Good morning, and welcome to the Target Hospitality second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference to Mark Schuck, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Target Hospitality's second quarter 2022 earnings call. The press release we issued this morning outlining our second quarter results can be found in the investor section of our website. In addition, a replay of this call will be archived on our website for a limited time. Please note the cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements contained in this press release. The same language applies to statements made on today's conference call. This call will contain time-sensitive information as well as forward-looking statements which are only accurate as of today, August 9th, 2022. Target Hospitality expressly disclaims any obligation to update or amend the information contained in this conference call to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after today's date, except as required by applicable law.
For a complete list of risks and uncertainties that may affect future performance, please refer to Target Hospitality's periodic filings with the SEC. We will discuss non-GAAP financial measures on today's call. Please refer to the tables in our earnings release posted in the investor section of our website to find a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures referenced in today's call and their corresponding GAAP measures. Leading the call today will be Brad Archer, President and Chief Executive Officer, followed by Eric Kalamaras, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After their prepared remarks, we will be joined by Troy Schrenk, Chief Commercial Officer, and open the call for questions. I'll now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Brad Archer.
Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on the call today. Target's record-setting second quarter results illustrate the benefit of Target's strategically located network and superior operating capabilities, which have supported Target's ability to efficiently meet our customers' varying needs. Target has intentionally aligned itself with premier customers, including the United States government, who find increased value in the flexibility and premium service offering Target provides. We continue to experience consistent increases in customer demand across HFS segments, supported by strong demand fundamentals. Target HFS customers continue to benefit from the size and scale of our network, which provides premium hospitality solutions and logistical flexibility for their dynamic labor allocation requirements.
The intrinsic value of Target's network has supported an over 90% customer renewal rate for more than six years and an 18% increase in customer labor allocation from the second quarter of 2021. We anticipate consistent increases in customer activity throughout 2022 and are well-positioned to benefit from this positive momentum across our network HFS segments. target's operating capabilities and network flexibility provided the foundation to expand our critical service offering to U.S. government Expanded Humanitarian Contract, which we announced last month. As a reminder, this contract represents a 60% increase from the initial contract we announced in 2021 and includes significantly enhanced amenities and support services for a population of approximately 6,400 individuals.
These critical humanitarian services are centered around minimum revenue contracts backed by the United States government, which provide enhanced long-term revenue and cash flow visibility. Our intentional focus to expand the critical hospitality service offerings we provide the United States government has materially strengthened Target's financial profile. Government segment represented over 68% of second quarter 2022 revenue and is expected to represent approximately 73% of full year 2022 revenue. This is a clear illustration of our commitment to diversify and expand Target's end markets while simultaneously high-grading counterparty exposure and contract structure. These accomplishments have materially strengthened Target's financial position and established the foundation to continue pursuing strategic growth initiatives. These elements, along with Target's unmatched operating capabilities and distinct core competencies, create the optimal scenario to pursue a balanced portfolio of value-enhancing growth initiatives.
These opportunities span Target's existing end market portfolio, as well as naturally adjacent business and industry applications, which we believe creates the greatest opportunity to accelerate value creation. We are encouraged by the sustained momentum experienced in the first half of 2022 and believe we are well positioned to continue benefiting from our strategic position as North America's leading provider of comprehensive hospitality solutions and value-added services. I'll now turn the call over to Eric to discuss our second quarter financial results and ongoing growth initiatives in more detail.
Thank you, Brad. In the second quarter, we experienced continued strong demand fundamentals and positive momentum in customer activity, predominantly driven by the materially expanded government services contract we announced last month. Second quarter total revenue was $110 million, and Adjusted EBITDA was approximately $56 million.
