Good morning. My name is Eric, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Corus Entertainment Q4 2024 and Year-End Analyst and Investor Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press the pound key. Thank you. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I'll now turn the call over to John Gossling, Co-CEO and CFO of Corus Entertainment. Mr. Gossling, you may begin your conference.
Thanks very much, Eric. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Corus's fiscal 2024 fourth quarter and year-end earnings call. With me today is Co-Chief Executive Officer, Troy Reeb. Now, before I read the cautionary statement, I would like to remind everyone that we have slides to accompany today's call, and you will find them on our website at www.corusent.com under the Investor Relations-Events and Presentation section. Now, let's move to the standard cautionary statement found on slide two. We note that forward-looking statements may be made during this call. Actual results could differ materially from forecasts, projections, and conclusions in these statements. We would like to remind those on the call today, in addition to disclosing results in accordance with IFRS, Corus also provides supplementary non-IFRS or non-GAAP measures as a method of evaluating the company's performance and to provide a better understanding of how management views the company's performance.
Today, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP measures in our remarks. Additional information on these non-GAAP measures and the company's financial results and factors and assumptions relating to forward-looking information can be found in the fourth quarter and year-end report to shareholders and the 2023 annual report, which is filed on SEDAR+ or in the Investor Relations-Financial Reports section of our website. Start on slide three. This past year, our industry experienced an accelerated pace of change, with disruptions in the production and distribution of scripted content due to the U.S. writers and actor strikes, impacting audience behavior and advertising markets. We also saw greater competition for programming rights and the introduction of ad tiers on most streaming services, resulting in an oversupply of digital advertising inventory.
We have risen to the challenge, executing our plan to capture efficiencies and reduce costs to create a sustainable future for Corus. We continue to focus on what matters: growing assets that have ongoing potential to drive attractive returns, retaining the talented teams that support them, and delivering engaging content to our audiences, which drives results for our advertisers. In fiscal 2024, our consolidated revenues were just under CAD 1.3 billion. We achieved a 21% reduction in direct cost of sales, a 7% reduction in employee costs, and a 15% reduction in other general and administrative costs for the year. We have more cost reductions in sight for fiscal 2025, but we expect this will be offset by increased costs tied to the return of scripted programming this year versus the U.S. strike impacted period in fiscal 2024.
Discontinuation of certain legacy programming, closure of three AM radio stations, and specialty television network OWN are examples of some difficult but necessary decisions we have made to lower our costs. We met the fiscal 2024 headcount savings targets mentioned last quarter, and we continue with similar cost reduction initiatives in fiscal 2025, given the ongoing headwinds faced by the industry. Total consolidated segment profit was CAD 283 million for the year. We delivered a free cash flow of CAD 114 million in fiscal 2024, and that's an increase of 7% over the prior year, reflecting the positive impact of our lower cost structure and ongoing careful management of our cash.
We reduced bank debt by CAD 39 million this year, which was more than offset by the lower segment profit, resulting in net debt to segment profit of 3.84 times at August 31st, 2024, and that's up from 3.62 times at the end of 2023. This morning, we announced an amendment to our bank credit facilities effective October 24th, 2024, which provides us relief on certain covenants as we continue to pursue right-sizing initiatives and further reduce costs. We continue to have access to our revolving credit facility for working capital needs, with excess cash used to repay outstanding balances. This represents an important step in our comprehensive plan, building on the prudent measures we are taking to strengthen our balance sheet and manage liabilities. At this point, I'll turn it over to Troy to provide an operational update.
Thank you, John. Thank you, Eric, and good morning, everyone. I will start on slide four. Since we last connected with you, our teams have been moving at record pace, making smart investments in programming and marketing to support the upcoming launch of our two all-new lifestyle networks, adding more unscripted programming to our Slice brand, and preparing for the launch of our incredible fall schedule. Our team has acquired some of the most sought-after titles in television, and we could not be happier with their performance so far. Our new and returning shows have premiered over the last couple of weeks. Season to date, we are thrilled to say that Global's core primetime ratings are up 16% over last fall in the most important demo of Adults 25-54.
This is by far the biggest gain of any Canadian conventional network and demonstrates that television audiences remain robust even in the face of more competition. Further, the majority of Global's fall schedule premiered just last week, with preliminary data indicating that core primetime audiences were the highest we've seen on Global since early fall 2022, and a 44% increase over our spring 2024 average, following the return of scripted content to our schedule. While still early in the season, Global has seen great momentum with returning hits like 9-1-1, Survivor, Saturday Night Live, and the popular new show, Matlock, all landing in the top 10 so far... Our top 20 performance is even more impressive on specialty, where Corus networks account for an astounding 90% of the top 20 specialty entertainment programs in Canadian English television. Over to slide 5.
