Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q4 2022 Textron earnings release conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. If you have a question, please press one, then zero. Once again, for questions, please press one, then zero. If you should require assistance on the call, please press star then zero. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Vice President, Investor Relations, Mr. Eric Salander. Please go ahead.
Thanks, Greg. Good morning, everyone. Before we begin, I'd like to mention we will be discussing future estimates and expectations during our call today. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risk factors, which are detailed in our SEC filings and also in today's press release. On the call today, we have Scott Donnelly, Textron's Chairman and CEO, and Frank Connor, our Chief Financial Officer. Our earnings call presentation can be found in the investor relations section of our website. Revenues in the quarter were $3.6 billion, up from $3.3 billion in last year's Q4. Segment profit in the quarter was $317 million, up $7 million from the Q4 of 2021. During this year's Q4, we reported income from continuing operations of $1.07 per share.
Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions totaled $368 million in the quarter, up $70 million from last year's Q4. For the full year, revenues were $12.9 billion, up $487 million from last year. In 2022, segment profit was $1.2 billion, up $89 million from 2021. Income from continuing operations was $4.01 per share compared to $3.30 in 2021. Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions was $1.2 billion, up $29 million from 2021. I'll turn the call over to Scott.
Thanks, Eric. Good morning, everyone. Our business closed out the year with another strong quarter. In the quarter, Aviation grew revenue and segment profit, reflecting higher aircraft deliveries, increased aftermarket volume, and strong pricing net of inflation as compared to last year's Q4. In the quarter, we continued to see solid order flow, customer demand across our aircraft product portfolio, ending the year with $6.4 billion of backlog. For the year, we delivered 178 jets, up from 167 last year, and 146 commercial turboprops, up from 125 in 2021. Textron Aviation Defense delivered 10 T-6 aircraft for the year, up from five a year ago. Throughout 2022, strong aircraft utilization within the Textron Aviation product portfolio resulted in a 16% growth in aftermarket revenues.
At Bell, as expected, revenues were down slightly in the quarter on lower military revenue, reflecting the continued wind down of the H-1 program, partially offset by higher commercial revenues. In December, U.S. Army announced that Bell's V-280 Valor was selected as the winner of the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft program competition. This award is a testament to the hard work of the Bell team that designed, built, and flew the V-280 prototype over the last 10 years in support of this win. The initial FAR contract award of up to $1.3 billion over the first 19 months, with an initial funding of $232 million for engineering and manufacturing development-related activity, is currently on hold pending the outcome of a protest that was filed at year-end by the competing vendor.
On the commercial side of Bell, we delivered 179 helicopters in 2022, up from 156 in 2021. Moving to Textron Systems, revenues were essentially flat with last year's Q4. During the Q4, Systems was awarded another anti-vehicle munition contract from the U.S. Army. The award is valued at $162 million over a 5-year period of performance. In December, Systems announced the delivery of the Cottonmouth to the U.S. Marine Corps for testing through 2023. This vehicle was purpose-built for the Marine's Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle program. Also in the quarter, Systems delivered the 6th Ship-to-Shore Connector to the U.S. Navy after its successful completion of its acceptance trials. Moving to industrial, we saw higher revenue in the quarter, driven by higher volume at both Kautex and Specialized Vehicles and favorable pricing, principally of Specialized Vehicles.
Moving to aviation, we delivered six Velis Electro aircraft in the Q4, including the first unit into Canada. For the year, Pipistrel delivered 61 aircraft following the completion of the acquisition in April 2022. In summary, we saw strong demand across our commercial product lines, and the teams executed well despite supply chain and labor constraints. At Aviation, the team executed very well with a full-year segment profit margin of 11.5%. It was above the high end of our original guidance range. Aviation's backlog grew 55% to $6.4 billion at year-end on strong order activity and customer demand. On the new product front, we received FAA certification for the Cessna SkyCourier and delivered six units to our launch customer, FedEx, during 2022.
At Textron Aviation Defense, the light attack AT-6 Wolverine achieved military type certification from the U.S. Air Force, enabling the first international sale of eight aircraft. At Bell, the December 20th, 2022 FLRAA contract award has solidified the long-term outlook for the segment and should provide an increased revenue stream that we expect will drive growth well into the future. On FARA, the 360 Invictus is nearly complete, and we expect first flight in 2023, pending delivery of the ITEP engine. At Textron Systems, we advanced our weapons programs with the award of our anti-vehicle munitions programs, continued work on the Robotic Combat Vehicle and armed reconnaissance vehicle development programs. Systems also obtained airworthiness certifications for four additional F1s at ATAC, bringing the total operational F1 fleet to 23 aircraft in support of increased demand across U.S. military tactical air programs.
