Good afternoon. My name is Vincent, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Q2 earnings call and February sales. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, then the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw a question, press the pound key. Thank you. I'll now turn the call over to your speaker today, Mr. Richard Galanti, CFO. Sir, you may begin.
Thank you, Vincent. Good afternoon to everyone. I'll start by stating that these discussions will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events, results, and/or performance to differ materially from those indicated by such statements. The risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to those outlined in today's call, as well as other risks identified from time to time in the company's public statements and reports filed with the SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the company does not undertake to update these statements except as required by law.
In today's press release, we reported operating results for the second quarter of fiscal 2019, the 12 weeks ended February 17th, as well as February retail sales for the four weeks ended this past Sunday, March 3rd. Note that the first two weeks of February fell into this second fiscal quarter, with weeks three and four of February are the first two weeks of our fiscal third quarter. The reported net income for the quarter came in at $889 million, or $2.01 per share, a 27% increase compared to the $701 million or $1.59 per share last year in the quarter. In terms of sales, net sales for the quarter came in at $34.63 billion, a 7.3% increase over the $32.28 billion reported last year in the second quarter.
Comparable sales for the second quarter, as shown in the press release for the 12 weeks on a reported basis, U.S. was 7.4%, Canada was -0.3%, other international 0.7%, for the total company of 5.4%. As well, e-commerce for the 12 weeks on a reported basis was 20.2%. Excluding gas deflation, the impact of FX and some weakening foreign currencies relative to the dollar, as well as revenue recognition, which is an impact this year, the 7.4% reported in the U.S. would have been a 7.2%. The -0.3% in Canada would be a +6.0%. Other international, instead of being 0.7% reported, would be +4.8%, with total company, the 5.4% reported would become a 6.7%. Again, e-commerce reported at 20.2%, ex gas, FX, and RevRec, 25.5% plus.
In terms of Q2 comp sales metrics, second quarter traffic or shopping frequency increased 4.9% worldwide and 5.2% in the U.S. Weakening foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impact sales by approximately 140 basis points, and gasoline price deflation was another minus 50 basis points of impact. RevRec actually benefited comp sales by about 55 basis points to the positive. These are the three factors that we adjust for and that are presented in today's release as the adjusted column. In addition, weather conditions adversely impacted Q2 sales by around a half a percentage point, and cannibalization weighed in on the comps by about minus 70 basis points. In terms of front-end transaction or what we call ticket, average front-end ticket was up 0.4% during the quarter and excluding the impacts from gas deflation, FX and RevRec, our average ticket was up approximately 1.8%.
Going down the income statement, membership fee income reported came in at $768 million, or 2.22%. That's up $52 million or 7.3% from a year ago. Again, with weak foreign currencies, if you adjusted for flat FX, that would make the up $52 million another $9 million up, or up $61 million dollar year over year ex FX. Reported membership revenue of the plus $52 million amount, a little more than $20 million of that related to the membership fee increases taken in June of 2017 in the U.S. and Canada. We're now nearing the end of that 23-month cycle to recognize the incremental benefit of the fee increases, what was known as deferred accounting into our P&L. The benefit to our P&L will be fully recognized in the next two quarters by the end of the fiscal year. But as with this last couple of quarters, it diminishes each quarter.
In Q3, we'll have about half the benefit recorded in Q2, and in Q4 will be a very small benefit. In terms of renewal rates in the second quarter, our U.S. and Canada member renewal rates in Q2 came in at 90.7%, up from 90.5% 12 weeks earlier at Q1 end. And worldwide, the rate improved to 88.3%, up from 88.0% at Q1 end. So improvement in our renewal rates. In terms of the number of members at Q2 end, member households and total cardholders, we ended Q1 12 weeks earlier with 52.2 million member households. At Q2 end, there was 52.7 million and total cardholders increased from 95.4 million at Q1 end, 12 weeks later at Q2 end, 96.3 million. During the quarter, we had one new opening in Coral Springs, Florida, and we also relocated a Miami location.
At Q2 end, our paid executive membership base stood right at $20 million. This is an increase during the quarter of 341,000 or about 28,000 per week since Q1 end. Now, this includes the recent introduction of the executive membership in Korea, which is our fifth country offering executive membership. For Q2, Korea contributed a little over half of those increases. Going down to gross margin line, reported gross margin in the quarter came in at 11.29%, up 31 basis points from last year's Q2 '18 of 10.98%. The 31 basis point improvement, ex gas, FX, and RevRec would be plus 30 basis points. I'll give you the chart. There's not a whole lot to it, given that the adjustment column is not that different than the reported column.
