Good morning, and welcome to the Assured Guaranty Limited First Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Robert Tucker, Senior Managing Director, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining Assured Guaranty for our Q1 2021 financial results conference call. Today's presentation is made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The presentation may contain forward looking statements about our new business and credit outlooks, market conditions, credit spreads, financial ratings, loss reserves, financial results or other items that may affect our future results. These statements are subject to change due to new information or future events. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on them as we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise them except as required by law.
If you're listening to a replay of this call or if you're reading the transcript of the call, please note that our statements made today may have been updated since this call. Please refer to the Investor Information section of our website for our most recent presentations and SEC filings, most current financial filings and for the risk factors. This presentation also includes references to non GAAP financial measures. We present the GAAP financial measures most directly comparable to the non GAAP financial measures referenced in this presentation, along with a reconciliation between such GAAP and non GAAP financial measures in our current financial supplement and equity investor presentation, which are on our website at assuredguaranty.com. Turning to the presentation, our speakers today are Dominic Frederico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Assured Guaranty Limited and Rob Bailenson, our Chief Financial Officer.
After their remarks, we'll open the call to your questions. As the webcast is not enabled for Q and A, please dial into the call if you'd like to ask a question. I will now turn the call over to Dominic.
Thank you, Robert, and welcome to everyone joining today's call. I'm pleased to say that in the Q1 of 2021, we continue to benefit from the value proposition that our financial guaranty provides in challenging times, which was further recognized last year as well. Driven by our highest Q1 new business production in U. S. Public finance since we acquired AGM in 2,009, Assured Guaranty generated $86,000,000 of PVP, 69% above last year's Q1 PVP and more than in all but one first quarter since 2,009.
Key shareholder value measures also reached new highs at quarter end of 79 point $4 for adjusted operating shareholders' equity per share and $116.56 per adjusted book value per share as we continued our successful capital management program. Additionally, adjusted operating income per share of $0.55 was 53% higher than in the Q1 of 2020. The Q1 of this year is the 4th consecutive quarter in which we saw our total net par outstanding increase, demonstrating fundamental organic growth in our core business. This is a positive sign for our effort to restore the size of our insured portfolio and the related predictable base of future earnings embedded in our insured transactions. We generally expect to see an upward trend in our portfolio size as quarterly runoff diminishes and we continue to originate new business.
The U. S. Municipal bond market was very strong in the 1st 3 months of 2021. Par volumes sold in the primary U. S.
Municipal bond market reached its highest Q1 level since the Great Recession, dollars 104,500,000,000 of which industry insured par neared $8,500,000,000 setting a 12 year record for 1st quarter insured volume. Strong demand for bond insurance led to 76% more insured parts sold than in the last year's Q1, significantly outperforming the 19% increase in total municipal issuance. The insurance penetration rate of 8.1% during the Q1 of 2021 was higher than the 2020 full year rate of 7.6% and higher than every Q1 and annual penetration rate since 2,009. Assured Guaranty widened its lead in new issue market share during the Q1. Our 65% share of insured market municipal insured municipal par sold was better than our market share in any quarter since 2014.
The $5,500,000,000 of new issue par sold with our insurance in the quarter was the highest amount we insured in any Q1 since 2010. It was almost 2.5 times our insured par in last year's Q1 and our primary market transaction count of 252 was up 57%. These year over year quarterly comparisons were influenced by the pandemic related market disruption in Q1 of 2020, but in what may be a more meaningful comparison, our Q1 insured par sold was almost 20% higher than in the Q4 of 2020. During this year's Q1, we assured $100,000,000 or more on 8 different transactions with aggregate insured par totaling $2,250,000,000 Large transactions tend to attract institutional investors and our leadership in this category reflects a growing appetite for Assured Guaranteed Insurance in the institutional market. Even as there have been signs of recovering economy and better than expected municipal revenues, the persistence of the global pandemic and what it has taught the market about economic unpredictability have shown that investors have good reason to remain concerned about downgrade risk, trading value stability and liquidity, which our guarantee has the potential to address.
