Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
NASDAQ: TSLA · Real-Time Price · USD
378.06
+5.26 (1.41%)
Apr 30, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT - Market open
← View all transcripts
Earnings Call: Q3 2019
Oct 23, 2019
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to Tesla's Q3 2019 Financial Results and Q and A Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question and answer session. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.
I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Mr. Martin Viecha, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Sherry, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Tesla's Q3 2019 Q and A webcast. I'm joined today by Elon Musk, Zachary Kirchhorn and a number of other executives. Our Q3 results were announced at about 2 p. M.
Pacific Time in the update deck we published at the same link as this webcast. During this call, we will discuss our business outlook and make forward looking statements. These comments are based on our predictions and expectations as of today. Actual events or results could differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those mentioned in our most recent filings with the SEC. During the question and answer portion of today's call, But before we jump into Q and A, Elon has some opening remarks.
Elon?
Thank you. First of all, I'd like to just thank the Tesla team for an incredible job this quarter. The execution was outstanding on just about every front, so it's just an honor to work with such a great team. Q3 was obviously a very strong quarter, but we had record deliveries. We were able to make great strides in controlling our costs.
We shifted back to GAAP profitability while also generating strong free cash flow, and again, this would not be possible without each employee doing their part to reduce cost. Our operating cost is now at the lowest level since Model 3 production started. Regarding Gigafactory Shanghai, this month we started trial production at Giga Shanghai and have built 4 vehicles from body to paint to general assembly. So this is a, I want to emphasize, this is a real factory with a tremendous amount of equipment in it. While a lot of people see the outside shell of the factory, which is enormous and was essentially underwater in January, it was below the water table literally.
What is, I think, much more significant is that we're able to install massive stamping machines, a fully operational paint shop, and a sophisticated general assembly line in the same period of time in parallel with building the building. I'd like to thank our Chinese team for this extraordinary achievement. I'm not aware of any factory of this magnitude in history being constructed in such a short period of time, approximately 10 months. As far as I know, this is unprecedented. And Gigafactory Shanghai will become our template for future growth.
We're planning to build Model Y's in Shanghai as well, of course, and to build a Gigafactory in Europe, and we hope to announce the location of that Gigafactory. In fact, we will announce the location of that Gigafactory before the end of this year. Regarding Model Y, we're also ahead of schedule on Model Y preparations in Fremont, and we've moved the launch timeline from fall 2020 to summer 2020. There may be some room for improvement there, but we're confident about summer 2020. I've actually recently driven the Model Y release candidate and think it's going to be an amazing product and be very well received.
I think it's quite likely to this is just my opinion, but I think it will outsell S, X and III combined. Regarding Version 10 and Smart Summon, last month we released our latest software, Version 10, which includes video streaming, games, karaoke, Spotify, and a host of other new features and improvements. Most importantly, it includes the 1st version, Smart Summon, which has now been used a 1000000 times, so it's now over a 1000000 uses of Smart Summon. In the next week or so, we will be releasing an approved version of Smart Summon, taking into account all the data from those 1,000,000 Smart Summon attempts. So this really illustrates the value of having a massive fleet because it allows us to collect these corner cases and learn from them and use fleet learning and become rapidly better, just as Navigator and Autopilot did on the freeway.
So we expect a number of improvements in SmartSim in the weeks to come, And that's really just the beginning as we collect more data and Autopilot and full self driving functionality get better. I do, while it's going to be tight, it still does appear that we will be at least in limited, in early access release of a future complete full self driving feature this year. It's not for sure, but it appears to be on track for at least an early access release of a fully functional bull cell driving by the end of this year. Lastly, we're highly focused on decisions that really make a material difference to the company, such as opening gigafactories and other continents, it's worth noting that ultimately having 3 gigafactories effectively will triple our output, and then when you consider increased output per gigafactory, it's going to actually more than triple our output over time. And then there are leveraging things happening with respect to advanced batteries and more efficient powertrains and also driving and all that sort of stuff, but that will be something for a future time.
Then one last item is that tomorrow afternoon we'll be releasing version 3 of the Tesla solar roof. That's the integrated solar the solar panels are integrated with the roof. I think this is a great product. Version 1 and 2, we're still sort of figuring things out. Version 3, I think, is finally ready for the big time.
So we're scaling up production of the Version 3 solar tile roof at our Buffalo Gigafactory, and I think this product is going to be incredible. But we'll talk more about that on the official product launch, which will be tomorrow afternoon.
Thank you very much, and I think Zachary has some remarks as well.