In terms of core merchandise, year-over-year in Q2 was up one basis point on a reported basis, as well ex the gas deflation and the RevRec, up one basis point. Ancillary businesses up 33 on a reported basis and up 32 on an adjusted basis. 2% reward, minus three and minus three basis points year-over-year. Then total, up 31 basis points, as I just mentioned, on a reported basis, and up 30 basis points ex gas deflation and RevRec. The core merchandise component, again, was higher by one basis point here. Looking at the core merchandise categories in relation to their own sales, what we call core on core, margins year-over-year were higher by eight basis points. Within the four key subcategories, both food and sundries and fresh foods were up a little, and softlines and hardlines were down a little. The net of the four departments on their own sales was up eight basis points.
Ancillary and other business gross margin was up 33 basis points, up 32 ex gas deflation and RevRec, up primarily driven by gas and also benefiting somewhat from e-com and a few other things. Moving to SG&A. Our SG&A percentage Q2 over Q2 was lower or better by two basis points, both with and without the adjustments, coming in at 10.0% of sales this year compared to 10.02% last year. In the chart that I normally give out, there really is not a whole lot to tell you. Operations was an improvement of two basis points in both columns. The other two line items that we usually point out, central and stock compensation expense, were zero and zero. The total remained at two basis points. Overall, two basis points better.
In terms of that two basis points better, we feel it was a pretty good result given that we're still facing the headwinds from the U.S. wage increases to our hourly employees that went into effect last June 11, 2018. As mentioned in the past couple of fiscal quarters, those wage increases negatively impacted SG&A by about 7 to 8 basis points during Q2 year-over-year. It'll continue to impact SG&A comparisons through Q3, which ends May 12, and into the first month of our 16-week fiscal fourth quarter to anniversary on that June 11. Additionally, this past Monday, we began our new three-year employee agreement. With the new agreement, we announced that we're taking our starting wages from $14 and $14.50 up to $15 and $15.50 per hour in both the U.S. and Canada.
In addition, we're also increasing wages for supervisors and also introduced paid bonding leave for all hourly employees. These items are incremental to the usual annual top of scale wage increases that are typically done each March. Collectively, these additional items will add about 3 to 4 basis points to SG&A over the next four quarters. Now, again, this is on top of that 7 to 8 basis point impact I just mentioned that will impact SG&A through this coming mid-June. Otherwise, pretty comparable year-over-year in terms of central and stock comp and other various SG&A expense line items. Next on the income statement is pre-opening. Pre-opening expenses were actually lower by $3 million, coming in this year at $9 million compared to $12 million last year. This year, again, we had two openings, one net opening and one relocation. Last year, we actually just had one opening.
There's other activities that relate to pre-opening as well. Year-over-year, primarily the difference was due to the $4 million in Q2 last year related to our opening of our new meat plant in Morris, Illinois, slightly offset by higher warehouse pre-opening this year due to the additional opening. All told, reported operating income in Q2 2019 was up 18.4%, coming in at $1,203 million this year compared to $1,016 million last year. Below the operating income line, reported interest expense was $3 million lower or better year-over-year, coming in at $34 million this year in Q2 as compared to $37 million last year. The actual interest expense quarter-over-quarter each year is about the same, a little delta and improvement in capitalized interest amounts. Interest income and other for the quarter was better by $39 million year-over-year.
Interest income itself was higher by $17 million year-over-year in the quarter, a combination of higher interest rates being realized and also higher invested cash balances. Also benefiting year-over-year comparison were the various FX items in the amount of $22 million. Recognize that much of this is essentially an offset to the lower reported operating income and earnings in our foreign operations due to the strength of the U.S. dollar versus many of the foreign currencies in the countries where we operate compared to last year. Overall, pre-tax income in Q2 is up 23%, coming in at $1,215 million this year compared to last year, $986 million. In terms of income taxes, our income tax rate was a little better than we had anticipated. Came in at 25.8% effective tax rate during Q2 2019 compared to 27.7% in Q2 last year.
For all of fiscal 2019, based on our current estimates, which again are subject to change, we anticipate that our effective total company tax rate for this fiscal year to be approximately 26%-26.5%. This figure is about a half a percentage point lower or better than we had previously estimated a quarter ago. This is primarily due to a Q2 tax rate that now includes a one-time benefit for certain foreign tax credits. This one-time tax benefit will continue through the end of this fiscal year, but we do not anticipate a similar type of benefit beyond fiscal 2019. A few other items of note. Again, we opened a net one unit during Q2, opened two, including a relo. In Q3, we have three new openings planned and no relos. We actually opened this morning in Bayonne, New Jersey.
