Welcome to RPM International's conference call for the fiscal 2021 third quarter. Today's call is being recorded. This call is also being webcast and can be accessed live or replayed on the RPM website at www.rpminc.com. Comments made on this call may include forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to be materially different. For more information on these risks and uncertainties, please review RPM's reports filed with the SEC. During this conference call, references may be made to non-GAAP financial measures. To assist you in understanding these non-GAAP terms, RPM has posted reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures on the RPM website. Following today's presentation, there will be a question and answer session, at which time, if you wish to ask a question, you will need to press star, then one on your telephone.
Please note that only financial analysts will be permitted to ask questions. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to RPM's Chairman and CEO, Mr. Frank Sullivan, for opening remarks. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Michelle. Good morning and welcome to the RPM International Inc. investor call for our fiscal 2021 third quarter ended February 28, 2021. Joining me on the call today are Rusty Gordon, RPM's Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Matt Ratajczak, our Vice President of Global Tax and Treasury, who is also supporting our investor relations activities. Before we begin, I'd like to note that yesterday I received my second COVID-19 vaccine shot. I've encouraged our associates to get vaccinated, I recommend the same to everyone listening to this call. It's the only way we can all do our part to end the pandemic and return to normalcy and reinvigorate the global economy.
I'll start today's call by summarizing the factors that drove our strong financial performance for the quarter and how we were able to overcome the disruption caused by Winter Storm Uri that hit the U.S. in February. I'll discuss how we are utilizing our record cash from operations and provide an update on our MAP to Growth operating improvement program. I'll turn the call over to Matt, who will review our third quarter results in more detail. Rusty Gordon will conclude our formal remarks with the outlook for our fourth quarter. You'll recall, in mid-February, Winter Storm Uri blanketed nearly 75% of the U.S. in snow, which disrupted transportation, distribution, and supply chains.
In anticipation of severe transportation gridlock, the potential of losing multiple shipping days in North America, which makes up 70% of our revenue, and the desire to maintain transparent communications with our investors, we lowered our third quarter guidance on February 18th. The third quarter is our seasonally low quarter and historically generates only 5%-10% of our annual earnings, so the magnitude of relatively small changes in earnings becomes magnified. However, in the end, through the extraordinary measures of our associates as well as the fact that plants, distribution centers, and transportation network resumed operations more quickly than we anticipated, we were able to catch up and execute delivery of most of our customer orders in the final week of February, which enabled us to exceed our original third quarter sales and earnings guidance. For the quarter, we generated record consolidated sales, earnings, and cash from operations.
Sales grew 8.1%, with 4.9% being due to organic initiatives, 2.1% resulting from acquisitions, and 1.1% as a result of favorable foreign exchange. Internationally, Europe and Canada showed good growth as well. Latin America showed growth in local currencies but was flat when its results were translated back into U.S. dollars. Much like last quarter, three of our four operating segments generated solid sales growth and significant leverage to the EBIT line due to our MAP to Growth operating improvement program benefits while being leveraged to the bottom line as we've done for the last eight quarters. This was particularly impressive given the supply chain challenges and difficult comparison to last year's third quarter, when our adjusted EBIT increased 30.4%.
On a segment basis, our Specialty Products Group led the way with organic growth of 13.4% in the quarter and produced a second consecutive quarter of double-digit top line and bottom line growth. Our Consumer Group also generated double-digit organic growth as it continued to benefit from strong DIY demand. The Construction Products Group again generated solid sales and significant EBIT growth in challenging market conditions by focusing on infrastructure, which encompasses about 15% of RPM's consolidated sales, and its strong performance in repair and renovation. Results in our Performance Coatings Group declined due to difficult conditions in its primary end markets. Matt Ratajczak will cover the segment results in more detail in a minute. We continue to prove why RPM is the best home for entrepreneurial businesses in our industry with two acquisitions in March.
These include the Tuff Coat line of rubberized non-skid coatings used for aquatic applications, which is a great strategic fit with our Recreational Marine Products group, and Bison Innovative Products, a manufacturer of raised flooring systems that will operate as part of our Fibergrate business. We have taken a more collaborative view of our manufacturing footprint as we add capacity. For example, to meet the Consumer Group's explosive growth for its products, we are installing packaging and blending equipment at plants in our Performance Coatings Group and Specialty Products Group. This is in addition to capital spending in our Consumer Group facilities, which includes new filling capacity for Consumer Group plants, with particular emphasis on meeting the increased demand for small project paints, caulk, and sealants in our repair categories.
Other investments in our operations include new presses and injection molding equipment to meet surging orders for our Nudura ICF products and wall systems, and the construction of a new liquid applied roof coatings plant. I'd now like to discuss our MAP to Growth restructuring program, which continues to pay dividends. During the quarter and so far in the fourth quarter, we announced the closure of two plants, which brings our total to 27 of the 31 plants that we originally targeted for consolidation at the beginning of the MAP to Growth program. As discussed last quarter, we continue to be more efficient in utilizing our manufacturing assets to generate cost-saving opportunities. The benefits of our center-led procurement initiatives are becoming even more evident in the current inflationary raw material environment. Rusty Gordon will provide more color on this when he walks through our fourth quarter outlook.
Lastly, in the G&A area, we continue to consolidate IT systems and accounting and finance operations. At the end of our fiscal year, May 31, 2021, we expect to exceed the original MAP to Growth program's planned run rate of $290 million in annualized savings. The program's learnings of continuous improvement and efficiency have become ingrained in our culture, and we will continue to add to our robust pipeline of cost savings initiatives and operational improvements. As we sustain the efficiency gains achieved through MAP to Growth, we are now shifting more focus and resources towards top-line growth through internal investments and acquisitions. Our goal is to return to the exceptional revenue growth rates that have been one of the hallmarks of RPM's success since its founding in 1947.
I'll now turn the call over to Matt Ratajczak for a detailed review of our financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2021.
