And results compared with the first half year, but driven by seasonal factors, cost measures and some slight signs of stabilization in the public funded training business. I will come to that later. Nevertheless, 2025 remains a crisis year for us. Also, as published last week already, we did adjust our forecast and now expect an operating EBITDA of around €20,000,000 significantly lower than our guidance beginning of the year. Our strategy remains unchanged.
Organic growth in both segments, complementary, unorganic or acquisitional growth in Training. With our broad customer base, strong brands, and with the committed team we have, we are confident and well positioned to emerge stronger from this weak situation and from the current earnings crisis we are definitely in. So this is kind of the situation I would describe we are in. And now let's dive deeper in the results half year. I'll just wait a second.
I have to move that to the other side. Well, the overall picture of the German economy, you all know very well. Yesterday, we received the information that we had a decline in second quarter compared to first quarter again and a zero point zero growth year on year. So the weak situation simply is ongoing. There might be some some indicators for future improvements.
Business climate index is slightly improving, but on a very low level. And for me also, the situation that we receive new information on the tariff situation is independently from the level of future tariffs is at least an opportunity that we have kind of a more stabilized and more visible situation for corporations. But as it is just a few days too early to state. But what we know from clients the last month is that every client operating internationally was on full brakes regarding decision making processes and investments in the future as long as this situation remained unsolved. The highlights in first half year, in a nutshell, and I will dive deeper later, is that in the Personal Service segment, we found ourselves in Q2 even on a lower level compared to Q1, something we actually did not expect.
And this also has an impact on the upcoming quarters, the lower level. We saw, as we stated, an improvement in March in some of our services, but this momentum did not continue in second quarter, and we found ourselves even on a lower level. Also, market turbulences in the B2G training segment, I will dive into later, resulting in a decreasing number of participants and this impacting revenues and earnings. So our EBITA margin deteriorated for the first half year to 3.4%, a level actually we are not used to. Earnings per share at the level of €0.12 for the first half year.
So as I already stated, we saw the need to inform the market already last week that based on that results for the first half year, we had to adjust our forecast as stated. Also in second quarter, the dividend payout following the AGM took place €3.4.03 per share. The business development in the second quarter twenty twenty five. Overall, we saw a roughly 20% revenue decrease, a 25% net fee or gross profit decrease, resulting in a significant decline in our operating EBITA of around 85%. So this was based on the overall economic situation, which led in both segments to a lower than expected Q2.
In the Staffing segment, the ongoing decline of companies in decision making process, in their willingness to hire, in the time to hire period of time, and also the re increasing reluctance of potential candidates to change jobs is slowing down the business and is, well, negatively influencing the performance level of the branch office organization. In the b two g training segment, we had insecure situation around federal budgets. We had some changes in the regulatory environment, how to proceed training vouchers, and the already known effects regarding visibility of our product portfolio. For the full half year, the revenue decline, 17.5% gross profit, more than 20% down and the operating EBITA, close to 80% below prior year's level. Also for the full half year, it's the same like for the first for the second quarter where these effects increase, but the pressure on staffing and b two g training were the reason in regards of top line pressure.
We did some investments still in our, well, forward looking activities, digital transformation, future learning platforms. So there were some expenditures we had to take. Nevertheless, significant cost savings measurements are in place and will have they already have an impact, but they will have an increasing impact over the turn of the year, so in the second half year. Depending on the near term development, and here I'm talking about week by week monitoring of the situation, we do have additional measures planned and as backup ready to execute depending on the situation development. So in the second half year, not from a change in the overall climate of the economy, but from the seasonal factors, from cost measures and in terms of B2G training from stabilization in the market, we expect higher results in second half year than in first half year.
Before diving deeper in both segments, this is an overview of the current set and split in revenues and gross profit. So here, quite transparently, permanent placement is still the most important service we have in our staffing portfolio. The most stable service, interim project management, unfortunately, is the lower part of our business. So the more solid performance here is not really covering the weakness we see in temporary placements or temporary staffing and permanent placement. Should should say temporary staffing here.