In late April, we plan to open our 16th location in Korea, and in early May, our 11th location in Australia. The big expansion quarter for us this year is Q4. We plan to open a net of 12 units, 14 openings, including two relos, including our first opening in China, in Shanghai, in the city of Minhang, and also our third unit in Spain, which would be our second in the Madrid area. Any of these could slip a little bit, but our current best guess right now is 14 openings, including two relos, so a net of 12. As of Q2 end, total warehouse square footage stood at 112 million sq ft.
I might also add that in terms of CapEx, we continue to allocate more CapEx to grow and support our operations, including, as you know, over the last year, one and a half, we had opened a second meat plant, the first one in California many years ago, and then in Morris, Illinois. Also, a little while ago, our Canadian bakery commissary in Canada. We are under construction with the big chicken plant in Nebraska. We plan to start initial processing and production later this year. Depot expansion, we are doing that in many areas around the world. Also, just a month ago, I believe, we started up our first, what we will call fulfillment automation operation as part of our Mira Loma depot. This is for small packages for e-commerce, and we plan to do two more of those this year at other depots.
In terms of two-day grocery, which as you know, we started in October, about a year and a half ago. We did that out of 10 or 11 of our business centers around the country. We are in the process of moving these operations out of the 10 to 11 business centers to six of our depots over the next several months. I think we have done our first one, and we have got several more planned right around the end of spring, beginning of summer. In terms of stock buybacks in Q2, we expended $117 million to repurchase 561,000 shares at an average price of $208.72. The $117 million, of course, is significantly higher than the Q1 purchases of $35 million. In terms of e-commerce, overall, again, e-commerce sales increased during the quarter on a reported basis, 20.2%, and ex FX and RevRec, up 25.5%.
Continued increases in e-commerce in terms of orders and sales and profits and other metrics. Top growth categories in the quarter, quite a few actually. Grocery, consumer electronics, what we call majors, hardware, health and beauty aids, tire automotive, toy, seasonal, and apparel. We have now passed our one-year anniversary on the grocery launch, which was again a year ago October. Same-day grocery delivery is now available to members within a short drive of 99% of our U.S. locations. Two-day grocery is available anywhere throughout the continental United States. While still these are small pieces of our total business operation, they are growing nicely. We now have grocery shipments to all 50 states. In terms of e-commerce, in terms of new brands and items online during the quarter, we are now offering a much broader selection of Apple products, including the recent addition of MacBooks and iMacs.
Yes, you would expect good values to our members. Also, the first of what we expect several products from Sony. They have just started to arrive. In terms of health and beauty aids, new names like Living Proof shampoo and conditioner, Murad Skin Care, and Kate Somerville items. On the exercise front, NordicTrack is a new name. Finally, I had to point out the now somewhat famous 180 serving, 23 pound, 20-year shelf life macaroni and cheese for $89.99. If interested, you can find that online under emergency supplies and in a few of the Costco locations. We continue to improve our online and in-line cross-marketing initiatives, and we think that is continuing to drive our business.
In terms of buying online and pick up in store, in the quarter, we expanded our selection within the same categories, jewelry, some electronics, and handbags, and continue to test pickup lockers in 10 locations for this program. Lastly, this calendar year, we will begin e-commerce operations in Japan early summer, likely, and in Australia, late summer, early fall. Finally, I'll turn to our February sales results. The four weeks ended March 3rd, 2019, compared to the same period a year ago. As reported in our release, net sales for the month came in at $10.72 billion, an increase of 5.0% from $10.21 billion a year earlier. In terms of comparable sales, U.S., on a reported basis for the four weeks was 6.0%. Ex gas, FX, and RevRec, that 6.0% would be 5.7%. Canada, on a reported basis, 0. Ex gas, FX, and RevRec, +4.8%.
Other international reported -5.9%, again, adjusted with ex those things, -1.2%, such that total company came in at a 3.5% reported and at 4.6% ex those items. In terms of e-commerce reported for the four weeks, 24.2%. Ex those appropriate adjustments, 21.6% up. February sales were negatively impacted by weather throughout the U.S. and Canada in a big way. We estimate that negative impact on the total company was approximately 1%, and a little more than the 1% figure in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, Lunar New Year, Chinese New Year occurred in February, the same as last year, however, 11 days earlier this year. This is an important holiday in terms of sales strength. The holiday shift negatively impacted February's other international sales by, we estimate, a 450 basis points or 4.5 percentage points, and total company sales by about a half a percentage point.
