The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI)
NASDAQ: TOI · Real-Time Price · USD
3.440
+0.110 (3.30%)
At close: Apr 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
3.440
0.00 (0.00%)
After-hours: Apr 28, 2026, 7:03 PM EDT
← View all transcripts

Earnings Call: Q1 2023

May 10, 2023

Operator

Good afternoon. Welcome to The Oncology Institute first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mark Hueppelsheuser, General Counsel at TOI. Thank you. You may begin.

Mark Hueppelsheuser
General Counsel, The Oncology Institute

The press release announcing The Oncology Institute's results for the first quarter of 2023 are available at the investor section of the company's website, theoncologyinstitute.com. A replay of this call will also be available. The press release announcing The Oncology Institute's results for the first quarter of 2023 are available at the investor section of the company's website, theoncologyinstitute.com. A replay of this call will also be available at the company's website after the conclusion of this call. Before we get started, I would like to remind you of the company's safe harbor language. Management may make forward-looking statements, including guidance and underlying assumptions. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For a further discussion of risks related to our business, see our filings with the SEC.

This call will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted EBITDA. Reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures are included in the earnings release furnished to the SEC and available on our website. Joining me on the call today is our CEO, Brad Hively, and our CFO, Mihir Shah. Following our prepared remarks, we'll open the call for your questions. I'll turn the call over to Brad.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Thanks, Mark. Thank you to everyone joining us today. We started off the year strong, continuing our positive momentum from the fourth quarter. It was a record-setting quarter for fee-for-service revenue, dispensary revenue, oral drugs dispensed, and organic growth as we made meaningful progress towards refining optimizing our model in expansion markets, specifically organic growth in Florida. The growth in our dispensary business, in particular, was driven by operational effectiveness in optimizing our existing dispensaries and scale in Florida. As you'll hear from Mihir when he goes through our financial results, we generated top-line growth of 38%. Importantly, our organic growth rate was 25%, and our same-store sales growth was 21%. We are very proud of this growth as it demonstrates extremely strong demand for our model, from both patients and payers. Our value-based lives continue to grow.

As the cornerstone of our model, I'm happy to share that we signed two new value-based contracts since the beginning of the year, one in Southern California and another in our Texas market. The recent contract in Texas is particularly notable as it marks our first value-based contract with a primary care partner in that market. It also marks our first total cost of care contract, where we take accountability for both quality outcomes as well as Part A, B, and D costs. Our business development pipeline remains strong and deep, and I look forward to updating you as the year progresses. On a related note, we are excited to report that we've received data from the first performance period for one of our value-based partners in Florida. The data showed greater than 50% referral capture and greater than 30% cost savings.

This is a significant milestone for TOI and a strong proof point of our model's differentiated approach and meaningful cost savings. Concurrently, we experienced significant downward pressure on our IV drug margins in the first quarter as manufacturers hedged against the upcoming Inflation Reduction Act and as reimbursement and costs realigned with certain generic drugs becoming established in the market. Our team has been swift to respond, identifying opportunities to save, including membership into an oncology-specific GPO, which began in the second quarter. As a result, we expect to generate additional savings on several key infusion drugs in the second quarter and beyond from this membership. I'm proud of our team's ability to adapt and innovate, and I want to thank them for their dedication and effectiveness. As I've mentioned previously, Medi-Cal's 2022 policy is preventing us from dispensing oral drugs to our Medi-Cal members.

We have now entered into an LOI to acquire a retail pharmacy in California, which, once acquired and credentialed, will enable us to dispense oral drugs to those patients once again. As you are all aware, much of the innovation in oncology therapeutics has resulted in new oral therapies. It is important for TOI to have access to dispense both oral and IV medications. Our acquisition of a retail pharmacy will be an important milestone to achieve this objective. Additional highlights from the quarter include oral drugs dispensed increased 34% compared to Quarter one 2022. Total patient visits increased 17% compared to quarter one 2022. The TOI patient was the first worldwide to be treated with a promising alternative to chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer through a partnership with Tempus Laboratories. This is yet another example of TOI bringing cutting-edge treatments into the local community.