Government segment produced quarterly revenue of approximately $75 million compared to $45 million in the same period last year. The significant increase was attributed to the Expanded Humanitarian Contract that we announced on July 6, which had an effective date of May 16th, 2022. As a result, the new humanitarian contract contributed approximately six weeks of earnings during the quarter. As a reminder, Government segment, expanded humanitarian contract, center around annual minimum revenue commitments. Additionally, the Expanded Humanitarian Contract includes variable services revenue that will align with monthly changes to community population. HFS segments delivered strong second quarter revenue of $34 million compared to $29 million in the same period last year. This increase was driven by sustained momentum in customer demand for Target's premium service offerings, supported by constructive economic and demand fundamentals.
While Target has significantly grown its revenue and Adjusted EBITDA over the past year, we have remained diligent in appropriately managing cost components across the organization. We take an active approach managing our input costs and benefit from our service offering flexibility, which allows us to adjust primary cost components to mitigate pricing pressure. Recurring corporate expenses for the quarter were approximately $8 million and illustrate our ability to significantly grow the business while incurring minimal incremental corporate costs. As a result of this scalable business model, we anticipate recurring corporate expenses to remain around $8 million-$9 million per quarter through 2022. Total capital expenditures for the quarter were approximately $37 million, with $35 million related to the substantial infrastructure enhancements associated with the Expanded Humanitarian Contract. As a reminder, this expanded contract will result in a transitory increase in 2022 capital spending.
However, this increase will be balance sheet neutral, with continuing leverage improvement occurring by year-end 2022. Further, Target anticipates additional balance sheet strengthening continuing into next year, with the expectation of having zero net debt by year-end 2023. We ended the quarter with $10 million of cash and total available liquidity of $114 million, including $104 million available under the company's $125 million Revolving Credit Facility and a net leverage ratio of 2.3x . We expect leverage to come down materially by year-end 2022. These strong business fundamentals and intentional focus on increasing our critical service offering in support of the United States government's domestic humanitarian missions has materially strengthened Target's financial profile and contract structure.
These elements have resulted in a significant increase in long-term revenue visibility, with approximately 99% of Target's 2022 revenue under contract and approximately 75% of contracted revenue having minimum revenue commitments. Target's enhanced balance sheet will allow the company to continue evaluating a range of capital allocation initiatives focused on maximizing long-term shareholder value. Additionally, this strong financial position creates the optimal platform to continue pursuing our strategic growth aspirations focused on further expanding the company's long-term opportunities. Our established and growing presence within the government services end market creates a natural opportunity to expand our reach across agencies and geographies. These broad-reaching opportunities utilize key elements of Target's existing capabilities, including construction and facilities management, offering long-term growth opportunity pipelines.
These strategic growth initiatives will focus on utilizing Target's existing operating capabilities to pursue a balanced portfolio of value-enhancing opportunities across Target's existing end market portfolio and adjacent end market applications, which we believe provides the greatest opportunity to continue accelerating long-term value creation. With that, I will turn the call back over to Brad for closing comments.
Thanks, Eric. Our record-setting second-quarter results are a direct reflection of our superior operating capabilities and unmatched network flexibility, which supports Target's unique position as North America's largest provider of premium, vertically integrated hospitality services and solutions. These attributes have supported strong demand from our world-class customers, including the United States government, which has significantly strengthened Target's financial profile. This operating platform creates the ideal scenario to continue pursuing value-enhancing growth initiatives focused on expanding Target's long-term growth pipeline. We believe this intentional focus creates the greatest opportunity to continue accelerating value creation for our shareholders. I appreciate everyone joining us on the call today, and thank you again for your interest in Target Hospitality.
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble our roster. First question will come from Scott Schneeberger with Oppenheimer. You may now go ahead.
Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. I'd like to start out by asking just about how the ramp-up is going with the expansion of the West Texas government facility. Do you see that progressing as on pace with the original schedule that you had anticipated? Just any additional color on that?
Yes, Scott, this is Brad. Thanks. Look, no change from the last time we all talked. It's actually progressing very well. We've hit all the milestones, some of the turnover already on some of the buildings as well for the customer. Fully on schedule, and we anticipate that to continue on that way, you know, with a full turnover in sometime in early October.
