Earnings Call: Q3 2020

Oct 30, 2020

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Portland General Electric Company's 3rd Quarter 2020 Earnings Results Conference Call. Today is Friday, October 30, 2020. The call is being recorded and as such all lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer period. For opening remarks, I will turn the conference call over to Portland General Electric's Senior Director of Investor Relations, Jardan Jaramillo. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you, Jimmy. Good morning, everyone. I'm pleased that you're able to join us today. Before we begin this morning, I'd like to remind you that we have prepared a presentation to supplement our discussion, which we'll be referencing throughout the call. The slides are available on our website at investors. Dot cortlandgeneral.com. Referring to Slide 2, some of our remarks this morning will constitute forward looking statements. We caution you that such statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. For a description of some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, please refer to our earnings press release and our most recent periodic reports on Forms 10 ks and 10 Q, which are available on our website. Leading our discussion today are Maria Pope, President and CEO and Jim Lobdell, Senior Vice President of Finance, CFO and Treasurer. Following their prepared remarks, we will open the line for your questions. Now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Maria. Thanks, Sheridon, and thank you all for joining us today. I hope that you and your families are staying safe and healthy during what continues to be a very challenging time. Portland General and all of us here have been put to the test several times this quarter. Our team has tackled difficult issues head on and took swift actions. I'd like to discuss each of these two events. First, at the end of August, we announced that energy trading activity in certain wholesale electricity markets would result in significant losses. Upon learning of the issue, our Board of Directors immediately formed a special committee to review the energy trading situation. This review is ongoing. At the time, our team worked quickly and in early September, we announced that we no longer had net market exposure. I want to make 2 things clear. This effect of trading losses was isolated to the Q3 and the trading losses had no impact on our operations. 2nd, we experienced one of the most destructive wildfire seasons on record. In responding to the wildfires, the entire organization demonstrated resilience and unwavering focus on customer safety. At the onset of the historic windstorm and high risk wildfire conditions, we worked in partnership with local authorities and emergency responders to proactively shut off power in several high risk areas. During the course of the week, we not only enacted public safety power shutoffs, but we also restored power to about 250,000 customers. Over the last several years, our investments in new resources, vegetation management as well as inspection and maintenance of our equipment enabled us to act swiftly, which helps emergency responders safely fight the wildfires. We continue to invest in improving our system, including steel poles, substation upgrades, distribution automation and other equipment. These and other initiatives build on our strong operational foundation. With growing demand in the Pacific Northwest, these needs are more important now than ever. Our vision for a clean energy future drives our strategy. There's a clear need for urgency in addressing climate change and to meet our customers' desire to be served with increasingly clean, renewable energy program in the United States with over 25% of customers buying 100% green energy. Today, we have a number of projects and initiatives underway. Our agreement with Avangra to source power from the largest solar facility in Oregon will serve an equivalent of 40,000 homes. We're furthering our investment in battery storage, testing several projects across our service territory. Between the Wheatridge wind, solar and battery storage project and these other investments, we have a lot of important work underway throughout our state. With year to date earnings of $1.15 we're on track to finish at the upper end of our guidance range of $1.40 to $1.60 per share. Our underlying operations remain strong, and we continue to find efficiencies and reduce costs throughout our organization. Finally, I want to recognize the hard work of our coworkers and first responders who in the middle of a pandemic went above and beyond to protect our community. Before I turn the call over to Jim, I would like to take a moment to thank him. As I'm sure many of you have seen yesterday afternoon, we announced that after a long and successful career at PGE, Jim plans to retire at the end of the year. I can't overstate what Jim has done for PGE throughout his 30 year career at the company. He actively lives our company values and his dedication and leadership have been instrumental in driving financial improvements and strategic initiatives. Jim is well recognized as a leader across the West and played an important role alongside other utility leaders in creating the Western Wholesale Financial Power Markets. On a personal note, his