Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Murphy Oil Corporation Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all lines are in a listen only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session. This call is being recorded on Thursday, August 8, 2019. And I would now like to turn the conference over to Kelly Whitley, Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications.
Please go ahead.
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our Q2 earnings call today. With me are Roger Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer David Looney, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mike McFadden, Executive Vice President, Offshore and Eric Hambly, Executive Vice President, Onshore. Please refer to the informational slides we have placed on the Investor Relations section of our website as you follow along with our webcast today. Throughout today's call, production numbers, reserves and financial amounts are adjusted to exclude the non controlling interest in the Gulf of Mexico. Since divesting our Malaysia portfolio, please note these assets are characterized as discontinued operations.
Slide 1. Additionally, please keep in mind that some of the comments made during this call will be considered forward looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. As such, no assurances can be given that these events will occur or that the projections will be attained. A variety of factors exist that may cause actual results to differ. For further discussion of risk factors, see Murphy's 2018 Annual Report on Form 10 ks on file with the SEC.
Murphy takes no duty to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements. I will now turn the call over to Roger Jenkins. Roger?
Thank you, Kelly. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for listening to our call today. First half of the year was extremely busy at Murphy as we continue to simplify and transform our company following the close of the LLOG and Malaysia transactions. Our 2nd quarter results clearly illustrate our commitment to be an oil weighted company with production from our U. S.
Onshore and North American offshore assets, generating robust realized prices leading to continued free cash flow. Production from continuing operations averaged 159,000 equivalents per day in the 2nd quarter, 67% liquids and more importantly 61% oil or more than 94,000 barrels of oil per day with only 1 month of the LLOG assets contributing to our business. We also exceeded our production guidance by 5,500 barrel oil equivalents per day. Our U. S.
Onshore production was 44,000 equivalents per day with 74% oil. This represents more than a 23% increase in production over the Q1 as we as our well execution is on track. Our North American offshore production averaged 65,000 equivalents per day with 87% oil. This includes 8,800 barrels of oil equivalent per day from our newly acquired Gulf of Mexico assets above our guidance of 7,600 barrels equivalent per day as our new Gulf of Mexico asset base continues to perform. We returned $342,000,000 to shareholders in the 2nd quarter, including a $300,000,000 share repurchase.
Subsequent to quarter end, we received over $2,000,000,000 in proceeds from the Malaysia sale and used the funds to repay $1,900,000,000 of debt incurred from our 2 Gulf of Mexico acquisitions, along with further increasing cash on our balance sheet. Over the past several months, we've made tremendous strides in transforming our company. We've quickly moved to sanction new projects within our expanded Gulf of Mexico portfolio, well as drilling a successful development well at Dalmatian that we expect to bring online in the Q4. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. David Looney, to give a financial update.
Thank you, Roger, and good morning, everyone. Starting with Slide 3, for the Q2, Murphy generated net income of $92,300,000 or $0.54 per diluted share, with adjusted income of $35,700,000 or 0 point $1 per diluted share. These results exclude the non controlling interest or NCI related to our MP GOM business and reflect our Malaysia business as discontinued operations. Similarly, all of the balance sheet accounts related to the Malaysian business are rolled up into 1 of 2 accounts, either assets or liabilities held for sale. Lastly, the cash flow statement excludes the Malaysian operations until you get to the very bottom of the statement where all such cash flows are covered in the section titled Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations.
In addition to the NCI and discontinued operations treatment, we had several one off items in the quarter totaling over $57,000,000 pretax. These included $15,000,000 in non cash mark to market adjustments of our potential contingent payment liabilities, dollars 8,000,000 in transaction costs related to our recent acquisitions and divestitures, a $51,000,000 non cash mark to market gain on crude oil derivative contracts and a $13,000,000 credit associated with tax reform in the province of Alberta. Slide 4. We once again generated free cash flow of approximately $63,000,000 more than our CapEx in the quarter, which benefited from a $93,000,000 working capital benefit. This working capital shift essentially represented the unwinding of a working capital drain we experienced in the Q1 immediately after taking over the MP GOM operations.