Yes, thank you, Elon. Thank you, Martin. Q3 was a great quarter for Tesla. I know many employees are listening right now, and I want to thank you for your passion and your hard work. We've made terrific progress, and yet again, we realized margin improvements in nearly every aspect of the business.
There are 3 key points I'd like to highlight. First, we returned to profitability in Q3, aided by improved gross profit, reduced operating expenses and the absence of negative onetime items that weighed on our financials in the first half of the year. GAAP automotive gross margin improved sequentially to 22.8% and over 20%, excluding regulatory credits. We achieved these improvements through higher production volumes on Sx and Model 3, enabling better fixed cost absorption. We realized improvements in labor hours per vehicle as well as other costs such as warehousing, logistics, delivery and import related items.
We are also making continued progress reducing material costs, including commercial negotiations with suppliers. Model S and X ASPs increased even accounting for revenue deferrals related to free unlimited supercharging. And Model 3 ASPs declined slightly, driven by mix in Asia, pricing action in EMEA. North American ASPs held flat as mix improved, offsetting pricing action we took at the start of the quarter, which is great to see. Note that with the release of Smart Summon in the U.
S, we were able to recognize $30,000,000 of deferred revenue. As we expand Smart Summon to additional markets and release new features, we'll continue to recognize additional deferred revenue. Our services and other loss reduced yet again, reflecting our focus to improve the efficiency of this area of the business, and we further reduced operating expenses despite increased orders, deliveries and new programs in development. And finally, on net income and other income, we saw benefits from foreign exchange, which, as I mentioned last quarter, we don't hedge. The second key point I want to highlight is that we demonstrated another quarter of strong free cash flows despite a significant increase in our captive leasing mix and a sequential increase in CapEx spend.
This has enabled year to date positive free cash flows for the company. Our cash balance increased by approximately the same amount as our free cash flows, and we exited the quarter with our highest quarter ending cash balance ever of just over $5,300,000,000 Specifically on captive leases, we've received a number of questions on how these are funded. We use our leasing warehouse and ABS sales to allow for captive leases without material use of cash. What's important to note here is that our warehouse and ABS flow through financing cash flow, and as a result, leases negatively impact free cash flow. This impact was material in Q3 as the lease rate increased substantially by 50%.
In addition, CapEx spend increased driven primarily by Gigafactory Shanghai and Model Y spending. We received a number of questions on why our capital spending appears low compared to prior levels even though there are multiple new projects launching and in development. As we noted in the shareholder letter this quarter and last quarter, this is because we've made great progress on improving our capital efficiency. My third and final point is around demand and growth. Our global order rate remains strong and continues to increase.
Despite increases to production levels, our order backlog has been growing, and quarter to date orders are significantly higher than at this point in last quarter. In the immediate term, we're focused on increasing production of Model 3 and S and X as quickly as we can. Bulk of this work involves continued optimization of existing equipment. We've also made targeted adjustments to pricing to better balance supply and demand. Our pace of execution on new factories and capacity expansion has increased significantly.
As Elon mentioned, the first phase of Gigafactory
Shanghai is already production ready, and we've been able
to pull in the growth, and
our financial health continues
to strengthen. We remain focused on our phase of growth, and our financial health continues to strengthen. We remain focused on reducing costs, which enables rapid investments in future programs and growth.
Thank you very much, and I think also our Senior Director of Energy Operations, Kunal Girhotra, wanted to have some remarks.
Hi everyone, my name is Kunal Girhotra and I've been with Tesla for about 4 years working on different aspects of deploying our energy products. I now run Tesla Energy's deployment and fulfillment teams. Over the last 3 months, the energy teams have made great progress in both our solar and energy storage businesses. As you can see in our quarterly deck, our solar deployments rose by almost 50% over last quarter and our energy storage deployments, which include power walls and power packs, grew by 15% to an all time high of 4 77 megawatt hours. In the last 3 months, we relaunched Tesla Solar in North America by simplifying our solar offering into 3 sizes of small, medium and large with transparent pricing on the website.
Actually, if I may inject, but what a lot of people don't realize is like in California and in a number of other states, if you buy our sort of solar subscription or solar rental, there's no money down and you instantly save on your utility bill and there's no long term contract. So it's kind of a no brainer. It's really, do you want something that prints money? And if it doesn't print money, we'll fix it or take it back. It's kind of a no brainer.
It sort of plays into Tesla's overarching strategy here, which is effectively to become like a giant distributed global utility on the energy front?
Yeah, absolutely. The subscription solar offering that you mentioned is launched in 6 states and like you said, it's 6 monthly payments and no long term contracts, and the response from customers has been pretty awesome.
