Good afternoon, and thank you for attending today's First Quarter 2023 Earnings Release Call for HomeStreet Bank. Joining us on this call is Mark Mason, CEO, President, and Chairman of Board. I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Mark Mason. Please go ahead.
Hello, thank you for joining us for our first quarter 2023 earnings call. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that our detailed earnings release and accompanying investor presentation were filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on Monday and are available on our website at ir.homestreet.com under the News & Events link. In addition, a recording of it and a transcript of this call will be available at the same address following our call.
Please note that during our call today, we will make certain predictive statements that reflect our current views, the expectations and uncertainties about the company's performance and financial results. These are likely forward-looking statements that are made subject to the safe harbor statements included in Monday's earnings release, our investor deck, and the risk factors disclosed in our other public filings.
Reconciliations to non-GAAP measures referred to on our call today can be found in our earnings release and investor deck available on our website. Joining me today is our Chief Financial Officer, John Michel. John will briefly discuss our financial results, and then I'd like to give an update on our results of operations and our outlook going forward. John?
Thank you, Mark. Good morning, everyone, thank you for joining us. In the first quarter of 2023, our net income was $5.1 million or $0.27 per share as compared to net income of $8.5 million or $0.45 per share in the fourth quarter of 2022. In the first quarter of 2023, our annualized return on average tangible equity was 4.1%. Our Annualized Return on Average Assets was 22 basis points, and our efficiency ratio was 87.2%. These results reflect the continuing adverse impact the significant increase in short-term interest rates has had on our business.
Our net interest income in the first quarter of 2023 was $6.3 million, lower than the fourth quarter of 2022 due to a decrease in our net interest margin from 2.53% to 2.23%. The decrease in our net interest margin was due to a 52 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which was partially offset by an 11 basis point increase in the yield on interest-bearing assets.
Yields on interest-earning assets increased as yields on investment securities improved and the adjustable rate loan yields increased due to increases in the indices in which their rates are based. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was due to the overall higher deposit and borrowing costs.
Our cost of borrowings increased 64 basis points during the first quarter, while the cost of deposits increased 56 basis points. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2023 was 22%, which is the expected tax rate for the rest of 2023. A 0.6 million provision for credit losses was recorded during the first quarter of 2023 compared to a $3.8 million provision for credit losses in the fourth quarter of 2022. The provision for the first quarter of 2023 primarily related to the net charge-offs realized in the quarter as overall portfolio loan balances only increased $60 million.
Going forward, we expect the ratio of our allowance for credit losses to our loans held for investment portfolio to remain relatively stable and provisioning in future periods to generally reflect changes in the balance of our loans held for investments, assuming our history of minimal charge-offs continues. Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets remained low at 15 basis points. The increase in non-interest income in the first quarter of 2023 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2022 was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in single-family lending gain on sale activities.
The $2.1 million increase in non-interest expenses in the first quarter of 2023 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2022 was primarily due to higher compensation and benefit costs, partially offset by lower information services costs.
The higher level of compensation and benefit costs was due to seasonally higher benefit costs, primarily employee taxes and 401(k) matches, and a reduction in deferred costs due to lower levels of loan production. Additionally, the benefits of lower levels of staffing resulting from layoffs in our loan origination operations in the first quarter were offset by the impact of raises given during the first quarter and the employees added from the acquisition of three branches in Southern California. I will now turn the call over to Mark.
Thank you, John. The banking industry experienced significant turmoil during the 1st quarter, driven by the now historically record velocity and magnitude of the Federal Reserve's increases in short-term rates during this cycle. As with other banks, we experienced some marginal deposit outflow in March beyond that which we have experienced to date from deposit competition as a few depositors moved funds from community regional banks to national banks. Very few actually. Consistent with our peers, however, these depositor anxiety outflows appear to be substantially abated in April.