Our long-standing expertise in understanding our Canadian audiences and delivering premium lifestyle content is evident in the bold reimagining of our specialty television portfolio. We are building fresher, younger skewing networks with distinctively Canadian brands that will showcase the best in-home and culinary content to our loyal and expanding fan bases across the country. In September, we announced two new lifestyle brands, Flavour Network and Home Network, and the reception to them and their programming lineups has been overwhelmingly positive. The networks will launch on December 30th of this year with over 460 hours of premium original content premiering, it'll be premiering every night of the week and with even more exclusive content than ever before.
Our homegrown Canadian shows have always been the biggest driver of success across our lifestyle networks, and we've commissioned over 110 hours of original Canadian programming to premiere in 2025, 2026. Our beloved Canadian stars will remain an integral part of these new networks. The launch of Flavour Network will feature the premiere of Pamela's Cooking With Love, with Pamela Anderson, plus new seasons of Great Chocolate Showdown, Carnival Eats, and mega hit Top Chef Canada. Home Network will see new seasons of Renovation Resort, Scott's Vacation House Rules, and Pamela's Garden of Eden, plus new adventure, Building Baeumler from Brian and Sarah Baeumler, and new shows specifically geared to Millennial and Gen Z audiences, Rentovation and Beer Budget Reno. Moving to slide six. The success we are seeing with Slice is proof of Corus's expertise in lifestyle and women's television.
Unbowed by the discontinuation of certain programming rights, our team embarked on a bold reimagining for Slice, pushing deeper into unscripted programming while remaining true to the DNA of our irreverent, all Canadian lifestyle and women's targeted brand. So far, the channel is exceeding all of our expectations, delivering a 5% increase in audience and joining the top 20 specialty networks in Canada. The Daily Show has been a great addition to the network and is Slice's top-rated new program, even outranking some of the other late-night talk shows on conventional television. And just as with our new lifestyle brands, more of the programs on the new Slice schedule are exclusive to Corus in Canada. This means they will help to not just drive audiences on linear television, but the acquisition of more subscribers to our StackTV streaming service. Over to slide seven.
We know what matters to our advertisers, being alongside great exclusive content that drives audiences and engaging with a partner who takes a client-centric approach and provides audience insights they won't get anywhere else. With fall programming back on the schedule, coming a bit later this year and many of our season premieres not until mid-October, we have not yet seen the advertising revenues return at the level we would like. We are certainly seeing an uptick on Global and are monitoring the environment closely and adjusting our strategy accordingly. Similar to trends in the U.S., the growth of ad-supported digital video platforms has led to an oversupply of inventory, exerting pressure on digital advertising demand, as advertisers now have more ways to reach consumers in the streaming and digital space. This creates challenges for our sales teams, yes, but also opportunities.
For the fall season to date, monthly hours tuned to our ad-supported digital offerings is up 24%. We also saw modest growth in StackTV subscribers over the summer, reaching a new record high for StackTV subscribers early this fall. Rest assured, we have a plan for fighting back against the continued encroachment of U.S. tech giants into the Canadian advertising market. It is to focus on what matters, the value of our content, of our communities, and of our people. We continue to work with many content and distribution partners, including across the border, and no one in the market has the proven track record that Corus does for connecting and integrating brands with quality content, and we continue to hear from advertisers. This is why they keep coming back to Corus.
Although we are not yet seeing the recovery we want in the ad market, we are very encouraged by the return in audiences and our share growth on Global. At the same time as we have effectively been reducing costs across the organization. This has positioned us well with a more efficient underlying structure and more available inventory, both on linear and digital, while we carefully monitor preliminary trends signaling return of advertiser confidence and demand. We are also encouraged to have heard the chair of the CRTC confirm this week plans to move forward with an important review of the structural relationships between broadcasters, distributors, and streamers. This is long overdue. There is already ample evidence of the power imbalance between broadcasters like Corus and the foreign platforms that dominate streaming, as well as certain distributors who have increasingly favored their own services to the detriment of Canadian consumers.
We look forward to a speedy conclusion from the CRTC and clear support for the ongoing role of independent Canadian broadcasters and programming in the larger media ecosystem. We would also note that on July 23rd, the CRTC launched a consultation on the future structure of the Independent Local News Fund, including eligibility and allocation criteria. We hope to hear very soon on both our eligibility and the amount of this funding that would be due to Corus, as we remain an outlier, eligible for, but without access to local expression funding. Now, to turn things back to John.