It is worth noting that for the 6 months year to date, our cash flow from operations after adjusting for working capital changes exceeded CapEx by $15,000,000 Given the size of the two transactions we recently closed and the ultimate classification of all of our Malaysian cash generation as discontinued operations, the fact that we were able to once again generate positive free cash flow during this period is a strong testament to the fact that Murphy takes free cash flow generation very seriously. Other cash flow adjustments for the quarter include approximately $22,000,000 of non cash long term compensation, as well as an additional cash inflow of approximately $20,000,000 in cash proceeds for the sale of non core Midland Basin acreage in Dawson County. Most importantly, subsequent to quarter end, we repaid $1,900,000,000 of debt on the balance sheet, bringing our credit facility borrowings to 0. Combined with our cash, this results in available liquidity of more than $2,000,000,000 Lastly, in order to partially protect our increasing exposure to oil prices resulting from our greatly expanded Gulf of Mexico portfolio, Subsequent to quarter end, we entered into a series of hedges at the WTI level for the remainder of 2019 and
all of
2020. In total, we now have hedged Via Swaps 23,000 barrels per day for August 1 to December 31 this year and 24,000 barrels per day for calendar 2020 at prices exceeding $63 for the rest of this year and approaching $60 for 2020. On Slide 5, this is how we'd like investors to think about our new assets and the high margins they're able to generate. Murphy is really a premium to WTI company now with the majority of our operations in the Eagle Ford Shale and Gulf of Mexico near Gulf Coast markets with existing infrastructure. This slide illustrates the 2nd quarter oil sales by percent and what types of markets they're selling into, such as Mars, Brent, Anew, Magellan East Houston or MEH that has largely replaced LLS in many contracts.
All have premium differentials over WTI. And while there might be some softening over the next few quarters, we still expect each of these barrels to trade at a premium to WTI, Especially when you take our newest offshore assets, which are very valuable from an API oil quality perspective, we expect to once again realize premium prices going forward. On a combined basis, our portfolio of oil assets realized over $63 per barrel post all transportation adjustments as compared to WTI at almost $60 At an asset level, our Eagle Ford Shale is able to generate an EBITDA per BOE over $35 and our North American offshore assets generate an impressive $38 EBITDA per BOE. With that, I'll turn it back over to Roger.
Thank you, David. As previously stated, we produced 159,000 equivalents in the quarter and exceeded guidance by 4%. All our operated assets continue to perform very well as we experienced lower downtime in offshore assets, especially in our recently purchased fields and better online execution across our onshore assets. On Slide 7, Murphy has a long history of supporting shareholders and we continue to do so over the past 10 years. We've returned over $3,800,000,000 to shareholders and have not issued equity.
In the 2nd quarter, we repurchased $300,000,000 or roughly 7% of our outstanding shares, which equates to purchasing our proven barrels for only $9.75 per BOE. We still have $200,000,000 remaining under our board authorization, which expires at year end 2020. We will continue to be opportunistic when repurchasing shares going forward. With recent success and free cash flow generation returns to shareholders since the price collapse of late 2015, we're one of only 6 peers who actually have free cash flow yield and have a history of not overspending our cash flows. During this time, we're the leading company in the peer group when dividends and buybacks are added together, net of issuances of which we have none, are considered.
We move forward now to Slide 9. In the Q2, we brought on 35 operated wells, 23 of which are in Karnes, 12 in Tilden. As completion efficiencies led to advancing our 2019 drilling program, the Tilden wells, which were scheduled to come online in the Q3, were actually brought online in the Q2. Overall, we expect to bring 91 wells online for the year and relatively equal division between Karnes, Tilden and Catarina. Our oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale increased by 28% over quarter 1, which is we feel is an outstanding benchmark for us and as we anticipate a near 7,000 barrel equivalent add of production increase for quarter 3 over quarter 1 over quarter 2 rather in this asset.
