Good morning. Welcome to the Seagate Technology fiscal fourth quarter and year-end 2017 financial results conference call. My name is Vint, and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Kate Scolnick, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasurer. Please proceed, Kate.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to today's call we are hosting from Dublin, Ireland. Joining me today from Seagate's executive team are Steve Luczo, Chairman and CEO, Dave Morton, Executive Vice President and CFO, and Dave Mosley, President and Chief Operating Officer. We've posted our earnings press release and detailed supplemental information for our June quarter and year-end fiscal 2017 on our investor relations site at seagate.com. During today's call, we will review the highlights for the June quarter and fiscal year 2017 and provide the company's outlook for the September quarter. Then open the call for questions. We are planning for the call today to go approximately half an hour. We will do our best to accommodate your questions following our prepared remarks as time permits. We will refer to GAAP and non-GAAP measures on this call.
Non-GAAP figures are reconciled to GAAP figures on our supplemental information available on the investor section of our website. We have not reconciled our non-GAAP financial measure guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP measures because material items that impact these measures are out of our control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly, a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure guidance to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without unreasonable effort. As a reminder, this conference call contains forward-looking statements about the company's anticipated future operating and financial performance, customer demand, technology and product development advancements, and general market conditions. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current views and assumptions and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. Actual results may vary materially from today's statements.
Information concerning our risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause results to differ from these forward-looking statements are contained in the company's SEC filings and supplemental information posted on the investor section of the company's website. I would now like to turn the call over to Steve Luczo. Please go ahead, Steve.
Thanks, Kate. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. For today's earnings call, I will cover the high-level trends we are seeing in the business. Dave Morton will then discuss certain financial highlights, and I will close the call with our outlook for the September quarter. Before I begin my operational comments, I would like to discuss our announcement today of Seagate's CEO succession plan. Today, Seagate's board of directors voted unanimously in favor of my transition to Executive Chairman of Seagate and appointed Dave Mosley as Chief Executive Officer. Dave and I will assume our new roles effective October 1st, at which time I will shift my focus primarily to strategic growth initiatives and other opportunities designed to enhance shareholder value for the company. Dave has also been appointed to the Seagate's board of directors effective immediately.
Over the last two years, the board and I have been focused on executive management succession. In addition to Dave's appointment, Dave Morton transitioned to CFO 18 months ago, and recently we have appointed Jim Murphy, Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing, Kate Schuelke as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary, and Ravi Naik as our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer. In addition, as part of the restructuring actions taken over the last 12 months to optimize our global manufacturing and development center investments, we have also aligned all of our manufacturing operations under Senior Vice President of Operations, Jeff Nygaard, and we have reorganized our R&D functions to meet the evolving storage marketplace requirements.
The board and I believe we have the right management team and organizational structure in place to execute Seagate's business strategy, capitalize on opportunities in the storage marketplace, and continue to create long-term shareholder value. It's been an honor and a privilege for me to serve as Seagate CEO in 16 of the last 20 years. I am grateful to our amazing employees, customers, suppliers, and shareholders, and I look forward to working closely with the management team on our future opportunities in my new role as Executive Chairman at Seagate. Turning to our operational results, the overall macro environment continues to exhibit stability, and we believe this will continue through the rest of the calendar year and well into 2018. We remain cautiously optimistic that this should translate to moderate IT spending growth.
In the context of the storage marketplace, the major transformative shifts from a client server to mobile cloud high-capacity mass storage deployments continue to represent significant opportunity for Seagate. The long-term trajectory of growth in infrastructure spending for the large cloud service providers and hyperscale companies remains intact as they continue to increase their service offerings and demonstrate significant business momentum. At the same time, the more mature enterprise storage technologies remain a large percentage of the overall IT storage market and can exhibit variance beyond seasonal patterns as the structural shift to a wide variety of IT and cloud service providers accelerates. In addition, the end-to-end storage supply chain is continuing to experience price increases by as much as two to three times in the memory markets.
The effect of this significant price increase is evidenced by some nearline enterprise customer demand softness, which we believe will be resolved over the next several quarters. For the June quarter, Seagate achieved revenues of approximately $2.4 billion, GAAP gross margins of 27.7%, net income of $114 million, and diluted earnings per share of $0.38. On a non-GAAP basis, Seagate achieved gross margins of 28.9%, up 310 basis points year-over-year, net income of $192 million, and diluted earnings per share of $0.65. HDD exabyte shipments for the June quarter were 62 exabytes. Average capacity per drive across the HDD portfolio was approximately 1.8 terabytes per drive, and ASPs per unit were $64. We saw strength in the quarter from our largest nearline U.S.-based CSP customers and relative seasonal demand in the compute and branded markets.
