Good morning and welcome to the Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jessica Largent, Vice President of Investor Relations.
Please go ahead.
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Newmont's Q2 2018 conference call. Joining us on the call today are Gary Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer Nancy Beasley, Chief Financial Officer and Tom Palmer, Chief Operating Officer. They will be available to answer questions at the end of the call along with other members of our executive team. Turning to Slide 2.
Before we go further, please take a moment to review the cautionary statements shown here and refer to our SEC filings, which can be found on our website at newmont.com. And now, I will turn it over to Gary on Slide 3.
Thank you, Jeff, and thank you all for joining us this morning. We turned in strong operational performance despite geotechnical challenges in the Q2 and strengthened our ability to create long term value for our shareholders. This was the result of a steady focus on meeting our commitments to apply lessons learned and leverage technology to make our operations safer and more efficient, to deliver 2 projects on or ahead of schedule and at or below budget and advance new options to strengthen our portfolio and to maintain our leading dividend, balance sheet and sustainability performance. Turning to more details on slide 4. The first pillar of our strategy is to deliver superior operational execution.
In the Q2, we produced 1,200,000 ounces of gold at all in sustaining costs of $10.24 per ounce, keeping us in line with our full year guidance. We also recorded our lowest total injury rate for the year in June and began to apply lessons learned to raise our safety performance. And we continued to improve costs and efficiency. I was at our centralized asset health center in Nevada last week, where we have expanded our remote monitoring capabilities beyond North America to include Myriad's fleet. The system detected an exhaust temperature anomaly in a truck operating in Suriname.
This early alert allows the team at Merion to investigate and correct a problem that could have caused serious engine damage. The second pillar of our strategy is to sustain a global portfolio of long life assets. During the Q2, our teams completed the Twin Underground and Northwest Exodus projects adding lower cost production in Nevada. We reached agreements to acquire a 50% interest in the world class Galore Creek asset and to partner with Teck to advance pre feasibility studies. We also formed new partnerships with Sumitomo to advance the Anacocha Sulfides project in Peru and with Maverick Metals through the sale of our royalty portfolio.
And we had about 85 drill rigs operating around the world to advance brownfields and greenfields prospects. The 3rd pillar of our strategy is to lead the gold sector in profitability and responsibility. In the second quarter, we declared a dividend of $0.14 per share for the Q3 running, and we maintained one of the strongest balance sheets in the sector with an investor grade credit rating and nearly $6,000,000,000 of liquidity. Finally, we published our annual sustainability report and hosted Turn to slide 5. While our safety performance improved last month, it's not where we want it to be, and we have launched 2 initiatives to turn it around.
First, nearly 70% of our injuries year to date have involved contractors working at Newmont sites. To reverse that trend, we are leveraging our safety performance and embed robust controls and plans to make safety an even stronger component on contract delivery. 2nd, following the tragic accident at the Ahafo Mill expansion, we are putting the results of our investigation to work by applying lessons learned across all of our operations. These lessons focus on establishing and enforcing barricades and exclusion zones, designing and verifying more effective temporary structures and performing comprehensive risk assessments when tasks or conditions change. We are now rolling these lessons out to all Newmont employees and contractors and sharing them across the broader mining community.
Turning to our cost performance on Slide 6. Our long term record shows a steady trajectory of improvement, but as expected, our cost rise temporarily in 2018 as we execute stripping campaigns at Carlin, Twin Creeks, Boddington and Yanacocha. 2nd quarter costs also reflect planned maintenance shutdowns, lower production and increased investment in advanced projects and exploration. We remain in line with guidance and continue to improve costs and efficiency through our full potential program, focusing on enhancing ore body modeling and mine planning, increasing mill throughput and recovery and leveraging technology based on its value and viability. Turning to production on Slide 7.
We produced 1,200,000 ounces of gold on an attributable basis in the Q2, and we remain on track to meet our full year outlook of between 4,900,000 and 5,400,000 ounces of gold on an attributable basis. Our outlook reflects productivity gains in mine planning and mill performance as well as success in bringing new mines and extensions into production. And 2018 continues to be weighted to the back half of the year when we will reach higher grades in Africa and the Americas. Turning to our current projects on Slide 8. We recently delivered 2 profitable projects in North America.