Slide 10. In further detail, our Q2 Eagle Ford Shale wells performance have been strong in both Karnes and Tilden with recent Tilden wells are the best we've ever drilled in this area. This quarter we drilled all three zones, Austin Chalk, the upper, the lower Eagle Ford Shale with average oil results exceeding type curves. Importantly, we achieved average IP30 rates across all three zones in Karnes or approximately 1200 equivalents per day with 90% liquids content. The Tilden wells are important because we've applied our latest completion techniques for the first time in this area.
Our Central Tildon assets specifically align with the robust performance of our Karnes wells and have achieved significant IP30 rates averaging 13 70 barrels equivalent per day with 92% liquid content. We're encouraged by recent well results and excited for the future development of this acreage. Slide 11. In the Kaybob Duvernayr asset continue to perform well as we brought online 6 wells for the quarter across our Kaybob North and Two Creeks acreage. The initial volumes have proven strong with facility constrained IP30 rates of more than 1,000 barrel equivalents per day in Kaybob North and 7.50 barrels equivalent per day in 2 creeks.
We have also closed a cashless acreage swap in Kaybob East, thereby gaining approximately 20,000 contiguous gross acres in exchange for only 5,800 non core acres in another area. Following quarter end, the 3 wells in the Seminyon area resumed production after third party midstream spec constraint prevented them from flowing to sales in the first half of the year. Going forward, our focus for the remainder of the year is on acreage retention with drilling 13 wells are scheduled to come online in 2020. Slide 12. Our Tupper Montney wells continue to deliver steady performance, added 5 wells in the quarter and highlight the new volumes trend in line with our 18 Bcf per well type curves.
Our price mitigation strategy continues to be successful as we realize 2nd quarter pricing of $1.82 per Mcf Canadian, excluding transportation compared to an AECO price of $1.03 Mcf. This attribute to our excellent marketing team, which remains focused on diversifying our price exposure through hedges and off AECO sales. Slide 14. We're pleased with our expanding Gulf of Mexico portfolio and after completing 2 major transaction, Murphy is now the 5th largest producer in the region. We successfully drilled a development well at Dalmatian that we plan to bring online in the 4th quarter with a growth rate of more than 6,000 equivalents per day.
The well has very robust returns as with any nearby infrastructure tieback in the Gulf of Mexico. We drilled a successful well at Hoff Park 2. We encountered oil in 3 zones. The well has just completed logging and the evaluation results are ongoing. While we discover resources that can easily be produced to our nearby Murphy operated Delta House facility, we unfortunately found volumes below our mean projection for the well.
Slide 15. In the Gulf of Mexico, we have a long runway of higher rate of return projects that will provide production and cash flow for several years to come. Our Board sanctioned 3 of these key projects in June. One of the projects is a Kings Key floating production system, which will host the production from 2 recently purchased fields in the LLOG transaction, as well as our recently sanctioned Samurai development. King's Key is being constructed in Korea with 1st steel cut last month.
Have 50% working interest in the production system and we are currently analyzing our options to sell down a portion of this facility as it is highly sought after in the midstream asset market. The facility will be designed to capture 3rd party volumes as well for additional cash flow and tariffs. We expect to flow Samurai development and the Khaleesi Moormont fields to the facility with first oil anticipated in the first half of twenty twenty two. Slide 16, our Board sanctioned 2 developments at Khaleesi, Mooremont and Samurai's well, which was successfully drilled by Samurai, which was successfully drilled by Murphy in 2018, Khaleesi Mormont are 2 adjacent fields that we acquired from LLOG. Khaleesi Mormont is a 7 well development project of which 4 of the wells are previously drilled encased with a total of 6 wellbore penetrations previously drilled.
We'll invest approximately $200,000,000 over 4 years with first oil in the first half of twenty twenty two. The gross resource is 165,000,000 barrels equivalent with 90% liquids and we expect it will produce for the next 20 years generating a full cycle rate of return of more than 30%. The reserves have been confirmed by 2 third party audit firms. The 3rd project will start in the second half of twenty nineteen as a multi well development at Samurai, which further benefits from our Gulf of Mexico acquisition by achieving synergy being located less than 10 miles from the Colisey, Mooremont and Kings Key facility. The proximity to now Murphy owned and operated facility will not only enhances the economics, but increases the recoverable resources net to Murphy.
