Welcome to the Merit Medical Systems First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed in listen-only mode. Please note that this conference call is being recorded, and the recording will be available on the company's website for replay shortly. I would now like to turn the call over to Martha Aronson, Merit Medical Systems President and Chief Executive Officer.
Thank you, operator, and welcome everyone. I am joined on the call today by Raul Parra, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and Brian Lloyd, our Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary. Brian, would you please take us through the safe harbor statements?
Thank you, Martha. This presentation contains forward-looking statements that receive safe harbor protection under federal securities laws. Although we believe these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are subject to risks and uncertainties. The realization of any of these risks or uncertainties, as well as extraordinary events or transactions impacting our company, could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations and projections expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today, April 30, 2026, and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any other date. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update such statements except as required by applicable law. Please refer to the sections entitled Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in today's press release and presentation for important information regarding such statements.
For a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements, please also refer to our most recent filings with the SEC, which are available on our website. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles, which are generally accepted in the United States. However, we believe certain non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with useful information regarding the underlying business trends and performance of our ongoing operations and can be useful for period-over-period comparisons of such operations.
This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures is included in today's press release and presentation furnished to the SEC under Form 8-K. Please refer to the sections of our press release and presentation entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures for important information regarding non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call.
Readers should consider non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial reporting measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please note that these calculations may not be comparable with similarly titled measures of other companies. Both today's press release and our presentation are available on the investors page of our website. I will now turn the call back to Martha.
Thank you, Brian. Let me start with a brief agenda of what we will cover during our prepared remarks. I will begin with a brief summary of the first quarter financial results. I will discuss several areas of operating and strategic progress that we have made in recent months, including an important strategic acquisition in the oncology space that we made subsequent to quarter- end. Raul will provide a more in-depth review of the quarterly financial results as well as our financial guidance for 2026, which we updated in today's press release. We will then open the call for your questions. Beginning with a review of our first quarter results. We reported total revenue of $381.9 million, up 7% year-over-year on a GAAP basis and up 5% year-over-year on a constant currency basis.
Our constant currency revenue results exceeded the high end of the expectations that we outlined on the Q4 2025 earnings call. First quarter constant currency growth was driven by 2.7% organic constant currency growth and contributions from our acquisitions of Biolife and the C2 CryoBalloon device, both of which exceeded the high end of our expectations. Our organic constant currency growth includes the impact of the strategic divestiture of our DualCap product line in February of 2026, which we discussed in our Q4 2025 call. Excluding divested revenue, our organic constant currency growth was 3.7% in the first quarter. With respect to the profitability performance in Q1, we delivered financial results that significantly exceeded expectations.
Our non-GAAP operating margin increased 47 basis points year-over-year to 19.7%, representing the highest first quarter operating margin in the company's history. The team delivered 9% growth in non-GAAP EPS, which exceeded the high end of expectations, and we generated $25 million of free cash flow, an increase of 26% year-over-year. We are pleased with the solid start to fiscal year 2026, and I want to thank our team members all around the world for their effort and commitment to our customers. We updated our guidance in today's press release to include the expected financial impacts from our acquisition of View Point Medical on April 1. Importantly, we remain confident in our team's ability to drive stable constant currency growth, improving profitability, and solid free cash flow this year.
Our organization is aligned around our priorities for 2026, specifically to drive strong execution around the globe. To successfully complete our continued growth initiatives program, which includes our previously disclosed financial targets for the three-year period ending December 31st, 2026. Turning now to a discussion on three key operating and strategic announcements we made since our last earnings call. First, on March 16th, we announced the U.S. commercial introduction of the Resilience Through-the-Scope, or TTS esophageal stent. The Resilience stent is indicated for treatment of esophageal fistulas and strictures caused by malignant tumors. Resilience is designed to demonstrate the greatest migration resistance amongst currently available TTS esophageal stents and facilitates physician control and accurate placement.
Resilience targets an attractive market opportunity in the United States, and we expect adoption and utilization of this differentiated product to contribute nicely to the growth in Merit's endoscopy platform in the coming years. Second, on April 1st, building upon our oncology platform, we announced the acquisition of View Point Medical for an aggregate transaction consideration of $140 million, of which $90 million was paid in cash at closing. View Point Medical is based in Carlsbad, California, and manufactures the OneMark detection imaging system and OneMark tissue markers. This unique ultrasound-enhanced technology offers an innovative solution to localize more lesions at the time of biopsy, representing an estimated 1.3 million procedures annually in the United States alone. This represents an expansion of the annual addressable procedure opportunity of approximately three times for our oncology business.
Merit has built a market leadership position in wire-free, non-radioactive breast localization procedures. Our leadership has been built upon our SCOUT platform, which utilizes the precision and accuracy of radar. The OneMark system is US FDA cleared for percutaneous placement in soft tissue tumors to mark biopsy sites or lesions. It consists of a surgical detection system and ultrasound-enhanced tissue markers. After placement, the tissue markers are designed to be visible across commonly used imaging modalities and engineered to minimize interference with future imaging studies. This acquisition expands our portfolio of therapeutic oncology products dedicated to the diagnosis and localization of breast and soft tissue tumors. The combination of SCOUT and OneMark provides physicians with localization options during the initial diagnostic biopsy, which may reduce the need for a separate procedure to mark the location of the tumor prior to surgery.