First, we achieved commercial production at the Twin Creeks underground on the 1st July, which will generate an internal rate of return of about 20%. The project was completed on schedule for $42,000,000 just below our guidance of between $45,000,000 $55,000,000 This extension adds higher grade, lower cost production at Twin Creeks, allows us to process stockpiled ore that had previously been classified as waste and will extend processing life to 2,030. 2nd, Northwest Exotis was completed ahead of schedule and within budget at $69,000,000 and is expected to generate a rate of return of more than 40%. This extension adds lower cost production at Carlin and serves as an exploration platform to support future growth. Northwest Exodus also features advanced technology to improve safety and efficiency.
We are mining the deposit with 2 autonomous loaders and pilot testing autonomous drills. And we have set up underground Wi Fi to keep our people, systems and equipment In Africa, we remain on track to reach commercial production at Subika Underground in the Q4 of this year, and work at the Ahafo Mill expansion is ramping up and we expect to reach commercial production in the second half of twenty nineteen. In South America, we are accelerating stripping at Quecher Main to extend oxide production at Yanacocha. And finally, in Australia, we are laying pipeline at the Tanami Power project, which will lower costs and emissions and facilitate future growth. These 6 projects will generate an average internal return of above 20%, helping to improve our outlook.
Turning to Slide 9. Newmont's 5 year outlook calls for steady gold production at competitive costs with ongoing investment in profitable growth. However, we are beginning to see early signs that input costs, including higher oil, cyanide and labor rates could put pressure on our operations and projects. These headwinds are partially offset by a favorable Australian dollar exchange rate and our hedging program through which we have hedged about 10% of our diesel exposure in 2018. We have not changed our global operational guidance, but Tom will cover a few regional and site changes in his remarks.
Turning to our latest investment in the future on Slide 10. This morning, we announced agreements to acquire NOVAGOLD's 50 percent ownership interest in Galore Creek and to form a partnership with Teck, who owns the other half. Galore Creek, located in British Columbia, is one of the largest undeveloped copper gold projects and holds the potential for multiple decades of profitable production. The agreement is for a staged and contingent investment of $275,000,000 with an initial payment of $100,000,000 The balance of the investment will be made in 3 stages on completion of the pre feasibility study, the feasibility study and on reaching a final decision to develop the project. We believe this acquisition is a good fit with our skills and portfolio and aligns with our strategy to create long term value for our stakeholders.
It also presented an opportunity to partner with Teck, a company noted for its safety, technical and financial strength and its commitment to leading social and environmental performance. Newmont and Tek will define the scope, budget and timeline for pre feasibility studies over the next several months and manage the project through a joint steering committee. With that, I'll turn it over to Nancy on Slide 11 to discuss our Q2 financial results.
Thank you, Gary. Turning to Slide 12 for the highlights. In the second quarter, we delivered revenue of $1,700,000,000 a slight decrease from the prior year quarter driven by lower sales volumes, which were partially offset by higher realized gold price. Adjusted net income of $144,000,000 or $0.26 per diluted share and adjusted EBITDA of $545,000,000 compared to $699,000,000 in Q2 of 2017. Cash from continuing operations was $401,000,000 compared to $525,000,000 in the prior year quarter, primarily driven by lower volumes and higher stockpile inventories and tax payments.
Turning to Slide 13 to review our earnings per share in more detail. 2nd quarter GAAP net income from continuing operations was $0.51 per diluted share. Primary adjustments included an $0.18 adjustment related to the sale of our royalty portfolio and an $0.08 adjustment related to valuation allowances and other tax impacts. Taking these adjustments into account, we delivered adjusted net income of $0.26 per diluted share. Turning to capital priorities on Slide 14.
Newmont continues to have one of the strongest balance sheets in the gold sector and we remain committed to maintaining an investment grade credit profile. In June, S and P Global Ratings highlighted the strength of our financial position and revised its outlook from stable to positive, while reaffirming a BBB rating on our senior debt. With liquidity of $6,000,000,000 including approximately $3,000,000,000 of cash on hand, we remain well positioned to execute our capital priorities, including investing in the next generation of Newmont operations to improve mine life and build a stronger reserve base and returning cash to shareholders. Earlier this week, we declared a dividend of $0.14 per share, reflecting an increase of 87% over the prior year quarter. Based on an annualized quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share and the share buyback program, we are on track to return more than $350,000,000 to shareholders in 2018.
And now, I'll hand it over to Tom for a discussion of our operations starting on Slide 15.