So in the personal services segment, this is the overall development over the quarters, last two years. I want to show you more this broad view to see that in the recession year of 2023, following significant growth in 2022, not in Germany, but with the Amadeus fire business, we saw still growth, especially in permanent placement. And we also enter 2024 still on a quite solid level with slight decreases in another year of a recession, but then the development accelerated, and the behavior of the clients became more and more cautious. As you can see, quarter by quarter, all three services lost momentum. And in Q2, in temporary staffing and permanent placement, we see a clear decline on a quarter year on year comparison.
In top line, you see also the billable days. Just as a remark, in q two, we saw fifty fifty nine days. We were able to charge time to customers in training and in and in staffing in the temporary services. And in a q three, you normally have, like, sixty five, sixty six days. This year, sixty six.
So this seven days alone will deliver additional profitability in comparison to second quarter in an unchanged market environment. So temporary staffing at a net fee level of 18,400,000.0 in the meantime. What we do not see is any change in behavior of customers. The demand level is decreasing or decreased now for a couple of quarters. And we do not see a counter reaction of clients in times of uncertainty and recession to cover perm vacancies with temp requests.
In permanent placement, parallel development under under pressure, but for both services also counts that we still find quite a level of demand decreasing, but the level of demand that we have a well utilized organization. But the performance or the conversion of requests and placements is at a low level currently. So even the shortage of skilled workers in Germany remains a factor for both the services, but that factor is pushed back compared to the last years by the client behavior and the lower level of demand and conversion. Interim management saw a slight decline in second quarter, but still stable compared to the rest of the market. In figures, revenue in second quarter down 24% and net fee, the even more significant KPI in staffing by 28%, resulting in an earnings decline of 65%.
This net fee level we saw and the service the performance of the services were on a lower level than we saw in the first quarter. The weakness we anticipated, but the additional decline was, for us, not expected in our forecast. So what I stated in the last line and and touched before, Although we have the shortfall in skills in the labor market, this is increasingly or was increasingly in second quarter back again, overweighted by the economic risks the clients saw. And I would call it a parallelization of the market and the behavior of the participants in the market. This is the picture for the overall half year net decline of 25%.
Compared with the previous year, the number of our fee earners, how we call it the sales consultant in the staffing organization, is down by 14%. So we are very carefully in replacing vacancies following fluctuation. And there's also certain pressure on performance at low performing end, as you can imagine. But structurally, the staffing organization, the branch office organization of 22 branch offices throughout Germany is in place and in that regard unchanged. We need that organization in a improving environment to ramp up the business back again.
And currently, we are not planning to touch that. So strict cost management is currently, well, the day to day business. There are still IT investments made. Here also cost measures are in place, but that means that the increase of the IT expenses will not take place at planned initially, but the investments in the future setup for us organizations is ongoing despite the crisis. Now, I would like to touch on the training segment.
Also here in second quarter, we saw a very disappointing situation, a loss making quarter. So 15% in revenues, 20% in gross profit and a negative result of 900,000.0 Main reason is the major part of our training business, the B2G market. And here, we had three phenomenons touching our operating our operations. And two of these developed, well, more negative than anticipated. So the pressure we saw in second quarter was increasingly higher than we saw at beginning of the year.
What are the three phenomenons? First, as of January 1, we saw a change in responsibility regarding the issuing of training vouchers from the job centers in Germany to the employment agencies to different organizations. And that was a regulatory change. So the governmental institutions had to change their their processes. We knew that and we anticipated some ramp up, well, period of time to initiate these processes, but it takes longer than expected.
Now we have these signals at midyear in the market that it is now starting to work, but it took a longer time, and it was differently handled in in specific regions. So we saw some regional, well, stuck situations in the issuing of employment vouchers because of that change. Second is that also at the beginning of the year following the initiation of the new coalition in Germany, we expected that before the summer break, we would have an agreed federal budget for 2025, not next year, but this year. Here, it also came to additional discussions, and we do not have a federal budget so far for the current year. It is planned now for September, October combined with 2026 budget.
