Earnings Call: Q1 2018

May 2, 2018

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Tesla Q1 2018 Financial Results and Q and A and Web As a reminder, this conference may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's call, Mr. Martin Viecha, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin. Thank you, Sherry, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Tesla's Q1 2018 Q and A webcast. I'm joined today by Elon Musk, JB Straubel, Deepak Ahuja and Doug Field. Our Q1 results were announced at about 1 pm Pacific Time in the update letter we published at the same link as this webcast. During this call, we will discuss our business outlook and make forward looking statements. These comments are based on our predictions and expectations as of today. Actual events or results could differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those mentioned in our most recent filings with the SEC. Before jumping into Q and A, Elon has some opening remarks. Elon? I think our letter says most of it, but I think we're going to spend extra time on Q and A and try to answer as many questions as possible. I think we should really be able to answer. So we're going to go as long as there are good questions to answer. The thing I'm most excited about is the rapid increase in output. We've got just in the last 2 or 24 hours at Gigafactory, we managed to achieve a sustained rate of over 3,000 packs per day, sorry, per week and actually reached the peak hour with extrapolated outward would be a rate of over 5,000 cars per week. Obviously, you cannot take a peak hour and assume every peak is every hour is as good as the peak. But if you can achieve it even once in an hour, then with continued refinement of the system and improved operational uptime of the machinery, it means that you can achieve that sustained rate with more refinement. So you spend essentially a month or 2 improving the operational uptime and the system as a whole will be able to do well over 5,000, I think. And what I mean, what's interesting is that at least in the case of pack production, we were able to do this with minimal CapEx. And I think in general, our understanding of production is improving dramatically, exponentially in fact and we are seeing ways to achieve improved volume with dramatically less CapEx by simplifying the production line, by really engaging all of our associates, no matter how junior in improving the way that parts are made. It's amazing how everybody has got good ideas, just needs to solicit those ideas and implement them. And then making ongoing design improvements so that when we discover that something is not well designed for manufacturing, that we would very quickly change that part design and introduce that into the flow. One of the things we've also found is that there's some things that are very well suited to manual operation and some things that are very well suited to automated operation and the 2 should not be confused. So I should be clear that the vast majority of the Tesla production system is automated. However, as I mentioned in a tweet a few months ago, we did go too far on the automation front and automated some pretty silly things. One example would be we have this sort of ironically bullish. We had these fiberglass mats on the top of the battery pack. They're basically fluff. So we try to automate the placement and bonding of fluff to the top of the battery pack, which is ridiculous. So we had FlufferBot, which was really an incredibly difficult machine to make work. Machines are not good at picking up pieces of fluff. Human hands are way better at doing that. And so we had a super complicated machine using a vision system to try to put a piece of fluff on the battery back. That same one of the questions asked was do we actually need that. So we tested a car with and without and found that there was no change in the noise volume in the cabin. So we actually had a part that was unnecessary, that was of course, the line kept breaking down because PloverBot would frequently just be able to pick up the fluff or put it in like a random location. So that was one of the silliest things I found. We're also and this still remains to be fixed, but in other cases, but we're overgeneralizing the design. So for example, the current battery pack has a port for the front drive units, which we then put a blanking plate, a sealed blanking plate on. So essentially, we punch a hole in it, then put a blanking plate of the hole and do that for all rear drive unit cars, which is kind of crazy. We've added cost. We've added a manufacturing step. We've added a failure mode and for something that is unnecessary. So that is something that's an example of something that's changed. So the result is we've had a radical improvement in production, factory pack production went from taking 7 hours to make a pack 3 weeks ago to under 70 minutes now. So just to show that's like really radical improvements are indeed possible. We also saw enormous improvement in Zone 4 of module production. This, I should point out, is a fully automated zone. And we're able to also achieve a sustained rate of 3,000 vehicles a week. So we're actually slightly ahead in battery module and pack production than expected. And with some work at the Fremont vehicle plant, primarily in the general assembly area, I'm confident we will very soon exceed the 3,000 mark in Fremont. So we're already there in the body shop, also almost entirely automated, where we weld up the body. They were already capable of over 3,000 cars a week. And then in general assembly, there's some improvements, which will include reduction some reduction I should say temporary reduction in automation in a few places, then we should be over 3,000. So basically, I'm feeling really good about the Tesla production model 3. And I am very proud of the work that the team has done. It's been an amazing amount of hard work and sacrifice by some very talented people to achieve this outcome. It's worth noting you see a chart in the Model 3 market share versus competitors in midsized premium sedans. We are almost the best selling sedan in the United States in this category and as of April, and we will certainly be there in May. And that's something really odd. I mean, we'll be there in May and then really be there later this year. Like in the Q3, I think there's a good chance Model 3 gets maybe close to majority market share of midsized premium sedans, 30% to 40% seems likely and maybe a majority market share later this year. This is coming from a standing start against a lot of established brands who have far more sales outlets than we do. So this is very encouraging. And yes, as the letter says, I'm feeling quite