At Textron Specialized Vehicles, the company continued its leadership in the development and production of zero-emission golf vehicles, turf maintenance equipment, and ground support equipment markets. At Kautex in 2022, we were awarded contracts on 14 hybrid electric vehicle programs for our fuel system. At Aviation, the Pipistrel Velis Electro continued to receive certifications from around the world and is now certified in more than 30 countries. Looking to 2023, at Aviation, we are projecting growth driven by increased deliveries across all product lines and higher aftermarket volume. At Bell, we're projecting revenue growth in 2023 on higher military revenues from the FLRAA program and higher commercial revenues. At Systems, we're expecting mid-single-digit revenue growth across our businesses. At Industrial, we're expecting revenue growth at Specialized Vehicles and Kautex.
At eAviation, we plan to continue investments in the development of technologies and products supporting sustainable flight solutions for unmanned cargo, next-generation electric trainers, eVTOLs, and general aviation. With this overall back-backdrop, we're projecting revenues of about $14 billion for Textron's 2023 financial guidance, projecting adjusted EPS in the range of $5 to $5.20. Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions is expected to be in a range of $900 million to $1 billion. With that, I'll turn the call over to Frank.
Thanks, Scott, good morning, everyone. Let's review how each of the segments contributed, starting with Textron Aviation. Revenues at Textron Aviation of $1.6 billion were up $223 million from a year ago, reflecting higher jet and defense volume and higher pricing. Segment profit was $169 million in the Q4, up $32 million from last year's Q4 due to favorable pricing, net of inflation of $29 million and higher volume and mix, partially offset by an unfavorable impact from performance. Performance includes unfavorable manufacturing performance, largely related to inefficiencies from supply chain disruptions and increased staffing associated with higher production, partially offset by lower selling and administrative costs. Backlog in the segment ended the quarter at $6.4 billion.
Moving to Bell, revenues were $816 million, down $42 million from last year, reflecting lower military revenues, partially offset by higher commercial revenues. Segment profit was $71 million. Of $71 million was down $17 million from a year ago, primarily reflecting lower military volume and mix, partially offset by a favorable impact from performance. Backlog in the segment ended the quarter at $4.8 billion. At Textron Systems, revenues were $314 million, up $1 million from last year's Q4. Segment profit of $40 million was down $5 million from a year ago. Backlog in the segment ended the quarter at $2.1 billion.
Industrial revenues were $907 million, up $126 million from last year, reflecting higher end volume and mix of $95 million and a $59 million favorable impact from pricely-pricing, largely at Specialized Vehicles product line, partially offset by an unfavorable impact of $28 million from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Segment profit of $42 million was up $4 million from the Q4 of 2021, primarily due to higher volume and mix, partially offset by an unfavorable impact from performance. Textron eAviation segment revenues were $6 million, and segment loss was $10 million in the Q4 of 2022, which reflected the operating results of Pipistrel, along with research and development costs for initiatives related to the development of sustainable aviation solutions. Finance segment revenues were $11 million, and profit was $5 million.
Moving below segment profit, corporate expenses were $43 million in the Q4. Interest expense net for the manufacturing group was $17 million. Our manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions was $368 million in the quarter. For the year, manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions totaled $1.2 billion, up $29 million from the prior year, despite higher cash tax payments of $284 million in 2022 related to the R&D tax law change. In the quarter, we repurchased approximately 3.3 million shares, returning $228 million in cash to shareholders. For the full year, we repurchased approximately 13.1 million shares, returning $867 million in cash to shareholders. Beginning in the Q1 of 2023, we'll change how we measure our segment results.
Going forward, we will exclude from segment profit the LIFO inventory provision, intangible asset amortization, and the non-service component of pension and post-retirement income or expense. These items will be separately reported on the income statement below segment profit. We believe these changes will provide a more consistent method of measuring and evaluating business performance across our segments while also aligning our reporting results more consistently with other companies within our industry. On slides 15 and 16 in the investor presentation posted to our website, you will find prior year results reflecting the recast of segment profit. Also effective with the Q1 of 2023 results, we will report earnings per share on an adjusted basis that excludes the LIFO inventory provision and intangible asset amortization, both non-cash items.
Turning now to our 2023 outlook on slide 9, we're expecting adjusted earnings per share to be in a range of $5.00-$5.20 per share. We're also expecting manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions to be about $900 million-$1 billion. Moving to segment outlook on slide 11 and beginning with Textron Aviation, we're expecting revenues of about $5.7 billion. Segment margin is expected to be in a range of approximately 12%-13%. Looking to Bell, we expect revenues of about $3.3 billion.
We're forecasting a margin in a range of 8.25%-9.25%. At Textron Systems, we're estimating revenues of about $1.25 billion, with a margin in a range of about 10.75%-11.75%. At Industrial, we're expecting segment revenues of about $3.6 billion and margin to be in a range of about 5%-6%. At Textron eAviation, we expect revenues of $45 million and a segment loss of $65 million, largely reflecting our continued investments in sustainable aviation solutions. Lastly, at Finance, we're forecasting profit of about $15 million. Looking at slide 12, we're projecting about $150 million of corporate expense.
