Good afternoon, welcome to ShotSpotter's first quarter 2018 earnings conference call. My name is Claudia, and I will be your coordinator for today's call. Joining us for today's call are ShotSpotter's CEO, Ralph Clark, and CFO, Alan Stewart. Please note that certain information discussed on the call today will include forward-looking statements about future events and ShotSpotter's business strategy and future financial and operating performance. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may cause the actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by those statements. Certain of these risks and assumptions are discussed in ShotSpotter's SEC filings, including its registration statement on Form S-1. These forward-looking statements reflect management's beliefs, estimates, and predictions as of the date of this live broadcast, May 8th, 2018.
ShotSpotter undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call. Finally, I would like to remind everybody that this call will be recorded and made available for replay via a link available in the investor relations section of the company's website at ir.shotspotter.com. I would like to turn the call over to ShotSpotter's CEO, Ralph Clark. Sir, please proceed.
Thanks, operator, hello to all of you on the call today. As usual, I'm going to give some color on the quarter, Alan will go through our results before we take your questions. I would like to take a brief moment to wish my amazingly beautiful and patient wife, Rebecca, happy birthday and happy 30th anniversary on this very special day, May 8th. Thank you for supporting me in my passionate pursuit of my purpose. On to business. I'm pleased to report that Q1 2018 represented a very solid financial and operational start to our full-year 2018 objectives. Our financial momentum was reflected in our top-line revenue performance of $6.9 million, up 51% from a year ago. In addition, we also saw our gross margin expand to 52%, up sequentially from 49% last quarter, Q4 2017.
We also experienced a smaller operating loss than we had expected, demonstrating the strong financial leverage our business model provides. Our mission is to help reduce gun violence and improve public safety and responsiveness in communities grappling with these issues. In this quarter, we continued to execute on that mission by expanding our footprint with existing customers and deploying our solution in new cities. Operationally, we went live with four new customers, including Bakersfield, Rockford, Atlanta, and Sacramento County. These new cities, combined with expansions in Denver, Fresno, Chicago, and the city of Sacramento, yielded 47 net new miles for Q1 2018 compared to 29 net new miles in Q1 2017, a year-over-year increase of 62%.
As I explained in last quarter's call, we focus primarily on our annual net new miles number, as quarterly results can sometimes be a bit lumpy due to the various administrative factors that can affect our permitting and install process required to go live. However, I would be remiss not to highlight the Herculean efforts our project managers, local installer teams, and field services organization executed to in lighting up miles in Chicago, Rockford, and Calumet, which technically went live April 2nd in Q2. They accomplished this during one of the most difficult winters in recent memory. They deployed over 1,100 sensors in outdoor temperatures of less than 25 degrees. I want to offer a sincere thank you to them and the extended ShotSpotter team that provided logistical and moral support to them over the quarter.
This was an extremely instructive exercise as it demonstrated that we have the resources, processes, and grit to deploy sensors at scale, even in difficult conditions. Speaking of Chicago, hopefully many of you have followed the positive news and successes Chicago PD has reported in strengthening community ties and thereby preventing and reducing gun violence. We're grateful to be a part of that big story, and we're pleased to get some acknowledgement for the role we have played in those successes. Although it has not gone live yet, Baltimore is another great story in the making. The city was the recipient of a $5 million grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies earmarked for gun violence solutions. That grant helped fund the ShotSpotter system in 10 square miles over East and West Baltimore, where gun crime has been an ongoing problem.
Baltimore will be replicating the Strategic Decision Support Center concept pioneered in Chicago, which combines ShotSpotter data, other big data, along with predictive analytics to address violent crime. The early onboarding and deployment process is going well. Feedback from the frontline police personnel has been very positive, and city administrators are pleased with the community response we have had to date. We believe we can build on this, similarly to our positive experience in Chicago. Once we prove operational effectiveness, we believe we can expand our footprint there and have a greater impact on the city of Baltimore. I'm also pleased to report that we made two key management hires this quarter. We brought on Sam Klepper, who is our new Senior VP of Marketing and Product Management.