We believe this acquisition presents multiple strategic and financial positives. Importantly, this acquisition is consistent with our continued growth initiatives program. This acquisition represents another example of Merit selectively investing to expand our product portfolio in key strategic markets that leverage our existing commercial footprint. I want to highlight our new presentation of revenue, which we formally introduced in a Form 8-K filed on April 13th. As discussed on our Q4 call, Merit's new executive leadership team and I have been working through a comprehensive analysis of the business. It became clear during this process that we had an opportunity to streamline our internal planning and reporting processes with the goal of aligning how we think about, evaluate, and plan each of our underlying businesses. We also identified an opportunity to streamline how we talk about the business externally as well.
We believe there's significant value in aligning how we talk about the business both internally and externally, and we expect these changes to help the investment community not only better understand the composition of our business today, but also the underlying growth drivers of our business going forward. To that end, as disclosed in the Form 8-K on April 13 and reported in our earnings press release today, we are now reporting our revenue in two product categories, foundational and therapeutic. Foundational products are used primarily for access and enabling functions in vascular and other procedures. Merit's foundational products comprised about two-thirds of our total revenue in 2025, and sales increased at a 6% compound annual growth rate over the last three years. Therapeutic products are devices and systems that treat disease in a number of very large markets that together represent significant growth potential.
Merit's therapeutic products comprised about one-third of our total revenue in 2025, and sales increased at an 11% compound annual growth rate on an organic basis over the last three years. Given that we call on a wide variety of clinicians and our products are a part of so many procedures, we have solidified our new operating model internally around eight platforms: access, vascular intervention, procedural solutions, cardiac therapies, renal therapies, oncology, endoscopy, and OEM. The access and procedural solutions platforms are comprised entirely of foundational products. The vascular intervention and OEM platforms are comprised of both foundational and therapeutic products. Cardiac therapies, renal therapies, oncology, and endoscopy are comprised entirely of therapeutic products. In the Form 8-K, we shared four years of historical revenue in each of these platforms. To reiterate, going forward, we plan to report revenue results by foundational and therapeutic products.
In addition, we intend to continue to highlight additional color on the underlying drivers of growth within the underlying platforms. As I shared last quarter, each of our platforms is being co-led by a marketing lead and a research and development lead. Each team is comprised of cross-functional and cross-geographic members so that we have better alignment on product and commercial priorities, improved communication across functions and geographies, and a team who feels accountable for that platform globally. I am very pleased with how our teams are taking ownership, increasing communication, and thinking about how best to serve our customers in each area. I truly believe that focusing our efforts in this way will enable us to drive even greater growth within each one of these platforms in the years to come.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Raul for an in-depth review of our quarterly financial results and our updated financial guidance for 2026. Raul?
Thank you, Martha. I will start with a detailed review of our revenue results in the first quarter. Note, unless otherwise stated, all growth rates are approximated and presented on both a year-over-year and constant currency basis. First quarter total revenue increased $18.6 million, or 5%, exceeding the high- end of the expectations we outlined on our fourth quarter call. Excluding sales of acquired products, our total revenue growth on an organic constant currency basis was 2.7% at the high- end of our expectations. Excluding divested revenue, our organic constant currency growth was 3.7% in the first quarter.
By geography, our total revenue in Q1 was primarily driven by growth in the U.S., where sales increased $14.5 million, or 6.8%, and international sales increased $4.1 million, or 3%, both of which modestly exceeded the high end of our expectations in Q1. Turning to a review of our revenue results by product category. First quarter total revenue was driven by a $10.1 million, or 4%, increase in sales of foundational products and an $8.5 million, or 7%, increase in sales of therapeutic products. Including the contributions from acquired products of $6.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, sales of foundational and therapeutic products increased 1.5% and 5.2%, respectively, on an organic constant currency basis.
Organic growth in the foundational product category was driven primarily by our vascular intervention and access platforms, which offset year-over-year declines in sales of OEM and procedural solution products, the latter of which impacted by our divestiture of DualCap product line. Organic growth in the therapeutic product category was driven by strong growth in our cardiac therapies and endoscopy platforms and contributions from solid growth in our vascular intervention and oncology platforms, offsetting year-over-year sales declines in our OEM and renal therapies platforms. We were pleased with our first quarter total revenue results that exceeded the high end of our expectations, despite the notable headwinds to year-over-year revenue growth experienced in our OEM business in Q1. OEM sales declined 14% year-over-year in Q1, significantly lower than what was assumed in our guidance.
Sales to OEM customers outside the U.S. continued to see demand trends impacted by the macro environment, particularly in the APAC region and these headwinds were largely consistent with our expectations. OEM sales to U.S. customers were impacted by inventory destocking dynamics related to product line transfers to Tijuana, Mexico, as expected. That said, customer orders came in lower than expected, which we would characterize as transient or timing-based rather than a reflection of share loss. Our OEM business remains healthy despite the quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in growth rates. We continue to believe the appropriate normalized growth profile of our OEM business is in the mid to high single digits annually. Turning to a review of our P&L performance.