We're also projecting about $90 million of net interest expense, $130 million of LIFO inventory provision, $35 million of intangible asset amortization, and $235 million of non-service pension income. We expect a full year effective tax rate of approximately 17.5%. Turning to slide 13. R&D is expected to be about $585 million, down from $601 million last year. We're estimating CapEx will be about $425 million, up from $354 million in 2022. Our outlook assumes an average share count of about 205 million shares in 2023. That concludes our prepared remarks. Greg, you can open the line for questions.
Okay. Once again, if you have a question, please press one then zero. Your first question comes from the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
You've definitely had a busy quarter between FLRAA, so congratulations on that. I think you threw in an Aerojet bid and Pipistrel as well. I wanted to focus on aviation margins. In Q4, I think you ended at 10.7%, potentially lower, including the recasting for LIFO. How do we think about the walk to the 12.5% margins in 2023?
Well, I think she'll first of all, the, you know, the quarter we knew that we were gonna have, you know, some headwind with supply chain, and obviously, we brought a lot of new people on board, which is a good thing, but had a lot of impacts, you know, just getting all those folks on and training and those kinds of interruptions. In the quarter, we did take, you know, a lot of those unusual impacts right to expense in the quarter rather than putting it in inventory. We did take a hit on that. LIFO was still in there, obviously, in that reported number. Obviously, on a recast basis going forward, that won't be there.
I think when we think about, you know, what happens as we go into 2023, obviously, you're gonna not have the LIFO in there. I think we're gonna see Again, we're guiding probably almost a half a billion dollars of higher revenue, and, you know, that converts at good margins. I think, you know, we're pretty bullish on our ability to drive higher margins as we go through 2023.
Maybe just as a follow-up to that longer term, like, how do you think about peak trough margins in aviation? Is it just steady as it goes from here? Can it just be a 20% incremental margin business?
As you know, Sheila, based on analyst pressures, we've been striving to get above 10% margins in the aviation business. And, we feel pretty good about that. Look, I think it's gonna be very much volume driven. You guys know, we tend to convert somewhere in that 20%-25% range. I expect we can continue that as we go forward. Certainly, we're guiding that in our conversion for 2023. You know, as we go beyond that, we'll just have to, you know, see where the market is. You know, the good news is, demand has remained strong. The Q4 demand remained strong. We had good bookings in a Q4. Environment, I think we feel pretty good about.
You know, in terms of what margins do on a go-forward basis, I think we kinda remain in that neighborhood of expecting sort of a 20%, 25% conversion on our revenue growth.
Great. Thank you.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of David Strauss from Barclays. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning.
Good morning, David.
Scott, could you just talk through the forecasted Bell? up revenue, down margins, decent amount. You mentioned it includes FLRA. What exactly is your assumption for FLRA? Does that assume you win it post the protest? Just if you get out there.
Sure, David, it does. The protest period ends at the first week of April. We've baked that into our estimates, assuming that will be resolved, you know, by that period of time. Obviously, you know, the dynamics in terms of margin is that we, you know, we'll continue to see a decline on the military revenue side. There'll be some offset on the commercial revenue side. We've had a good year in terms of bookings and expect to see nice growth on the commercial side. Obviously, we'll have three-quarters of the FLRAA program coming in, which is good, but that is, you know, a lower margin, you know, business. I mean, EMD programs tend to be lower margin, and that's what we've forecast in our guide for you for 2023.
Scott, can you say specifically how much revenue is in there for FLRAA, and how would we expect to ramp beyond 2023 in terms of revenue?
No, we're not gonna break out the specifics of the, you know, individual programs. I think, you know, clearly, it will ramp, you know, as we go into 24, 25. Obviously, I think probably for quite some time. I mean, I think this program will be a terrific, you know, boom for the business. It's gonna start out, obviously, with a lot of the CMD, which as we said is great volume and good revenue, but not a whole lot of margin. Obviously we'll expect to see it, you know, continue to grow and turn into better margins as you get into production programs and foreign military sales and, you know, all the things that we would expect will come along with a successful FARA program.
Okay. Last one on the Aero supply chain, can you just update us there? You know, your deliveries, I think, you know, came in a fair amount later for the full year than we were originally anticipating at the beginning of the year. How many additional deliveries could you have done this year if you didn't have, you know, supply chain bottlenecks? Thanks.
Well, I don't, I don't know if we'll go into express numbers, David, but look, we've been kind of forecasting here since the mid part of the year that we expected we would end up a few hundred million dollars light versus our initial guide, based on the fact that we continue to see supply chain challenges and some labor issues. I think labor has certainly improved through the balance of the year, although a lot of that's new folks and training, and it has an efficiency impact, but at least we're making some progress on that front. I think we've had, you know, a number of suppliers that were challenged are getting better, but you always have a couple out there that are still struggling. You know, that was a... You know, we kind of anticipated that in the back half of the year.
That's why we kind of tried to provide some color that we expected this to be a few hundred million off of our guide. I think that, you know, we've taken that into consideration, so as we think about next year's, you know, guide for 2023, there are still gonna be supply chain challenges all along the way, we think we've taken that into proper consideration in terms of the 2023 guide.