We believe those concerns combined with an appreciation of our overall value proposition were behind our ability in the Q1 to ensure $1,500,000,000 of par on 27 transactions assigned AA underlying ratings by at least 1 of the 2 leading rating agencies. The stable outlooks on Assured Guaranty's own AA ratings provide an extra level of comfort for investors in these high quality bonds. In international infrastructure finance during the Q1, we executed 2 international transactions, neither of which created any new risk exposure. One transaction was an extension of the debt service reserve guarantee that we provided to Welsh Water in 2019 as a substitute for the bank liquidity facilities. The other involved converting a convention center project financing that we insured years ago into a direct obligation of a sub sovereign.
Additionally, we made progress on important new transactions, 2 which have already closed since quarter end generating over $23,000,000 of international PVP in the Q2. While the pandemic delayed a number of projects, it also had the effect of widening credit spreads and therefore creating opportunities for us. We believe the U. K. And other governments' efforts to provide stimulus through infrastructure investment will require a significant amount of private financing to be fully successful and that we will have a part to play in that.
We have a robust pipeline of potential infrastructure opportunities and have been receiving an increased variety of new business inquiries. We also believe investor appetite for our product remains strong in our international markets. We have continued our efforts to maintain and expand our relationships. Our structured finance and international underwriting groups are collaborating on various portfolio guarantee transactions. We believe this is an area we can help institutions optimize the capital associated with their infrastructure portfolios using principles that could be applied to other asset types as well.
Additionally, the Structured Finance Group is currently processing or in discussions for potential transactions in diverse categories, including rail assets, trade receivables, life insurance, CLOs, equipment leases and subscription finance facilities for private equity funds. Importantly, in relation to our financial strength and stability, our disciplined and diversified approach to writing new business, along with our loss mitigation activities, has helped to reduce the below investment grade percentage of our insured portfolio to just 3.2% of net par outstanding. About half of our big exposures to Puerto Rico are blures and there have been considerable positive news out of Puerto Rico. As I mentioned on our last call, we conditionally agreed in February to support a revised GEO and Public Buildings Authority planned support agreement with the Oversight Board and other creditors of the Commonwealth and PBA. We did so with the express understanding that the government parties would work with us to make that agreement part of a more comprehensive solution that also addressed related Puerto Rico credits, including what are known as the clawback credits, such as revenue bonds of the Highway and Transportation Authority and the Convention Center District Authority.
A big step towards such a resolution took place on April 12 when we, the Oversight Board and others agreed in principle to a framework for settling our insured exposures to the HTA and CCDA credits, subject to definitive documentation of an HTA CCDA planned support agreement. We have now finalized that documentation as announced on May 5 and have reaffirmed our support for the GEO PBA PSA. It will still be months until the plan of adjustment incorporating these PSAs and the PREPA RSA are approved and implemented. But with these settlements, we have agreed to terms on over 93% of our Puerto Rico net par exposure. Outside of these agreements, the company has only $241,000,000 of additional Puerto Rico net par exposure, almost all of which relates to credits that have not missed any principal or interest payments.
Lastly, once again, we reassessed the potential impact of COVID-nineteen on our insured portfolio, especially in light of the $1,900,000,000,000 federal stimulus package enacted during the Q1. And that review further indicated that the pandemic has not given us a reason to establish significant new loss reserves, and we do not expect any ultimate losses from first time municipal bond insurance claims that arise specifically from COVID-nineteen. In addition to having a great quarter in the financial guaranty business, we made good progress in the asset management business. The CLO market blossomed during the Q1 with total supply, including new issues, refis, resets and reissues, setting quarterly records of $106,300,000,000 in the United States and €26,000,000,000 in Europe. Assured I'm issued 1 CLO in each of those markets during the period.