So that means that basically throughout the whole year, public spenders do not have a secure situation. And all activities, well, are burdened by that situation. Another factor which, well, gave struggle in the market and led to a declining number of people receiving training vouchers, although we have an increasing number of unemployed people in Germany. And the last but very expected and anticipated factor but still in place is that, and you know that from meetings we had before, that the visibility of the large players is what was limited last year by some regulatory changes in the terms and conditions. So despite an underlying positive momentum in a countercyclical market with an increasing number of unemployed people.
For that three reasons, the market is not performing alongside, and this leads to an increasing gap in the number of our participants and this throughout the whole year. Well, long, long story, but as this is a very important factor for the the current situation, I wanted to try to explain it that excessively. So Comcaref and GfN saw a more than expected decline in the top line or impact on the top line. And although we implemented additional cost measurements that did not offset these effects. At the bottom of the table, you see the development in the three subsidiaries.
So in the B2C market, where the tax college is doing most of the business, we see a positive development and increasing revenues. The pressure comes from GFN and and Concave due to the reasons mentioned above, so with declining revenues. For the first half year, basically the same picture. As the development accelerated, you see here 10% or 11% revenue declined 17% in gross profit and a small positive result for the first half year of 700,000.0. Same in the relation of the revenue development, so a positive growth in B2C and the tax college environment, GFN for the full half year still on a small growth figure and a decline of Cambridge College business.
So the declining result basically follows the top line pressure we have. Some investments we still do in our technology and learning platforms. We adjusted the size of the training organization, but this is not covering the decline of participants. It is not that fast reacting if you have a training organization in place to handle a higher number of participants than you actually do have. As we still have the goal to inorganically grow also our training segment and do additional business development.
We continued that in that challenging situation and also allocated some resources here on in the preparation of potential acquisitions. One other information in the training segment is that in Q2, there was an option executable to own 100% of GFN in the end before we had a 25% minority shareholder in. So that option was executed, And now we have the ownership of 100% of GFN that was done in second quarter in, actually, in April or May. One statement on the dividend payment as it was in second quarter. I mentioned it already in the beginning that in May, following the AGM, we paid out €4.03 per share and executed for the third year the current dividend policy of a payout ratio of 67% or two third of our earnings per share.
I want to briefly touch also our business drivers we have in staffing and training and want to point out that the underlying drivers for our business are, from our point of view, intact. If you take out the sentiment and regulatory factors that we see in the current market situation depressing our earnings capability. So high high competitive pressure, but also strictly regulated in Germany. And the shortage of qualifications and skills as a very critical success factor for corporations in in Germany, which will well, even the labor market will even more tighten by the demographic development with the baby boomers. And also in terms of qualifications needed, I think, also for technical reasons or development in technology, AI, etcetera, the skill sets will will change.
There will be a lot of qualification need. And this is also in terms of the view of the government and all other stakeholders in the market, the most important labor market policy instrument for unemployed people to up or reskill them. So in midterm, the will willingness to invest in recruitment and qualification and retention of personnel will be a key driver in Germany. And we have increasing market entry barriers by the need of processes, infrastructure, and technology, I would also say increasing. And Amadeus Fire group from our point of view with a unique portfolio of the comprehensive two segments of staffing and training is very well positioned to gain from that developments.
But for the moment now, as stated, and here are some explanations, we had to adjust the outlook based on the lower than expected second quarter and the projection from that business level for the end of the year. We saw the need to do so. What we also did on did on a group level is that we even broadened the range of of the earnings expected. The reason here for is in Transpi, but that means also potential upside potentials or market recovery and fiscal stability unlocking some potential on the one hand side. And on the other hand side, also the, well, the counterpart of their developments to have an ongoing uncertainty.
And also, what I said on a on a, well, basically, week and monthly view potential structural adjustments we could do if the business is not picking up. So in staffing, as I said, the projection is that the year end targets will not be met and that we will the assumption is that we will see no recovery in 2025. So no turnaround this year and focus, focus, focus on improving efficiency and implementing also all the cost saving measures we started and will have in place over the year, having in the end a smaller but efficient and, well, intact organization to gain from a turning market, which someone we will see. And training segment, well, also below expectations. Therefore, in the outlook, an adjustment here, we do see a normalization of the market environment.
