Good morning. Welcome to the Ashtead Group results call. I'm joined by Michael Pratt, and together we will cover the Q1 financial and operational performance of the business. Before we get into the slides, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank our U.S., U.K., and Canadian teams for their dedication and engagement, particularly around our leading value and priority, which is the safety of our team members, customers, and members of the public we serve. It's in this spirit I share a recent milestone achieved by two of our team members. Twin brothers and Sunbelt drivers, Charlie and Ed Smith, out of our Tucson, Arizona branch, have each accumulated 1 million miles without a single incident or DOT violation over their 20-year Sunbelt careers.
Given the complexity of this profession and operating such large rigs with hundreds of product types and countless delivery sites, we as a company are very proud and appreciative of Charlie and Ed. If any of you want to get a glimpse of the Tucson twins, they were featured in our recent annual accounts on page 46. Well done, Charlie and Ed. Let's jump right into things with the highlights on slide three. We've enjoyed another strong quarter of revenue and profit growth, delivering a nice start to the new year. This growth is a result of our operational execution, further indication of continued strength in our end markets, and the ongoing structural change very evident within our industry.
Opportunities were presented for all of our capital allocation priorities as we invested in existing location CapEx, greenfield openings, key bolt-on acquisitions, and GBP 125 million in share buybacks, possible through our strong cash generation and balance sheet position, all while remaining comfortably within our stated leverage range. With another quarter behind us and now deep into calendar year 2019, we continue to look to the medium term with confidence. Before I get into some of the more detail and some added color, I'll hand it over to Michael to cover the financial results.
Thanks, Brendan, and good morning. The group's first quarter results are shown on slide five, and as Brendan said, it's been another quarter of strong growth in revenue and profitability. As you're aware, we adopted IFRS 16 on the first of May. I think it's worth reiterating that while its adoption impacts our financial statements, it does not affect the economics of lease transactions, our cash payments, our business plan, or our capital allocation policy. As a result of the adoption of IFRS 16, our measures of profitability and margins are not directly comparable to last year. As you can see, we've set out our performance on both a pre- and post-IFRS 16 basis. I'm only going to comment on and draw comparisons from the pre-IFRS 16 figures, given that it is these that are consistent with the prior year.
The group's rental revenue for the quarter increased 16% on a constant currency basis. The EBITDA margin was strong at 47%, but it does reflect the drag effect from the significant number of locations added last year and the opening of 18 greenfields and the completion of six acquisitions this quarter. With an operating profit margin of 29%, underlying pre-tax profit increased 9% at constant currency to GBP 326 million, while earnings per share increased 12%, reflecting the profit improvement and the impact of the share buyback program. Turning now to the businesses. Slide six shows Sunbelt's first quarter results in the U.S. Rental and related revenue was up 18% as Sunbelt executed well on its organic and bolt-on growth strategy and continued to benefit from strong end markets.
The EBITDA margin was strong at 50%, although reflected the drag effect of the significant number of new locations added in the last year. Operating profit improved by 15% in the quarter to $443 million, at a 32% margin. It is worth highlighting that ROI remains strong at 24%, despite the ongoing significant investment in the business. Turning now to Sunbelt in Canada on slide seven. Rental and related revenue growth of 22% benefited from the full year effect of a number of acquisitions over the last year. This generated EBITDA of CAD 35 million and operating profit of CAD 16 million at margins of 37% and 17%. The Canadian business is performing as we expected, with year-over-year comparisons affected by M&A activity over the last year, including the impact of the lower margin Boise business.
We continue to drive operational improvement from the acquired businesses and our follow-on fleet expenditure and expect margins to improve towards 40% and 20% over time. Turning now to slide eight. A-Plant's rental and related revenue was broadly flat at GBP 109 million. The 5% increase in total revenue reflects a higher level of used equipment sales than a year ago as we de-fleet underutilized and lower returning assets, consistent with the plan we outlined in June. The market in the U.K. remains relatively flat and competitive. These factors have contributed to weaker margins in the quarter, with an EBITDA margin of 32% and an operating profit margin of 12%. Brendan will comment further on our progress on the operational plan for A-Plant.
