing is a lot of technology investments as well.
Across the different segments that we cater for, we will continue to have high technology investments in the U.S. in order to get better productivity and a better user experience.
On the Liquidity Ordinance, as you know, it became effective in July 2022, and there is a transition period of 18 months. The way I think about it is if you look at our current level of liquidity, they are very high. When you think about the change in the minimum liquidity requirements, that would be not from the levels of cushions that we have today. We have this level of excess liquidity. Therefore, when you think about the balance of the two, we don't think that it should have a material impact on our profitability. We're certainly in discussions to continue to make sure that we get the full clarity on the second phase of the implementation.
Great. Thank you very much.
The next question is from Nicolas Payen from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. I have two questions, please. The first one is on RWA, and I wanted to know if we should expect any regulatory inflation for Q4 this year, and maybe also into next year. The second one is coming back on your sharp increase in client advisory in Americas. I would like to know whether or not this trend will continue in Americas and especially in other region, and if you have already witnessed some flows coming from this advisory in America. Thank you very much.
On the regulatory cost inflation, we have all of that embedded in the numbers that we are giving to you. There is always additional things to do, and we are reflecting that in our cost base, but we're not pointing to specific growth in that regard. Of course, all the critical hires that are necessary for that, we always prioritize. In terms of the growth in the FAs, we did have a strong recruiting quarter, which Ralph pointed out. We also have a pipeline which Ralph also talked about. We are not being more specific about what level it might be going forward. This was a very good recruiting quarter.
Thank you.
The next question is from Andrew Coombs from Citi. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Two questions, please. Firstly, on the NII sensitivity, in your prepared remarks, you talked about the deposit beta being better than expected. At the same time, you've seen quite a significant offset from a mix shift in the deposit base. Perhaps you could elaborate on your expectations on the impact of deposit mix shift going forward into 2023, and how much of an offset that might provide. My second question would just be on the net fee generating assets, the demand you're seeing both in asset management and wealth management. You talked about an increase in demand for CDs and money market products following the move up in rates and the additional yield that's providing. Are you seeing a mix shift within the existing client base as well into the lower margin products?
Anything you can say on the average fee margin on those versus the broader asset base would be helpful as well. Thank you.
If you look at the charts that we gave, you see the proportions for this year, and that was related to U.S. dollars. In U.S. dollar, we have gone very fast, very high, and therefore you have seen across the industry a fair bit of both volume and mix impact. That's a normal phenomenon. To the extent that the rate curves in Europe are less fast than you would be at a different point there. We also have our very strong P&C business, which is a different type of business in terms of like having all of the cash flow accounts of our clients.
In terms of retention, I talked about all of the assets we staying in our platform and also, so this is the sweeps and the accounts that are going into other products. It's exactly what you said in terms of going into deposit products that are priced attractively. For that, we got 60% retention and then another 25% in our own money market funds. Then the rest is gonna be things like, for example, Treasury, which has also been interesting in the U.S.
I think the core message here is that it's been a particularly strong quarter as to how we have dealt with this, the sensitivity of clients around rates and how they're looking at it. We have been really able to manage this, keep the money within the UBS business alliance, so to say, right? Between what we would do within the bank in terms of deposits, or as invested assets in treasuries or money markets, and then the money market specifically on the asset management side. I think the team did a fabulous job keeping it in the house with an approach to ensure to maximize profitability around it as well.
Given the fact that we have all of these options and that we are so close to our clients, that's why we can do this. A job really well done.
It's been good for your retention, but what does it imply in terms of margin mix shift?
We're not sharing that type of information at this point.
Okay, thank you.
The next question is from Andrew Lim from Société Générale. Please go ahead.
Hi. Morning. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one, just point of clarification on the NII for 2023. You gave that prior guidance of 4Q annualized with a bit of upside. Is that on a static balance sheet basis, or is that actual guidance which takes into account deposit outflows and mix shifts and so forth? Secondly, on your buybacks, you've guided to CHF 5.5 billion for the full year. That marks a bit of a slowdown on the quarterly run rate for buybacks, despite your CET1 ratio inching higher this quarter. I'm just wondering why maybe you're slowing that down a bit.
Looking towards 2023, you're still sitting on a lot of excess capital. I'm wondering whether you would consider having a payout ratio of above 100%, to try and bring that down a bit. Thank you.
On the guidance that we have given, all of the guidance that we have given, both the fourth quarter guidance as well as the indication, directional for 2023, all of that was guidance. It was not on a static balance sheet. In terms of the buybacks, it's simply what happens at that time of the year in terms of the liquidity in the market and also, obviously it's based on the level of our stock price. Our stock price went up, it might be more. The guidance we have given is based on our current stock price and the liquidity expected. Remember that December is gonna have a lower liquidity than other months.