We're fortunate in this environment that our level of uninsured deposits is among the lowest in banking at 14% of deposits at the end of March. We expect rate-based competition for deposits to continue till the Federal Reserve stops raising rates and ultimately reduces rates. While we have not seen any material deposit or anxiety, we took steps at quarter end to improve our liquidity position. At quarter end, we held substantially more cash than we would in the normal course, over $300 million more.
While we are unlikely to continue this practice, we felt a temporary increase in on-balance sheet liquidity was appropriate at that time. Also, where appropriate, we are working with a few of our customers to secure additional FDIC insurance coverage, either through changes in account vesting or through the IntraFi ICS and CDARS programs. Additionally, in the quarter, we utilized the Fed Bank Term Funding Program, which for us is a lower cost wholesale funding option, which provides for a fixed rate funding that can be refinanced without penalty if rates decrease.
We have used this program to replace FHLB borrowings in part, given the lower rates, term structure, and greater collateral utilization. At quarter end, our contingent funding availability was $6 billion, representing six times the level of uninsured deposits and 85% of total deposits. During the first quarter, we significantly reduced our level of loan originations and continued to offer very competitive promotional price deposits, which allowed us to attract and retain deposits without immediately repricing our existing interest-bearing deposit base.
Over time, of course, customers in our non-promotional deposit products are expected to migrate to the better yielding promotional products, though this migration has been slow. This ongoing migration is part of the continuing increase in our overall deposit costs. The competitive rate environment has resulted in reductions on our net interest margin, which are expected to continue until rates stabilize in later fall.
Today, based upon commentary from the Federal Reserve, that time appears to run through the end of this year. We have not experienced material identifiable deposit loss related to concerns about deposit security. Other than seasonal tax payments, we've seen stability in our deposit balances in April. We are fortunate to have a valuable retail deposit franchise with customers who will invest in certificates of deposit and money market deposit accounts at rates well below brokerage money market funds, treasuries, and wholesale borrowing rates.
Additionally, based on our experience, we expect many of these new promotional deposit customers will convert to full relationship core deposit customers over time. In addition to our ongoing organic deposit gathering, we acquired three retail deposit branches from Union Bank, U.S. Bank in Southern California.
During the quarter, these branches experienced higher than anticipated levels of runoff, both before and after our transaction closed on the 10th of February. The balance of deposits acquired was $373 million, which declined to $322 million at March 31 due to a number of factors, including greater customer concerns than we expected about the relative size and branch footprint of HomeStreet versus U.S. Bank. Deposit outflows due to the rate sensitive environment.
Depositor security anxiety caused in part by turmoil in the banking industry, and data-driven conversion challenges that caused frustrations experienced by deposit customers. We constructively worked through these conversion issues with U.S. Bank, which resulted in a reduction to the deposit premium we paid. As a result, we did not pay a premium for a majority of the post-closing runoff we experienced in the quarter.
The additional goodwill recorded from this acquisition was substantially lower than originally anticipated, reducing the impact on our tangible book value. In spite of these challenges, we're excited about the branches and teams that joined the bank and our opportunity to now grow our customer base in these new communities. These communities have only been served by large national banks. Until this transaction, they did not have a community bank choice.
In the first quarter, we recorded a $0.6 million addition to our allowance for credit losses. This addition primarily relates to replenishing the ACL for the minimal level of net charge-offs, as the loan portfolio barely increased during the quarter. Charge-offs in the quarter were $0.6 million, and non-performing assets remained low at 0.15% of total assets.
Total delinquencies were slightly higher in the quarter at 41 basis points versus 29 basis points in the prior quarter. While delinquencies remain low, an increase in the over 90-day past due and still accruing category was due to one residential construction loan that matured at the end of 2022. This project, which has a substantial level of over-collateralization, has been completed and sales are now occurring, so we have no concerns about it.
Overall, we are happy with the velocity of sales in our residential construction book. Generally, today we are getting a higher level of project completions and payoffs than new projects. This developer conservatism is appropriate for this point in the cycle despite the ongoing low level of homes available. We expect home building loan volume to begin growing again once rates stabilize and mortgage rates return to normal spreads.