Offsetting this was weakness in our enterprise storage customers, including traditional OEM nearline and mission-critical demand, China CSP nearline demand, and our own cloud storage systems business. In addition, there was weakness in the surveillance and NAS markets due to some intra-quarter channel inventory management. As a result, our overall revenue results were approximately 5% below plan, with approximately half of that shortfall from our cloud storage systems and half from HDD enterprise weakness and channel inventory management. We believe some of these factors, particularly China CSP demand and NAS and surveillance market demand, are temporal and supply chain related, while some of the OEM revenue declines are more structural. Our non-GAAP margin results of 28.9% were approximately 210 basis points below our guidance.
Within this, approximately two-thirds of the impact was due to operational trends issues in our CSSG business, and approximately one-third was due to lower than expected enterprise and surveillance HDD portfolio mix. GAAP operating expenses were $470 million, down 16% year-over-year, and non-GAAP operating expenses were $422 million, down 5% year-over-year. Cash flow from operations for the quarter was $243 million, and free cash flow was $139 million, up 13% year-over-year. While we were disappointed to not meet our top-line targets in the June quarter, Seagate effectively achieved our operating margin and gross margin profitability targets for fiscal year 2017. For the year, diluted earnings per share grew 215% on a GAAP basis and 82% on a non-GAAP basis.
In addition, for fiscal year 2017, we generated $1.9 billion in cash flow from operations and returned 53% of that to shareholders in dividends and share repurchases. In summary, I'm pleased with the operational improvements we made in fiscal year 2017, and we are well positioned for the markets that are being served by our products and systems. I'll now turn the call over to Dave Morton now to go into more details on our operational activities.
Thanks, Steve. For the June quarter, we achieved $2.4 billion in revenue and shipped 62 exabytes of storage with an average capacity per drive of 1.8 TB. For the enterprise market, we shipped 23.5 exabytes with an average capacity per drive of 3.4 TB. Our average capacity per drive for our nearline products has reached over 4.8 TB per drive, up 8% over last year's strong 8 TB sales quarter and up 60% from the June quarter two years ago. We continue to ramp our 10 TB nearline product and shipped approximately 300,000 units in the June quarter. Our sales for this capacity point have almost doubled over the last two quarters, and we expect to ship approximately 1 million 10 TB units in the September quarter.
In addition, our 12 TB product shipped for revenue in the June quarter with excellent customer feedback, and we are confident our qualification process is competitive. We expect to achieve approximately 50% of the exabyte share within the 10 TB and 12 TB markets by the end of the calendar year. The growth in hyperscale and cloud storage deployments continue to represent a significant opportunity for Seagate, and we are confident in our nearline HDD portfolio designed to serve these storage environments. Over the next 12 to 18 months, we expect the nearline market to be diversified in capacity points for different application workloads with use cases from 2 to 4 TB products for certain applications and up to 16 TB for other use cases.
In the client and retail markets, our 1 TB per platter, 2.5-inch platform continues to perform well, and to date, we have shipped over 45 million drives, substantially ahead of the competition. Using similar technology, our 2 TB per platter, 3.5-inch platform began ramping last quarter for desktop markets, providing great value for customers needing 2, 4, and 8 TB client capacity points. Customer feedback indicates we are well ahead of the competition. Operating expenses for the June quarter were $470 on a GAAP basis and $422 million on a non-GAAP basis, down 5% year-over-year. Total consolidated expenses were slightly lower than forecast, primarily due to lower variable compensation. We continue to identify areas for cost improvements, and this morning, we filed a restructuring plan that will provide savings of approximately $90 million annually.
These cost actions provide support of our objective to exit the calendar year with non-GAAP operating expenses of approximately $400 million per quarter. In addition to these actions, we will continue to manage our operating expenses tightly, targeting approximately $375 million per quarter by the end of FY 2018. Capital expenditures were $104 million for the June quarter for maintenance capital and manufacturing footprint redeployment, supporting the continued ramp of new HDD products in our portfolio that utilize new tooling and equipment. Cash flow from operations in the June quarter was $243 million, and free cash flow was $139 million. These results include approximately $50 million in cash payments related to previously announced restructuring charges. Our balance sheet remains healthy, and we ended the June quarter with $2.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents and 292 million ordinary shares outstanding.