We expect several decades of production in this development as well and a project full cycle rate of return of over 35%. We're providing a 10 years of disclosure for all three projects to clearly illustrate the timing of spend and the long runway of production and cash flows following the initial investments. Slide 17. We've laid out our upcoming short cycle capital projects through 2021 in the Gulf of Mexico along with their spending requirements and associated production gains to highlight the returns of our new asset base. Overall, we generate nearly 12,000 barrels equivalent per day from this work and additional volumes by 2021 upon completion of the 6 projects, which include single wells and workovers and generate an average IRR of more than 80%.
This further illustrates a significant runway of long term growth provided by the Gulf of Mexico business with excellent returns. Slide 19. As a review of production, we need to keep in mind that these volumes are from continuing operations net to Murphy unless otherwise noted. As we look to the Q3, we expect production to be 192,000 to 196,000 equivalents per day, of which approximately 118,000 barrels will be oil. This is a real engine behind our new cash flow generating ability.
Our full year production is forecasted to range between 174,000 to 178,000 barrels equivalent per day. This implies 4th quarter production will be more than 200,000 equivalents per day at a level we have not seen since 2015. This is our new baseline going forward as we've adjusted our asset base the past few years and particularly enhancing the Gulf of Mexico and Eagle Ford Shale. Our 2019 CapEx guidance of $1,350,000,000 to $1,450,000,000 remains within the range we guided at the beginning of the year prior to any of the transactions that we've conducted. This tightened range includes a reduction of $106,000,000 from Malaysia and an increase of $140,000,000 allocated toward the newly acquired Gulf of Mexico assets.
Approximately 20% of the new LLOG capital is allocated towards short cycle tiebacks that are expected to have first oil within 18 months, 20% toward long term tieback projects and the remainder allocated to the Kings long term value creation. We transformed the company with no equity or debt issuances and while buying stock and created a new company with more oil weighting and premium pricing. Eagle Ford Shale is performing with production continuing to wrap up. We're executing short cycle high rate of return projects in the Gulf as well as Eagle Ford. And from this, we will generate significant levels of cash flow.
As always, we continue to focus on our shareholder friendly activities by executing on our share repurchase program and paying our long standing dividend, while maintaining cash flow parity. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to our operator
and And your first question is from Brian Singer from Goldman Sachs. Brian, please go ahead.
Good morning, Brian.
Roger, you provided some helpful project detail on the Gulf of Mexico short and medium term impact from short and medium term project spending and production. When you put these together with your legacy base, can you talk about what Gulf of Mexico total spending and production looks like in 2020 2021?
We are still that really gets him back into another way of really asking Brian, the 2020 CapEx and let me frame and start off with that. We of course have these projects that we sanctioned and there will be additional CapEx that we have. We have a rig program at Frontrunner. We have some non operated wells to do next year. We have not went beyond that work at this time.
And I appreciate the call and focus on this 2020 matter and I know that people are very interested in this. Before we get started on that, I'd just like to start over and frame where Murphy is on this. And again, when we look at data for 2015 to now, we are one of the few companies that have even free cash flow at all. So we're not an overspender, all while being a big dividend and shareholder support to buybacks. So our goal is to be a free cash flow providing company.
So those other projects will need to fit into what we do when we decide our free cash flow CapEx parity as we go into 2020 2021, which have triggers that they can change as well as the projects we disclose here if we need to. So we are not disclosing all those other project CapEx now. We just went with the new projects. We felt it was important to illustrate to investors and analysts that we have purchased some really good assets and what the work is and went out with many years of disclosure trying to illustrate the value of the new assets as well as the ones we just sanctioned.
Okay, thanks. Maybe switching to the Eagle Ford, you highlight the big ramp up in production that's happening there. Can you speak to once you get to the 57,000 BOE a day type rate that you expect to approach in the Q4? What would be needed to hold production flat from a rate count and capital perspective? And then, maybe another way around the 2020 question is what your strategy is for incremental growth and free cash flow at the Eagle Ford once you get to that rate?