Our loan portfolio remains well diversified, with our highest concentration in western states multifamily loans, one of the lowest risk loan types historically. Our delinquencies, non-performing assets and classified assets remain at historically low levels. Our portfolio is conservatively underwritten with a very low expected loss potential. Credit quality remains solid. We currently do not see any meaningful credit challenges on the horizon.
We are continuing to experience the cyclical downturn in commercial real estate and single-family mortgage loan volume, which fell to historically low levels in the fourth quarter of last year, but only marginally improved in the first quarter. One of the largest challenges for us has been the impact on prepayment speeds, which continue at historically low levels, particularly for multifamily loans.
We are generally not making any new multifamily loans today, with the exception of Fannie Mae DUS loans, which we sell. We're focused today on working with our existing borrowers to create prepayments or to modify existing loans to advance more proceeds where appropriate or extend fixed-rate periods in exchange for increasing the interest rate on these loans. Over time, we expect these efforts to make a meaningful improvement in both the size and yield on our multifamily portfolio.
As previously noted, during the first quarter, we grew our loan portfolio by only $60 million or 1%. We are continuing to limit our loan portfolio growth, focusing our loan origination activity primarily on floating rate products such as commercial loans, residential construction loans, and home equity loans.
We are also experiencing diminished demand for loans generally, mostly due to uncertainty regarding the economy and the overall higher level of interest rates. Accordingly, we are anticipating only a modest increase in our loan portfolio in 2023. At March 31, 2023, our accumulated other comprehensive income balance, which is a component of our shareholders equity, was a negative $86 million. This represents a sizable $4.60 reduction to our tangible book value per share, but it is not a permanent impairment in the value of our equity and has no impact on our regulatory capital levels.
Given the available liquidity, earnings, and cash flow of our bank, we don't anticipate a need to sell any of these securities to meet our cash needs, so we don't anticipate realizing these temporary write-downs. While our current lower level of profitability is less than adequate to us, it has been materially driven by the exogenous interest rate environment. We look forward to what an environment of stable rates, whenever that comes, can provide for improved financial performance for our bank.
Until that time, we are doing all we can to limit balance sheet growth, maintain liquidity, defer or reduce expenses, reduce staffing to required levels without damaging our business. As we shared last quarter, the significant uncertainty of future interest rates, deposit flows, and the economic environment, among other things, make providing guidance on the timing and levels of financial targets too difficult at this time. We expect to return to such guidance after these uncertainties have substantially subsided. Our long-term goal is to meet or exceed our peers with respect to our financial performance remain.
I'll repeat my comments from last quarter. We acknowledge the relative disadvantages of our existing model in an environment such as the one we are experiencing today. We note that while this period of lower earnings is painful and somewhat unexpected, our higher-than-expected earnings growth, 2020 and 2021 was similarly great and unexpected. The current structure that makes our bank more sensitive to cyclical changes in interest rates allows us to over earn in declining rate environments.
While we have worked to reduce the impact of the cyclicality, it's important to acknowledge our through-the-cycle earnings performance. I repeat these comments again not to excuse our current low level of earnings, but to put them in perspective. With that, this concludes our prepared comments today. We appreciate your attendance and attention. John and I will be happy to answer any questions you have at this time.
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you change your mind, please press star two. We have the first question on the phone lines from Matthew Clark of Piper Sandler. You may proceed with your question, Matthew.
Hey, good morning.
Good morning.
First one for me, just on the margin. I saw the spot rate in the deck on deposits, can you give us a sense for what the average margin was in the month of March?
I'd love to, but we don't disclose monthly margins, Matt.
Okay. The branch deposits that you acquired, the $322 million at the end of the day, what was the weighted average cost of those? I assume you used those to replace brokered CDs. Could you just give us or remind us where brokered CDs stand at the end of the first quarter?