Thanks, Frank, and good morning, everyone. Note that my comments will be on an as-adjusted basis. During the third quarter, we generated consolidated net sales of $1.27 billion, an increase of 8.1% compared to the $1.17 billion reported during the same quarter of fiscal 2020. As Frank mentioned, organic sales growth was 4.9%, or $58 million. Acquisitions contributed 2.1% of sales, or $24.5 million, while foreign exchange was a tailwind that increased sales by 1.1%, or $12.9 million. This was strong top-line growth during the third quarter, which typically generates our most modest results each year because it falls during the winter months when painting and construction activity slow. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $0.38, an increase of 65.2% compared to $0.23 in the year-ago quarter. Our consolidated adjusted EBIT was up 32.2% to $79.9 million, compared to $60.5 million reported in the fiscal 2020 third quarter.
These excellent results were largely due to initiatives under our MAP to Growth restructuring program and our ability to leverage higher sales to the bottom line. Turning now to our segments. Sales in our Construction Products Group were strong and increased 6.4% to $396 million. Growth was primarily organic at 5.4%, or $20.3 million. Foreign currency translation increased sales by 1%, or $3.6 million. With softness in commercial and institutional construction markets, our Construction Products Group remained focused on renovation and restoration projects, leading to solid sales growth during the quarter. Our roofing business performed well, as did our new Nudura insulated concrete forms, or ICFs, which are experiencing accelerated long-term adoption as a wall system as the lumber supply has tightened and prices have skyrocketed. The ICFs also provide the benefits of improved energy efficiency and structural integrity.
Adjusted EBIT in the Construction Products Group increased 206.4% to $18.5 million from $6 million during last year's third quarter. The group generated 310 basis points of adjusted EBIT margin growth due to MAP to Growth savings and the favorable leverage of sales volume increases. The segment's European businesses continue to improve as a result of ongoing restructuring and better product mix. During the quarter, challenging market trends persisted for our Performance Coatings Group, including weak energy demand that impacted industrial coatings and COVID-19 protocols that continued to restrict access to facilities for flooring system installations. Sales in this segment were $226.5 million, an 11.4% decrease from the $255.7 million reported during last year's third quarter. Organic sales decreased 12.7%, or $32.4 million. Foreign exchange provided a tailwind of 1.3%, or $3.2 million. Segment adjusted EBIT decreased 41.6% to $14.1 million from $24.2 million during last year's third quarter.
Lower sales volumes and pricing pressures resulted in earnings de-leveraging, which was offset in part by discretionary cost cuts and MAP to Growth savings. As vaccines are administered and the impact of the pandemic diminishes, we expect the segment to rebound as its industrial customers catch up on maintenance and energy markets recover, in part due to increased travel. In the Consumer Group, sales were robust, increasing 19.8% to $477.7 million. Organic sales increased 12.7%, or $50.4 million, and acquisitions increased sales by 6.1%, or $24.5 million. Foreign currency translation increased sales by 1%, or $4.1 million. The Consumer Group continued to capitalize on the positive DIY home improvement market trend by leveraging its broad distribution and market leadership in caulk, sealants, cleaners, abrasives, and small project paints. Similar to the U.S., the segment's international results were equally robust in Europe and Canada.
Adjusted EBIT in the Consumer Group was $47.8 million, an increase of 48.6% over the prior year. Adjusted EBIT margin improved as a result of MAP to Growth savings and a leveraging of higher sales volumes, which offset rising distribution expenses. Results in our Specialty Products Group were a record and improved dramatically for the second consecutive quarter. Fiscal 2021 third quarter net sales increased 14.7% to $169.2 million from $147.5 million in the fiscal 2020 third quarter. Organic sales growth was 13.4%, driven by more aggressive business development efforts and growth investments initiated by new management, as well as improving market conditions for many of its businesses. In particular, our restoration equipment business, driven by extreme weather events in North America, experienced excellent top-line growth, as did our businesses serving the furniture, outdoor recreational equipment, food, cleaning, disinfecting, and OEM markets. Favorable foreign currency translation added 1.3% to sales.
Adjusted EBIT was $25.3 million during the quarter, an increase of 44.2% compared to adjusted EBIT of $17.5 million in last year's quarter. The Specialty Products Group was able to drive MAP to Growth savings and operating leverage from higher sales volumes to the bottom line. Next, a few comments on our liquidity. Our year-to-date cash flow from operations improved by $270.7 million, or 71%, over last fiscal year to a record of $651.9 million as a result of continued better working capital management, where all components of working capital improved as compared to the prior year, and margin improvement from our MAP to Growth program. At the quarter's end, our total liquidity was $1.4 billion. Our net leverage ratio, as calculated under our bank agreements, was 2.13 on February 28, 2021, which was a significant improvement as compared to 2.90 a year ago.
Our balance sheet remains strong, and we've strategically deployed our record cash flow to reduce debt. Simultaneously, we are completing acquisitions and making investments to improve the efficiency of our operations. Additionally, we repurchased approximately $24.6 million of stock during the quarter. I'll now turn the call over to Rusty for our outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2021.
Thanks, Matt. The fourth quarter is seasonally our strongest and started off well in March. However, several macroeconomic factors are creating inflationary and supply pressures on some of our product categories. These factors include supplier refineries operating at lower levels due to low fuel demand, the disruption Winter Storm Uri caused on supply chains, intermittent supplier plant shutdowns in response to the pandemic, and significant worldwide demand for packaging, solvents, and chemicals used in cleaning products. We expect that these increased costs will be reflected in our results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021 and more significantly during fiscal 2022. We are moving aggressively to offset these increased costs with commensurate selling price increases. Fortunately, due to our MAP to Growth program, we are in a much better position to weather these challenges than we were three years ago when the last inflationary cycle occurred.
With a stronger partnership with our supplier base and longer-term contracts, we are working with our supplier partners to secure necessary raw materials and control costs to whatever extent possible. In addition, our improved center-led processes and systems are providing more timely and actionable information to address these challenges. We are also working in collaboration with customers through these supply chain difficulties. On a segment-by-segment basis, we are encouraged by the following. Number one, resumption of discussions on federal action on an infrastructure program, as well as municipal funding in the recent federal COVID-19 stimulus bill that should support building maintenance in major end markets of our Construction Products Group. Number two, the resumption of travel and the recent rebound in energy markets give us optimism that our industrial protective coatings business in our Performance Coatings Group may have bottomed out as they start to lap into easier comparisons.