For the avoidance of doubt, unless otherwise noted, my commentary will focus on the company's non-GAAP results during the first quarter of 2026, and all growth rates are approximated and presented on a year-over-year basis. We have included reconciliations from our GAAP reported results to the most directly comparable non-GAAP item in our press release and presentation available on our website. Gross profit increased 7% in the first quarter. Our gross margin was 53.2%, down 20 basis points year-over-year, but notably stronger than our internal expectations. Q1 gross margin included a $4.6 million impact from tariffs compared to no impact in the prior year period, representing a 120 basis point impact to gross margin in the period. Operating expenses increased 5% in the first quarter.
The increase in operating expense was driven primarily by a $5.4 million or 5% increase in SG&A expense, and to a lesser extent, a $1.1 million or 5% increase in R&D expense compared to the prior year period. Total operating income in the first quarter increased $6.9 million or 10% from the prior year period to $75.3 million. Our operating margin was 19.7% compared to 19.3% in the prior year period, an increase of 47 basis points year-over-year. First quarter other expense net was $1.2 million compared to $1.7 million for the comparable period last year. The change in other expense net was driven primarily by gain loss on foreign exchange and higher interest income.
First quarter net income was $56.7 million or $0.94 per share compared to $52.9 million or $0.86 per share in the prior year period. First quarter net income and EPS exceeded the high end of our guidance range by $3.7 million and $0.07, respectively. Turning to a review of our balance sheet and financial condition. As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $488.1 million, total debt obligations of $747.5 million, and available borrowing capacity of approximately $697 million. Compared to cash and cash equivalents of $446.4 million, total debt obligations of $747.5 million, and available borrowing capacity of approximately $697 million as of December 31, 2025.
Our net leverage ratio as of March 31st was 1.6 times on an adjusted basis. The increase in cash and cash equivalents in the first quarter was driven by a combination of strong free cash flow generation of $24.7 million and $25.5 million of proceeds from our divestiture and sale of the DualCap product line, offset partially by $6.3 million in cash used for financing activities in the period. Subsequent to quarter- end, we acquired View Point Medical for an aggregate consideration of $140 million. Of that amount, $90 million was paid in cash at closing and two deferred payments of $25 million each are scheduled to be paid no later than 1st and 2nd anniversary of the closing date, respectively.
In addition to the favorable strategic rationale for this acquisition that Martha outlined earlier, the financial rationale for this transaction is compelling. While we expect the transaction to be $0.05 dilutive to our 2026 non-GAAP EPS for the 12 months ending December 31, 2027, the acquisition is projected to be accretive to our non-GAAP EPS. Longer term, we project this acquisition to be accretive to Merit's multi-year growth and profitability profile. Specifically, we project sales of View Point Medical's OneMark system to grow at least 20% per year, with 70% non-GAAP gross margins and non-GAAP operating margins above our company average. Turning to a review of our fiscal year 2026 financial guidance.
As reported in our earnings press release, we have updated our financial guidance for 2026 to reflect the projected contributions to our total revenue and impact on our non-GAAP EPS previously disclosed on February 24, 2026. Specifically, from the acquisition effective date of April 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026, the acquisition is projected to contribute revenue in the range of $2 million-$4 million and to dilute Merit's initial 2026 guidance for non-GAAP earnings per share by approximately $0.05. This non-GAAP EPS dilution includes approximately $2 million of lower interest income on cash balances used for the total purchase consideration and excludes approximately $5.3 million of non-cash and non-recurring transaction-related expenses.
For the 12 months ending December 31st, 2026, we now expect total GAAP net revenue growth in the range of 6.3%-7.8% year-over-year and 5.6%-7% year-over-year on a constant currency basis, excluding an expected 80 basis point tailwind, the GAAP growth from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. There are a few factors to consider when evaluating our projected constant currency revenue growth range for 2026, including, first, our constant currency growth range assumes sales of foundational products increase in the mid single digits year-over-year and sales of therapeutic products increase in the high single digits year-over-year.
Second, our total net revenue guidance for fiscal year 2026 now assumes inorganic revenue contributions in the range of approximately $17 million-$20 million, compared to $13 million-$15 million previously. This increase is an inorganic revenue expectation that is driven by the combination of $2 million-$4 million of View Point Medical revenue and stronger than expected contributions from our Biolife and C2 acquisitions in the first quarter. Excluding inorganic revenue, our 2026 guidance continues to reflect total net revenue growth on a constant currency organic basis in the range of approximately 4.5%-6%, year-over-year. Third, our total net revenue guidance for fiscal year 2026 continues to assume U.S. revenue from the sales of the WRAPSODY CIE of approximately $7 million. Fourth, our total net revenue guidance for fiscal year 2026 reflects the impact of our DualCap divestiture.
Product sales and royalty revenue for DualCap totaled approximately $20 million in 2025 and net of approximately $1.6 million of sales in Q1 2026. The divestiture represents an estimated year-over-year headwind of approximately 130 basis points to our total constant currency revenue growth in 2026. With respect to profitability guidance for 2026, we continue to expect non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in the range of $4.01-$4.15, up 5%-8%. Note, our non-GAAP EPS range reflects the $0.05 of dilution from the acquisition of Viewpoint Medical. Funded by the better-than-expected non-GAAP EPS results we delivered in the first quarter. All of the modeling considerations regarding our profitability and cash flow expectations for 2026 introduced on our fourth quarter call remain unchanged.