Thank you, Nancy. Turning to North America on Slide 16. As expected, Carlin's production was lower as we safely completed our annual planned maintenance at Mill 6 on time and under budget. And we continue to monitor and manage geotechnical risks we work to deweight the slip in the Silver Star pit from 2016 in order to access the ore. At CC and V, production was impacted by lower leach recoveries and continued stockpiling of concentrates for shipment to Nevada.
This quarter, Carlin began processing CC and B concentrates, which will improve recoveries at both sites over time. Through June, we shipped 17,000 ounces to Nevada and stockpiled 29,000 ounces at CC and V. Shipments are expected to increase over the coming months. In addition, improvements to the CC and V mill are now complete. This will allow for the production of a cleaner concentrate to be shipped starting in the second half of twenty eighteen.
Twin Creeks continues to manage through lower grades as stripping begins in the next layback of the mega pit. And as Gary mentioned, we completed both the Twin Underground and Northwest Exters projects, adding lower cost production in Nevada. I'd like to thank the teams at Carlin and Twin Creeks for continuing to deliver on our strategy and extend the profitable production in North America. And finally, studies into the next phase for Long Canyon are continuing on course. Turning to South America on Slide 17.
At Merian, we generated solid performance during the Q2 with continued mill productivity improvements. Just last week, I was able to see the new primary crusher operating. It is on track to be commissioned in the 3rd quarter and will help sustain mill throughput when we reach fresh rock early next year. 4 additional trucks arrived at site on schedule and will increase hauling capacity going forward. And our full potential program is underway at Merian, and we are starting to deliver further improvements.
At Yanacocha, an optimized ore blending strategy has helped offset slower leach recoveries, and we expect cost to improve as the change in our mill feed strategy has prioritized lower cost oxides over deep transitional ore. We are accelerating stripping at Quecher Main and expect to start placing ore on an existing leach pad by the end of the year. The drilling program at Chaquicocha Oxides is ongoing, and we continue to advance studies for Yanacocha Sulfides to reach definitive feasibility late this year. Turning to Australia on Slide 18. KCGM experienced rockfalls on the eastern wall of the Fimersen pit in mid May.
The mines' detection systems identified movement prior to the event, and no one was injured. Mining continues in the southern end of the pit. However, an exclusion zone has been put in place at the bottom of the eastern wall as an additional site to precaution. As a consequence, mining rates have been reduced, and we now expect our share of 2018 production to be between 280,000, 330,000 ounces at an all in sustaining cost of between $8.25 $8.75 per ounce. We do have insurance coverage for these type of pit wall events and are engaged with the affected underwriters.
The Mount Charlotte underground mine and the KCGM processing plants are operating normally and the site is able to process stockpiled ore. The KCGM team continues to assess longer term impacts, including mine plan reevaluations. We have received the EPA permit for the Morrison layback and subject to the mine plan reviews, still anticipate some form of this project to proceed later this year. At Boddington, we delivered a strong quarter with higher production as maintenance originally scheduled for Q2 was pulled forward to Q1. This timing shift was part of the site's full potential program to optimize the mill maintenance strategy and improve performance.
Looking forward, Boddington is ramping up their planned stripping campaign in the second half of twenty eighteen, and it will continue through 2019. At Tanami, strong mill performance and improved mine productivity offset lower grades in the second quarter. The Tanami power project has been fully permitted and the pipeline construction teams have been mobilized. Civil work for the power stations is well underway and the project is expected to come online in the first half of twenty nineteen. Finally, we are advancing Tanami Expansion II studies and drilling a pilot hole for a shaft to further inform our approach.
Turning to Africa on Slide 19. In the first half of twenty eighteen, we delivered steady results at both Ahafo and Achim as strong mill performance continues to offset harder ores and lower grades. However, at Ahafo, unit costs increased due to higher inventory costs driven by lower mine grades and higher surface mining costs. As a result, we now expect Africa's 2018 all in sustaining costs to be between $8.80 $9.40 per ounce with no change to our production guidance. Looking ahead, we continue to work with the Minerals Commission and are in the process of safely restarting construction activities at Ahafo's 2 expansion projects.
The delay in the Ahafo Mill expansion schedule will shift 1st gold into the second half of twenty nineteen, but we still anticipate reaching commercial production during the same period with no change to the total capital estimate. Sobeeka Underground continues to ramp up, And despite minor delays in construction surface infrastructure, the project is still expected to reach commercial production in the Q4 of this year. We continue to advance studies for Ahafo North and Ahafo Underground, and we progressed the ACHIM underground project to pre feasibility. This next stage of study will focus on permitting and increasing resource confidence. Turning to the rest of the year on Slide 20.