With respect to brokered CDs, you know, they generally track Fed funds, either above or below. Last year, brokered CDs were generally below Fed funds. They're a lot closer today.
May I add actually in response to your question from last quarter. On page 18 of our earnings release, we have included the balance of brokered deposits broken out, so you can see what the balances are.
The cost of funds.
Okay. Got it. I can see that. Sorry.
The cost of funds on new branches when we acquired them were less than 20 basis points. Obviously we put them in our system, and it increased the cost slightly. I don't have the exact number of what they are right now, but they should be a little bit higher because our rates were a little bit higher, but not substantial.
Okay. Got it. Then what's the plan for the $2 billion of borrowings? Do you feel like you're gonna hold on to those for a while until things kind of settle down and then pay them off with cash? I'm just trying to get a sense for the excess liquidity situation.
Well, one, we're not gonna carry the high level of cash through the quarter or next quarter. We did that at the end of March out of a view that demonstrating more on-balance sheet liquidity would be important to certain people at this time. I don't think we think that's necessary today because, you know, market anxiety, from what we can tell, has largely abated.
You know, $300 million of those borrowings is gonna be it's already gone down. It is our plan to reduce our borrowings down to about $1 billion over the forward look, right? We plan on doing that through continuing to raise primarily certificates of deposit balances. We continue to raise new money there. How long that will take is a little uncertain at this point. We'd love to have it done by year-end. We may not. It's likely to continue into next year.
Okay. On your criticized classified trends, any update there in terms of the rate of change between year-end and this quarter? If you had it, the reserve on office CRE.
First, office CRE. We haven't made an office CRE loan in several years now, and those that we have, on the books are, you can characterize as suburban office, small office. If you look at the detail on our investor deck, you can see it's pretty granular as well. I don't have the dollar amount of the average loan size, but it's single-digit millions, I think. Charlie might.
Yeah. I'll pull it up.
Pull that up.
Yeah.
Sorry, Matt, I forgot the second part of that question.
On criticizing costs.
Oh, criticizing-.
Just your criticized trends. Relatively stable.
Relatively stable. We don't disclose them in the quarterlies. I can't remember if we do in the 10-Q or not.
In the call report it's disclosed.
It's in the call report, right?
Yeah.
You can check the call report for the levels, but they're relatively stable.
The office, the average balance in is $2.4 million in office.
Right.
Total portfolio, $376. Pretty much broken down.
Yep. Yep. Saw that. Okay. Yep. Okay. Just last one from me. Is there anything more I know your outlook for expenses, operating expenses are flat from here. Is there anything you can do to kind of right-size expenses given the kind of NIM pressures that are gonna persist here? Is there some consideration or thought about, you know, maybe even shrinking the balance sheet to alleviate the pressure on the funding side?
We continue to work on all of those things, Matt, right? Those are the obvious levers, right? We continue to work on expenses. We've had, as we noted, some additional layoffs in the first quarter. We think that we're pretty much right at baseline staffing today. We are trying to be thoughtful and careful about not gutting our lending lines to businesses so that when the rate environment changes, that we can take advantage of that.
Though we are very lean today in those in those business lines. Balance sheet shrinkage, we would love to shrink certain parts of it, of course, more quickly, right? We'd love to shrink our multifamily portfolio more quickly. The single-family runoff rate is a little low historically, but not quite as bad.
The rest of the portfolio is sort of running at sort of historical prepayment speeds. There are things that will change those prepayment speeds. The most significant one, of course, is the prospect of more rates going forward. The multifamily portfolio has been particularly sticky, as you might expect, given the rates on the loans when they were originated. That's why we're very focused on working with those borrowers to provide some value to them, either in additional advances on low LTV loans or extension of fixed rate periods in exchange for increasing those rates.
