Good morning. My name is Sharon, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Newmark Group, Inc. 1st Quarter 2018 Financial Results Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise.
After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Thank you. I'll now turn the call over to Jason McGruder, Head of Investor Relations. Sir, you may
begin. Good morning. We issued our Q1 2018 financial results press release and a presentation summarizing our results this morning. You can find these documents at ir. Ngks.com.
Unless otherwise stated, the results provided on today's call compare only the Q1 of 2018 with the year earlier period. We'll be referring to results on this call only on an adjusted earnings basis unless otherwise stated. We may also refer to adjusted EBITDA. Please see today's press release for results under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. Please also see the section at the back of today's press release for the complete definition of any such non GAAP terms, reconciliations of these items to the corresponding GAAP results and how, when and why management uses them.
I also remind you that the information on today's call regarding our business that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties. Except as required by law, Newmark undertakes no obligation to update any forward looking statements. With regard to references about the proposed spin off of Newmark on today's call, it's important to note that we cannot provide any assurance regarding when, if or how and whether the spin off of Newmark will take place. For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in forward looking statements, see Newmark Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including but not limited to the risk factors set forth from our most recent perspective and any update for such risk factors contained in subsequent Form 10 ks, Form 10Q or Form 8 ks filings.
I am happy to turn the call over to our host, Howard Letnick, Chairman of Newmark Group.
Thank you, Jason. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Newmark's Q1 2018 conference call. With me today are Newmark's CEO, Derek Gossen our Chief Operating Officer, Jim Vaccaro and our Chief Financial Officer, Mike Rispoli. Newmark had another excellent quarter, generating over 29% growth in revenues. He also generated strong adjusted EBITDA and post tax adjusted earnings, which increased by 68% 93%, respectively.
Given our success and expectation of strong growth for the full year 2018, the company's Board of Directors declared a dividend for the Q1 of $0.09 per common share. We expect our dividend to remain consistent for each of the 4 quarters of 2018. With that, I'm happy to turn the call over to Barrett.
Thanks, Howard, and good morning. Newmark's strong performance in the quarter included double digit revenue growth from leasing, capital markets, management services and global corporate services. We gained market share and investment sales in mortgage brokerage driving our year over year volume increases of 23% 62% respectively. Nearly 90% of our revenue growth for the quarter was organic. This was led by a 15% improvement in revenue per producer.
We expect our strategy of hiring top producers, providing them with technology and data and embedding them in our culture of cross selling and collaboration will enable us to continue to outpace the overall industry. As an example of our recent success, I'd like to take a moment to discuss the notable wins. Newmark was recently awarded the exclusive leasing agency for the 3,200,000 Square Foot One World Trade Center, the tallest building in the United States. We've recently advised and completed multiple significant leasing transactions around the country, including for some of the largest Internet technology, financial services, healthcare, law and accounting firms in the world. Our capital markets team recently closed iconic sales transactions, including $4,300,000,000 of multifamily assets as well as $4,200,000,000 in office, industrial and retail.
We're also very pleased with our many new global corporate service clients, including NBC Universal, Transit of America, Skyworks, Walgreens and United Technologies. These wins help illustrate the growing success of the Newmark brand and the tremendous talent of our professionals. Multifamily fundamentals remain strong with effective rents up 2.5% year on year in the quarter, NKF Research expects apartment rents to continue to rise through the end of 2019 as new supply levels off. The industrial market remains very robust. Last mile warehouses located in primary markets have seen impressive price appreciation and rent growth over the last several years, bolstered by e commerce sales activity.
Overall industry notional volumes in investment sales were up by 5% in the Q1 compared with last year, while overall U. S. Leasing activity was up by low single digits. According to NKF Research, total industry's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily new business notional volumes were down by approximately 35% and up by 3%, respectively, over the same timeframe. Berkeley Point's originations declined by 14% in notional terms year on year during the quarter.
The timing of loan originations often varies from period to period, which makes full year comparisons more effective. For example, the second quarter this year will not likely be a particularly meaningful comparison because Berkeley Point completed a very large transaction in the Q2 of 2017. As we continue to integrate our multifamily investment sales, origination and mortgage brokerage businesses, we expect further growth across our combined origination and capital markets platform. With that, I'm happy to turn the call over to Mike.