He's tasked, along with Paul Ames, our Senior VP of Technology and Products, to develop a product platform strategy and roadmap which extends the impact our solution can have on addressing violent crime. He's also responsible for leveraging our growing customer adoption into a strong sales pipeline for 2019 and beyond as we penetrate our large addressable market. Specifically to help accelerate that expansion overseas, we have added a new VP of International Sales, Jon Magin. Jon's focus will be on Latin America, where we see a very large and compelling need and opportunity for our solutions. He's been on board for less than two months and is already off to a very fast start on surveying and connecting to the ecosystem of partners and potential prospects in the region. Welcome, Sam and Jon.
It's sobering to realize that this is the second consecutive quarter that I'm making reference to a serious large-scale mass shooting in America, but the events in Parkland, Florida underscore the frequency and ubiquity of gun violence. This problem is especially acute in certain parts of cities, but it isn't limited to at-risk areas in large urban cities. Gun crime is everywhere now. In fact, we recently published findings from our own large database that showed that there were more than 4,800 gunshot incidents just near U.S. schools during 2017. That's over 5,000 rounds of ammunition or more, or a dozen shots a day fired criminally near school children. Clearly, we need to find ways to reduce and ultimately eliminate this kind of threat to the safety of Americans, old and young.
ShotSpotter is not the singular solution to this intractable problem, but we do have an important role to play in addressing and mitigating the impact of gun violence. We believe public policy decision-makers and public and private funders such as Bloomberg Philanthropies increasingly recognize this. Our job is to leverage this growing awareness and bring our solutions to more and more cities. That is both our mission and our calling. Okay. That will do it for me. I look forward to your questions. Here's Alan to review our financial results.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss our first quarter 2018 results. As Ralph has shared, we had a very strong quarter to start the year and are pleased to have exceeded our revenue expectations and added a record number of net new miles. Based on our performance, we are increasing our full-year revenue guidance. Let's look at the details of the quarter. Revenues for the first quarter increased 51% to $6.9 million. Our growth was driven by both expanded deployments for current customers and the addition of four new cities. Gross profit for the first quarter was $3.6 million, or 52% of total revenues, up from $1.9 million, or 41%, in the first quarter of 2017. We are particularly pleased with the sequential increase in our gross margin to 52%, up from 49% in fourth quarter.
As mentioned last quarter, the costs associated with our SLA increase are substantially behind us, so we expect gross margins to continue to increase throughout the year. In order to add more color to our performance, we are adding a new non-GAAP metric starting this quarter, adjusted EBITDA. This metric will be our GAAP net income with net interest taxes, depreciation, amortization, and stock-based compensation added back in. For the first quarter of 2018, our adjusted EBITDA is a positive $26,000. We expect that our adjusted EBITDA will remain positive in future quarters. Turning to our expenses. Our operating expenses for the first quarter were $4.8 million, a 57% increase over last year, reflecting increased costs related to revenue growth and operating as a public company.
Sales and marketing expenses for the first quarter were $1.6 million, or 22% of total revenues, versus $1.1 million, or 24% of total revenues for the prior year period. This increase reflects the additional costs related to our continued focus on expanding our sales, marketing, and customer success efforts. Our R&D expenses for the first quarter were $1.2 million, or 18% of total revenues, compared to $1 million, or 23% of total revenues for the prior year period. While our R&D expenses did not increase year-over-year on a percentage basis, we still expect higher R&D spend this year as we invest to reinforce our leadership position and improve our analytics capabilities. G&A expenses for the quarter were $2 million, or 29% of total revenues, which is an increase from $930,000, or 20% of total revenues for the prior year period.