For avoidance of doubt, our 2026 non-GAAP EPS guidance continues to assume a 12-month tariff impact of approximately $15 million or $0.19 per share, compared to a $9 million or $0.12 per share realized during the last eight months of 2025. As a reminder, the expected 12-month tariff impact assumed in our 2026 non-GAAP EPS range was based on tariff policies in place prior to the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in late February. This continues to be an evolving situation. The ultimate impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision and subsequent new and/or additional tariffs or retaliatory actions or changes to tariffs on our business will depend on the timing, amount, scope, and nature of such tariffs, most of which are currently unknown.
We intend to review our 2026 financial guidance when we report our financial results for the three and six-month periods ending June 30th, 2026. We will provide an update on the estimated 12-month tariff impact and potential gains related to refunded tariff payments in prior periods. Finally, we would like to provide additional transparency related to our growth and profitability expectations for the second quarter of 2026. Specifically, we expect our total revenue in the range of $400 million-$410 million, representing a growth of 5%-7% year-over-year on a GAAP basis, and up approximately 4%-7% on a constant currency basis. Note, our second quarter constant currency sales growth expectations include inorganic revenue in the range of approximately $4 million-$4.5 million.
Excluding inorganic contributions, total revenue is expected to increase in the range of approximately 3%-5% on an organic constant currency basis. With respect to our profitability expectations for the second quarter of 2026, we expect non-GAAP operating margins in the range of approximately 18.7%-20.4% compared to 21.2% last year. non-GAAP EPS in the range of $0.90-$1.00 compared to $1.01 last year. With that, I will now turn the call back to Martha Aronson for closing comments.
Thanks, Raul. As you can hear, we continue to be on a nice trajectory to successfully complete the third and final year of CGI. I wanna commend the organization once again for staying focused on delivering these results while also closing a strategic acquisition on April 1st and embarking on our long-range strategy work. I want to add that when our extended leadership team spent several days kicking off our long-range strategy work during the quarter, we had very robust conversations about each platform, and there was tremendous energy around this work. We also recommitted ourselves to ensuring that our infrastructure is solid so that we can continue to scale our business globally. As I've said before, we will do that with both organic product development alongside disciplined tuck-in acquisitions focused on our strategic platforms.
Finally, as I've continued my global travels and spend time with customers, investors, and employees, I continue to be inspired and excited about the future of Merit Medical. Operator, we would now like to open the line for questions.
Thank you. If you'd like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star one one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. We do ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask additional questions, we invite you to add yourself to the queue again by pressing star one one. Our first question will come from Michael Petusky of Barrington Research. Your line is open.
Hi. Good evening. Nice result. I guess there wasn't much in the way other than, I guess, the reaffirmed guide on WRAPSODY. Is there, Martha, are there any updates you wanna share there, whether it's anecdotal or more quantitative, just on early days progress? Thanks.
Yeah. Thanks very much, Mike. Just to clarify, you're asking about WRAPSODY?
Yes.
Yeah. Yeah. No, we're real pleased with how WRAPSODY is going. Again, just to remind folks, you know, we did a bit of a reset, if you will, on how we're approaching our go-to-market strategy with WRAPSODY. We really instituted that toward the end of last year. I'd say at this point, we're very pleased with how we're doing. We've given, I think, our previous guidance or our revised guidance in 2026 of $7 million for WRAPSODY for the fiscal year, and we're tracking, we're tracking right on that.
Okay. Great. I'm not sure who this is for, but just curious about, is there a formal process? Are you guys seeking refunds in terms of the tariffs that you had to pay last year and the first part of this year? If so, how does that process work? Thanks.
Yeah. Maybe, I'll just kind of give a guidance overview if you don't mind, Mike, you know, 'cause there's a lot of, you know, moving parts to this. As a reminder, you know, for our 2026 guidance, we have left it unchanged essentially from what we did in the first quarter, which is, you know, we've got $15 million that's baked into our guidance for 2026 versus the $9 million that we had in 2025.
That's unchanged, you know, since the U.S. Supreme Court decision. I think there's still, you know, a potential for the administration to challenge that, I believe through May. I think, you know, we'll reevaluate that as part of our second quarter kind of reevaluation. And we'll discuss, you know, that further, I think, you know, after the second quarter once we kind of get a little, you know, I guess, on firmer ground, right? It's a moving target. There's also the Section 232 stuff that's hanging out there. You know.
[crosstalk]
[crosstalk] It's okay. Go ahead.
I was just gonna say, have you guys filed it? Like, is there paperwork to file to seek refunds, at this point for you guys or no?
Yes. We have started the process of reimbursement. Like I said, though, I think the challenge is that the administration can still challenge, you know, the reimbursement through May. I think, you know, from our perspective, we've started the process of filing and have essentially filed for the majority of that. I think we'll have an update, hopefully, you know, on our second quarter call as to how that, you know, shakes out. You know, feeling optimistic, I would say. You know, if things stay as they are today, I definitely think, you know, the $15 million, you know, would come down.