Slide nine updates our debt and leverage position at 31 July. As expected, net debt increased in the quarter as we continued to invest in fleet and bolt-on acquisitions and continued our buyback program. In addition, the adoption of IFRS 16 added GBP 883 million to debt on the 1st of May, in line with the guidance we provided in June. Leverage at 31 July was 1.8 times on a constant currency basis, excluding the impact of IFRS 16, and 2.1 times including it. Our debt facilities are committed for an average of five years at a weighted average cost of less than 5%. Both our leverage and well-invested fleet will continue to provide a high degree of flexibility and security in support of our 2021 plans. With that, I will hand back to Brendan.
Thanks, Michael. We'll now move on to some of the operational detail. As you can see from the chart on slide 11, Sunbelt US delivered rental revenue growth of 18% in the quarter, led by strong organic growth of 12% and 6% from bolt-ons. The strength of our organic growth, in particular, demonstrates the continued outperformance of our mature and recently opened locations against the market, as well as the ongoing demand environment. I would note that while this is a strong start to the year against our guidance, we do take on more difficult comps further in the year as we lap hurricane activity and acquisitions. Hence, our full-year outlook remains positive but unchanged from June. As we move to slide 12, you'll see the utilization and rate environment remains strong.
The business has delivered strength in both of these metrics with a fleet 20% larger than a year ago. As favorable as these metrics should be viewed as they are, I'll remind you of the drag impact on them, our investment in greenfields, bolt-ons, and specialty product mix have had, which we covered in quite a lot of detail as part of our full-year results presentation. This should not take away from the underlying strength very present in our business and the market. Moving now to slide 13. Consistent with our expansion update in June, we've continued within the framework of our 2021 plan, adding 22 locations in the quarter, spread between specialty and general tool, and once again, being led by our greenfield program and augmented by key strategic bolt-ons. This balance is unique to our own growth strategy.
As you would expect, we have a very clear pipeline of greenfields in place for the remainder of our 2021 campaign. This pipeline is very much supported by customers signaling a desire for Sunbelt's expanded presence, both geographically and in specialty products. The largest bolt-on in the quarter was the addition of King Equipment in Los Angeles, where we invested $160 million. Let's take a closer look at this as we move on to slide 14. The addition of King joins what was, in my view, the premier aerial work platform provider for the Los Angeles market with the power of Sunbelt, accelerating our growth and presence in the second-largest rental market in the U.S. The business brought with it a great team of people and incredible customer relationships.
It is with these key attributes we will add this business to our Los Angeles area collection of locations to better service our existing and new customers to further develop this very key market. A good comparison as an example of what we set out to achieve with an acquisition like King, is to take a look back at our Pride acquisition in 2017. Again, a business with a great reputation. Pride was a clear market leader in aerial work platform to the New York City market. As you'll see on the right side of slide 14, we've grown that business by 45% over just more than two years. This was very profitable growth as we leveraged the cross-selling opportunities. Today, we not only have a larger business in New York City, but a far more diverse business. We expect very much the same in Los Angeles.
Let's move on from a couple of specific markets to the market landscape at large. On slide 15, you'll find a number of relevant U.S. construction statistics and forecasts. Our view of the end markets remains very much unchanged from what we reported in June. The construction market forecasts have not changed, and feedback from our customers continue to indicate broad strength in current activity and in their backlogs. In fact, many have just been awarded or have just begun projects that will go on for two-plus years before completion. It's examples like these that add some clarity and perhaps confidence to the root of the put in place forecast you'll see on the bottom right of the slide. The Dodge forecasts were updated in July, however, remain largely unchanged from their April figures. Here we are, another quarter and more of the same.
In this latest version, you'll again see in 2020 and 2021, they have forecasted a slowing of 1% and 2% respectively, followed by growth years in 2022 and 2023. The key in the context of the construction component of our business is to take a close look at the levels. If these Dodge forecasts are broadly accurate, 2021 will be the forecasted trough, which will be about the same size in absolute terms as 2018, which was one heck of a good year for us. Here we are, three months removed from our full year results and nine months into the 2019 calendar year. As it relates to the construction component of our business, look at where we are. There are forecasts on the horizon showing a slowing in the construction market. However, I will emphasize what I said in June.
Attention is often too much on when the construction markets may take a turn rather than to what extent they may. Let's stay on end markets, but let's clearly shift from construction and take a look at slide 16. As the slide is titled, our business services end markets far beyond construction, and in fact, we do increasingly so. Greater than 50% of our business revolves around everyday operations, maintenance, repair, and events in the geographic markets we serve. These markets are showing no signs of dampening. Indeed, maintenance, events like live entertainment and festivals, and certainly, and I guess perhaps more top of mind, natural disasters like Hurricane Dorian, just to name a few, pay no attention to economic cycles. This large piece of our business is very much in the early phases of structural change in its most basic form.