Most people do actually buy it as opposed to rent it, which is actually the particularly the better while you make money immediately if you rent it, it's actually a better investment if you buy it because the cost of capital of the consumer is better than our cost of capital. Then there's an interesting study by Zillow and a number of other organizations that show that adding Zillow to your home increases the value of your home, and the Zillow study showed a 4% increase in the value of the home with solar. Then if you add sort of the power wall, which gives you blackout protection, so you will have energy security in the event of rolling blackouts or if the power goes up for any reason, which appears to be a long term systemic issue in California particularly, that I think is definitely going to be viewed as a significant asset for any home.
Totally, I think to your point of buying Tesla Solar is easy because we have one of the lowest prices in our nation now in the country and just a little bit of story there, we were able to lower our prices because our cost of acquisition is now less than a quarter of any typical solar company.
We don't do sales.
Yeah, we do online sales. There's no advertising,
no marketing and no sales force. But would you rather pay for power or for marketing? Yes. I'd say you would rather pay for the product.
Totally, yep, yep,
that's great. On solar, we've also simplified the fulfillment process with a goal of really fast order to install timelines. We've done many residential installs with a single digit to a customer's home because of standard sizes that reduce complexity. We've also been working with cities and counties to submit generic permits that follow a template rather than customize it for every situation.
Actually, Carlos is a really big deal. That's what most people would appreciate. It's great work by you and the energy team to get this done because one of the fundamental inhibitors, both from a cost and timing standpoint, is getting permit approval from the various regional authorities and we've pioneered a novel approach. It's sort of innovation applied to bureaucracy, frankly, which is actually applying innovation to anything, and we've gotten a massive number of housing approval authorities to take a generic template as opposed to a custom template, which makes it and in most cases I think electronic as well. So that just makes it simple and low cost and fast to get approval for solar, which is how it should be.
Totally, yeah, around 350 cities and counties have accepted it. There's still not And more coming. And many more coming, right.
Yeah, I think ultimately it will be almost everyone.
Yeah, yeah, we have
a lot more small cities and counties that have to come online, but that will be our focus in the coming days. And it's more important as we scale Solar Roof, too.
Yes, exactly.
Deploying energy products needs innovation, Hamza, in the bureaucracy space, as
you said as well.
I mean, yeah.
Yeah, so all these improvements have led us to speed up our customer order to installation timelines from months to, in many cases, days. As Elon, you already said, we've added the option to add Powerwalls to secure people from future power outages and the home with solar and Powerwall, as was shown in the recent California outages, many homes ran successfully.
Yeah, you can tell which homes have Powerwall because that's where the lights are on. Look at the neighborhood, it's like, oh, there's all but a few lights around, and it's usually the ones with the Tesla Powerwall. I don't know if you're going to mention, but also like the single truck roll. Single yes.
Single site visit install.
Single site visit install is a big deal. We've taken it from where the solar industry would often be 3 visits before the solar was installed, and it would often take quite a long time to do the installation, or it streamlined all of that to the point where in many cases it's a single visit to do everything, and it's fast. Yeah, that's correct. So it's a low, minimize disruption to the homeowner. And ordering solar is literally one click.
You can order solar for your house in less than 1 minute.
Yeah, and then we've done the same thing in the commercial solar space. Nobody thought of putting a simple left side with prices for commercial solar. We do that now and we've seen a good response from small businesses wanting to go solar. And by removing the complexity of long term contracts and simplifying the terms and conditions, the commercial solar sales process would typically take 6 months, is now taking a couple of weeks. So the same thing that we've done in residential, we want to expand more and more in commercial as well.
So all in all, the roadmap for energy products from solar, solar roof, Powerwall to Megapack is super exciting and I expect Tesla Energy to become a larger part of our overall ecosystem as we leverage and integrate the same competencies from our vehicle business. The future is pretty exciting for just Tesla Energy.
Great, I see.
Thank you very much. So first we're going to take some questions from say.com. We will this time take questions from both institutional investors as well as retail investors. So the first question from institutional investors is what are the opportunities for Tesla to create demand? Is word-of-mouth still sufficient, or should we expect to see Tesla Commerce advertising in the near future?
What we're seeing is that word-of-mouth is more than enough to drive our demand in excess production. We have no plans to advertise at this time. Obviously at some point in the future we may do advertising not in the traditional sense, but more just inform people and make sure that they are aware of the product, but not engage in the typical trickery that is commonplace in advertising.
Okay. The next question from institutional investor is, Elon, other than robotaxis and autonomous vehicle capabilities, when you look over the next 3 years, what are you most excited about at Tesla that you believe investors don't understand or have missed?
