Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to JPMorgan Chase's Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. This call is being recorded. Your line will be muted for the duration of the call. We will now go live to the presentation.
Please stand by. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to JPMorgan Chase's Chairman and CEO, Jamie Dimon and Chief Financial Officer, Jennifer Pipsak. Ms. Pipsak, please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Before I get started, I'd like to thank Mary Anne for nearly 7 years as CFO and for her support of me over many years, but particularly her support during my transition into this role. So a huge thanks to Maryann.
And I just want to add my thanks too. I think Maryann, as you all know, did a great job, smart, honest, thoughtful, help make the the company a better company. So all of our thanks, Doctor. Mary Anne, and we all know that Jen is going to do a great job too.
Thank you, Jamie. Okay. So now on to the presentation, which as always is available on our website and we ask that you please refer to the disclaimer at the back of the presentation. Starting on Page 1, the firm reported record net income of $9,700,000,000 and EPS of $2.82 on revenue of $29,600,000,000 with a return on tangible common equity of 20%. Included in these results are tax benefits of $768,000,000 related to the resolution of a number of tax audits.
Adjusting for this, as well as a few other notable items that largely offset, we delivered an 18% ROTCE this quarter. Underlying performance for the quarter was strong with highlights including client investment assets and consumer banking up 16%, largely driven by net new money flows. In card, 11% growth in sales and 8% growth in outstandings, number 1 in global IBCs year to date, gaining share across all products and regions, steady results in the commercial bank with net income of $1,000,000,000 while continuing to invest in the business and in asset and wealth management, record long term AUM and client assets. Overall for the firm, total loan growth was 2% year on year, but down 1% sequentially. Important to note here that these variances include the impact of loan sales and home lending as we continue to optimize our usage of capital and liquidity across the firm.
Credit performance remains strong across businesses and we delivered another quarter of positive operating leverage. Now on to Page 2 and some more detail about our 2nd quarter results. Revenue of $29,600,000,000 was up $1,200,000,000 or 4% year on year as net interest income was up approximately $900,000,000 or 7% on balance sheet growth and mix as well as higher rates. And non interest revenue was up approximately $300,000,000 year on year, largely driven by the absence of the card rewards liability adjustment we spoke in the prior year. Excluding that variance and the other offsetting notable items I mentioned, non interest revenue was about flat with strong performance in consumer across auto lease, home lending production and consumer and business banking, offset by lower markets revenue and IBP as previously guided.
Expenses of $16,300,000,000 were up 2% related to continued investments in our businesses, partially offset by a reduction in FDIC charges of approximately $250,000,000 Credit remains favorable with credit costs of $1,100,000,000 down 5 percent year on year. In Consumer, credit costs of $1,100,000,000 were flat as higher net charge offs were offset by net reserve releases. And in Wholesale, credit performance remains favorable with the net charge off rate of 8 basis points, which was fully reserved for in prior quarters. Once again, we do not see any signs of broad based deterioration across our portfolios, both consumer and wholesale. Now on to balance sheet and capital on Page 3.
We ended the 2nd quarter with a CET1 ratio of 12.2%, up more than 10 basis points versus last quarter. In the quarter, the firm distributed $7,500,000,000 of capital to shareholders. And as you know, the Fed did not object to our 2019 CCAR capital plan. We are pleased to have significant flexibility with gross repurchase capacity of up to $29,400,000,000 over the next four quarters and the Board announced its intention to increase the common dividend to $0.90 per share effective in the 3rd quarter. Now on Page 4 in Consumer and Community Banking.
CCB generated net income of $4,200,000,000 and an ROE of 1%. Loans were down slightly year on year, driven by home lending down 7%, reflecting the loan sales I just mentioned. However, card loan growth was healthy, up 8%, business banking loans were up 2%, and auto loans and leases were flat. We saw strong deposit and investment growth year on year with deposits up 3% and client investment assets up 16%, growing across both physical and digital channels. Card sales were up 11% as growth remained strong across key products.
And across the franchise, active mobile users were up 12% year on year given continued engagement in our new features. For example, customers have opened over 2,000,000 checking and savings accounts digitally, activated over 60,000,000 Chase offers and our enrollment in credit journey now exceeds $18,000,000 Revenue of $13,800,000,000 was up 11%. This increase included 2 notable items that largely offset. First, the current quarter included a negative MSR adjustment in home lending, driven by updates to our model inputs. And in the prior year, as I mentioned, we had a rewards liability adjustment in cards of approximately 330,000,000 dollars Consumer and Business Banking was up 11% on higher deposit NII driven by margin expansion.
Home lending was down 17%, although excluding the MSR adjustment I just mentioned, revenue would have been up 4%, driven by higher net production revenue on better margins and higher volumes, largely offset by lower NII on spread compression and lower balances. In card, merchant services and auto was up 18%. Excluding the previously noted rewards liability adjustment, revenue was up 11%, driven by higher card NII on loan growth and margin expansion and the impact of higher auto lease volumes. Expenses of $7,200,000,000 were up 4%, driven by continued investments in the business and higher auto lease depreciation, largely offset by efficiencies and lower FDIC charges. Of note, the overhead ratio was 52% and we delivered significant positive operating leverage.