camaraderie and counsel have meant the world to me and the officer team. In connection with Jim's retirement, Jim Adjelo, the former Executive Vice President and CFO of Hawaiian Electric Industries, has been appointed Senior Advisor effective November 30. He'll step into the CFO role on January 1. We are excited to have Jim on board. We also announced that Brett Sims, our Senior Director of Strategy, Commercial and Regulatory Affairs has been appointed Vice President of Strategy, Planning and Energy Supply effective today. A top priority for Jim and me as well as the entire management team is to ensure a smooth transition. Finally, I want to add that we're pleased to welcome Michael Lewis and Jim Torgerson to our Board of Directors. Both Michael and Jim bring valuable skills and extensive utility experience that will support our efforts to ensure a clean energy future for Oregonians. And now let me turn it over to Jim. Thank you. Thank you, Marie, and thank you for those comments, and good morning, everyone. Before we discuss our financial results, I'd like to recognize the resiliency and focus the company has maintained throughout this quarter's challenges, ensuring that we deliver on our commitments and continue to invest in safe, clean, reliable and affordable energy for our customers. Turning to Slide 6, I'll walk through our quarter over quarter results. As Maria mentioned earlier, our earnings this quarter were impacted by the losses associated with our energy trading activity. Despite this impact, our core operational results were strong, and there were several items to highlight. For the walk, I'll start with $0.61 for the Q3 of 2019. Excluding the impact of the energy trading loss on our purchase power and fuel expense, gross margin decreased by $0.09 This includes a $0.02 increase in total revenues, retail deliveries increased 4% compared to the Q3 of 2019 as deliveries to both residential and industrial customer showed considerable growth over the prior year. The impacts of increased residential usage are largely offset by the decoupling mechanism. Commercial deliveries, which declined, exceeded their 2% on collections this quarter. In 2021, our decoupling mechanism will reset again. This increase in revenue was offset by an $0.11 decrease attributable to higher power costs, partially driven by an increase in the average price for purchased power. 2nd, there's an $0.11 increase for lower plants and transmission and distribution operating expense, which was primarily driven by reductions in outside services, increased capital work relative to O and M and reduced maintenance at our generation facilities. 3rd, a $0.12 increase from reduced administrative and general expenses, which includes a $0.06 increase from expenses that did not reoccur primarily associated with the stabilization of our billing system in 2019, a $0.06 increase from lower administrative expenses due to reduced incentives and health insurance premiums, a $0.04 increase due to the efficiencies at Boardman as we finalized operations leading up to the coal fired plants shutdown in October. Next, a $0.04 increase in other income from AFDC equity associated with ongoing construction of our integrated operations center in Wheatridge facilities and an increase in non qualified benefit trust from investment returns. There was a $0.05 increase from lower tax expense, primarily driven by lower pretax book income following revisions to our forecast after the impact of the energy trading losses. Finally, there was a $0.02 increase from lower miscellaneous expense. Energy trading losses represented a negative impact of $1.09 per diluted share. This amount represents the $127,000,000 impact from the energy trading losses net of $30,000,000 tax impact in the quarter. This brings our GAAP net income to a loss of $0.19 per diluted share. After adjusting for the impact of the trading losses, non GAAP earnings per diluted share was $0.90 Onto a regulatory update. Last week, the Oregon Public Utility Commission approved 2 of our outstanding deferrals. First, the commission approved our application for deferral of certain incremental costs related to COVID-nineteen. The final stipulation among parties related to the deferral has been filed with the commission. The stipulation includes dates from for restarting disconnects late fees and extended time payment agreements. 2nd, the commission approved the deferral for incremental O and M and capital expenses related to the September wildfire events. We are continuing to assess the damage to our system and expect additional O and M and capital costs related to the wildfires to be assessed or to be addressed by the deferral. Also, we received an order approving a renewable adjustment clause for the Wheatridge Energy Facility. The commission found that we acted prudently in our decision to select the facility in consultation with the independent evaluator. The project is scheduled to go into service by end of this year. Regarding our future resource needs, we plan to issue 1 or more RFPs for new non emitting resources in the first half of next year and plan to file an IRP update before the end of 2020. On to Slide 7. Our balance sheet remains strong and has the capacity necessary to continue to invest to serve our customers. As of September 30, 2020, we had $918,000,000 