Great. Thanks, Troy. I'm on slide eight. Fourth quarter and year results, and indeed, our outlook for the first quarter reflect the continuation of trends we've been seeing in the advertising market. TV advertising revenue results were relatively in line with our fourth quarter outlook that we gave last quarter, and this combined with lower subscription revenue, the expected decline in content revenue and the sale of Toon Boom in Q4 last year contributed to consolidated revenue of CAD 269 million for the quarter. That was a 21% decrease from the prior year. We delivered CAD 1.271 billion in consolidated revenue for the year, and that was a decrease of 16% from the prior year.
Consolidated segment profit was CAD 42 million for the quarter and CAD 283 million for the year, reflecting the revenue decline, partially offset by the benefits of our cost reduction initiative. For the fourth quarter, these included a 25% decline in the amortization of TV programming rights, and that exceeded our outlook for Q4, as well as an 11% reduction in general and administrative expenses, which was in line with expectations. Combined, these helped to drive total expenses lower by CAD 66 million or 22% in the quarter. On a pro forma basis, which removes the impact of the disposition of Toon Boom in Q4 last year, segment profit was virtually flat in the quarter compared to the prior year.
The last time we saw this result was in Q1 of fiscal 2022, following the return of scripted content to our fall schedule after a pandemic-related programming hiatus. Consolidated segment profit margins were 16% for the quarter, and that's up from 14% last year, while segment profit margins for the full year remained consistent to the prior year at 22%. We delivered free cash flow of CAD 39 million in Q4 and CAD 114 million for the year, an increase of 24% and 7% respectively from the prior year periods. In the fourth quarter, this reflects the benefit of cost reduction initiatives and a higher contribution to working capital, partially offset by lower segment profit and higher restructuring costs.
At the end of our fourth quarter, we are in compliance with all covenants and had CAD 82 million of cash and cash equivalents and CAD 30 million available to be drawn under our revolving credit facility. Pro forma net debt to segment profit, which reflects disposition of Toon Boom in Q4 of last year, decreased to 3.84 times at the end of the fourth quarter, compared to 3.91 times at the end of last quarter, and increased from 3.62 times at the end of last year. Looking ahead to the first quarter of fiscal 2025, we are seeing ongoing disruptions of advertising markets as well as the oversupply of digital advertising inventory as Troy mentioned. The majority of our fall schedule on Global launched just last week, and we are encouraged by preliminary viewing data.
Compared to last year, television advertising revenue for Q1 of fiscal 2025 is expected to decline in a similar range to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 . Amortization of TV programming rights is expected to increase by mid-single-digit % compared to last year, and that's due to the return of scripted programming to our fall schedule on Global. In addition, we anticipate another decline in consolidated general and administrative expenses in the range of 5%-10% compared to last year, and that's a result of the implementation of cost reduction initiatives over the last year and ongoing. Our continuing work to further offset the lower expected revenue will be balanced with delivering on our longer-term strategic objectives, including the launch of our two new lifestyle channel brands at the end of the calendar year, as Troy has taken you through.
All right, let's turn to TV results now for the fourth quarter and the full year, and that is on slide nine. Overall, TV segment revenue was CAD 248 million for the quarter and CAD 1.177 billion for the year, and that was down 21% and 16% respectively from last year. This was mainly driven by lower TV advertising revenue, which declined 16% in the quarter and 15% for the year. Subscriber revenue was lower by 7% in Q4 and 6% for the year. But when we normalize for retroactive adjustments following certain distribution renewals in Q4 last year, subscriber revenue for the quarter was down 3% versus prior year and 4% for the full year.
Distribution production and other revenue was lower for the quarter and year, and that was driven by fewer episode deliveries, reduced service work, and of course, the Toon Boom distribution, sorry, disposition last year. The reduction in Canadian programming expenditures to normalize levels for the year was the main contributor to lower production levels and deliveries. Compared to the prior year, expenses for the quarter were down 23% for the quarter and 17% for the year. In TV, direct cost of sales was substantially lower by 31% for the quarter and 21% for the year. In Q4, the lower costs were driven by a 25% decrease in the amortization of program rights, and that includes lower amortization on Canadian titles, the impact of canceled programming, such as Entertainment Tonight Canada and The Zone, and prior year U.S. program cancellations.
For the year, amortization of program rights decreased by 20%. The amortization of film investments decreased by CAD 13 million for the quarter and CAD 21 million for the year, as our investments in new programming were reduced. TV employee costs were down CAD 4 million or 7% for the quarter, and CAD 19 million or 8% for the year, as a direct result of headcount reduction initiative. Other G&A expenses were down CAD 7 million for the quarter and CAD 25 million for the year, and again, as a result of cost efficiency measures for the year, which included the elimination of Part II CRTC fees. Overall, TV segment profit declined 8% in the fourth quarter, 13% for the year, and that reflects the lower revenue, partially offset by the benefit of the cost savings.