I'm going to have Eric answer that for you, Brian.
Thanks for the question. So we've looked quite a bit at what our maintenance capital is to maintain maintain production at a similar rate for our average for this year. That looks to be somewhere in the $425,000,000 to $450,000,000 to maintain at 57,000 Boe a day or something like that would be a little bit more than that. We haven't really worked that exact number, but I think you can do some math to figure approximately what that looks like.
Great. And the strategy in 2020 beyond the 57 continue with further rig adds there or price dependent and free cash flow dependent?
Well, that Brian gets into our 2020 CapEx. Let me just stop and take care of what we have prepared to say on the 2020 CapEx today. As I said earlier, we're not a habitual over spender, not by a long shot, not by our long history. When you look at 2020 CapEx, we really have not worked on this yet. We know the new projects that we just sanctioned with our Board and partners.
We're just starting to work on it next week. This usually begins after August Board meeting and conference call. If you ask us for a range of what's going to happen, it would be a low teens to be below 10% to below 15%, an increase in both production and CapEx for our company, the CapEx that we've disclosed for this year. But like any view of those things with free cash flow parity in play, we will continue to work that as we get into our budgeting process. And as I just mentioned, we entered into a very nice floating production system arrangement with LLOG in which we wanted to take over that operatorship of that project down.
So our capital as put here today has an ability to sell down to FPS, which is greatly being looked at by many midstream companies that we want to take control of the schedule and how the facility is being built before we took that on. So a lot of moving parts with 6 months before we disclose the CapEx here, Brian, this morning. Does that help you with what you need there? So the Eagle Ford CapEx will probably be flat to slightly higher, for sure. And but we want to maintain capital in both there and Gulf of Mexico because that's the key parts of our company.
They will make enormous cash flow and have great operations running there.
Appreciate the color. Thank you.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Arun Jayaram from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Hello, Arun. Good morning.
Good morning, sir. I wanted to ask you about your comments in the press release about achieving free cash flow growth over the long term. You're clearly in a bit of an investing cycle on the Gulf of Mexico. I was wondering if you could maybe give us a bridge to those free cash flow comments that you made in the press release?
Well, we have disclosed a plan that's over $1,000,000,000 of free cash flow over a longer period involving an average capital spend in our Gulf of Mexico business over that period. And we stand behind that today until we rework that plan over the next few months, but have no reason to see a significant change in that plan today. That's been previously disclosed and that we're just reiterating the prior disclosure of our plans of which we will be increasing production at a moderate pace, not an incredible growth trajectory. A lot of increase in there is oil, which is a good thing. And we stand behind the significant free cash flow that we've disclosed throughout the years throughout this year in conferences, etcetera, as we look at our plan starting next week.
Okay. And is there a point in time that you could point to when the inflection comes?
Inflection of what way?
In terms of the free cash flow inflection.
We've disclosed it over that long period of time and we're just staying with what we have and I do not see that changing over that period. And the inflection point is we're not talking about that to rework it again starting next week.
Fair enough. Thanks for that, Roger. Just a follow-up. I was wondering if you could elaborate on your comments on the floating production system. You made some commentary that this could be something that's intriguing from a midstream monetization perspective.
So I just wanted to get a little bit more insights on that.
It's quite common in the Gulf of Mexico today to have facilities handled by 3rd party. There are several of these facilities. We also have a long history of dealing with lease facilities in Malaysia and another facility in the Gulf of Mexico that we prior had ownership of. So this is nothing new. The project was going forward in very early stages when we made the asset purchase.
We have a lot of execution ability in our company, and we're not happy with the terms of that, the way that was headed, took over the operatorship of it and sanctioned it. It has very nice, very nice returns without oil price risk, of course. And we took over that and arranged a tariff system to flow into by other parties. And one of our other partners became a partner with us in the facility. And the facility continues to be sought by midstream companies in which we would remove this CapEx and enter into a leasing arrangement with that party.