We continue to be back half weighted in 2018. 3rd quarter production is expected to improve as we increase processing of CC and V concentrates in Nevada and continue mining at Subika Underground. However, costs are expected to increase at KCGM and at Long Canyon and Moddington with higher stripping. We plan to finish the year strongly with grades improving at Carlin, Yanacocha and Ahafo, delivering our highest production and lowest costs in the 4th quarter. In summary, our global cost, production and capital outlook is unchanged, and we remain on track to meet our commitments in 2018.
Now I'll hand it back to Gary on Slide 21.
Thanks, Tom. Turning to Slide 22. We continue to focus on operating and growing our business in 4 regions where we have the stability, resources and relationships that underpin our ongoing success. More than 70% of our production and about the same amount of our reserves are located in the United States and Australia, and we continue to invest in projects and prospects that we will improve that will improve our margins, reserves and resources. These factors position us to maintain stable returns over the next decade and beyond.
Our portfolio is also differentiated by a robust project pipeline. Turning to Slide 23. Newmont's team has proven its ability to optimize projects, deliver them on time and budget and generate a solid rate of return. This gives us the means to maintain steady production while growing margins and reserves. Projects included in our outlook are the current and sustaining capital projects you see here, Morrison and the Tanami Power project in Australia, the Subika Underground and Nahafo Mill Expansion in Ghana and Quecher Main in Peru.
Twin Underground in Peru. Twin Underground and Northwest Exodus are also included in our outlook, but were removed from the pipeline at completion. A mid term project that will improve our outlook is Ahafo North, shown here in green. We continue to invest in progressing our longer term projects shown here in dark blue. This quarter, we advanced Achim underground from scoping to pre feasibility and expect to start delivering the decline in 2020 developing rather the decline in 2020 with ore processed through the existing mill.
Finally, we added Galore Creek to our pipeline as a pre feasibility stage project. This pipeline lays the foundation for steady long term production and profitability. Turning to slide 24. This is our expected production profile for the next 7 years. Gold production is forecast to remain at about 5,000,000 attributable ounces and our share of global mine production is projected to grow over the same time period.
This profile includes production from existing operations as well as sustaining and current projects that are included in our guidance. The green layer shows production from our mid term Ahafo North project, which is not included in our guidance and the dark blue layer shows 2 longer term feasibility projects Tanami Expansion II and Yanacocha Sulfides, representing further upside. Overall, Newmont's stable asset base and robust project pipeline represent a distinct competitive advantage. And we will maintain that advantage over the longer term by investing in exploration. Turning to slide 25.
In North America, we continue to pursue multiple underground expansions at Carlin and progressed the pre feasibility study for Long Canyon Phase 2. Our plateau exploration program is underway in the Canadian Yukon and we plan to test 8 different drill targets this year. Finally, we will begin scoping pre feasibility studies at Galore Creek in the coming months. We expect these studies to be completed over 3 to 4 years with an annual budget of between $10,000,000 $15,000,000 for our 50% stake. In South America, we continue to see favorable drilling and process test results at the Anacocha Sulfides and Chaquicocha Oxides projects in Peru, and we are working with Continental Gold to support the safe and efficient development of the high grade Baritica project as well as nearby exploration assets in Colombia.
We are also establishing a new country office in Medellin and have appointed a fit for purpose team to establish a presence and relationships in the country. In Africa, we are advancing studies to develop underground deposits at both Ahafo and Achim, and we are working with a local partner, Azana, to explore greenfields opportunities in Ethiopia. Finally, in Australia, we are pursuing our second expansion at Tanami and advancing greenfield's exploration prospects across the continent. Newmont has laid a strong foundation for these efforts by establishing fair land agreements with traditional owners and a reputation for respectful engagement. Putting it all together on slide 26, we delivered solid second quarter performance and are laying the groundwork for an even stronger future.
We will continue to execute our long term strategy, which is to deliver steady gold production safely and at competitive costs over a long time horizon, invest in the next generation of mines, technology and leaders across our business and lead the gold sector in terms of the value we create and the standards we uphold. Thank you for your time. And with that, I'll turn it over to the operator to open the line for
And our first question comes from Michael Dudas of Vertical Research. Please go ahead.
Good morning all. Can you hear me, Gary? Yes. Okay. Thank you.