On credit, this quarter included a reserve release in the home lending purchase credit impaired portfolio of $400,000,000 reflecting improvements in delinquencies and home prices, which was partially offset by a reserve build in card of $200,000,000 This was primarily driven by growth and to a lesser extent mix as the newer vintages naturally season and become a larger part of the portfolio. Net charge offs were up $212,000,000 Excluding the recovery on a loan sale and home lending in the prior year, net charge offs were up $80,000,000 driven by card as we continue to grow the portfolio. Now turning to the Corporate and Investment Bank on Page 5. CIB reported net income of $2,900,000,000 and an ROE of 14% on revenue of $9,600,000,000 As a reminder, our performance was particularly strong last year, which featured record or near record revenues in overall IB fees and equity markets. With that in mind, for the quarter, IV revenue of $1,800,000,000 was down 9% year on year in a market that was also down.
Advisory, debt underwriting and equity underwriting fees were down 16%, 13% and 11% respectively, reflecting lower levels of deal activity as well as a 10 year record share in equity underwriting in the prior year. It's worth noting on a year to date basis, we continue to rank number 1 overall and have gained share across all products and regions, benefiting from our continued investments in bankers. In advisory, we grew share and announced deal volumes and announced more deals than any other bank. In debt underwriting, we also ranked number 1 benefiting from our strong lead led positions in leveraged finance. And in equity underwriting, we have seen significant pickup in activity since the Q1 and we continue to benefit from our leadership positions in tech and healthcare where there has been robust activity.
Looking forward, the overall IV pipeline is healthy, though lower compared to the elevated activity we saw last year and with fewer acquisition financing and refinancing opportunities in debt underwriting. Dialogue with clients remains active and we expect strong deal flow to continue. Moving to markets, total revenue was $5,400,000,000 which was flat year on year. Our results include a notable gain in fixed income from the IPO of Tradeweb. Excluding this gain, markets revenue would have been down 6% year on year against a strong second quarter performance last year.
Fixed income markets was down 3% on an adjusted basis with relative weakness in EMEA, partially offset by increased client activity in North America rates and agency mortgage trading due to the changing rate environment. Equity markets was down 12% against a record Q2 last year. The view of client activity and a tough compare contributed to a year on year decline in equity derivatives. That said, cash and prime remained stable with client balances and prime reaching an all time high. Treasury Services and Security Services revenues were $1,100,000,000 $1,000,000,000 down 4% and 5% year on year respectively, with organic growth being more than offset by deposit margin compression.
As a reminder, similar to last quarter, deposit margin was primarily impacted by funding basis compression rather than client betas, and at the firm wide level there is an offset. Sequentially, treasury services was flat and security services was up 3% on higher balances and fees. Finally, expenses of $5,500,000,000 were up 2% compared to the prior year with higher legal expenses partially offset by lower performance based compensation expense. And the comps to revenue ratio for the quarter was 28%. Now moving on to Commercial Banking on Page 6.
Commercial Banking reported net income of $1,000,000,000 and an ROE of 17%. Revenue of $2,200,000,000 was down 5% year on year, predominantly driven by lower investment banking activity due to our outperformance last year and lower NII on slightly lower deposit balances. Also worth noting here, gross IB revenue of $1,400,000,000 was up 8% year to date on strong syndicated lending and M and A advisory activity, and we continue to aggressively toward our long term $3,000,000,000 target. Deposit balances were down 1% year on year and importantly up 1% sequentially as balances have largely stabilized in total, although we continue to see migration from non interest to interest bearing deposits. Expenses of $864,000,000 were up 2% year on year, driven by ongoing investments in banker coverage and technology.
Loans were up 1% with C and I loans being flat or up 3% for the continued runoff in our tax exempt portfolio. The story here remains unchanged. We saw solid growth in areas where we've been investing, including expansion markets in specialized industries, offset by lower acquisition related and short term financing activity. CRE loans were up 2% with modestly higher activity in commercial term lending where clients are taking advantage of lower long term rates, offset by declines in real estate banking, where we continue to be selective given where we are in the cycle. Finally, credit costs were $29,000,000 with a net charge off rate of 3 basis points.
Now on to Asset and Wealth Management on Page 7. Asset and Wealth Management reported net income of $719,000,000 with pre tax margin and ROE of 27%. Revenue of $3,600,000,000 for the quarter was flat year on year as the impact of higher average market levers was offset by lower investment valuation gains. Expenses of $2,600,000,000 were up 1% year on year as continued investments in advisors and technology were partially offset by lower distribution fees. For the quarter, we saw record net long term inflows of $36,000,000,000 driven by fixed income and we had net liquidity inflows of 4,000,000,000 dollars AUM of $2,200,000,000,000 and overall client assets of $3,000,000,000,000 both records were up 7%, driven by cumulative net inflows into long term and liquidity products as well as higher market levels globally.