This increase reflects the cost of operating as a public company, including legal, professional, and consulting fees. Our GAAP net loss for the first quarter was $1.2 million, or $0.12 per share based on 10.1 million basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding. This compares to a GAAP net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.93 per share, the prior year based on 1.7 million basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding. We added 47 net new go live miles in the first quarter, up 62% from the 29 miles added in the first quarter of 2017, and ended the quarter with approximately 522 total miles live. This number includes three miles lost from our discontinuation of services to Fall River, Massachusetts. Deferred revenue at the end of the quarter was $18.1 million, down slightly from the previous quarter.
Of this amount, $16.5 million was short term and $1.6 million was long term. As noted in the past, the timing during the quarter when new miles go live can have a significant impact on deferred revenue balance. We believe this metric is better evaluated on a year-over-year basis versus a sequential comparison, especially for this quarter. This quarter, our short and long-term deferred revenue was reduced by $1.2 million as a result of our adoption of the new revenue recognition standard, ASC 606. This reduction in deferred revenue does not affect our new increased revenue guidance for 2018. Cash flow from operations for the quarter was a use of $2.2 million. We ended the quarter in a solid financial position with $14.8 million in cash and no short or long-term debt.
Our use of cash during the quarter was primarily due to a strong increase in accounts receivable, payment of the company's annual bonuses in February, and significant investments in PP&E for deployments underway. As of today, our cash balance is still strong at approximately $15.6 million. Based on our strong first quarter results, our confidence in our predictable business model, and visibility into current and expected deployments, we are increasing and narrowing our full-year revenue outlook. Our prior guidance was $31 million-$33 million. We are raising this to a range of $33 million-$34 million. We continue to expect the same revenue cadence for the year that we discussed last quarter based upon our historic trends. In short, Q1 is usually flat with Q4 due to contract renewal seasonality, although this year we did see growth as reported today.
We historically have seen a step-up in revenues in the second quarter, followed by a third quarter that's typically flat with the second. We typically expect another step-up in revenues for the fourth quarter. In contrast, our operating expenses tend to increase more linearly throughout the year. This year, we expect R&D to show the greatest increase on a percentage basis, while sales and marketing will increase but at a slower rate, and G&A will actually decrease versus the fourth quarter of 2017. We still expect to achieve GAAP profitability by the end of 2018. Back over to you, Ralph.
Great. Thank you very much, Alan. It really is truly an honor to be your partner here at ShotSpotter. I'm extremely grateful for your focus and hard work. I think we're ready to take your questions now. Thank you.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. We will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. Our first question comes from Richard Baldry with ROTH Capital Partners. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Can you talk a little bit I guess I was surprised to see the COGS line slightly down, but still was down sequentially. How should we think about that in the long term as you grow? How do you think that'll move, sort of in step with revenues, with some leverage? Will it be more lumpy as you have to put in capacity at certain moments in time? How do we really plan that ahead?
Great question, Rich. This is Alan. We did see our cost of goods sold decrease on that. We do think that is a start of a trend, actually. Our gross margins should be increasing slightly throughout the year. We did have some SLA costs in Q4 and also some in Q1, we are also seeing a slight reduction in some of our cost of goods sold with some of our telecom costs, which is helping improve our gross margins as well.
You've been starting to add into the sales side and moving into some new geographies. Could you maybe talk about any early, how you feel about receptiveness there? How they react to your referenceable customers from different geographies, sort of any early indications?
Yeah. I'd say, this is Ralph, Rich. I think the mood is very positive. We're engaged in a number of conversations, and the quality of conversations are really quite encouraging. We're spending a lot of time, of course, with our buying center in law enforcement, we're also spending time with elected officials, having participated in a number of conferences, such as United States Conference of Mayors and the National League of Cities. We're feeling really positive about things. I think that under Gary's leadership, we're getting our sea legs on the domestic sales front. As I mentioned in my earlier prepared remarks, we're really quite excited by the early start that Jon has had in Latin America, just being on board for less than two months. The number of conversations that he's having actually in-market have been really quite encouraging.
Although our expectation always was that 2018 was going to be more around market scan activity with looking to get real revenue traction sometime in 2019. We're feeling pretty bullish.
