Good day, and welcome everyone to the Lockheed Martin Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Results conference call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Greg Gardner, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, John, and good morning. I'd like to welcome everyone to our third quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Joining me today on the call are Jim Taiclet, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ken Possenriede, our Chief Financial Officer. Statements made in today's call that are not historical fact are considered forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of federal securities law. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Please see today's press release and our SEC filings for a description of some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We have posted charts on our website today that we plan to address during the call to supplement our comments. These charts also include information regarding non-GAAP measures that may be used in today's call.
Please access our website at www.lockheedmartin.com and click on the Investor Relations link to view and follow the charts. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Jim.
Thanks, Greg. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today on our third quarter 2020 earnings call as we review our financial and operational results, highlight some of our key accomplishments, and discuss our updated outlook for 2020 and trend information for 2021. I do hope this call finds you and your family safe and healthy. The coronavirus outbreak remains an ongoing global pandemic, and we're all working to mitigate its impacts. Our priorities at Lockheed Martin remain ensuring the health and welfare of our employees and their families, continuing to perform and deliver for our customers and our national security, and using our resources and leadership as a company to assist our communities, our country, and our allies.
We are continuing to take actions to address issues brought on by this virus, maintaining robust health and safety protocols in the workplace, delivering personal protective equipment to frontline workers, and donating over $20 million to COVID-19 charities. We have continued expediting payments to our supply chain and have hired over 12,000 employees since the pandemic began. I thank all of the men and women of Lockheed Martin for their dedication and commitment during these trying times as they perform with excellence for our customers and their important missions. I'd also like to take a moment to express my sincere sympathies to those across our nation affected by the recent hurricane and wildfire disasters. We hope that our employees and other citizens of the affected communities recover quickly from the devastation caused by these events.
Moving to Lockheed Martin's results, as our press release illustrates, we delivered another strong quarter across the board, financially, strategically, and operationally. Ken will discuss our financial results in more detail and provide preliminary trending data for 2021, but I'd like to begin by providing a few financial highlights from the quarter. Sales this quarter were a record and exceeded last year's third quarter by 9%. Year to date, we are 10% over our 2019 results. Our business areas grew segment profit by 6% over the 2019 third quarter, and year to date, we're 7% over 2019. We had a strong quarter of cash generation, achieving $1.9 billion of cash from operations. We now have brought in nearly $6.4 billion of operating cash year to date, keeping us on pace to deliver at least $8 billion in cash from operations in 2020.
We won approximately $17 billion in orders, resulting in another high watermark for our backlog and our ninth consecutive quarter of backlog growth. In cash deployment actions during the quarter, our board of directors approved a dividend increase of over 8% to $2.60 per share and $10.40 annually. Providing outstanding returns to shareholders through a strong dividend remains our cash deployment priority, and this action marks the 19th consecutive year that we have increased our quarterly dividend. Our outstanding year-to-date results and record backlog enabled us to again increase our full year 2020 outlook for sales, operating profit, and earnings per share. Our team continues to deliver exceptional performance and operating results with a portfolio that is well aligned to our customers' priorities.
Turning briefly to budgets, you'll recall that the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 was enacted into law last year and established spending levels for discretionary defense budgets, with a total FY 2021 national defense spending target of approximately $740 billion. Lawmakers continue to work on authorization and appropriations bills. In the interim, the federal government is operating under a continuing resolution for FY 2021 through December 11th. While we do not expect impacts to our 2020 financials should the continuing resolution be extended beyond December 11th, 2020, we could experience some level of impact to our 2021 trending data, depending on the duration of the CR. Similarly, Section 3610 of the CARES Act, which was passed in March to provide authorization for federal contractors, continue to support government initiatives despite COVID-19 disruption, was also extended through December 11th.
To date, no additional funding has been provided for issues introduced by the coronavirus. As with the DoD Appropriations bill, we do not anticipate a material impact to our 2020 financial results should a delay in CARES Act funding continue, and we remain engaged in discussions with the Defense Department regarding a macro settlement for issues caused by the virus. Turning to our portfolio, I'd like to highlight a few of our notable strategic achievements that demonstrate the solid demand for our signature platforms and their relevancy to next-generation warfighting capabilities. In our aeronautics business area, the Department of Defense announced a foreign military sale for a total of 90 new F-16 fighter aircraft to the countries of Taiwan and Morocco. Aero received an award of nearly $5 billion, adding to recent orders from Bahrain, Slovakia, and Bulgaria, and bringing the F-16 backlog to nearly 130 jets.
This 90-airplane award is part of a new $62 billion indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract vehicle put in place to facilitate F-16 FMS sales to international customers, taking advantage of standardized contracting to expedite the process for future awards. I can tell you, I flew a Block 70 last year, and it is an awesome airplane. Our Space business area was awarded a new contract that represents an opportunity to bring together an array of high-tech platforms into one cohesive network that spans every domain for unmatched situational awareness, powered with 5G technology. Last month, the Space Development Agency awarded our team one of two contracts for approximately $200 million to develop initial data transport capabilities for the first generation of the National Defense Space Architecture.