We also reset a CLO, which extended its life and therefore its fees and we sold $71,000,000 of CLO equity from our legacy funds. We reduced our total non fee earning CLO AUM to $2,400,000,000 from the $3,600,000,000 3 months earlier while increasing total CLO AUM by almost $500,000,000 to $14,300,000,000 CLO management fees for the quarter were more than double those of last year's Q1. The outlook for this business is positive. We recently opened 3 CLO warehouses and remain focused on raising more third party capital. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome 3 new directors to our Board of Directors, Michelle McCloskey, Lauren Radke and Courtney Shea.
They bring varied backgrounds as leaders in public finance, structured finance and investment management, and their insights and wealth of experience will be of great value to our Board's strategic decision making. Looking towards the rest of the year, we expect strong investor demand for municipal bonds, exemplified by the approximate $30,000,000,000 of inflows that municipal bond mutual funds and ETFs took in during the Q1. We believe high demand for municipal bonds is likely to be met by issuers' needs to raise more capital for infrastructure development in order to amplify the benefit of infrastructure funding likely to come from Washington, as well as by their desire to refinance and borrow, while interest rates remain low. As long term yields rise, long term municipals may become an attractive and safer alternative to corporate bonds, especially for high net worth investors wary of potential tax increases. We believe this mix of market conditions will provide us with many public finance opportunities, large and small.
As finance activities revive around the world, we have already seen a pickup since quarter end in our international financial guaranty business. We expect to complete some large structured finance transactions as the year progresses. We also believe you will see significant growth in our asset management business. We have been through a lot in the last past 14 months. We believe the challenges of this period have made the market even more aware of the resilience of our business model, the dedication and professionalism of our employees and the benefits of our financial guarantees.
As always, we are committed to creating value on behalf of our shareholders as well as for our clients and the investors who place their trust in our credit discipline and financial strength. I will now turn the call over to Rob.
Thank you, Dominic, and good morning to everyone on the call. I would like to start by highlighting our 2 key metrics for new business production, PVP and 3rd party inflows of assets under management. As Dominic mentioned, Q1 U. S. Public finance PVP was our strongest Q1 since 2,009 and was the largest component of our $86,000,000 1st quarter PVP.
Strong PVP results over the last several quarters has helped us maintain our deferred premium revenues, our storehouse or future premium earnings at approximately $3,800,000,000 since the end of 2019. In the Asset Management segment, total third party inflows of $873,000,000 was primarily driven by CLO issuance, which helped to increase our fee earning AUM by 11% in the Q1 of 2021 from 12.9 dollars to $14,400,000,000 In terms of adjusted operating income, we earned $43,000,000 or $0.55 per share in the Q1 of 2021 compared with $33,000,000 or $0.36 per share in the Q1 of 2020. While this represents a 30% increase year over year, I want to highlight that our Q1 2021 results include a one time $13,000,000 after tax write off of an intangible asset attributable to the insurance licenses of MAC or Municipal Assurance Corp. MAC was our U. S.
Muni only insurance subsidiary until we merged it into our larger New York insurance subsidiary, Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp, or AGM, on April 1, 2021. Excluding this write off, Q1 2021 adjusted operating income would have been $56,000,000 representing an increase of 70% over Q1 2020. The restructuring simplifies our capital and organizational structure, eliminates the cost of maintaining an additional legal entity and is expected to increase future statutory net investment income and the regulatory dividend paying capacity of the remaining U. S. Insurance subsidiaries over the next few years.
The Insurance segment's Q1 contribution to adjusted operating income was $79,000,000 compared with $85,000,000 in the Q1 of 2020. Excluding the MAC license write off, adjusted operating income would have been $92,000,000 or an increase of $7,000,000 Within the insurance segment, total income from the investment portfolio increased by $18,000,000 or 24%. The investment portfolio generates net investment income from its fixed maturity portfolio and equity and earnings from investees from alternative investments carried under the equity method. Our fixed maturity and short term investments account for the largest portion of the portfolio, generating net investment income of $73,000,000 in Q1 2021 compared with $83,000,000 in Q1 2020. The decrease in net investment income was primarily due to lower average balances in the externally managed fixed maturity investment portfolio, which declined due to dividends paid by the insurance subsidiaries that were then used for AGL share repurchases, lower short term interest rates and lower income from our loss mitigation securities.