Number three, the increasing re-entry of home improvement professionals into the market as more consumers become vaccinated and welcome outside contractors back into their homes, which will benefit our Consumer Group. Number four, high demand in our Specialty Products Group for its Legend Brands restoration equipment and solutions, which resulted from the property damage caused by Winter Storm Uri. While it disrupted many of our other businesses, the storm provided revenues for Legend Brands in February and a backlog of more orders in the fourth quarter as we help our customers respond to this natural disaster. As we look ahead to our fourth quarter and beyond, there is currently a great deal of volatility around input costs and uncertainty regarding material availability.
While our third quarter earnings did not reflect recent material cost spikes due to our FIFO inventory methodology, inflation will likely be significant in our fourth quarter and into the first quarter of fiscal 2022. We have been, and are in the process of implementing appropriate price increases and changes in terms which we anticipate will offset the inflationary impact by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2022. There is also much uncertainty related to the breadth and speed at which global economies reopen as people become vaccinated. Based on the information available to us today, we expect our fiscal 2021 fourth quarter sales to increase by double digits compared to the fiscal 2020 fourth quarter. Last year's fourth quarter should prove to be an easier revenue comparison because it was heavily impacted by the onset of the pandemic.
Our earnings comparison versus last year, on the other hand, will be more challenging because of raw material inflation, as well as an extraordinary situation last year when our non-operating segment reported a profit due to lower travel and medical expenses, incentive reversals, and other factors. As a result, our fourth quarter adjusted EBIT is expected to increase double digits, but below the rate of sales growth. Excluding our non-operating segment, adjusted EBIT for our four operating segments in total is expected to increase by more than 20%. This concludes our formal comments. We will now be pleased to take your questions.
At this time if anybody would like to ask a question please press star one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from Frank Mitsch from Fermium Research. Your line is open.
Good morning.
Good morning, Frank, as well. Congrats on your second shot. I hope the other folks in the room are making progress on that front as well. Appreciate the commentary, especially the interplay between raw materials and pricing. You're going to have it fully offset by the end of the fiscal first quarter of 2022. I'm just curious if you could offer kind of qualitative comments or quantitative comments in terms of what % raw material inflation you think you're facing here in the fiscal fourth quarter and in the fiscal first quarter. How significant are these headwinds? I think a couple things are happening. Number one, we were seeing inflationary increases at the end of calendar 2020 and the beginning of calendar 2021, that were structural. Those were impacted as, I think everyone on this call knows, by the Winter Storm and its impact.
We are seeing temporarily, certain raw materials like epoxies that are more than double in cost what they were a year ago. That's true across a number of categories. That aside, we think that you're going to see inflation in our markets that's going to be high single digits. I think an important thing for people to understand is that inflationary impact on us and in our market and our industry exists throughout the P&L. It's not just raw material cost, it's transportation cost of all types, rail, over the road, truck, ocean freight, not a big issue for us, but ocean freight, and it's also labor costs. You're seeing higher labor costs in factories and distribution centers, and to a certain extent, across the organization. Labor costs are particularly interesting over the last year. To a certain extent, we're competing with the government
In some of our distribution centers, we would have seasonal part-time workers who decided that if they could get paid more by staying at home, they would. We've had to replace many of those with full-time workforce that has a higher benefit expense. Inflation in total is going to be mid to high single digits throughout the year. That's structural. That does not include some of the extraordinary spikes that resulted from the storm, and they're throughout the P&L.
That's very helpful. You're replacing that throughout the year, but by the time you come within six months or less than six months, actually, your price increases will have fully offset that. That's how we think about it, correct?
That's correct. We will see some gross margin deterioration in our fourth quarter, particularly in our consumer business. We'll see gross margin deterioration in Q1. Again, in the consumer business, particularly, which will be a combination of two things. One, cost price mix, and two, the fact that in consumer in Q1 we'll be rounding a first quarter performance last year where organic growth was up 34%, and we do not expect to exceed that. Those are the big challenges that we see, and I think you'll see a return to gross margin improvement after Q1. With the strong sales leverage and the continued benefits of MAP to Growth, we should see EBIT margin improvement modestly in Q4 at the operating level, as Rusty said, and then continuing in fiscal 2021.
Very helpful.
fiscal 2022.
2022. Yep, got you. That's very helpful. Thanks so much.
Thank you, Frank.
Your next question will come from Rosemarie Morbelli from GU Research. Your line is open.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. I got my second shot as well.
Congratulations
ring the bell. Frank, can you talk about the trends you are seeing at the big box and other retailer outlets as far as your consumer business is concerned? You mentioned the anticipated benefits from the increasing vaccinations for performance products, but people, on the other hand, are going back to work, so they will be less do it yourself. Is professional painters and others enough to affect a potential decline on the DIY in 2022?
In general, we're seeing a still solid consumer takeaway across all of our Consumer Group customer base. It's certainly down from what it was in the summer and the fall. In the summer and the fall, we were looking at 30% organic growth rates. Consumer takeaway in the third quarter was more in a low single-digit range, low teens. We expect to start rounding much more difficult comparisons in April and May and the first and second quarter of fiscal 2022. I would expect, as we indicated a minute ago, that we'll see some gross margin challenges and, quite candidly, some very difficult comparisons in our Consumer segment. Our results will be above what at the time were records in fiscal 2019.
In the first half of next year, really starting in April and May, I would expect us to be flat to slightly down relative to the comparisons that we'll be facing. The flip side is as we sit here, we are starting to see positive sales and earning contribution from our Performance Coatings Group, really the first positive results in the top and bottom line from those more industrial-focused businesses and industries that we've seen in more than a year. As you can see in our results, the Specialty Products Group is roaring, and the Construction Products Group is roaring, and the dynamics of their underlying markets suggest that that will continue for some time in both segments.
Frank, you talked about going back to RPM historical revenue growth. You have had a lot of acquisitions during that particular timeframe. Can you remind us what the organic growth was historically?