It's primarily a takeover of the project with a really nice rate of return. I wish we could just focus on the returns here instead of the capital, CapEx every single quarter year. However, we take over this project, it's a very nice project, then we have the ability to swing our capital as we look at oil prices and free cash flow analysis as we look at our Eagle Ford and our other Gulf business. We felt we needed to disclose that our Board sanctioned it and we have operatorship and 50 percent owner of it today. Great.
Thanks a lot, Roger.
Thank you.
Thank you. Your next question is from Roger Read from Wells Fargo. Roger, please go ahead.
Good morning, Roger.
Good morning, Roger. I guess what most people are trying to get out here on the CapEx front and just to beat the same horse here is understanding maybe what your flexibility would be in 2020 across a range of oil prices. And you think about Gulf of Mexico in a little longer lead time, you commit to something it's tough to change versus we look at the Eagle Ford or Canada. So maybe without giving us a number, can you give us some idea of what your flexibility would be within the Gulf of Mexico next year in terms of pushing things back or not versus what I think we would consider fairly normal abilities to move things around in the Eagle Ford and Canada?
I appreciate that, Roger, and thanks. As I continue to try to explain, we're working on our plan now and have already a big swing just a sell down of this floating production system. So naturally, when you look at capital allocation, you have a ranking. We have a very large dividend payment and we're going to make it. So that's first thing.
We know we want to work in the Gulf and we want to work in Eagle Ford because we have the best prices in the oilfield, Murphy. So why would we not invest there? When you get further away from there, we have things like exploration, we have things like Canada onshore, and we have international development such as Vietnam. So we have a lot of flexibility on those type of matters. We've also gone to $600,000,000 CapEx in 2016 and never issued equity like almost every other company as well.
So we've stopped offshore projects before. We stopped one of the biggest projects in the world at Block H floating LNG one time. We have a flexibility to start, stop and do what we needed as we respond to oil prices and our allocation of capital across those things. So naturally, we want to have the Eagle Ford and the Gulf, the primary benefactors of our CapEx along with our continued shareholder support that's been a long history for us. Also with a strong liquidity, a lot of money in the bank, nothing drawn on the revolver and a long history of not overspending here.
No, I
think we appreciate that. It's just, I mean, that's what the market's concern is across the board. You're getting the same treatment everyone else is. As a secondary question, from an operating standpoint, obviously a lot of moving parts here in the second quarter, get a little more clarity as things roll into the 3rd. Can you give us an idea between the joint venture with Petrobras and then the LLOG acquisition here as you think about cash OpEx in the Gulf of Mexico, how that is progressing and whether you've been able to pull out all of the savings and kind of integration expectations there?
The assets are very similar to what we do. The facilities are very similar. All of that is really has been very seamless. We've transitioned very well, our team in Houston. These are a lot of deals that we've done and had to execute on the accounting side, oil sales side, marketing and operations.
We're a $10 to $13 kind of OpEx in the Gulf, in the total Gulf we have for work over in the 3rd Q4, very highly incredibly high rate of return work over to repair safety valve on a well that we purchased in the Petrobras acquisition that will take place in the Q3. Without that, we'd be a solid $8 or $9 OpEx company. So really good shape on the price we receive for the barrels and operating expense. And their assets are very similar to ours and rolled in at a very similar OpEx to ours.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Your next question is from Mohammad Ghulan from Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Thanks for taking the questions guys. A couple of months ago, you mentioned that there were plans for additional exploration on Block V in Mexico in 2020. Are there any further details you can provide now that we're in the second half of twenty nineteen?
We're doing our work to drill 2 wells there and the difference between 1, 2 or 3 wells will be determined when we go through our budget process, but we're eager to drill there. We have oil that was found there. Amplitude is oil. We have nearby amplitudes we can drill and we have other prospects we can drill and we're excited about going down there when we get through our capital allocation process.
Okay. And kind of another area of exploration, any updates on Australia? Are there any plans we be aware of over the next year or 2?