Thanks very much.
Your next question comes from the line of Robert Stallard from Vertical Research. Please go ahead.
Thanks so much. Good morning.
Hi, Robert.
I'll start with Frank. I was wondering if you could give us some sort of walk on the manufacturing cash flow and why you expect it to modestly decline in 2023?
Yeah. It's just, it's a reflection of an expectation that we'll continue to see good performance from a working capital standpoint. We do have the, you know, continuation of higher cash taxes associated with the R&D tax credit change. Also we're just expecting lower a slightly lower V in deposit activity from commercial volume. We're kind of framing it in terms of kind of 1-to-1 book-to-bill type expectation as it relates to deposit activity. That, you know, kind of has a little bit of a headwind on cash relative to where we have been.
Okay. Maybe one for Scott. There's been a lot of commentary roundabout in the business jet industry about some of the lead indicators starting to slow. Have you seen any impact of, say, activity leveling off or used inventory increasing, having any impact on order activity for you?
No, we haven't seen that, Robert. I mean, I think our order rate in the Q4 was consistent with the Q3. It remains, you know, quite healthy. You know, I think when people look at some of these, you know, sort of leading indicators, you know, like it's hard to keep track of what. When you see a little bit of an increase in used available for sale, you know, what kind of aircraft are those? What are their vintages? You know, we think, you know, obviously the market's been very strong, so people are looking to put some aircraft on the market. They're still very low level, so we're not seeing that, you know, the knock-on effect into the market for new aircraft.
We haven't seen a material change in the level of activity that's going out there in terms of order activity. I mean, there's lots of people writing reports. It's frankly hard to understand sometimes. There's so many comparisons of flying by region, by size of aircraft, compared to 2019, compared to last quarter, compared to 2022. It's you know. It's in the round, so we haven't seen any of that have a meaningful impact on order activity.
That's great. Thanks so much.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Peter Arment from Baird. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks. Good morning, Scott and Frank.
Sure.
Scott, just circling back on David's question regarding the supply chain and maybe tacking in inflation. It sounds like, you know, I mean but it sounds like things are holding in there, or are they getting a little better? Then just also could you maybe talk a little bit how you're passing on any higher input costs right now?
As on the supply chain side, Peter, I think, you know, we have some suppliers where we've had challenges, and we clearly see them getting healthy and, and getting better. You know, we have other areas where suppliers are still struggling. I mean, I don't wanna go into too much detail, but it's very specific components, you know, very specific suppliers. Obviously we're working with them and, and trying to get them healthy and do a better job in terms of getting parts into the factory. Obviously from our standpoint, we do lots of out of sequence work and swapping parts around. We'd like to stop doing that. It's a efficiency hit to us. Our guys have to work through every day. It's, you know, I think it's about the same, right?
As I said, there's some suppliers that are getting better. Then you got one that's just, you know, having a hard time catching up. I don't know that we're seeing a lot of new suppliers coming in to say, "Hey, I got a big problem." We have a couple that are, you know, we've been struggling all year, and we're trying to get them back on schedule. They're working at it, but they're just not quite there yet. Again, we've factored that into how we think, you know, 2023 will play out. In terms of the pricing side of things, Peter, you know, we continue to get price, you know, net of inflation. We're very focused on that. You know, as these input costs, you know, increase, we have to drive price to get that back.
I think the guys are doing a pretty good job of that.
Just as a quick follow-up on Textron Systems, I mean, just could you talk a little bit both the armed reconnaissance vehicle and defense, you know, kind of looking funding pretty robust as we go forward. You know, how are you looking at, you know, we're showing modest growth for Textron Systems this year, but how do you think longer term?
Well, look, I think when we look at the FYDP numbers, they, they seem fine to us. When you look at what came through on the omnibus in terms of the, this current fiscal year's budget, you know, was in line with our expectations. I think, you know, I think we're fine. The growth, the good news at, at Textron Systems is it's really kind of across almost all the product lines. It's not just one particular thing. Obviously, we've had some new wins, you know, in the munition side, which is great. That's put that business back to growth. The Sentinel program continues to do well. Our Ship-to-Shore, as I said, we've made deliveries. You know, we'll start negotiating the next, you know, production buy here shortly, but we'll finish the DD&C this year and start production deliveries.
The ATAC business has had nice growth. Our electronics business has had nice growth. It really is, you know, kind of across all of the businesses within Textron Systems, and the omnibus, you know, budget that was appropriated is consistent with obviously what we're guiding to you guys.
Appreciate the color. Thanks. Thanks, Scott.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Pete Skibitski from Alembic Global. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, guys.
Good morning.
Hey, Scott, you know, fair to say, I think, you know, some of your businesses have a cyclical component to them. I'm just wondering, I'm sure you guys see, I think the consensus out there for the macro guys is that we'll have some sort of mild recession this year, maybe later this year. As you guys see that, and whether you agree with it or not, do you know, is it prudent for you to maybe even kind of slow the top line growth in those type of businesses? You know, maybe like Citation, maybe TSB, to kind of protect your margins and not overhire. Are you guys thinking about your businesses that way or not necessarily, you know, right now?