That's great. Thanks. With that, how should we think about, you know, I don't know if you're gonna quantify exactly, but how should we think about the ramp in utilization levels in that facility? Really, the second part of that question is how should we anticipate a margin progression in the back half of this year as well? Thank you.
Thanks, Scott. Good morning. It's Eric. Yeah, so as we think about it, look, if there's a thing about utilization there, you know, we're not going to be specifically disclosing what that, you know, what that trend looks like. You know, bear in mind that the entirety of the facility is not up and running. There are a couple of phases here, so, you know, we'll see that progressing as we move here over the next month or two. Then specifically, it will depend partially on how the government decides to nominate its variable component, which is a question mark for us.
You know, look, we expect it to continue to improve over the next few months, and then we get to more of a steady state. From there, you know, the government will make its elections as it sees fit. You know, as we think about the margin movement, what I would say is this. Look, there is a ramp as you can imagine, right, in a greater project like this. You know, as we think about moving this forward, you obviously have the numbers that we put out for Q2. Look, those will continue to move in the right direction as we, you know, as we move through time here.
Is there something specific on the margin that you're thinking about, as opposed to just, you know, speaking in generalities?
No, thanks, Eric. Yeah, no. I guess we'll watch as that progresses. I would imagine as occupancy increases, we would see a bit of margin improvement, assuming that the margin rate, the gross margin of the West Texas facility, will be attractive relative to overall corporate rates. That's usually what I'm getting at. And then just kinda circling back. By year-end, that Brad mentioned, probably the expansion should be largely complete or certainly the bed part by October if everything goes as planned, and it sounds like it is. Could we see a potential maximum occupancy from the government by year-end? I know you don't wanna speak because you don't know that yet, but that's kind of the follow-up to this as well. Yeah, kind of a two-parter response. Thanks.
Yeah. I'll let Brad address the trend in terms of how we think about what the government disposition may be. Look, on the margin specifically, a couple of things to bear in mind. You're right? As we continue to get occupancy levels there, that does. You know, that margin will continue to get better. However, there's also, you know, an effective, you know, economic promote, if you will, in terms of how we think about the margin, where there's the minimum revenue piece and then there's the variable piece. Those margins are not created the same, right? As you get additional, you know, kind of additional per head numbers, occupancy in the variable piece, that incremental margin actually steps down slightly from the minimum.
You have to just think about it in terms of a couple different tranches. Either way, in the short run, you'll see margin, you know, get better. As you move out in time and as you get additional occupancy there is a bit of a plateauing effect as it relates to margin. Then once you get to kind of peak, the incremental margin actually steps down slightly, all the while nominal dollars start obviously getting bigger.
And h opefully that helps. We can certainly talk about that more offline to, you know, put a little finer point on that if we need to.
Yeah, maybe on-
Okay.
Yeah. Sorry about that. Maybe on your ramp-up question as well. As you know, we don't control that part of it. What we do control is delivering on time the number of beds in the contract so they can ramp up. I would just say, you know, everybody knows how much money is being spent, what type of facility this is, you know, that we're delivering. They'll have that ability to do that. There's a big need for beds out there. The hope would be that they utilize this quickly and begin to ramp up. It's not in our numbers. We're not telling you that's going to happen. I think there's, you know, as you look at this, that's what you think would happen as the year goes on, right?
Yeah. No, totally got that, Brad. Thanks. Then, Eric, I think you made a good point. Even if, you know, on the occupancy side, even if, yeah, you do have diminishing returns on the improving incremental margin, your absolute dollars are still going up, is, I think the takeaway point there. Thanks. I've asked a bunch, so I'll turn it over. One last kinda high level, I'm guessing there's no update, but just any thoughts on long-term extension of this West Texas government contract? It's a frequent question. Just wanna see if you have any incremental comments. Thanks, guys.