in available short term credit, letter of credit capacity and cash and $688,000,000 of 1st mortgage bond issuance capacity. We plan to further strengthen our liquidity position by issuing up to $230,000,000 of long term debt securities later this quarter with net proceeds being used for general corporate purposes and repayment of short term debt borrowings. We expect to fund the remainder of the 2020 capital requirements with cash from operations and the issuance of commercial paper as needed. Moving on to Slide 8, which shows our updated capital forecast. We added $100,000,000 to our capital forecast for investments that prioritize the reliability and resiliency of our system while minimizing customer prices. Recent weeks have demonstrated the importance of maintaining a safe and reliable grid as our system continued to perform despite facing the challenges of high wind and wildfire events. As Murray had mentioned, we're reaffirming our full year 2020 guidance of $1.40 to $1.60 per share. For 2020, we're expecting to finish in the top half of our earnings guidance. We're also reaffirming our long term EPS growth of 4% to 6% and establishing 2019 as the base year for this guidance. This growth is supported by our continued focus on long term benefits for our customers of decarbonizing our power supply, electrifying the economy and delivering strong operational results to ensure safe, clean and affordable energy. And now, operator, we're ready for questions. Thank you. Our Our first question comes from Insoo Kim with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Good morning. Thank you. Good morning. Jim, congrats and best of luck in the next phase. Thank you. First question is on timing of rate case, given the COVID and the wildfire deferral helped you stabilize the earnings trajectory somewhat. What are your latest thoughts on potential timing of the next general rate case? And in a scenario where you file or do not file in the next year or so, do you anticipate any need for equity? Insoo, we always evaluate on an annual basis whether there is a need for a general rate case on a foreign forward basis. And we're continuing to do that evaluation. As you know, we are making significant investments in our system on behalf of customers and we will have those deferrals out there. But we will most likely, if there is any news to be shared regarding generate case, you'll probably hear that in our Q4 call. And then so we have no need for any equity financing. Understood. And there's a little more specific, Jim, but on the just for the balance of the year, based on the guidance to be at the upper half, that implies 4Q to be meaningfully lower just on a year over year basis or based on what you've been earning in the previous few years in the Q4. Besides potentially demand for COVID or net variable power cost differences, what else is driving some of that? Well, you have to keep in mind that while revenues are doing well, when you get to the 4th quarter, as we've kind of pointed out in our comments, you've got several drivers that are going on. One is the decoupling mechanism has really kicked in, in full force. We have a 2% cap on the amount of collections that we can do from customers. And you look at the residential side, it's basically being decoupled away. And on the commercial side, we've hit that cap and now we're absorbing the continued decrease in commercial loads. The other thing is that on the power cost size, we've always pointed out, we were way down below the baseline in prior quarters and now we're moving up into the deadbands. And that really is being driven by flows of energy in the market given the fact that there's been some transmission that's been taken out of the marketplace and caused some constraints along with hydro. And then we moved the outage associated with the Khosstrup facility from earlier in the year into the Q4. So you've got that. And then the other items are a bunch of miscellaneous ones associated with things like the COVID deferral, because of the fact that we cannot do disconnects until we get, let's see, for commercial till the 1st December and then in April of next year when we get to residential that we can't charge late fees. Late fees have always been part of our revenue on all the prior quarters that we have out there. And then as I mentioned, there's a bunch of miscellaneous stuff. Obviously, we're incurring some additional costs associated with this review by the special committee and in defending ourselves in the upcoming lawsuits that we're anticipating regarding the trading that was going on. Got it. Thank you for that detail. And just one more if I could. Maria, it seems like based on Q3 year over year commercial load declines, it was definitely a little more muted than what we saw in the Q2. Can you describe a little bit what you're seeing on the ground on the small commercial side in your neighborhood? Great. Thank you. So with regards to commercial, it did decline much more rapidly in the beginning of the pandemic and we have seen less decline of late. I think it's too early to call. Clearly, there's a rise in cases across the country and Oregon is no different. What we are really pleased with is to see the continued increase in industrial customers. Last quarter as we talked about, industrial growth can be lumpy. We had good growth in the 2nd quarter and that industrial growth continued to be very strong in the 3rd quarter, up about 9% on a weather adjusted basis. So overall, we continue to be very optimistic about the growth in our service territory, both as a result of in migration, which drives residential and somewhat commercial, but more importantly around industrial high-tech data centers and many of the additional customers that we're seeing come into the area. Got it. Thank you both. Thank you. Thanks, Jin Hsu. Thank you. Our next question comes from Julien Dumoulin Smith with Bank of America. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning, team. Thanks for the time and Jim, best of luck here. Thank you, Julian. Absolutely, it's been a pleasure. I wanted to come back to this Board review process, if we could talk about just a little bit more on the timeframe on that. And perhaps even more importantly, can you talk about your sense as to any potential process at the Oregon TUC and where that may stand now, specifically as it relates to trading loss, but frankly more broadly, if there's anything on the wildfire front we should be watching too? Sure. So thank you, Julian. And as I noted, the special committee's review is ongoing. We'll make sure that it's thorough and then we get to the bottom of all that took place and we'll make sure that we're transparent as we learn more. So I don't have anything more with regards to timing on that. I would imagine that the PUC and Chair Decker will take the appropriate actions to ensure confidence in customer pricing and our risk management philosophies. I would say with regards to wildfire recovery, with regards to COVID recovery, with regards to overall proceedings at the PUC, there's a number of dockets it's very active and we continue to work constructively with all parties. And we're very pleased that the commission acted so swiftly when it came to wildfires. That was greatly appreciated. There's no question about it. It was an unprecedented event. And we are fortunate to have taken swift action to have prevented any we know of no none of our equipment that contributed to any of the wildfires. Got it. Yes, saw that in the queue. Just a quick clarification here, if I can, just a couple of details, important ones. The baseline 2019 that's actual or is it something else? And then separately, what's the thought process on the balance of the previous reduction in the CapEx? Is there a prospect to bring that back or just curious the $100,000,000 versus $180,000,000 So let me let Jim address to you the details around exactly our base for our forecast. But please know that we heard you and other investors wanting more granular detail with regards to our 4% to 6 percent long term growth rates. And when we look at our capital, we are very attuned to the impact in customer prices, But we also recognize that we are lucky to have significant customer growth in our area and new capital needs to support that customer growth. And then in addition, investments in infrastructure that's aging, wildfire resiliency and others. So as projects come up as we continue to plan, there may be additional amounts, but at this point in time, it's too early to call. We are very focused on ensuring customer prices remain low and affordable across our area. So Jim, do you want to talk a little bit more about the baseline? Yes. Julien, in the 2019, we chose that because that was the last general rate case that we have been through. And so that provides a cleaner look when you're trying to forecast on a forward basis. And as Maria pointed out, the capital, I mean, we've got a lot of growth going on in the service territory with additional minimum load agreements being signed by customers, increases in the digital space and just overall in migration. I mean, we have a shortage of housing in the State of Oregon and that is keeping a lot of people busy as homes are being bid up very, very quickly. So great amount of demand here and that's really showing up in our numbers. Got it. Excellent. All right. I'll leave it there. Thank you all very much. Thanks, Julian. Ciao. Our next question comes from Sophie Kark with KeyBanc. Your line is now open. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. This is Sanjita on for Sophie. Good morning. Good morning. So if you could give us a little bit more color on the magnitude of the wildfire costs that you will be deferring, What the recovery mechanisms are in the State of Oregon? If you plan to follow-up into your GRC or if it's going to be a success proceeding? Any color on that would be greatly helpful. Yes. When it comes to the wildfires, we're about $10,000,000 in cost right now. The mechanism is a 12 month period that the deferral runs. We are currently trying to assess the additional damage to some of our transmission lines that they're out in rural areas. And so we don't have cost estimates associated with those at this particular point in time. So there's more to be figured out. So there's more capital that we're anticipating that we're going to have to spend to recover some of this infrastructure and we'll know those numbers when we get done with those assessments. And a little bit more on that. Do you think you're going to fold it into a GRC? Or is it more likely to be a separate proceeding? If this