Equity and earnings of investees primarily include assured I'm funds and several other alternative investments managed by 3rd parties. The assured I'm funds, primarily the CLO and asset based funds, generated a gain of $10,000,000 in Q1 2021, compared with a loss of $10,000,000 in the Q1 of 2020. Alternative investments managed by third parties generated gains of $9,000,000 in the Q1 2021. As a reminder, equity earnings in investees is a function of mark to market movements attributable to the assured I'm funds and therefore more volatile than the net investment income on the fixed maturity portfolio and will fluctuate from period to period. As we shift our current fixed maturity long term assets into these alternative investments, the related net investment income may decline.
However, over the long term, we expect the enhanced returns on the alternative investment portfolio to be over 10%, which exceeds the returns on the fixed maturity portfolio. Scheduled net earned premiums were consistent at $107,000,000 year over year as recent new business production substantially offset the decline in earnings on structured finance transactions. 1st quarter 2021 refundings resulted in accelerations of $16,000,000 compared with $15,000,000 in Q1 2020. Loss expense was $30,000,000 in Q1 2021 compared with $18,000,000 in Q1 2020. Q1 2021 includes loss expense on both public finance, particularly Puerto Rico, as well as U.
S. RMBS exposures. 1st quarter 2020 RMBs exposures. 1st quarter 2020 expenses consisted mainly of Puerto Rico loss expenses offset by a benefit on U. S.
RMBs due in large part to increased excess spread. Net economic loss development neteconomiclossdevelopment of $13,000,000 in the Q1 of 2021 primarily consists of $11,000,000 in loss development on U. S. RMBS, which was mainly attributable to lower excess spread offset by benefits due to changes in discount rates and improved performance and recoveries on previously charged off loans in certain second lien transactions. The economic loss the economic development attributable to change in discount rates for all transactions was a benefit of $48,000,000 for Q1 2021.
Our expected losses as of Q1 2021 reflect in our scenarios the terms of the Puerto Rico settlement agreement reached this week, which should also significantly reduce the future volatility of these reserves. These agreements, in addition to our previous PREPA agreement, represent over 93% of our net Puerto Rico par outstanding or 46% of total below investment grade net par outstanding. Turning to the Asset Management segment. Adjusted operating income was a loss of $7,000,000 in Q1 2021 compared with a loss of $9,000,000 in Q1 2020. Our long term view of the Asset Management segment is optimistic.
Since the acquisition of Assured I'm we have made great progress in advancing our strategic goals. We have liquidated assets and wind down funds, increased fee earnings, CLO AUM through the issuance of new CLOs and the sale of CLO equity from legacy funds, raised capital for new opportunity funds and achieved attractive returns on the funds we have established since the acquisition. In Q1 2021, the increase in management fees from CLOs and opportunity and liquid strategies more than offset the decline in fees from our wind down funds as our core strategies pick up momentum after a difficult 2020. The Corporate division mainly consists of interest expense on the U. S.
Holding company's debt as well as Board of Directors and other corporate expenses. Adjusted operating loss for the Corporate division was $29,000,000 in Q1 2021 compared with $39,000,000 in the Q1 of 2020. Q1 2020 included losses related to an investment impairment charge and a loss on the extinguishment of debt. On a consolidated adjusted operating income basis, the effective tax rate may fluctuate from period to period based on the proportion of income in different tax jurisdictions. In Q1 2021, the effective tax rate was 15,000,000 sorry, 15% compared with 24.7% in Q1 2020.
