Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the First Quantum Minerals Limited Third Quarter 2023 Results Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star, then zero. I would now like to turn the conference over to Bonita To. Please go ahead. With opening remarks, followed by Rudi Badenhorst, our Chief Operating Officer, who will provide an overview of our operations. Ryan MacWilliam, our Chief Financial Officer, will review our financial results, and Tristan will wrap things up, after which we will open up the line to take questions.
With that, I will now turn the call over to Tristan.
Thank you everybody for joining us on our conference call today to discuss our third quarter results. I'm speaking to you today from our center on Enterprise operations here in Zambia. I'm pleased that production at our three largest operations continued to improve in the third quarter, which Rudi will provide more detail in his review of operations. As well, we saw a modest easing with some of our input costs. As a result of our focus on productivity and costs, our third quarter EBITDA of $969 million was a meaningful improvement from the second quarter, despite the continued weakness in the copper price.
Before continuing with details on our third quarter results, it is pleasing to share with you that the concession contract surrounding the Cobre Panamá mine was enacted into law at the end of last week, which marked the final step in revising the legal, legal framework for the mine. The new law received strong support at the National Assembly, with 47 votes in favor of the new agreement out of a total of the 55 votes that were registered. I would like to thank the team in Panamá for their hard work and collaboration with the government of Panamá to ensure the successful passage of the contract into law.
With the law published in the Official Gazette, First Quantum will soon be making payments to cover taxes and royalties for 2022 and the year to date in 2023, which Ryan will provide more details on in his financial review. With the legal certainty at Cobre Panamá now established, we look forward to continuing our contribution to the economic benefits of the country through employment, supplying from local businesses, and all our other programs in country. Nevertheless, we have seen protests from various groups across the country, which acts as a reminder that we, as a mining company and the industry as a whole, need to do more hard work in communicating the many benefits that our mines can bring to the surrounding communities and our host countries. And with that, I would like to hand the call over to Rudi.
It was pleasing to see improvements continue from the second quarter, with each of the three main operations having production increases in the third quarter. Total copper production was nearly 222,000 tons during the period, up over 34,000 tons quarter-over-quarter, as grades and throughput improved at each of Cobre Panamá, Kansanshi, and Sentinel. Copper C1 cash costs in the third quarter improved considerably at all three of the operations. Group-wide C1 costs averaged $1.42 per pound during the third quarter, a $0.56 per pound improvement over the second quarter, which was primarily driven by the higher production volumes. Although there was an easing in some input costs, which Ryan will speak to in his remarks.
At Cobre Panamá, the operation delivered a record copper production of 113,000 tons, 25% higher than the second quarter, as grades improved and mill throughput was higher with the continued successful ramp-up of the CP100 expansion project. Throughput was over 24 million tons during the quarter, and we remain on track to exit 2023 at a consistent and reliable annualized rate of 100 million tons through the plant. There is currently a drought in Panama, which is impacting water levels in the Panama Canal and has led to some vessel restrictions. At this time, the Cobre Panamá operations are not impacted by the canal, with most of the mine's supplies sourced from South America and delivered through our own port.
With regards to concentrate shipments, the only impact on Cobre Panamá are slightly longer voyage times for concentrate shipments to customers based in Asia that have not chosen alternative shipping routes. Moving over to Zambia. At Kansanshi, copper production of approximately 40,000 tons was nearly 5,000 tons higher than in the second quarter. Production during the third quarter continued to focus on mining cutbacks at elevated benches with higher grades, and this is expected to continue into the fourth quarter. At Sentinel, grades continued to improve in the third quarter, allowing for copper production to improve by nearly 10,000 tons to 64,000 tons in Q3. The improved copper production was driven predominantly by higher grades, while throughput was challenged by hard ore found in the lower levels of stage one and two pits.
This harder ore impacting mining, crushing, and milling rates during the quarter, and is expected to continue into the fourth quarter. As such, along with the challenges experienced earlier in the year at Sentinel, 2023 production guidance has been lowered for the operation, which Tristan will address in his closing remarks. Thank you, and I will now hand the call over to Ryan to review the financials.