The current situation is that we will have a federal budget September, October. The processes start to be in place after the shift from the job centers to the agencies. And the ramp up of participants is starting, but it will take some time that these revenues will come through, and they are on a lower lower level than we anticipated before. Cost measures, as I said, in place. And depending on the further development, additional measures might be initiated in terms of adjusting the training organization to the current level of participants.
B to c, positive. We will achieve our our goals. B to b, smaller part of the business will remain under pressure. Here, the b to b business, the same drivers account like for for the staffing segment. Here, we have some, well, some potential from from, well, products around technology, AI, etcetera, where the demand currently is picking up in the market despite of the overall environment.
And we have also some products in our portfolio to gain from that. This all ends. This is describing the change of our forecast compared to the one we made before. Here, on in comparison to prior year level, a 15% decrease in revenue is what we expect. A significant decrease in earnings by around 65% to around €20,000,000 for the group.
And well, in both segments also significant declines, we see we will see more earnings in second half year than in first year for the reasons I described, described, but not a fundamental change in the situation for 2025. Just to let you know, we are I'm of the opinion being, well, also in charge for sales organization. If the market is not good, you have to be out at the customer. This is why we not only have this discussion currently, and I'm happy to answer your questions in a minute, but also try to be out presenting ourselves at several conferences in the second half of the year. You will find here maybe some conferences you participate in and can ask for slots.
Investor Relations is happy to address your needs if you want to see us in person or one on one anytime. This would be my my presentation. Now, Sarah, back to you as a moderator initiating the q and a session.
Thank you so much for handing over, Robert, and thank you for the presentation and the dive into your first half year. So we are now happy to take your questions. And if you would like to speak directly to Robert, just raise up your virtual hand. And if you've dialed them by phone, you can do this by pressing star key 9 followed by star key 6. And if you're not able to speak freely, you can also submit your questions in the chat box, and we will read them out for you.
And, having said this, we received, the first hand. And, yeah, Andreas Wolf, you should be able to speak now.
Hi. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for taking my question. I have the following ones. So, Robert, said that, basically, the employee structure will remain intact to be ready for market recovery.
What is the corresponding employee number and cost level that we that we should calculate with just to be able to better assess a possible earnings trough. And the second question is also related to personnel. Have there been any severance payment in the quarter during the half year that might not recur going forward, or will there be such payments in H2? The third question is related to training. Could you comment on the effectiveness of the measures that Amadeus has taken to improve visibility after the new portal launch of MindNow?
And the fourth is obviously related to the dividend. You you've mentioned that or or repeated that the dividend policy is paying out two thirds of EPS. If I look at cash flow, especially after rental payments, I would assume that Amadeus might have to pay this dividend from from the substance. Is this a correct view? And what would be the implications for for the dividend payment? Thank you.
Thanks, Andreas. So first, I'm not 100% sure. I think I asked about you asked for the for the staffing organization. Here, the decline in the headcount of the fee earners is 14%. The overall headcount, this is including some additional roles in the branch office organization, is 15%.
What I said is that we structurally keep the organization in place, but we have a lower headcount. Well, as long as the situation remains as we see the the the current situation, the step by step decline in the overall number of employees in the training organization will continue. But we will not well, adjust the organization in terms of closing down branch offices or closing, well, certain service segments or qualification segments, meaning accounting, office, IT, we are in. So structurally, we will keep our position here in place. This partly answers also your question on additional payments made in the first half year.
There was no restructuring in neither in staffing nor in training. So nothing, let's say, significant. Sure. You always have some some of these payments. They are also on a slightly higher level than in in normal times, but not significantly.