Deposits were up 2% sequentially and up 1% year on year and similar to the commercial bank, balances in total have largely stabilized. Finally, we had record loan balances, up 7% with strength in both wholesale and mortgage lending. Now on to corporate on Page 8. Corporate reported net income of $828,000,000 including the vast majority of the tax benefit that I mentioned earlier. Revenue was $322,000,000 up $242,000,000 year on year due to higher net income driven by higher rates and balance sheet mix, partially offset by net losses on legacy private equity investments versus net gains in the prior year.
And expenses of $232,000,000 were down $47,000,000 year on year. Finally, turning to Page 9 and the outlook. On this page, I'll just comment on NII, which should not be surprising given the changes to the rate environment. As you can see, we are updating our 2019 full year NII outlook to about $57,500,000,000 The reduction is based on multiple scenarios, which assume, among other things, lower long end rates and up to 3 rate cuts this year, which is consistent with current market sentiment. And as a reminder, this compares to rate scenario that assumes 0 cuts at the time of first quarter earnings.
So to wrap up, the U. S. Consumer remains healthy, overall credit is in great shape and the earnings power of the company is evident. We delivered strong returns this quarter and the diversification and scale of our business model positions us well to outperform in any environment. Understanding there is some macro uncertainty and potential headwinds from the rate outlook, we still expect to grow the franchise and we'll continue to strategically invest in our businesses in technology, bankers and beyond.
And with that, operator, please open the line for Q and A.
Our first question comes from Jim Mitchell of Buckingham Research.
Hey, good morning. I noticed that card loan growth was particularly strong this quarter. I just want to get a sense of what you feel is driving that uptick? And do
you think how sustainable is it at sort of 8% year over year growth?
Sure. So on card loan growth, we feel very good about what we're seeing there. As we talked about at Investor Day, we have a real opportunity with our existing customers. And we talked about how our existing customers have about $250,000,000,000 of borrowing off us, about $100,000,000,000 of that is squarely within our existing buy box. So you can think of this as highly targeted to high quality existing customers.
And for the first time, we're actually seeing loan growth in card, the majority of it coming from existing customers versus new customers. And so we're really shifting the paradigm there, and we feel great about being able to harvest the opportunity that we talked to you about at Investor Day.
All right. And should we expect, just sort of the you could continue to reduce the mortgage footprint in this rate environment?
So on the mortgage business, I would say it was a good quarter on the back of the rally. And so we did see volumes increase and we saw some margin expansion as well. And so obviously highly rate dependent, but I would say the structural challenges in that business remain unchanged. And so we continue to focus on optimizing the balance sheet across capital and liquidity. And so looking at loan sales and thinking about derisking the portfolio from a servicing perspective.
So good quarter on the back of the rally, but doesn't change the overall structural challenges.
Okay, thanks.
Our next question is from Erika Najarian of Bank of America.
Hi, good morning.
Hi, Erika.
Hi. So I just wanted to go back to what you were saying earlier in that your guide or your guide lower is including up to 3 rate cuts this year, which would suggest to me that your net interest income quite defensive in the face of rate cuts. I guess my first question is, could you give us your primary assumptions for that $500,000,000 swing, particularly on deposit pricing?
Okay, sure. So first off, I'll take you back to the Q1 where our guidance was $58,000,000,000 plus and we talked about some pressure on the long end at that point. That pressure has persisted and in fact increased. And so we pulled the impact of the long end through in terms of our outlook. And then on the short end, the range of outcomes are obviously quite broad.
And so we thought about a range of outcomes of 1 to 3 rate cuts. And so you can think about if it's one cut, dollars 57,500,000,000 plus and if it's more, dollars 57,500,000,000 dollars minus. And then based on current in size, you can think about the Q3 as being 100,000,000 to 150,000,000 dollars below the Q2 and then a bit more than that in the Q4 given we would have a full quarter at that point. And then in terms of on betas, I mean, largely speaking, you can think of betas as being symmetric. And so on the consumer side, we saw little reprice on the way up.
And so there is not a lot of opportunity on the way down. On the wholesale side, if you look at large institutional businesses like Treasury Services and security services, we are largely at full reprice there. And so there should be opportunities there. And then in places like the Commercial Bank and Asset and Wealth Management, we are still ahead of what the model would have assumed, but we have started to see reprice pickup there. But importantly, I would say, we're not going to lose any valuable customer relationships over a few ticks of beta.
And we'll see how it goes.
That's all embedded in your assumption.
And it's all embedded in
Got it. And just going back to Jim's question, I noticed that investment securities balances continue to go up and mortgage loans were down another 5%. Should we think about this as part of the overall you were saying optimizing capital and liquidity? And therefore, as we think about it going forward, we could also expect to see perhaps some relief in RWA growth and some relief in the continued reserve release as part of the optimization?