Oh, we absolutely look at that, Peter. I mean, as I said, there's cyclicality in almost every business, right? Some have more than others. Those that we think are gonna be, you know, more recession sensitive, we've kind of factored in thinking we'll have a mild recession. I don't think it's gonna be dramatic. We're certainly not thinking about something in the scope of back in the 2009, 2010 kind of timeframe. I don't think we have an economic, you know, situation that's gonna lead to something like that. I'd say that, you know, look, I think that when you look back at previous, you know, modest recessions, the area that has always, you know, impacted us the most difficult has been a slowdown in the aviation business.
I think we're in a very different place than we've been in those previous sessions because we have a pretty significant backlog. You know, I think that, you know, the nature of that will allow us to, you know, even if you were to see a slowdown in bookings, which is entirely possible. I would expect it if you really go into a modest recession. You know, you'll see a slowdown in booking, but you've got, you know, almost 2 years of backlog sitting there that you'll continue, you know, to execute on, and I think that'll help you ride through it. We haven't, you know, we haven't had that for a bunch of years, Peter, as you know.
I think that it's, you know, it's one that would translate to a slowdown in bookings, but not something that would, you know, slow us down in terms of our revenue and, and margin generation.
Okay. That's fair. Just one last one for me. Scott, are you guys any closer to signing that AH-1 deal with Nigeria?
The, well, I mean, it's in the kind of government contracting process, right? That ends up being, you know, because of the FMS nature of that would be signed, you know, between ourselves and the U.S. government. As you know, Peter, that can take a little while.
Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of George Shapiro from Shapiro Research. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Frank, if you could just fill in a couple of numbers. How much was aftermarket up in the quarter?
At Aviation, aftermarket as a % of, the sales was 27%, so you can kinda do the V, based on that. It was 11%.
16% for the year.
Yeah.
I think it was.
Yeah
... 10% in the quarter.
Yeah, and aftermarket was 33% of total sales for the year at Aviation.
Okay. Scott, you didn't specifically mention, but I assume you're looking at deliveries, based on the revenue forecast for 2023, somewhere 200-205 deliveries. Is that fair?
Yeah, it's gonna be in that neighborhood, George. That, you know, we've had a lot of dialogue, I think, about when you back to 2019, and obviously the mix of aircraft is quite different, right? I mean, we're certainly heavier on the super mids and the mids than we would have been a few years ago. That's, if you look at our revenue guide, it's probably gonna be somewhere around that 200 aircraft.
Scott, if I looked at the Q4, and even if I added back the $16 million that you mentioned for supply chain issues, the margin was still weaker than the last couple of quarters. What else was going on there?
Well, I know we're the 16, the inefficiencies that we, you know, took through and YFO, which was around probably about $10 million or something impact is largely what drove us to the margin rates that we reported.
Okay. Very good. That's it for me. Thanks.
Okay. Thanks, George.
Your next question comes from the line of Noah Poponak from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning, everyone.
Good morning.
Good morning.
Scott, you've alluded to it, but, you know, your backlog is several multiples of what it was just a few years ago, and the production is not. What's the, you know, average wait time at this point? How are you thinking about managing how long, you know, you're making customers wait for an airplane?
Look, you know, I mean, it does vary from model to model, right? When you look at the Longitudes and Latitudes, the larger aircraft in the family, we think those should be out a couple of years. That's generally, you know, where they are. When you get into some of the smaller, you know, aircraft, those tend to be a, you know, a shorter cycle, order deliveries. You know, again, those probably should be in that 12-18 month kind of window. When we think about production volumes and what we're laying into our forecast, which is, you know, that drives what our sales team has in terms of, you know, available, you know, slots and time frames. That's kind of how we're managing it.
Okay. How does pricing that's entering the backlog now compare to pricing that's hitting the P&L now in the aviation jet business?
It's better.
Is the gap increasing or stable?
I'm not sure. I know we don't measure a gap. You mean price net of inflation? Is that?
I guess what I'm wondering is, you know, I know you've been taking price as the market's been stronger. Was there a period of time as the market was strengthening where you were not taking as much price to allow the backlog to extend first before you now take more price?
No.
Is that the strategy, or has it been pretty consistent for the last few years?
It's been pretty consistent. Look, the pricing is, you know, obviously demand is strong, right, which is very helpful from a pricing standpoint. You know, our opinion, this market's been mispriced for a long time. You know, I mean, this is a business which, as you guys know, it's a lot of R&D. It's expensive to develop these things and get them through certifications, and, you know, you need to have fair pricing to generate these kind of margins. We've always believed this business had to be back as a double-digit profit margin business, and we've been driving price to make sure that that's the case.
Okay. What would be a credible protest case on FLRAA from your competition?
Don't think there would be one.