Historically, Rosemarie, this goes back to the beginning of our MAP to Growth program, we had a 15 or 20 year compounded annual growth rate of about 6%. I'd say about half of that was from acquisitions. When you look at where we were after our last restructuring in the 1999, 2000 range, from 2003 for about a decade, our organic growth averaged about 5% or 6%. Very impressive numbers. We think we're going to get back to that. In fact, we are back to that as we speak. I will tell you, our fourth quarter, our current view is we expect revenue growth somewhere in the 15%-20% range.
I think we're well poised for good growth in fiscal 2022, and the underlying fiscal dynamics will support perhaps even stronger growth, although I think it remains to be seen what actually comes out of Washington in terms of a big infrastructure bill. Also when and how quickly Europe recovers. We're continuing to see some modest challenges in Europe with these COVID-19 lockdowns across some of the major countries that we operate in, while the U.S. seems to be picking up, and that pickup is gaining momentum.
If I may, just following up on one of your comments, that Q4 revenue growth of 15%-20%, how much is from effects and acquisition? How much organic do you anticipate?
I don't have that specific number. I would tell you in general, less than a quarter of it is from price, and the balance will be mostly from organic growth. I would guess, we look in this quarter in acquisition activity.
2%.
Yeah, 2%. You would expect another 2% of impact from acquisitions, I think in Q4. The balance will be organic growth.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
Your next question will come from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Your line is open.
Morning, Ghansham.
Good morning, Frank. Good morning, everybody. Thanks for fitting me in. Frank, can you personally, in your comments, you talked about just given the journey you've been on and MAP to Growth, being better equipped to handle the current raw material environment. Can you just give us some more detail in terms of what exactly that means? How has your pricing strategy just broadly changed since the last inflation cycle, which was three years ago?
Sure. I'll hit you. You're gonna steal my concluding comments, Ghansham, with that question, which is a good one. Our MAP to Growth program has fundamentally changed RPM. It's not just about saving or achieving the $290 million in savings. In fact, at May 31, 2021, we'll be at a roughly a $300 million run rate, and we expect $50 million of MAP savings to benefit incrementally fiscal 2022. It really has, and in a relatively short period of time, begun to ingrain continuous improvements of lean manufacturing disciplines into our manufacturing and operations and really into our DNA there. The work that our teams have done in procurement has been extraordinary. We went from a loose collaboration to a centralized procurement activity.
Mike Sullivan, who took over as Chief Restructuring Officer from Steve Knoop and Tim Kinser and Gordy Hyde and their teams have done extraordinary work. The other thing that has fundamentally transformed RPM is the work of Rusty Gordon, Scott Copeland, Lonny Caruso, who's our IT Director, and his teams. We have developed systems for tracking savings and efficiency programs out of the MAP to Growth initiative. That is something we call MPST. We have adopted that. We started a year ago. We got disrupted by COVID, but have adopted an internal ad corporate system to map growth initiatives called the MPGT. We have a consolidated effort to look much more aggressively and much more proactively at cost price mix.
What we've been able to do in terms of utilizing information across RPM on a centralized basis to communicate better, share best practices, and really have more real-time data in which to make decisions is dramatically different from what RPM was three years ago. We expect to continue to build on that. The last comment I'll make is that the procurement effort has really established us as a good partner to some of our major raw material suppliers in ways that we were not before. We have substantially more and different raw materials under global contracts than we did three years ago, and that has been very fortuitous in how that has helped us in this challenging raw material cost increase environment. At least as we speak now, also a raw material availability environment.
It's pretty exciting, because there'll be more to come around the kind of the cultural change that we've affected in MAP to Growth, which is, I think in the long run, probably more important than the execution of achieving a particular efficiency number. That concludes my prepared remarks.
Also for my second question, going back to 3Q, and your original guidance before you had that release on Feb 18th. Construction came in well above I think what you'd originally seen. I know it's a small quarter, but can you just give us a sense as to where exactly the upside came from and what drove that specific to 3Q?
I have commented before on this. Paul Hoogenboom, who leads our Construction Products Group, and his team are doing extraordinary work. It's a combination of two things that came together at the right time. One is an effort to bring together, and this started before MAP to Growth, our collection of Construction Products Group businesses, Dryvit, Nudura, different parts of Tremco, some of which operated relatively independently in our Euclid Chemical business, into a much more integrated kind of holistic approach to the market. While we call it the RPM Construction Products Group, they're going to market globally as the Tremco Construction Products Group. That integration onto common IP platforms, we are getting some common specification efforts, is really paying big dividends.
You overlay that with the benefits of MAP to Growth, you're seeing a really good combination of market beating top line performance and the leverage to the bottom line. That's continuing. You'll see it continue in the fourth quarter, and boy, I would expect it to continue for the next couple of years. We have some more work to do, but the enthusiasm amongst our people in the Tremco Construction Products Group and the extraordinary work they're doing is just fantastic, and you can see it in the marketplace. The last comment I'll make as I ramble on here is there's been a decided shift there towards more renovation as opposed to new construction. New construction is still probably 30% of the Construction Products Group, if not more, but we've become more renovation-focused, which has really served us well.
Infrastructure spending, a big boom in construction activity will only serve to help accelerate the performance that we're seeing.
Okay, perfect. Thanks, Frank, and congrats again on the vaccine.
Thanks, Ghansham.
Your next question will come from Steve Byrne from Bank of America. Your line is open.
Morning, Steve.
Morning, Frank. You made a comment about as MAP to Growth is winding down, you're gonna start shifting your investment internally. I'm curious to hear your outlook for the key revenue growth drivers over these next couple of years. How would you rank these buckets, the potential share gains from cross-selling and integrating the commercial more outside of the U.S., and the third one being M&A?
Sure. A great question in terms of where we're going and how we're thinking about growth. First of all, in our investor presentation, we outlined kind of what we think is the addressable markets globally for our four segments. It comes up to about $134 billion. Half of that relates to our Construction Products Group. Given the comments I just made and the opportunities we see there, I would expect that to be probably our fastest growing group, particularly in light of the extraordinary year in which Consumer has had. We are also in the early stages of cross-selling, if you will, between our Construction Products Group and our Consumer Group, particularly where there's an interest with some of our big box customers in some of the Construction Products Group's waterproofing, roofing, coatings, and sealant products, as well as concrete patch and repair products.