I think there's generally a lack of understanding or appreciation for the growth of Tesla Energy, as Kanal was talking about. In the long term, I expect Tesla Energy to be roughly the same size as Tesla's automotive sector or business. This is the most underperformed, I think it could be bigger, but it's certainly of a similar magnitude to Tesla solar, meaning Tesla solar plus battery stuff to Tesla Energy is I think the least appreciated element. Part of it is like for about 18 months, almost 2 years, we had to divert a tremendous amount of resources, or we basically take resources from everywhere else in the company and apply them to the Model 3 production, fixing the Model 3 production ramp and simplifying the design of Model 3. For about a year and a half, we unfortunately stripped Tesla Energy of engineering and other resources, and even it took the cell production lines that were meant for Powerwall and Powerpack and redirect them to the car because we didn't have enough cells.
Now that we feel that Model 3 production is in a good place and headed to a great place, we've restored resources to Tesla solar and storage, and so that's going to be I think, really crazy growth for as far as the future as I can imagine. We had to do it because if we didn't solve Model 3, Tesla wouldn't survive. So unfortunately, that shorted pretty much the other parts of the company, but it would be difficult for me to overstate the degree to which I think Tesla Energy is going to be a major part of Tesla's activity in the future. And Tesla's mission from the beginning has been to accelerate the advent of sustainable energy, that means sustainable energy generation and sustainable energy consumption in the form of electric vehicles. I think one of the stats we'll publish in the future along with our vehicle production is how much sustainable energy Tesla produced or Tesla customers produced with our products.
I think you'll see that we're producing about the same comparable amounts of sustainable energy as are consumed in the car, in our cars. For the longest time, the rebuttal against electric cars is like, don't they use dirty power from coal? Well, no, we're solar power, and obviously the solar power companies not that much as Tesla, but you have to sell sustainable generation as sustainable consumption, and that's what we're doing, and we'll do more of it.
Okay, thank you. The next question from investor is related to full self driving attach rates. Given that self driving regulations will evolve unevenly in different markets, would you consider selling modules individually, for example, Navigate and Autopilot or Summon versus current strategy of selling the package as a whole in order to encourage adoption and getting more data?
I think we'll continue to sell it in a bundled fashion. Any Tesla that you buy already has basic autopilot included, so I think that really is a pretty major advantage relative to other cars. Then the next step will be full self driving with Smart Summon being kind of the beginning of that. And obviously we kind of have the two sides of it. We're highway autopilot and we've got some in which is sort of low speed and talking lots and that kind of thing.
Now we need to, and we're working on solving the intermediate portion, which is traffic lights and stop signs, and navigating through windy narrow roads in suburban neighborhoods. That's the focus right now. You're going to want it all. It's something everyone's going to want for sure.
Okay.
As I said before, at the point at which we're able to upload software enabling hotels to become a robotaxi. Expect to have that from a functionality standpoint by the end of next year. But In terms of the functionality, so basic functionality aspirationally end of this year, but reliable enough that you do not need to pay attention, in our opinion, by the end of next year. The acceptance by regulatory authorities will vary by jurisdiction. That transition, that sort of flipping of the switch from a car that is from not robotaxi to robotaxi I think will probably be the biggest step change increase in asset value in history by far.
Okay, thank you. The next question is, with respect to Model Y, what is your latest expectations for launch timing? Do you anticipate any Model 3 production downtime at Fremont during the launch? And how should Model Y gross margin percent look compared to Model 3 gross margin?
Well, we've talked about the launch timing. What really matters is the timing to volume production, where volume production is some number in excess of 1,000 units per week, and we're confident of reaching that point earlier than the middle of 2020. From an interference standpoint, we do not expect it to interfere. The body line is separate. The paint line is basically we do not expect it to pair with Model 3.
We do not expect any downtime. From a margin standpoint, SAG, can you remind me?
Yes, from a margin perspective, we're expecting ASPs for Model Y to be slightly higher than they are for Model 3, and this is common in the industry between sedans and CUVs. The part that we've worked very hard on is controlling the cost of Model Y, and our steady state forecast for that program puts the cost at roughly equivalent to Model 3. So there will be ramp in efficiencies at first, of course, as we launch the program. But as it stabilizes with steady state production, we do expect that it'll be a higher margin product. It's something that we're very excited about within the company.
Okay, thank you. The last question from institutional investors is can you provide an update on FSD package attach rates? As FSB attach rates improve, will you let the financial benefits manifest in Hydro's margins for company and shareholders? Or will you lower the price to drive delivery volume?
I don't think we're going to need to lower the price of FSD. I expect the price of FSD to increase slowly as the functionality and capability improve. That is unchanged. Our cash gross margin obviously is higher than our GAAP gross margin because of unrecognized revenue associated with FSD attach rates, so that's why I think it's in the order
of $600,000,000 or in the order of half a 1000000000 500.