Turning to our capital management strategy. In the Q1 of 2021, we repurchased 2,000,000 shares for $77,000,000 at an average price of 38 point $8.3 per share. Since then, we have continued the program and repurchased an additional 600,000 shares for $28,000,000 Since the beginning of our repurchase program in January of 2013, we returned $3,800,000,000 to shareholders, resulting in 64% reduction in total shares outstanding. The cumulative effect of these repurchases was a benefit of approximately $30 in adjusted operating shareholders' equity and $53 in adjusted book value per share, which helped drive these metrics to new record highs of over $79 in adjusted operating shareholders' equity and over $116 in adjusted book value per share. From a liquidity standpoint, the holding companies currently have cash and investments of approximately $218,000,000 of which $60,000,000 resides in AGL.
These funds are available for liquidity needs or for the use in pursuit of our strategic initiatives to either expand our business or repurchase shares to manage our capital. I'll now turn the call over to the operator to give you the instructions for the Q and A period. Thank you.
We will now begin the question and answer session. The first question comes from Tommy McJoynt with KBW. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning guys. So congrats on the signing of the HCA agreement yesterday. Thank you. Yes. So I wanted to ask about the terms of that HTA agreement has both the upfront cash and bond and then the clawback CBI instrument.
Could you guys share your expectations on what you think the CVI instrument would add to your recovery beyond the 30% upfront in cash and bonds?
Sure. The CVI is kind of like a moving target. So there's 2 assumptions that you've got to make in principle, right? What is it going to be the continued growth in the sales tax amount? And that really is predicated on the economy.
So trying to factor in an economic growth factor and you can pick whatever number you like. And then the second thing you got to look at is the discount rate. As we get closer to the finalization of the agreement, there is also going to be the question whether this instrument will trade. And if it trades, that gives you a little bit better valuation principle. So it's really in our scenarios picking discount rates and growth of the economy as we try to evaluate in our scenario analysis.
Remember, our reserves are still based on GAAP requirements, which says you've got to map out scenarios and then probably weight them. So in our scenario model for HTA, one of the scenarios includes the settlement plus an assumption relative to economic growth and discount rate on the cash flows, but there's also scenarios that obviously change the settlement, make it worse, we can't really make it better. And of course, we changed the discount rates and the growth assumptions to make the reserve model work that you've got more than one scenario in the reserve model. So there's a lot of moving parts there as we get further along in the year. There'll be more clarity relative to the weather the instruments trade.
And of course, at the time we're ready and comfortable, we'll start to disclose more of our assumptions. But at this point in time, we're not doing that.
And was there a follow-up, Mr. Victorioin?
Yes. Thank you. Yes. So now that we have made some good news or good progress on Puerto Rico, what are your latest level of thoughts on or interest in consolidating the rest of the remaining run offloads of business available? And when we think about those opportunities, could you discuss whether you think you'd be able to structure any transactions using capital at the OpCo level rather than at the HoldCo level?
Obviously, there's a lot of capital trapped there at the operating company level. So it could be an efficient use of capital there. Any thoughts on that?
Sure. So let me answer them in the order that you gave us. So number 1, does this open up the door for some more consolidation? And the answer is probably yes. It clears one of the hurdles, but there are still remaining hurdles, right?
Valuation is 1, acceptance of other terms and conditions, what do we like in the portfolio, whether we'll see competition from 3rd parties that will make basically kind of change our return assumption. So there's a lot of factors, but this does clear one of the remaining hurdles or should go a long way to clearing the remaining hurdle of Puerto Rico exposure. Question number 2, remind me again what that was?
Just whether you could structure anything using capital at the operating company level rather than at the holdco?
Yes. So our goal is to use, in every case we can, trapped capital in the operating companies because that obviously makes the most sense. As you're well aware, free capital at the holding company gives us a lot of flexibility for a multitude of purposes, including our dedication to capital management. So where possible, we will definitely use existing operating income existing operating capital that's trapped in the operating companies.