Looking at January and February combined, effectively eliminating the impact of that holiday shift, the comp for other international for the eight weeks was 0.2% reported and +4.9% ex FX, gas deflation, and RevRec. U.S. regions with the strongest results in February were Midwest, Northeast, and Southeast. Internationally, the strongest results were Mexico, Japan, U.K., and Spain. Spain, of course, is relatively new with two locations. Foreign currencies year-over-year relative to the U.S. dollar hurt February comp sales in Canada by approximately 460 basis points. Other international also by about the same number of basis points, about 4.5 percentage points, and total company by an estimated 130 basis points. The negative impact of cannibalization was about 50 basis points to the negative in the U.S., 80 basis points in Canada, and 120 basis points in other international for a total company of -70 basis points.
Within ancillary businesses, hearing aids, optical, and food court had the best comp sales in February. Gas price deflation negatively impacted total reported comps by about 75 basis points. The average selling price during the four-week month compared to a year earlier was down 6.3% year-over-year. The average gallon a year ago, we sold for $2.74, this year, $2.56 a gallon. Including the adverse impact of weather and the holiday shift in Asia, our comp traffic or frequency for February, even after taking those into effect, taking that as impact into effect, and for February was up 2.7% worldwide and +3.2% in the U.S. For February, the average transaction was up at 0.8% for the month. This includes combined impacts from FX, gas deflation, and RevRec. That's about it in terms of our prepared notes.
Lastly, in terms of upcoming releases, we will announce our March sales results for the 5 weeks ending Sunday, April 7th on April 10th after the market closes. With that, I'll open up to Q&A and turn it back over to Vincent. Thank you.
At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Again, that will be star then the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile a Q&A roster. We have your first question coming from the line of Christopher Horvers from J.P. Morgan. Your line is now open.
Thanks. Good morning, Richard. A question on the core margins. The core margins performance this quarter was much better sequentially, I think, and everyone was sort of taken by surprise by the core margins ex gas in the last quarter, and now they're looking much better. Can you put it into context, what sort of drove that change, and any commentary about how you're thinking about core margins as you look forward?
Honestly, we drive our business by driving sales, and usually that means lowering prices on things, which we continue to do. We're also buying better all the time. Some of it's mix, some of it, the one category that shifted if you look back to the last few quarters or reports when we look at core on core, fresh foods has been a little down, and I think the key word there is little. I appreciate the fact that every basis point for us is $14 million plus pre-tax a year on 140-
Yeah
plus billion. You're talking about 5-10 basis point swings here. There's lots of things that impact it, whether it's freight, tariffs. Some went to the negative, some cases not as bad as we thought. I think we've done a great job, and we continue to do a great job, particularly in fresh with organics, where I believe there's a little less pricing pressure or competitive pressure. Don't get me wrong. As soon as we have a good quarter, the next quarter will change that. Not that I'm giving any guidance. We know that we keep it pretty steady, and we feel pretty good about it, whether it was up a few basis points or down a few basis points.
Got it. Just a question about the gas margins industry-wide. I understand there are a few ways that gas impacts margin, but if you just focus on the fact that it seems like the core cents per gallon has improved across the industry, the independents maybe, and the integrateds taken a little bit more, and that's given you some room to take a little bit more. Can you talk about what you're making sort of per gallon, I guess, relative to, say, last year and maybe a couple of years before that? As you think about the upcoming year, is there anything that you're seeing that would suggest that core profitability of every gallon sold is all of a sudden going to revert back to what it was a number of years ago?
I think over the last several years, the new normal is better. If you go back to when gas prices skyrocketed several years ago, and as they started coming down, what we saw and what we read, frankly, from others is that as they came down, not all of those savings were passed on to the consumer. They gave us perhaps a little bit bigger window. I think if you ask the people in charge of gas operations around here, we're saving the customer a little more today and making a little more because there's just a bigger opportunity of gap there. It really comes down to that. It is still a volatile, no pun intended, profitability item. It can swing back and forth based on underlying cost of goods sold that change daily. The new normal is better in all those examples. I'm sure there'll be quarters.
Q2 was a particularly good quarter. As I believe Q2 a year ago was a little better than the other three. That's not seasonal necessarily, it's just there's a lot of different factors. What's going on in the news internationally, what's going on with inventory levels, world and U.S. inventory levels, what's going on with inevitably, a refinery shuts down for two weeks for their planned repairs, and it takes four weeks. Any of those things, switching from winter to summer blend and back, all those things impact it. I think we're fortunate in the fact that we turn a lot of gas. We literally turn our inventory about daily and, as you know, we have locations with up to 24 pumps in there backed up all the time. It's great.
I think we're in a fortunate position that overall retailers, whether it's retailers that have gases in their parking lots, like supermarkets and discount stores and ourselves, or full line independent retailers or the ones with the convenience stores, I think everybody seems to have been taking a little more, and that's given us an ability to do so over the last couple of years. I guarantee you, it will be volatile and we'll always tell you that it was certainly a little more of the benefit this quarter than normal, but it was a year ago, too.