You talked a little bit about how Baltimore is funding their new expansion with a grant. You sort of have a behind-the-scenes view of the broader ecosystem of grants, the amount of monies maybe made available. As you're getting more referenceable again with places like Chicago, you know, without maybe naming specific places, how do you feel about that funding environment maybe compared to prior years as a source of potential pipeline going forward?
Yeah. This is Ralph again. I think we've always maintained that funding is really not an issue for us. Once we have a motivated customer client that wishes to adopt our solution to address violent crime, they always find the money. We're quite, I think, fortunate in that in this environment, we're seeing, I guess, a much more rich mix of funding sources, I would say. We'll continue to depend, obviously, on funding sources from the agencies of the U.S. federal government. We're seeing more states kind of kick into funding a lot more on the private-public partnership basis, à la the Bloomberg Philanthropies funding source that we saw for Baltimore. We're pretty encouraged by that, but that's never really honestly been a very big issue for us. I think it's really more around kind of motivating cities to adopt the solution to address gun violence.
What you've kind of hinted to, I think, is very important for folks to understand, is that as we get more positive examples out there like Chicago, Cincinnati, Louisville, et cetera, that these folks basically become very strong references for us. Word of mouth is everything in this particular marketplace. I think we're seeing an accelerated set of conversations that are happening just because of the positive impact that we're able to make with agencies in our solution.
Thanks. The last one would be, you did turn adjusted EBITDA positive again, and you've been there a few times, and it looks like it's sustainable here forward. In light of that and the fast growth you've already got, maybe could you talk about what your appetite would be to deploy the cash on the balance sheet and as it starts to grow against maybe strategic initiatives? Is it more important to focus on internal growth when you've got an over a 50% growth rate, or do you think there's bandwidth for other strategic moves? Thanks.
This is Alan. I would say that we are going to continue to focus primarily on organic growth. We still have a lot of headroom there, and we feel that spending the money there is the most appropriate place to do it, especially in the sales and marketing side. We are also investing in the R&D and engineering organization to expand our capabilities in the analytics and cognitive side as well. We'll be spending money there. That said, we are and continue to be interested in tuck-in acquisitions that might make sense from a strategic perspective that could add to our portfolio of products that our customers might want.
Thanks. Congrats on a great quarter.
Thank you.
Our next question is from Jeremy Hamblin with Dougherty & Company. Please go ahead.
Hi, guys. Congratulations. I wanted to get into the Chicago rollout and just get a sense for, you're roughly doubling your coverage miles. In terms of the timing of getting that set up and the setup costs associated that potentially have some drag on your gross margins, how is that shaping up here over the next kind of 18 months?
This is Alan. Just to provide a little bit of color here, we ended last year, we publicly disclosed that we had about 47 miles live in Chicago. We did put out a press release just recently that talked about over 100 square miles. Obviously the delta is what has gone live between the end of last year and the press release, which was early May. That's over 50 square miles. We feel pretty bullish about that customer in particular, and we still do continue to deploy in that city. I would say that the actual rate of deployment there was very aggressive. As Ralph mentioned in his prepared remarks, our operational and field services teams did a phenomenal job in very challenging conditions to deploy those miles.
I do think that we're going to continue to expand and try to keep the deployment schedule as high as it has been. Although, that'll be somewhat challenging. Ralph, you have thoughts there?
I just want to add one slight editorial comment that I think it's really the 100 square miles that we talked about in the press release really was more around the booked number, not necessarily go-live number, because we just published 47 net square miles going live, and not all those were Chicago. I don't want anyone to walk away with the impression that the delta between the 40 and 100 was all Chicago going live. Just be clear about that particular point. There's still some miles to go live in Chicago.
Correct.
Thank you.
Some of those miles did go live in April and early May as well.
Correct. Mm-hmm.
Great. That's a very helpful clarification. I also wanted to ask about your stock comp expense, $427,000. How is that allocated among your various line items? Is all that going into G&A? Is a portion of it in your sales and marketing and R&D line items?