Sure. So on the RWA side, yes, that is precisely why we're doing it. And so when you see the loan sales in home lending, yes, they offset in securities purchases, which are more efficient from a capital perspective as well as a liquidity perspective. So yes, having said that, on reserves, I mean reserves are not necessarily going to be impacted directly by that because of course that will depend upon the environment and the mix of the portfolio that remains.
And I would just say that our standardized capital ratio is the 12.2, advance is 13, advance is obviously a far more important development economic number. It simply does not make sense to own mortgages when you're constrained by standardized and you can't securitize.
Got it. Thank you.
Our next question comes from Mike Mayo of Wells Fargo.
Hi. So the efficiency ratio went from 56% to 55% year over year. And I guess that's with some accelerated tech spending. So do you plan to keep this pace of tech spending going? And what's the current update on that tech spending?
Where is it connecting? Where is it not connecting? Because I think you said you'd accelerate it for a couple of years and then maybe we'd see more results in 2020, 2021?
So can I just take that one? So it's about $11,500,000,000 today. I think it was a little bit lower last year. If we had to stay with it today for next year, it would be something like $11,500,000,000 And I think it's becoming always becoming more efficient. We really have in tech is something that's becoming cheaper all the time.
And then you're also investing money all the time, which we're going to do regardless of the environment. So we're not going to cut things we're trying to build like my reward programs and chase my loan and the credit journey because there's a recession or something like that. So Daniel Gordon will tell you right now that they think they can get more efficient spend and that we shouldn't be spending whatever we want, but we will we have to spend to win in this business and we're very efficient, we can very question about how we spend our technology. We're going to do it regardless of the environment and we'll try to get more efficient in tech spend too.
That's right. And our investments in technology create capacity in terms of productivity to continue to invest in. And we've talked a lot about AI and machine learning. It's early innings there and there's a lot that we're going to be able to do to invest there and become more productive and then cloud, developers can become more productive using the cloud.
It's amazing. Our fraud costs with all the things going on in the world today are down because of effectively because of AI and big data and stuff like that. And it's so hard to complete that when you invest, you look at our client investment, it has to do 16%, a portion of that was you invest. And obviously, you invest cost 1000000 of dollars to build. So you got to put all these things in perspective about how you're going to make the decision going forward.
And then follow-up, Jamie, you mentioned the environment, all the things taking place in the world. How is the environment now? I mean, on the one hand you have trade war, you have lower interest rates, you have capital markets which are down for the big banks, you have a lot of pessimism. On the other hand, you highlighted your results. What's Yes.
I look at When you take the temperature of the environment, what's the temperature?
It's not that bad. Uncertainty is a constant. The one thing in life is you're noticing the uncertainty going forward. And geopolitical tension is kind of a constant. Those things may be a little bit higher now than normal.
But I think we see this global growth is north 3%. You kind of expect the United States to be 2.5% this year. The consumer in the United States is doing fine. Business sentiment is a little bit worse, mostly probably driven by the trade war. And when you travel around the world, Japan is growing and Europe is growing a little bit and Brazil has gone up from negative 4 to 0.
A lot of countries have opportunity to expand. They're not doing great, but they should be doing better at Mexico and Turkey. So I wouldn't get too pessimistic yet. And obviously, the Fed will react to what the data they say. And obviously, it's more important what's going on than just what the Fed does.
If it's cutting rates, we're going to recession. That's not a good rate cut. If the Fed actually raises rates one day because they're booming, that's not so bad.
All right. Thank you.
Our next question comes from Glenn Schorr of Evercore ISI.
Hi, thanks. I'm not sure if I missed it, but I think total average loans were up 2% year on year, but that was impacted by the loan sales. Can you tell us either size of loan sales or what average loan growth was up year on year without that?
So, yes, there's a few things going on in loan growth, as you say, Glenn. So we have the loan sales. We also have the runoff of the tax exempt portfolio. So you can think about loan growth probably closer to 4% if you adjust for those items. And importantly, as we always say, loan growth is an outcome, not an input.
And we feel good about the loan growth that we're seeing in terms of the areas where we're investing. And then for the full year, you can think about a number if you adjust for the loan sales and ex CIB of 2% to 3% full year.
Okay. Appreciate that. And then just curious on the non interest bearing deposits only being down 2% year on year. We've seen a lot bigger numbers at some peers. Is that just strength of JPMorgan franchise or are you doing anything actively to manage that lack of mix shift?
So as I said, we are seeing balances stabilize in the commercial bank and AWM. We are still seeing some migration from non interest bearing to interest bearing, but largely we're seeing those balances stabilize. And then we do, of course, have continued growth in the consumer bank. And the Q2 is typically seasonally high in the consumer bank. So we have some growth in non interest bearing there.
And even in the consumer bank where we've seen growth decelerate, that's largely as a result of consumer spending. So that feels healthy as well.