Just a quick one on that. Of the 30 odd basis points in ancillary this quarters, should we assume some portion of that comes out next year in the second quarter? Is there like anything that you would say is one time that we should put back next year in behalf of it?
I wouldn't use the word one time. I'd say unpredictable. It truly is not predictable. We know that when demand rises at the beginning of summer, that impacts everything. Gas prices has a little bit more positive pressure on them. When prices are going up, not only for us, but when I read the profitability of gas and other big retailers, supermarkets and Walmart alike, it impacts them as well. When prices are going up, we all make a little less. When prices are going down, we make a little more. We, I think, are in the enviable position of being extreme, and as overall, the retail environment has chose to make a little more, it gives us an ability to make a little more, a little less than a little more, and still make more, but even be a greater savings to our member.
That's the thing that we focus on. Are we saving our member more than we used to? And we are.
Understood. Thanks very much.
Your next question comes from the line of Simeon Gutman from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.
Hey, Richard. A follow-up on the gross margin or the core margin. You mentioned mix helped a little. Can you dig in anything about mix that was either seasonal or something that is changing? You said we've always lowered product acquisition costs. Can you remind us when your own chicken plant is coming up? One more in that mix. Can you tell if the channel mix between physical and digital, is that sort of embedded gross margin improving as well?
Well, yeah, overall, our gross margin online is a little lower than our company overall. Part of it's the product mix itself, and part of it is we're driving that business. That hasn't changed. That's been that way. We also work on a lower SG&A online, as you might expect. In terms of mix, there's so many different pieces to it, honestly. Part of it is when you walk into a Costco in the U.S., roughly 90% of the goods come through our cross-dock operations. For us, cross-docks are very profitable. It's the most cost-efficient way to ship stuff. Nobody can do that to the extent that we do it because of how we sell goods in pallet and large case quantities. There's lots of little pieces to it. I think private label and continuing penetration in private label, Fresh. All these are anecdotal.
There's no one thing that's driving in a particularly large direction. We think we're pretty good at what we do, and we're constantly buying better, even as it related to tariffs, which so far so good in terms of being on hold. We don't know what's going to happen in the future. I think bigger retailers have an ability to buy better.
Right. Shifting to SG&A, in the past, I think we've talked about as long as your comps hold up in mid-single digit, you're leveraging, and that was based on some imputed rate of spending. There was some IT, there was technology. Has anything on the spending side changed? Any curve that's increasing, decreasing, and that same mantra of about mid-single digit comps, that should still be able enough to give you leverage?
Hopefully it will. The word modernization, I think, has finally been retired around here. We're still spending a lot, and we're going to continue to spend a lot. As some of these new things come online, like the chicken plant, like the fulfillment automation, these are $50 million to $100 million-plus items, chicken plants more, where a bigger chunk of it is things like equipment and software that is depreciated over a shorter period of time than steel buildings. All those things are hitting us a little. I think the fact is we've been fortunate with our sales levels. As they go down, that'll hurt us a little. We're achieving our current SG&A with all the things that we haven't talked about, some of these other items that impact it the other way.
There are lots of little things, and we're not terribly worried, though, if some of these things, if sales were to come down a little and some of these things were going to impact it, so be it. We're going to do what we do and drive the top line.
Thanks, Richard.
The next question comes from the line of Chuck Grom from Gordon Haskett. Your line is now open.
Hey, good afternoon, Richard. Just on the pricing front, I'm curious how you guys are handling increases in certain categories, including any of those that may be impacted by tariffs. Just are you looking to pass along those increases? Do you think that may have helped out the core margins at all here in the second quarter?
I don't think it would've helped the margins. Its question is, did it hurt it or not hurt it? It probably hurt it less than one might think, but that, again, gets back to our ability to buy right. To the extent there's 10% tariff items in those examples versus 25%, that's a big difference. Some cases, you've got your vendors along with us feeding into that a little bit, sometimes not. I think it gets back, that's just one piece of what we do. The fact that organic helps us, the fact that KS helps us, the fact that we don't talk about, nor will we plan to a lot, all the marketing dollars that are out there now, that some of those impact cost of sales.
Okay. I guess just to follow up on Chris's question, you've had three consecutive quarters in a row of the core being negative, and then this quarter it flips to positive. Is there anything else you could point to?
I wouldn't read a lot. Look, we're happy about it, and hopefully you're happy about it. It's how we run our business. We didn't sit there and say, "Hey, let's get it up a little higher." I know we're a basis point company, and for you guys who have known us for 30 plus years, we talk basis points. It's some minor switches. It's nothing that we've changed dramatically. There's so many different moving parts to it, frankly.