TV segment profit margins improved to 18% in Q4 and 25% for the year, compared to 16% and 24% in the prior year. Pro forma for the disposal of Toon Boom, TV segment profit was essentially flat, with margins increasing from 16% to 18%. Similar to the consolidated segment profit, the last time we saw this virtually flat segment profit of the TV segment was in Q1 of fiscal 2022. All right, let's turn to our radio results briefly on slide 10. Radio results reflect lower advertising demand, with growth in the automotive category more than offset by declines in professional services, retail, telecom, and entertainment.
Radio segment revenue of CAD 21 million for the quarter and CAD 94 million for the year decreased 13% and 9% from the prior comparable period due to lower advertising demand and soft ratings in certain markets, which we are working to address. Radio segment profit decreased to CAD 1.4 million in the quarter and CAD 9.4 million for the year, with cost containment measures more than offset by lower advertising demand. Radio segment profit margin was 7% in Q4 and 10% for the year, and that compares to 12% and 13%, respectively, last year. All right, over to slide eleven, and as I mentioned off the top, we continue to work on our comprehensive plan to strengthen our balance sheet and manage our liabilities.
In addition to securing an amended and restated credit agreement that facilitates our aggressive pursuit of rightsizing initiatives and other cost reductions, we have once again delivered positive free cash flow for the year and continue to diligently reduce our debt. Our significant acceleration of cost reduction activity is evident in these results and remains a top priority given ongoing low forward visibility on evolving advertising trends. We have intensified our focus on the elements of our core business that contribute attractive margins and will remain part of our future, while making the difficult but necessary decisions to discontinue less sustainable parts of our business. Our plan remains to emerge as a smaller but more profitable business with a sustainable future.
As a reminder, our debt is comprised mainly of a term credit facility of CAD 313 million, along with senior unsecured notes of CAD 5 million due in 2028 and CAD 250 million due in 2030. We also have access to the revolving credit facility for working capital purposes. All right, finally, over to slide 12. In addition to the excellent progress on cost reduction and our balance sheet, we have strengthened our networks portfolio with the announced upcoming launch of Flavour Network and Home Network and the addition of new unscripted programming on Slice. These are excellent examples of compelling near-term opportunities that build on Corus's success, not only in linear television, but also in digital and streaming. We remain committed to ongoing cost reduction initiatives, while continuing to grow our most valuable assets.
Having secured an amendment to our financial covenants and access to liquidity, we will also be very focused on our efforts to right-size the balance sheet and liability structure. I'll conclude by saying that our teams have shown not only incredible resilience, but an unmatched ability to perform and deliver, even under extremely challenging conditions. Corus continues to deliver content and drives audiences and results, and to provide Canadians with access to high-quality news and information every single day. Troy and I will now take your questions. Over to you, Eric.
At this time, I would like to remind everyone, in order to ask a question, press Star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Adam Shine with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.
Thanks a lot. Good morning. John, can you just give us an update on the headcount reduction? I think the goal was at Q3, minus 800. I think at your last quarter, you were at minus 500.
Yep. Yeah, thanks, Adam. We're essentially there. The mix is a little bit different than we had expected, but from a dollar savings perspective, we are definitely hitting that target, which, of course, we're very focused on through the summer.
Okay. And just in terms of any early discussions with advertisers, let alone carriage providers, any quick preliminary comments in terms of how Home and Flavour are destined to be received?
We were very oversubscribed for our launch event, Adam. The atrium here at Corus Quay was packed, and we actually had to turn some folks away. The feedback was very positive, I think particularly around the accessibility and continuation of all of our Canadian talent and Canadian shows, which really are the big drivers for advertisers. We had a number of, I obviously won't speak to individual cases, but we did have a number of advertisers commit to being launch partners with us, for the launch of those brands. We have no concerns about our ability to get high sell-out rates on those channels in the new year.
Obviously, an easy comp, given the Hollywood strikes of last year, which truly delayed the start of the fall season. As Troy, you alluded to, the fall season really didn't fully begin in September. It's more sort of halfway through your quarter. Are you seeing any early signs, you know, a week after most of your schedule hit, that, you know, some advertising is indeed coming back and there's a slight improvement to trend, you know, perhaps in the back half of the quarter, rather than how the first part of the quarter started?
Always hard to gauge. I mean, you're right that the... We're getting a lot more of our inventory coming because a lot more of the ratings are coming a little bit later in the quarter. I think that alone should lead to a bit more buoyancy in the back half of the quarter. And look, the preliminary indications are ratings is we're going to take some share. So your basic share-based national advertising should see some positive shift in our way.