Okay, thanks. And just to sum it up, you could kind of rank order your interest in terms of capital allocation between buybacks and consolidating the ramp up businesses and perhaps growing the asset management business? How would you rank those?
Well, I think it's like which of your children do you like the most? But at the end of the day, I'd still say the most attractive of the 3 is capital management because it's got the biggest return. I mean, where we still trade at the discounts we're at is just a spectacular opportunity for us to continue to retire that stock. That makes sense.
Thank you, Ed.
You're welcome.
The next question comes from Brian Meredith with UBS. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning.
Good morning.
And congrats on everything. I guess my one big question here is one, Dominic or Rob, does the MAC consolidation at all free up any dividend capacity? And then 2, as an add on to that, do we need to see the court finalization or court agreement in order to kind of go and get a special dividend?
I'll take the first
go ahead, Rob.
I'll take the first part with Mac. Yes, so by taking out that trapped capital that was underneath our insurance companies and consolidating that or merging that within AGM, you're now going to increase investment income at our 2 main operating subsidiaries. So we do expect it to increase our dividend capacity this year modestly and next year more significantly because there are different rules regarding how much you could, dividend out between Maryland and New York. But it will increase our dividend capacity, Brian.
Okay, great.
And the second question, Brian?
Yes. Just with respect to getting asking for a special dividend, are you going to would you want to wait until you get a final agreement from the courts on Puerto Rico before you do that? Do you think we're at a point now that you can go ask the regulators for 1?
Well, let's go through the facts. So fact number 1 is we still believe capital management is the most accretive transaction we can do. Number 2, to get to our typical target of capital management, we need a special dividend. Number 3, we've had some impediments to request or to get a special dividend granted or even considered and the 2 being COVID and of course Puerto Rico. As we resolve those through this year, I think it does create an environment where that conversation can begin to be held with the regulators that we're responsible to.
Helpful. Thanks, y'all. Appreciate it.
Thanks, Brian. Thanks, Brian.
The next question comes from Geoffrey Dunn with Dowling and Partners. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning, guys.
Good morning, Geoff.
With respect to both the GEO, PBA as well as the HGA, CCBA, transport agreements, I think, am I right that unlike past deals here, the recovery is solely the new bonds and the CVIs. There is no other bond insurer considerations that we should be factoring in to the ultimate estimate recovers?
Well, you're leaving out one little piece, which is called cash. And remember, cash is king. So at the end of the day, there is a cash component to these settlements. Now, I think what you're referring to is opportunities that we have to basically make the settlement better by wrapping the bonds to get a higher value from them. And at this point in time, we've not considered that fully at all.
So we're just allowing the settlement and the estimates of recoveries to take place based on what's actually apparent in the documents that's available to everyone to read.
Okay. And then within the GEOs, are you able to help us narrow down, I don't know if this is publicly available information or not, but narrow down where in that recovery range of the deal your bonds fall?
Well, that's not that easy to figure out, right? Obviously, we have a good idea. We have the ability to see that. It's not been publicly disclosed. Remember, the problem you have with some of the statistics you're seeing is they include all creditors, not just bondholders or secured creditors.
They obviously don't include the CVI in a lot of the published reports. So they're only looking at cash and bonds and in some cases, they're just looking at new bonds. Because if you look at it from the Puerto Rican government point of view, they said, I had so much debt or so much bonds and what do I want to convince or tell people, I've gone I now have new debt with new debt requirements and I'm comparing the old bonds to the new bonds and kind of ignoring where cash and CVI falls out. So the numbers do substantially move about. As we've said, we're very comfortable with the settlements and I think that should give the market a pretty good indication of what we believe is our recovery rates.
Okay, great. Thank you. You're welcome.
This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Robert Tucker for closing remarks.
Thank you, operator, and I'd like to thank everyone for joining us on today's call. If you have additional questions, please feel free to give us a call. Thank you very much.