would be separate, the fact that it is a deferral at this particular point in time, the period of recovery hasn't been determined as of yet. You. Our next question comes from Anthony Cardo with Mizuho. Your line is now open. Hey, good morning. Good morning. Good morning. Congratulations. Best of luck in the next phase. Great career with 36 years at Portland. Thank you. It's been a long haul. Apologies for just looking to get more in the weeds on the guidance. But just to follow-up on Julien's question earlier, The base is 2019, I have earnings in 2019 at $2.39 and the thought is that every year post 2019, it's going to be between that 4% to 6% growth. It's not something that some will be out, some will be above. It's each year will fall within that range? Correct. Great. And then if I could transition to O and M. This quarter, I think I lost what slide I looked at. On the waterfall chart there, it sort of was $0.20 something you guys took for not only distribution and transmission, O and M savings, but also some G and A savings. Is that something we can bake in more sustainable going forward? Sure. As Jim mentioned, there were a number of issues that took place in the quarter that were favorable and some issues that were just reflective of significant moves like our coal strip outage. So while we have made significant productivity and performance improvements across our operations, we had a particularly good quarter this year and you're going to need to sort of look a little bit more long term as the improvements relate to investments in capital, they relate to investments in technology and those don't necessarily just all happen all at once, but they take a while to really become embedded in our operations. So I would we're grateful for the great Q3 O and M experience, but muted as we move forward and really focused on continuing to improve our operating performance and productivity. Great. And then just lastly on the trading loss, just thinking about what anything that you could talk about that has maybe changed like who do trading report to, who does it report to now Or any type of safeguards that are in place now versus what was there before? And I know there's a report coming out or there's an independent review, but I'm just curious what you could tell us now. Sure. So first of all, as I noted and we've been very clear on, we move very swiftly to consolidate and isolate the events associated with the trading losses and their impact is just to the Q3. We have made a number of reporting changes and taken other actions. First and foremost, as I mentioned in my remarks with regards to Jim's career, he has extensive knowledge across the Western power markets and our power operations currently reports to him. Risk management in the company reports to myself and we have brought in an outside We look forward to the report being finalized We look forward to the report being finalized. I promise you no more Jim and I as much as our Board of Directors and we will be transparent with our findings. Jim, anything else you want to add? No. Just to clarify that these management changes where power operations reports to me is something that happened post the event. Yes. Okay, great. And lastly, just will that report be issued to investors or is that just something that will stay internal to the Board? I don't know how the Board will handle that. It's up to them and their decision making. But please know that they will are proceeding through a thorough process. Great. Maria, James, thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Brian Russo with Sidoti. Your line is now open. Good morning, Brian. Hi, good morning. Just to follow-up on the CapEx question, the $100,000,000 of incremental CapEx that you're laying in for 2021, are you essentially just adding back what was reduced in April? And how does that kind of play into maybe an improving economic outlook in your service territory from April? Well, Brian, you've got it spot on. Those are hand in hand. We're continuing to see growth in the service territory. As I mentioned earlier, we've got strong residential growth that's going on, strong housing market in migration and then a lot of growth in the digital space. And then we continue to invest in the resiliency and aging infrastructure that we have in the system. And then what isn't there is there is no amount associated with any renewable resources that we plan on adding to the system if they were to come out of the RFP process. And then we've still got investments in the restoration of the system associated with the wildfires. So we will as we've always done, we will evaluate it on a quarterly basis. We have a gating process that I've mentioned previously that we're making sure that every project goes through the diligence phase before it gets moved forward to be included in our SEC capital expenditure updates. Okay. Got it. And then just on the Q4 year over year, looks like headwind in power supply costs. I think according to the Q as of September you were $27,000,000 below the baseline and the comments that you'll be within the debt band range. So the 27 $1,000,000 below will go to at least $15,000,000 below, but above 0 but still below 0. Is that the way to look at it? Yes. And one thing I want to note is that we closed Oregon's only coal fired generation facility