The award represents an important step toward building an interoperable, connected, and secure mesh network of satellites that links ground, sea, and air capabilities to sensors in space. The Space Transport Layer contract initiates the design and development of the system, the launch of a constellation of 10 small low Earth-orbiting satellites. This network will be capable of sending and receiving secure wideband data directly to the warfighter and to weapon systems. This interoperability and interservice networking will communicate and analyze data seamlessly to enable a force multiplier that's flexible and formidable. That those in battle can effectively perform joint all-domain operations. Future sensors, data collectors, and communication payloads can be incrementally added to this constellation to create a web that will link the most time-critical intelligence and tracking data.
We are very pleased to be part of this opportunity and look forward to the launch of the satellites and the demonstration of the initial mesh network in just two years. In our Missiles and Fire Control group, our integrated air and missile defense team achieved two important mission success events. These demonstrated our commitment to innovation and a network-centric focus at Lockheed Martin. Most recently, we successfully conducted a test at White Sands, just after the close of the quarter, where a PAC-3 MSE missile intercepted an incoming target using location data provided by the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense network, or THAAD weapon system. This demonstrated a critical capability to expand the defended area through integration of existing systems.
In July, the U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, and Lockheed Martin together demonstrated the ability to integrate F-35 intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance track data with the U.S. Army's Integrated Battle Command System during an Orange Flag evaluation near Edwards Air Force Base, California. This evaluation just demonstrated the value of utilizing data from the F-35 to enable enhanced integrated air and missile defense, such as PAC-3 engagements. This accomplishment is one of the first instances of demonstrating our 5G.MIL concept with the F-35's compute and data storage capabilities, enabling that F-35 to serve as an edge node of a network-centric operational architecture. This concept and the ability to share data across platforms is another example of our commitment to adopting a joint all-domain operations mindset to maximize the collective value and power of our customers' highly capable assets and our platforms.
Networking every sensor with every shooter across the services and across domains will provide real-time data to maximize the effectiveness of our total force. These few strategic highlights represent just a few of how we will pursue a strategy to help our customers meet emerging threats with 21st-century capabilities, as well as create a powerful deterrent to future military conflicts. We continue to engage industry as well as technology leaders from the commercial sector to explore collaboration and align technology roadmaps for transformational solutions for our men and women in uniform. With that, I'll turn it over to Ken.
Hey, thanks, Jim, and good morning, everyone. As I highlight our key financial accomplishments, please follow along with the web charts that we included with our earnings release today. Let's begin with chart three and an overview of our results for the quarter. Sales, segment operating profit, cash from operations, and earnings per share remain strong. As Jim noted, we achieved record sales in the quarter. We generated $1.9 billion of cash from operations, and we continued our cash deployment actions in the quarter, returning $757 million of cash to our shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases. In addition to these results, we again increased our backlog to $150.4 billion, representing the ninth consecutive quarter of record backlog. Based on the strength of our performance to date, we have updated our financial outlook for 2020 and are also providing our 2021 preliminary financial trends.
Turning to Chart 4, we compare our sales and segment operating profit in the third quarter of this year with last year's results. Sales grew 9% compared with last year, to a record $16.5 billion, continuing the strength we had in the first two quarters, while segment operating profit increased 6% over last year's level to nearly $1.8 billion. On Chart 5, we'll discuss our earnings per share in the quarter. Our EPS from continuing operations was $6.25, an increase of $0.59 or 10% higher than last year, driven by a $100 million increase in segment operating profit and additional FAS/CAS income, partially offset by an increase in the effective tax rate. On Chart 6, we review our year-to-date cash from operations. Through three quarters, our cash from operations is $6.4 billion, a 10% increase over the same point in 2019.
This performance does include $1.4 billion of CARES Act benefits, which were more than offset by $1.8 billion of accelerated payments to our suppliers. Moving on to Chart 7, we provide our revised outlook for 2020. With just one quarter left in the year, we are now providing point estimates of results for the entire year versus the ranges we have provided in previous quarters. We expect sales to be approximately $65.3 billion for the year. That's above the high end of the guidance range we provided last quarter. At $7.1 billion, our forecasted segment operating profit is also above the high end of the guidance range last quarter, maintaining a 10.9% margin. This puts our sales approximately 9% above our 2019 results and segment operating profit approximately 8% last year. Our FAS/CAS pension adjustment remains unchanged at a little less than $2.1 billion.