Okay. Thank you.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Ron Epstein from Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Hey. Good morning, guys. Just a quick one. Can you help me think through this LIFO adjustment you guys are making? I mean, isn't it sort of unfair to not include inflation in your costs? Isn't that sort of like-
Well, yeah. Ron, that's a good question. Look, just to make sure we understand the LIFO. Actual inflation is still in the segments. That's very much a cash impact. It remains in the segment. The only thing we're taking out of the segment is this LIFO provisioning, right? LIFO accounting, which, again, I'm just a simple engineer, Ron, but to, you know, the LIFO provisioning phenomenon is that I've bought parts at one price, and now I have a new contract with a supplier. I have a higher price for that part. As soon as that first part shows up, the LIFO provision is basically taking the actual price I paid for those other parts and raising them up to the price of that new part. It's an accounting provisioning process. It's not an actual cost.
When I get to where that higher dollar part gets consumed by an aircraft, that's gonna be in my cost. You know, where that real inflation is in the segment, it is cash, and it is in performance. It's only that provisioning of that, the nature of this Last In, First Out accounting that is what we're pulling out of the segment.
I guess another way to frame the question, though, is if we were to look at your margins pro forma'd back to GAAP for 2023, what would they be if you didn't do that adjustment?
Well, you'll have that full disclosure, right? You'll see that LIFO number.
You'll see the total LIFO.
Right.
Ron, no one else in our space is on LIFO. We're on LIFO for accounting. You need to conform that between tax and accounting. We, we derive a benefit from a tax standpoint in an inflationary environment by essentially accelerating those costs for book and tax purposes. As Scott said, it's not a true economic cost. We have basically hung up about $600 million of effectively LIFO provision on our balance sheet that was profit never realized because of this accounting that is not consistent with everyone else in the space.
Got it.
As inflation has accelerated here and LIFO has become a bigger number, we felt it was important to highlight that and certainly from a segment performance, take it out of the segment performance because it is not a true economic cost to the business. It is essentially a function of the accounting treatment that we have.
Right.
That inflation, that LIFO inflation will never turn into true economic cost in the business.
Ron, this has been an issue. We've always been on LIFO. Textron has always been on LIFO. In a non-inflationary environment, it's always been a bit of a drive. It's a small number. It's not been an issue, but with an inflationary environment, all of a sudden, you have these big noneconomic, you know, bookings. Again, as Frank said, other companies, everybody else in our space does FIFO accounting instead of LIFO accounting. You know, we get a lot of questions from investors about what are these differences. I think taking this out. You know, makes sense. Look, the reality is we don't manage the business that way, right?
I mean, when we sit down with the business, when we're doing our plans, when we're managing, when we do our operating calls that, you know, life, it's not something they control, right? It's not economic. That's not how we manage the businesses, right? We don't look at that. It makes sense to also not, you know, report that in that segment since that's not how we manage these guys either. They don't control that LIFO. They do control, and they do get held accountable for actual real inflation on those, on those higher part caps, right? That's. You know, we're not taking anything operational out of the segment, but managing it on what they control and the real financial impact.
Got it. Got it. Okay. Thank you.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Cai von Rumohr from Cowen. Please go ahead.
Yes, thanks so much for taking the question. As Sheila mentioned, you know, allegedly, you guys went after AJRD. You did buy Pipistrel. You've won FLRAA. It looks like, you know, your business is becoming more A&D. If we kinda look at valuations across, you know, the space, it looks like valuations tend to be higher for pure plays. Either you're doing aerospace or you're doing air conditioning, whatever. As you think of your business, Scott, are you thinking of any strategic initiatives? At one point, I think you considered spinning off Kautex. How are you thinking about that now?
Well, look, Cai, I don't think we're gonna talk about portfolio, you know, shaping or changes as part of the earnings call. It's something we're always looking at, I think we'll leave it at that.
Okay. Great. Can you give us any help on the, you know, I don't know, do... But, you know, what Lockheed's, what the case Lockheed is making as to, you know, why they're protesting? Certainly on paper it looks like your vehicle is very substantially better than theirs.
Well, look, I mean, obviously, the, you know, the, that process is going on between, you know, the Army and Lockheed, so we probably can't comment too much. I guess I would just say that this is, as you all know, this process has been going on for a decade, right? There's been, you know, an enormous amount of work between, you know, both suppliers and the Army from design, development, test, prototype, flight. You know, it's been an unbelievably robust process, and so I don't. It's hard for me to understand what flaw, you know, would have been in the process. It's kind of inconceivable to me, but, you know, we'll leave that to the Army and Lockheed. Needless to say, we think they made the right choice.
I'm proud of what our team did, and we're excited to get this thing behind us and get on with the program, as I'm sure the Army is.
Terrific. The last one is cash deployment. I mean, you've got good cash flow, even though down year-over-year. You've got a good balance sheet. You've basically been heavily focused on share repurchase. I mean, really a lot of leverage there. You know, you also bought Pipistrel. As you think about where the cash is going, maybe give us some thoughts about, you know, M&A versus share repurchase, dividends, all of that.