Yeah, really, you know, no update there, Scott, other than what we've all talked about. You know, you look at what's being spent up front on this project, just the overall design of it, purpose-built. We really look at this very similar to what happened at our Dilley project, and it's being built for the long term. We expect that to continue on, even though it's a one-year with a six-month option on this first contract. We look at this, as does our partners, as a long-term solution.
Excellent. Thanks, guys. I'll turn it over.
Our next question will come from Greg Gibas with Northland Securities. You may now go ahead.
Hey, good morning, Brad and Eric. Thanks for taking the questions. Congrats on the results. Just curious if you know what maybe drove the upside to your outlook for Q2 here. Seems like it came in a little bit above your range. Just kinda wondering if anything's maybe changed with respect to your full year expectation.
Thanks, Greg. Good morning. You know, regarding full year, no change there. Look, I think any way you cut it, this has been a transformative project for the company and extremely accretive, no change there. As it relates to the outperformance, look, this is a large project, and it is a substantial project in terms of not just operational scope, but also financial positioning. I think the outperformance you're largely seeing is a function of you know, when you do projects like this, sometimes the margin in the early months can be front run a bit.
That's effectively what we saw in this quarter. You know, bear in mind, that does normalize. You know, we'll continue to note, as we talked about, you know, that progression of occupancy continues to get better on an incremental margin basis. But it's, you know, at some point in time, that does normalize, right? Look, but that's largely driving the outperformance. I think as well is just, look, good solid operational execution is what drove that.
Great. Good to hear. I guess, you know, any commentary you can provide on how the new contract might impact cadence in the back half, maybe if we think about kind of traditional seasonality, if there'd be any change there this year?
Wouldn't expect any modifications in terms of seasonality there. You know, sometimes we see. We do see a little, a couple percent degradation in that fourth quarter on the HFS side, specifically just from holiday turnover, particularly in December timeframe. I wouldn't expect to see that here.
Okay, great. I guess just last one, you know, kind of maybe putting in perspective, you know, how we should view potential upside to guidance for the full year in terms of maybe what you are kind of implying in your expectations on the variable side of the contract. Just, you know, wondering if you can comment on any, you know, maybe what your assumptions are for that.
You know, we have not, as you know, specifically given a variable occupancy, you know, component, or an occupancy component at all. It does make it challenging to address that question. Partially, primarily, it's a function of our partners and the government have to make their nominations on the variable side, right? Until you know that number, you really can't, you know, determine too much more in terms of upside. You know, I would say this. We are absolutely enthusiastic about the project, excited about the opportunity here. You know, I wouldn't make any modifications to what we've put out thus far.
Okay, fair enough. Thanks, guys.
Thanks, Greg.
Thank you.
Our next question will come from Stephen Gengaro with Stifel. You may now go ahead.
Thank you, and good morning, everybody.
Good morning.
Good morning.
Just a couple of things. I think the first was the HFS South piece of the business. It feels like I wanna sort of get your sense for this, but it feels like the revenue growth sort of was lagging rig activity and completion activity in the quarter. I think you guys are sort of more baseload demand, so maybe you don't swing as much as activity does. Can you just sort of give us a sense for what's going on in that part of the business?
A couple things. Look, I wouldn't say there's anything going on that is not reflective of our expectations that, you know, that we've really had for some time. You know, we have talked a while about the market there continuing to get better over time, and that is what has happened. However, you know, I think even last quarter, I had indicated that the pace of progression, you know, has started to slow and moderate or to levels that are feeling much more stable. So I think that's really what you're seeing. You know, if you're looking at the top line, you know, we did have a little bit of improvement there.
We did have some degradation on margin, although that has nothing to do with the activity level. That is more of a function of some lower costs we had last year relative to some higher costs we had this year, just as part of enhancing the business. A little bit of a mismatch in cost there, which impacted the margin. Look, our margins were up in HFS South, specifically 100 basis points quarter-to-quarter sequentially. I would say that is continuing to move in the right direction. The last thing I would say is that labor is a lagging component by you know a quarter or so, you know, typically three to four months.