Whether the overall market is going to have much lift in it, I think is an ongoing question, because there, you know, yes, we'll take some more in the linear TV environment, from our linear competitors, but there remains a, a glut of digital inventory that's going to take a while to work its way through the system.
Yeah, and I think-
Absolutely.
Adam, I mean, within the outlook that we gave, just to sort of build on Troy's last point there, so as you, I think, are alluding to or would expect, the conventional pacing is actually pretty good, so really what we're seeing is that pressure from digital and that oversupply of digital inventory is really hurting specialty at this point, so I know we don't break out commercial, specialty, and digital, but when we look at all the moving pieces, conventional is performing quite well, you know, not just given the ratings, that's obviously great, and that helps us going forward, but just generally, and again, as you mentioned, because of the strikes, that's what we would expect, but specialty is feeling the pressure, and that's, we think, coming mainly from all this digital inventory in the market.
Thanks a lot, John.
Yep.
If there is one encouraging sign we're seeing, is that pricing is starting to firm up a little bit. That, you know, kind of the discounting demand that has been very prevalent in the market for a while, seems to be abating.
Okay, just one last one for you, John. You know, obviously there's a lot of blocking and tackling going on. Are there additional asset sales that, you know, are being explored and perhaps, you know, destined to be achieved over the course of, let's say, the next six-ish months as we reflect on your new credit facility and how the covenant may or may not evolve post-March?
Yeah, I think so. I mean, we've been on this for a while, and I know we've talked about it on past calls. There are definitely some, I'd say, less material assets that could potentially generate some proceeds for us, and of course, those would be used to repay term loans. So, you know, nothing that is in the zip code of Toon Boom, but certainly, you know, we're looking under every rock to see if there are things that might generate some cash proceeds.
Okay, thanks a lot. I'll leave it there.
Thanks.
The next question comes from the line of Vince Valentini with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks very much. A couple of questions. First off, working capital, John, pretty big inflow of cash in the fourth quarter. Anything unusual there in terms of your receivables or stretching out payables? And should we expect that to sort of swing back in Q1 and Q2, or was that more permanent savings?
No, it's, it's probably returning back to more normal levels, Vince. I'd say Q4 was mostly about the money coming in, not so much about the money going out. So yeah, I mean, look, we've done a good job getting our DSOs down in the receivables portfolio. And frankly, as the revenue shrinks, so too does the working capital on the balance sheet. So you know, some of it's just a tailwind, unfortunately, of reduced revenue. So I think, yeah, in Q1, you're going to see it swing back the other way. We've got, you know, we've got a much the largest advertising quarter, and we've got a lot of programming costs obviously coming back at us as well. So it's not a permanent thing.
It's going to start to follow, we think, the regular seasonality of, you know, Q1 and Q3, we'll build working capital, and then Q2 and Q4, we'll release it.
Thank you. Second, on debt, you're... I'll be honest, I haven't had time to dig through the balance sheet to follow the chain, but I think I saw in the release that it said you paid down, like, CAD 2 million dollars of debt in the fourth quarter, and if that's the case, what happened to the rest of, you know, even if you-- after you back out leases, I mean, the free cash flow was materially higher than CAD 2 million dollars.
Yep. It's all in cash. We've got CAD 82 million of cash at the end of the year.
Oh, so you're not just paying down the term loan as soon as you get the money or you're holding the cash?
No. The repayment you saw was the standard amortization of the term loan, and beyond that, we're in cash.
Okay. And third, I mean, obviously, people have seen the newspaper stories on potential acquirers for the business and any interest they might have. Can you give any sense of how management and the board deal with this situation at this point? Is it just no interest in any discussion until you've sort of figured out what you're doing with your balance sheet, or are you open to alternatives at this point? If there's anything you can help us understand how the process might play out, it would be helpful.
Yeah, look, I think the most important step to date has been what we announced this morning on getting the credit amendment and getting that base through, you know, the end of the first calendar quarter next year to then move to the next step. So beyond that, you know, it's all speculation. I think what we're expecting is there will be lots more news flow, lots more rumors, and we're not going to comment on any of them because, of course, you know, as you can imagine, there's probably certain things that aren't even remotely true in what you're reading. So I think we're just gonna choose to not comment.
But, you know, I think it's fair to say, of course, the board is very pleased with the issue and the leverage and the situation with the balance sheet, and that's what we're dealing with.
Thank you.
Sure.
From the line of Aravinda Galappatthige with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.
Morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So, John, I just wanted to maybe kind of go back to your Q1 advertising guidance. So something similar to Q4, which is sort of 16% decline.
Yeah.