There's opportunities there. We have as part of MAP to Growth, this was not part of the original plan, but we had added to it, brought in McKinsey to really help kickstart growth in our Specialty Products Group. We had under-invested in our Specialty Products Group for a long time, in part because most of those businesses were part of the SPAC, asbestos bankruptcy solution challenge, and were being managed for cash. I think you're seeing the early results of both our focus on growth in those businesses in the Specialty Products Group and some leadership changes that were affected by Ronnie Holman, who's the leader of that group. There's some exciting opportunities there that we'll be in a position to talk about more in July and in October as they come to fruition and we get comfortable about what we want to disclose publicly.
Lastly, we're better able to integrate bolt-on acquisitions than we ever have. Having said that, all of our bolt-on acquisition activity is really done with a focus on growth. How can we take a unique product line or a unique technology and double or triple its sales in a short period of time by leveraging it over our distribution or our sales forces? The combination's pretty exciting for us, and there's a pretty good M&A pipeline, albeit at pretty good historic valuation levels in terms of highs relative to interest rates and stock market value.
Maybe just to drill in on one of those, Frank. The intermediary on your construction products are those contractors that do the renovation work, and you obviously have good relationships with them. How do you develop those in new regions and grow ex-U.S.? Do you need acquisitions to give you kind of a footprint in a new region that you can then grow relationships?
Sure. I think the best example in the near term that should start to pay off is in Europe. If we had a disparate collection of construction chemical businesses in the U.S., when you look at Europe between Flowcrete and Dryvit, which is headquartered in Poland, our illbruck business and our Tremco business, they all operated independently. Under the leadership of Melissa Schaller, who's doing a great job over there, has been with us for quite a while, and leads the Tremco Construction Products Group efforts in Europe. We have integrated those businesses. We're going to market more as Tremco Construction Products Group, and it's been a real fixer-up job. I think we're getting towards the end stages of the fixer-up part in terms of plant consolidation, really getting people to see themselves as part of one Construction Products Group team.
They'll quickly be able to shift to a focus on growth. Hopefully, we'll be lucky on the timing because Europe is certainly behind the U.S. relative to opening up and activity principally related to these recurring national shutdowns in some of our major markets like Germany and France and Italy. We're actually doing pretty well in the U.K. Outside of that, we've got really exciting growth in places like Europe and Asia, but it's on very small bases, and so acquisitions will certainly help us accelerate growth and establish a bigger presence in international markets.
Thank you.
Your next question will come from Jeff Zekauskas from JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Hi.
Morning, Zekauskas. Oh, good morning, Jeff.
Yep. Hi. By my calculation, to offset your raw material inflation, you'd need about a 3% increase. 3% is normally tough to get in the middle of a calendar year in that things really readjust themselves at the beginning of the year. Is 3% roughly the right number? Is the reason that you're confident that you can achieve that is that customers really need product, and so they're willing to be more flexible in pricing terms?
I think that just to reflect the comments we made earlier, we anticipate structural changes in inflation in our markets throughout our P&L that's going to be high single digits. We have gone out with price increases that are in the 6%-8% range. Some of our businesses went out early in anticipation. These are industrial businesses, and looking at the changes at the end of the calendar year, and the beginning of this new calendar year with 3%-5% price increases. As we sit here today, those aren't enough, and they're going out again. In certain categories, I mentioned epoxies, we've increased prices on certain of our product lines by 14%. That's in light of epoxy prices, which we think are temporary, which have more than doubled.
They'll certainly come down from their current highs, but they will be substantially higher than they were a year ago. That, from our perspective, is a structural change in most all of our raw materials, from acrylic resins to epoxy resins to all types of polymers and polyols. It's just been an extraordinary period of time in terms of spikes, but really in terms of inflation. Corrugated, packaging, transportation costs all going up. We'll have maybe better information in July in terms of where we are. The last comment I'll make to your question is, we've been, I think, both good and fortunate in our ability not to have to short and/or not be able to supply. We have continued work to do on working capital. We've been a heavy working capital company.
We've generated in excess of $200 million of positive cash flow from improvements in working capital. Whether it was raw material or inventory, whether it was new contracts, so far, we've been able to manage through these circumstances, I think, pretty well.
Okay. For my follow-up, do you think volumes in consumer products are going to grow in fiscal 2022, or do you think they're going to shrink or be flat, or roughly how do you see it?
Sure. As I commented earlier on the call, starting in April and May, certainly through the first and second quarter, we anticipate consumer volume flat or slightly down. That's in light of, for instance, a first quarter of fiscal 2020 organic growth of 34%, which is a mountain we don't expect to beat in the first quarter of this year. We do have some market share gains. We do have some new product introductions to the extent that there is acquisition activity that could end up resulting in a year-over-year higher performance. On an organic basis, starting in April, I think we anticipate flat to slightly down results in our Consumer segment on the top line and the bottom line.
That seems a little more pessimistic than you were three months ago. Is that true?
No, it's not true. I think, three months ago, first of all, we didn't talk too much about fiscal 2022. I can tell you, we have made numerous references to the fact that we were not going to top a 34% organic growth in the first quarter. I believe that six months ago, and I believed it three months ago, and I believe it today. I wouldn't say we're pessimistic. We will be meaningfully above the record results of where we were in our Consumer Group in fiscal 2019. There has been an expansion, broadly of the market of more confident DIYers and we're excited about that. Circumstantially, starting in April and certainly through our first quarter, we'd expect to be flat or slightly down in our Consumer Group versus these extraordinary comparisons to last year.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from John McNulty from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Yeah, good morning.
Good morning.
Good morning, Frank, and thanks for taking my question. A question first on Nudura. It sounds like that business is kind of really turning the corner and some of it may have been on high lumber prices. I guess from your perspective is it a function of, okay, you're cheaper now or more cost competitive against lumber, but if and when lumber eventually comes back down to earth, you give some of that back? Or is it more, hey, look, you've gotten a lot of contractors a lot more comfortable with it, and maybe this high lumber price has kind of facilitated that, but because of that, it's resulted in a little bit more of a secular shift, and now with that greater comfort level, you can kind of see the growth continue to emerge from that. How should we be thinking about that?