Thank you, Rudi. The copper price was broadly flat quarter-on-quarter, averaging $3.79 per pound in Q3, 1% lower than in Q2. However, copper prices fell towards the end of the quarter to just over $3.60 per pound, as expectations of higher for longer interest rates, with a knock-on impact on industrial activity and rising geopolitical tensions, have led to a risk-off market sentiment. Despite this, copper demand, particularly in China, remains robust on the back of continued electric grid and electric vehicle spending. A reminder that the lifeblood of energy transition will flow through copper veins. As Rudi described, production was very strong through the quarter and resulted in a 23% increase in copper sales to 219,000 tons, which is a record for First Quantum.
This meant that despite the flat copper price, revenues increased by 23% to $2 billion. As Rudi also noted, there's a drought in Panama that has led to longer voyage times through the canal for some of our shipments. Based on the structure of these contracts, however, the company's revenue recognition and timing of cash receipts on these shipments is not impacted by these delays. The record quarterly copper production also benefited unit costs, helping drive Copper C1 cash costs down 28% to $1.42 per pound. Cash costs also benefited from higher byproduct credits, as well as lower consumable costs, as fuel, sulfur, and explosive prices all reduced compared to the previous quarter.
It's worth noting that Brent crude oil prices increased from $75 per barrel at the beginning of the quarter to $92 per barrel at the end, driven by OPEC cuts and tension in the Middle East. This has the potential to impact costs towards the end of the year, once existing fuel inventories are worked through. On labor costs, it was pleasing to see the Cobre Panamá collective bargaining contract successfully signed in September. This agreement will be in force for the next four years, providing more certainty in our labor spend. More broadly on costs, we have narrowed our C1 guidance for the year to $1.75-$1.85 per pound. This mostly affects a weaker copper production at Sentinel in H1, offset by the strong production in Q3 across the other sites and the expected strong end to 2023.
Slide 17 highlights that third quarter EBITDA increased 71% to $969 million, the highest in the last year. The significant increase was as a result of the record quarterly sales and lower costs. Net earnings attributable to shareholders increased to $325 million, and adjusted earnings per share increased to $0.52. The effective tax rate has averaged 17% year to date, with full-year guidance between 40% and 45%. The effective tax rate in the final quarter will be higher, as income tax expense for 2023 is adjusted under the refreshed concession contract at Cobre Panamá. As noted in our MD&A, it is intended that the charge relating to the taxes and royalties up to the year-end in 2022 will be excluded from 2023 adjusted earnings.
So the full year guidance rate of 40% to 45% reflects 2023 tax and royalty payments only. I would also note that the anticipated top-up under the new structure in Panama is treated as a royalty and not a tax in the calculation of effective tax rates. Moving on to our balance sheet. Net debt reduced slightly by $13 million- $5.64 billion this quarter. Despite strong EBITDA growth, net debt was impacted by unfavorable changes in working capital, the successful completion of the La Granja acquisition and the resulting $105 million payment to Rio Tinto, and an increase in CapEx spend of $49 million. The increase in CapEx reflects the steady progress in the S3 Expansion project at Kansanshi, which Tristan will describe later. Lastly, on capital allocation.
Current copper prices are well below the level needed to incentivize greenfield developments, particularly when one considers the high CapEx and OpEx inflation in recent years. For context, in real terms, this week's opening copper price of $3.54 per pound is equivalent to a price of around $2.90 per pound in 2018. Our capital allocation focus therefore remains on strengthening the balance sheet and less capital-intensive brownfield projects like S3, rather than allocating any material capital to our portfolio of greenfield projects. Additionally, with CP100 commissioned in Q1 and Enterprise now producing nickel concentrate, the brownfield expenditure on two of our three key projects is behind us.... with the production growth to come at Cobre Panamá and Enterprise ramp-up.
Current liquidity remains strong at $2.3 billion, supported by the issuance of the $1.3 billion eight-year bonds in the previous quarter. This positions us well to cover the Cobre Panamá taxes and royalties, which are payable soon as a result of finalizing the legal framework in Panama. Total payments for the year will be comprised of taxes and royalties for up to the year-end in 2022 of $395 million, of which $45 million is already paid, and approximately another $215 million will be payable soon to cover the first three quarters of 2023, resulting in a near-term payment of $565 million.
For 2023 as a whole, based on current copper prices, we expect a total payment of $375 million for the year. That includes a top-up payment. This will result in a total tax and royalties payable for 2022 and 2023 in Panama of $770 million. That brings the finance section to an end. I'll now hand the call back to Tristan.
