Thank you for standing by. My name is Brianna, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the DT Midstream 1st quarter 2023 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press star 1. Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Todd Lohrmann, Director of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.
Good morning and welcome, everyone. Before we get started, I would like to remind you to read the safe harbor statement on page 2 of the presentation, including the reference to forward-looking statements. Our presentation also includes references to non-GAAP financial measures. Following the successful issuance of debt at NEXUS Pipeline, we are modifying our adjusted EBITDA calculation to reflect full proportional EBITDA from our equity method investees. Please refer to the updated definition of adjusted EBITDA and the reconciliation to GAAP contained in the appendix, as well as the definitions and reconciliations of our other non-GAAP financial measures. The appendix also contains details on the debt balances and interest expense at our equity method investees. Joining me this morning are David Slater, President and CEO, and Jeff Jewell, Executive Vice President and CFO. I'll now turn it over to David to start the call.
Thanks, Todd, good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining. I am pleased to report we had another strong quarter, with both business segments delivering great results that are in line with our full year plan. As I communicated on our year-end call, we expect growth to be weighted towards the second half of the year as we bring projects online. Standing here today, I'm confident in our full year guidance range for 2023 and early outlook range for 2024. All of our key growth projects remain on budget and on schedule. During the quarter, we made significant progress de-risking these projects by completing major construction activities and firming up project costs. Approximately 80% of the overall growth project capital costs have been locked in through our spend to date and committed procurement contracts.
I'd like to give a big thanks to the entire team for their dedication as they work to ensure these projects meet the expected in-service dates for our customers. I also want to commend our employees for their excellent safety performance with no recordable safety incidences so far this year. We are continuing to advance our CCS opportunity in Louisiana following the acceptance of our Class VI well permit application by the EPA. We have completed seismic surveys and continue to evaluate geological characteristics in support of our application. Last Friday, the EPA announced they are opening a public comment window on a proposal to grant the state of Louisiana's request for primacy over Class VI injection wells.
We are very encouraged by this announcement and will continue to work closely with both the EPA and the state of Louisiana as we advance the project towards a final investment decision. I wanna take a moment to address the natural gas fundamentals and share our observations on producer activity levels. We are starting to see rig reductions in response to the low gas price environment. Recently announced customer activity reductions in our footprint are fully contemplated in our guidance, and our long-term view on the market remains very constructive. The resource areas served by our assets are Tier 1, with a long runway of highly economic drillable well locations. There is also a high drilled and uncompleted well inventory in the basins that we operate in, especially in the Haynesville, where the DUC inventory has grown significantly.
On the demand side, LNG feed gas is at record levels following the return of Freeport LNG, and the next wave of new export facilities is quickly approaching. Power demand for natural gas is running well above last year, and the potential increased power burn, especially if we have a hot summer, could accelerate the tightening of the market. Our asset footprint with wellhead-to-market connectivity serving the two best dry gas basins provides advantages in this very dynamic market. Our pipelines serve growing and durable demand centers, and the pipeline segment has increased from approximately 50% of our business mix in 2021 to closely 65% today. We continue to add to our backlog of organic business development opportunities with our focus on short cycle, right-sized growth investments.
We recently added two new producers to our Haynesville system, and at our storage complex we are contracting into a favorable pricing environment. Now, I'll pass it over to Jeff to walk you through our quarterly financials and outlook.
Thanks, David. Good morning everyone. In the first quarter, we delivered overall adjusted EBITDA of $225 million. Our pipeline segment results reflect continued strong performance at our storage complex and our pipeline joint ventures, offset by reduced short-term revenues following a strong fourth quarter. Our gathering segment results were in line with the fourth quarter, except for the $2 million impact from the transferring our Michigan gathering asset to the pipeline segment following the service conversion and the start of the new 20-year transport contract. Operationally, total gathering volumes across both the Haynesville and the Northeast averaged approximately 3 billion cu ft a day in the first quarter. We expect gathering volume growth to be back-half-weighted this year, which is driven by the in-service of our expansion projects and timing of customer activity.
Growth CapEx for the quarter was $227 million as we made significant progress de-risking our organic growth projects. We are maintaining our full-year growth CapEx range of $575 million-$650 million. Our total committed growth capital remains approximately $800 million and is slated for organic growth projects. The committed total, which is inclusive of our 2023 investment, implies a significant step down in capital spend in 2024. We recently took the opportunity to further optimize our balance sheet with the issuance of $750 million of new investment-grade debt at NEXUS Pipeline, with DTM's proportional share being approximately $375 million. Funds from the transaction will be distributed in early May and will be used to support organic growth and pay down our revolving credit facility.