Earnings per share is expected to be approximately $24.45, above the high end of our previous guidance range, driven by additional sales volume and the continued performance across our business. Cash from operations remains at greater than or equal to $8 billion, which assumes no contributions to our pension trust in 2020. Chart 8 shows our new outlook for sales by business area for the year. In total, our point estimate for sales outlook is approximately $1 billion above the midpoint of our last guidance, and that's driven primarily by Aeronautics. On Chart 9, we provide a similar view of our new outlook for segment operating profit by business area for the year. Like our sales, segment operating profit is $150 million above the midpoint of the guidance range from last quarter, and that's driven primarily by Aeronautics and RMS.
On Chart 10, we provide a preliminary look at our 2021 trends. As we look ahead, we expect our 2021 sales to be greater than or equal to $67 billion, a 3% increase over our current outlook for 2020. We expect our segment operating margin will be between 10.9% and 11.1%, showing continued strong performance on our legacy programs in all business areas. Now, as you recall from last quarter, we expected 2021 cash to be at least $7.8 billion, including a $1 billion contribution to our pension trust. We are now pleased to increase that estimate by $300 million- $8.1 billion, still including the same $1 billion pension payment. We also plan at least $1 billion in share repurchases, the same level as we anticipate in 2020, and that's more than offsetting any expected share issuances in the year.
Additionally, we have a debt maturity coming due next year of $500 million. Moving to our FAS/CAS outlook, we expect our net 2021 FAS/CAS adjustment will be approximately $2.1 billion, and that's similar to the adjustment for 2020. This estimate assumes a discount rate at the end of the year of 2.5%, or 75 basis points below the 2019 rate. Based on our performance to date, we are assuming a 7% return on our assets for 2020, and we are maintaining that same rate of 7% per year for our long-term asset return assumption. Finally, on Chart 11, we have our summary. We have seen growth and strong performance from all our business areas this year, with increased backlog and sustained cash generation throughout the year.
Our updated 2020 financial metrics anticipate strong full-year results, and we expect to see continued operational performance and increased cash flows in 2021. Based on our portfolio of legacy programs, new wins, and strategic investments in key growth areas, we have continued to grow our backlog, deliver value to our customers, and return cash to our stockholders. With that, we're ready for your questions. John?
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we are opening our lines for questions. Please press one zero to enter the queue. To remove yourself from the queue, please press one zero again. In the interest of time, we are limiting you to one question. Please return to the queue for any follow-up questions. Just as a quick reminder, if you have a question, please press one zero. First to the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Thanks so much, good morning, Jim and Ken.
Good morning.
Revenues have grown 30% since 2017, and if we exclude the F-35, volumes are up 17%, so high single-digit growth per year. What programs or product areas do you think decelerate the most in your view from these high single-digit levels to 3% implied trend line for 2021? Is this something of a new normal we should be thinking about, or do we transition from platform programs to less quantifiable opportunities that could reshape the growth curve? Thank you.
Thanks, Sheila. I'll tell you what, I'll kick it off, and then I'll ask Jim if he's got some color at the end. It's probably best we start with how we got to this trend data. If you think of our planning process over the last couple of months, we've been going through our long-range plan, working with our business areas, then working with the corporation on assumptions regarding tax or pension assumptions, et cetera. We then review that with our board, it's primarily a reaffirmation of our 2020 numbers, then of the long-range plan for 2021 through 2023. Do that in the late September time period. The quarter closes. We then do an assessment to come up with what we think our trend data will be.
I'll just remind everybody, and we said it in our prepared comments, Jim and I, we did take our guidance up $1 billion for 2020. If I could go around the horn, I'll do sales, go around the horn, and then I'll give you my perspective on some opportunities out there and then hand it over to Jim. We start with Aero, and we look at 2021. Right now, we're seeing low single-digit growth year-over-year for the portfolio. Specifically, if you talk about F-35, we're seeing growth similar to the overall Aero growth of low single digits. Right now, we see production and development flat, and we see primarily the growth coming from sustainment as our fleet expands. On F-16, we see solid growth as the program continues to ramp up production activities and also the modernization programs that we have going on for F-16.
Air mobility sales surprisingly are flattish. We've been talking about a slight decline, but they are stable going into 2021. Finally, for Aeronautics, we do anticipate seeing strong double-digit growth at our Skunk Works. Our classified advanced development programs, we continue to execute on those recent awards. If I move on to Missiles and Fire Control, we're seeing low single-digit growth there as well. That's after several years of very strong growth as we approach production capacity on some major missile programs. Think of HELLFIRE and GMLRS. We're still seeing very strong demand there. Just year-over-year, we see it being more flattish than not. Our growth is being led by our production programs. Think PAC-3, which will be up double digits. Precision fires will be up mid-single digits. JASSM/LRASM will be up double digits.
That's partially offsetting some of the growth in our THAAD programs. That's just due to some procurement cost timing on a multi-year award. If I could move to RMS, we also anticipate low single-digit growth there as well, at least for now. At Sikorsky, we're seeing low single-digit growth. That's a reflection of the mix across our production programs as life cycles change. Think of the Combat Rescue Helicopter program and CH-53K. We'll see double-digit growth there as these programs ramp up into production. That's partially offset the growth at VH-92 as it ramps down in lower volumes on our Canadian military helicopter program. The same with Black Hawk . Even though it's a strong contributor in the top line year-over-year, we'll see a modest decline. Within IWSS, we'll see a slight decline from 2021.