Thanks for that, Ryan. As Rudi noted, the third quarter saw production improvements. However, regrettably, we are lowering our copper production forecast for 2023 to 745,000-775,000 tons, mainly due to Sentinel. At Cobre Panamá, the CP100 expansion project continues to ramp up very well. The operation continues to achieve periods of design capacity and remains on track to exit the year at a consistent rate of 100 million tons per annum. As such, we have tightened our copper production guidance for Cobre Panamá to between 365,000-375,000 tons of copper. Construction of the moly plant continues to progress well, and commercial production of that unit is expected in 2024.
At Kansanshi, mining will continue to focus on the upper benches of Main 15 and Main 17, and we expect the strong grades to continue in the fourth quarter. Kansanshi continues to perform within our expectations, albeit at the bottom end of the range. As such, our copper production guidance range has been tightened to between 130,000-140,000 tons. Gold production has been lowered to between 65,000-70,000 ounces to reflect gold grades encountered to date. Current levels of copper and gold production will remain at or near these levels until the S3 Expansion project comes online. The S3 Expansion continues to progress well. We have started receiving long-lead items during this past quarter, including the first ultra-class trucks and initial components of the mills and primary crusher.
Earthworks and construction works continue and are expected to accelerate into next year. We remain on schedule for first production from the S3 Expansion in the second half of 2025. At Sentinel, given the challenges early in the year and the harder-than-expected ore counted in the third quarter, we have lowered copper production guidance to between 220,000-230,000 tons. However, work is being done to bring in softer ore, with mining starting in stage three, which should start to meaningfully contribute to ore feed in the second quarter of next year. As well, over the last several months, a lot of work has been conducted to better prepare the mine for the upcoming rainy season, including mining down the saddle zone between stage one and two and adding additional pumping capacity.
We continue to review the impact of harder ore on the coming year mine plan, but at this stage, we expect to be able to blend more effectively with the wet season infrastructure being installed. We will address guidance in January, but at this stage, we are holding to our previous outlook for 2024 and 2025. At Enterprise, another important milestone was achieved during the quarter, with the first sale of nickel concentrate. The focus remains on stripping of waste and the final ramp-up of the process plant to full production capacity, which is expected next year. We encountered challenging metallurgical characteristics of the shallow ore due to weathering, leading to a reduction in our 2023 guidance to between 3,000-5,000 tons of contained nickel.
However, a good understanding of the process impact of this material has been developed, and we expect plant recovery and concentrate quality to continuously improve as we gain greater exposure to less weathered ore deeper in the mine. Lastly, it was with great sadness that we announced the passing of our chairman, Philip Pascall, during the quarter. I am in Zambia right now, where Philip was posthumously honored for his work and contributions to the country with the Eagle of Zambia Award by President Hichilema yesterday. Philip was a great man and an inspirational leader, and this loss has been felt deeply across the company and the communities that First Quantum operates within. The outreach from the investment and mining community has been tremendous and humbling. I would like to sincerely thank everybody for their condolences and their sharing of memories of Philip.
Built on the legacy of the founders of the company, we remain committed to the trajectory of First Quantum, and we believe we have both the projects and the capability and people to deliver that into the future in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, and in a financially disciplined approach, cognizant of the constraints of needing to continue to improve our balance sheet. With that, I will be happy to take questions now. Thank you.
We will now begin the analyst question and answer session. Analysts are permitted to ask one question and one follow-up, and are welcome to rejoin the queue if they have more.
To join the question queue, you may press Star, then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handsets before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press Star, then two. The first question comes from Jackie Przybylowski with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much. And, just to echo what you said at the end of your remarks, Tristan, and, pass on my condolences to you and the team, on the passing of, Philip. It's a huge loss to First Quantum, of course, and the whole industry. My question is on your guidance revisions, both on the volumes and the costs. It seems like, Q3 was a strong quarter across your operations, and, my understanding, based on prior comments from yourselves, was that Q4 is expected to be fairly strong as well. So I'm wondering if that's changed, if your expectations for Q4 have changed, or if you're just, reflecting some more of a cautious outlook, just given what we know from the first half of the year?