Okay. Very good. Thanks, guys.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Bednar of Piper Sandler. Your line is open.
Hey, good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions and nice start to the year here. I wanted to start first on Viewpoint, the recent deal. It's a pretty sizable revenue contribution step up from this year to next. Maybe just if you could help us out with how you see this coming together, what's supporting that growth ramp going from $2 million-$4 million in revenue this year up to $14 million-$16 million next year. Should we think about that 20% growth rate you referenced starting in 2028, you know, building on that $14 million-$16 million? I guess looped in here, just any considerations around synergies that could be realized with respect to that SCOUT platform.
Yeah. Thanks, Jason. Appreciate the question. A couple comments on that, if you will. I mean, first of all, I mean, I'm just gonna kinda take a step back, if you will, on oncology, right? It's about a $100 million platform for us, and it, you know, it's been growing very nicely, and yet it's been a one product, pretty much a one product platform. We have been looking for a while at ways to try to add to that platform because we have an outstanding field organization and we wanted to get some additional products in their hands. If you think about the breast cancer market, right, and particularly you have to go to the biopsy phase, right, in terms of the whole phase, right? Somebody has a mammogram where something's seen.
In the U.S. alone, there's 1.6 million breast biopsies that are done each year. For SCOUT, the product that we've had for a period of time now, the applicable market's been about 300,000 of those procedures each year. With the addition of OneMark, you actually expand the market 3-4 times because now that other 1.3 million breast biopsies that are done tend to be done for lower risk patients. The SCOUT tends to be used for higher risk patients. We're really just seeing a terrific market expansion opportunity here and it's really then just comes down to a physician choice about whether they'd rather use radar technology or ultrasound technology. We are just, we're super excited about that.
I'll just say, I think the other really important thing about this is that both of these approaches happen at the time of biopsy, whereas many of the other, you know, if you don't do something at a time of biopsy, a patient may have to go through an additional localization procedure before their surgery. We're really excited about what it means for patients. You know, I think again, you know, breast cancer grows about 4% a year, and actually the wire-free localization market where we play is growing at about 13% a year. I think when you ask about our confidence in the future growth rates, we feel good about that.
I'll add, Jason, you know, at the midpoint of our 2027 guide, you know, which was around $15 million, you can definitely tack on the 20%, you know, that we called out. On the synergies, just as a just to be clear, you know, in the guide for 2027, on a full year basis, it is accretive, you know, both on the top line and the bottom line with nice strong gross margins at 70%. We're really excited about it.
Okay. No, thank you for all that. That was super helpful and very in-depth. Got a good asset on your hands. I wanna pivot to the OEM part of the business. I appreciate all the extra color in the prepared remarks, Raul. I heard you on the one key performance and the normalized growth profile for OEM, I guess kind of the genesis of the question here is, can you say that the worst is behind you for OEM? Does that performance get sequentially better in 2Q? Does growth return in the second part of this year, second half of this year? Bigger picture on OEM, Martha, you know, we've obviously seen you take some actions on portfolio management at Merit.
You know, how do you think about the value OEM provides to Merit versus maybe what you could potentially realize through strategic moves like some of the actions we've seen across other med- tech OEM players here the last several months?
Sure. I'll take the last part of the question first, Jason, if you don't mind. I think just to kind of level set people on what our OEM business is, you know, we essentially sell capacity, right? I would say that we're different than other OEM, you know, companies out there, you know, we're not a contract manufacturer. We are selling our own products. Divesting of that just doesn't really work, right? We'd end up with a bunch of extra capacity. Having said that, you know, we love our OEM business. It's a great asset. Our OEM business, you know, remains healthy, despite the quarter-to-quarter fluctuations.
I know you guys find that frustrating. I think, you know, as we see the visibility, specifically, you know, we're getting excited about what we can do there. We continue to believe, you know, the appropriate kind of normalized growth profile is in the mid to high single- digits. I think, you know, we're starting to see orders for Q2. That gives us a lot of confidence that I think, you know, we are gonna be in that mid, at the very least, I always kind of like to point to the low end. You guys know how I work. You know, we should be at the very least at that mid single digits growth profile that I just talked about. Excited about, you know, to see how the quarter goes, but early start is looking really good.
Good. Sorry, just to clarify, you're saying mid-singles is how you're seeing 2Q come together, mid-single digit growth for OEM?
That's right.
Okay, perfect. Thanks so much.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Sam Eiber of BTIG. Your line is open.
Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions here. Maybe I can follow up on some of the supply dynamics in the cardiac business that was called out in the prior quarter. Just curious to get an update on how that's shaking out here, and then I'll have a quick follow-up.
Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, we continue to, you know, be on track. I think, you know, maybe to kind of walk, you know, through that issue, right? When we initially had our first quarter or, sorry, fourth quarter call, it was a supply chain issue that, you know, unfortunately did turn into a recall. I'm sure, you know, a lot of you guys saw the notice go out. You know, again, you know, from a financial perspective, you know, it's immaterial to our, you know, 2026 financial results. We continue to be on track to, you know, to have this, you know, product back on the market.