Our Aegis franchise, however, will see high single-digit growth. That's driven by international opportunities. We're still seeing international opportunities there. Offsetting that growth, we're seeing reductions within our radar business as the TPQ-53 declines while we await the next-gen programs. Think of Sentinel and TPY-X beyond 2021. We're also seeing lower volume on our Littoral Combat Ship program in 2021. Nice surprise in RMS is our training solutions. We're going to see solid double-digit growth there, driven by digital percentage of POC events in 2021 on an international pilot training program. Finally, space. Right now, we see it as our highest growth business area, mid-single-digit range. Think of that as the strategic missile defense portfolio is expected to be up double digits.
That's mainly driven by hypersonics programs and also the anticipated Next-Generation Interceptor award. That's partially offset by the growth in reductions on our legacy mil space programs, predominantly think SBIRS, Advanced EHF, and GPS. They're all down mid-single digits due to program life cycle. We'll go into January. We'll spend the next three months going through the second phase of our plan. A couple of things before we give guidance. We'll see how we ended 2020, how we finish the year. We'll reassess our orders plan for 2021 and adjust that accordingly, and its impact that it has on our 2021 top-line growth for sales. We'll look at our backlog and look at the assumptions that our business areas are making of conversions to sales in 2021.
Before I turn the call over to Jim, just some orders opportunities that are out there. We still see continued need and demand for additional capabilities on F-35 that ultimately down the road, maybe not in 2021, but we'll see some growth there in the future. There are certainly other countries that have a keen interest in the F-35 from a product standpoint, so we'll see demand there. F-16, Jim mentioned the IDIQ contract we received. The first two countries are part of that IDIQ. We see many opportunities out there for F-16, and the same with C-130. Then in the classified area of aeronautics, there are a multitude of opportunities out there. In missiles and fire control, we have TLVS. That's a future air and missile defense program for Germany. There's upside there for us. CH-53K and RMS for international.
Of course, we've always talked about the future of vertical lift. In space, there's classified space. Most of these are platform programs, Sheila. There are others. We're looking to focus on our mission systems. Jim talked about the 5G work and the interconnectivity of our products solution for our customer, and I'll let him give some more color on that if he has it.
Sure. Ken, that was a great summary of some of the detailed line items that go into 2021. Sheila, I would just add and extend from what Ken said on some themes for growth over the next, not only the next year, but the next number of years. The way I'm looking at it is that, as Ken said, there's high demand for our signature products already, both domestic and international, whether it's F-35, F-16, CH-53K, et cetera. We are going to drive some mission systems content into those as we move forward, and technology insertion and upgrades as was mentioned briefly. Those are some really big themes. We don't know exactly what customer and what order and what version they're going to be seeking and at what quarter. I assure you, these themes are going to continue.
The next theme I would offer is there's some new technology ramps to production that Ken alluded to. When we speak of hypersonics, I think there's a very big upside there because there's a very big threat that's getting worse out of Russia and China, and the U.S. and its allies are going to have to meet it both on offensive and defensive hypersonic systems which I believe we're the leader here. The classified space arena is really a wide-open field. Our space business is, again, the clear leader in this area, and we're putting out some really fantastic products, I think, that are unmatched in our industry. Then there's Future Vertical Lift, as Ken said. Keep that in mind because as we go to network-centric operations, which I just alluded to a couple of examples that we've already implemented.
As we go to that network-centric approach more widely, it's really going to strengthen our platform positions of those signature platforms. Think of Aegis, F-35, Future Vertical Lift, whether it's DEFIANT or not. Those are going to be the edge compute nodes of the future and the processing systems that act as the core network to tie it all together. Our platforms are extremely well-positioned to actually implement the sort of 5G.MIL theory that we have that we're pursuing. Then there's going to be new revenue streams, I think, as a result of 5G.MIL and our kind of 21st Century Warfighter concept. Those could be inclusive of networking as a service, more of a subscription model that we do on behalf of our customers.
We do the upgrades and the comm layer and make sure we tie it all together just like you experience on your cell phone subscription. You don't know all the pieces that go into it. Every morning when you turn it on, it works, and it works with the latest applications, and it works with the latest technology. Those are the kinds of things we're going to explore. It'll take a little bit longer to get there, but we're positioning ourselves to do that as well.
Our next question's from Myles Walton with UBS. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning.
Morning.
First one is just a clarification for Ken, your remarks on backlog. You mentioned some of the opportunities, but I didn't hear if you thought it would end the year flat up or down. Jim, if we take everything that Ken laid out from a cash and capital deployment respect to the $1 billion share repurchase and then debt retirements about $1 billion a year, you'll have maybe $6 billion at this time next year in a business that requires $1.5 billion-$2 billion on hand. It's going to continue to raise the question of how you're progressing, looking at potential opportunities, particularly in the M&A arena. Hoping you can give some perspective there as you've looked a little bit deeper from your time. Thanks.
