Good morning, welcome to the BMO Financial Group's Q1 2020 earnings release and conference call for February 25th, 2020. Your host for today is Ms. Jill Homenuk, Head of Investor Relations. Ms. Homenuk, please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, and thanks for joining us today. Our agenda for today's investor presentation is as follows. We will begin the call with remarks from Darryl White, BMO CEO, followed by presentations from Tom Flynn, the Bank's Chief Financial Officer, and Pat Cronin, our Chief Risk Officer. We have with us today Cam Fowler from Canadian P&C and Dave Casper from U.S. P&C. Dan Barclay is here for BMO Capital Markets, and Joanna Rotenberg is here for BMO Wealth Management. After their presentations, we will have a question and answer period where we will take questions from pre-qualified analysts. To give everyone an opportunity to participate, please keep it to one question. Darryl will close the call with concluding remarks. On behalf of those speaking today, I note that forward-looking statements may be made during this call.
Actual results could differ materially from forecasts, projections, or conclusions in these statements. I would also remind listeners that the bank uses non-GAAP financial measures to arrive at adjusted results to assess and measure performance by business and the overall bank. Management assesses performance on a reported and adjusted basis and considers both to be useful in assessing underlying business performance. Darryl and Tom will be referring to adjusted results in their remarks unless otherwise noted as reported. Additional information on adjusting items, the bank's reported results, and factors and assumptions related to forward-looking information can be found in our 2019 annual report and our first quarter 2020 report to shareholders. With that said, I'll hand things over to Darryl.
Thank you, Jill, and good morning, everyone. Today, we reported a very strong and balanced Q1 performance with earnings of CAD 1.6 billion, up 5%, including revenue up 8% and pre-provision pre-tax earnings up 16%. All of our businesses contributed, delivering good performance consistent with business potential and with clear momentum in key areas of competitive strength. In Q4, we expressed to you confidence going into the new year with optimism around stabilizing economic environment, overall client sentiment, and of course, our own business plan. Today's report supports that view. For the quarter, we delivered operating leverage of 4.6% with every business above 2%. Efficiency improved a significant 270 basis points year-over-year with a strong total bank revenue performance and disciplined expense management. We remain committed to an expense growth rate of 2% or better for the year.
The strength of our operating performance allowed us to earn through elevated provisions. Overall, portfolio credit quality remains good with some pressure in two areas, and we expect provisions to come down from this quarter's level. Pat will discuss provisions in more detail in his remarks. Capital remains strong at 11.4%, even after absorbing regulatory changes in the quarter. Our U.S. segment continues to deliver against healthy expectations. U.S. PPPT was up 10% with a particularly good contribution from capital markets. This quarter, every one of our businesses contributed to achieving our objective of consistent long-term financial performance, executing against clear customer-driven, competitively differentiated strategies. Starting with Canadian P&C, we had another strong quarter with net income growth of 8% and PPPT growth of 10%.
Robust loan and deposit growth contributed to overall strong revenue growth of 7%, resulting in the highest operating leverage for Canadian P&C in the past 12 quarters at 3.6%. We're seeing steady market share gains across almost every product category, including personal deposits, lending, and cards, as well as commercial deposits and lending, all consistent with the strategy we outlined at Investor Day. In personal, we were extremely proud to receive the top overall score in J.D. Power's 2020 Canadian Retail Banking Advice Study, marking a major leap forward from our third-place ranking last year. BMO placed first in five of seven categories in the study, which measures customer satisfaction with the advice and guidance they receive from five major Canadian banks.
At the same time, the BMO Performance Plan was rated best checking account with a big bank in Canada by MoneySense Magazine. On the digital innovation side, this quarter, we introduced BMO Insights, a personalized automated solution that uses artificial intelligence to provide actionable insights to help customers manage their day-to-day finances and cash flow. Canadian commercial also continues to be a core element of our success as we drive above-market performance in line with our risk appetite and with no change in our disciplined approach to pricing. Our success is driven by our expertise, our unparalleled industry knowledge, and our commitment to going above and beyond for our customers. Increasingly, that's with the support of digital innovation as well.
For example, BMO Business Xpress, our industry-leading small business lending platform, which allows customers to be approved for a loan in just minutes, is on track t o surpass CAD 1 billion in new authorizations next month. Turning to U.S. P&C, we had another good quarter, absorbing the full impact of recent rate decreases while still driving year-over-year constant currency revenue growth of 3% and PPPT growth of 5%. Disciplined expense management helped deliver positive operating leverage of 2.1% and a new low efficiency ratio of 55.2%. NIM remained relatively stable quarter-over-quarter with the benefit of deposits growing faster than loans, and our expectations are for continued stability through the year. Our U.S. commercial business delivered double-digit year-over-year loan and deposit growth with some expected quarter-over-quarter moderation in loan growth.
This quarter, we announced the opening of our first commercial banking office in Los Angeles, building on an already strong presence in Southern California. As many companies headquartered in California have significant Canadian operations, it's further proof of our commitment to provide our North American customers with unparalleled commercial expertise and value. We look forward to talking to you about this, along with more on our strategy to continue to build our leading North American commercial presence at our April sixth investor event. In U.S. personal and business banking, our deposit momentum continues with digitally acquired deposits growing nearly 65% quarter-over-quarter. Digital accounted for just over 20% of total retail deposit growth this quarter in the U.S., with 98% of that coming from markets outside of Illinois and Wisconsin. Turning to wealth management.