Obviously, Q4, Q1 is, you know, would still have the original Discovery channels. I don't know if you're kind of factoring in some degradation in that, you know, on the path to sort of that December thirty-first deadline. How should we, like, when we kind of think about approaching forecasting for the rest of the year, is there any more visibility you have? Obviously, you've launched the new channels, the other ones come off. Anything that you can help us with in terms of that shape, would be helpful.
Yeah, sure. So Aravinda, on Q1, within you know those additional comments I gave to Adam. I would say, you know, despite what I said about specialty feeling more pressure, more downward pressure, the you know the existing networks that are being rebranded are certainly performing very well. So, you know, it's more a case of some of the smaller networks than those core networks. Beyond. Look, I mean, not just because of you know the current situation in the advertising market, but we're pretty careful not to go beyond the next quarter just because it's very difficult to read. And, you know, what's going to happen beyond Q1 is still very much you know out there in terms of our ability to call it.
So, you know, if you look at last year, Q2 was a little better, I think, than people expected, and then Q3, Q4, and now Q1 are looking kind of similar. So, it's just difficult to call it either way.
Aravinda, I would just add that with respect to those particular services, we are seeing very strong advertising demand for the new brands and anticipation that they will deliver with quite robust schedules of lots of original content. So we're not not really concerned around you know revenue degradation on those channels, even in the event that we saw some ratings erosion, which we're not anticipating, you know, significant ratings erosion. But even in the event that we saw that, there's enough inventory space that we'll still be able to accommodate all the advertiser demand. So from a revenue standpoint, I don't anticipate there's a big shift to happen.
Okay, thank you. Then, with respect to the cost, obviously, you kind of provided a sense of, you know, we would go back to some inflation on the programming cost, but as you pointed out in your earlier answer, you know, you got there in terms of headcount reduction. You're seeing employee costs and G&A, in particular, fall double digits. How should... Do you feel that's enough to sort of offset the programming amount? You know, is it fair to think about perhaps low single-digit declines in the cost of sales for, or sorry, OpEx for television?
I think that's a good way to look at it. I mean, the programming number could go where you just tried to go on the top line. The programming number for the full year is still a little bit hard to call, just given with that delay of the particular CBS's prime time. You know, how that plays for the rest of the year and into the back half is a little bit difficult to know right now. But certainly, you know, we've been talking about this, I think, for at least six months now, that you know, we fully expected, and it... I wouldn't call it inflation necessarily, Aravinda, although, yes, the number is going up. There's definitely a lot more deliveries in this fiscal premium programming.
So that's, that's going to be a factor for sure, especially in Q1 and Q2. But yeah, we're going to drive the G&A, you know, as hard as we can to try to offset that. And then, you know, the question becomes what you asked. Your first question was: What's, you know, what's the advertising revenue going to be? And that's what, that's what we're watching, obviously, very carefully. So, you know, I think you've hit the main moving pieces here, and we'll continue to do what we can do on the cost side, and then, you know, but as well, we'll do whatever we can, obviously, on the top line.
Yeah, and if I can, maybe I can say, look, there's a couple of ways to build a program schedule. The one thing, you know, whether people call it peak television or... There's a heck of a lot of program supply out there around the world right now. And, you know, we still have the benefit of being large aggregators of content with big brands that are able to carry great programming to audiences in Canada. And you can build schedules a couple of ways. You can go take the, kind of, what some may see as the easier path and buy an output from a studio and put it on a service here, and sometimes that's a more expensive path.
Or you can do like we've now done with Slice, and you build a schedule from scratch from a whole bunch of different suppliers. It's actually a less expensive schedule than the one we used to have, and it's performing better. So, you know, we'll continue to look for opportunities to, to go at the programming costs at the same time as employee and G&A costs as well. There is ongoing inflationary pressure in the programming market, but, but it's a core area of focus for us on, on that side of the ledger, too.
The other thing, too, Aravinda, that comes to mind is, you know, when we're talking about employee costs, salaries and benefits and other things that track there, there's obviously a large portion of that runs through our G&A. But as well, there's also, you know, some that goes through the studios and then ends up on the balance sheet as a film investment. And when you look at our cash flow statement, and this sort of goes back to Vince's question, really, you know, the amount of cash that we committed to film investments in the quarter was also for the year down quite a bit. So, you know, that's another place where the headcount reductions will benefit us, is the amount of cash we're spending on programming.
In fact, it, you know, it was a source of cash in the fourth quarter, the film investment line. So, you know, I think that, you know, there's basically two places where those cash savings track. And we'll, perhaps, next quarter, come back and do a little bit better tracking to sort of show where those savings are.
Just one more from me. With respect to the covenants, I just wanted to make sure there's no sort of definition changes as far as those covenants are concerned for the 5.75 and the 7.25. It's still the same net debt to EBITDA definition?