It's unfortunate, you know, that, you know, this, you know, came to this. just to kind of highlight it, you know, it's a, it's a class one recall, but we haven't had any of those, you know, since 2017. just to clarify, you know, this was in renal, right? just for clarity, Sam.
Okay, that's helpful. Maybe just a quick follow-up on, you know, some of the geopolitical issues we're seeing out of the Middle East. Just wondering if you're able to help, I guess, quantify or think through, you know, any kind of impact on the revenue line and then the input costs, whether it's freight oil, you know, how should we be thinking about that over the course over the rest of the year? Thanks for taking the questions.
Yeah. I mean, on the positive, you know, side, I mean, we have yet to receive any price increases from our vendors. We are seeing fuel surcharges. I think those are pretty typical. We, you know, we usually see those at least once a year, you know, as gas prices fluctuate, so that's nothing that, you know, we're used to dealing with that. You know, I would say that, you know, right now what we're seeing, everything's manageable. You know, I guess if the issue continues, I think we'll have to reevaluate that. As of now, you know, we feel like we can overcome whatever is coming our way.
The other thing too, that I'll call out is, you know, on the sales side, right, I, you know, we continue to get orders, you know, from the Middle East, you know, region. We did leave about $1.5 million of revenue on the table, from shippers that just weren't able to come and pick the product up and deliver it. You know, we are seeing an impact. I would say that it's very manageable. You know, again, we continue to feel really optimistic about the guidance that we, that we put out there for 2026.
Thank you. Our next question comes from David Rescott of R.W. Baird. Your line is open.
Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Two from us, I'll ask them both upfront. I heard some of the commentary around OEM as it relates to the quarter and Q2 and the guide for the year. I recall that there is some Asia Pac impact in there in general. Curious on if you could provide any color just around, you know, what the assumptions are for China and Asia Pac at this point, and more broad strokes on how that is shaking out versus, you know, contribution from that region in the prior year at least.
Thinking more on the operating margin side, I believe the results that you put up were, you know, a little bit better than we had expected on the operating margin front, lower OpEx growth. It seemed to be the case, better gross margin. Can maybe you help us think about how you're thinking about some of the controls on the OpEx side through the rest of the year? I believe you commented on gross margins already, but would be curious around any of the underlying assumptions you have for better than expected operating margins through the year. Thank you.
Yeah. Maybe I'll just hit on the APAC region, right? I mean, I think, on the OEM side, that's where you started, you know, specific to kind of the APAC region. You know, that was essentially in line with our expectations. APAC as a whole, you know, was, you know, up 1% on a constant currency in Q1, which was, you know, for us, you know, it was, you know, versus the high end of our guidance. You know, China sales increased by about 2% year-over-year on a constant currency in Q1, essentially in line with our expectations. VBP impact was, you know, I would say modestly better than expected.
As far as China, I think we continue to expect, I would say low single digits, you know, for 2026, you know, as we continue to deal with volume-based purchasing. Moving on to, you know, kind of the operating expense side of things. Look, I mean, I think when, you know, obviously we were expecting a lower gross margin. You know, we controlled operating expenses and then with the conflict. As that came out, we really kind of, you know, talked to the executive team about, you know, being in control of those operating expenses. I think they did a really good job of doing that.
you know, we obviously let that flow through to the bottom line with, you know, $0.11 beat and a much better operating margin than we had initially indicated on the fourth quarter call. you know, one of the nice things is that we were able to offset the $0.05 dilution of View Point and essentially increased our EPS guide, you know, to cover for that. Again, I, you know, overall, I think the P&L was off to a really good, you know, start, strong start for Q1. We beat, you know, on the revenue side, you know, by, you know, over $4 million. Gross margin was better than anticipated. We controlled operating expenses.
That gives us a lot of confidence, you know, as we head into the rest of the year and really confident in the full year operating margin guide, and obviously focused on our CGI targets.
David, I might just throw in one comment if I could. I mean, you know, hats go off to Raul and Travis and our finance team. I think one of the things we've been working on is a number of our processes across the company and getting our finance partners involved in that earlier in the process. I just think, you know, we're doing our best to ensure discipline, I'd say, throughout the organization when it comes to spend. Again, just a hats off to our finance team partnering up with all of our, you know, the engineering staff, our operations team, et cetera.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Aidan Leahy of Bank of America. Your line is open.
Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Two for me on OneMark. When you did the deal, how much were you factoring in it being complementary versus cannibalistic to SCOUT? I know you said it's a physician preference. Is this a move that can open up broader accounts? Would some accounts have both systems? Do you think there are any impact on SCOUT sales during the inorganic period that could impact growth?
Yeah. Thanks for the question. We really do think this is a market expansion play, right? I mean, you know, obviously there could be a handful of accounts. As you said, we could have a situation where some have both, there could be some where someone does choose one over the other. There really is an opportunity, frankly. It's a little bit of a we call it a better and a best offering, if you will. There's really an opportunity to target the accounts very specifically, which our team has done a great job already, in, you know, in being ready to go do that, so that we really see it as a total expansion of that time at biopsy, you know, localization market.
Got it. Really helpful. Then I think we saw OneMark was actually running a trial that was head-to-head with SCOUT. Obviously, now that both products are yours, do the outcomes of that trial change the strategy with SCOUT, depending on if it goes one way or the other, and what are the plans there?