Hey, Myles. Good morning. First question on the backlog. We are right now planning on growing our backlog in the fourth quarter. There is one binary event that has to happen, and that is the closure on Lot 15 production. We're in the midst of negotiations with the customer right now. I think there's agreement on both sides to try to get this done by year-end, but if it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen, and it rolls into next year. If it does happen, we will continue the growth in the fourth quarter of backlog increase.
Myles, to speak to M&A approaches, I think we actually have to take two levels up and speak first to the strategy for the company. The executive team and I and the board agree on what we call our 21st Century Warfighter concept, which has four pillars to the strategy, and I'll go through them really briefly. First of all, it's lead. We want to lead the acceleration of 21st century technologies into the national defense space, not just by doing it ourselves, but by teaming with commercial industry and things like AI and 5G, edge computing, autonomy, additive manufacturing, et cetera. We're planning to lead that acceleration into 21st century technologies. We're going to innovate as the second pillar internally along with that.
We're going to innovate in both the realms of science, such as directed energy, hypersonics I mentioned earlier, as well as in this networking innovation, and to bring capabilities to our platforms and, frankly, ultimately our competitors' platforms, to be able to make them all more effective on behalf of our customer. The third pillar of all of this is driving operational excellence, that's really about, while doing all this, increasing Lockheed Martin's margins and ROI while reducing the total life cycle cost for our customers because for them to afford what they need to do in the future, our industry actually has to get more efficient at the same time. Lastly, this is where we get into more of capital allocation. We believe in this business, and we're seeking to invest in it for growth.
Growth of our asset base and our capabilities is sort of the fourth pillar, and that's going to provide solutions to our customers that they're going to need in the future that we can't necessarily deliver today. When we take those four pillars and say, "Okay, well, what are we going to do with capital allocation and all that cash that this really fantastic business is generating," as you said, it's really, first of all, to support our strong dividend. We're going to continue to do that. Secondly, we're going to keep investing in organic capital expenditures to build capacity to deliver on our core business. Much of what we spent this year is on classified programs in both the aeronautics and space that are growing relatively rapidly, and so we're going to continue to do those organic investments every time we can.
Thirdly, alongside those CapEx investments, we're going to invest in R&D to sustain our technological leadership, and again, both in traditional or defense-centric areas such as hypersonics and also as more commercially introduced areas such as networking. Those are the first three. It's a dividend, CapEx, and R&D. We're also going to seek acquisition and joint venture opportunities to deepen our capabilities in things like mission systems, as Ken said, and to add technological firepower to our existing company. For example, we just bought a business called i3 that gives us a novel capability in thermal management for hypersonic glide bodies, which is something we wanted to bring in-house and, again, accelerate our own potential for developing that piece of the technology that's so absolutely critical.
We're going to be looking for opportunities in the M&A space and the joint venture space, and even partnerships that are commercial to thicken our portfolio and also to bring in the technologies faster into the company that we think are going to be crucial for the future. We plan to be active, but we also plan to be very prudent. In my last business experience, we were fairly active on the M&A front, but we turned down actually quite a few more opportunities than we went through with. We'll continue to have that discipline here at Lockheed Martin, but we do want to invest in this company and grow and use our cash flow to do that when we can.
Our next question's from Rich Safran with Seaport Global Securities. Please go ahead.
Jim, Ken, Greg, good morning.
Morning.
A space question with about three parts. Margins at space were a bit weaker than I thought, and I'm guessing there was an issue there at ULA, so I thought you might discuss that. Next, we're talking about 2021. I thought you might discuss the competitive dynamics in the space business. Does SpaceX represent a challenge to your plans? Given the remarks you just made, do you think contested space is a growth area next year? Finally here, Jim, I thought you might expand on the opening remarks about the new satellite constellation, and if it's applicable, discuss generally the long-term space opportunity set here, and if the 21st Century Warfighter program you just mentioned is involved.
Okay. Hey, Rich. That sounded like a four-part question to me, but I'm not good at math. Yeah.
Margin
The margin reduction on Space, it's based on a couple things. One, we had one less event on ULA. There was a slip in one of the launches, so that was the main driver. You also had lower risk retirements on Advanced EHF and Fleet Ballistic Missile in 2020 compared to 2019.
Regarding SpaceX, I'll let Jim chime in. We at ULA, we, Boeing, and the United Launch Alliance leadership team, we have seen SpaceX as an emerging threat. They are more than an emerging threat right now. What I would say is, of the recent competitions we've had with them, we've actually been pleased with the outcome of where ULA landed relative to SpaceX. I think going forward, we're confident that we certainly have the mission-capable abilities, but we also think we now have a price point that is compelling to customers that'll allow ULA to get its fair share of awards over SpaceX. I don't know, Jim, if you want to talk about the next two.