confident about achieving GAAP net income and positive cash flow in Q3. This is not obviously a certainty, but it does appear quite likely in my view. We are going to conduct sort of a reorganization, restructuring of the company in the next this month and make sure we are well set up to achieve that goal. And in particular, the number of sort of third party contracting companies that we're using has really gotten out of control. So we're going to scrub the barnacles on that front. It's pretty crazy. We've got barnacles on barnacles. So there's going to be a lot of barnacle removal. Thank you, Yolanda. Sherry, let's go to the first question. You. Our first question comes from Brian Johnson with Barclays. Yes, good afternoon. I want to talk a little bit about some of the first of all, if we talk about the 3,000 sort of all relate to the production ramp. If we talk about the 3,000 5,000 per week run rate, is that assuming 724 or at what point do you think you get to sort of 5 day 2 shift operation? Well, first of all, I think a 5 day, 2 shift operation is a ridiculous way to operate because that would be a very poor use of CapEx, nor is it the way that we have operated in for most of Tesla. So the module production or cell module and factory pack production and powertrain production have always operated on a 20 fourseven basis. And the exception has been general assembly, which is operated on typically 2 to 3 shifts, sort of a 5 to 6 day, 20 hour shift and paint, which is operated on kind of a 6 day basis. So I think it makes sense to operate the whole company on the same basis. But a majority of Tesla has always operated majority of Tesla production has operated on 20 fourseven basis since we started production. Yes. I mean, this is JB. I can chime in. As Elon said, it really makes great use of the CapEx in the lines. And that's why we did it starting way back with the beginning of S. But aligning everything to the same shift schedule makes it so much more efficient because we don't have the seesaw of inventory, the underlying inventory between the different shops. Exactly. One of the key things to improving capital efficiency of the system is reducing work in progress work in process. And if you don't have if the ships are not aligned, then you have to build up inventory in kind of a storage warehouse. And then yes, so it's pretty bullish to actually operate on a 5 day 2 shift thing anyway. But this is sort of we're using the chip fab approach to capital efficiency, so it's going to be called AWS, not out on web service, sort of onshore it's called, but like there's a alternate work, whatever, alternate work week, yes. I think we work like 3 long days and then 4 long days ultimately, something like that. So multiple crews rather than just using overtime when we get to the system. Yes, exactly. Right. So it seems like just doing the math. So like one person working 24 hours a day, 70 days a week. There are like 4 or 5 shifts. Yes. So if I just do the math, that would seem at 5,000 to get you to attack time of 2 minutes. And I go back to some of the prior conversations. I mean, that's my understanding is best in class is sort of 50 seconds to a minute. And I thought the whole going faster than Grandma Walker was actually targeted at blowing past that. It sounds like you're sort of 2x the tact time of other factories. The number you're referring to actually general the general Vehicle per minute. Yes. Yes, yes. It's general assembly number, not other stuff. But You may have also not taken into account so called OEE or the actual uptime of the line, which tends to make the tack time a little faster than the perfect tacklers. Yes. Let's say that could take some minute then, but I don't mean it's like over a 7 day, 24 hour work. Like we could also just say, like sure, we did our peak pack production today was 32 packs in an hour. So we're under a minute under 2 minutes a pack and rising from there. Yes. And the numbers go up rapidly as we go to the sub assemblies that are in higher unit quantity per car. Yes. So 4x per module and then we have smaller sub assemblies still that are factors of 10 or 20, even higher than that. Yes. That said, I do believe that the path to manufacturing efficiency is velocity and density and that is absolutely what we'll be working on Rather than just trying to spend 1,000,000,000 of dollars on duplicating your factory, If you make like if 2 companies are competing and one has to double its CapEx in order to double production and the other one can with minor CapEx can just speed up the line by double. It's a game over. Right. But in the meantime, the line is going to I think what you're saying, some starts, some stops to get to the 5,000 per week? Yes, you can't have like 0 maintenance time and 0 like you have to do equipment upgrades, you have to ongoing maintenance. So you can't just have it be operating at peak rates 20 fourseven. Okay, thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Rod Lachky with Deutsche Bank. Hi, everybody. Just wanted to follow along on that line of questions. So to the extent that you're adding humans in certain automated processes, can you just help us interpret the extent to which these changes affect the economics on Model 3? And to the extent that you've done some competitive analysis, all of these efforts in the Tesla production system, how do you stack up competitively against other OEMs in terms of labor hours per vehicle or depreciation per vehicle? Well, I'll say some few things, and then I have Deepak can elaborate. So the thing that I've noticed is if you have a really complicated machine, like the fluff bot that I was talking about earlier, in order to keep it operating, you have to have a ton of maintenance engineering. So you have like basically pretty expensive maintenance engineers that have to maintain the thing and fix it like basically 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. The cost of the maintenance and share may not be incorporated directly into or fully incorporated directly into gross margin, but it's nonetheless a cost that far exceeds the labor cost of simply placing the fluff on the battery pack, which as it turns out was unnecessary. So I think actually I do not see this having a mature long term impact in our cost. I actually see most likely our cost will decrease. Fully considered costs of producing the vehicles will decrease by getting rid of production stations that are really poorly suited to robotics because of the very expensive cost of robot technicians. Rod, we are very CapEx efficient overall. Let me just start from that point. And if we look at our depreciation cost on a per unit basis at steady run rate of 5,000 or so cars per