It's not net debt, it's gross debt.
... Oh, yeah, of course. Okay.
Yeah. Yeah, no, no change there.
But the numerator is the same, right? The cash flow definition is unchanged.
It's essentially proportionate EBITDA. It's not exact-
Okay.
Exactly the way it's defined, but it's basically EBITDA less minority, and then, yes-
Yep.
Gross debt.
Thank you very much. I'll pass the line.
Thanks.
As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press Star followed by the one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of David McFadden with Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.
Okay, thanks. A couple of questions. So, I guess you're not really sure exactly where the TV program amortization is gonna come out for the year. But, what do you expect for the actual cash spend for the year relative to fiscal 2024?
Dave, that's basically the same question, because the variability that I mentioned on the last question is in really the global schedule, and that's essentially the amortization and the cash are the same, just because of the way the way that works. So, you know, it's. All I can say is that the relationship between the amortization and the cash will likely be similar to somewhat better for the year. But, you know, it's going to be higher, obviously, because we are we're taking more deliveries, especially in the first half. So, you know that. I know there's a structural sort of, you know, difference where the cash is higher than the amortization. I think that gap, to the extent that's what you're looking at, is going to get compressed this year.
It should go back to a more normal level. I mean, typically it's been under CAD 50 million, in some years been closer to 25, so I think we're going to be more in that range.
Okay. I should say that the lack of any lack of clarity on, you know, what the final program amortization is isn't new to this year. It's a common case every year. It's just a question of, does a show get canceled? How many episodes does it deliver on? That kind of thing. And those things vary depending on audience tastes and where the studios are at.
Okay. So the other question is, you know, when those brands transition over to Rogers, and the new channels start, do you have an idea on how much EBITDA you're going to lose? Because the increase in the debt covenant, you know, goes up quite a bit. So it seems to imply that you're going to lose a fair bit of EBITDA. I don't know if you could comment on that.
No, I mean, we haven't, other than pointing people to the historical information, we haven't. And certainly we don't ever suggest that we're going to lose all the EBITDA on those channels. I think that, you know, Troy's commentary around, you know, how the demand for those channels and the and how they've been received, I think that's good. In terms of the cost of programming, as you know, we can build schedules at a lower cost than what we sometimes pay on output deals. So, you know, and then there's the whole distribution side of the channel. So yeah, we haven't gone there in terms of really guiding on that. But look, I think again, the pressure that we're seeing is more on the smaller channels than it is on some of those, you know, sort of marquee channels.
All right. Okay. All right, thanks.
Thanks.
I would only say on that one, there's probably two dots getting connected there that don't need to be. Yeah.
The next question comes from the line of Drew McReynolds with RBC. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks very much. Good morning. Maybe just on regulatory, for you, Troy, like, obviously a big focus here, lots of questions on, you know, exactly what comes Corus' way, and there seems to be a whole portfolio of things, whether it's the Streaming Act, News Act, Broadcasting Act, now new review. Can you just remind us at a high level, kind of where, what Corus has kind of received to date? And, you know, as you look forward in the next two to three years, like, what kind of falls within that timeframe or maybe next year, in terms of, you know, getting actual tangible regulatory relief?
So, well, first, a reminder that we did receive. We had an interim relief application that we had filed with the CRTC a year ago. And we did receive preliminary indications on that we would be able to shift our dollars that we were being mandated to put into the PNI category, which is generally a big money loser, into other genres of Canadian programming, where the returns are better and the audience demand is better. And that alone has been helpful to us. I think the most significant file you're talking about is our inclusion in the Independent Local News Fund.
We have certainly taken the position that we are eligible for local expression funding, as is every other operator of a conventional broadcaster that provides news in Canada. Every other local station that provides news in Canada receives local expression funding, whether through a vertical integration, a crossover from their distribution side, such as Bell and Rogers and Videotron, or through the ILNF, when you're talking about the small independents. You know, our status changed over a year ago, and we have yet to receive any funding, and we've taken the position that we are eligible for it. The CRTC began a consultation with the acknowledgment that we are eligible for it, and we're waiting to see what support may be granted out of that process.
We are just hoping that it will speed up.
Okay. That's it for me. Thank you.
Thanks, Drew.
Next question, and Maher Yaghi, please go ahead.
A little bit of a drop out there, operator.
I know, Maher.
Okay, great. That's me. Thank you for taking my call.
Hi, Maher.
So I wanted to ask you guys, thanks for all the, you know, the information you guys provided on advertising revenues that we, you know, you, you're hoping to achieve. But on the subscription side, how can... You know, could you help us understand where, you know, we could be landing here in Q1, but specifically in Q2, as you make that transition? Any assumptions or any guidance you could provide, that would be very helpful. And on the transition, so you guys are switching on December thirtieth, as I understand. Have you-- why not switch before?