Very much the latter, John. I think it was growing double digits before the lumber price issue. We are working on greater specification. ICF with contractors is initially a challenging sell because, for better or for worse, and sometimes it helps us, contractors, architects, engineers are hesitant to change from systems that work. When we get people that convert to ICF, they love it. It is less labor-intensive, in many instances. It provides the most durable sidewall in the market today, bar none. It is highly energy efficient. We have been focusing efforts through our Tremco Construction Products Group, again, on an integrated basis, utilizing the sales force of 200 plus people in the Tremco waterproofing and sealant business, to really drive sales in Nudura. The lumber price situation was some added gravy to help accelerate that.
We're very excited about that, and we're also excited about the ability to deliver a more integrated wall. Nudura independently was bought and part of Dryvit. Today, they're all part of our Tremco Construction Products Group. Our specifications around Nudura are not just for an ICF wall system. They're for the Tremco sealants and all the joints. They're for Dryvit or NewBrick or other siding that we're involved in. The opportunity there is very exciting. It's mostly residential, and the opportunity to drive it in light commercial institutional markets like schools is huge.
Got it. No, that definitely makes sense. Could you give us a little bit of color in terms of the M&A pipeline? It sounds like you've made a couple opportunistic acquisitions just this past quarter. How should we be thinking about that going forward? It does look like, admittedly, some of the pricing is starting to creep up at this point. I guess, how are you looking at the opportunities and the value of those opportunities as you're looking forward?
Sure. The M&A pipeline is really strong. We commented that we completed two acquisitions just this past month. Bison, which is a great addition to our Fibergrate business, and I think also has some applicability to other parts of RPM. That's a patented floor leveling system that we can use with grading or other systems. Tuff Coat, again, a non-skid marine product that is already getting some interest from other parts of RPM in industrial settings. We're very excited about both of those. You've got management teams that are going to stay and run those, even though we'll be pulling them in to our MS168 manufacturing process and our centralized procurement activities. There's more of that out there in general in our space. There are a lot of bigger transactions out there, and I'll just repeat what I've said in the past.
I don't see us paying 15 or 16 times EBITDA for anything. To the extent that there's large transactions and people are willing to pay those relatively peak multiples in a period of time where there are peak earnings, that will not likely be RPM. If there are some larger transactions that we can get done at what we believe to be a reasonable multiple with a reasonable IRR, we certainly wouldn't preclude looking at them.
Got it. Makes sense. Thanks very much for the color.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Good morning, Vincent.
Thank you, good morning, Frank. Just wanted to ask a couple of things. One, you mentioned COVID restrictions are still holding things back in performance coating. Just wondering if now that Texas is pretty much opened up and Florida's pretty much opened up, those are big geographies. When you look at your results in those states, are you seeing that with those restrictions lifted, that the performance of those underlying businesses is really snapping back, or how is that comparing to what you're seeing in places that are kind of halfway open? Any thoughts there would be helpful.
Sure. I commented earlier on the call that as we sit here today in the spring, we're seeing positive results for the first time in a year on the top line and bottom line of those businesses. I think we'll have better color in July, because the biggest reason is that we're starting to annualize really poor results. We've had, in our Carboline business in particular, given their exposure to oil and gas and heavy industry, 10%-12% sales declines pretty consistently. Stonhard business and our polymer flooring business has been flat to slightly down. Their backlog is bigger than ever. We're very hopeful that you're going to see some nice robust growth there.
We'll have better color for you in July to really look back over three or four months and determine how much of this is a pickup in demand and good, robust organic growth, versus how much of this is, "Hey, we look great because last year was terrible.
Okay. Fair enough. I look forward to that. Just as a follow-up, in Specialty Products, you mentioned that you did benefit from the weather disruption, created some demand for you. Is that continuing, given that Uri was in the middle of the last month of the quarter? Is that continuing into the fiscal fourth quarter? From an order of magnitude perspective, is that something that we really need to be thinking about when we model these quarters for next fiscal year in terms of just having tough comps?
Well, I think it is continuing into the fourth quarter, and I think that's true of our Legend Brands business. We have new leadership in a number of places over the last two years. We've been really looking to drive growth. If you look at our margin profile and how it's improving in specialty products in the last two quarters, I think you'll see comparable improvement in Q4. That's in our DayGlo fluorescent color and colorant business. It's in our MRT business, which is our marine coatings and some of the specialty products there. It's pretty exciting in terms of what the work we're doing there and some of the leadership changes that we've effected is doing for that segment. We'll have much tougher comps next year in Q3 and Q4 in Legend Brands.
I think the Specialty segment is poised for some pretty solid growth in the top and bottom line for the coming year.
Okay, great. Congrats on that second shot.
Yeah, thank you. I encourage everybody to go get theirs.
Your next question will come from Kevin McCarthy from Vertical Research Partners. Your line is open.
Morning, Kevin.
Good morning. How are you? Frank, in Washington, D.C., I imagine there'll be a lot of conversations and perhaps some horses traded before we know what a infrastructure bill could really look like. That said, I'm tempted to ask two things. A, what were your preliminary thoughts on the bill as it was unveiled? And then, B, to the extent we might have a little bit better visibility at this juncture, is there anything you feel that you will be doing differently in terms of capital allocation or operating strategy ahead of such substantial fiscal stimulus?
Sure. Without being too much of a politician, I think we're going to have an infrastructure bill. I'm hopeful it'll be more bipartisan than the most recent COVID bill. I say that because if it's more bipartisan, whether it's larger or smaller, it will be more focused on bridges and highways and airports and port facilities and the things that will drive our business. I do think we'll be a beneficiary of that, and I think whatever benefit comes out of that will be in addition to the growth that we're experiencing at our Construction Products Group now.
Okay. Second, it'd be a bit more of a housekeeping question. As it relates to Winter Storm Uri, you talked about catching up in the final week of February. You also talked about some benefits flowing through into your Legend Brands business. If we roll up all the puts and takes, was Uri a material positive or negative in February, and what do you think the answer to that question would be for March as well?