Okay. Maybe last one on appreciate the guide on 2019. Because it's a half, if you look forward into 2020 with no incremental rate cuts, is it remotely linear? In other words, if we think about if the ongoing rate and curve environment persists into next year after the 2 or 3 cuts this year, are we looking at $1,000,000,000 or is it way too complex to oversimplify like that?
Yes, it's probably more complicated, Glenn. And so just given the range of outcomes are as broad as they are and importantly, if we're looking at cuts that are insurance cuts that sustain the expansion versus cuts that may be in response to a broader economic slowdown, there are other things that we would be talking about. So we're not going to give further guidance on 2020 until we know more.
Okey dokey. Thank you. Appreciate it.
Our next question is from Gerard Cassidy of RBC.
Thank you. Good
morning. When you take a
look at your merchant services business, you had some really strong growth year over year. I think it was up 12% and then your card volumes excluding the commercial card were also up very strong. Can you share with us what's driving that strong growth, the double digit rate of growth?
I would say that is firing on all cylinders. So it's brand, it's people, it's products. It does certainly help to have the backdrop of a healthy U. S. Consumer as well.
And in fact, retail sales this morning looked strong. So we can expect that to continue.
Is it more of the market as you just referenced the retail sales, they were strong. Is it more of that or are you guys also seeing gains in market share that gives you an added boost?
Yes. We have taken share in a little bit of share in card. As you know, we're number 1 in sales there. I think importantly, what's helpful in card is that, we don't even need to take share to grow just given the secular tailwind that we have in the card business on the
Speaking of the future,
can you guys give us some color on what your first read of Liber is that the Facebook announcement about the process payments system that they're going to initiate?
Yes. So just to put it in perspective, Kerry, we've been talking about blockchain for 7 years and very little has happened and you're going to be talking about Libro 3 years from now. So I wouldn't spend too much time on it. We don't mind competition and the request is always been the same. The governments are we won a level playing deal and governments are going to insist that people who hold money or need money, all they're recording the rules where they have the right controls in place.
No one wants to aid the debt terrorism or criminal activities. That's going to be true for everybody involved in this. And I think banks have been doing KYC, BSMO for a long period of time. Those tiers, I think, will just become for everybody at one point, and they should.
Thank you.
Our next question is from John McDonald of Autonomous.
Hi. I wanted to ask about the CCAR and you got a big authorization this year. How did you approach the CCAR plan this year in relation to your long term CET1 target, the 11 to 12 that you
talked about? Sure. So as we think about capital distribution, first, we would start by always saying that we prefer to use our capital to invest and grow our businesses and then to have a competitive and sustainable dividend and only then to return excess capital to our shareholders. And so we are pleased with the approval and the additional capacity to return that 29 point $4,000,000,000 to shareholders. Having said that, we are still targeting the upper end of the 11% to 12% range.
We're always going to want to have a management buffer because as I had said, our first priority will always be to invest and grow our businesses. And then, of course, there remains a lot of uncertainty in terms of the regulatory capital framework. And then importantly, we wouldn't actually need to make that decision for a few more quarters given the way the capital distribution plan is laid out over 4 quarters. But as of now, we are still targeting the upper end of 11% to 12
Okay. Thanks, Jen. And any updated thoughts on CECL? Or could you remind us of what your thoughts on initial impact there? Thanks.
Sure. So it hasn't changed from Investor Day. Our range continues to be $4,000,000,000 to $6,000,000,000 and we're prepared for the January 1 implementation.
Just to take the chance, so CCAR is 1 test a year on stress. We do $120,000,000 a week. And so we are always prepared for stress. CCAR has us losing $20,000,000,000 or $3,000,000,000 over the nine consecutive quarters. I just want to remind you all that in the 9 quarters after Lehman, the real stress event, we made $20,000,000,000 or $30,000,000,000 And CCAR assumes you're going to grow your balance sheet, it assumes you're going to continue your dividend and stuff like that.
We have plenty of capital. I mean, our capital cup run us over and we prefer to deploy that capital. Remember, things like opening branches, for every branch will eventually use $10,000,000 of capital. So Florida branches will eventually be $4,000,000,000 of capital. So restraints on growth, also restraints on capital usage and the ability to enhance the U.
S. Economy. So we're really optimistic about our ability to somehow use our capital, including that intimate acquisition we just did, which I think closes sometime soon.
Our next question is from Betsy Graseck of Morgan Stanley.
Hey, good morning. Jamie, you mentioned about blockchain. We've been hearing about it for 7 years and not much has happened. But I think you at JPM have built a blockchain solution for at least your correspondent banks. And I guess I wanted to understand where you think you're planning on taking that right now.
It's just AML KYC use case, but is that something that you think you could deliver more functionality over time?
So we think the blockchain is real, and the reason it takes so long is you have to people agree to the protocol, write a lot of code to get into it. But the one referring to IAN is think of an information network with banks. So right now, banks transfer live information among each other. Think of trade finance and correspondent banking and stuff like that. So I think we have like 120 banks signed up.