Like, I'm just trying to understand the technicalities, because why not do the transition before, and so that you can potentially block any BDU from switching customers due to technicalities on the name of the channel? I'm just trying to understand why wait until December thirtieth-
Yeah
... just to make the switch.
Yeah, so first off, there's a bit to unpack there, so I'll start with the carriage agreements themselves. Generally, I mean, every carriage agreement is a snowflake, so they're all special, but generally, carriage agreements are not for the brand on the channel, they are for, they're for the license, and in this case, we expect all of our carriage agreements to continue. We expect our channel placement to continue, and that our new brands will continue in the exact same place as our old brands, or our current brands.
So that's why, you know, we, you know, we don't think there's going to be a significant change in the viewer experience on December thirty-first, as there was on December thirtieth, because people will wake up, put on that channel the next morning and find Home is now on the air in the place where HGTV Canada used to be. We are certainly using... Now, to the question of, you know, could we have switched the brands over earlier? Certainly, we could have. We are in a deal and paying for and have the rights to those trademarks until the end of this year. Our intention is to fulfill our commitments with that agreement with Warner Bros. Discovery to utilize those trademarks in Canada.
And we're also, you know, using those services to inform the viewers that new services are coming. So if you watch Food Network Canada today, you will see promotional spots talking about Flavour Network, you know, ready to be unveiled to Canadians. So there's no better marketing than to be able to speak to 100% of the people who you're targeting, so we're utilizing that.
And Maher, on your question on sort of the trends on subscriber, it's been a bit noisy for the last several quarters, just in terms of, you know, sort of one-time impacts, whether, you know, because of the prior year or, you know, some carriage changes that we had that are now reversing. So I say, look, if you track back through our commentary the last several quarters, I think the normalized kind of line, you know, on subscriber revenue has been somewhere minus 3%-4%. And that's obviously a mix of cord cutting, cord shaving, and then digital filling in. And as Troy said, you know, STACKTV continues to do pretty well. So I think, you know, it's hard to predict the future.
There's a lot of things going on, but I think, you know, that trend is probably the good baseline to really think of.
Maybe I'll just close just where we began. You know, if someone else is planning to launch a linear HGTV or Food Network in the market, it's up to them to go out and find new channel positions and new dial positions and negotiate new carriage agreements. We have our carriage agreements in place and our expectations that those our channels will continue in the same spot. Same way when we rebranded Action to Adult Swim, you know, the consumers woke up the next day and found the channel was branded Adult Swim.
Okay. Okay, great. Thank you for that. And, you know, now just talking about your debt situation and the covenants, you know, it's nice to see that you have these, you know, the next two quarters, with the improved, or easier covenants. Can we think about, you know, what will happen after March? What is, what is it that you guys are trying to achieve, let's say, over the next two quarters, to give enough visibility to your creditors to extend, or, you know, keep maybe, you know, and, you know, make the covenants a little bit easier for you to continue on beyond March, or, you think that the leverage ratios will by then decline enough for you to, come into the requirements?
Yeah, Maher, I think it's, at this point, it's a bit unknown just in terms of what will happen between now and the end of March. So that's what we move on to now that we have the, you know, the relief on the bank and some breathing room there to move to the next steps. But in terms of what that's going to look like, I don't think we can speculate at this point.
Maybe I'll ask it another way, John. So what is, what is it that you're trying to achieve from now until then in terms of your cost structure so that you can make the business sustainable long term?
Look, I think the cost structure is obviously important and, you know, we're faced with a headwind on programming, obviously, after the strike. You know, there's continued work we'll do on G&A. But as I said earlier, you know, if the revenue continues on the path it's on, then it's going to be very difficult. So, you know, I again, it's hard to say exactly where this all goes, but, you know, the current shape of the balance sheet is likely not gonna be sustainable, I think is probably the most we can say.
Right. What are the potential options in order to reconfigure the balance sheet that you're looking at? Can you maybe help us understand maybe some of the options in front of you?
No, I don't think we can speculate there. I mean, other than to say, you know, everything's gonna have to be on the table in terms of how that's gonna look.
Okay, fair enough. Thank you.
Thanks, Maher .
We'll now turn the call back over to Troy Reeb for closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. I don't really have any closing remarks other than to thank everyone for their ongoing interest and support through what has been a challenging year, and also to acknowledge for all of our teams across the country here at Corus, many of whom listened into this call. It has been a year of incredible change, incredible work, and some great results under some trying circumstances. A thank you to all of our teams here at the company across the country, and best of luck to everyone. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.