a number of days ago. So the Boardman plant has ceased its operations. We've also seen higher gas prices throughout the Pacific Northwest as a result of pipeline issues in Canada and elsewhere. And we're watching the hydro and precipitation issues pretty closely. Jim, anything else you want to add? No. Brian, I think you've got the math right. We, on a year to date basis, dollars 27,000,000 below and then we will be up near the base somewhere in the collar or by year end. Right. Got it. So your guidance for 2020 includes anywhere between $15,000,000 of power supply cost benefits for the year? Yes, that's correct. Okay. And then just one more clarification. Did you guys defer $6,000,000 of bad debt expense in the 3rd quarter? So that $6,000,000 did not hit the expense line. Is that the way to look at it? Or is that still pending to be deferred? Well, in our general rate case we generally assume about $6,000,000 worth of bad debt. We had talked previously about debt expense that we would be incurring and we are now deferring. And the amount associated with our deferral right now is probably around the $8,000,000 range. Okay. But in the 3rd quarter reported results, you were still expensing the bad debt expense, correct? Yes. Yes. Got it. Okay. Thank you very much and good luck, Jim. Okay. Thank you, Brian. Thank you. And our next question comes from Travis Miller with Morningstar. Your line is now open. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. And again, I'll echo Jim, congratulations and best of luck. Thank you, Travis. Wanted a little bit more on the trading losses. One, I'm thinking, how should we think about putting that number in perspective relative to your purchase power costs and other fuel costs? Is this something that would be put in perspective over a quarter or over a year, over a couple of years? How should we think about that $127,000,000 in terms of that would be after tax rate relative to the $292,000,000 purchase power cost in the quarter $5.54 over the 9 months. Can you give me a sense of that? So thank you, Travis. And the event is isolated does not relate to our ongoing power operations. The number of $127,000,000 is a pre tax number. And the EPS impact to the Q3 is $1.09 Yes. Just know that those positions were all closed and netted in that quarter. So there would be no carryover to the Q4 from a market exposure. Okay. And were these when you say confined to the quarter, were these costs and trading losses that happened during the quarter or they were just booked in the quarter from past over a series of quarters? I'm trying to think about this in terms of your overall purchase power cost. Yes. They were realized 100% in the 3rd quarter. Okay. So thinking about the number would be relative to that $292,000,000 of booked purchase power costs. Is that fair? Yes, that's how I would look at it. Okay. Okay. And then you mentioned potential legal action. Do you have legal recourse to anything related to those trading losses, any chance of recovering not from customers, but recovering through legal means, any of that money? So we were very clear that we're not recovering these costs from customers. In our 10 Q, we note that we have received a couple of lawsuits and have disclosed those. Okay. And Pajid, those are lawsuits against you guys or you're filing lawsuits against the people? No, those are lawsuits against us. Okay. Do you have any legal recourse against the people who were doing the trading losses, who made the trading losses? So the investigation is ongoing. Okay. Okay. Very good. And then any chance in discussions with the PUC about putting in some kind of wildfire mitigation plan, like obviously your neighbors to the south have stuff like that. Any thoughts on doing capital through a designated program going forward? Sure. So the Oregon Public Utility Commission has been leaning into the risks around wildfire for some time. 1 of the commissioners was a leader across the West in convening forums with regards to equipment, insurance, power safety shutoffs, really bringing together the best mines across the West and even there is collaboration with Australia and others as we figure out what the right thing to do is. We have taken a number of actions over the last couple of years to ensure that we'll grow prepared, that we've invested adequately in equipment and that work will continue and we'll continue to work collaboratively with all stakeholders, including the commission. Okay. Would you be interested in putting together some kind of multiyear plan, capital investment plan? Yes, I mean we do as you can imagine in running a utility, most of the things that we do are multi year in nature and pretty extensive as we have infrastructure throughout our service territory. Okay, great. Thank you very much. Thanks, Rose. Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Maria Pope for any closing remarks. Thank you very much for joining us today. We look forward to continuing the conversation with those of you who will participate in EEI's virtual meetings. And then we also look forward to talking with you in February as we close out the Q4. So thank you very much and thank you, Jim. Thank you. Congratulations. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation on today's conference. This does conclude your program and you may now