So the gestation period for Galore continues. I want to share a little more on your thought process here. Is it the compounding market, pricing, timing, the opportunities in jurisdiction? What were some of the real major thrusts to bring this all together? And has this been on the plate for a while?
Or is it did it happen recently? Just a little more color towards the thought process here with Galore?
Sure thing. I think as we assess all things, we look for longer term value opportunities and I've been very clear we're looking for gold or copper gold potential. This is actually I think in the history of Newmont probably the 3rd time around that we have taken a look and this is an opportunity we think at fair value we've been able to acquire and we really like working with Teck. We've worked and talked with them in the past. I think our value set and approach to operations and sustainability really come together quite well and just see this as a good opportunity.
Clearly, we've got work to do. We've got a pre feasibility study that's going to take the next 3 to 4 years to work through with Teck and figure out what is the right way to develop this deposit and how to bring it forward and when to bring it forward. So there's more work to do, but we're excited about the potential both at the resource and in working with our new partner, Teck.
Gary, you mentioned in your prepared remarks, I think you said 83 rigs around the world that you're working on. As we look towards your reserve profile next year, where are some of the opportunities you're seeing some better results or more exciting results to help us achieve those goals?
We are I mean, I think we are mentioned including in the call here, we are seeing some good results at Yanacocha as we continue to look at both the sulfides and the oxide deposits. Tanami would be another area that looks exciting. I see some interesting results coming out of the Carlin area. And in terms of work we're doing there. Long Canyon, we continue to bring forward and the Ahafo underground and as I mentioned, the Achim underground move forward, we're seeing some good things there.
So still, we won't declare reserves changes till the end of the year, but we see ourselves on track towards that 4,000,000 ounce reserve addition, at least that amount here this year.
And finally, Gary, as you assess cost pressures as you highlighted, have they accelerated from Q1 or from what you would anticipate a year ago? Are they abating? And where maybe 1 or 2 areas that really I am sure it's more regional than not, but that is more difficult to offset from Full Financial?
Yes. I think clearly oil costs have affected the whole business. So that one, I think everyone's got good transparency and we give some information on offsetting that. The Aussie dollars drop back down kind of in line with as gold prices come down. So it's down in the $0.74 to $0.75 range.
We have seen some cyanide cost increases and that's really input costs that go into the cyanide product that have been coming through. That's a little bit outside of what we would have had built into our plans. A little bit of labor, really kind of keeping an eye on, as I said before, we watch where turnover is starting to pick up and we've seen a little bit in North America and in Australia, the labor market is heating up a bit. So we're keeping an eye on that. Nothing outside of what we at this stage had planned for, but it's one that I want to flag for the market as we go forward that we are keeping an eye on.
Excellent, Gary. Thanks for your thoughts.
Thanks, Michael.
Our next question comes from John Bridges of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Good morning, Gary, everybody. Thanks for a drama free set of results. Just following on from Mike's question on Galore, it had a pretty long development plan in some of the earlier feasibility studies with this long tunnel and whatever. I know it's early stage, but would you be sort of likely to be dribbling capital into that to shorten the development program and make it easier to make a decision when the copper price in the markets are receptive?
Yes, I think thanks for the question, John, and thanks for the comment on the lack of dramas. I think the we wouldn't be trying to time a market. I don't think we're anyone that's good at this stage. What we would be doing is to really step back, take a good look at the work that's been done. A lot of good work's been done already, but then bring our heads together with the technical and social folks at with tech and work together with our team to come up with the best development plan.
There's different options in terms of how to access and develop the resource, the several pits or potential pits that are there, and we want to work through. So I don't want to preclude anything at this stage. I think we want to take a look with an open mind at all the options.
Okay. And then just perhaps as a follow-up, you mentioned the underground opportunities within Carlin. What was your vision for that large land package you've got there? Because if you simply look at the reserve base in Carlin, then it's one of the shorter life assets on versus reserve basis. But then given the underground opportunities you found already and the ones that you have a sense that could be there, then you could be mining there for a long time?
I think and as you've seen, Carlin has been in operation for over 50 years. We have a pretty good resource and mineral inventory base that we are pretty confident as we continue to better understand some of the geology and structure around there that we could add primarily from an underground standpoint as I see it, but I spent time I was out there last week really at all the operations and feel comfortable in terms of extensions around Carlin, Long Canyon, we continue the development of Phase 2, some interesting things around Immigrant that we're taking a look at. So as we use both current technology and continue to extend the use of our deep sensing geochemistry to better understand things that may be covered at depth that we haven't actually looked at. Most of what's been discovered today has had some sort of a surface exposure or have been accidentally found by a water well or something. So I think using this technology to try to discover as yet unfound deposits, I think, has good potential in Nevada.