Understood. I guess the other bright spot here in the quarter was the renewal rates are ticking up nicely. If you look back at the cadence in 2018, they were pretty steady, but they're showing a nice uptick both in the U.S. and worldwide. Just wondering if you could comment on that improvement.
Well, we like it. Look, we focus on all the things that we feel we should be focusing on, customer service, great products, great services at the best prices. We've been fortunate, notwithstanding the fact that we really don't have a PR department per se, that there's been a lot of good press about us, about Kirkland Signature, about our e-commerce site and customer satisfaction. I think that we've been blessed that some of the weaknesses that traditional brick and mortars or traditional formats have had, in some ways have helped certain other discounters like ourselves. Hopefully that'll continue.
Great. Thanks.
Your next question comes from the line of Edward Kelly from Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Yeah. Hi, good afternoon, Richard. I wanted to start with just a follow-up on fuel. If we were thinking about trying to strip out fuel and the impact, do we take the majority of the 33 basis points in order to do that? Then is there any intentional reinvestment to sort of consider as we think about this?
On the latter part of the question, there's no intentional reinvestment. There's 100 different moving parts to our company all the time, and we do what we feel is right. It was kind of like the question I was asked a year ago. We were asked about, with the extra earnings from the lower tax rate, will that change what we're doing with automation, online fulfillment or whatever else? The answer was, of course, no. We've got more cash than we spend. This will add to that, and that's all good. We're constantly figuring out what other things we can do there. What was the first part of the question? I'm sorry.
It's just-
Oh, stripping out fuel.
Trying to Yeah.
Well, we don't disclose every component. It certainly was the biggest piece of it.
Okay. In the last quarter, you mentioned a little bit of competitive pressure, specifically talked about Sam's and Fresh. I'm just curious if you could give us an update on the competitive backdrop, what you're seeing. As part of this, it seems like we're starting to see maybe a little bit of food price inflation. Just curious on your thoughts on pass through, I guess, and expectations for the year.
Well, I think the key word on price on inflation is little. We're not seeing, other than the tariff impacts on things, but in terms of food and what have you, it is frankly very little.
We're the last to go up a little bit.
Over time, it'll go up. Our comments over the years have continually be, we'll be the last to go up and the first to go down, and I think that holds true as well. In terms of the comment last time on Sam's, that was an interesting comment because I think after the call, the headline in the press was, is that's why margins were down. The fact of the matter is we call it out because we're pretty transparent. Sam's and others, but Sam's has been more competitive, and as are we. That's the nature of the business, and it has been for 30 years. We see that continuing, and I think the fact that it's continuing, we still show improvement in some of these things is a good sign for us.
Great. Thanks, guys.
Next question comes from the line of David Schick from Consumer Edge Research. Your line is now open. David Schick, your line is now open. The next question comes from the line of Karen Short from Barclays. Your line is now open.
Hey, thanks very much. Sorry to harp on this gas margin question, or gas profit question, but is there any way you could just help us get a feel for how much it benefited EPS this quarter? Because the data we saw on gas margins for the quarter throughout your whole market area was just astronomically high gas margins.
When you say our area, throughout the United States?
Well, we map it by stores by state.
Okay.
West Coast was particularly strong.
Yeah. We don't disclose that. Again, it was well more than half, but not all.
Okay. I guess just wondering a little bit, in terms of the wage increase that you called out for March, is there anything to think about in terms of the basis point impact as we get into the next quarter?
Yes. Starting March 4th, this past Sunday, I think as I indicated, on top of the seven to eight that'll continue through June 11th, if you will, all through Q3 and the first four weeks of the 16 weeks fourth quarter. Effective March 4th, we'll have that additional on top of that three to four basis points.
Okay. The year-over-year-
That three to four will be March 4th to March 3rd of 2020, if you will.
Three to four basis point. Okay.
Yeah.
Just wondering if you could call anything out in terms of tax refund data, like in terms of your expectations on driving sales. I know there's a lot of noise on the timeline of that, but any color what you're thinking it will do to comps or not do, I guess?
Well, honestly, I haven't heard anybody here talk about that, and I've read some of the same things that you've read. It started off, it appeared it was a little lower, and now then appeared it was a little higher, not a lot higher, but a little higher. Typically, on a macro basis, that impacts retail overall, and on whatever impact it has for that, it's typically a little less to us. That's what we've seen historically, whether it was a change in tax rates or dividend rates or you name it, EBT, food stamps. Whenever there's any kind of macro change that impacts retail across the U.S., there's a little bit of less of an impact to us. We've not really seen or even know how to answer that.