As the improvement gets better in the market, you know, we will tend to see that increase from the labor side. It is not a you know kind of a prompt corollary of activity.
Okay. No, thanks. It's not a huge piece. I just kinda wanted to triangulate the model a bit. Two things on the government side of the business, and one, just one question that I get pretty often is when you're bidding on this work and you're looking at additional opportunities, maybe along the same lines, maybe in different areas, who are you competing against? Because it doesn't feel like a lot of people have your track record and infrastructure to meet the demands. Right? I'm sort of just trying to get a sense for what's the competitive landscape when you're bidding on the government contracts.
Look, this is Brad. I'm not gonna call out the names, but there's definitely competition out there, right? I would tell you, I mean, your point's right. Not a lot of folks that are set up with the assets that we have, the ability to, you know, to get those installed, construction done in just really a few short months. Also, just the track record we've had for years with Dilley and then we have some great partners. There's definitely competition. They get competed. We're set up very well to continue to, you know, go after even new business. We have a great track record of performing.
Okay. Thanks. Just one final one. The variable component of the new contract, I think it's, like, $185 million a year. Is that linear with the 6,400 beds as far as utilization? I think the other question around that is I would think, and correct me if I'm wrong, but as I look in the next year, the government wouldn't be spending this money if they didn't expect the occupancy rates on that piece to be very high. Can you comment on that?
Sure. Look, as it relates to, I'll take the first part first. As it relates to the linearity, it is not exactly linear, because when I was talking to Scott about the margin movement and the promote in that causes it not to be quite linear. It is. Look, it is proportional in movement. Okay? That is to say it differently, that as you do see additional occupancy there, you will continue to see nominal dollars continue to increase, albeit at a slightly lower rate than you would have seen in kind of prior quarters or during prior volume periods. Hopefully that does help a little bit.
We can certainly try to unpack this a little bit more if we need to. Look, as it relates to your point on spend and volume, it is, it has been our expectation that look, this facility, you know, will be utilized, you know, at a level that a government sees fit and to a level that will obviously give them satisfaction as it relates to the amount of dollars that are being spent as they're part of their humanitarian solution. you know, we'll have to, you know, wait and see exactly what that, you know, looks like over time. Certainly to your point, it's certainly something that the government obviously is intending to use at a, you know, fairly fulsome level. Otherwise, they would have chosen a different decision.
Gotcha. All right, I'll get back in line, but thank you for the color.
Thanks, Stephen.
Again, if you have a question, please press star, then one. Our next question will be a follow-up from Stephen Gengaro from Stifel. You may now go ahead.
Thanks. I should have just asked the question, I guess.
You never know, Stephen. You never know.
I didn't want to be rude, so I figured I'd get back in line. When you guys look out and I guess there's two things, right? One is when you look out at other opportunities, and you referenced this a little bit in the press release, but in general terms, like, I mean, outside of what you're already doing, what are the kinds of end markets that you feel like your capabilities are most applicable to?
Yeah. Look, I think there's several, right? From building maintenance to facilities management, you know, inclusive of catering. A lot of that, I think fits within exactly what we do today. It's a huge market out there that's just it's untapped for us. And that's really more looking at something different. You know, if you look at the organic side for us, it's continuing on with what we're doing, you know, growing some of the HFS side, but more getting into the full government services, not just what we do today, but reaching out further into different government agencies and providing similar product and services of what we offer at this point, too, on our government contract. Continuing to expand that.
I mean, government reaches many different directions, and some of it we just haven't went after. We have a great name to continue to go out there and take advantage of.
I think, Stephen, the other point that I would mention, and Brad heads in this, is if you look at the entirety of the solutions that we provide today, generally those are full turnkey solutions. You know, there is a lot of white space to, in many ways, perhaps disintermediate some of that, right? Meaning maybe don't provide all the solutions, maybe provide a handful of our suite of solutions to a variety of different applications. I think at the end of the day, though, what's the ultimate objective?