Yes. Thanks, Jackie, and I'll ask Ryan to provide some more detail. But, yeah, we have tightened the guidance, and as you say, that's built off, particularly at Cobre Panamá, very strong performance in the quarter, and we're very pleased with the progress on the CP100 expansion in terms of the impact that it's having. What we do see is, the grades were higher at CP100 during the quarter, and they will come off a little bit in the fourth quarter, just in the normal course of the mine plan for the year. And so it's not really conservatism there, but just focus on the existing mine plan.
At Sentinel, look, we're in a good position to face the wet season, and perhaps I can just ask Rudi to comment a little bit more on that. Rudi, would you just cover that in terms of outlook for the remaining quarter at Sentinel and perhaps also at Kansanshi? And then, Ryan, if you could just comment on the cash cost outlook. Thank you.
Yes, thanks, Tristan. Hi, Jackie. Thanks for that question. Look at Sentinel experienced a difficult first half of 2023 as a result of the impact on the rainy season, as we discussed on the last call. But we've made a lot of infrastructure investment on dewatering capability and capacity at Sentinel, effectively tripling its input dewatering capacity to over 10,000 cubic meters per hour. We've finalized the final environmental treatment pond construction activity during this latter part of Q3. We've also finalized pumping water back to the plant and using it primarily in the plant, rather than neutralizing and discharging to the environment under the regulatory limits.
So effectively, meaning that we do not have to hold back and wait for water to be neutralized at Sentinel before we can discharge, because all of that's now going into the plant. Secondly, at Sentinel as well, you know, the saddle that between stage one and stage two, that in the previous wet season resulted in the damming of water, has been completely mined out. And, you know, as far as the hard ore is concerned, yes, certainly we experienced some very hard ore in the bottom of stage one and stage two, but during the quarter, we're mining in an area of the ore block called domain four, which has hard kyanite.
And although that will remain with us during the course of the fourth quarter in both of stages, one and two, we are already noticing drilling and blasting, punching through that domain into the one below, which hosting slightly, softer, softer ores. So we are, you know, and where we are currently situated in stage one, but in the hard stuff, it will migrate out of that towards Q1, Q2 of next year, but certainly will be with us for the remainder of this year.
Then, Jackie, maybe if I just jump in on costs. So we still expect to finish within our initial cost guidance. All we've done is we've moved up our bottom end from 165 to 175, and that's largely a function of what Rudi described, the weak production from Sentinel for most of this year, which is somewhat offset by slightly better cost inputs, most notably diesel and explosives, than what we assumed at the beginning of this year. So we now have a new cost guidance, $1.75-$1.85 per pound of copper.
That's super helpful. Thanks, Ryan and Rudi and Tristan. And if I could ask a follow-up, maybe to Ryan. You've got a number of cash outflows coming up with the tax settlement as part of this agreement with the government of Panama and the La Granja acquisition completion and the work you're doing on S3 and other projects. Can you talk a little bit about your balance sheet and where you see your balance sheet sort of going over the next couple of quarters with those cash outflows? And so how you expect to fund those, if it's through just cash on hand or any other way of funding them? Thank you.
Sure, Jackie.
Go ahead, Ryan.
So we saw leverage metrics improve through the quarter. We were at 2.2 times net debt to EBITDA at the end of Q2. Because of the strong EBITDA performance, we're now at just above two times net debt to EBITDA. So pleasing to see that progress off the back of stronger EBITDA. And that was also in a quarter where we made the $105 million payment to Rio Tinto for Granja. So that payment is now behind us. In terms of what is ahead, as you note, we've got the payment associated with the settlement and agreement, a new legal framework in Panama. That will be paid shortly, and we're in a fortunate position where we have $2.3 billion of liquidity, strong liquidity on the balance sheet to address that.
And then going into next year, you know, it'll be as before, continue to remain disciplined about capital. Certainly not looking at spending material capital on greenfield projects and being disciplined around the capital that goes into our, our brownfield projects, which are being re-appraised.
That's super helpful. Congratulations again on a really great quarter. Thank you.
The next question comes from Orest Wowkodaw at Scotiabank. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning, and my condolences as well. No doubt, Philip, a legend of the mining industry. Just following up on Jackie's questions. If I'm hearing you correctly, I think you said that you expect a harder ore at Sentinel to spill over into the first half of 2024. Has that already been factored into the existing guidance for Sentinel for next year of 245,000-265,000 tons? Or are you finding the ores harder than what's assumed in the current mine plan in that guidance?