Our board has approved our quarterly dividend payment of $0.63 for the June quarter, which will be payable on October 4th. Interest expense for the June quarter was $62 million and will be lower in the September quarter due to the lower debt balance. Our debt structure and level of interest expense continues to be well within our financial capabilities given our staggered maturities and low interest rate. In FY 2017, we successfully completed a debt offering of $1.25 billion of investment-grade financing with weighted average interest rate of less than 5% and paid $316 million to repurchase and redeem outstanding debt, including our 2021's 7% senior notes. Overall, our operational and financial performance in FY 2017 reflect execution of our business model profitability improvement objectives and our ability to generate cash flow from our storage portfolio.
Looking ahead, we will continue to optimize our business model and focus on our go-to-market and product portfolio advancements towards the future growth opportunity markets. I would now like to turn the call back to Steve.
Thanks, Dave. Turning to the market outlook, we do remain cautiously optimistic about the current macroeconomic environment and IT and enterprise spending trends. We believe the end-to-end supply chain issues we identified last quarter will persist at least through the end of the year. Therefore, we want to exercise more caution than seasonally normal for traditional enterprise spending and other markets affected by higher than normal supply chain pricing. At the same time, we are continuing to anticipate a stronger back half of the calendar year for exabyte growth with the CSP ecosystem and seasonal demand for our other major markets, including PCs and the branded market. For the September quarter, we are expecting to achieve revenues of between $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion. Our gross margin expectations for the September quarter are relatively flat and within our 29%-33% targeted range.
Cash flow from operations will be up sequentially. As Dave indicated, non-GAAP operating expenses will trend sequentially down to approximately $415 million in the September quarter. We expect to exit the December quarter at or below $400 million. While we are not on a trajectory to meet our previous guide of non-GAAP EPS of $4.50 for calendar year 2017, we do anticipate revenue and profit growth sequentially for the December quarter. Thank you for joining us on the call today. We'll now open the call up for questions and answers.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, if you have a question, please press the star, then the number 1 key on your touch-tone phone. If your question has been answered and you wish to remove yourself from queue, you can do so by pressing the pound key. If you do have a question, that is star and then one. Our first question is from Steven Fox of Cross Research. The line is open.
Thanks. Good morning. Two questions from me. First of all, on the nearline enterprise business, have you identified any market share shifts that might have hurt either the quarter or your outlook? Secondly, in terms of the non-HDD business, the enterprise systems and flash business, you've done a bunch of acquisitions in there over the last few years. It's had sort of hits and starts, and this quarter is somewhat disappointing. I guess I was wondering if you could just sort of step back and give us your big-picture take on those acquisitions and the progress you expect to make in the coming quarters. Thanks.
Yes, Steve. This is Dave Mosley. Let me try the first one there. They're somewhat interrelated, I think, your two questions. On the nearline side, some customers
You're heavy with and other customers you're not as heavy with, there are some fundamental shifts going on depending upon capacity points. I think at the highest capacity points, there's some things about our ramp that we're not happy with. The product is really good, and we're ramping it hard right now. At the lower capacity points, the 4s and 8s and things like that, quite happy with our products. That's where some of the China CSP behavior and the smaller customers and their issues that they had across their supply chain were affected. There's slight share shifts going on, but really only the highest capacity point is super relevant, and we think that's temporal. Like I said, the two questions that you asked [are interr elated] somewhat. The systems business that we have is, there's a few different kinds of business in there.
There's some specialty products build-out that we do, then there's some things where we were really acting more like an ODM, I'll say. That stuff is not very good business, obviously a lot of ODMs got themselves into situations with the supply chain issues where either they were underwater, they couldn't procure parts at the right point, they had supply that was older supply, so to speak. It was a really tough road for the last two quarters and that, and we're going to have to really take a look at how much of that business we continue to support going forward.
Great. That's very helpful. Appreciate the call.
Thank you. Our next question is from Katy Huberty of Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Yes, thank you. Steve, congrats on retirement. Dave, congrats on the new role. Just a question on gross margins. Appreciate that you've guided flat for September, when you take a more medium-term look out a couple of quarters, is 29% the right normalized gross margin to think about? Are there costs in the September quarter around the 10- and 12-terabyte ramp, around enterprise mix that you think is depressing the gross margin in September, and you would expect a rebound from that level? Thank you.