week, we are in my mind well below a lot of our maybe most of our competitors, we are below $2,000 per unit depreciation cost. And then overall, clearly there is some impact as we have indicated in the letter from the additional labor we've added, but it's temporary. And our expectation fully is a lot of this labor will come out once we stabilize production and then figure out smart ways of automating where it makes sense. Okay. Thanks for that. And just secondly, your comments in your letter on the advances in batteries were interesting. Could you give us some insight into how we can translate that into cost per kilowatt hour or some metric in terms of the gains that you're making? That's something every data point, Rod, that we look at internally suggests that we are best in class, but we don't We're best in class. Yes, we're the best, sorry. Best in class of 1. Yes. I think directionally Rod, it's helpful to understand the different commodities and the trends that we're pursuing in the batteries. Being on a path to reduce cobalt usage, for instance, has been something we've been working on for literally several years now. And this has been extremely helpful in the overall cost per kilowatt hour, especially with recent commodity price movements. So I think we can't really be quantitative, but that directionally is a pretty good trend. Yes. We think we can get the cobalt to almost nothing. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you very much. Let's have the next question please. Thank you. Our next question comes from Adam Jonas with Morgan Stanley. Thanks. Elon, so you repeatedly said, I think in recent weeks that you do not need to issue equity capital at Tesla. And I think many investors on this call would say it's better to raise capital when you don't need to. So I guess the first question is, yes, you may not need to, but do you want to? No. I specifically don't want to. Perfect. Okay. My follow-up, Elon, is your cars produce really a large amount of data and SpaceX gets into the satellite broadband business next year. Somewhere in the space That will. Yes. Okay. Not next year, but it's probably 3 years. Okay, 3 years. Yes. Thank you for that. Some argue that SpaceX could offer Tesla resilient cyber secure pipe for this precious vehicle data and a potential competitive advantage. So Elon, isn't bandwidth an obvious domain for collaboration between Tesla and SpaceX one day? I mean, it might be. There's lots of interesting things you could do. Costs got a lot of computing power and it's connected to cell networks and Wi Fi and everything, and we could certainly connect it to Elio Internet Constellation. I haven't even thought about it, but probably there is. Thanks. Thank you. Let's go to the next question, please. Thank you. Our next Elon, you talked about the downtime on the Model 3. You're going to take 2 planned periods this quarter. One's already occurred. The other is going to occur later in the quarter. What specifically have you addressed in Fremont so far? And what are you planning to address a little bit later? And are those alone kind of remaining bottlenecks for you to get to the 5 ks within the Fremont plan? Well, the Tesla production system at this point is fast. And we literally have the 2 biggest factories on earth between the Gigafactory and Fremont. Gigafil is slightly smaller than Fremont. I think maybe just, yeah, slightly smaller footprint, but it will soon be bigger than Fremont. And Fremont is like the 2nd biggest building of any kind by footprint. So it's just like this it is a vast the full answer to that question is a complex one. I feel very confident about our ability to get to 5 ks very soon sustained rate at Giga, getting to essentially getting to 5,000 battery packs and motors and power inverters and charges and that kind of thing sold under a giga by the end of next month. And body production, no problem. General assembly is probably our biggest risk And I'm refocusing personally on that a lot in the next coming month. And then our paint shop is smooth, 2nd biggest risk after general assembly. These are all pretty these are all quite manageable. It's not like huge brain surgery to get these things right. There's a lot of work. Like I said, it's a lot of time and hard work, but it's very doable and yeah, it's just really quite straightforward. It's like not like a fundamental impediment here. And in many cases, we've seen huge gains through software, software that's in the car, software that controls the automation and connects to our central system. So in many cases, it's not even hardware upgrades that create substantial increases in velocity. Yes, exactly. Doug makes a good point here. And I think that the production a really great production system is primarily a software problem and there is no one in the auto industry that is remotely as good as Tesla as software as Tesla. I mean, Tesla is way better at software than any other car company. So if it is what I'm saying is true that the biggest challenge in a production system is software, we are in a good position. Okay. Maybe taking my next question in a different direction. What is your timeline for launching the Model Y and have you begun to spend for this or that only begin to start hitting the P and L from an R and D and a CapEx perspective in 2019? It will only start to become significant in 2019. Okay. So all of the CapEx spend for this year is associated with Fremont Model 3 Gigafactory? No, no, I mean, please take it literally. I said, it will only become significant next year. It's not 0 right now, but it's not a big number relative to our revenue. But in the early days of product development, anyway, there's not much CapEx. CapEx comes much later as you're committed to equipment and equipment starts to come in house. Although it is remarkable, like although the amount of money spent in the beginning is really quite low, program. Decisions made at the beginning of development program have massive implications for future CapEx. So it is better to spend a bit more time making the right design decisions and really thinking through the producibility of a product before racing ahead with CapEx decisions. There is no question we could have made the Model 3 much easier to produce than we have. Model Y, I think Model Y is going to be a manufacturing revolution. It will be, I think, incredible from a manufacturing standpoint because we do not want to go through this pain again. Yes. Our next question comes from Ramesh Shah with Nomura Instinet. Hi. Yes, I just wanted to clarify the gross margin comments related to Model 3 that you put in the letter. You said a couple of things you said over the medium term Model 3 gross margins would