Okay, great. Good luck and thanks again
for the results. Thanks, John.
Our next question comes from David Houghton of CIBC. Please go ahead.
Good morning, Gary, Nancy and Tom. I was actually admiring the call that you've got on Page 26 from Tanami, a very impressive bit of VG there. Just going over to Ahafo. So you're now pushing the commercial start up. It looks like it would be delayed by as much as a quarter given the unfortunate circumstances early this year.
But the CapEx is maintained for 2018. Can you see some sliding of the CapEx from 'eighteen into 2019?
I'll have Tom address that.
Thanks,
Garrett. Thanks, David. What we're able to do following the shutdown of the construction work on-site, David, as we worked through that incident and the appropriate recovery from that There's still quite a bit of off-site work going on, so a lot of fabrication and procurement work still going on. And that was able to help us minimize the impact to schedule. So we're still seeing a similar print spend profile in this year as a consequence of that.
So there will be a little bit of flow over capital into next year as a result of the cessation of construction activity on-site. But as I say, a lot of off-site work was able to continue through that time period.
And you're thinking we should be looking at commercial production more in Q4 of next year than in Q3 or Q2?
At this stage, I'd just keep it to the second half. I mean, we're very much in the process of remobilizing now. So as we get back into construction activities proper, then we'll be able to reassess the various work fronts and then understand and refine that schedule. So I'd keep it at first half second half rather at this stage.
All right. To Kalgoorlie. So guidance this year down 70,000 ounces impact into next year as a consequence of that East Wall slip.
Can you
just walk us through what the implications are for the mining with, I presume, a restricted footprint of access and remedial work and what it means for the layback of Morrison and the timing of that?
Thanks, David. I'll keep going with the answer to that question. So with the slip on the east wall, that took out the ramp on the east wall of that pit. So that was the ramp we're planning to use for the Morrison layback that we were bringing forward. So as we work through the reassessment of Morrison, it will be how we can mine a smaller Morrison and not rely upon that ramp on the east wall.
As we work through our longer term plans, looking at a and a lot of the work to date was about safely understanding the impact of that slip and understanding the impact for this year. So work is still underway in terms of the longer term impact and the various scenarios around that. A lot of that is associated with the type of remediation that we'll do on that East Wall, how we might lay back that slip area and the various geotechnical work and the drilling work we'll need to do to better inform that approach. So that's going to take a little bit of time for us to work through and then understand the longer term impacts beyond 2018 and then how we access the Greater Morrison resource. But we'll continue to be mining from the southern end of the pit, there's some material on the western wall as well that we will be destacking that's been sitting underneath the west wall slip.
And we'll continue to process stockpiled ore through the mill. So the processing plants, the 2 well, the 3 processing plants at Casa Jim are still running at full rates. And in fact, they're running at rates that we haven't seen since 2,005. So we're maximizing the processing through the plant to minimize the impact from this slip.
The strip CapEx there was going to be about $1,000,000 spread over a number of years, 2018 through to 2025, basically, and getting production access to Morrison in 2019. Should we be pushing that out by a year or 2, do you think?
We'll have a well, I'm anticipating having a smaller Morrison this year. How big that is and what the spend will be, we're still working through. So we need some more time to work through that process. So we'll need to come back to you at a future date with some more information there, David.
All right. I'll leave it there for now. Thank you.
Thanks, David. And a reminder, you get an opportunity to see firsthand that core from Tanami if you visit in November that we've got planned with investors.
Very nice.
Our next question comes from Stephen Walker of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Thank you. And just a follow-up on David's question, if I might. Maybe is it reasonable to look at CC and excuse me, KCGM as for the next couple of years anyways maintain sort of your share production at the 280,000 to 300,000 ounce a year range that is looking at the stockpiles lower grades and other sources of ore to basically sustain at these levels. Is that a safe assumption when we look at our model for? Yes.
I think that yes, I think at this stage, Stephen, as we continue, as Tom described, the planning work that's going on, I think that's a good starting point and we will give further update most likely when we give our full year guidance for 2019 at the end of this year.
Thank you. And then just a separate question on CC and V. Tom, you made reference to that you shipped about 17,000 tons of corn to the Carlin plant. I guess the question is on a quarterly run rate basis, what should we assume? And is that concentrating is that concentrate displacing roaster ore as it is, like lower grade roaster ore?