We have turned over operatorship of about one portion of our blocks to E and I there. We'll be closing that office and moving back to Houston, a very limited 1 or 2 man team to look after that. The big Sedona Basin, of course, remains a working interest large working interest we have there in a very large block. Equinor is supposed to drill a well there over the next couple of years. The outcome of that well could be important to us, but we would need to wait on that execution.
Hence, we've closed that office and retreated back to Houston with a very limited team as part of our global exploration team that we were focused in the Western Hemisphere and that's the update there.
Okay, understood. That's all for me. Thanks.
Thank you.
Your next question is from Paul Cheng from Scotia. Please go ahead, Paul.
Hey, guys. Good morning.
Paul, I haven't heard from you in a long time.
Yes, have been a while that has been on Garden Leaf. Quick question. It looked like with all the M and A transactions, Murphy had become a North American onshore and offshore operator. Is that how we should look at the company going forward? Or you're just 100%.
That's how you should look at it.
Okay. And that I think
Very, very powerful company that we have with high oil rates, increasing oil rates, incredible cash flow, top pricing.
And I think, Roger, you have previously said you target Eagle Ford to be about 90,000 barrels per day by 2021. Is that still the target?
No. I'm not sure where that target comes from. That wouldn't be the target. It would probably be in the going forward, it would be 60, 70, 80s as we look through 'twenty one to 'twenty three kind of a number, Paul.
So 60 to 70. Okay.
And 80s into 2023, that would match with the previously disclosed guidance we have on cash flow generation in all of our prior decks that we've been using all year. There's no change in that.
Okay. That's probably my mistake then. For Murphy,
could
you just remind me what your working interest in Samurai, Mormon and Khaleesi?
We are fifty-fifty in Samurai and we're 34% in Khaleesi, Mormon and 50% in the floating production system facility.
Okay. And it looks like based on what you disclosed on the Gulf of Mexico projects, you appear that to suggest you will be able to hold the Gulf of Mexico production, which is roughly about 100,000 barrels per day, including your joint venture to be at least for the next 10 plus years. Is that correct in our interpretation?
Our plans that we've disclosed in which we stand behind going into our CapEx review next week because it's a focus area is to maintain Gulf of Mexico near $85,000 with an average capital spend of $325 per year over a 5 year period, leading to significant cash flow from that 5 year period. We stand behind that and we have these assets here are illustrating number 1, they were put there to illustrate the returns of the asset and incredible rate of return and disclosure of the long profile of cash flow. Also, Clisey Mormont has been reserved reviewed by 2 third party firms. So the point of the slides are to illustrate the returns and the long cash flow and CapEx that we have. We have natural decline in our fields and these and other work projects we have inside the capital we previously disclosed maintains that flat strong cash flow providing production base while Eagle Ford is our growing oil production base.
When you're talking about 85,000,000 is that net of your minority interest or including
No, everything I say is net to Murphy, Paul. Okay.
So that when I was talking about 100 is including the minority.
Yes, that's of course correct. But as we say in the call, it's written all over the place. It is confusing, I understand that. But we always report when it comes out of my lips, it's mine, not somebody else.
Okay. So whatever is the number that
you're talking about is net of the minority interest?
Correct. Yes, sir. 85 Murphy.
And that if I looking at that, do you maybe that you're probably not ready to talk about yet. If I look at your current asset mix as a company as a whole, if I want to maintain the production level and oil and gas mix, what is that CapEx number? I think previously that before this transaction, you sort of talking about in the $800,000,000 or so. So what's that number may look like today?
The maintenance CapEx number, Paul?
Yes. To maintain your production mix and your current production level?
Yes. We feel that's 850,000,000 to 900,000,000 dollars $50,000,000 to $900,000,000
Okay, very good. Thank you.
Good talking with you again. Appreciate it.
Thank you. There are no further questions from our phone lines. I would now like to turn the call back over to Roger Jenkins for any closing remarks.
Thanks everyone for calling in today. We look forward to continue to update you on our continued oil production growth in our North American assets, which are outstanding. Thank you and see you soon.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and we ask that you please disconnect your lines.