Well, look, I mean, we always look at opportunities that are out there, Cai, and I would say relative to your earlier question, comment, you know, yes, we would view our focus in the world to be within the A&D space in terms of most of our capital deployment. Pipistrel's turned out to be a great little business, brought some great technology into the company and is, you know, now kind of important to us in terms of the future of sustainable flight. You know, if opportunities like that come along, then that's great. We've done some other smaller deals, again, in the A&D space. We would continue to look at that. Our principal deployment of our capital has been, you know, for the last number of years in the share buyback. We've been doing kind of 5%, 6%.
You know, we did another, you know, 5%, 6% this past year, and I would expect that's probably the track we're on in 2023 as well.
Thank you very much.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Scott, for the demand environment for aviation, can you give us an update in terms of the customer profile that you're seeing that are placing these aircraft orders? Are they corporates, individuals, fractionals? Are they gearing more for growth, replacement, or are they new buyers? Any additional context would be helpful in understanding the demand environment.
Sure. We haven't seen much of a change. You know, it continues to be that same mix. There's still new buyers coming into the marketplace. fractional is certainly strong. There's a lot of buyers on the fractional side. It's a particularly attractive place, I think, for new people to go, right? It's, you know, it's not, you know, easy to necessarily know how to own this asset. The fractionals provide a great option for people that wanna get in. that's doing well, but we still see robust whole aircraft sales. It's, you know, a mix of public companies, private companies, family-held companies. it really is kind of our usual customer base, I would say. It remains also kind of the same as we've seen around, you know, jets largely being driven by the North American market.
You know, probably 70-30 to 80-20 in that range, which is normal. Turboprops are more robust internationally. Again, we see, you know, stronger activity, again, like 60% plus international, you know, versus domestic on King Air, for instance. You know, the, the trend in terms of that, you know, who is that customer is kind of our traditional, buyers.
Great. Thanks for the color. Maybe following up on the supply chain issues that you mentioned, I mean, for some of these suppliers that continue to struggle for a few years now, what's the long-term solution? What can you do to mitigate their problems so you can actually deliver on the strong demand for biz jets? Are there other solutions like you need to vertically integrate your supply chain or anything like that to alleviate some of the pressure? What other actions can you take?
That's a good question. Look, it's a mix, right? I mean, in some cases we have some, you know, smaller suppliers and technologies where they basically kind of were us, and we did acquire them and integrated them as part of our business. You know, we have a good track record of doing that in the past around some critical areas. Interiors, we did. That's been a home run for us. You know, we just did a deal this past year in the actuation space. Again, a very unique aerospace technology. Most of the volume was ours. It's a critical supplier and a critical technology for us in the future. You know, these aren't big numbers, but it was a great acquisition, and so far it's working out really, really well for us.
It's helped to get us back on track. There's always gonna be some guys out there, you know, that are suppliers where it's, you know, we're a small percentage of their sales. It's very capital intensive. It's a technology that, you know, doesn't make sense for us to vertically integrate that. In those cases, we just, you know, keep working with those folks. I think those suppliers are all trying to get back up to speed. Obviously, it's a good business for them. You know, I'd say, you know, look, we don't have suppliers that I'm aware of that are obstinate or don't wanna perform.
You know, it's a matter of, you know, them getting the resources back in place and sub-tier suppliers getting in place and, you know, those are folks that just, you know, take a fair bit of work, but I think they will get there. Again, we've seen some of them have already recovered, you know, but there's still a couple problem children out there that are working on getting there.
Great. Thanks, Scott.
Sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Seth Seifman from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Hey, thanks very much, and good morning. I'll just stick to one here. Kind of a follow-up on the last question Kristine asked. I think from a mix perspective, you know, while the deliveries in total are still down from 2019, I think the deliveries to NetJets are probably higher. So as you think about delivery growth from here, you know, do you think about the incremental growth coming, you know, more with that top customer or, you know, more, you know, kind of diversifying the mix a little bit more? Then I'd also imagine that the, that like the order for the, for 200 Latitudes that NetJets has probably coming to a conclusion pretty soon.
you know, whether you think about how you think about expectations for the next slug of Latitudes from them.
First of all, I don't know in a % of sales back to 2019 what it was on fractional versus today. I think fractional, you know, when you think about diversification, the sale of a fractional aircraft is a more diversified sale, frankly, than a single jet. Remember that this is not a concentration of, you know, a buyer in NetJets. Remember, NetJets is out there selling that aircraft to 8 or so people, right? Every sale that we make to NetJets is a sale from NetJets to, you know, a whole bunch of different customers. It's quite diversified. You know, I don't expect NetJets or any fractional for that matter to track wildly different than the overall market demand, right?
If the market is strong and people are wanting to fly private, you're gonna see this mix of people that choose, you know, to do it through a fractional, which is actually a lot more people because, again, they're buying a fraction of an aircraft, not a whole aircraft. When I look at our mix, I think of the mix associated with the NetJets business as being very good mix, right? That's a very diversified sale. It's a very diversified, you know, market, and that's, you know, kinda that's what they do every day, right? They're out working and talking to, you know, lots and lots of customers in a, in a broad range of, you know, customer base for selling that fraction of an aircraft.