Sure, Orest. You-- so I'm here at Sentinel now and just looking at what that harder material was, and look, it chemically altered rather than, you know, anything you can see delineated or otherwise. So it's an area that we really saw as we approached it in terms of, you know, drilling performance, the grade control drilling and then the production drilling. So it really did affect us in Q3. We are starting to get through it, very much a horizontal band that runs through, and as I said, it's sort of chemical alteration, so very hard to pick up other than, you know, in a physical parameter. But we believe that-- so it is present in the pit, in that horizontal band.
We threw some of it in areas in the bottom of stage one, but we do see it continue. And as Rudi said, we will see that continue to Q4. It was part of the mine plan before, but we did see that during the course of the year, we were gonna be across different areas of the pit that would have provided flexibility. The wet weather in Q1 hampered that flexibility, and we were very much more sequential as the year turned out. That is, we mined stage two, and we went to stage one. And I think next year, with the additional water infrastructure in place, we'll see much more of a blended, mixed mine plan across the year. And that's why we say, we are where we're at in terms of guidance for next year.
We will address that in the, we're going through the budgets right now at the moment to address it in January, but at this stage, no reason to preempt that.
Okay. And thank you for that. And just as a follow-up question for Ryan, I didn't quite catch some of the numbers that you disclosed with respect to the upcoming payments here in Q4. Can you just give us that total again for the total payments, I think, in Panama, relating to both 2022 and, I guess, what would that be? The first three quarters of 2023.
Sure, Orest. So we'll be paying $395 million, which is for all payments up until the end of 2022. In addition to that, we'll be paying a large portion of our 2023 taxes and royalties, effectively a catch-up for this year. And that combined number is at $565 million. We do expect across 2022 and 2023 to pay total tax and royalties of $770 million, but obviously some of that, those payments will occur in, in 2024.
Okay. So that 770 includes a Q4 number in it?
Correct.
Okay. All right. Thanks so much.
The next question comes from Greg Barnes with TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you. Tristan, with Law 406 now in place, there are a number of Supreme Court rulings and government actions that relate to Law 9, one of them being that Law 9 was unconstitutional. Do all those fall away now, and they become really non-issues for you?
Yeah. Hi, Greg, thanks. Look, so certainly, we're very pleased to have the contract passed into law. You know, the process has alleviated a lot of the concern around that. You know, it received really good support through the National Assembly as 47 votes out of the 55 that were cast, and I guess that level of support speaks to the authority of the passing of the contract. The unconstitutionality motions, Panama is a litigious environment, and so there is ongoing unconstitutionality proceedings.
We're not a party to those proceedings, so we don't have the detail, the specific nature, but it is common practice, as I said, in Panama and other mining jurisdictions for the challenges like this to be filed. We, because of the passing and the status, the involvement and the deliberation that was involved in establishing now the new legal framework to go forward, it went through public, due public process. It went through the National Assembly. We followed the, you know, our understanding is the due legal process has been adhered to, and the government of Panama has certainly assured us of the same . Once the details emerge, you know, from those proceedings, we will be able to take part in the proceedings.
But you know, we do see this as just a normal course of action in litigious environments, but we have confidence in the standing of this process that's taken this long to get to this point. And again, we're pleased to have it passed into law.
Okay, that's great. Thanks. Thanks, Tristan. Just a second question, and maybe a bit out of left field, but with respect to Ravensthorpe, it continues to lose money. The nickel price is weak, and the outlook isn't great. And I just noted in the MD&A that it appears that there was a cash call and POSCO didn't participate. Is there any thought about the future operational viability of Ravensthorpe from here?
Yes, thanks, Greg. Look, Q3 at Ravensthorpe, we were impacted by ongoing maintenance. It's a feature of the salt water that we take there, and but also adaptation of the plant to the material characteristics of Shoemaker Levy. So, you know, for example, magnesium content and so on, and the density around what comes in from Shoemaker Levy. So that adaptation is ongoing. I think it will continue to impact us in Q4. We have a major shut on the acid plant coming up. We need to renew the catalyst there, and that shut will improve significantly the electrical side and the acid plant performance and efficiency.
Really, the ongoing focus for us at Ravensthorpe is to get to the 30,000 ton per annum plant design capacity, and that really does start to deliver a lot in terms of maintenance improvement. What we've put in place those adaptations to the front-end beneficiation that deal with density and deal with beneficiation from Shoemaker Levy, and also on the back end, on reject handling and so on. But Ryan, you might comment on POSCO's decision around the cash input.