Now I'll turn the call over to Mihir to provide additional details on our first quarter financial results.

Mihir Shah
CFO, The Oncology Institute

Thanks, Brad. Starting with the top line. Consolidated revenue for quarter one 2023 was $76 million, an increase of 38.1% compared to quarter one 2022 and a 6.7% increase compared to Q4 2022. Gross profit for quarter one 2023 was $14 million, an increase of 14% compared to quarter one 2022. Net loss for quarter one 2023 was $30 million, a decrease of $49 million compared to quarter one 2022. Preliminarily due to change in fair value of earnout liabilities and increase in operating revenue, offset by goodwill impairment charge. adjusted EBITDA was negative $7.9 million. The adjusted EBITDA calculation does not add back provider start-up costs nor the consulting and legal fees associated with the acquisition cost. Further details on how we define adjusted EBITDA can be found in our 10-K.

Of note, starting 2022 quarter four, we have modified our adjusted EBITDA calculation to now include cash compensation paid to our board of directors. As of quarter end, our cash and cash equivalent balance was $15 million, and we had $99 million in investments for a total of $114 million of cash equivalents and investment. We expect this capital to be sufficient to support operations and enhance our growth through 2024. Now talking about guidance. Our full year 2023 guidance remains unchanged, and we continue to expect to end the year with 1.75 million-2.0 million lives under capitation. Our revenue range is $290 million-$320 million. This represents 15%-27% growth over 2022 revenue.

Our gross profit guidance ranges from $60 million-$70 million, our adjusted EBITDA guidance ranges from -$25 million to -$28 million. I will now turn it back over to Brad for some summary remarks.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Thanks, Mihir. While our first quarter results were pressured by lower than expected IV drug margins, I'm proud of how our team responded to this challenge. Overall, we expect seasonally lower adjusted EBITDA in quarter one with current year initiatives beginning to ramp, payroll taxes resetting, and new drug manufacturer price increases. We do expect adjusted EBITDA margins to trend favorably as the year progresses. As the U.S. market leader in value-based oncology care, we continue to expand our patient base, grow the number of value-based partnerships, and deliver high quality outcomes to cancer patients. As I mentioned in last quarter's call, our top three priorities in 2023 are, first, refining and optimizing our model in expansion markets, including optimizing referral capture and transitioning gain share contracts to population risk agreements. Second, growing our legacy markets by expanding our service offerings in existing clinics and expanding to new counties.

Third, reducing cash burn by improving efficiency with new technology solutions, optimizing drug margins, and taking a more sustainable approach to new market entry. I look forward to updating you on our progress across these three items on future calls. With that, we're now ready to take your questions. Operator.

Operator

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. One moment please while we poll for questions. Thank you. Our first question is from Brian Tanquilut with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Brian Tanquilut
Senior Analyst Healthcare Services and HCIT, and Digital Health Equity Research, Jefferies

Hey, good afternoon, guys.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Hey, Brian.

Brian Tanquilut
Senior Analyst Healthcare Services and HCIT, and Digital Health Equity Research, Jefferies

Hey. I guess, Brad, maybe for my first question, as I think about these total cost of care contracts, maybe if you can share with us, you know, what you're seeing in the market, in terms of appetite or interest level from other folks in similar types of arrangements?

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

I'm glad you asked about it. It's an exciting milestone for the company, because it enables us to manage a larger portion of the total spend related to oncology patients. Expands our TAM or quote-unquote 'shared wallet' with our customers. We think we can do a great job improving outcomes and costs beyond just the drug costs, and physician costs associated with oncology, but also hospitalization costs related to oncology patients. We have seen an increase in interest from our primary care partners in putting us at risk for total cost of care, not just the oncology drugs and oncology physician nursing services.

I think that in part, is because it's just a nice alignment, because we manage holistically our patients. Our partners want to put us at risk for all costs. It's also, I think, representative of some other specialties who, you know, for example, nephrology, where the total cost of care arrangements are more common. The primary care groups are doing total cost of care arrangements with other specialties, and they're saying, "Hey, these are working for other specialties. Let's try it out in oncology." We have seen a lot of interest in that, this year.