Sure. Certainly for our Legend Brands business, it was a positive in terms of driving their air handling equipment and dehumidification equipment and stuff that they work with all their major customers in helping homeowners in light commercial recover from storms like this. For our team as a whole, I would call it net neutral. I think we panicked a little bit with literally two days of trucks not coming in and trucks not going out, and at least one of our more significant consumer plants closed and not knowing when all that would change. I think we recovered most of it. I would say in the quarter, it's net neutral as you think about what RPM's comparison might be for next year, with the exception of Legend Brands business.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Next question comes from Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Good morning, Arun.
Good morning, Frank. Thanks for taking my question here. I guess, first off, just on the pricing outlook, could you just elaborate on maybe by business segment, if possible, what you feel the pricing outlook is? I'm just curious, volumes obviously in Consumer are still relatively robust. On the other hand, maybe industrial, i.e. Performance is a little bit weaker. Does that kind of portend for weaker pricing prospects over the next couple of months? How should we think about kind of pricing by segment?
I don't know that we would provide raw materials in specific general. I would anticipate, again, we're not going to recover the spike from Uri. It's crazy. You'll see that in our fourth quarter. Again, with epoxy resins, some acrylic resins, some different solvents, literally doubling price temporarily. In some cases, it's more than doubling in price. We think there's a underlying inflation that's high single digits across our P&L. In some cases, we've had modest price increases. In other cases, like epoxy resins, as I commented earlier, in certain product categories, we've gone out with a 14% price increase, and it's sticking. The other aspect of this I think that's important to understand is you're trying to manage your supply chain.
If you want to get product to meet customer demands and serve your customers, then you're going to have to work with your suppliers on product availability and what their costs are doing and what they're doing with their prices in order to get raw materials to serve our customers. That's certainly part of what's driving some of our price increases as well.
Okay, that's helpful. This is a quick follow-up. When you think about subsequent quarters, ultimately, it sounds like you will be able to get price here, but it may take some time. In the future, I guess maybe beyond the August quarter, would you expect that if raws moderate, that you should see some margin expansion, i.e., hold onto that price in subsequent periods as well?
Sure. I think, as I mentioned, there's $50 million of expected kind of final incremental benefits of our MAP to Growth program in fiscal 2022. Most of that is in the manufacturing and procurement areas. I would hope that after, as I commented earlier, after our first quarter, you'll start to see that gross margin improvement. We're keenly focused on that in terms of our conversion costs as well as that centralized procurement activity that we're talking about. To an earlier question, I'll repeat. We're seeing inflation throughout our P&L. From a political perspective, the U.S. spent $3 trillion on COVID relief and stimulus in calendar 2020. We're going to spend already $2 trillion more in calendar 2021. If there's a big infrastructure bill, that's true.
You start to marry that with the inflation that our industry and manufacturing in general is seeing across packaging and freight costs and metals and everything else. I think the bigger concern we ought to have broadly is are we in for a return of some level of inflation? What does that do to interest rates? I'm not an economist, but we don't see anything that suggests that we're going to go backwards in raw materials structurally. We're certainly going to come down from some of the crazy spikes that we've seen in certain raw materials. Again, I don't anticipate that epoxy resins will be 100% or 150% higher for the rest of the year, but they are as we sit here today. Same is true on some acrylics.
Quite to the contrary of your question, our price increase activity is anticipating some significant reductions of the real crazy spikes that we're experiencing as we sit here today.
Okay, that's helpful. Sorry, one more quick one. Just on the M&A side, I know that you said that the valuations may be a little bit high now, especially for the larger deals. Given the changes in your strategy through MAP and potentially integrating prior acquisitions, do you foresee greater synergy opportunities, I guess, with future acquisitions? Is there any color you could shed on what you expect to derive out of the Bison or other acquisitions that you've completed recently?
Sure. I think that if we looked at bigger deals, for the most part, they would have, and particularly if they're at higher valuations than we've paid in the past, they would have to come with meaningful synergies. Versus 20 years ago, my father would go out and acquire at a reasonable fair price family-owned businesses that would operate independently as part of RPM. The vast majority of our acquisitions today are driven by the strategic growth imperatives of our groups, as opposed to buying totally freestanding businesses that don't have a connection necessarily for in some level of integration within an RPM within one of our four segments.
Great. Thanks.
Your next question will come from Michael Harrison from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open.
Hi, good morning.
Morning, Mike.
I was wondering if just to follow up on some of the acquisition discussion. When you acquired the Ali business, looks like it had annual sales of around $75 million. This quarter, it sounds like around $24, $25 million in what I would think is a seasonally weaker quarter. Can you talk about how you've been able to leverage Ali and the Gator brand relative to your expectations and where we should think about that revenue run rate as we get into the spring and summer heavier season here?
Sure. The Ali family has built a great business with a great brand, a great adjacent product line for our Consumer Group, we're excited to have it. Our first challenge there was kind of into the COVID-19 period with a shutdown of Ali for a few weeks and a lot of catching up and really some supply issues. We have worked very aggressively, both in terms of investment and outsourcing in a few categories to correct that disruption, and we have caught up. Now there's good demand there and it's just a great business. To the extent, particularly in conjunction with the sales and marketing teams at Rust-Oleum, to go into some of our big accounts on a joint basis is something that we're excited about.
We would expect to see that business grow at a high single digit or low double digit growth organically. We're thrilled to have them as part of RPM, but we did have a two or three-month unanticipated supply disruption relative to how COVID impacted that business after we acquired it.
All right. Also in the consumer business, you had noted that Europe and Canada were pretty robust. I believe that the DIY demand trajectory was a little bit different in those international markets than what you saw with the strength in the U.S. in April and May. How should we think about the comps of that international consumer business and maybe the pace of DIY demand over the next couple of quarters there?
Sure. We do a couple hundred million dollars of DIY business in Europe, disproportionately in the U.K. There has been more business activity in the U.K. For instance, this recent shutdown wasn't applied as previously to business activity as earlier U.K. activities were. We've had a surprising to me, but really great execution by our leadership team there of a significant increase in e-commerce business. Literally, paint products and accessories direct to consumers. That's growing. I think it's one of the areas broadly in the DIY markets, to me, again, surprisingly, somewhat in the paint markets. One of the positive outcomes of all this is it's really accelerated consumer and customer interest in buying some of our products via e-commerce and direct ship, our ability to learn how to do that more efficiently.