Sure. So I would note, firstly, on the market side, the nickel price has struggled through Q3, and on top of that, payables for products like MHP remain low, a function of just the sheer amount of volume of nickel that is coming out of Indonesia. So I think for us and everyone in the nickel, that is exposure to the nickel sector at the moment; we are spending a lot of time on what we can do to enhance operating margins, and that's some of the activities that Tristan talked about. It's only a pertinent question, Greg. In terms of POSCO specifically, they had certainly invested in Ravensthorpe to procure MHP for a nickel sulfate plant, which they were looking to build. At this stage, they've delayed that plant, given the volumes that are coming out of Indonesia.
So there's less incentive for them to fund Ravensthorpe going forward, given what the strategic rationale for their initial investment was.
Okay. Thanks, Ryan. That's helpful.
The next question comes from Ralph Profiti with Eight Capital. Please go ahead.
Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. Tristan, at Sentinel, when you look into Q4 and into 2024, you've addressed sort of the water issues and the tail events on potential water inflows, so I thank you for that. Can you maybe expand on that and talk a little bit about energy and grid availability, as it pertains to some of the changes you're making in the combination circuit with that finer grind? And also, how is the mine shaping up for things like maintenance, given the increased wear with this harder ore?
Thanks, Ralph. Rudi, do you want to answer that question, and I'll come in at the end, if needed?
Thanks, Tristan. Hi, Ralph. Look, with every wet season when it approaches in Zambia, the question of electricity comes up. Certainly, we have, as per our previous experience, there's no desire whatsoever to limit security of supply to our operations, and certainly, we've had a good rainy season last year. We've also just in the process of finalizing our long-term power supply agreements with the electricity provider, and that effectively has been agreed for both Sentinel and Kansanshi, and just get drafting final documents there. So as far as electricity supply is concerned, I think there's no concern on our part, and certainly as a company, we are also looking at joint ventures with others, like Total, for example, looking at the installation of renewable energies in Zambia.
So I think long term, we're fine there. The harder ore has just been explained, I said earlier as well, you know, is mainly situated in domain four, with hard Kyanite. There's a band that runs through the pit, and so been giving us trouble with throughput on the crushers and the mills during the last quarter, and it looks like we're punching through that in the main pit now, although it will linger in stage two.
B ut also the availability of the third cutback, stage three, and then towards the west, that we are now actively in, in mining, that will deliver ore through the end of Q1 into Q2 next year, makes the blending characteristics so much better. So we've had a bit more abrasion in our crushers during this last quarter, but we don't expect to see that for long. And at the moment, this very minute, we are also busy with a mine-to-mill study, utilizing the expertise of a vendor to help us with some of those material selections.
Got you. Thanks, Rudi. That's helpful. Ryan, when do the 2024 tax installments come due, right? Just thinking a little bit forward, are those front-end loaded towards the year? And going forward, how will tax installments payments be made? Just thinking about timing.
Yes, so in general, we make the royalty payments on a quarterly basis, and then the top-up generally comes in the first part of it the next year. You're now gonna see us move to a fairly normal approach in terms of timing of taxes and royalties, Rob.
Gotcha. Thanks, team.
The next question comes from Bryce Adams with CIBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Tristan and team, thanks for the call, and, well done on the operational results. I have another question on Panama and the new mine contract. It's not into law, but it sounds like there's still quite a lot of protesting and opposition in the country. Do you think it's a risk that a presidential candidate picks up on this and uses it as part of their campaign election, and that a new government in May next year might want to revisit that contract? Quite a few ifs in there, but in terms of risk management, is that a scenario that you've thought through and planned for?
Yeah. Hi, Bryce. Thanks for the question. Look, again, we're pleased to have the contract passed into law, and that was, you know, the outcome in terms of the vote in the National Assembly, you know, after due democratic process, which included that it was returned to the committee, and then, between the company and government, we addressed the queries that came back from the committee and back from the democratic process, which were related to sovereignty, and then that went forward into the National Assembly. And again, it was very strongly supported, 47 votes in the final, the final reading of the 55 that were submitted. So it's been thoroughly reviewed by the National Assembly. It's been through the public process, the public participation.