Up to half a 1000000000 of unrecognized revenue. So if you were to include that, which would largely be recognized as we released the full self driving functionality, the actual gross margin that we're operating on a cash basis today is higher than the GAAP gross margin.
Okay, let's now go to questions from retail investors. The first question from Craig is, can you provide more detail on the DeepScale acquisition, its importance and whether Tesla is still on track to recognize and respond to traffic lights and stop signs with automatic driving on City Streets by the end of 2019?
Sure. Dpscale is a very tiny company. It's basically about 12 people and they have some expertise in increasing the efficiency of neural nets for a given amount of compute, which I think is helpful. It remains to be seen, but the intent behind what was a very tiny acquisition was to, I think, slightly accelerate FSD. That's the intent and hopefully that will turn out to be true.
Okay, the second question we've already answered regarding Model Y delivery, so we'll jump to the 3rd question from Craig. News reports suggest that Gigafactory 3 already may already be producing Model 3s for Chinese market. Could you please update us on the production expectations for Giga 3 and confirm purpose of the 2nd building now being built? Is that for battery production as suggested by some press outlets?
Yes, we're in trial production of Model 3, basically sending cars through the Trujillo system, and we're ramping rapidly.
We're
expecting to hit volume production in a few months, essentially. The second building is indeed for battery and module production, and that's probably just possibly be a bunch more construction beyond what's already there, because obviously we need to build out facilities for Model Y production at Shanghai as well.
Okay. The next question from retail investors is can you update us on the initial results of Tesla car insurance? Is there a timeline to expand it nationally and internationally?
Yes, I can take that. So far we've launched Tesla Insurance in California. I have to say that I'm quite pleased by the results so far. The take rates as measured by quote to purchase conversion are quite high by industry standards and we expect that this will only increase as folks understand the products better and receive some of the known price increases coming from some of the standard carriers that they'll come to us and look for an alternative. There's a bunch of work happening behind the scenes on improving the product, particularly the purchase flow, to make sure it's the best product experience for our customers.
And we're also working very hard to get other states lined up in the States and then also to launch in some countries internationally. So we're not able to provide specific timelines on those changes, but we're definitely working as quickly as we can, given how well received Tesla insurance has been in California.
Yes, I think it also has a secondary effect of ensuring that the third party providers of insurance provide reasonable rates to our customers.
Completely agree. The goal here is not to have an outsized market share of insurance. It's just to make sure that customers have an alternative to other companies as well if those rates are high. I mean, ultimately, what makes the most sense for a total cost of ownership perspective is for folks to have a good pricing on their insurance.
Yes, exactly.
Okay. The last question from retail investors. There's skepticism regarding your comment that the full self driving will be feature complete by year end, like resulting from confusion about feature complete, what feature complete means. Could you please talk to this and perhaps give us a list of features that establish the FSD baseline?
No, in feature complete, I mean, the car is able to drive from one's house to work most likely without interventions. So it will still be supervised, but it will be able to drive, it will fill in the gap from low speed autonomy, low speed autonomy with some, and we've got high speed autonomy on the highway, and we need intermediate speed autonomy, which really just means track lights and stop signs. So, if you complete means it's most likely able to do that without intervention, without human intervention, but it would still be supervised. I've gone through this timeline before, I think several times, but it is often misconstrued that there's the 3 major levels to autonomy. There's the car being able to be autonomous but requiring supervision and intervention at times, that's future complete.
Then there's, and it doesn't mean like every scenario everywhere on earth, including every corner case, it means most of the time. Then there's another level which is that we think it's that from a Tesla standpoint, we think the car is safe enough to be driven without supervision. Then the 3rd level would be that regulators are also convinced that the car can be driven autonomously without supervision. Those are 3 different levels.
Okay, thank you very much. Shereen, we can now go to the questions from analysts.
Thank you. Our first question comes from Dan Galvez with Wolfe Research.
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I was hoping that you could give us a little bit more color on sizing up the key factors in the auto gross margin improvement from Q3 to Q2, particularly you mentioned some non recurring items in the letter. And also should investors be prepared for any meaningful headwinds as the China plant comes up, but isn't at full production yet?
Yes, I can provide a couple of comments on that. On your final on your last question about China headwinds, there are always ramp inefficiencies when we launch a new factory. So we don't expect China to be any different than that. So there will be some that we experienced in Q4. The amount of that is hard to forecast, given that it's a different type of factory design than we did here in Fremont.