We're going to have 4. So right now, it's for bank wholesale use to have immediate information. They all have the same information. You can move things. But eventually, you'll be able to move money quicker with data.
So yes, we're optimistic about that. And we're going to roll it out as soon as we can and constantly test it and make sure it's secure and all that. I remind people, when it comes to moving money, JPMorgan Chase moved $6,000,000,000,000 a day, quite securely and quite cheaply. So you got to look at the problem you're trying to solve, but people in the journey said, well, they didn't have real time payments. That was true.
And now we do effectively Zelle from P2P and now we do effectively some of the growth, I call RTP real time payments through TCH. So we are building the things that the future is going to want, APIs, blockchain ledgers that have much more data, a real time movement of money that also goes through floor checks, etcetera. So we're quite optimistic about this. It will take a while to get everyone moving it. One day, you will have to be opened up to a broader customer set possibly.
So one of the things that's coming out in these Senate and House Financial Services Banking Committee meetings is this desire for real time payments, a desire for a cheaper solution for payments. And that's supposedly what Libra is going to offer. But to your point, it seems like you're already doing that. The question is, how do we think about the outlook for interchange? And is there what's your strategy towards interchange pricing here as we go over this through the period?
It's an interesting rate. There is real time P2P free, shape and secure called Zelle. So when people say do it, that's already done. That's not cross border. So there are people who might want to do that cross border.
Remember, of course, border remittance are much, much smaller than actual use of debit card, credit card payment systems here. And the bank is in building real time payments, so there's actually already in use. And to me, the issue there is going to be fraud. To make sure in real time payments, you also put through effectively real time fraud checks and stuff like that. So in the United States, credit card, debit card, these are people love these cards.
The beneficiary is the consumer. They always remember that's who we're here to serve. And someone is going to pay eventually for services provided, but people like their credit cards. They use their credit cards more than they use their debit cards. I don't remember the last time I used my debit card.
When you get rewards, it's great. Okay. Thanks.
And JPMorgan, I mean, you're getting more free stuff. You get free you can buy and sell stock for free. We just gave you a very good as it got rolled out. I mean, we have a few accounts, but it's robo investing, very cheap, very clear. So we're going to take and give our clients more and better and faster and cheaper all the time.
And now we package that with Sapphire Banking and Sapphire Card or discounts and mortgages, they're always made to be seen, but the future is very bright because if we can do work for our customers, that's a very good thing.
And don't forget, on credit cards, you get charged back rights and you get the float.
Right. And you get you go on with your Chase customer, you get your FICO score for free, you're going to be able to figure out we're going to tell customers a great financial education, how they can improve their FICO score. Get offers like this Chase sell them to Chase offer our end users. I mean, you don't really market, but it's really taken off.
Sure. So the Chase offers, we talked about that at Investor Day. It's like a really powerful flywheel where we can deliver value to our large merchant clients in terms of being able to bring a very large customer base to them and then we can deliver that value to our customers at 0 cost to us. And so as I said in the presentation, we've had over 60,000,000 Chase offers activated. And so this is really powerful and benefits not just our consumers, but our large merchant clients and at 0 cost.
So that message of more efficient, less cost maybe needs to get hurt on the Hill as well?
Yes. And we talk about the Hill all the time and a lot of people understand that. And of course, they always want you to do a bad job for consumers, which we believe it's been.
Yes. I guess the final question here is just on the underbanked. Is there something or is there an offer that you have for them? Are you considering that? Because that I'm just thinking about where FinTech is trying to exploit you.
And I know it's a catchphrase underbanked that is being used by labor. It doesn't necessarily to me seem like it's solving anything for them, but maybe you've got a better solution that we don't focus on?
So we have some of that, Jim, or Jake, we have I think 25% of our branch are LMI neighborhoods. When we go to those neighborhoods, we do some philanthropy. We're doing more and more financial education, which I think is really important. I just mentioned the FICO score, but think of there might be other things we can do. We do change chats, so get people into the branch to educate them about saving, FICO scores, what you need to do to get a mortgage and buy a house and stuff like that.
And then we have a product, which really is great, called secure banking. And think of it as a card, but it's the full thing. You can't overdraft. I think it's $4.95 a month, but you can use ATMs, you can have direct deposit, you can do online mobile payments and stuff like that. So we think it's a great product for the underbanked.
And I think that's going down 25% and we've kind of pushed that a little bit more. So we always kind of come to base. And then we also have special, what I call, venture banking, the Oscar of Color Fund. We're making loans to Oscar of Color that are not traditional bank loans, but helping you grow your businesses. We're finding a lot of ways to do it.
And we got a lot of folks in Congress understand that I would say we're at the forefront of that. FinTech, of course, always going to try to eat your lunch and that's I think that's good. It's called American capitalism and we have to stay on our toes to compete. But we are like Gemma Zip cards, she rolled out last year and asked to change my plan and change my loan so that people can use their credit balances immediately to do what they want to do and do it well. We rolled out Zelle P2P, that's good for everybody.