Thank you, Barry, and good morning, everyone. Newmark generated revenues of 4 $130,500,000 an increase of 29.4%. Our quarterly compensation expenses increased 17.5% to $252,700,000 while non compensation expenses increased 27% to $106,400,000 Non compensation expenses were higher as a result of the $18,400,000 of additional pass through expenses related to the implementation of ASC 606. But for this accounting change, our non compensation expenses would have risen 4.9%. The majority of our compensation expenses are variable in nature and tied directly to revenue.
While our non compensation expenses are largely fixed because of the seasonality of commercial real estate revenues, the Q1 is generally the lowest margin quarter of the year. This seasonality is typically reversed for us in the 3rd and 4th quarters making them more profitable. Turning now to our earnings. Our adjusted EBITDA before allocations to units improved by 67.8% to $79,100,000 a margin of 18.4%, which was up by approximately 4 20 basis points year on year. Our pre tax adjusted earnings for the quarter were up by 83.1 percent to $63,600,000 while our pre tax margin expanded by approximately 430 basis points to 14.8%.
Our tax rate for adjusted earnings was 13.3% for the quarter as compared to 18% in the Q1 of 2017. Our tax rate declined due to the recently enacted U. S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Our post tax earnings increased 92.8 percent to $54,400,000 Our post tax earnings per share increased 69.2 percent to $0.22 Newmark's fully diluted weighted average share count for the quarter was 246,800,000 for both GAAP and adjusted earnings.
A year earlier weighted average share count for adjusted earnings was 225,200,000. Dollars Newmark had no statistics for GAAP earnings per share prior to the IPO. Our fully diluted share count as of March 31, 2018 was $254,700,000 Including the previously reported Newmark sales to BGC of approximately $16,600,000 exchangeable units on March 7, 2018. Moving on to the balance sheet. As of quarter end, our cash and cash equivalents were $48,100,000 restricted cash was $243,900,000 long term debt was $812,500,000 and total equity was $553,700,000 The restricted cash, which is pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae includes an elective excess of $190,000,000 above the minimum required balance.
The company has chosen to maintain excess liquidity in the Fannie Mae restricted account as we believe this has a favorable impact on the company's credit profile. The change in cash and cash equivalents since year end was due in part to the company's use of $28,700,000
and the
$242,000,000 proceeds received from the unit sale to repay the remaining $270,700,000 balance of the converted term loan. The increase in total equity is largely due to the unit sale. Since the IPO, we have improved the credit profile of Newmark. The combination of our lower long term debt, higher total equity and growing adjusted EBITDA has strengthened Newmark's balance sheet and improved our credit ratios, including debt to equity and debt to adjusted EBITDA. Additionally, Newmark's balance sheet does not reflect the expected receipt of over $870,000,000 worth of additional NASDAQ stock over the next 10 years.
As these shares are contingent upon NASDAQ generating $25,000,000 in gross revenues annually. To put the $25,000,000 contingency in context, NASDAQ generated gross revenues of approximately $4,000,000,000 in 2017. I'd like to take a moment to discuss the key steps we plan to take in order to affect the tax free spin off of Newmark. First, we intend to pursue our own credit rating after BGC's credit watch has been resolved. An investment grade rating, which is our objective, would assist us in refinancing our $812,500,000 of long term debt owed to or guaranteed by BGC.
Separation from BGC is required in order for the spin off to be tax free. With that, I'm happy to turn the call back over to Barry.
Thank you, Mike. I'm happy to report that our outlook per share remains the same, while we have improved our credit metrics. Additionally, I'm happy to introduce guidance for adjusted EBITDA. Our outlook is as follows. We expect to generate revenues of between $1,900,000,000 $2,050,000,000 or an increase of 19% to 28% compared with approximately $1,600,000,000 last year.
We continue to anticipate our 2018 tax rate for adjusted earnings to be in the range of 12% to 14% versus 18% in 2017. We expect our 2018 earnings per share to be between $1.40 $1.60 as compared to $1.15 last year for an increase of 22% to 39%. We anticipate generating adjusted EBITDA before allocations to units of between $475,000,000 $525,000,000 an increase of 27% to 40% compared with approximately $374,000,000 in 2017. We expect to update our annual guidance periodically over the course of the year. Operator, we'd like
to open it up to questions.
Your first question comes from the line of Jade Rahmani with KBW. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thanks. I was wondering how you would characterize the current market environment for investment sales. And in the Q1, can you comment on whether you saw any volatility in volumes as a result of interest rate movements?
We're seeing an incredibly active market. There are lots of portfolios that are still in the market. There seems to be a portfolio premium. So we're seeing a lot of activity in that area. The interest rate environment hasn't been significant enough to overrun the liquidity available in the market.