This is Alan. Yeah, it is dispersed throughout the different line items in the income statement. The majority of it is in G&A, and a smaller amount would actually be in cost of goods sold, sales and marketing, and R&D. Over half of that is in G&A.
Would that include director's comp as well?
Yes.
Great. That's helpful. I wanted to also follow up on the grant money that obviously is a nice contributor here to Baltimore and a great win. I think the federal budget has about a $25 million line item for this year. In terms of what's happened, the terrible events over the last several months, is there an indication through the discussions that you have in Washington that federal grant money could potentially be expanded even further to combat this gun violence problem?
This is Ralph. I would say, we're spending some time in D.C., I would say that the conversations that are being had are quite constructive, and I guess that's all I would say about that. One never really quite knows what's going to happen from a federal budgeting point of view. Certainly there's a lot of interest, and people are paying attention to the issue of gun violence at large and the role that we're playing, frankly, in combating it. I'll also make the other observation that I think is very helpful, that the current Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, comes from the state of Alabama, where we have a very large deployment, a very successful deployment in Birmingham, Alabama.
We know that a lot of good news coming out of Birmingham, Alabama, is hopefully making its way to the office of the AG, which is helpful for us.
Okay, great. The last question here, just sales and marketing I think was actually controlled much better than we had anticipated. I'm assuming that that's going to ramp a little bit higher as your total sales ramps and you've made a couple of hires this year. Is that a pretty fair assumption? You just got incredible leverage on that line item here on your sales growth, how should we be thinking about that moving forward?
Sure. This is Alan. Your assessment is correct. Q4 did have some, I would say, higher costs in terms of commissions. We also had our largest trade show, which is IACP, that happens in the fourth quarter of every year. For first quarter, on a comparative basis, some of those expenses were not included or did not recur at that rate. I would say, though, that we are continuing to invest in sales and marketing, especially our international operations, which will be included in that line, and the addition of Sam Klepper as the new VP of Marketing. Those numbers and those dollars will increase throughout the year.
Got you. Would you be able to quantify the IACP costs, trade show costs?
The IACP costs were probably about $150,000.
Great. Thanks for taking the questions, guys. Good luck.
Thank you.
Our next question is from Timothy Klasell with Northland Securities. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Good afternoon, gentlemen, and congrats on the good quarter. My question is about the sales cycles. With all the good press out of Chicago and other cities, what are you seeing with your sales cycles? Are they contracting at all with this? I have a quick follow-up on that after that.
Yeah. This is Ralph. We see our sales cycles as being kind of 12 to 18 months. They've come a long way from where they were, say, two to three years ago, and a lot of that has to do, I believe, with the leadership of Gary Bunyard and the excellent team that he's built out underneath him. We're certainly getting more kind of viral help with respect to accelerating the sales process, I don't think this will ever be a solution that gets us sold in less than 12 months. This is a complex sell, there's no getting around that. We just want to set people's expectations correctly there.
Okay, great. Your smart city initiatives, any sort of update there? Since that obviously is a pretty terrific opportunity. I didn't hear anything on the call about that.
Sure. This is Alan. I would say with regards to the GE/AT&T, we continue to explore opportunities with them. We did go live in the first one in Atlanta, early March. We are looking at several other opportunities there. The Verizon, we're still in the middle of the technology integration, which we expect to have completed this year.
Okay, great. All right, great. Thanks, Alan.
Our next question is from James Medvedeff with Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.
Hi, good afternoon. Congratulations on the strong quarter.
Thank you.
I wanted to follow up on a couple of things. The share-based compensation was up pretty sharply quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year. Is that the sort of level we should expect going forward, or is there something special that happened this quarter?
No, nothing that happened special this quarter. I would expect that that's probably going to stay at this level or even slightly increase.
Okay. That's primarily important as we start thinking more about adjusted EBITDA, the add back there, right?
Okay.
Understood.
Sorry?
No, it's understood. That's correct. Yeah.