Katy, let me first say, while I appreciate your congratulations on retirement, much to my children's chagrin, I have not retired. In fact, this was probably the best way for me to stay engaged with the company for a few more years. I did, I suppose, retire from the CEO job. I'm super happy about where I'm headed and what my engagement will be with the company. Also super happy that Mosley's CEO. As I said to someone the other day, that running a disk drive company is a little bit like driving in stop-and-go traffic. Sometimes you're going 15 miles an hour, and sometimes you're going 85 miles an hour. You usually get to your destination on time, and no one's hurt, but it's stressful as shit for the driver and oftentimes for the passengers, too.
I think we have a younger driver with better reaction times now. I think your point is right on where we're headed on margins. The way we see the math, to your point, clearly, ramps are always challenging, whether or not it's a two-and-a-half-inch notebook product or a three-and-a-half-inch surveillance product or a high-end nearline product. Whenever you're ramping the products, the yields come up the ramp, and you get better, and you also do redesigns and bring costs down, and you also start to understand customer needs, which allow you to optimize the firmware, et cetera. We would expect that with the ramp on those products and the overall mix-up that occurs as customers move from 10s to 12s to 14s to 16s, that we have opportunity to move up in that margin range.
I think the good news on the quarter, frankly, is even with the weakness that we had on nearline and mission-critical in certain customer bases, and even within the services group, the margins that they did contribute were not what they should have been. Even with that, the overall margin structure was pretty solid, which I think should give you a good sense of the underlying core HDD businesses is operating pretty nicely right now. Yes, it should improve as we execute here in the second half of the year. Yeah.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question is from C.J. Muse of Evercore. Your line is open.
Yeah, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I guess two questions. First part, in terms of your commentary on enterprise, can you walk through in a little more detail what you're seeing as temporary versus structural? I guess as a follow-up question on the gross margin side, is enterprise still above 40%, or do we see a dip below there, and how should we think about, I guess, that part of your business going forward? Thank you.
Yeah, let me answer that, and then I'll turn the other thing back to Mosley. We've never talked about where our gross margins are by products, and it's a really dangerous game to get in because we're so leveraged in our manufacturing and our R&D systems that to try and actually splice margins by segments, while it may be a fun accounting practice, it's really deceiving from an overall business practice. I will tell you, though, that our client portfolio has definitely greened up in terms of the technologies we're deploying, and again, we have an areal density lead there that's now going on almost two years, so that means fewer heads and disks. To reach the same capacity points, those clearly have better margins than they did historically for us competitively.
I think the real message here is that you have to view it as the manufacturing company as a whole, and we strive to get as much leverage as we can across the components into the products as possible. On the enterprise commentary, there's a structural piece in the sense that our mission-critical lines are continuing to decrease somewhat. Some of that is penetration from flash, some of that's architectural issues that are going on in the enterprise, and we may see some rebound of that with new chipsets that are coming out from Intel, for example. It's kind of interesting because the last few quarters, we saw a strong back half the last calendar year, but the last few quarters have been weaker, and that's counterintuitive with flash prices going up the way they did.
That's the stuff that we're referring to as structural, though. The temporal stuff is very different. If you look at the bill of materials, whether you're a cloud service provider around the world or whether you're an enterprise builder, the bill of materials was dramatically upset because of some component price increases, and trade-offs have to be made inside of that. In some cases, the trade-offs can't be made because your supply chain can't do the build with the right economics. In some cases, you'll make the trade-off by saying, "I'll prioritize this memory architecture right now" or "this amount of DRAM," for example, "right now, and then I'll hold." The good news on that front for us is Well, first, the bad news. The bad news is exabytes have been rather flat all the way through last year, and that doesn't make sense for where the cloud's going.
The good news is from the discussions that we have with our customers worldwide, growth of bits inside of data centers is still on a pretty healthy pace. This will come back. We've seen this a number of different times in our industry, and that's why we call it temporal.
Very helpful. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question is from Sherri Scribner of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.
Hi, thank you. I guess I wanted to ask about the restructuring. Was this something that you already had planned in prior quarters, or was the restructuring a result of something that happened during this quarter that made you feel like you needed to take some additional cost actions?
Hi, Sherri. This is Dave. No, this has been in constant dialogue and under plan as we continued to drive to a glide path of exiting this calendar year under $14 or $400 million. This has long been in process as we go out and continue to drive further synergies amongst the organizations and how we continue to repivot to higher yielding, higher portfolio product set that we bring to market. To your point, this is something that we've definitely had under long consideration and have taken the necessary actions.