We got some of that done this quarter. The typical deal with this quarter raised rates from the low to mid 3% range to 5%-5.25%. That's a meaningful change on those loans. In those cases, we simply extended the fixed rate period for those loans, and in a pool of loans we rebalanced some. We have a lot of opportunity for that. I think that's gonna be easier until rates fall than trying to hope for prepayments that are unlikely to occur. That as soon as we get some relief on rates, we're going to see more significant prepayments. The other lending we're doing is primarily revolving, right?
While you may see new origination levels of a certain amount, those are commitment levels and not new balances. All of that new lending is at very current variable rates, right? It's, you know, rates are between 7% and 9% generally. We need that, we need that revenue, right?
Given our marginal funding rate, a 7%-9% loan still has a lot more substantial spread than our net interest margin today. We're looking for other ways to reduce the balance sheet. I just don't know if the magnitude will be as great as getting some relief on prepayment speeds. Those are the things that we continue to work on while continuing to think of new and more attractive ways to raise new deposits. Obviously a very competitive market.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you. We now have Don Koch of Koch Investments. You may proceed.
Hi. I've got several questions. One strategic and three tactical. I'll ask the strategic question, and then just please give me some color on this, and that is, I'm just a little very puzzled. You're a premier, outstanding financial institution in one of the best states in the nation. Why in the world would you wanna put your foot into a manure patch in one of the worst states in the nation with very high taxes, high crime, and extremely poor governance? Now, I've read your review. I've read the 24,000 accounts. I mean, you're four hours away by plane. I mean, do you have the skill set and the overview?
I mean, of all the places I wanna have increased my presence, anything in California, in California banking has a huge discount to sort of economic value because only 750,000 people left the state last year. I mean, all you have to do is look at the out-migration of U-Haul, and there's no state in the nation that comes anywhere close to 750,000 people voting with their feet. I'll ask the strategic question.
Just give me some sense as to why you thought that a four-hour plane ride away was where you wanted to be and sort of plant your flag and say, "Gee, we..." I understand the idea of community banking and you're playing with franchises, but where does that go? I mean, can you take someone from North Carolina and then say, "Gee, we want to put you in Southern California to be the manager?" How is that gonna work? How do you think strategically, where do you see yourself moving in Southern California?
Well, I appreciate the question. I don't know if you know my background or other members of management. We all came from Southern California.
You're not there now, though.
Go ahead.
You're not headquarters.
Yeah.
Headquartered there.
If you would allow me to finish.
Yeah.
Look, to grow, you have to have an attractive product, and you have to have a reasonably sized market, right? The markets in the Pacific Northwest are incredibly small relative to Southern California. Southern California arguably is the largest individual market in the United States. We're very familiar with Southern California. We entered Southern California many years ago at this point. We've acquired two banks. We've acquired a number of branches.
We've opened a number of de novo branches. Today, about a third of our branches are in Southern California. Our decision to add to that branch network was a fairly easy one. In particular, because these three new branches are in smaller communities that match up well with community banking. The deposits in those branches are super sticky. They're primarily small consumer balances, which today are highly valuable.
They are very rate insensitive. We match up very well with those markets. Look, I completely understand your negative comments on California. They are spot on. However, California is not going anywhere. It's still gonna be a very large market forever. We're already there, and this decision was a fairly easy one and timely.
Okay. three other just simple tactical questions. Do you have, in the immediate future, some kind of. You know, if I were looking at what you have now, I'd be very aggressive in a buyback, and I'd encourage all my management and all my employees to buy the stock and have some kind of signaling from the board members that each board member acquires 10,000 shares of stock at $11. I mean, this is absurd.
If you have a real book value of close to $30 and the stock's $11, I mean, there's a real phenomenal disconnect and lifetime opportunity. That type of signaling, just signaling by buying 1,000 shares, gives a tremendous comfort to the market that you guys are putting your money where your mouth is.
Understood. As a company, we're not in a position to buy back stock at this time. Right?
No. I saw that.
We're just... Yeah, we're just not. Right. Love to, and we've done a lot of that over the last several years.