What I said regarding second half year, regarding the the measures we take and have well prepared depending on the on the overall development. There might also there might be activities like that, like you mentioned, and that we will have then additional payments to be made. Measures regarding visibility, well, I would say dozens of measures. So that would, in the end, mean dive deep improvement of alternative channels, optimizing the offering to the to the MyNow or Cosnet channel initiatives on on conversion rates, initiatives on how to address the interested person and get access to unemployed directly. So, well, it's it's it's a broad range.
We also did some market talks actually realizing that what we are talking about is something the large players in general face, and we try to address that continuously also with the with the employment agencies representatives, but we do not concretely expect a rollback or another change in in the terms and conditions. At least this is nothing we would plan on. And latest dividend policy. Well, it is, what is it, two months ago that we did the payment. Regarding the cash flow, it is as we are, well, good converting free cash from operational results.
The situation is, as you mentioned, that cash generation is at a lower level than we saw that in normal times. But no decisions made so far and that early in the year regarding a potential policy for the next moment in time that we have to discuss that at the at the AGM. We are always looking carefully at at capital allocation. So nothing to state currently on on future dividend payments, actually, Andreas.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for your questions. So and then we have a further virtual hand from Simon from Oppenheimer. So please go ahead and ask your questions.
Thank you very much. This is Simon from Oppenheimer from Kepler Cheuvreux. I have a question on the personal service segment. Can you please help me understand how the client sentiment has evolved from the second quarter into the third quarter? Has it improved slightly or has it deteriorated further?
I'm also curious what your clients are saying about their hiring appetite, especially with the upcoming stimulus package in mind. Thank you.
I think the upcoming stimulus package you mentioned is too too abstract. So I yesterday, I heard an interview of of the, well, head of the lobbying organization for for construction industry, And they are facing currently a not functional outflow of public funds from the existing budgets and the not yet taking place initiation of the extra budget everybody is expecting to see outflows from in the near future. So here also, in client behavior, we do not see a change. And that accounts for, well, the beginning of the third quarter in general. We haven't seen any worsening of the situation so far.
So first month, well, should be it's not done, but should be in line with April to June. What we saw, and this is also what we based our expectations on, so no change in behavior, but neither in a positive way. Clients are remain cautious. They start to talk about backlogs. They also have in in vacancies, but they are addressing not the market so far with this potential vacancies they do have.
So our assumption is here that we will not see in our staffing market an extra stimulus in the second half year. Well, from my point of view, in the end, latest in '26. But for second half year, we haven't.
Okay. Thank you very much. And then maybe a question on training segment. In your h one results, you mentioned you expect a moderate increase in enrollment figures for the for the second half. Shouldn't we ex not expect more an acceleration given that the allocated budgets are still significantly higher for this year?
That might take place, Simon, but that will just partly affect 2025 and would but would deliver nice momentum in 2026. So basically, we're a little bit running out of time that these vouchers are granted. The training is starting and delivering additional revenues. We will as I said, we we do foresee a pickup and an improving situation. But as we are on a lower level at this point in time of the year, this is in the end not changing the struggling picture of 2025.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Thank you so much for your questions. So in the meantime, we did not receive any further questions. So ladies and gentlemen, just let us know if there are still open topics you would like to discuss with Robert. So let's wait a couple of seconds. But to me, it seems there are no further questions.
So I assume everything appears to be answered. And with this, we will come to the end of today's conference call. So thank you everyone for joining and you've shown interest, and a big thank you also to you, Robert, for for your presentation and your time for answering the questions. All the best for the second half of the year. It was a pleasure to be your host today, and I hand back to you for some final remarks.
Well, first, thanks, Sarah. And second, thanks thanks everyone for being part of that presentation. As I said in the beginning, what happened in the first half year and in the outlook we had to give is something we wanted to avoid that we have to adjust for 2025. But this is what we did and needed to do. I think we are well prepared and we are working heavily on, well, changing the situation.
The moment in time, the markets will support us a little better. The earnings capability will back increase of Amadeus fire. And this is actually what we are on a day to day basis and heavily work on. So thanks for being with us. And looking forward the next quarters to present someone a turning situation. Thank you very much.