So if you have a bank account, you can move money to your friends and relatives that haven't been paid the $10 money changer fees and stuff like that. So we're all in and trying to do a better job for the American consumer. We think we do a great job for them. And with the legitimate complaints, we'll fix it.
That's right. And you mentioned the 25% in the LMI Europe in terms of our branch footprint. In our expansion markets, that's 30%.
Thanks.
Our next question is from Ken Usdin of Jefferies.
Thanks a lot. Good morning. Just wanted to ask on the balance sheet. Last year or so, you've seen a huge jump in the trading related assets. And I know you had the accounting change that you mentioned in the supplement.
But could you talk about, is that related to market share gains? Is it related to just specific strategies with regard to managing liquidity? And how and it doesn't seem to be equally growing on the asset side and the trading liabilities. So just can you explain the dynamics behind that and how that adds to the net interest income story? Thanks.
Sure. So in terms of the balance sheet growth that you saw quarter over quarter, that was primarily related to our balance sheet intensive businesses in the markets businesses. And then we were down on a spot basis quarter over quarter. But we start with deposit growth and so we have had strong deposit growth and so you see that reflected on the balance sheet side as well. And you would have seen security balances up as well.
And some of that is adding duration and some of that is short duration securities that are higher yielding than IOER and yes, so.
Okay. So it is part of the liquidity management strategy. Okay. Jed, did you say what the amount of the gains that you had on the loan sales this quarter?
Just a quick example, if you get a higher return on repo, you get I OER, you're going to do that. If you get a higher return on standardized capital on securities, we are under the holding whole loans, you're going to do that. And that's what we're seeing on some of these things.
That's right. The decrease growth I should have mentioned is the cost of home sales and home lending.
Right. Okay. Got it. That makes sense. And did you say what the can you tell us what the amount of the gains on the loan sales this quarter were if they were above trend?
We haven't disclosed the amount of the gains and we had some loan sales in the 4th quarter, the Q1 and the second quarter. The first and second quarter in terms of the notional amount, the Q1 was about $7,000,000,000 and the second quarter was about $9,000,000,000 So just a little bit more.
We gave you the 2nd quarter net network. They show up in different places, but not
much, not material. Yes.
Got it. And lastly, just any thoughts on the investment banking pipeline and just the continuation of the outlook on across the buckets there? Thanks.
Sure. So in terms of the investment banking pipeline, I'll just remind you that the Q3 is typically a seasonally lower quarter. And so sequentially, function of a a function of a reversion to more normal levels activity as well as some overhang from macro uncertainty. In M and A, still feels very healthy and it's still a space where companies are looking for synergistic opportunities for growth, especially in North America, perhaps Europe a bit more muted. ECM, we had a very strong second quarter, so that will taper off in the second half a bit.
But I would say deals are getting done well in the current environment. And then DCM, DCM will be more subdued, reflecting a slowdown in acquisition financing activity as well as refinancing opportunities, but albeit with a good backdrop for new issuance given the rate environment.
Our next question is from Matt O'Connor of Deutsche Bank.
Good morning. So I realize rate expectations can change quickly, but how do you think about managing the company in a rate environment that follows the curve that's out there for 3 to 4 cuts. And you said earlier, you would have cut back on technology, but are there other areas and expenses you think about managing the balance sheet and liquidity a little bit different?
Sure. So in terms of balance sheet management, we manage the balance sheet in both directions. It's a negatively convex balance sheet. And so all else being equal, as rates are declining, we would naturally drift shorter, driven both by assets and liabilities. So you would expect us to add duration, which we did this quarter.
But we're not going to change the way we run the company because of the rate environment. We're going to continue serving our clients, investing with discipline and managing the balance sheet across all dimensions that being capital, liquidity and duration. And then in terms of expenses, again, we're not going to change the way we run the company because of an interest rate environment. And I'll just say again that the range of outcomes are very broad here. And so if we end up with insurance cuts, it's a temporary headwind.
And if we end up with cuts in response to a broader economic slowdown, there will be a lot more to talk about. But as Jamie always says, we're not going to change the way we run the company because of the macro environment. That said, in a broader slowdown, obviously, decision a large part of our investment portfolio on an annual basis. We will always continue to invest in the things that we think are important, but we would have that opportunity depending upon the opportunity to take a look at that.
Remember, in a real recession, okay, there are always opportunities to reduce your costs as vendors fall all over themselves to give you better deals and stuff like that. There are also huge opportunities to spend your money wisely. So Sapphire card was birthed in 2009. And you could imagine that you say, okay, let's not do this great opportunity, we're not going to take it. And so I think you've got to be very careful, whether it is marketing money, it's usually better spent in a downturn.
The returns on it usually double.
And you talked about the capital and your thought process there. Obviously, the authorization on the buybacks is a very big number. Is it your expectations that you will use at all or is that still to be determined based on balance sheet growth, stock price and the environment?