Yep.
We'd much rather have been purchasing stock today, obviously. That's not in the cards. We discussed with our board the opportunity. You know, we have, we have requirements for our board members to own a certain amount of stock. I believe it's 3x their annual retainer, which is not insignificant. I think most, if not all of them, are close to that. We do discuss it. At the end of the day, it's an individual decision, but we do discuss that. We've never been faced with this kind of low stock price. We'll see what happens. Your point's well taken.
Two other quick tactical questions. There's a difference between goodwill and book value. If I understand this correctly, there's the assets that went into some kind of impairment. Those basically roll off after four or five years. The question is, those assets that were now at a market rate less than what you purchased, is the maturity for the most part about five years or four years? I mean, you're gonna have about 20% of that bucket come back into book value every year. Is that about right?
It would be for the core deposit intangible, that is correct.
Yeah.
That over a period of seven to eight years. The goodwill is not amortized. It's based on the books.
Are you talking about the securities?
No, I'm talking about the security roll-off. I mean, those things, the maturity of those securities roll off.
Oh, got it. I'm sorry.
Yep.
That's what I thought. The average duration in the portfolio-.
Yeah.
Today is four and a half years, right?
Yeah.
Your calculation is kinda correct if you think about back of the envelope, right?
Yep, yep. That's what I'm asking for.
The more practical consideration is that discount might come back sooner with a change in rates.
Sure. Yeah.
Right? Between the two, it's obviously coming back, right?
Right. The last question is, maybe have you gone back to some of your, you know, 19% of your deposits are above the $250 level. If you have a large $5 million or $7 million, $10 million deposit, have you ever done these reverse repos where you say, "Look, your money is good. Don't worry about it. We'll give you an investment account?" Can you go back to your individual people who have large deposits and find a way to sort of give them comfort to stay in the game?
First of all, it's 14%, not 19%, our level.
Okay. I was reading off your news release, but that's okay. Go ahead.
I think it's 14%.
Okay.
Because I do want to make sure we got the right number.
Yeah.
not reverse repos, but we do use, the IntraFi products, ICS and CDARS. If you're not familiar-
Oh.
With those, you might check it out. Okay, you are familiar. That's really the best way because then we can get them 100% FDIC insurance with rates-
Yep.
That we customize for each customer.
Yeah.
We are doing that. I'm surprised. I guess I feel fortunate that we don't have many customers that have had much anxiety.
Right.
I feel good about that. Where we have had some, you know, they do wanna stay with us. They don't want to go somewhere, we have utilized that product.
Yeah. Well, my, you know, I congratulate you on all what you're doing. We've been major investors for a long time. We see you as a Southeastern opportunity and presence. I mean, I think good governance, low crime, responsible government is where at least we continue to put our equity assets into because we wanna stay out of states that basically can't get their act together.
I mean, we don't own any property in Chicago or Baltimore or San Francisco, we run away from areas where governance is just too crazy to, you know. When you have 12% marginal tax rate, everybody just votes with their feet. Your Southeastern presence is what gives you a real premium over the time. Thank you for your good job. Keep doing a good job.
Well, thank you. We appreciate the questions and the comments, sir.
Okay, thank you.
We now have Woody Lay of KBW. You may proceed with your question, Woody.
Hey, good afternoon, guys.
Hey, Woody.
Hey, Woody.
wanted to touch on deposits. If you adjust for the acquired balances, they were down about 10% quarter-over-quarter, which was mostly from that broker deposit bucket. Can you just walk through the dynamics that were at play in that segment? Were the declines really from, you know, losing deposits due to competition, just trying to figure out what drove that decline and sort of do you think the broker deposits can continue to increase from here?
We use broker deposits interchangeably with borrowings. We are conscious of our loan-to-deposit ratio, you know, we look at the cost of funds, right? Last year, the cost of broker deposits was much more attractive to borrowings. It's a little less attractive recently, and that's why you see the decline in broker deposits relative to borrowings. Plus, the attractiveness of the Federal Reserve program, I forget the initiative.