We're working very hard to limit the ramp inefficiencies, but certainly fixed cost absorption and having all of the labor ready as we ramp have an impact on Q4. On the margin improvement, a couple of things there for auto gross margin. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, S and X average selling prices increased from Q2 to Q3. I mean that's important as I mentioned in the last earnings call, the prior powertrain versions of S and X provided significant headwinds on average selling price for that product in the quarter. We've also done a bunch of work as a company to become more targeted in how we adjust pricing on our products and how we optimize that based on local supply and demand.
And so I think there's a bunch of good work from the team on that in Q3, which flowed through on our financials. And cost reduction has just remained a huge focus for us. It's hard to underestimate how much of that has been ingrained in the culture of the company. And Jerome and his team have done absolutely tremendous work there. So on every line item of our costs, whether it be manufacturing, labor, warehousing, logistics, there's just a tremendous amount of good work that happened there.
Specifically on non recurring items, 2 that I'll note, one being the Smart Summon revenue recognition. Debatable whether that's considered recurring or not, given that we continue to expect to release more features and release revenue associated with that in the future. But we did want to call that out specifically and the dollar value around that. As we know, there's been speculation around the impact for the quarter. And foreign exchange is just something that, since we don't hedge, it has an impact and it comes and goes every quarter.
So we'll have to see as the quarter plays out the effect that that has.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Adam Jonas with Morgan Stanley.
Hi, everyone. This is George Daley on for Adam. So first question, is it a fair assumption to say that once the Shanghai Gigafactory is ramped, Model 3 sold in China for China could be the most profitable car you sell, even more profitable than the average car made at Fremont right now?
Valens also difficult to forecast. It's a good question. At least based on the plans that we have now, we're expecting it to be roughly in line with where Model 3 is coming out of our Fremont factory. There's still a bunch of work around cost optimization in the factory after we launch with ramp in efficiencies, and we need to work those costs down. And then there'll be work to land on what the right mix is within the country, and where we ultimately land on the product offering.
So I think just for now, it's safe to assume that it's roughly in line with the margins that you see coming out of the Fremont facility.
Great. And then if I could just sneak in one more. So it's been over 7 years since you launched the Model S, and many OEMs seem that they don't have the same commitment to battery electric vehicles that you do and many don't even offer one right now. As your business model proves to be more sustainable, could we potentially see Tesla maybe supplying other OEMs with batteries or software, complete electric vehicle architectures, maybe in an effort to accelerate mass adoption of sustainable transport? Yes, I think it would be consistent with the mission of Tesla to help other car companies with electric vehicles on the battery and powertrain fronts, possibly on other fronts.
So it's something we're open to. As I think a lot of people know, we open sourced our patents so that those would not serve as an obstacle to the adoption of electric vehicles or solar power or stationary storage, and we're definitely open to supplying batteries and powertrains and types of other things to other car companies.
Okay, thank you. Let's go to the next question, please.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Maynard with Macquarie.
Hi, thank you. I have two questions. The first is software version 10 added a lot of functionality that's never really been available in a car before through an over the air update. In your shareholder letter, you say that this lays an important foundation for things to come. Can you just talk about the longer term plan or your vision for the direction of the software platform and if you have plans to monetize that opportunity?
Well, the goal for the infotainment system is to say, what's the most amount of fun you can have in a car? I don't think other car companies really think about it that way, but surely, what is the most fun, how can we maximize the enjoyment of the car such that it's not some sort of transport utility device with no soul and no character. We want it to be fun and entertaining, irreverent, something that you love. And so I think there's a lot one can do because people are generally spending a couple of hours a day on average in the car, and so that's a pretty high percentage of their waking time outside of like showering and going to the bathroom and that kind of thing. It's a lot of time.
I guess maybe there's some way to monetize it, but we haven't really thought about it that way. It revolves just to make and say what is the most fun you could possibly have while you're in your car. Obviously as autonomy gets better and better, that is going to become much more of an entertainment opportunity. So we'll see where that leads, but that's what we're after, it's our goal.
Great, and then can you help us the opportunity for mission credits as the standards in the EU start to tighten next year? And I'm not looking for an exact number, but maybe more to understand whether this is an opportunity in the tens of 1,000,000, 100 of 1,000,000,000,000, anything to help us frame the opportunity and also whether you have any ongoing dialogues with OEMs? Thanks.
We certainly have ongoing dialogues with OEMs, but as you see from our financials, the tax credits or emissions credits are not forming a very big percentage of our revenue. I mean, so what was it, last quarter it was pretty quite
It was over $100,000,000 But
out of like several 1,000,000,000, so it's like 1.5%. It's not exactly a giant percentage. And obviously, those credits in the U. S. Are really not, you know, the credit situation not particularly strong for obvious reasons, which we think is not great for the future, but anyway, that's the way it is.