Look, the protests we acknowledge, and as we certainly, it highlights the need for us and the industry as a whole to continue to improve disclosure, improve our communication, improve our engagement, and discussions of the benefits of mining around economy, employment, our community impact, the positive social contribution, our environmental standing. We note the president's comments, his message to the nation yesterday on the topic, and we certainly support his comments on the impact around the new framework and the new renewed and strengthened benefits that flow to Panama and the environmental and social standing of the contract. In terms of the election, yes, you know, that will be in May next year, and the new president will come in place in July.
We, you know, given the process to date, we believe things are in a strong legal standing, and the risk is low, but we have confidence in the legal process to date, and given the exhaustive process that has been put in place.
Okay, thanks. I appreciate the discussion. That's it for me.
Thanks, Bryce.
The next question comes from Ioannis Masvoulas with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Yes, thanks very much for the presentation, and, my condolences as well. My first question is around, the gold production outlook, at both, Kansanshi, which is on a better footing now, and Cobre, with the CP100 progressing well. Do you have better line of sight on the midterm gold production guidance? Is there any potential upside or downside versus the published technical reports on either asset?
Rudi, would you like to take the question on gold guidance, please?
Thanks, Tristan.
Thank you, Ioannis. So we're currently going through our budgetary and three-year planning process, and obviously, we'll update on guidance in January. Gold grades, especially at Kansanshi, you know, is really related or relate the challenges to the gold grades at Kansanshi, seen with the overall decline in copper grades. There's been historically quite a good correlation between the decline in copper grade and the gold grade following suit. So copper and gold production going forward should be pretty similar to 2023 levels until we see the S3 expansion of Kansanshi kick in.
Okay, great. Very clear. And then the second question on the balance sheet. Despite the very strong cost performance in the quarter, you still haven't managed to bring down a net debt. Part of it, of course, is the La Granja deal and the outflow, but bigger part is also the working capital investment in the quarter.
Could you provide a bit of color on what happened there? And would we, should we expect a release in Q4 that would temper the tax payments at Cobre? Thank you.
Ryan or Ioannis, do you want to take that?
Sure, Tristan. So Ioannis, what you saw at the end of Q2, was receivables were unusually low for us, and they've now moved to a more normalized level. So I wouldn't expect future working capital releases. I'd now treat it as that we're at normalized working capital levels, and generally, that's just driven by the timing of shipments of copper concentrates, whether they fall before or after the end of the quarter.
Great. Thanks very much.
The next question comes from Alex Terentiew with Stifel. Please go ahead.
Hi, everybody. Most of my questions have been asked, but I wanted to just ask one more here on Cobre Panamá. It had a very strong quarter, you know, in, in Q3. You know, kind of looked like it was firing on all cylinders here. I know you're ramping up to 100 million tons a year, but, you know, the quarter already had 98 on an annualized basis. Is there... You know, what's the bottleneck here in this mine? Is there opportunities to get it, a- above 100? Are you gonna be going into some harder ore that's gonna slow things down? I'm just trying to see, you know, what the opportunities are for, for your, you know, largest, kind of, lowest cost mine to, to deliver to the upside in future years.
Yeah. Thanks, Alex. Look, again, we're in the process of updating our budgets, and we'll come back in January on guidance for the coming years. But in a general comment on the CP100, yeah, we're very pleased with the progress. It's certainly delivering, and again, we have a lot of confidence in being able to achieve a consistent run rate of 100 million by the end of the year. Look, I think we will see, you know, higher maintenance as the higher throughput continues on. As I said, we also had higher grades this quarter, and next quarter is in the normal course of the mine plan, we do expect slightly lower grades, still within the original setting.
We did tighten guidance for the year. But look, the overall bottleneck at Cobre Panamá, once we resolve the comminution circuits, the front-end screening, the pebble crushing and secondary crushing, and then also, as we put in place the improved process water supply, the bottleneck comes to the SAG mills. The SAG mill is the biggest capital item of the process plant. If you decide to put in a new SAG mill, you need everything downstream on that, and so what you're talking about is a new process plant. We're not at that stage yet, where we're considering, you know, a second processing plant at Cobre Panamá. We want to see this run continue and deliver the 100 million expansion.
You know, that decision is not in front of us at the moment. It's there, there's optionality around that in the future, in terms of copper price and balance sheet position, and so on. But really, Alex, that's where you get to the bottleneck. Next is at the big SAG mills, and those are the big capital cost item, if you want to grow beyond that.