The products and services related to these end markets and applications are in their early days of rental penetration. This is a very large space that is growing as we, over time, create a reliable alternative to ownership through our larger than ever platform, clustered market model, and specialty business development. Moving on now to our Canadian business on slide 17, where our team are very focused on delivering great service to our growing customer base and already differentiating Sunbelt from the pack as we begin the process of accelerating our specialty offerings, defining a clustered market unlike any other in Canada. I'll remind you, this is still a young business, having grown from its origins in late 2014 as a GBP 15 million business to its current plus GBP 350 million.
As Michael will have covered, as a result, be susceptible to quarterly noise as impacts from growth and investment are not necessarily absorbed as they are, particularly when we compare them to their larger peer just to their south in the U.S. However, the important thing is that Canada is a vibrant and attractive rental market with a very long runway for growth. I'll move on and highlight our A-Plant business on slide 18. As I covered in our full year results, we initiated an exercise to dispose of targeted underutilized and underperforming fleet, which is now well underway and we expect to complete by the end of Q2. This, as expected, has had some effect on the results in the quarter, which we will soon get through. Importantly, however, the A-Plant team are incredibly focused on what is generally outlined on the slide.
With our broad network of general equipment and specialty locations, we will deliver market-leading customer coverage and service while executing on the operational leverage and the subsequent financial results that one should do with such a platform. Given the current market conditions here in the U.K., this will, of course, come over time, not overnight. It's worth noting the business is well on its way to eclipse GBP 100 million in free cash flow, from which we established as a deliverable at the onset of the year. As you will see, we've more than doubled the cash generation in the quarter when we compare it to last year. I want to take this time to make mention that you'll hear our longer-term strategic plan from the A-Plant team as part of the Capital Markets Day we will be hosting in April 2020 while in Washington, D.C.
Turning to capital allocation on slide 20, our priorities remain exactly as they were. We've invested GBP 521 million in existing location fleet and greenfield openings, and a further GBP 196 million in bolt-ons, largely from the King business I've just covered. We've spent GBP 125 million in buybacks for the quarter and are on track to spend a minimum of GBP 500 million for the full year. Moving on to our final slide, I hope the takeaways from our Q1 update is very much more of the same. We've had a strong start to the year. We are operating in end markets that remain strong and have a long runway for continued growth and market share, diversity, and structural change. This growth and the significance of our cash generation capabilities put the board in a position to continue to look to the medium term with confidence.
With that, we'll open the call to questions.
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press 01 on your telephone keypad. If you wish to withdraw a question, you may do so by pressing 02 to cancel. Our first question is from Andy Wilson from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi. Good morning. I'd just like to ask about the bolt-ons. It seems obviously you made good progress in terms of the Q1 and the level you managed to do in U.S., and clearly King is a big component of that. The guidance for the full year is being retained at a sort of 2%-3%. If I just annualize what you've already acquired, it feels like that's a fairly conservative comment. I'm just trying to sort of square that with your comment, Brendan, on just the pipeline continuing to look very good. That feels to me that it's probably a fairly conservative expectation for the full year on bolt-ons. Is that a fair comment?
Yeah, Andy. Look, I can understand why you might think when we reiterate what we said in June that that's on the conservative end of the spectrum on the bolt-on side. We have, in that sense, kind of canceled out the King acquisition we've just done with what would have been the Interstate acquisition, which was about the same size a year ago. Remember, we did have some notable acquisitions as we moved on through the year last year, with Mabey and Temp-Air, most notably. We just simply aren't in a position right now where we think that we will fully make up for what those acquisitions were. Could it be just a bit on the conservative side? I guess it's hard to argue against that, but if we were to do no more for the year, that's exactly where we would stand.
That's great. If I can just follow up with a couple other quick ones. Just on the rate environment, just interested as to sort of any commentary on what you've seen through the quarter and I guess what you're seeing in Q2 already, just in terms of following up, obviously, on some competitors' comments. Just interested to hear your thoughts.