be below the target of 25%. You also said that in Q3 and Q4 that those gross margins would be highly positive. So I'm just trying to understand what's possible for Model 3 gross margins by the end of the year. Could we get to a number that's close to 20%? Rumi, what I'd say is that progressively each quarter we will be getting better. And it will come down to what other economics come into play from currencies to commodities and how much more cost we take out from labor. So I don't want to give you a specific number, but we'll be close to it. It's like yes, exactly. It's very yes, exactly very, very close to 20%, could be slightly below, could be slightly above. Okay. Fair enough. And then, Elon, can I just ask you about Sorry, just going a little further forward than, say, Q4, we're very confident of a 25% gross margin? Thanks for clarifying that. Yes, we feel very good about that. For next year, 25%, is definitely what we expect. So when you say medium term, you're talking 2018? Yeah, exactly. That's why it's important to clarify what these things mean. Q4 is when we expect to be on or about 20%. Then by the middle of next year, 25% gross margin should be where we are. And then we'll also try to get to the high 20s by the end of next year. Okay. As a follow-up, could you just comment on Jim Keller's departure, highly respected chip architect? What does it say, if anything, about the development of Tesla's custom silicon and autopilot? Thank you. Well, Jim is a great guy. And there's sort of a dream he won't pursue for a long time, which is to kind of redesign how server architecture works. It's not something that I find a lot interesting, but it's something that Jim, it's been a sort of personal dream of gems to do. And that's why I went to Intel. The design of the Tesla hardware is primarily led by Pete Bannon, though I should be clear, like the lead designer of that is Pete Bannon, who is still with Tesla. And then of course, Andre Carpathi is head of our AI team. So we don't plan to hire a replacement for Jim's position. Our next question comes from Toni Sacconaghi with Bernstein. Yes, thank you. I just wanted to follow-up on the previous question and the gross margin targets. I think you had said last quarter that once you got to 5,000 units, you felt that you could get to 25% gross margins on Model 3. So that feels like at least a 6 or 9 month delay relative to what you thought a quarter ago. And I'm trying to understand what the key drivers are. Is it really the labor for capital substitution? I don't think currency sequentially has changed much. I understand it can be a headwind, but I think relative to when you made those statements, it hasn't changed. So perhaps you can help us understand what has changed in terms of the gross margin ramp for Model 3 relative to what you thought before? And I have a follow-up, please. Yes, it's along the lines of what we said in the letter. If we look at the combination of the recently imposed tariffs Section 232 and countervailing duties, plus commodity price increases as well as the weaker dollar. That is adding significant material cost. And then temporarily, we are using more labor. So when you combine those 2, that's what led to our guidance. And certainly the material, the labor cost piece we will address and that will come out. Yeah, but I mean, we're talking about a 3% to 5% difference. So like and it's something that we'll solve like within 3 to 6 months later. So it's like some case out of it. Okay. And then separately, what, if anything, are you taking out in terms of your lower CapEx projection for this year? And specifically, in spending less than $3,000,000,000 where does that take you in terms of both battery and production capacity for the Model 3? Yes. So we're just being much more smarter in many cases. As Elon said, we are not just spending money on automation. We are first looking at the problem simplifying it and that's helped us reduce our CapEx on Model 3. And then we are also being critical about how we grow our infrastructure and line it up with our growth in our business. So we feel that these are the right decisions and there is still room for us to reduce it further if we wish to. So we are leaving ourselves some discretion here to go spend money where needed. And so where specifically will you be in terms of capital requirements? Next. Boring bonehead questions are not cool. Next. Thank you. Our next question comes from Joseph Spak with RBC Capital Markets. Thank you. The first question is related to the Model 3 reservations. And I was just wondering if you could give us a gauge as maybe some of the impact that the news has had. Like of the reservations that actually opened and made available to configure, can you let us know like what percentage have actually taken a step to configure? We're going to go to YouTube. Sorry, these questions are so dry. They're killing me. Thank you. Our next question is from Galileo Russell with HyperChange. Hey, great quarter. Thanks for having me on the call to represent retail investors. I was wondering with Waymo's plans to launch an autonomous taxi service in limited markets this year, if you could give us an update on the Tesla network and any details surrounding the launch date or geographic rollout? Thanks. Sure. So I mean that's thank you for interesting question. The launching goal where things are obviously evolving towards is a shared electric autonomy model. So, in order for this to obviously for the whole sort of system to work, you need all the pieces in place. You have full autonomy, 4 or 5, what do you want to call it and obviously a lot of cars in the road and then both the software infrastructure behind that to enable shared autonomy to enable people to share their cars and be able to offer their cars as effectively kind of a robo Lyft or robo Uber. Sort of like a combination of like, I guess, Uber, Lyft and Airbnb type of thing, where you can own your car and have a higher percentage of autonomous electric car. You can say it's available generally to anyone who wants to use it. When you're not using it, you can recall it at will. You can restrict usage to only friends and family or only users who are 5 star. Like this is like the obvious thing that's going to happen. In order for that to be in place, we have to obviously sell full autonomy. We are making really good progress on that front. I believe that the current production of the current vehicles that we're currently producing are capable of full autonomy with the only thing that would really be like might be needed or maybe is probably needed is a computer upgrade to have more processing power for the Vision Neural Net. But that's a plug in replacement, a