Sure. When it comes to contested space, all I'll say is that there are kinetic and non-kinetic emerging threats to on-orbit space assets and even ground stations and the links between them. As prudent national defense, I think our government's going to need to understand and work with industry on how to address those kinds of threats. I'll leave it there. Those threats are emerging, and they're becoming more material. When it comes to the new satellite constellation, this is, to me, coming from the telecom and technology sector, the real cracking open of the door of having a multilayer, multilateral, survivable communication system, that can enable a 5G.MIL concept that we're working with. I think it was a real breakthrough for Rick Ambrose and his business to win a big part of that. It's called the transport layer, as I said.
What that does is put a low orbit constellation up, similar to what you're hearing about in the commercial sector, that will be able to transmit 5G speed, capacity, and latency signals between really all domains now. It'd be into upper space orbits, down to aircraft in the air, to ground troops and vehicles, to shipborne operations, and theoretically and potentially even to undersea. This transport layer is sort of one of the first elements of what we would envision in the future as 5G.MIL architecture. We're right in the middle of designing that now with our customers. Yeah, it's an important piece. There'll be more competition. This will be a competitive space, but we want to get out in front of it.
I think the Space business area of Lockheed Martin gives us a huge advantage over really anyone else in taking the lead in this.
Next, we'll go to Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Can you hear me?
Yes. Hi, Noah.
Okay. Hello. Ken, I thought you had been pretty consistent for a while here that MFC would remain the fastest-growing segment of the company for a few more years. Recognizing that the dispersion of the growth rates you just guided to for revenue in 2021 by segment is pretty tight, you didn't guide it to be the fastest-growing segment, and it's a meaningful deceleration from 2020. What's changed there, if anything, or you just have conservatism built into that? On the margin in that segment, following that coming down for a few years now with the mix shift, is that bottoming in 2020 or any color on the margin going forward in that segment would be helpful as well.
You bet. Thanks, Noah, for the question. Yeah, there's a couple things. Let's talk top line. There's a couple things going on. As I mentioned, when Sheila opened up the call with the question on where we saw slowness of growth, some of it is just some of our tactical strike missile programs are at capacity right now. Think of HELLFIRE and GMLRS. You have a little bit of a timing issue with THAAD, but going forward, we see growth with THAAD. The growth opportunities for missiles and fire control down the road will be PAC-3 and precision fires for the most part because they are not at capacity, and we are seeing extremely strong demand internationally and domestically for that product. What we didn't talk about in the development phase still is the large classified program that we have.
We will start to see in the next four to five years that go into limited rate production and then ultimately into production, and you'll see a large increase there as well. I think you see, at least in the short term, some of the areas are going to be capped by capacity, but we'll work with our customer based on the strong demand that we see. Does it make sense to us to increase our capacity for, say, Hellfires, for example? Regarding margins, for 2021, we actually do see, it's a slight decline to margins in 2021, and I do mean slight. As we've talked about it before, and I just mentioned it, with that development program, as it continues to grow
At the top line, we'll see dilution there. That's the main reason. Think of margins as a slight dilution in 2021.
Next we go to the line of Ron Epstein with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.
Hey. Good morning, guys.
Morning.
Jim, just a quick question for you, back on the technology stuff. Back in, it was a couple of weeks ago, DoD announced their 5G experimentation and testing at five different installations. I was surprised to learn that Lockheed wasn't part of that, given what you've been saying lately. Can you talk about that? What you think about that? Is that an area that Lockheed would be interested in or is that just something that the company's not interested in?
Well, there's two concepts around 5G. One is standard communications activity. Terrestrial, if you will, commercial communication. What is generally going on in the programs awarded that you're referring to, is certain bases or ranges are going to have a standard terrestrial 5G implementation on those bases and ranges. That's not so much what we're interested in. We're interested in operationalizing the technical capabilities of 5G waveforms and technology software and hardware to improve our defense products and our defense products performance in an interrelated way. That's a derivative of having the network in place. At a base level, that's not going to really deliver what we're looking for. We need a global 5G connectivity platform, that's why space is so important, an element of this.
It's also why our airborne platforms will likely have a big role as well, because we need edge compute nodes and edge transmission points to be able to get into battle outside of the bases, if you will. We're really talking more about how do you go to war on a battlefield and bring with you and have available to you the throughput of data, the latency benefits, and the ability to do software-defined networks and manage spectrum dynamically on a battlefield. That's really what we're after, and that will improve our national defense.
Next, we'll go to Cai von Rumohr with Cowen. Please go ahead.
Yes. Thank you so much for all the great information you're giving us. Cash flow, you expect cash flow from ops up $100 million next year, even though looks like you have a headwind in pension of about $1 billion. You have a headwind in terms of payroll tax deferrals, looks like $500 million. What are the drivers to get you up? What's happening to CapEx? How much is that going to come down? Maybe give us some color, if you could, in terms of the relative direction in 2022. Thanks.