Look, rate environment is strong. You will have heard from our listed peers talking about rates and the strength in the overall market. Of course, you'll see on our slide 12 that we have the right movement in rates. Rest assured the market is strong. I do think we spent a lot of time at the full year, going through the detail, the progress, the great results of our recently opened or added locations. We've added that slide again in the appendix in slide 24, and I think it's important that we continue to keep that in context. Our new locations that we have come on at a slightly lower rate. Not only are we progressing rate, as you can clearly see on slide 12, we're progressing rate now having 207 new locations in the last nine quarters. Again, your headline is correct.
The rate environment is very strong out there.
Maybe I can ask a slightly broader question, but I think the point around the free cash flow at A-Plant, I think is interesting in the sense of how much of that is a useful indicator in terms of if we were to see a slowing in the Sunbelt business of how you would expect the cash flow to develop? Clearly we're seeing quite an interesting sort of countercyclical development in the free cash flow. I'm just interested as whether there anything you'd particularly point out which is different to Sunbelt versus A-Plant, just how the cash might develop in a similar circumstance.
Look, I think we have to be careful to compare it too much. From a cash standpoint, there's no doubt about it. Look, it's as simple as this. If you ease back on the spigot or you tighten the spigot, I should say, a bit when it comes to your investment in fleet, and any other capital priorities you might have, our businesses are underlying incredibly cash generative. All you have to do is look back at the cash generative natures of our business when we went through our last recession. It will just be stronger and demonstrably different this time around. Look, we can, just from a scaling back on the growth CapEx, and the M&A alone, generate loads of cash in the Sunbelt business.
That's clear. Thanks, Brendan.
Thank you.
Our next question is from Arnaud Le Menac'h from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thank you very much. Good morning, gentlemen. My first question is regarding your outlook. I guess you gave some color already about generally positive outlook. Could you please split it up between, let's say, construction and non-construction? I guess in particular, there are kind of early sign of slowdown in U.S. industrial activity. I appreciate that's probably not a huge part of your business. Could we get a feel if there are any sub-segments where maybe the outlook comments are not as strong?
No. Look, we literally over the last week dug into every aspect of our business to look closer. As late as this morning, Michael and I said, "Well, what about oil and gas?" Well, oil and gas is up year-over-year and producing GBP 2 million extra profits than it did last year, notwithstanding the fall in oil prices that have been experienced. There really are areas that we can pick on. Look, I want to be careful, too, what I say. Construction, as we sit here today, has not slowed. All we're saying is that there is a rather logical forecast that the construction component of our business could dampen a bit in 2020 and 2021. I'm glad you asked that. Think about this. Here we are in September, virtually nine months through the calendar 2019 year.
We're getting pretty close to solidifying what the construction year will look like in 2020. Certainly, the first half of what all construction will look like in 2020. The last three months we've seen starts go up. Be careful. Let's not overreact when we see starts go down. If you look closely at slide 15, particularly on that construction starts line graph, we're actually in that forecasted period of that growth there that you'll see in 2019. We're about two or so months away from what is the forecasted peak in starts. Keep in mind, that forecasted level of starts, which will, if the forecasts are correct, begin to slow, will lead to the put in place construction environment of -1 and -2. Let me just make it absolutely clear.
If we have a construction market, if Dodge is correct in their forecast, that is minus one and minus two in 2020 and 2021, we will grow right through that. From a construction standpoint, that's how we see the end market. Time will tell whether or not they're right. If anything now, you could argue it probably could get nudged back. Frankly, I'd almost rather we just go through it so we could demonstrate all the cash generative principles that were asked about there by Andy. As I said, from a non-construction standpoint, there's nothing out there impacting our business as it continues to grow in these areas that have significant long runway and structural change ahead of us. I think that is a very important point for people to get their minds around.
Okay. Thank you. That's very clear. Maybe just a second one, if I may. We've seen some companies in the U.K. with large U.S. exposure, going for a U.K. demerger rather than a U.K. disposal, because I assume these days it could be probably challenging to sell a large U.K. business. Is it something that you could consider for a plan going forward?
Look, obviously, we know exactly who you're referring to, but I appreciate you leaving them unnamed. Look, of course, we follow the activities there. Plain and simply, it has no bearings on our strategy or on our listing. That's all we really have to say about that.
All right. Fair enough. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Our next question is from Steve Woolf from Numis Securities. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Morning, guys. Just a couple from me.
Hi, Steve.