Okay. Just last question. I know that you don't want to have people get in the habit of assuming that there'll be a special dividend on a regular basis, but any thoughts on your philosophy on that as it relates to the timing within this year? Because we're at the two-year mark.
Yeah. Our thoughts continue as they have been. The three we did were about two and a quarter years apart, but that doesn't mean anything going forward. It's still a topic on the table, and we continue to talk about it along with other things. Really, not a whole lot of news to tell you about.
Okay. Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you.
The next question comes from the line of John Heinbockel from Guggenheim Securities. Your line is now open.
Richard, what are you guys seeing with regard to inbound freight? Is that a slight directional drag? If anything, what are you doing to mitigate that?
I'm shooting from the hip a little on this one, but I believe while it's been up a little bit because of new restrictions on how many hours long haulers can drive and just capacity and truck capacity out there, it's going up for everybody. I believe we internally look at it in our freight department as a freight factor, a premium factor or fuel factor, whatever we call it, I forget. It's up a little less than it was a couple of months ago, but it's still up. It's come down a little bit from where it was, but it's still up from a year ago is my guess.
Okay. You've had the adjustment item, right, in gross margin related to some supply chain investments, not there now. Is that now gone for the duration, or does that come back with other supply chain investments that you might make, whether it's the chicken plant or other depots?
Yeah. One of the things was the return centers we talked about for a few quarters.
Yep.
I think there's more things happening that impact us a little bit negatively to start. We open a new meat plant, major capital expenditure. First, it takes a few things out of our Tracy meat plant that goes to the East Coast. With Tracy, we couldn't accommodate all our needs just from that plant. Then you've got a new plant that's starting with its own, even though we know how to run one, it has its innate inefficiencies when you first start, and it's low and not full capacity. Same thing with the commissary, which was more of a learning experience two years ago, over the last two years up in Canada. I think all these things will impact us.
A comment I made earlier is we're not going to point out each one of these, but in the aggregate, my guess it's still a little bit of a drag, which is offset by other things, most particularly sales.
All right. Lastly, there was a period there where you had stepped up growth of business centers for a period of time. What's the philosophy now on where they go, U.S. or internationally, as part of your expansion over the next couple of years?
I think right now we have one in Canada and what? 16, I believe, or 16 in the U.S. I would expect one or two a year for the next couple of years, which is not really a change of what we thought. The change was several years ago when we went from zero to eight over a million years, over a long period of time. We started opening a couple a year. We'll continue to open a few, but it's part of the plan, but our focus is regular warehouses and quite frankly, a lot of the infrastructure things that we're doing now.
All right.
We'll continue to do it in a bigger way.
Yep. Thanks.
The next question comes from the line of Scot Ciccarelli from RBC Capital. Your line is now open.
Hi, guys. Scot Ciccarelli. Richard, with your first opening in China coming up, what is the best way to think about U.S. versus international store openings over the next, call it, two to three years? Related to that, any reason why we should see international profitability levels decline as you start to move into some of these new markets like China?
Well, first of all, if you'd asked us five, six, seven years ago by now, what percentage of our units would be outside of the U.S. and Canada. I include Canada as part of the original mature, fully grown out area. That by now we'd probably be 50/50 international outside of U.S. and Canada. We're not. It's 65/35, 70/30 U.S., Canada still. Part of that is the opportunities that we've had in the U.S. and Canada. Part of it is the pipeline's taking a little longer elsewhere. I think you'll continue to see that change in the directions toward more international, but I can't sit here and tell you that it'll be 50/50 three years from now or five years from now. Clearly we've got more things going on.
As it relates, whenever we go into a new country, it's almost by definition, you're going to lose money for the first few years, even if that first location or two contributes a small amount of profitability, if it does, because you still have the central expense of the whole full thing, the infrastructure. I look back at Japan. When we first went to Japan, we opened six units in the first five years. The goal was to be at breakeven at the end of year five. I think we beat it by about 10 months.
At the end of the day, fast-forward another 10, 12 years past those five years. We now have in the high 20s, and we'll grow from there faster and more profitable than it was in that midterm when we were opening several units on a small base, but it takes time. As we go into France, as we went into Spain, by definition, those are going to add more to the bottom line sales in that calculation of return on sales. Sometimes even subtract a little at the top. The key is balancing a little of that. I think we're big enough now that even if we overdo it a little bit on some of that new stuff, it's okay. We'll let you know if it costs us an extra basis point or two.
Got it. Okay. Thanks, guys.
Why don't we have two more questions?