We're seeing money come in from everywhere. So we expect it to continue.
On the Berkeley Point side, in your view, what drove the lower Fannie Mae originations, leaving aside January, which the year ago surged due to the prior year's lending caps, But generally, Fannie Mae did decline through the quarter, as you mentioned. Do you anticipate Fannie's volumes picking up and what do you think drove the lower volumes?
Well, the cap was short lived last year. There always continues to be an ebb and flow of Freddie and Fannie. Right now, Freddie is a little more aggressive based on the spreads. In my statement, the Fannie business is down 35 percent, that's an industry based decline and Freddie is up 3%. The Blend is 19%.
Our decline was 14%. We believe that, that 14% versus the 19% is due to an increased conversion of ARA sales into the Berkeley Point environment. And as we continue to embed ARA brokers and Berkeley brokers together, the likelihood of the conversion rate going up is it will consistently improve over the next periods. And we see it loosening up. And there are more pools of multifamily assets that are entering the market and we're seeing the pipeline in pools and the portfolio premium will likely to unleash some of that activity.
Question for Mike on operating cash flows, which I think you disclosed. Excluding Berkeley Point and the timing of deliveries and originations, do you have what that number would be?
Yes. It's in the press release, but it's $12,000,000 in the Q1.
Okay. $12,000,000 of operating cash flow excluding Berkeley Point?
Yes. Including the warehouse. Yes.
Thanks for taking the questions.
Next question comes from Alexander Goldfarb with Sandler. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Good morning. So, yes, first, appreciate that you provide a little bit of color on the Fannie Mae and timing of the spin. But it does remain a concern. It's been basically the main concern of investors' questions that we've been fielding for the past few months. So on the two points, first on the standing May, can you just help us understand how increased borrowings helps your credit profile?
So
when we look at our how credit rating agencies look at our credit profile for Newmark, having more cash in the restricted liquidity account should benefit Newmark, allow us to maintain investment grade as we go out and look for our own separate credit rating and lower our cost of capital over time. And I think we've talked a little bit about our intention there.
Right. But if you're borrowing more money to put it in a restricted account, so net your leverage is going up. So how does borrowing more money help on the credit side? I don't think the rating agencies are worried that you guys can't access capital. It just seems odd that they would give you a plus check mark for increasing borrowings.
Yes. When we look at our credit profile, we think that the long term benefits of having a lower cost of capital will far outweigh any additional interest expense in the short term.
Okay. And then the second question is, obviously understand that BGCP and Canner have a credit watch that they're trying to deal with. How does that impact Newmark's timing of a spin out and getting its own rating if Newmark has separate metrics? Why can't Newmark be judged on its own? Why does the parent have to get resolved first if Newmark is sort of an independent entity?
The rating agencies tend to look at the parent and it influences their outcomes. So BGC has improved its credit metrics and it has done the things necessary to meet the existing standards for investment grade from the rating agencies. So BGC does expect or is optimistic that the rating agencies will resolve the credit rating, the credit watch positively this quarter. So it's really beneficial to Newmark to have that positively resolve itself. And so when it goes into the rating agencies, there is nothing out there but positives with respect to its parent that it's spinning off from and therefore would more likely assisted in getting a investment grade rating itself.
Okay. So your view is that if BGC, it sounds like you're saying it will get resolved this quarter, meaning Q2. And is your view that then Newmark will also get an investment grade rating in the second quarter or it will take a few more quarters to get the IG rating?
Well, it is the objective of Newmark to get that investment grade rating and it would management has said that it would pursue that investment grade rating as soon as the BGC credit watch is resolved. And so hopefully if the BGC credit watch is resolved this quarter, then Newmark would begin the process of pursuing its credit rating soon after that. And so depending on when those things occur, it's not a long period of time. It truly does not it's not our expectation that it would take a quarter to get a credit rating for someone who's already been part of BDC and has already been part of that group.
Okay. I mean, hopefully everything gets resolved in due course because obviously the business is sound, investors like the business, but it's this stuff, the new the Fannie and the separation that are causing the concern. So it sounds like there's some hopeful progress there. Hopefully, it's resolved quickly, but thank you for your time.
Next question comes from Pete Christiansen with Citi. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hey, guys. Thanks for the question.
It seems like there was a breakout in the management services line. I was wondering if you could take us through some of the puts and takes there. I know you're ramping aggressively in valuation services, but are there any other areas that are notable to call out?