First of all, could you comment on the CapEx you have spent growth-wise, specialty versus general tool? Secondly, just your thoughts on duration over the past quarter. Thirdly, just for my benefit, just to sort of outline what the hurricane benefit was last year, just as we can look at, unfortunately, with Dorian this year.
Well, first of all, from a CapEx standpoint, Steve, we can get back to you on the exact breakdown between specialty and general tool from a growth standpoint. It's going to be biased to specialty, particularly from an overall weighting. Look no further than the greenfields and the bolt-ons we've added, the 207 that we have in the slide deck. If I remember right, 61% of the 207 are specialty. That CapEx is going to kind of fall in line with that. It won't necessarily be 61% of the growth CapEx because it's only about 24%, 25% of our overall business. CapEx does take a bias, if you will, to the specialty business. As far as hurricanes go, look, it's important to understand Dorian. First of all, I think it's worth pointing out that we're happy to report that all of our people are okay.
It looked like this could be a real significant event, particularly in Florida. As you would have all seen on the news, it obviously wasn't the case. Very sad what we've seen happen to the Bahamas. As you can imagine, our teams are kind of on the standby and ready to respond. Frankly, at this stage, it's been more of a people sort of response up until now to help evacuate some of those poor people who are going through what they are in the Bahamas. Look, of course, we responded with our first responders to prepare for a landfall and the subsequent power outage and damage that a storm would do.
In reality, what's happened is Dorian has just kind of skirted all the way up the coast, and it's a coin toss at this point whether it's taken more away from our everyday business versus what we responded to. We had a great team in terms of responding, and we put a lot of gear out there. It was a give and take with that, which we had closed. Mike, do you know offhand the last year's impact?
Well, remember last year, Q1, there was no impact. Q2 was $15 million-$20 million of revenue in Q2. It's really what we're looking forward to. As Brendan said, I think it's too early to tell, but it may well just be a wash or something close to breakeven on the impact, certainly from Dorian.
Yeah. Finally, you had touched on duration mix, which you may have noticed that it was left out. It was left out. It's exactly the same as it was. Mix is having no influence.
Perfect. That's great. I'm glad everyone's safe. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. See you tomorrow.
Our next question is from Will Kirkness from Jefferies. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thanks. Morning. I had a couple, please. The first one was just if you could give any color around the rates of growth you're seeing in specialty versus general tool. I think you talked about it at the full year numbers, so that would be useful. Secondly, just thinking about deals and multiples. If some of your smaller peers are looking at the Dodge forecast and maybe thinking pretty flattish for them in the next couple of years, and now is maybe a good time to sell the business. Are you seeing a more active pipeline? Just wonder whether there are any implications on multiples. Thank you.
Yes, sure. I'll start with the latter. Keep in mind, so much of our pipeline is a very organic ground game, if you will, I like to call it, based strategy. It is a perpetual shoulder-tapping where we're building relationships with business owners that we progress at various stages at various times. I wouldn't say there's any real difference. There was about two years ago. We saw some activity where some businesses said, "Hey, what's the horizon really look like? I've had a good run here, and maybe now is the time." I wouldn't characterize that as to where we are today. There's just a reasonably healthy pipeline like we've had, and as always, we're engaged in conversation. It is affecting multiples zero.
If anything, given the multiple we're trading at, which I think any good management team would think that we should be trading a whole hell of a lot higher. We will use that from time to time. They're trading very consistent with what they were. In terms of our specialty growth rate, that's a good question, and it is very much the same. It's about 2x what our general tool business is growing. Our specialty business is growing at a rate of two times. Of course, that's important when you think about what the makeup of our business is over time. If you take our roughly 55% non-construction business, and if your specialty, which is roughly 90% non-construction, is growing at 2x your general equipment business, then you're going to get pretty quickly to a lot less construction. Yeah, that continues to trade at two times.
Okay. Thanks very much.
Thanks, Will.
Just as a reminder, if you do want to ask a question, please press 01 on your telephone keypad. Our next question is from Ed Stanley from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Morning, both. I've only got one. The others have been asked. In terms of the staff cost, as it's rising as a portion of sales slightly, is there anything else going on there, any inflation that you're seeing in the market that we should be wary about for the rest of the year?