thing that can be done quite easily. So I think we're really well positioned and are building the foundation for having millions, ultimately tens of millions of shared autonomous electric vehicles, which you can like I said, decide not to share if you don't want to. And then it plays And specifically on the timing though, do you have any details about or when we could even expect to learn more about the timing of this service? Well, the hardest thing to predict about the timing is regulatory approval. The thing that's tricky with autonomous vehicles is that autonomy doesn't reduce the accident rate or fatality rate to 0. It improves it substantially, but the reality is that even though we think autonomy even current autonomy reduces the probability of a death by 30%, which would be incredible because it's like broadly, there's over 1,000,000, I think 1,200,000 automotive deaths per year. And how many do you read about? Basically none of them. However, but if it's an autonomous situation, it's headline news. And the media fails to mention that actually, they shouldn't really be writing the story. They should be writing a story about how autonomous cars are really safe. But that's not the story that you want to click on. So they write inflammatory headlines that are fundamentally misleading to the readers. That's really outrageous. So and this will be true even if electric cars were sorry, autonomous cars were 10 times safer, so instead of 1,000,000 deaths, you had 100,000 deaths. There's still going to be people who will still sue and say, hey, you're responsible for the death here. It's like, well, the 90% of people who didn't die are not suing. They are still alive. They just don't know it. So we got to deal with that and then obviously regulators respond to public pressure and the press. So if the press is hounding the regulators and the public is laboring on the misapprehension that autonomy is less safe because of misleading press, then this is where I find the challenge of predicting it to be very difficult. And yeah, it's really incredibly irresponsible of any journalist with integrity to write an article that would lead people to believe that Tesla autonomy is less safe, because people might actually turn it off and then die. So anyway, I'm really upset by this. Yeah, really interesting answer. Thank you. I could answer, say, from a technical standpoint, I think we'll probably be ready by the end of next year. Awesome. And then one more quick thing on production capacity and speed of the Fremont line, because this is something you mentioned a lot at teams. And in the last quarterly conference call, you mentioned the max capacity was 700,000 cars for Fremont or somewhere around there and that was SX and 3. And so we recently got a report from Reuters saying that Model Y production would start in November 2019 at Fremont. And so I'm just kind of curious with the semi and the Model Y launching next year, like where are you actually planning on assembling these vehicles? The Reuters report is based on nothing. Like I don't know where that came from. We will not be starting production model wide at the end of next year. I would say it's probably closer to 24 months from now. So 2020 is a more likely prospect for Model Y, early 2020. And the production location for Model Y has not been decided. We are really crowded here at Fremont. I don't know where we the Model Y production. So it's difficult to imagine that. We just could not fit the Model Y production at Fremont. We are jammed to the gills here. So one thing I'm not sure is not here. It is crazy packed and we're yes. So we're trying to figure out what the optimal location is for the Model Y production, but it's not here. Okay. And I am not an expert in battery pack technology, but it seems that a lot of people are speculating that the specs for the semi truck, even I believe the CEO of Daimler said it breaks the laws of physics. So I'm wondering, is this just a linear He knows so much about physics. I know him. I'm pretty happy to engage in a physics discussion with him. I actually studied business in college. So yes, my question is, is that just a linear improvement in your battery technology? Roads are going to be built on? Like even if we didn't improve our battery technology at all, we could achieve a 500 mile range truck at all. We're going to do better than 500 miles. Yes, this is JB. I think the key point is it doesn't require some dramatic breakthrough. So there's a fundamental misunderstanding I think of what the current technology in our existing products can actually do. And maybe that's just the misunderstanding of sort of the current status of the technology versus others in the industry. That could be where some of that's coming from. If they're benchmarking sort of the best battery pack they can buy from a supplier and then mapping that what the semi could do, it doesn't give you it doesn't solve. I think that's maybe where some of it's coming from, but we basically have what we need in house and understand how to do those specs today or better as Elon said. We could do a 500 mile range semi today. I think the actual production unit will be above 600 mile range. Awesome. Great stuff. So I am also wondering, are you guys going to let Porsche beat you to market with a 3 50 kilowatt hour supercharger? Because I know you mentioned E3. Questions are not boring. Yes, I can keep going. Yes, that's cool. Yes. So the 350 kilowatt charger from Porsche, like they mentioned they're rolling that out. On the last call, JV seemed to indicate that you guys were sort of going to keep the status quo with your supercharger technology. But Elon, I know you've mentioned that there is a V3 supercharger. So I'm just trying to get some clarity on whether you will be improving your supercharger technology or not and if there is a V3. We're definitely going to be improving our supercharger technology. The thing about a 350 kilowatt charger is it doesn't actually make a ton of sense, unless you've got a monster battery pack or have like a crazy high C rate in which case your energy density is going to be poor. So it's kind of copper maybe. We think maybe 200 on a per clock. I also don't think about 350 kilowatts for a single car. That's really pretty you're going to frag the battery pack if you do that. There's no you cannot charge a high energy battery pack at that rate, unless it's a very high kilowatt hour battery pack. So something along the yes, I think, I don't know, like a couple of 100, 250 maybe? Yes. I mean, that's definitely sort of power level that we've discussed and explored. And some of it also comes down to an optimization around utility versus cost and trade offs in the car