And should we see an improvement in what comes out of the roasters in Carland as you ship more material from CC and V?
Thanks, Stephen. I just might clarify that was 17,000 ounces of gold that we shipped in a 30,000 sitting stockpile. You will certainly see there's 2 things that stockpiled ore will start to stockpiled concentrate will start to move through the 3rd Q4. We're stockpiling because we had to do some improvements to La County Road that are now complete. So we're ramping up shipments as we speak and we're now commissioning the cleaner concentrate circuit that will produce a higher grade, particularly in sulphur coming out of the C2B plant.
So that gold and sulphur will go into Mill 6. So it provides a heat source that allows us to put higher grade Carlin ore through Mill 6. So we will see some benefit at Carlin as a result of that fuel source that comes from that concentrate. We're still very much on target to hit our guidance for CC and V. So if you just look at the first half and extrapolate to where we're predicting guidance to be for the year, you get a measure of the impact of shipping that concentrate to Nevada is going to have on CC and V gold production for the full year and in particular, the second half.
Okay. And then presumably extend that into 2019, 2020 as well?
That's right. That process of sending concentrate to Nevada will continue in the future years.
Our next question comes from Tanya Jakusconek of Scotiabank.
I guess that Dave asked my questions on the Morrison layback. And just to make sure I understood, so by year end, we will have some sort of an idea when you put out your guidance, I guess, in December, what the sort of smaller Morrison layback looks like just with the getting back to the ramp access that you right now don't have. Is that a clear am I understanding it correctly?
Yes, that's correct, Tanya.
Okay. So I'll leave that one and maybe I can come back to 2 other things. One is just back on Galore Creek. Just wanted to understand, Gary, you said this is the 3rd time you've looked at this. Coming back to it a 3rd time, was it that there is a willing seller right now?
Was it just a willing seller? And how did you come up with the valuation on the purchase price? Was it based on dollar per ounce in the ground? Was it based on a discounted cash flow? I'm just trying to understand how you put value on this?
Well, a little bit of all of the above. And it was about a year ago that we began dialogue with the group and have worked through our view on what the value of the deposit is at this stage and then went through the normal sort of commercial negotiation that you go through to reach commercial terms and we staged it. So as we move forward and get better confidence in it, it's tied back into us gaining greater confidence in the future and how it would be developed. So that didn't come all at once. We worked through that as we work through the pre fees and then feasibility studies.
Okay. So is it safe to say that it's been a year that you've been working on this and you've looked at all of the studies out there and somewhere between looking at the studies and valuation on per ounce in the ground is how you came up with your purchase price for an unstaged payments?
Yes, that's correct.
Okay. And then just coming back to a team, I noticed that you put a press release on your website with regards to some contention with farmers around the area and some compensation. Can you just give us an update of what's exactly happening there?
Sure. I'm going to hand over to Tom to cover that. Thanks, Gary, and thanks, Tanya, for
the question. We're working through a process where some local residents raised some concerns over payment of ground and crop compensation that dates back to before the mine started and then having some issues around mine related impacts. So everything we're doing is consistent with what we're required to do and in terms of the agreements we've had in place. But we've been involved in good faith dialogue with community leaders, with the people who are raising these concerns and working through a mediation process to reach a form of resolution there with them. And that process has been progressing over a period of time.
What you saw in more recent times is the group, which we're quite comfortable with, staged demonstration to further support their claim. So that took place, a peaceful demonstration over a few hours a couple of days ago. So that was the activity was related to that. We continue to engage in good faith dialogue to reach a resolution with those people who are raising those concerns.
And when is the mediation did you have a time line for the mediation process?
It's been ongoing, and we'll continue to work through that process until we can reach a resolution. There isn't any fixed deadline. It's a bit we remain ready, willing and able to sit down and discuss these issues with them.
So besides the peaceful demonstration that you had the other day, is that really the only sort of demonstration you've had on this site with respect to these farmers and their crops?
Yes. Going back in terms of my memory and it's yes, that would be
the case.
Okay. And we've seen nothing like this at Ahafo in that area?
We haven't seen demonstrations on these particular issues at Ahafo, but we do see from time to time demonstrations over different issues that we need to work through with the community and the community leaders to manage and understand those issues. So it's not unusual in Ghana to see the community demonstrate as part of a process of talking through their issues.