This transaction will free up additional liquidity and provide interest expense savings. Overall, we are very pleased with the results of this financing. We remain committed to the strength of our balance sheet and our four times long-term leverage ratio ceiling. As Todd mentioned, we are modifying our adjusted EBITDA metric, which impacts our adjusted EBITDA guidance. The updated 2023 guidance can be found on page six in the earnings presentation. This update to our guidance solely reflects the change in our adjusted EBITDA metric and does not reflect any changes to the base business. I'll now pass it back over to David for closing remarks.
Thanks, Jeff. In summary, we feel really good about our full-year guidance range for 2023 and our early outlook range for 2024. Our construction projects have been significantly de-risked and are primarily backed by take-or-pay contracts. We continue to have a healthy business development inventory of organic growth projects and expect that improving market fundamentals over the course of the year will yield additional opportunities. We can now open up the line for questions.
At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, you must press star and the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Spiro Dounis with Citi. Your line is now open.
Thanks, operator. Morning, guys. First question. You know, you guys mentioned that the natural gas prices to some degree have an impact on rigs here in the near term. Just curious, as you sort of think out, it sounds like your outlook really hasn't changed when we think longer term. I know one thing you all are pursuing was an expansion of LEAP towards 3 Bcf a day at some point. Just curious if you could maybe just walk us through customer interest levels on continuing that expansion now versus maybe a quarter or two ago, and how you're thinking about the timing of that potential expansion.
Sure can, Spiro. Great question. We continue to have really active dialogue with a series of customers on the next phase of LEAP expansion. As we sit here today, we're, you know, mid-2023, and that 2025, 2026 next wave of LNG is quickly approaching. I think one of the advantages that we offer the market is our ability to expand in what I'll call bite-sized increments, just like, you know, phase one, two, and three were. We continue to have a lot of customers interested in incremental LEAP capacity. Again, I think just recognizing the environment we're in, we're in a bit of a weak moment in the commodity cycle right now.
I think most of those customers are very self-aware of that and, you know, wanna have things kind of lined out and ready to go when they're prepared to make those the next incremental commitment. You know, we feel real good about our competitive position. We've done really well in what I'll call the first wave of the expansion work. We punched above our weight, and were able to contract a large portion of the market share, and I expect the same thing will happen in the second wave.
Got it. Thanks for that color. Second one, maybe just going to the new EBITDA methodology. Two-part question on this one. First, I guess, what was the thinking in not sort of keeping it the way it was and reducing that EBITDA? By the interest levels, especially now that you're gonna have a little bit more JV debt, would seem like that gap or that variable, between EBITDA to cash flow will also get a little bit bigger now. Then the second part of that question, as we think about the 2024 preliminary outlook, that did not change, to reflect this methodology it looks like. Any sort of reasoning behind that or just sort of too early?
Hey, good morning. Yeah, this is Jeff Jewell. I'll take the first piece, and then Dave will hop on the 24. Yeah. For us, it was pretty simple. We just wanna make sure that we're being transparent and simple. Again, that's a well-known approach of when you've got material JV debt that you sort of move to a proportional reporting method. That's what we're trying to do. Obviously, with the NEXUS, you know, that was a material change in our JV debt, that's why we're doing it now. Of course, we really like the JV debt, being able to finance at that level because we're able to do it investment grade, non-recourse.
As you can see the rate that we got, we're just tickled pink with that, with that rate that we've got. We can do it at a lower cost. That's kind of why we made the change at this time.
Yeah, maybe I'll pick up on the second half. I'll comment briefly on NEXUS. It was always contemplated that at the right time, in the evolution of that pipe, we would put JV level debt on it. In terms of 2024, you know, there's puts and takes every quarter on forward-looking guidance and, you know, this is no different. We have puts and takes in 2024. It hasn't changed our view on our confidence in our 2024 guidance. It's been our practice that we'll, you know, we'll refresh 2024 typically at the end of the current year and as we bring it into the current prompt year cycle. That's just kind of been our practice here. No concerns there.
Got it. Understood. That's all I had today, guys. Thanks as always for the color.
Great.