itself. You kind of hinted at that, Elon, but there is a trade off fundamentally between charge speed and essentially range or cost of battery. And we look at that pretty carefully. We understand the trade off and we could design cells in a pack that could charge it faster than 300 kilowatts, but it's not a very useful trade off to the customer. Yes. Let's go to understand the difference between energy and power even really. Energy is there and also energy is right, essentially much and then power is kind of like your peak acceleration basically, the rate which you consume energy. So really what it's more important to have long range than it is to have a super fast charge time. And you can sort of think about this in the devices that you use. Would you rather have a cell phone that lasted 2 hours, but had it could charge in 5 minutes or 10 minutes, let's say, but it only lasted 2 hours. Or if like a supplement lasts 2 days and maybe it takes an hour to charge. Thank you. Our next We'll keep going until I answer your questions while they're interested. Yes. I have a couple more. For the superchargers, I know you guys are not trying to profit off of Tesla owners with that infrastructure, but will you ever open that up to other automakers and try and generate revenue from that system? We've always said that this is not intended to be a walled garden and we're happy to support other automakers and let them use our supercharger stations. They would just need to pay a share of the costs proportionate to their vehicle usage and they would need to be able to accept our charge rate and our connector or at least have an adapter to our connector. So this is something we're very open to. But so far, none of the other carmakers have wanted to do this. But it's like not because of opposition from us. This is not a walled garden kind of make a moat bullshit. Okay. And maybe could you clarify what's the strategy? Like it seems like that would be a very strong moat to have this network you guys have been building globally for years. So why open it up and why is that not a moat? Sorry. Can you repeat the question? I'm just wondering why that isn't a moat because as a long term investor, I feel like the charging infrastructure you guys have built would take years and 1,000,000 of dollars for another brand to replicate. So I'm just curious about the strategic thinking behind opening that up versus keeping it closed. First of all, I think moats are lame. I mean, they're like nice and sort of quaint, vestigial way. But like your only defense against like invading armies is a moat, you will not last long. What matters is the pace of innovation. That is the fundamental determinant of competitiveness. And for any given company, if the rate of innovation, let's say, like our competitors, maybe they come out with something new every 6 years, We are maybe every 2 to 3 years. So if our innovation is, let's say, twice that of any given competitor, then it is simply or this is true of generally of companies in any industry. Whichever company has the highest rate of innovation, unless that company is actively killed by its competitors in some way that's nefarious or shoots itself in the foot, it will at some point exceed those competitors. Like this is obvious that this would occur with Amazon and Walmart because Walmart's rate of rate of innovation was negligible and Amazon's was very high. The outcome was obvious a long time ago. And in terms of the mega charger, I noticed you guys are going to be selling energy at a fixed price for those truck customers. So I'm wondering what the philosophy is there. Is it also you're going to operate that at cost and reduce that energy price? Or are you thinking of that as a revenue stream for the company? We haven't really talked about any of that and haven't finalized frankly any of that. We want to make sure that there's a very seamless and easy system to operate trucks wherever they need to go. And some customers may elect to work with us on Yes. I Yes. I mean, for sure, with commercial trucking, like a heavy duty semi, economics are fundamental to that situation. They're not making decisions based on aesthetics or consumer related things. Like we made our we are trying to make up semi kind of cool and sexy just because we think that that's a good thing to do, not because it affects the buying decision of our customers in a meaningful way. It doesn't really move the needle. I remember it was like laughable lawsuit recently from some company ironically called Nikola. It's like Nikola is suing Tesla, that's hilarious. Fate loves irony. And but they're like saying that's because of the way the trucks look, which is absurd. Nobody's buying a semi truck because of the way it looks or because it's got like a wraparound windshield or whatever, please. So, the economics are incredibly important. And so we have to make sure that the superchargers or mega charges, whatever we call them, or the trucks are set up in a way that you'd have very low cost electricity. One maybe slightly related point to that, that I think is super exciting about this is the potential to link up renewable energy generation at a very fixed and also very affordable cost to power future trucking fleets. Ultimately, that can give customers an incredibly deterministic cost per mile, that will not change with the price of petroleum over decades, which is really, really an interesting proposition for a trucking customer. And that's something that we're pretty excited about. I have one last one. It's really what I'm saying. For trucking companies, like if the cost of diesel goes up a few percent, just like destroys their business. And with the sort of mega charger situation, combining having basically a solar battery powered mega charger, we have constant costs and we know what they are. We bake them in. It's predictable. Yes, it's very predictable and lower cost per mile than a diesel truck. Fundamentally, it's like what is the cost per mile or kilometer of cargo and that drives the commercial trucking market. I mean, you have the obvious trucking in the world and so we would be victorious. Yes, super quick. Building on that, do you have any thoughts on how the trucking market could change or potentially grow if you guys are actually able to deliver on dramatic cost reduction, especially with things like platooning? I think it will take away quite a bit of revenue from railway because the reason rail is able to be competitive is that effectively just platooning with lots of rail cars and you need only a small crew to operate the train. However, trains don't go over trains don't go everywhere. So you have to like have a truck deliver things to the train rails spur and