Same thing, Bank Term.
Bank Term Funding Program. We decided to use some of that as well. To your larger question, though, the real small loss in deposits in the quarter, that was primarily in March. We did very well in January and February. March, I think, highlighted, everything that happened in March highlighted the yield opportunity.
You know, it's amazing to me, how slowly a lot of deposits have recognized the change in yield opportunity in the market. It's a good thing, and this is true for all banks, right? Our customers really are loyal to us and really do like banking with us. That they're willing to accept a lower yield than maybe the absolute highest yield they could find someplace in the marketplace.
Over time, a certain number of customers sort of each month make that decision either to move inside of our products, let's say from Black Rate Money Market to a promotional money market or a promotional CD account, and/or move money out. You know, you can always find even though we have a very competitive rate structure on our promotional products, it is not the absolute highest in the marketplace, right?
Example, you know, our highest promotional CD rate today is 4.25%. Obviously, you can find them at over 5% in the market today. It's kind of an art. Not kind of. It is an art today to price deposits because if you're not careful, you can raise your deposit costs and not increase the number of new customers that you attract.
Yet you'll reprice existing customers at levels higher than they would happily accept. We did a little bit of that recently. We had at one point over the last month, a 4.75% high rate, and we found that we didn't raise materially any more new money. We just repriced existing money at a higher level. We dropped it back down to 4.25%. It's an interesting market.
I do feel that because we have such a low level of uninsured deposits, that our runoff experience to date, and I include last year's runoff, is gonna slow, I believe. The smaller the deposit balance, the smaller the motivation for the customer to seek higher yields. It just happens like that, right? A lot of this money sticks around because the depositors don't have very large savings accounts. They like to move money in and out of them. They're very happy with the service. That's the franchise, right? That's why it has value. I don't know if that's a full answer, but that's sort of what we've experienced.
Yeah. Oh, Woody, one other comment on the broker deposits.
Yeah.
We utilize traditional broker deposits. We do not have relationships that are classified as broker deposits. We usually go through the open market and get broker deposits that way. Dealers. We don't have relationships that are coming in and out, and they're deciding not to be with us in our broker deposits.
Got it.
If that makes sense.
Yes, no, that makes sense. Maybe on those acquired deposits at quarter end, they were about $322 million. Have you seen those balances stabilize so far in April?
We believe we have. Though April has seasonal outflows for taxes, and it's a little hard right now to read through what are tax payment losses or other reductions. We're gonna know better next month.
Got it. All right last from me. Can you just sort of talk through the rationale of lowering the dividend to $0.10 versus, you know, suspending it all together? Maybe if you could just give us some overall thoughts on your capital position?
Sure. first, you know, we believe that we still have a solid capital position, right? Our CET1 is still about 8%.
Over 8%.
Over 8% today. And substantial with more level of capital at the bank, of course, right? We feel comfortable that we have sufficient capital today to provide for any growth, of course, we're not trying to grow the balance sheet and our risk profile today.
Why did we lower the dividend? Well, we lowered the dividend because we are concerned that the level of profitability this year may not be sufficient to feel comfortable continuing to pay our regular quarterly dividend that we've had over the last year. We do that in an abundance of caution. Part of our job as managers of a bank is to make sure that we are sufficiently conservative in distributions in relation to the capital needs of the company, the risk profile, and today, the environment.
The level of uncertainty in the environment about the range of future results led the board to the decision to reduce the dividend. We did not eliminate the dividend because we believe the company is going to remain profitable. We are concerned about the predictability of the level of profit given the range of outcomes this year. The board determined that it was appropriate at this time to lower the dividend to a level that they felt very comfortable with.
Got it. All right, that's all from me. Thanks for taking my questions.
Thank you.
Thanks, Woody.
Thank you. We now have Christian Koch with KAM South. You may proceed with your question.