That was particularly pronounced in Europe and really good execution by our leadership team and their associates there.
All right. Thanks very much.
Your next question will come from Joshua Spector from UBS. Your line is open.
Morning, Josh.
Hey, good morning, Frank. Hi, everyone. Thanks for squeezing me in. Just a quick one on price again. When you talked about how you were going to capture the higher raw materials, you talked about changes in terms as something you could work with. Can you just give us an example of how that would work and how that would close the price raw gap?
Sure. Without getting into specifics, really, the terms are part of price increase adjustments. It's really an account by account situation. It's a function of when the price increase goes effective. It's a function of a customer saying, "Can we change terms here or there?" I don't know that that means a lot for the biggest slug of our receivables because we have a program with MUFG on the payable side that's been favorable for us and favorable for both suppliers, and that's on the purchase side there. That's an area where terms have benefited from us. You can see that in our payables. It's really throughout the supply chain. Any time you're talking price increases, you're talking level of price increases, initiation dates, and as how it might affect terms as part of the negotiation. I wouldn't provide any specifics for obvious reasons.
Okay, thanks. Just quickly, you talked about M&A for cash deployment. How about buybacks? Now that you've initiated buybacks again or started doing them, initially you had targets to do a certain amount over a period of time. I think there's maybe a half a billion left in that target. Do you have any plans for the timeframe you plan to execute that over?
I don't know that we've announced a specific timeframe. We have an open-ended repurchase program that's active again. Like everybody, our reaction in the spring of last year was to run to cash and plan for the worst, and I think our people managed through that pretty well, and our performance actually turned out to be better than we first feared in the March, April, and May period a year ago. With our board's approval, we reinitiated our repurchase program in January, and so quite quickly, with a board meeting at the end of January, we repurchased about $25 million of stock in the quarter. So that was over essentially a two-month period. Certainly subject to various levels of where our stock price is. We intend to continue at different levels, purchasing our stock on a go-forward basis.
We certainly will not purchase the next half a billion dollars of stock as quickly as we effected the first, which I think was about 18 months. I would expect it to take us multiple years.
Okay. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Kevin O'Rourke from North Coast Research. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning, everybody. Thanks for squeezing me in here. On the raw material supply side, you talked a lot about the inflation that you're seeing, curious if the supply issues here have impacted your ability to produce at all. Have you had to take any plant downtime or reduce shifts or anything like that? Just, yeah, curious if it's impacted your production capabilities at all.
The answer is yes. Thankfully not on a sustained or meaningful basis. We've had situations where we would have to stop production and/or wait for raw materials. We have pursued certain raw materials and certain chemicals direct through distribution under contracts. In our industry, the good news is they're starting to roll off, but at the end of February and into early March, we in our industry were met with about 30-plus force majeure triggers by primary raw material suppliers and some of the biggest chemical suppliers in the world. Most of those are starting to roll off, which is a really good sign. We have not had any sustained outages due to raw material disruptions, but we have had some spot outages here and there that have been temporary.
Okay. On the roofing side of the business, I know you've got a nice presence in liquid applied roofing with AlphaGuard, and I believe that it sounds like you're even expanding capacity on this. I know it tends to be a lower cost alternative to fully tearing off and replacing the roof, which I'd have to imagine in this environment is pretty appealing. Curious how that product line in particular is how building owners are adjusting to the environment. Are you seeing a lot more adoption of folks that might have previously done a full tear and replace with roofing membranes using liquid applied instead? Just kind of curious how that's holding up in this environment.
Yeah, absolutely. We're in the process of a $20 million capital expansion in terms of our roof restoration coatings. I think we've been the leader, I say Headway, but we've been the leader in driving roof restoration coatings as a way to extend the life of a typical end of useful life, 30 or 40-year-old roof of all types, EPDM, rubber roofing, and other things. The ability to extend that for anywhere from 10 years in the short end to 20 years on the long end at a fraction of the cost of ripping something off and replacing it. The benefits of not filling up landfills, the benefits to building owners at lower costs and actually a reroofing or a roof restoration process that also is shorter time-wise in duration, are all positives that are now starting to be picked up in the marketplace.
Of course, we have competitors that are chasing that market as well, but that's continuing to grow for us at double digits. We're continuing to invest in expanding our capacity there.
Okay, great. Thank you.
Thank you.
I have no further questions in queue. Return the call back over to Mr. Sullivan for closing remarks.
Yeah, thanks, Michelle. Ghansham grabbed most of my concluding comments, but I did want to just reemphasize that our people have executed our 2020 MAP to Growth operating improvement program extraordinarily well. The real benefits of the MAP to Growth program have been to transition and really transform RPM in a lot of ways that will serve us well into the future. It's a program that will formally end at May 31, 2021, five months longer than we anticipated because of COVID. We are working on what's next and look forward to communicating some of the details of that to our investors in July or perhaps October. I mentioned a lot of people that are driving that success. Two people that have been paramount to the success of that program are Steve Knuck and Paul Hoogenboom.
Steve, as many of you know, passed away a couple of years ago, he was the primary architect of this and was a big, big passionate believer in MAP to Growth and our ability to execute, and we've done it. Paul Hoogenboom was a leader in also developing that program. As you have all heard, driving our performance in our Construction Products Group, and there's a lot of exciting things to come there. With that, I'd like to thank you all for your participation in our investor call today. I want to thank our associates for their tremendous efforts and dedication in what's been the most volatile environment that any of us have ever operated in, and that volatility continues. Thank our investors for their investment in RPM.
We very much look forward to talking about the details of the conclusion of our fourth quarter and our fiscal 2021 full year when we talk to investors and release earnings in July. Also provide you more detail both about our fiscal 2022 outlook and some of the longer-term MAP to Growth 2.0 ideas we have, both on the growth side and efficiency side. Thanks for participating in our call today, and have a great day.
Thank you, everyone. This will conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.