then picks up pick it up and then at the destination, the trucks got to pick it up from the rail spur over there. So you still have trucks plus train plus transfer. So I think platooning of trucks will quite dramatically affect the rail industry in a negative way. Okay. Last one, I promise. On Tesla Energy, I assume that you guys are basically supply constrained, not demand constrained on that side of the business. So I'm wondering how you're prioritizing residential versus utility scale? And in particular, how has this successful project in South Australia sort of changed the industry's perception of what batteries can do? Yes. I think it's had quite a profound effect. South Australia took a chance on doing the world's biggest battery, it's worked out really well. If you read the articles, it's worked out far beyond their expectations because the battery is able to respond at the millisecond level far faster than any hydrocarbon plant. And so its value in grid stabilization is much greater actually than even a gas turbine plant, which normally respond quite fast. So it's kind of like if you get on Tesla and you have that instant acceleration, it feels like you like have almost like a mind meld with the car. It's just like the car is you and that same rapid response is true of the battery pack. So the customers that we've the utilities that we've worked with thus far really love the battery pack and I feel confident that we'll be able to announce a deal at the gigawatt hour scale within a matter of months. So 1,000 megawatts megawatts for Zenergoygan gigawatts. Yes. Maybe just to the first part of your question it is absolutely accurate that we are still there is more than enough demand and we are still building out of our demand backlog and actually increasing it slightly. And we're trying to do our best to prioritize customers between residential, power wall and utility and commercial. I'd say our longer term strategy is to shift a little bit of our focus and really catch up on our Powerwall demand backlog, which is quite it's too long right now. We know people are waiting too long. So that's I think that's generally the direction we're trying to take that. But Model 3 has taken a lot of focus in the last few quarters and that trend is going to be reversing in the second half of the year. Awesome. Thank you guys so much. Really appreciate the time. Keep up thoughts on work. You are welcome. Thanks for your questions. Our next question comes from Phil Lebow with CNBC. Hi, Elon. A question on the Tef Semi. Can you give us some perspective in terms of how many reservations you guys have now and where you guys are in the plan for developing it and rolling out the first model? My apologies. Sorry, we're just discussing something internally. Could you repeat that question? With the Tesla Semi, how many reservations do you guys now have approximately? And where are you in the process as far as the development and the rollout of the first model in terms of timeline, when you guys expect that to happen, etcetera? I actually don't know how many reservations we have for semi. About 2,000. About 2,000. Okay. We haven't really tried to sell semi. Not like there's like an ongoing sales effort. So sales orders are for semi like opportunistic where the company is approaching us. It's not something we really think about much. Our focus is on the Model 3. We need to get that to above 5,000 a week at a good margin. We need to become a profitable company. That is a good criticism. That has been level of Tesla, an accurate one. It's high time we became profitable. And the truth is like you're not a real company until you are, frankly. So that's our focus right now. And we have got an awesome product roadmap. The Tesla Semi is one of those things. And I think we've got a really good idea for the Model Y is going to be amazing. I'm really excited about that. Tesla pickup is going to be great. So the product roadmap, I mean, we have like way more cool things than we know what to do. The idea is the idea generation priority is the ability to execute it. So we just need to stay focused and not divide our attention on too many products at one time. And a follow-up, given the fact that you're already packed the gills in Fremont, when will you make a decision regarding a second manufacturing facility? So that's probably later this year. It has to be later this year. So I'm not sure of the exact time, but I don't know, maybe next quarter, but not later than Q4 for Model Y. And then we also expect to announce the location of a Tesla Gigafactory in China soon. And will that second factory, when you announce it, will it be in North America or is that going to be in China? Well, I just said it's in China. So the Gigafactory is there, but the second manufacturing plant will be in China? Sorry. I mean, yes. So sorry. In the future, all Gigafactories will include vehicle production. So right now, we've got vehicle production and battery production like battery production and motor and power electronics and charger production are at Giga and we've got our pre event car factory, but future Giga factories will all incorporate vehicle production. Got it. Thank you. We're very appreciative of the fact that the government of China has announced that they will be allowing full ownership of manufacturing facilities in China, which let's express a word of appreciation to the Chinese government in that regard. I'm sure also Robin, is there anything that you'd like to say or anything? We are in good discussion with the government. So we'll announce something when we are back. Okay. So Robin Rain is here with me. Robin is managing worldwide sales for Tesla right now. He was born in recent Shanghai. But we will talk more about I think the next earnings call or next we'll have a lot more to say about that in the future. Our next question comes from James Albertyne with Consumer Edge. And if I can be brief, I wanted to ask, given the coverage that you've received as it relates to these high profile accidents, one of the things we like most about your company is you have the most miles tested and continue to test daily from an autopilot perspective. Can you give us any color from what you're seeing in your data as it relates to the confidence that your consumers have in the autopilot functionality, whether they've used it more or less frequently in their existing vehicles or whether they've opted to purchase the functionality more or less in lieu of these accidents? Because we're really trying to get a sense of consumer sort of the ability for the likelihood of consumers to adopt this technology over time. So this would be very helpful. Thanks. We do see a steady increase in the number