Next question comes from the line of Michael Baker from Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Thank you. A couple of clarifications. One, to Karen Short's question, you said that gas was about half of it, a little more than half or a little less than half of it. Half of what? Was that the year-over-year increase in earnings or operating profit $?
No. First of all, I said it was more than half. I didn't say it was a little over half. It's substantial, but we try not to be that specific. Clearly, there's a lot of things that helped our earnings this quarter, year-over-year, as evidenced by even improvement in core on core. The fact is evidenced by there's things that hurt you a little bit that we don't pick out each one. Gas certainly helped, but again, I think Karen had mentioned she's done some studies in terms of profitability, and it's a good piece of it, but it's not entirely. There's other things.
That's what I'm trying to clarify.
There's other things that benefited it and other things that hurt it a little, too.
It being the growth in earnings?
Well, gross margin and earnings, ultimately.
Okay. Thank you. Understood. One other question. I thought that you said that the ancillary margins were helped mostly by gas, we get that, but you also said helped by e-commerce. Are your e-commerce margins getting better year-over-year? If so, why is that?
I believe the e-commerce bottom line margin improved a little, but also the sales are stronger than the rest of the company. It's penetration as well.
Okay. Understood. Last real quick, SNAP. Any benefit from the pull forward in SNAP? I don't know how much of it is your customer, but it's helped others.
No. We really don't see any of that. I mean, very little of it. Those kind of things don't really impact us.
Understood. Appreciate the clarifications. Thank you.
Thank you.
Last question comes from the line of Scott Mushkin from Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.
Hey, Richard. Thanks for taking my questions. I just wanted to go back to e-commerce. I know you touched on it in the quarter that it was a little helpful to margins, but you're putting a lot of money into it sounds like, two-day, one-day grocery. I was wondering if you could walk us forward on e-commerce and where you think it's going to do to margins as you go forward.
Well, every company allocates things or puts things in silos. In our e-commerce, the one-day grocery is not part of e-commerce. Even though you go online to order, it's really the Instacart engine, and it's in-warehouse. They come into our warehouses, they shop, they deliver.
The same.
The same day. That's not part of the e-commerce numbers. That and a couple other things would actually increase the percentage increases a little bit, but it's still so small, it wouldn't have that much of an impact.
The rest of the e-commerce business as you, I think you said you're building out some fulfillment, for e-commerce, I think it's for more consumables.
Right.
How are you guys thinking about margins on that business as we move forward? The mix is going to shift, I think.
Well, it has shifted. As you know, a few years ago, the average ticket was $400 or something because we sold big-ticket items. We didn't have lots of little things or things that got you back to the site more frequently and more regularly. Some of that's just starting. As I talked about, the first of three planned fulfillment, what we are calling fulfillment automation centers, we have our first one in Southern California. It's literally open less than eight weeks, I believe. It's over $100 million investment. First one's the most expensive because you developed all the systems and everything as well. We have two other planned for depots in other parts of the country. I would hope that that's something that's going to hit our number a little bit because it means we're doing well in it as we grow in it.
We're going to see the cost of picking an item dramatically reduced because we've done it not quite manually, but less automated than we can well do over time. That's going to be an ebb and flow over time. We'll just see how it goes. I think in the scheme of things, recognizing that e-commerce in its entirety is still, what, 5%-6% of our business, 5% plus of our business. Even as we hope and assume that it's going to grow at a higher rate than the rest of the company, it's still going to be in the single digits for a while. Those impacts and even with the first one, you're talking about the inefficiencies of getting something open and running and building it up over the first 6-12 months, and then the associated depreciation and like.
Those things in the scheme of things are not huge. As we do three and four and five of them, it's a little bigger. Is one chicken plant, so is one new concept bakery commissary a few years ago. All these things will be, I would think these two things will help to balance some of them, but if they're a little drag, that's a positive.
Last, I guess the last question, February sales and traffic, anything to read there? Seems like it was a little slower than we've been seeing. Any thoughts there? Any reads?
Look, I think we more than anybody hate to use the word weather as a reason and you see it every day. Clearly, whether it was rain, snow, colds, you name it, that impacts things like patio furniture, spring wear. I think if you X out the things we try to, as I pointed out on the call, if you X the weather, which we assume, I think I said it was 1% in the month for the full company, a little more therefore in the U.S. and Canada. We try to err to the conservative assumption on that. I mean, it's not a lot more than that, but we feel comfortable in talking to the operators of the impact.
If you add that back in, you add the holiday shift in Asia, you take those things out, we're a little lower, not a lot lower than we've been enjoying for the last several months. I guess we'll have to wait and see how March is.
See how March is, exactly. All right. Thank you so much. Take care.
Thank you. Thank you, Vincent, and we'll be around to answer questions. Thank you.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.