Obviously, as you guys know, one of the things we do now is, you know, we work very closely with NetJets and looking out roughly about a year that these things come into backlog based on, you know, how their sales team's doing out there selling these aircraft. It's a great part of our, of our backlog, and it's a great part of our business. It is, as you guys know, tends to be at a lower margin because you know, it's kind of a wholesale sale, you know. They're the ones that are out there, you know, spend the money on sales forces and reaching out and selling to that, you know, large customer population.
You know, NetJets remains, as do other fractionals, a really important part of the business and, you know, it's a really, really important part of our customer base are these fractional owners. As far as the deal with NetJets, you know, we are in constant discussions in terms of forecasting unit volumes. As you get to where you get towards the end of a particular, you know, quantity buy, obviously we'll work with NetJets to work on what, you know, comes next. You know, that's kind of a business arrangement between the two of us, obviously.
The actual forecast and backlog that's reflected in our numbers is really kind of a rolling one-year process, regardless of what the size of the, you know, sort of overall, you know, arrangement is between ourselves and NetJets on, you know, Latitude and Longitude volumes.
Great. That's very helpful. Thanks, Scott.
Sure.
Your last question today comes from the line of Doug Harned from Bernstein. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thank you. I wanted to go back to the discussion around the size of the backlog as it, as it clearly has grown quite a bit over the years. When you look at the backlog, as it slowed sequentially in this quarter, how do you contrast the demand you're seeing for new aviation sales to basically the wait time that's there? In other words, there's a point where you just flat out are gonna lose customers if they have to wait too long. Do you see a constraint on the growth from that at this point?
Well, you know, we really haven't seen that. You know, I mean, I think the whole industry is in a similar situation, right? If we were in a situation where you couldn't get an aircraft for 18 months to two years, and somebody else had an aircraft they can get tomorrow, then yeah, you could lose that customer. I think, you know, obviously, somebody could go buy a used aircraft or something of that nature. I think right now the whole industry is in this situation, and frankly, it's where this industry should be, right? I mean, these are, you know, complicated air assets. They're. A lot of times customers already have aircraft. They need to sell their used aircraft. You know, look, I think Remember this industry actually worked like this way for a very, very, very long time.
The aberration has been since 2008 to the last two years ago, where you didn't have much of a backlog in this class. Generally speaking, you know, this industry has been, you know, a backlog business, and it should be a backlog business. By the time you specify aircraft and configure aircraft and customize the aircraft, this is really where we're sitting today is what normal should look like, not, you know, what we've seen in the past 10, 12 years.
When you get to this situation though, which is clearly a good situation, the solution always is to add capacity. We've seen that happen in past cycles as well. When you look out today, what things would you want to see to make material increases in your production capacity?
Look, I don't think it's our production capacity so much. I mean, obviously we're struggling through some of these supplier issues and, you know, here tactically. You know, remember, as we talk about the delivery times, what our team's out there selling is we look at that backlog. They're selling aircraft and serial numbers that are to be delivered at certain dates, right? That's, that's how you manage, you know, this backlog, and then you've got to make sure that you dial in your production schedule to match, you know, what those committed delivery dates are. If you start to see, you know, a softening in the order rate, then you're gonna sell out fewer of those slots in the future, and then you would adjust, you know, your production.
If you all of a sudden say, "Hey, 2025, it looks like, you know, you could have five more Latitudes or, you know, 10 more M2s," then you do that, and you modulate your production capacity accordingly. I think as long as you're out there looking at these sort of 12, 18-month, two year kind of timelines, it gives you the ability to do that. Again, that's how this industry has always worked.
Just one last thing. When you look at the constraints coming from the supply chain, are there some specific areas right now that you would, you would point to as most difficult?
Yes. I mean, I could tell you a couple part numbers that are our biggest challenges. We're not gonna do that. I'm not gonna throw particular suppliers under the bus. You know, yeah, there's a couple particular products, a couple particular technologies from a couple particular suppliers that are our biggest constraint. I mean, there's always a bunch of little stuff going on, but for sure if you get a couple of these guys, you know, back in line that would be very helpful. Again, that doesn't mean we turn that into all of a sudden delivering a lot more aircraft because again we've committed dates, you know, to our customers.
It's a lot more for us right now about getting rid of all the inefficiencies in our production runs where we're having to build aircraft and swap parts around and do things out of sequence. It's very, very harmful to running a good smooth production operation when you've got to go chase all this stuff around.
Okay. Great. Thank you.
Sure.
Ladies and gentlemen, this conference will be available for replay after 10:00 A.M. Eastern time today through January 25th, 2024. You may access the AT&T Executive Replay system at any time by dialing 1-866-207-1041 and entering the access code 4482216. International participants dial 402-970-0847. Those numbers once again are 1-866-207-1041 or 402-970-0847 with the access code 4482216. That does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Teleconference. You may now disconnect.