Yeah, if you go back a year ago, I think we did at the June call of last year indicate that we were going to take a variety of actions on the manufacturing side to address the capacity issues and where that would have a significant COGS impact, which is obviously reflected. Secondly, that we were going to work OpEx on two different vectors. One was absolute OpEx dollars, and the other was to maintain our margin model that we've committed to and we're staying committed to. That one, as you may remember, wasn't on the steady ramp down because the last six months of last year were quite strong, and we needed to keep a fair amount of people in place to actually meet the upside demand.
There was also some critical product transitioning going on that we felt it made sense to keep the resources in place to make sure those transitions went well, and that benefited us extremely through FY 2017, where we obviously overachieved fairly dramatically relative to where we were a year ago. I think we're back on how do we get to $400. I would probably say, though, as we think about going from $400 to $375, that that is not a reflection so much of something going on in the market as much as a reflection of what happens when you start making adjustments to your OpEx.
You obviously then see other opportunities where you can take some additional actions, and some of it is also related to things that Dave Mosley mentioned about what's the quality of business that we're doing in the systems side and what's the underlying OpEx support for that, and does that math really make sense? A little bit of that, I'd say, in terms of how we're going to get from 400 to 375, but not market related to the sale of disk drives. It's more, I think, related to what we think we can do within the context we've always described as one that's positive.
On the nearline, just quickly, that piece, I think you did a good job of describing where the weakness was, and it sounds like the cloud is still healthy. Can you give us some sense of the mix in nearline in terms of the exabyte shipments? I think I've heard generally 50% goes to cloud and 50% goes to traditional businesses, but it'd be helpful to have some perspective on that. Thanks.
I think it's probably a little lower going to the cloud service provider. By the cloud service providers, you mean the top, the biggest ones of them, right? It's probably a little bit lower than that historically. We did get into this discussion about structural versus temporal and noted some of the weakness among OEM nearline worldwide, and some of that may be structural as well. Sherri, I'd say as people are looking to buy, they may be buying from ODMs or other third parties. They're non-traditional customers, and that model is accelerating. It's not going back to the old way. Some of that's been soft, but some of it may be structural as well.
Thank you.
Okay, I think we have time for one more question because I know we're running into the open here. We want to be respectful of that.
Yes, sir. Our next question is from Stan Kovler of Citi Research. Your line is open.
Yes, thank you very much for taking the question here. I just wanted to better understand where we are from a technical perspective. You talked about some changes in R&D in terms of getting to the next node and the HAMR type of technology. Also, if we could just review what you think about in terms of your policy around keeping folks updated around quarters with respect to mid-quarter updates, pre-announcements, and those types of activities, that'd be great. Thank you.
I'll do the HAMR first. This is a technology, for everyone's benefit, that we've been working on for quite some time in the hard drive industry. It's the next S-curve. The top of the areal density curve that we're on right now, it's getting harder and harder to squeeze that much more out of. We haven't talked about HAMR very much in the last two years, the progress has actually been pretty substantial in the labs, both on the reliability front, which was really the issue, on the demonstration of areal density front as well. Historically, we had talked about 20-terabyte drives in 2020. We still are on path for those kind of demonstrations. We're going to shoot as high as we can. We may even get above that based on what we're seeing in the labs right now.
Productization's looking more and more favorable all the time, and we're going to be driving hard from it from inside of Seagate. What that means is, there's been a lot of discussions about 12 and 14, and then ultimately we'll get to 16 terabytes, but we will get to 20 and 24 terabytes someday. We're seeing those kind of components in the labs right now that with the right amount of coaxing, we'll get them into products and get them out to the markets.
Yeah. On.
Yeah. Stanley, this is Dave Morton. In regards to a definitive process per se on a pre or not a pre, I think the approach that the management team took this go around was, given the fact that there was so much information coming together and lack of visibility of what was really extending out, not only between this quarter, but to the back half of the year's results, we opted to have a further context and full disclosure and earnings call set around the full year versus just the current situation at hand, to be able to provide the full context for our investors and shareholders. That was our thought process that went into it.
Thanks. Very helpful.
Okay. I'd like to thank everyone for taking the time to be on the call today, thanks to our employees and our customers and suppliers and investors. Look forward to talking to you next call. Thanks very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.