All the areas of management services. We do we've increased our management, our property management business. We've increased our valuation services exponentially. And we continue to ramp up on facilities management.
Okay. So we're based there with some valuation services ramp.
And then I guess it was helpful that you put out some of the compares versus the industry. It seems like you're certainly outperforming the market in investment sales and on the leasing side. I guess anecdotally, is this a function of where you're positioned regionally and by asset class or are you seeing yourself taking share from some of the other players? And if you are taking share, where do you think that's coming from?
Hiring great people, giving people the tools to succeed, having much more of a cross selling collaborative culture in an environment that in some respects because it was a little smaller, it's able to recreate. And we're winning business in geographies where we're underserved in categories where we also have been underrepresented, and we're attracting great talent.
Fair enough. Thank you.
Your next question comes from David Ridley Lane with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thank you. Just following up on that last comment of hiring great talent. What's your outlook for broker headcount additions in 2018? Should we expect to keep pace with the 5% growth here in the Q1? Yes.
We expect to keep pace. Producers that are leaders in the industry. And by hiring high revenue producers that lead the industry, it elevates the brand, elevates the platform, they work better together. The clients get the fact that we're hiring the right people and it resonates throughout the entire spectrum of Newmark Services.
Okay. And noted you did call out the tough comparison in mortgage origination volumes in the second quarter. Are you still looking for mortgage origination to be up in the 25% range in 2018?
A lot has to do with Freddie and Fannie. So barring that, we believe very strongly, if you look at ARAs, ARAs doing incredibly well. We're hiring more people in ARAs as we increase the conversion to Berkeley. We expect that to increase. So a lot of it has to do with the outside forces of Freddie and Fannie.
But we're still really optimistic about Berkeley.
Got it. I mean maybe one way of conceptualizing this is, I think you were previously talking about 25% in the context of a single digit grower. Should we expect, Berkeley Point to outperform by, let's call it, 15, 20 points relative to the market? Is that something you'd be more comfortable in going
out? I'd be comfortable with that. Absolutely.
Okay. Thank you.
Next question comes from Patrick O'Shaughnessy with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Good morning. I was wondering if you could speak to the M and A pipeline for Newmark and to what extent the timing of any acquisitions might be dependent upon the refinancing of Newmark's debt?
The pipeline is incredibly robust. We were held back by the whole IPO process. When we buy people, when we buy a company, we sign the brokers. I mean, there are those who would buy a company and allow the brokers to just be there. When we buy a company, we obligate the seller to sign up all his both owners and non sellers in the company to long term contracts.
And that is more work, but we believe that more work will lead to a better result.
Got it. And then can you talk about how we should be thinking about in modeling margins as you grow your management services businesses? I think historically those tend to be a little bit lower margin rather than leasing and capital markets. So how do you think about that changing Newmark's margin profile over time?
Well, I think you've seen our margins continue to expand over time. And the businesses that we're in such as valuation is not necessarily that much different than the leasing business. So we're growing businesses that still have margin in them, consulting, technology. I don't I see our margins continuing to expand a little bit over time and being up year over year.
Got it. And then last one for me. At the time of the Berkeley Point acquisition and since then, I think you spoke to a target of what percentage of ARA brokered transactions that Berkeley Point can provide the financing on. I don't remember the target off the top of my head, but can you remind us what that target was and how you're tracking towards that?
Well, so I guess before we fully followed it, we were 10% and last year we were 13%. In the Q1, we were close we're 18%. Our target is 40% and the industry metrics would follow that. There are those in other categories of debt that even have a higher penetration. We're not we think we have a good glide path and a good story to tell.
And as ARA increases and we've just hired a great team in Philly, we continue to hire more ARA investment sales brokers. As we hire them, we hire more originators. The combination of both will lead to more business. We think there's a good runway there and we plan to increase the penetration and increase the amount of origination.
All right, great. Very helpful. Thank you.
Next question comes from David Ridley Lane with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Sure. Just a quick one for Mike. There was a step up in the non controlling interest. Could you just provide a little color on the drivers behind that?
Sure. That's really directly related to the separation of Newmark from BGC. And at that time, Newmark limited partnership units were issued and income gets allocated to the limited partnership units and it runs through that particular line item. So that's new directly resulting from the change in the structure.
Okay. And should we expect a similar level going forward? Or what's the right way to think about that going forward?
Yes, I think that that's fair to think about it as a similar level as a percentage of the earnings.
Got it. Thank you very much.
At this time, I will turn the call over to the presenters.
Thank you very much. We look forward to seeing all of you again.