I would say still to be determined. Our first choice will always be to use our excess capital to invest and grow our business. So still to be determined. And as you know, it's over 4 quarters. And so we have time to think about it, but obviously, please have the flexibility.
Is the timing of that even or is there flexibility there too?
It has been in the past, but we can change it every day.
Our next question is from Saul Martinez of UBS.
Hey, good morning. Couple of questions. First, on the NII outlook beyond this year, and I fully appreciate you're not giving guidance beyond this year. But you do have the guidance from Investor Day out there of a sustainable NII of $58,000,000,000 to $60,000,000,000 that was set in a very, very different rate environment. If we were to see multiple rate cuts, how do we think about that guidance?
And how I mean, what are some of the moving parts that might get you perhaps to the lower end of that $58,000,000,000 to $60,000,000,000 Is it simply dependent on how the economy responds, deposit pricing? If you can just kind of outline what you think some of those moving parts are? Sure.
So the guidance we gave at Investor Day, steady state, 58 to 60, I would say largely still stands. Importantly, because when we talked about that at Investor Day, we weren't assuming any further benefit from rates. So we were assuming that any incremental increases in rates would be offset and reprice. And so the majority of that growth was going to come from balance sheet growth and mix. And if you remember the slide, there were a number of arrows on the slide even at that time, which was obviously a different rate environment.
We were implying that there were a number of different paths to get there. And so that obviously continues to be true. And so there may be a different path to get there. It may take a little bit longer, but we still believe in that steady state number because we still believe in the growth of the franchise.
Okay. Okay, that's helpful. I could change gears
a little
bit. You recently announced that you're closing Fin or you closed Fin, and I think the stated logic is you learned that millennials don't need a separate brand or experience. But can you just elaborate on the logic there and what you learned from that experience? Because it does seem to maybe fly in the face of what some other entities or financial institutions are doing with their digital banking strategy.
Yes, Raj. Go ahead.
I was just going to say, we learned a lot in Fin. You said it, that we learned that importantly the power of the Chase brand certainly means that we don't need a separate brand. We also learned about a number of features that our customers love and we were able to reuse those features and port them over to the Chase mobile app. And so I think we always need to be testing and learning and doing things like this and not afraid to shut them down when we've learned what we needed to learn and can serve our customers through the primary Chase mobile app.
We even know a lot like that how to do digital account openings only digital, because when you do it out of a retail bank, you tend to rely what you already have. So there are a lot of lessons there. We always going to be running some kind of skunk works and learning from things like that. And so we don't look at those kind of things like failures at all. That is how you'll learn.
And Jeff Bezos will tell you, mistakes are good. Mistakes are what make you smarter and better. And so I hope we made some really good mistakes that could teach us all of our business at one point. The people doing Fin did a great job, they're embedded. And by the way, you can open a Chase account now and never go into a branch.
And you can open that kind of when it takes open an account, takes minutes to open an account. So we got much better at digital only, but we got to separate it from the physical branch system.
Yes, the digital account opening is now about 25% of our new account.
And we're doing we'll be doing that small business and merchant processing and all these various things.
Got it. Okay. Thanks very much.
Our next question is from Eric Compton of Morningstar.
Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So this question kind of ties into some of the items already mentioned, longer term kind of tech focus and also related to Fin. So there has been some press recently about reasons for closing down the Fin app. And one of the items that was mentioned was some of the difficulties banks can potentially run into with their legacy platforms, which for the most part are built on COBOL, which has been around since the 60s.
And depending on who you talk to, these legacy platforms can either be like huge problems for banks or not really a big deal. So I guess from the outside, at least for me, it can be kind of hard to tell what really is going on there. So my question is, as you compete with FinTech firms who are building new platforms from scratch, How do you strategically view dealing with your own legacy platforms? Is there a need to kind of redo these things eventually in order to actually compete with newer tech over time? Do these legacy platforms really hamstring you in any way?
Or is the hype around those issues really overdone? And if so, why? Thanks.
The hype has been around now for the better part of a decade, right? And we seem to be doing fine. But it is true and some of these legacy platforms is also the reason why you have 50,000,000 customers. But it is true that over time these platforms being reformulated and refactored to be cloud eligible and things like that. And those things are more efficient.
So your costs will go down, your error rates will go down. So the way I look at it a little bit is we have we run like 6,000 or 7,000 applications. Over time those are being modularized and being refactored to be cloud eligible, which are owned by the cloud, very public cloud, and yet they will be more efficient. But we also have tons of new digital platforms, AI that are built around these things that do the customer service upside that they see. There's open accounts in minutes, you get your free credit journey, we can modify so many things in days weeks as opposed to years because you're not mucking with the whole legacy system.
And so it's a little bit of both. But those numbers are embedded in our tech spend. The refactoring, building data centers, getting better, adding AI, they're always in those numbers.
And we have no further questions at this time.
Thank you very much. Jen, you did a great job. We'll start you all in the quarter. Thanks, everyone, Jean.