Thanks for the questions. Yep.
Your next question comes from Michael Blum with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Just wanted to make sure I understand a couple things. On slide 11, I think you reiterate your long-term 4x leverage ratio ceiling. Just wanted to understand that a little bit better. Would you allow yourself to go above that in the short term if you had good line of sight that you'd get back below 4 within a reasonable amount of time? Or is that what long term means on that slide now? Or is that really like a hard cap at 4x ?
Hi, Michael. It's Jeff. No, again, another good, very good question. You, you're right. Our commitment is to the long-term 4x , you know, which includes the proportional. Just so that we're clear on that. And again, why we're comfortable with that 4x is 'cause, you know, we've got a high degree of demand contracts, stable cash flows, and you know, we have no direct commodity exposure. That's why we feel good with that 4. You're spot on. With the investment profile that we currently have, you know, we are gonna be temporarily over that 4 x, probably by at the end of this year.
With our plan, we feel that we're gonna be able to de-lever down into the mid-3s, you know, over the, you know, over the next several years on how things are gonna play out.
Got it. Thanks for that. Then just wanted to ask about the increase in storage rates. I wonder if you can just quantify maybe uplift, in terms of either contribution or just like rate of change, how much upside are you seeing in storage rates.
Yeah, Michael, we've just seen a really strong storage market, present itself over the last probably 5-6 months. We had a significant amount of capacity rolling actually in our portfolio, just the way we have that portfolio structured. The commercial team's been doing just an excellent job, here in the first quarter, renewing a number of contracts and capturing these higher rates. We're probably seeing rates that are, geez, 40%-60% higher than we've seen perhaps last year, in the storage market. We're really encouraged by that. You know, I think we have talked to you folks about the storage market in the past, and I'd say a couple of years ago, we were sort of, in the trough, if I can use that term.
In the storage market, it was a pretty weak storage market, and we were intentionally not terming out capacity in that weak market. As the market has materially improved, and I think it's a function of just a higher volatility in the energy complex here in North America, we're looking to take advantage of that and contract up and term out to the extent that we can inside our storage business. That's a bright star in the portfolio at the moment, and it's always nice to have a diversified portfolio.
Got it. perfect. Just last one for me. I just apologize if I missed this, but have you declared the dividend for the first quarter? Thanks.
We have not, but we expect that'll be coming shortly. We have a board meeting later this week, so stay tuned on that one.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Robert Mosca with Mizuho. Your line is now open.
Thanks, everyone. I was wondering if you could provide any additional color on those two new producers you signed up in the Haynesville. Also, you know, I think a couple years back, you announced some contracts with new customers on Blue Union. Just wondering if you could update us with respect to, I guess, the tenor and bond commitments on those or expectations. Could that be a potential headwind to Haynesville volume in the short term?
Yeah. Yeah, Rob, thanks for the question. We did. We signed up two new customers. You know, I think as you know, over the last couple years, it was one of our strategic objectives, is we wanted to bring on more new customers onto the Haynesville platform and start to diversify that platform a little bit. These new customers, I can't get into the details other than I'll just characterize the type of producers they are. They're both smaller private producers. They're long-term contracts with dedications to our network. I think what was really encouraging for me to observe as the commercial team that's been working this is the value that these new customers see in our network. We have a wellhead to market network in the Haynesville.
You know, I'll call it a wellhead to water network to the LNG Gillis procurement location. They really saw a lot of value in that, where they could deal with one company, just plug into the network and they're ready to go, so to speak. We expect those two customers to come on towards the end of the year. Yeah, just encouraged by the efforts of the team to be able to do that, and we just continue to add counterparties to the network and diversify the network and grow the network.
No, that's helpful. Maybe just on those contracts that you'd signed a couple years back. I'm not sure if those were kind of more short-term offload agreements, or were those long-term contracts as well?
Those customers are still on the system and they're actually growing their volume on the system. I'm just recalling in my mind right now, Rob, what we disclosed on those, on those customers. Yeah, I would characterize them as longer term customers on the system.
Okay, great. That's, that's helpful. Then maybe for that 20% of committed CapEx that is in de-risk, so to speak, I mean, which projects, could you talk about which projects those relate to specifically, and whether you're seeing anything above or below what you initially modeled in that $800 million bucket?