In terms of 2023, we expect to have material share repurchase, but we are not going to be more specific about the levels.
That's great. Thank you.
The next question is from Benjamin Goy from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Yes, hi. Morning. Two questions, please. The first one also on interest rate sensitivity, given the Swiss rates are now the major driver. I was wondering about the deposit beta you're assuming in the CHF 700 million that you stated in the sensitivity guidance. In particular, thinking about that deposit beta was better in the U.S. and your Swiss deposits are still growing. Then secondly, thank you for slide 26 on the, I think 12% of your clients' cash is invested in client asset investment cash and another 5% in money market products. Yeah, just wondering how this looks like, let's say, early in the year, and what would need to change it or are there any major changes expected from here? Thank you.
On the interest rate sensitivity and the beta that you can expect in Europe. The first thing to say is that betas typically become higher as you go up the curve. In the U.S., we are towards a higher point in the curve, and we went there extraordinarily quickly. What is expected in Switzerland and in the rest of Europe is something that is much more measured and therefore we are at a lower point in that curve. That should be combined also with the fact that it is always a weighted average of our products. We do have in Swiss francs also the retail bank that has lower beta products.
In terms of, like, the composition, we thought it would be helpful, so thanks for appreciating it as you try to think about the impacts of the different markets on our invested assets, both in GWM and in AM. Yeah, I think that those are things that don't evolve particularly quickly. I think it's a good place for you to start.
Understood. Thank you.
The next question is from Jon Peace from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thank you. Sorry to have one more on rate sensitivity, but just looking for still a little bit of help in sizing the 2023 benefits. You do offer the guidance that 100 basis points higher rates will add CHF 0.7 billion on the franc curve and EUR 0.2 billion on the euro curve. Do you think those could be substantially offset by deposit beta and mix effects? Because I see consensus as basically about a CHF 200 million uplift on the Q4 run rate, and we might come to a higher number, if we use that sensitivity. Then, second question on the buyback for next year. Appreciate that, you probably won't give us a number until the full year.
Just could you help us understand the process you'll go through in Q4 in sizing that buyback? Is it a backward looking look at how far your CET1 is above your management target, and you pay that out? Or is it a desire to maintain a higher buffer, and then it's based on a forward look on earnings with, you know, payouts of perhaps 100%? Thanks.
Thank you, Jon. Hey, on NII, let's not go into further details. The guidance is the guidance, right? That's why we give it, and that's where we want to keep it as well. On your questions around the 2023 buyback, you know, we go through this every year, looking at, you know, what is the starting capital position going into the year, what are our expectations as to making sure that we have a balance sheet to get through more challenging times, what kind of growth do we expect in the business, and on the back of that, how can we then manage our capital? In the end, we manage our capital to around 13% CET1.
That's the way you can think about it, and whether we can kind of generate if we generate more capital and use less for our growth, clearly that will lead to a higher payout or buyback. Those are the components that we would look at. Now, the point is we have a highly capital generative model. We have a low capital intensive model to generate our income, and we have a buffer to the 13% that we want to manage to.
Thank you.
Maybe before we close, I can just answer a question that came earlier, which was the nine-month year-on-year revenue ex FX, the number is +2%.
Okay. Thank you. In absence of any further questions, I'd like to thank you all for being here this early morning. As indicated, you know, given the market backdrop, I think we delivered a good quarter, both in terms of staying close to our clients and the flows that are coming through, both in the wealth manager as well as the asset manager with CHF 18 billion of net new money coming through. On the asset manager, you see that both on the institutional side as well as the wealth side, we do provide for the right products and services and advisory to our clients in these well, challenging circumstances where client do need guidance.
On the other side, it shows the flexibility of our investment bank in terms of the allocation of resources to move quickly from a market that is more micro related to a market that is more macro driven, and being able to profit from that as well with an increase in our FRC revenues of 64%. P&C doing well over time. A very stable business, growing both on the lending side as well as on the deposit side. Also there, you know, very much client focused and client driven business. On the back of that, delivering CHF 1.7 billion of net profit. Thank you very much, and see you next quarter.
Ladies and gentlemen, the webcast and Q&A session for analysts and investors is over. You may now disconnect your lines. We will now take a short break and continue with media Q&A session at 9:45 A.M. UK, 10:45 A.M. Central European Time. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, please hold the line. The media Q&A will start at 10:45 A.M. Central European Time. Media representatives wishing to ask a question may now press star then one. Thank you.