No. There's no anomalies in the whole thing. Keep in mind the staff costs that are rising are very much tied to that slide where we showed 207 new businesses. Obviously, that's the reason why they will be a bit less margin on the outset. It's the reason why there'll be a bit less time utilization on the outset. Remember, when we do these acquisitions, just like in King, we are very specific about the market, very specific about the quality of the business, and we buy these businesses to drive revenue synergies. We don't make our math work because we can drive out cost synergies. For a short period of time, as you're absorbing these, and then you begin to get that cross-selling going, it weighs a bit, but I think it's just more of what you've been seeing.
There's nothing of note to point out, Edward.
Thank you.
Our next question is from Rajesh Kumar from HSBC. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi. Good morning. Rajesh Kumar from HSBC. Just looking at the Dodge forecast. Obviously, the forecast is for the whole of the U.S., and your business is not evenly spread across the U.S. Just from the business mix, specialty versus construction, just from the geographic differences, how different would you expect your performance to be compared to the broader non-resi market forecast? On top of that.
Yeah.
Yeah, sorry, please.
No, please go ahead.
Yeah, the other thing is, going into, say, a 2009 downturn, you were significantly overweight Florida, and you had more non-residential construction in the mix. You did cut rates. What are the differences from that time compared to now that might drive a slightly different performance?
So interesting-
Earlier. Yeah.
Interesting you say that because I was going to answer your question using the example of Florida in 2009. Anyway, look, the question in general, talk about mix of construction and what that forecast. Of course, there are geographies within the U.S. that have a more favorable forecast, and there are those that have a bit less favorable forecast. You'd be surprised that when you look at it's remarkably the same from a movement standpoint. Here's what happens. Let's take King, for instance, or Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, we are incredibly under-penetrated to where we ultimately would like to be in Southern California. Is our business as developed there, as it is elsewhere? Well, no, of course not. If you look at the construction environment there, you'll see strong construction forecasts.
As a matter of fact, some really, really big projects that have just started. I'll reference one, for instance, because one of the guys was talking about it the other day, a big, big win we just had at LAX. That's a $5 billion three-year project. The point is, there's enough construction in L.A. just today for us to sustain really, really good results with the business size that we have. If you look at some of the other markets, and let's just say there is a material slowing in the southeast states, the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida. The big, big difference between our business today and what our business was last time around is that we have significantly diversified.
I mean, spend any time whatsoever in Orlando, Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville, or Atlanta, I would challenge you to be in any sort of an event, whether it be a weekend festival, or it be a volleyball tournament, or it be an F1 race through the streets of Miami, You will see Sunbelt green everywhere. Events which don't have anything to do with these cycles continue to go on, Our business is far, far more event-driven and general MRO-driven than it was before. In terms of rates, look, we've covered this a lot. We've given live detail on this in Capital Markets Day, certainly we will do again in April in Washington, D.C.
We simply have the real-time tools that we put in all of our sales reps and all of our counter customer service representatives' hands that understand who the customer is, the duration of the rental, the type of rental, our time utilization. We fully understand what that customer is looking for, and we do have much, much better controls today that allow us to lever rate in a far more precise manner than an across-the-board manner like we did last time.
Understood. Thank you.
Just as a final reminder, if you do wish to ask a question, that is 01. Our next question is from Nicole Manion from UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi. Thanks. I just wanted to ask about the specialties. Obviously, you see that as attractive. Is the rate there higher because penetration is lower, because competition is less intense, or how else should we think about that?
Yeah. I mean, look, that's certainly the starting point. These are on the niche-ier end of things in terms of products themselves, and it's very early. If we take, I think it's fairly well understood, so we'll talk about it as it relates to flooring. Up until now, really, where we have built out a platform across the U.S., where we are offering customers who traditionally would have just bought, we're offering them a reliable alternative to ownership in the form of rental. It's very early in that maturation. We're kind of 3% rental-penetrated today. It's a matter of CapEx v OpEx. The amount of savings we are bringing to them by way of not requiring them to spend that CapEx and use that OpEx as a top ex-rental, if you will, is precisely why.
Yes, we definitely get higher rates as it relates to what ultimately becomes dollar utilization. I'll remind you, there's a bit lower time utilization in that scenario. In a nutshell, your question had the answer in it.
Okay, great. Farewell. Thanks.
Thank you.
As there are no further questions, I will hand the word back to the speakers for any final comments.
Great. No, thank you so much for your time today. I know we'll be seeing some of you over the next day or so. I'll just remind everyone that we have an incredibly positive outlook, and we're very pleased with the results for the quarter, and we'll see you at the half year. Thank you.