Yeah. Let's just start at the highest level. We're very confident in our capital costs on all of our projects, both in the north and in the south. 80% of that capital, as you just pointed out, has been de-risked slash/locked in. I'd say the open portion, the 20% that's open is primarily related to the install costs. It's what I'll call labor and the mechanical of putting it together, so to speak. All the projects are running on schedule.
As I called out in my opening remarks, I think our construction team has done a fabulous job in a very difficult environment with significant cost pressures coming from all sides and delivery schedule pressures coming from all sides to hold the budget and hold the schedule for our customers so that we can deliver these products on time for our customers. Feel really good about the de-risking on the capital side. You know, maybe just some additional commentary on why we feel good about our guidance for this year. Just to remind everybody, the gathering side of our business now only represents about 35% of our business, I'll just start there.
All the wells that need to be drilled and brought online to support the expansion work that we're doing here in 2023, 75% of those wells have either been drilled and completed and are waiting on the facilities or are being drilled as we speak. That gives us a lot of confidence in that portion of our business, which is just one piece of our, of our total business in terms of what we're gonna deliver here in 2023.
Great. That's helpful. Thanks, everyone.
Again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from Alex Kania with Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.
Great. Thanks. Good morning. Maybe two questions. First, just probably a quick one. You know, a lot of talk on Haynesville activities, but just, you know, is there any kind of changes in tone that you're hearing from, you know, your Appalachian producer counterparties there in the gas environment? The second one maybe just with respect to CCS. Can you remind us just what the timeline may end up being right now just with respect to, you know, the federal EPA process or maybe how you see the, you know, the primacy discussions moving forward on Louisiana, just to maybe get a sense of when, you know, you could potentially get to a FID timing decision?
Sure, Alex. I'll start with Appalachia. Those percentages that I just quoted previously in terms of the activity we're seeing that supports our growth this year, that covers our total gathering business. It reflects both Appalachia and Haynesville. We continue to see our customers performing what we would expect them to perform in terms of our expansions in Appalachia. A more general comment about Appalachia, we continue to see the activity. You've heard some of the public's. There's a moderation occurring in Appalachia, but probably not to the same extent that we're seeing in the Haynesville. My sense is it's primarily related to cost. There is a lot more inflationary cost pressure in the Haynesville than there was in Appalachia.
I think, and this is just my view, is that I think producers are sending a little signal into the service sector in Haynesville right now that they need to bring their costs in line. I expect that will play out here over the summer, that there'll be a cost acknowledgement and adjustment that will support continued drilling in the back half of the year. I also sense that, you know, market fundamentals, I think the ship will right itself towards the back end of the year here, the second half of the year. We certainly still see pretty strong price signals in, you know, Cal 2024, Cal 2025. You know, I think it's upper $3 in 2024 and low $4 in 2025. Pretty healthy numbers in either basin for producers to drill into.
That's kind of what we're hearing at a high level in the market. I hope that's helpful. Your second question related to CCS in Louisiana. You know, we've kind of publicly said timing for us is sort of the back end of 2025. Just to remind everybody, for our project, our project involves the capture, our capturing emissions from our own facilities in the Haynesville. We will pipe it, and we will sequester it. We're doing all three components in this project. We've been working hand-in-hand with both the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and the EPA with the expectation that at some point the primacy would shift to Louisiana.
Both parties have been sort of in the tent with us from day one and fully aware of all the work that has been done and that we're planning to do to support the application. We're encouraged by the letter last week. We know that Louisiana is very supportive of CCS within the state to support both their industrial base and their resource base in the state. We look forward to working with the state assuming the primacy does shift.
Thanks very much.
Your next question comes from Robert Mosca with Mizuho. Your line is now open.
Hey, thanks. Just a quick follow-up here. Just wondering if you could address the decline in Haynesville volumes quarter-over-quarter. What drove that?
Yeah, Rob, It wasn't anything more than just the timing of well completions. I think we had a similar phenomena last year. I think we kind of The first half of the year tends to be a little lower, and we tend to see the ramps in the second half of the year. That seems to be the pattern of our largest customer. Again, I It was fully contemplated in our plan and in our guidance. We're very happy with Q1. We are, you know, on track for full year guidance based on our Q1 results.
All right. Thanks, everyone.
There are no further questions at this time. David Slater, I turn the call back over to you.
Well, thanks, everybody, for joining us today, and we certainly appreciate your support and interest. I look forward to seeing many of you later in the month at EIC. Have a great day.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.