Hi. Good afternoon, gentlemen. It's Dr. Christian Koch . I guess my biggest concern after listening to you all speak for about 1 hour is, Mark, you've cited several times that you're hoping and waiting for interest rates to level out or go down, and I think we all are on the same page on that. That's not a business strategy.
My point is, do you have a playbook where, you know, long rates go to 5% or 7%? Obviously, you know, that's not positive. You need to be prepared for the worst and hope for the best. I guess I'm struggling with your hope of rates going down versus how you manage the business. Could you just talk a little bit about your positioning on that?
Sure. Well, look, we're essentially positioned for that today, right? Everything we do today is focused on managing the balance sheet, maintaining liquidity, having a competitive deposit product, and, in trying to manage pressure on funding, right? My comments about a lower interest rate environment really relate to the structure of our balance sheet. I mean, the reality is we are structured, somewhat liability sensitive.
This balance sheet and these lines of business, and, you know, not insignificant of which is mortgage lending, they perform better and stable to fall in the rate markets. To say our only business strategy is hoping for decline is not necessarily true. It's an observation on the structure of our businesses. Hopefully I didn't suggest our only strategy was a hope.
I would add that we've taken steps to address the potentials for, as you say, prepare for the worst and hope for the best. We've put over $1.3 billion of fixed rate financing in our, you know, between our FHLB advances in the Bank Term Funding Program to lock in those rates so that if rates do go up, we do not have adverse impact from that. That's a significant portion of our borrowings today.
Excellent. Just one other follow-up. I think, in a prior comment you had mentioned on the investments portfolio that your average duration was about 4 - 4.5 years, excuse me. In theory, you could be in a position where your net interest margin and your earnings per share, net earnings are going down, yet your book equity is actually going up because that's being pulled back into the balance sheet. Is that a fair assessment of kind of how those dynamics work?
That could occur, right? It obviously depends on deposit costs, right? And general rates. Among a lot of things, including loan volume and expenses and a whole bunch of stuff, right? You're right, that could happen.
Okay. Just a funny clarification, but you had said deposit security anxiety. Is that a new, like, psychological disorder? How would you clarify that?
I don't know what the popular term is, but when, several banks notably lost a lot of deposits in March, right? I would call that depositor anxiety. Right. Now we did not experience much. In fact, it was very hard to identify any material amount. That was a marketplace issue at the end of the quarter.
All right. Thank you, guys.
Thank you for the questions.
Thank you. We now have a follow-up from Matthew Clark with Piper Sandler. You may proceed, Matthew.
Yeah. Thanks for the follow-up. Just back on capital. What do you and the board view as your most constraining capital ratio? I mean, Tier 1 is, you know, down a little bit quarter into the mid-8. Total risk base at the hold co, I think 11.15%. You have additional margin erosion coming, lower earnings. You know, fortunately, you cut the dividends. That's gonna help, I think, stabilize some of the capital ratios. I guess, you know, getting back to kind of what do you view as the most constraining capital ratio, or at least the board's view? Well, today I think that's Tier 1. That's the ratio that, we believe most sensitive today.
We are insensitive on the risk-based side because of our large multifamily portfolio, which gets 50% risk-weighted for the most part. Compared to other banks, Tier 1 is, we're a little more sensitive to Tier 1 than we are to risk-based capital measures, and the other three measures are risk-based capital measures, so.
Okay. Is there any minimum threshold that the board wants to manage to?
you know, we watch all of them. We have internal risk appetite levels for each of the measures.
Okay. Thank you.
Thanks.
Thank you, Matthew. As a reminder, if you'd still want to ask any more questions today? We have had no questions registered, so I'd like to hand it back to the management team for any final remarks.
Great. Again, we appreciate all of your attendance. Great questions today. We look forward to talking to you next quarter. Thank you.
Thank you all for joining. That does conclude today's call. You may now disconnect your line and enjoy the rest of your day.