Our next question comes from Mike Jalanin of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Hi, Gary. A question for yourself and Randy, just coming back to Galore again. I know there's been a few questions, but still haven't quite heard from you because here's a project that Teck basically mothballed many years ago, never heard much about it. And then now it's come back to life again. Just wondering where Tech sorry, Newmont, I guess, Tech also see the opportunity to improve the economics of the project that could lead to a positive feasibility study for attractive returns, I guess, that's what I was wondering?
Yes. I think as you look in tech's published information, they have got it out there as a longer term opportunity. We see it in a similar manner and one that we will work together to see if we can improve on the valuation. I'm going to see if Randy wants to add anything to that.
Yes, Mike, I think there is
this project, there's opportunities to look at the things like the tunnel access opportunities, I think, phase mine planning, plant design optimization, all of those opportunities taking 2 quality partners like Teck and Newmont working together really could create some substantial value above and beyond what's been looked at so far. I think there's also good there's good opportunity to define the upside further on the ore body and the resource.
Okay. Now, this kind of signifies Newmont's acquisition strategy focusing on more longer term development projects rather than assets in production?
Yes, I think that fits with what we've been saying to the market, what we went through at our Investor Day, really looking at earlier stage opportunities that we can bring in either through our own exploration or through partnering with different parties and bringing those forward. That doesn't mean we won't look at operating assets much like we did with CC and V a few years ago, if we can obtain them at fair value.
Okay. Thank you.
Thanks, Mike.
Our next question comes from Greg Barnes of TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you. Gary, are
you getting a better sense around the Chekatakocha Oxides and how that fits in between now and anacocha sulfides and how that fits in potentially with Quecher Main?
Yes. At this stage, Quecher Main is progressing well. We hope to see some initial production there later this year and that's actually doing quite well. We were down there last month visiting. The oxide is yet to be included in any of our plans.
So it would be something as we put our plans and give our forecast later this year for 2019 on out that we would look to include the oxides. But we continue to see good potential for both the North and the South Chalky Oxides as we continue to drill and get a better handle on that. So that would be in addition to what we have already provided in guidance and something that we will present later this year.
The Kesha Main is a couple of 100,000 ounces a year and bridges you to Yanacocha Sulfides, this would be over and above that in terms of incremental production?
That's the right way to look at it, Craig.
Any sense of potential there?
We'll come out with that later this year when we give guidance. Okay. Fair enough. Thanks.
Our next question comes from Lucas Pipes of B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning everybody and thank you for taking my question. Not to deliver Galore Creek too much, but obviously over the last few years, there's been a tremendous amount of uncertainty caused by resource nationalism and obviously Galore Creek safe jurisdiction in British Columbia. To what extent does that play a role in your valuation of this asset and strategic decision to invest there?
Yes, I think as you look, we've got a footprint that's in 4 jurisdictions that allows us to take a look at potential opportunities in all those 4 jurisdictions, Canada being 1 and we think this is a good it's one of the elements clearly, Lucas, that we do consider when we look at opportunities. So that was one of the elements.
And but it's not I shouldn't read it as a pivot more towards safe jurisdictions to continue to feel comfortable kind of where you are or do you think maybe the center of gravity could shift a little bit over the coming years?
I think we continue to go where the best assets and the best potential profile is. An example is the Medellin office that we have just opened up in Colombia. We see that as a strategic toehold there towards what we see as an improving situation there and something that looks good, much like we saw Peru 20 years ago, we see Colombia. So I wouldn't say we're rushing in any certain direction we're going where it makes sense.
Got it. Thank you. And then on Galore Creek, do you think the project is more valuable with Teck as a partner or do you think it could maybe make sense for you to go ahead by yourselves?
I think our view is working alongside tech makes good sense there.
Got it. Okay. Well, thank you very much.
Thanks, Lucas.
This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Gary Goldberg for any closing remarks.
Thank you for joining our call this morning. Newmont delivered solid second quarter results. We produced 1,200,000 ounces of gold at all in sustaining costs of 10 $24 per ounce, in line with our full year guidance. We delivered 2 profitable projects, established strategic partnerships and invested in an exciting growth opportunity in British Columbia. We also declared an industry leading dividend while maintaining a strong balance sheet and continued to provide more information on our environmental, social and governance performance and our goals for the future.
We look forward to maintaining a momentum in the second half and continuing to lead the gold sector in profitability and responsibility. Thank you for joining us and for your interest in Newmont.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.