No, again, I mean, you know, I just literally got off the phone earlier today with one of the team members from OneMark. I mean, this group is super excited to be part of Merit. Merit's super excited to have them as, you know, part of our team. There's a major, you know, congress happening literally starting today, you know, the Society for Breast Surgeons, and there was a training with fellows earlier today. Literally what the team was reporting back to me is how it really is a physician preference kind of a thing.
Some people are just more sort of audible, and they like, you know, the radar and hearing it, and then frankly, others say, you know, being able to see it visually, they prefer that approach. We're just excited to have, you know, this enhanced product offering across the portfolio and as we said, just a great add to the Merit Oncology platform.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from James Sidoti of Sidoti & Company. Your line is open.
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. If I heard you correctly, with gross margin, you were able to maintain that, keep that basically flat despite about $5 million of tariff expense. What drove that? Was that a mix issue, or can you give us some more color on that?
Yeah. It was essentially 100 basis point impact, or 120 basis point impact to our gross margin, the tariffs were. Again, hats off to our sales force on focusing on selling the right product at the right price. Obviously we have some acquisitions too that are helping us, and that's part of that mix component. We continue to focus on the throw the kitchen sink approach at the gross margin. I think the conflict in the Middle East is exactly why we do that.
You know, there's surcharges that are coming that we were still over to, you know, being able to overcome. You know, our operations group is doing everything they can to try and maintain, you know, or improve costs in a really challenging environment. You know, I would say it's a little bit of everything, Jim, but, you know, there is a mix component that's helping us. Again, I think we've done a really good job over the last, you know, under FFG and CGI on really focusing on the right products. You know, the, you know, we did divest of the DualCap. You know, that was a very low gross margin product and that's helping also. Again, we're hyper-focused on those CGI goals.
You know, as you guys know, gross margin is an important, you know, contributor to operating margin, which is why we focus on it so much.
Inventory was up about $20 million in the quarter. Can you explain that?
Yeah. I mean, the, you know, again, there's, you know, acquisitions that are, you know, that have taken place, and we're building out those inventories. I think, you know, there's certain areas that we were a little low in. As you guys recall over the last year in our endoscopy segment, we dealt with a little bit of, you know, supply chain issues, so getting that, you know, to a healthy, you know, point. Same with our oncology business. I would say same within our cardiac and renal therapies. You know, those are all areas that, you know, had really strong sales that, you know, we essentially getting the safety levels, you know, to an area that we feel comfortable with.
You know, you're also in an environment right now where, you know, you start to kind of look at the supply chain, just making sure that you're covered, just given the, you know, the performance of the company that we expect. Just making sure our safety stocks are at the right level.
All right. If I can, I'm gonna sneak one more in. Can you just tell us what the distribution looks like for the OneMark system prior to the acquisition and how many people will be selling it now that it's a Merit product?
Well, James, we don't share exactly how big our sales organizations are. I mean, Viewpoint was certainly a smaller organization. So again, it'll fold really nicely into our team, as I said, who's really excited to have their Viewpoint colleagues join them. It's not, I'll say this, it's not a major expansion of our, of our sort of, you know, commercial footprint. I would say the energy behind it will certainly make up for that.
Okay, the big jump to revenue in 2027, that's not because of increased distribution. You think that's because of increased product awareness?
Correct. It's increased product awareness, and it's being able to have options as you go into each and every account, and it's some really excellent account planning and targeting that our team is undertaking.
All right. Thank you.
Thanks, Jim.
Thank you. Our next question comes from John Young of Canaccord. Your line is open.
Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question, and congratulations on the quarter. Martha, I just wanted to ask, you know, when you came into the seat, just there was an emphasis on OUS growth of your background. Any updates on the progress or changes that you've made there? I know in the script you spoke about some alignment changes. Has compensation incentives changed at all for the reps?
No. As we go into 2026, there have not been any significant comp changes for our reps. I mean, I will say, you know, you've heard Raul talk about our gross margin improvement. I would say over the last several years, this organization has done a really nice job, you know, making sure our team knows which products to keep focused on. We really are pushing a bit more emphasis on some of our higher margin products. There, you know, there's certainly that. I would just say, you know, in general, right? I mean, we do have about 40% of our revenue is outside the U.S.
again, as you heard, our international teams continue to do a really nice job for us. so I'm quite pleased with that.
Great. Thanks. Then just looking perhaps for any additional color on the endoscopy segment and any progress that you guys made in the quarter on the integration and training of that sales force. Thanks again for taking the questions.
Yeah. You know, we're really excited about the endoscopy platform, right? I mean, we brought in, you know, the C2 CryoBalloon acquisition, which is so far, you know, doing better than our high-end expectations. We're really pleased about that. As you probably saw, we announced a new product, and we mentioned it in the script, right? The Resilience product, which is this Through-the-Scope esophageal stent. This is a really nice market for us. It's, it's sub $100 million, you know, size in terms of market. Again, that's, you know, in the world of Merit Medical, that's a really nice market sort of space for us.