You bet, Cai. Good morning. Yeah, we've been embarking on what I'll call a culture of cash for quite some time now, and we are actually starting to see the fruits of that effort, Cai. To your point, what we're seeing in 2021, as I stated in my prepared comments, I gave you all some color on 2021, 2022 on our last call. Here's what we're seeing now. Obviously, the farther out we go, the little less granular it is. To the best of our abilities by doing long-range plan balance sheets and cash flow statements, what we're seeing right now is, as you stated, $8.1 billion of cash from operations in 2021, which, as we stated, is $300 million above the outlook we talked about earlier. Right now, we're seeing CapEx in 2021 at about $1.7 billion.
That's fairly consistent with what we're seeing this year. As you mentioned, we've got the payroll tax holiday this year. It's a tailwind of $460 million. We're also getting the benefit of about $750 million-$800 million by the end of the year of the acceleration of the progress payment rate from 80% to 90%. We are going to accelerate all of those benefits that we got from the government to our supply chain. We will be whole. We'll have the government whole in 2020 with those benefits we received. With that payroll tax, we do have a headwind. 50% of that $460 million gets paid next year, that is a headwind. The other half gets paid out in 2022. As you state, we do have a billion-dollar pension contribution next year.
In the following year, what we're seeing in 2022 is we now see a number closer to $8.2 billion. We gave you a little color in the last call. We were at $7.9 billion, another $300 million improvement on cash from operations. We see CapEx today, based on what we know today in terms of our capacity requirements and infrastructure builds and whatnot, $1.7 billion.
In 2022, CapEx will be roughly $1.7 billion from 2020 to 2022. Actually, out to 2023, we think CapEx right now is about $1.7 billion. We have that other headwind, as we mentioned on payroll tax in 2022, and we have the pension payment, it's about $1.7 billion out in 2022. Think pre-pension payment, our cash from operations right now in 2022 is about $10 billion. Now, the only other wildcard in all this is we've talked about the change in the R&D tax assumptions, where we're no longer expensing R&D out in 2022 and beyond. We're amortizing it. That assumption would reduce our cash from operations out in 2022 by $2.1 billion. Out in 2023, we see cash from operations of greater than or equal to $8.3 billion, another $100 million increase from where we see 2022.
I mentioned our CapEx at about $1.7 billion. Right now, we're forecasting a pension contribution of roughly $1.7 billion, and the R&D impact goes down from $2.1 billion, it'll be about $1.8 billion out in that time period. We have spent a lot of effort on our working capital improvements. To be frank, Cai, we think certainly in contract assets, we have some opportunities still to hopefully improve these numbers.
Our next question's from Doug Harned with Bernstein. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning.
Good morning.
I have a kind of two-part question on the F-35. When you look at the President's budgets, they keep taking down numbers for the F-35. Congress keeps adding some back, and at the same time, you've got some growing international opportunities, which you've talked about, but those don't come immediately. One would think a more stable trajectory would be helpful here. How do you plan production around this kind of scenario? As we see more growth coming from sustainment, how do you think that will affect your margin trajectory on the F-35?
I'll take that, Doug. Yeah. Right now, because of COVID impacts, we've started the year, roughly, we thought we were going to deliver about 140 aircraft this year. They are predominantly Lot 12 airplanes, that's the first lot of our block buy. Right now the team is forecasting rough numbers, 120 to 125. It's still a little bit in flux, that's our outlook right now. Right now, based on what we're seeing and working with our supply chain, and working with our production operations team, we're outlooking roughly 140 aircraft deliveries out in 2021. We think based on the demand we have, with Lot 12, 13, 14, and ultimately, I talked about the Lot 15 production lot order that we're hopeful we'll get, at the end of this quarter.
We see about 169, so let's just round up to 170 aircraft delivered out in the 2022 time period. Out in 2023, we see similar, about 170 aircraft. That's basically predicated on the U.S. government program of record. Earlier year would have some, to your point, congressional adds, we're not assuming any congressional adds, at least today, once you get beyond 2021. There is still pent-up demand with our partner countries, our FMS customers' demand. As you stated, Doug, out in that time period, there are other interests for the airplane with our partner countries, existing FMS countries, and there are some new potential FMS countries that potentially will buy aircraft, it'll be beyond the 2023 time period. I think we have a pretty good handle out to about 2022, 2023, where we think our production is going to be.
Regarding margins, it really comes down to the PBL. Right now, just based on how the customer is buying sustainment, it is dilutive to the overall F-35 portfolio. Where we do see opportunities is in production. We do think if we continue to perform, continue to weed out inefficiencies, and hopefully negotiate a deal where the customer rewards us for that, there is production opportunities. It comes down to the PBL, and we do believe we are starting to get more and more interest from the customer for a PBL, a performance-based logistics concept, and that would have us taking on investment, us industry taking on investment risk, and it would then give us the opportunity, assuming we perform and hit the service level agreements we'll sign up to, for that to be margin accretive.