of percentage of miles driven using auto pilot. So as we roll out more functionality, as we make it better, we see a steady increase. I think it's something for cars with Autopads, something on the order of a third of highway miles, maybe closer maybe a half in some cases are in some regions are on autopilot. But then of course, when there is like negative news in the press, then that dips and then I was like okay, this is not good because people are reading things in the press that cause them to use Autopilot less and then that makes it dangerous for our customers and that's not cool. That's why I get upset. And then we get accused of blaming the victim. I was like, look, we're not blaming the victim here, but it is important that people not be under the wrong impression. The statistics are unequivocal that motor pilots improve safety, no question. In fact, one thing I was going to mention, I was going to also mention is that we'll be publishing our safety statistics on a quarterly basis. Wonderful. So people know exactly what Autopilot safety is. Is it getting better or is it getting worse? And it's like one of the common misimpressions is that when there is a serious accident on autopilot, people for some reason think that or some of the articles think that it's because the driver thought the car was fully autonomous and wasn't and we somehow misled them into thinking it was fully autonomous. It is the opposite case. When there is a serious accident, it is almost always, in fact maybe always the case that it is an experienced user. And the issue is what more one is complacency, like we just get too used to it, that tends to be more of an issue. It's not a lack of understanding of what Autopilot can do. It's actually thinking they know more about Autopilot than they do, like quite a significant understanding of it. Just to clarify, so you've had 2 accidents spaced out pretty far. You've had dips during those periods when the accidents occurred. To clarify your comments, you are increasing you're seeing increasing usage and you've weathered those dips based on where we are today? That is correct. Wonderful. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ben Kallo with Baird. Hey, Elon. So I remember the Barron story. I don't know if it was fake news or not, what you hung up on about your battery costs. And I don't want to ask a mundane question, but I think it's important because one of your stakeholders are shareholders right now. And so far, we've had a couple of push outs in production. And is there a way that you can update us when you get to that 3,000 number or 4,000 number per week? I mean, you're active on Twitter. Can you just let us know because we're going to have a big back here and there's a lot of news flow out there that makes volatility into the stock. It makes it hard for people to own even though you have a lot of believers out there. And so even though we're being myopic right now, I think it's very important to get those kind of updates. And so that's I think that's my question. Can you give us an update when you get to 3,000 or 4,000 per week on the Model 3? Yes. Actually, what's Tesla is such a leaky server of information that I think the news will leak pretty quickly. And also people track registrations very closely. So at most, any information that we provide would be a week or 2 in advance of what will become public knowledge just due to vehicle registrations and shipments that attract very carefully. So the really the part is like people get too focused on like what's happening in the space of a few weeks or a few months. This is it's an old maxim of investing. You should not be focused on short term things, you should be focused on long term things. And we have no interest in satisfying the desires of day traders. I couldn't care less. Please sell our stock and don't buy it. I completely understand your frustration, and I'm frustrated too on how myopic we are right now. They also say that great years are made out of quarters and great decades are made out of years. So everyone's short term focus in some ways and volatility has a way of shaking people out, even that are strong and want to be there. That's okay. And anything you can do to help in the near term on that, I think it's helpful for the stuff. That's it. I think that if people are concerned about volatility, they should definitely not buy our stock. I am not here to convince you to buy our stock. Do not buy it if volatility is scary. There you go. Okay. And let's go to our last question now. Thank you. Our last question comes from Alex Potter with Piper Jaffray. Hi, guys. Thanks a lot. I'm not sure if this is going to be a hard question to answer. You mentioned Model 3 market share versus the 3 Series and others in that segment. To what extent do you think Model 3 is, I guess, changing the denominator, making that segment larger as a class versus what it used to be? I think it will probably increase the total number of sedans purchased. Yes, I think so. So you think you're pulling ex Accord buyers and Camry buyers into that class? Yes, we know it's because of the trade ins. So we see quite a wide range of cars including just like a few out of trading in the cars. They are not necessarily owners of a C Class or an Audi A 4 or 3 Series. We saw signs of it even with Model S. So with Model 3, it's going to be even more prominent. Yes, exactly. And I think also once we get to like the shared autonomy, ride hailing thing, which could be as soon as the end of next year, but probably that's where it's technically ready, but then not long after that, I would expect some jurisdictions to give regulatory approval. The effective cost of ownership of a Model 3 or Tesla crops dramatically because you can share that car with others. Okay, very interesting. Last one, you mentioned earlier you think the Model Y production is going to be a true sort of production revolution. If you had to do the Model 3 over again, there are some things that you would change and you hope to incorporate those learnings into the Model Y. What specifically would you do? What specifically should you plan to do? Well, I think let's save that for another time. We'll talk about that when we unveil the Model Y. But it's really going to be dramatically better. The design and production system, I think really will be next level. Okay. So we look forward to it. Yes. Sounds good. Thank you. All right. Thanks a lot. Thanks, everyone. Appreciate the good questions. Okay. This is unfortunately all the time we have. So thank you very much and speak to you next quarter. Thank you very much and goodbye. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may all disconnect and have a wonderful day.