Brian Tanquilut
Senior Analyst Healthcare Services and HCIT, and Digital Health Equity Research, Jefferies

Got it. Okay. Brad, on the oncology GPO discussion, is there any way you can quantify the cost savings that you're expecting and maybe the timeframe to realize them and maybe what is in the guidance for that initiative?

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Yeah, sure. We're not ready to release publicly the expected cost savings are. It's, it was not enough to cause us to change our guidance for the year. Given that we just started participation this, you know, last month, we wanna see a few months play out before we put a stake in the ground on quantifying it. Suffice it to say, we don't think it's enough to cause us to change our full year guidance.

Brian Tanquilut
Senior Analyst Healthcare Services and HCIT, and Digital Health Equity Research, Jefferies

Gotcha. Okay. No, that's awesome. Maybe last question for me. As I look at the OneOncology deal and obviously getting closer with ABC here, any thoughts on what that could potentially do to the industry or to your business more, more specifically?

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Yeah, sure. I mean, first off, I think it demonstrates substantial demand for oncologists and oncology practices, and represents an interest by, and, you know, behind the scenes, we're aware of a number of participants who are, you know, we believe were looking at that deal, represents a sort of a broad interest in owning and managing oncology practices, because of how much of the spend we control. Broadly speaking, I think it demonstrates, you know, strong demand for companies like ours. You know, I think, in some ways it does demonstrate that there is still a lot of money to be made in fee-for-service oncology. You know, that's I think demonstrated by, you know, the drug distributors, you know, interest in controlling the oncologists.

You know, we try to focus on value-based oncology, and we're trying to demonstrate that value-based oncology can also be profitable. We're trying to convince our customers to reward us for the savings we create when we both improve outcomes and lower costs.

Brian Tanquilut
Senior Analyst Healthcare Services and HCIT, and Digital Health Equity Research, Jefferies

Gotcha. Okay. Awesome. Thank you, guys.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

You're welcome.

Operator

Thank you . Our next question is from Sandy Draper with Guggenheim Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Speaker 6

Hi, this is Mitchell on for Sandy.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Hey, Mitchell.

Speaker 6

One, one Hey, how's it going?

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Good.

Speaker 6

One question on guidance. You know, we've seen over the past several years that you've grown revenue sequentially throughout the year. Here, if we look at the 1Q print and we annualize it, we get to right around the midpoint of the full year guide. Just trying to understand what's embedded in that guide and, you know, any color there would be helpful.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Yeah, sure. I'll start, and Mihir, jump in anywhere you'd like. You know, we were very pleased with top-line growth this quarter. You know, 25% organic growth is really spectacular. We started the year very strong from a revenue perspective. Mihir, anything you wanna add to that?

Mihir Shah
CFO, The Oncology Institute

No. I think you covered it right. Also reminding the group that our guidance does not include any acquisition for the year. From quarter one to quarter4 , we believe we should be able to... We are comfortable with our guidance where we are.

Speaker 6

Awesome. Thank you. That's helpful. Just, just one more, just kinda on the broader environment. Has anything changed in the acqui-hire environment in terms of multiples and just kind of, you know, broadly, are people more or less willing to sell their practices? Just, you know, any color on the pipeline there would be helpful.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Yeah, sure. I'm always cautious to draw macro insights from a you know, small number of acqui-hires and acquisitions that we are pursuing at any one time. While I'm cautious, I would be happy to do it. You know, we have seen, just as the overall market has contracted a little bit, I think, there is some lag to sellers' expectations realigning with you know, current market multiples. On balance, they have come down a little bit. I think sellers are more realistic and starting to understand that some of the valuation multiples that existed in 2021 don't exist today. Slowly, with a little bit of lag, we have seen those expectations come down.

Speaker 6

Got it. Thanks. That's all I had. Appreciate it.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Great. You're welcome.

Operator

Thank you. I would like to turn the floor back over to Brad Hively for closing comments.

Brad Hively
CEO, The Oncology Institute

Great. Well, thank you all for joining our call today. We look forward to following up with you in the coming weeks. We're very excited about TOI's path ahead, and we look forward to updating you on our progress on our next earnings call. Thank you and have a good day.

Operator

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

Powered by