In Europe there's much more of a sensitivity to the environment, but we're not counting on some big windfall. Maybe it will be good, maybe not, we don't know, but we're not counting on it.
Yes, I think that's a fair way to characterize it. I mean our expectations are that credit revenues will generally increase with time, not necessarily increasing every quarter. We did increase from Q2 to Q3, but there's a certain amount of them that are baseline based on the number of cars that we build and deliver, and there's others that are deal specific, and those deals can happen at any point. So we're constantly in conversations with automakers about this. But within the company, we manage the business without counting on any profit or cash flows from regulatory credits, and we view it as purely incremental.
My recommendation is that everyone should view it that way. It's just an extra as it comes through.
It's obviously a good thing to do that would help accelerate the advent of sustainable energy for sure, but it's,
and like I said, outside
the U. S. There seems to be a strong push in that direction, which is great, and probably within the U. S. That over time will become a strong push.
Thank you, let's go to the next question, please.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Emmanuel Rosner with Deutsche Bank.
Dennis Hinnant for Emmanuel. Thanks for taking our questions. First, there's been a lot of activity in the industry about electric pickups lately. Just curious if you have any updates, any more insights you can share on the one that you're about to put out later? And then secondly, there was a comment I think earlier about the order book quarter to date.
Can you just clarify what was the baseline and any insights about the geographic mix of that? Thanks.
I think we've said enough about the Tesla Cybertruck. This is not the right forum for us to do product launches, but I think it will be, I mean my opinion, and this could be totally wrong, it could be totally out to lunch here, but I think the Tesla Cybertruck is our best product ever. That's my opinion. And demand seems to be strong, so we should be production constrained this quarter.
Yes, that's right. The baseline from the comment earlier that I made was looking at this point in the quarter and Q2, And order rates are strong, I would say, in all markets. I think we're very encouraged as a team at the reception of our products. As more and more people become aware of electric vehicles, I think competitive products help raise that awareness, and overall interest is just increasing. So our focus internally is to increase production as fast as we can, both with existing equipment and accelerating our timelines on new capacity.
We believe that everybody should be driving an electric car, so we need to move as quickly as we
can. Yeah, absolutely. We want to get the Tesla volume to where it is perhaps somewhere on the order of 1%, replacing 1% of the global fleet over time. That's, I think, the global fleet's pretty big, but we think that's a good one to aim for, which is about 20,000,000 vehicles a year, just by the way. But I do think that the demand for new cars will rise as the world transitions away from combustion engine vehicles, just as people had CRT TVs, there's no more cathode ray 2 TVs, the sales rate was just basically a replacement rate.
You wouldn't really buy a new CRT TV unless you were broke. But when flat screens came out, there was a big step change in demand because now getting a big flat screen TV was much better than having a small CRT TV. I think we'll see the same thing with electric vehicles, which is that instead of just people just buying a car just because their last car wore out, they'll buy an electric car because it's a fundamentally better car, and especially if it's got self driving.
Thank you. Let's go to the next question, please.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Pierre Ferragu with New Street Research.
Hi, thank you for taking my question. I'd love to see how your
Hi, Pierre. We cannot hear you.
It's very quiet, so we can't hear
you. Can you hear me well?
It's muffled, but we'll try.
Okay. Sorry for that. So I was wondering how your thinking has evolved on Model S and Model X. It looks like the deliveries have stayed to the levels of the previous quarter and that Model 3 has indeed cannibalized this demand for these cars quite a good deal. So how are you thinking about these 2 models going forward?
What's the strategy you have in mind? And I have a quick follow-up on the model why.
The Model S and X are really niche products. They're very expensive, made in low volume. To be totally frank, we're continuing to make them more for sentimental reasons than anything else. They're really of minor importance to the future.
Okay, that makes sense. Then my question
They're a great car. The Model S, I think, is by if you want to I mean, the Model S literally won Motor Trend's best car ever in history, by the way. I think if you're out there and you're buying and you're standing by and you don't buy a Model S, I think you just made a mistake, to be totally frank. It's incredible, especially the new one with the variable dampening, suspension, hospital operating room, HEPA filter for air purification, the Raven powertrain, which is the fastest car in the world. It's so easy to drive, it makes you feel like Superman driving that car.
It's incredibly safe, it's just an amazing vehicle. Then Model S, I think, is like the Faberge egg of cars. I mean, they aren't Model X. Model X is like the Faberge egg of cars. That's why so many artists and musicians buy the carts, it's an art piece, basically.