This is a great stent, and it's actually because physicians get to, you know, put it in through a scope, they feel like they have a lot more control and accurate placement. Most importantly, what the feedback we've gotten initially is that it's not moving once it's there. Migration has really been an issue with the number of the stents that are out there in that market. Again, we're just, we're really excited about the opportunity for Resilience, and frankly, the endoscopy business in general. In fact, next week I'll be at Digestive Disease Week with the team, which is one of their big shows, more on the GERD side of things. Again, all across endoscopy, we're very pleased.
Yeah. Maybe I'll add a little color. You know, if, you know, as hopefully you guys saw last year, I think they, you know, our endoscopy team just got better every quarter and, you know, as they integrated and learned how to sell, you know, kinda both bags essentially. You know, Q1 was mid-teen, you know, growth. You know, really strong performance by them and, you know, they're excited about what they're doing, so, and which makes us excited about, you know, the potential that they have.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Jayson Bedford of Raymond James. Your line is open.
Hey, Raul. Hey, Martha. It's Zachary Gold for Jayson Bedford here. Thanks for taking the question. You guys have talked about being open to deals that are somewhat larger than historical tuck-ins. You know, of course, we saw the View Point deal. As you look at the pipeline, can you remind us what those key areas are for the next deal? Kind of in terms of sizing, you know, would you say View Point is a good proxy for deal characteristics and size in terms of just helping us level set expectations on acquisitions? Thank you.
Yeah, thanks. We appreciate the question. Look, I mean, I think, you know, doing deals is not something where you get to say, I wanna do something of exactly this size, you know, at this time to add precisely to this particular platform. That would be great, right? That would be a lovely world in which to live. Unfortunately, you know, that's not, that's not reality. You know, we're not gonna put sort of a number around, you know, size of deal, if you will. You know, as I said, we're looking at a lot of things. This company has grown a lot through acquisition. We plan to continue to do that. Again, I think it's really important to think of it in terms of tuck-ins or bolt-ons. Nothing transformational.
Every deal has to have a lot of strategic fit. You know, as we're talking about, when we look at these platforms, you know, part of what's exciting about this platform structure that we're using is I am looking to each platform to have a lot of conviction around any proposed deal, right? Because they're gonna own it, and that's the way, you know, we're building up these various business lines. It's really critical that they believe in it, and they have done the work and the analysis. We do a lot of that here kind of at corporate as well, right? That's the way we're really thinking about acquisitions going forward. It's gotta be strategic, and then it's gotta, you know, fit certain financial metrics that we've got in place as well.
Certainly, being margin accretive would be one of them.
Okay. That makes sense. Appreciate that color there. If I can ask a second one here. Just curious on that Medtronic distribution deal you guys did during the quarter. Is there any stocking tied to that? Like, yeah. Is there stocking tied to that?
Yeah
material impact for you guys on growth that comes from this agreement?
There is a, you know, obviously, you know, they're gonna gear up, you know, and we're not gonna give details. I mean, this is, you know. It's not in, you know, our practice to, you know, to talk about our customers, you know, you know, what they're gonna do and, you know, how they're gonna launch. I would just say that we're really excited for our OEM division. You know, I think they've done a good job of working with, you know, with our OEM partners and customers on finding opportunity, and this happens to be one of them.
It is built into our, into our guidance for the year, which again gives us a high level of confidence in that, you know, mid-single-digit, you know, growth that we expect out of OEM. You know, I think, you know, we're excited for them, you know, and I know there's been a lot of comments around OEM. I can tell you that, again, we have a high level of confidence in their performance for the rest of the year.
Thank you.
Yeah, I mean, it's actually, it's just a really good example, right? I mean, when we say OEM is lumpy, you know, this is. This is kind of a good example of it, right? I mean, as you saw, you know, Medtronic put out a press release on it, right? I mean, we have a relationship with them. They've been an OEM customer, as they shared in their press release. You know, these things, you know, they ebb and flow a little bit, right? I think as Raul said, though, we're very excited and this definitely is a factor in us, you know, in our gaining confidence on our OEM platform for this fiscal year.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Matson of Needham & Company. Your line is open.
Yeah, thanks. I just want to ask one on capital allocation. I mean, I understand your focus on M&A and that's kind of been the, the priority, but the stock is pretty beaten up, pretty cheap here. You know, would you consider doing a share repurchase at all?
Look, I think, you know, obviously that's a, that's a board-level decision. You know, and I, I don't wanna speak on their behalf. You know, I think for now, you know, with our net leverage ratio of 1.6, you know, a lot of opportunity out there from an M&A perspective. We continue to, I think, you know, conserve cash. We continue to generate strong free cash flow. As you guys saw, you know, almost approximately $25 million for the first quarter, you know, which was a really strong increase over, you know, prior Q1 of 2025. For now, we're just focused on CGI. We're focused on our free cash flow goals. You know, we are focused on delivering, you know, long-term sustainable growth.
Okay. Got it. I'll leave it there. Thanks.
Yep.
Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn it back to Martha Aronson for closing remarks.
Well, look, just wanna say thanks, everybody. Appreciate you dialing in today. As I said, pleased with our strong start to 2026. As I said, feel good about tracking nicely to our CGI goals. Most importantly, I do wanna thank our team who's so committed to helping patients all around the world. Again, thanks everybody for joining us today.
This concludes our conference call for today. Thank you for your participation.