The other question that I have is on the pipeline. As you just mentioned, a 12 to 18-month sales cycle. Can you give us any insight into First of all, I assume the sales cycle is shorter when you're increasing miles under coverage with existing cities, and that's the first half of the question. The other half of the question is, can you give us any insight into how the pipeline builds or is building or what's sort of entering the front end of the pipeline or the back end of the pipeline in the last month or so?
Yeah. Great questions. This is Ralph. I'll take a crack at answering and then Alan can jump in as appropriate. I think it's first fair to say that we have a lot of visibility into our GAAP revenue for the remainder of the year, which is why we narrowed the range the way we did with our raise prospects. The way to think about that revenue, it basically builds first from deferred revenue, then there's a pipeline, if you will, associated with renewable contracts that come due in the year, that we have a very good track record in getting, given our same store sales metric. We don't see a lot of attrition. Those two numbers are fairly substantial. We have another number that adds to it. These are deals that we have booked, that have not gone live yet technically.
We talked about Baltimore as an example. It's not contributing to revenue yet, although we have booked it, and we are in process of gaining permissions and permitting and deploying sensors and the like. At some point in time, hopefully in Q2, that will go live, then we'll be able to represent, if it went live, say July 1 as example, we would have 50% of that annual revenue recognizable for the remaining of the year. When you add those three elements together, that gets us really close within our guidance range. We don't require a lot of additional sales to be able to get to our new guidance range. It's really about lighting up new miles.
There will have to be some sales though, and that kind of gets to deals that we typically don't talk about because we don't talk about deals until they actually go live. Oftentimes cities will talk about things they're planning to do, and if you did a very basic Google search, you can see there's a few cities out there that we haven't mentioned that are talking about going to ShotSpotter. We haven't contracted with them yet, in most cases. We'll be working obviously on those. That's a part of our pipeline as well. Is that helpful?
Yeah. It's that last piece that I was most interested in terms of the business that we don't know about yet, but you see building. wondering how that-
Yes
how that's going or what you can tell us about it?
It's going very well.
Okay. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Once again, if you have a question, please press star and one on your telephone. Our next question is from Joseph Osha with JMP Securities. Please go ahead.
Hello there. Can you hear me okay?
We can. Thank you. Hey. Yep.
Okay, great. Yeah. I wanted to ask, in terms of your organization as it's currently set up, are you capacity constrained in terms of how quickly you can light up new neighborhoods? I'm trying to get a sense as to how you need to scale the organization in line with the operational requirements that you have.
Yeah. This is Ralph, and Alan can jump in here. We feel like we're in a very good place from a, I'll call it a ops point of view. That's the organization that's led by Joe Hawkins. That includes the project managers, the installers, as well as the field services team. We clearly demonstrated we have the capacity to light up kind of gross 50 sq mi in a quarter in very difficult weather conditions, and that capacity is there to do it again and beyond to the extent that there's business to be able to light up, that we've got the capacity to do that at least 50 sq mi. If we could do it in Q1, we could do it in Q2 and Q3, if business opportunities provided that for us. I don't know, Alan, did you need to add anything else to that?
No, I think that's right. I think, from the rest of the organization, we continue to evaluate areas like our incident review center, our engineering and technology team. We do have staffing plans and intentions this year to add to those, but we think they're appropriate for the growth that we have. We do expect that our revenue increase is going to be greater than our increase in our operating expenses.
Okay. Just to confirm, I believe I have this in my notes from the visit. You're not at all capacity constrained in your operation center, right?
No, not at all.
Okay. Thank you.
Great. Thanks, Joe.
At this time, this concludes our question and answer session. If your question was not taken, you may contact ShotSpotter's investor relations team at SSTI@liolios.com. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Clark for his closing remarks.
Great. Just want to thank everyone for their continued support and guidance for our company. We're all working very hard and obviously very committed to the work that we do with cities to help prevent and reduce gun violence. Thank you very much for dialing in today, and looking forward to talking to you all again in three months.
Thank you for joining us today for ShotSpotter's first quarter 2018 earnings call. You may now disconnect. Thank you.