It's to take Target from a business that has talked about $500 million of revenue and very substantial margin and pushing that to over time close to $1 billion in revenue, right? With the numerous contracts, whether that's with government or whether that's with other business and industry or combined. That is the strategic objective, and that is very much something that we have focused on, but doing it in a way that it's smart, doing it in a way that we are not putting a number of legs to the stool so that none of them are meaningful at the end of the day, doing them in a way that's been very, very complementary to what we're doing.
Look, we have seen a number of opportunities and frankly, we've passed on a number of opportunities. We're speaking transactionally, of course. The reason is because it hasn't either met the return objective and/or they have not met the operational and commercial scope where there are just clear-eyed synergies that fit very nicely with what we're trying to do today. To be clear, there are opportunities out there, and we are looking and evaluating those, and we'll continue to do so. But to Brad's point, there are a lot of opportunities for us, whether it be full turnkey or in a disintermediated fashion.
Thanks. The other one I wanted to hit on was. You have $330-ish million in long-term debt. If our model's correct and you have a lot of visibility, you're gonna generate probably $200+ million of free cash in 2022, e xcuse me, in 2023 and 2024. What do you do? I mean, do you delever? Do you refinance the debt to cheaper levels now that you have this contract visibility? Do you start an aggressive program of giving capital back to shareholders, either a dividend or share repurchase? How should we think about the benchmarks you look at and the ratios you're comfortable with when you start to maybe give more cash back to shareholders?
Sure. Couple things. Look, you're right. You're right on your perspective amounts of cash generation. As it relates to capital structure, return of capital and just general use of cash, there are like five uses, right? You can pay down debt, you can repurchase stock, you can do a dividend, you can make transactions, et cetera. As we think about the cascade of those, there's an orderly operation of events there for us. Let's walk through a couple of those. The immediate order of operations is, you know, not necessarily to return capital back to shareholders, but to continue to focus on the balance sheet, right?
Our objective is to get leverage down to a point where we have maximum flexibility to continue to diversify the business the way we've talked about just a moment ago. What that means is continuing to harvest cash in the short run, and then you know, then look, initially then looking at the balance sheet in ways that we can optimize that a little bit. I've mentioned before, I've never been comfortable with the cost of capital on the debt side. We certainly have mechanisms in place to look at that. High-yield market's a little bit, it's been a little bit sloppy recently. We will continue to evaluate that. Look, putting ourselves in a spot where we can reduce indebtedness is kind of priority number one.
You know, as we think about priority number two, it will be to continue to have excess capital where we can be additive to a transaction and put ourselves in a spot where we can have maximum accretion from a transaction perspective. Look, failing either priorities one or two, you know, that puts you back in a spot to think about dividends, share purchases, et cetera. Again, there's a logical progression that we need to go through and, of course, we need the full cash accumulation to really even start those exercises. Hopefully, that gives you a kind of an order of cadence as to which we may think through this.
Yeah. The only thing I would add there, all the things Eric mentions is none of them are mutually exclusive, right? With the cash we're going to generate over time, there's multiple things at once that we could go after, to maximize shareholder value.
Is there a priority either at the board level or with the major shareholders of dividends versus buybacks?
I wouldn't say that there is a priority over the other two of those at this point.
Okay, great. That's it, thank you for all the color, gentlemen.
Thank you.
Sure thing, Stephen.
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Brad Archer for any closing remarks.
Thank you. Before we close, I would just like to give a big thank you to all of our dedicated Target Hospitality team members. Without you leading the way every day and taking care of our customers, we would not be able to deliver the record-breaking results we did today. Thank you again for your business or your relentless dedication to each other and for what you do every day. It's very appreciated. With that said, I would like to thank all of you who joined the call today, and we look forward to speaking again in November. Operator, that concludes the call.
Conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.