Okay, sounds good. Thank you very much.
The next question comes from Edward Goldsmith with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Hi, two questions from my side. Firstly, on Kansanshi, how should we think about the grade profile next year, given the current focus on the higher grade cutbacks? And secondly, on La Granja, can you outline the milestones and timeline to completing the feasibility study? Thank you.
Thanks, Edward. Rudi, do you want to take the first question on Kansanshi, guidance and grades?
Thank you. Look, quarter four throughput certainly will improve, Kansanshi, as we mine back the Mine 15, 16, and 17 cutbacks to the south and removal of waste dump around the main 18 cutback. Those higher upper benches do mine easier, going through mixed and oxide before we get into competent sulfide. So we do mine a little bit easier, and we're expecting to see higher grades there as a result of the stratiform mineralization. However, the continuous, you know, the benefit of that through 2023 will be seen in quarter four. From primary message, I guess, still is, you know, the focus is migrating from a higher grade, low volume operation through to a larger volume, lower grade operation, similar to Sentinel and Cobre Panamá. That's the reason for S3's expansion.
Until such time as we see S3 kick in, we'll be looking at similar sort of production levels.
Edward, in terms of your question on La Granja, look, we, we were very pleased to finalize that transaction with Rio Tinto during the quarter. You know, Rio is a, you know, well-capitalized industry leader, and, and we're very excited about the opportunity posed by La Granja. You know, the opportunity to be a, a major partner in a, a large world-class ore body, in a country that's been very reasonable to build mines and operate over the last 20 years is, is very exciting for us. Obviously, coming from when we're in a financially sound position, that we do that in a disciplined manner.
But look, in terms of your question on development timeline, the initial 2-3 years is really focused on two key areas: the community engagement, number one, and that relates to, you know, Rio had an excellent program there, and in terms of world-class community engagement, and we will continue that on in terms of the project. And the second area is on the feasibility, and really that's around mostly delineating the ore body, not so much in terms of expanding, it's already one of the world's largest undeveloped assets, but more around delineation, and the phasing of development of the project.
So we're currently mobilizing the first two rigs to do the infill drilling to do the metallurgical test work, to look at the geotechnical side, to upgrade the resource, and be able to develop a high-level project layout on La Granja. That will be conducted in-house. The timetable for that over the next two years would then give us put us in a position to be able to put all of the engineering studies and so on in place thereafter and develop the asset we expect over a period of around four years. So you know, something in the order of six years is appropriate for La Granja. So in terms of timetable, we still see Taca Taca is more advanced at this stage. Obviously, that is. There's no sanction to proceed at the current time.
We're certainly awaiting the output of the ESIA permitting process and also the final decision in the election in Argentina, and what the incoming government will do in terms of improving, potentially improving Argentina as a destination for investment. So but, you know, La Granja sits out there. We're very excited by the project, but it will take that time, possibly two years initially, and then six years in total to develop.
Thank you.
The next question comes from Ian Russouw with Barclays, London. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Just one question from me for Ryan. Just on the outstanding VAT balances within the Zambian operations, could you... I see there were some negative adjustments for phasing expected just for the, I guess, future non-current balances. Is that related to, I guess, changes on the cost base, or is it pricing assumptions? Maybe if you can just provide some details on that, please.
Yeah, Ian, that would be a combination of a couple of things. So there's quite a lot in there, but the balance is, it comes out to that slight adjustment.
Okay. But, I mean, presumably that talks to the future expectations of profitability of Kansanshi then being slightly lower?
Yeah. So the way the VAT-
Is that how I should think of it?
Yeah, exactly. So the way the VAT agreement works is we now can deduct off a set percentage of taxes and royalties, each quarter. And obviously, as copper prices move up or down, so that number grows or reduces, depending on what our taxes and royalties are. So that's generally what affects the phasing of that. So the lower the copper price is, the less we're able to offset, and therefore, the longer that VAT becomes due.
Okay, great. And what copper price sort of take? Do you use consensus prices or what do you use within that analysis?
It's broadly consensus, Ian.
Okay, thanks.
This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Tristan Pascall for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Thanks, operator, and thank you, everybody, for joining us today. I certainly look forward to our next update with you early in the new year. Thanks, everyone.
This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.