Next, we'll go to Jon Raviv with Citi. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and good almost afternoon. Question about sort of CapEx environment you are operating in. As you can see, there is a lot of focus on your growth rates, especially deceleration from 2020 growth to 2021 growth, at least how you see it now. At the same time, CapEx is remaining at this $1.7 level, you said 2021, 2022, 2023. Even though there seems to be an assumption that growth rates and opportunities are slowing down, you are still spending a lot more CapEx than you were almost ever. How do we sort of square those two things? Is the industry, the customer, I should say, offering you enough certainty to be spending that CapEx such that you know it will have the long-term payoff that we are all looking for?
Thanks. Hi, Jon. Almost good afternoon. It's Ken, I'll take that. If you go around the portfolio, we are still seeing demand for CapEx. There's one point I'll make, and I'll hand it to Jim because he may have a comment on this as well. If you think Aeronautics, we have slowed down our capitalization spend on F-35 because of COVID, but if we're still going to ramp up to those higher quantities that I described when Doug asked me the question on F-35, we are going to have to still build out our capacity on F-35. The same with F-16. Jim mentioned our backlog right now is 130 aircraft. We're going to deliver our first airplane roughly beginning of 2022.
Rough numbers, we'll do about 80 a year, then ultimately, by the time we get out to the middle of this decade, we'll be delivering three to four F-16s a month. We will have to build out that capacity. We've talked about the classified win in Palmdale. We still need to build the building out there, and we are hopeful that performing on that program, there are other customers that have a keen interest in that program, and that's one of the opportunities I talked about when Sheila asked the question. There are opportunities out there for us that just frankly, aren't planned right now. If you look at missiles and fire control, we are still building out capacity for PAC-3, though we're not building it out for, say, HELLFIRE or GMLRS. We'll talk to the customer.
We feel very good about the PAC-3 build out, for example. We do see opportunities for 500-plus PAC-3s per year and potentially significantly more than that. The question then is it the right time for us to continue building out in excess of the 500 per year that we are going to build out? Space, we have the state-of-the-art Gateway Center, and there are some other opportunities out there where we have to spend capital. RMS, they've done a very nice job of portfolio shaping. That is the place we really don't see a lot of facilitization or increased capital. One thing Jim has tasked us on, and we're in the middle of doing this, not just with capital, but IRAD, and then other investments are there low-hanging fruit, if you will, where it doesn't make sense for us to spend that capital or our IRAD?
Are there places where we should be investing regarding 21st Century Warfighter, the digitalization effort that we're trying to take on? Though we may stay at the same level, the balance or the mix of our spend may change over time.
Just the one comment I'd add to that is we are raising the capital expense decision-making process a level, and we're going to be looking across all the business areas simultaneously and doing the rank ordering at that level, which may result in some adjustments as Ken suggested. I would highlight the digital transformation side of this, which is both in the factory offices and in functions. That's going to help us meet our customers' needs on one hand, but it's also going to help us improve margins on the other hand and be more efficient internally as we do all of this. There's investment upfront for that as well. It's going to have a dual benefit.
Our next question's from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much, and good morning. I think, Ken, you mentioned a little bit earlier the profitability expectation for Missiles and Fire Control in 2021. Can you just walk us through the other segments real quick?
You bet. Thanks, Seth. I think we're at the afternoon now.
Okay.
At Aeronautics, we expect a slight improvement in margins from 2020, which we're very pleased with. F-35 margins and the balance of our combat air margins are expected to increase, and that's consistent with our overall margins. We expect fairly consistent margins in 2021 on air mobility. The combat air and air mobility margin improvements more than offset the dilution because you would expect just where the Skunk Works is, that they would be dilutive. I mentioned Missiles and Fire Control, so I'll move on to RMS. We're happy to see returns to double-digit margins this year, and we expect a slight improvement in 2021, which we're very pleased with. All that integration work that we've talked about, we talked about the portfolio shaping that we're doing at RMS, we're starting to see the results there. Sikorsky is the primary driver.
They'll have year-over-year improvements on production programs. Think of those, Seth, as BLACK HAWK, VH-92, and CRH. Lastly at Space, we'll see a little bit of an erosion in margins in 2021, and that's very similar to Missiles and Fire Control. You're seeing dilution due to the OPIR development program and also increased development content at strategic and missile defense portfolios. Think of that as hypersonics the next-generation interceptor. Thanks for the question.
It's Jim. I'll end the session today by reiterating that Lockheed Martin completed another quarter of strong financial and operational performance. With that robust backlog, focus on our program execution, and strong demand for the portfolio of products and services we have, we're positioned for a successful closure of 2020 and continued growth in 2021. Thank you all again for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you on our next earnings call, which will be in January. That concludes the call, John. Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.