Yes, I mean, just to add, I agree, they're absolutely phenomenal cars, and we are increasing production on our S and X lines for this quarter in response to increasing demand. And so I think part of the story here is as we've launched, ramped and stabilized Model 3, that's kind of consumed a lot of the attention around the company. But now that as that has stabilized, we're able to focus our attention and balance that between S and X and Model 3. And so the delivery numbers in Q3 understated the interest in the product for that quarter, and we continue to see strength in the order rate, which we anticipate will be reflected in S and X deliveries in Q4.
Yes, I mean, the Model S, the basic Model S at this point has a range of 370 miles. Actually technically it's 373, but we actually certified it incorrectly as 370, but it's 373. There are some software improvements that we think will make that even better. We have to mention, we're also expecting that there's going to be an over there that will improve the power of the Model S, X and 3. That's, by the way, it's coming in a few weeks, should be on the order of 5% power improvements due to improved firmware.
Drew, do you want to say anything on that?
Yes, we just continue to learn how to optimize the motor control in our products and yes, so 5% improvement for all Model 3 customers and 3% for S and X.
Yes, and there's also the single pedal driving that will improve the range as well.
Very excited about that. It's an improvement in comfort and feel.
Yes, it's easier to drive and it improves the range.
Yes. And faster supercharging.
Oh, faster supercharging.
For standard range and standard range bus customers, which is a big deal.
I don't think there's ever been a situation in history where you buy a car and it gets way better over time just due to software. I feel a little bit better, but a lot.
It's very exciting. I think as a customer myself, I enjoy these updates.
I always look forward to them. Yes, it might move the Model S range to almost 380 or high 370s with the update.
And we're not stopping to work there. We'll continue working on their development.
Yeah, absolutely.
Pierre, did you have a follow-up question?
Yes, yes. Just a quick one on the Model Y. So I was wondering if you what you've learned with S and X makes you think maybe when you launch Model Y, you'll have some cannibalization of demand of the Model 3. Have you started to think about that and how to approach it?
No, I don't think we're not expecting to see a cannibalization of Model 3. 1's a sedan, 1's a SUV.
Yeah, the best comparison we have for that is when we launched Model X and we had Model S at the time.
Yeah, Model S sales increased.
Yeah, and we didn't see any cannibalization there.
The opposite. When we launched Model X, Model S sales increased.
That's the best comparison that we have.
Great, thank you very much. Let's go to the next question.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Dan Levy with Credit Suisse.
Hi, good evening. Thank you for taking the questions. First, just wanted to ask a question on Giga 3. You're targeting 3,000 units a week, but we saw with Fremont that the ramp on Model 3 was lumpy and you sort of ramp and then sort of cut production to fix the bottlenecks. Given this is brand new capacity, how smooth should we expect production to be on a week to week basis?
Meaning once you hit the 3,000, is that 3,000 you could go every single week in a quarter or is it still going to be lumpy within a quarter? I
mean, if you've got a crystal ball, we'd love to use it. I'm looking for it. Yeah. It should be smoother than Model 3 because there's a lot of commonality with parts, and I think if you look over a reasonable enough time frame, the production will actually be fairly smooth. But from a week to week standpoint, it obviously will not be.
It will be about as smooth as, say, the stock market. How smooth is the stock market from 1 week to the next? But if you just extend the time period to, say, 2 or 3 quarters, it will be a very rapid study ramp, and obviously it will go way past 3,000 a week.
Okay, great. Thank you.
And then just
a follow-up, you mentioned, Elon, you mentioned earlier in your comments that one of the things you're optimistic on in the future is Tesla Energy, and I think we understand the part that one of the challenges in the past was sort of a reallocation of resources away from energy to the auto side. Could you just talk to where you see the greatest pockets of growth in energy? Is it solar or storage? And now that you have to now that you can reallocate resources, what would that entail in terms of capacity growth? Or what does reallocation of resources look like?
Well, I think on a percentage basis, solar will grow the fastest, but storage will also grow high on a percentage basis. I think both over time will grow faster than automotive, starting from smaller bays. I think especially if you look at sort of year over year growth, it will be absolutely incredible, I think. From 1 quarter to the next, there might be some fluctuations due to seasonality or some short term part shortage or you name it, but over the course of say a year, gigantic increase. Also with solar, it's hard to install a lot of solar in the winter, especially on the East Coast, roofs full of snow and ice, so you would expect to see some seasonality there, but then it ramps up quite a bit as the weather improves.
Okay, thank you very much, and I think that's unfortunately all the time we have today. Appreciate all your questions, and we're looking forward to talking to you next quarter. Thank you very much, and goodbye.
All right, thanks.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.