With net income growth of 21%, PPPT growth of 24%, and operating leverage of 5.9%, Wealth Management delivered a strong, balanced performance driven by higher client assets, continued diversification through double-digit loan and deposit growth, and the benefit of disciplined expense management. The business continues to strengthen and streamline with targeted investments in key competitive growth areas. This quarter, we launched a suite of seven ESG ETFs that add to our leadership position, and we led the industry on ETF net inflows. We also recently opened new private wealth offices in both Dallas and Atlanta, joining forces with our commercial bankers there. This is a great example of how we're increasing our wealth penetration with our commercial and business banking customers, a key growth segment for BMO. Capital Markets had a very strong quarter with positive contributions across businesses and geographies. Net income growth was 38%, with PPPT up 50%.
It was a good start to the year with potential for revenue opportunities greater than we would have expected a quarter ago. Investments we've made in Capital Markets are proving their return as the business is now more consistently performing in line with earnings potential. Our U.S. Capital Markets business, for example, delivered net income above $100 million and pipelines across the franchise remained good. In January, we announced an agreement to acquire Clearpool, a cloud-based electronic trading platform with customizable algorithmic strategies. This acquisition emphasizes our commitment to clients as we provide leading-edge innovative trading technology to our global client base, and we expand our business in areas of opportunity and strength. Another area of opportunity for us is sustainable finance. This quarter, BMO Capital Markets led the first Canadian sustainability-linked credit facility for a major corporate client.
Following on the footsteps of our inaugural sustainability bond, these initiatives are cementing a leadership role for us within the market, one that will help drive long-term sustainable financial performance. Looking ahead, we feel confident for 2020. We have a strong and diversified business, well-executed strategies, and great momentum. Our performance this quarter reflects our disciplined approach and our commitment to our strategy, and we're confident in our ability to build on our performance through the year. Our success will be determined by the consistency of strategy and performance as well as consistency of purpose. Our purpose to boldly grow the good in business and life unites our employees, builds trust and loyalty with our customers, and sets a clear path for our future.
Today, we're very proud to be named by the Ethisphere Institute as one of the world's most ethical companies for 2020, a recognition that we've now received three years in a row. For the second consecutive year, BMO Harris Bank was recently recognized by Forbes magazine in its annual list of America's best employers for diversity, a recognition that highlights our commitment to encouraging diversity and supporting all our employees. Diversity in all its facets is a cornerstone to our success. Supporting inclusive communities and workplaces is a critical component of that. This quarter, we announced a research partnership with the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, culminating in a corporate playbook to advance mental health awareness in workplaces.
We encourage every corporate leader to take accountability by adopting the playbook, as we firmly believe business performance success is only possible when directly tied to a strong commitment to workplace mental health. Supporting our customers, our communities, and our employees is how BMO will continue to drive long-term sustainable value and strong relative financial performance. With that, I'll turn it over to Tom to talk about the first quarter financial results.
Okay. Thank you, Darryl, and good morning, everyone. My comments this morning will start on slide eight. Q1 reported EPS was CAD 2.37, and net income was CAD 1.6 billion. Adjusted EPS was CAD 2.41, up 4%, and adjusted net income of CAD 1.6 billion was up 5%. As Darryl said, results in the quarter reflect good performance across our businesses with pre-provision, pre-tax earnings growth of 16%, operating leverage of 4.6% with each operating group above 2%. Good revenue growth and operating leverage helped us comfortably earn through higher credit losses in the quarter. Adjusting items this quarter are similar to past quarters and are shown on slide 25. Turning now to revenue. Net revenue of CAD 6 billion was up 8% from last year, reflecting strong performance in BMO Capital Markets, Canadian P&C, and BMO Wealth Management.
Expenses increased 3%, largely reflecting higher employee-related expenses given strong revenues and higher technology costs, partially offset by the benefits from productivity initiatives. We continue to make good progress on efficiency, with total bank efficiency at 60.3% in the quarter. As a reminder, expenses in the first quarter of each year include costs related to stock-based compensation for employees who are eligible to retire. This expense was CAD 90 million in Q1. Excluding these costs, the efficiency ratio would have been 58.8% in the quarter.
We are on track to deliver the expense savings from our Q4 restructuring charge in line with prior guidance. As a reminder, the expected annualized run rate savings in Q4 of this year are approximately CAD 300 million, with full-year benefits in the income statement of approximately CAD 200 million. These savings will contribute to achieving our 2% or better expense growth target for the year.
Moving now to slide nine for capital. The Common Equity Tier 1 ratio was 11.4%, unchanged from last quarter, with retained earnings growth offset by the impact of regulatory changes and the adoption of IFRS 16, which together had a 16 basis point impact on the ratio and higher risk-weighted assets. We expect the previously announced acquisition of Clearpool Group to close in the second quarter, with a capital ratio impact of a little less than 10 basis points. Moving to our operating groups and starting on slide 10, Canadian P&C had another strong quarter in Q1. Net income was CAD 700 million, up 8%. Pre-provision, pre-tax earnings growth was 10%. Revenue was strong at 7%, driven by higher balances, higher margins, and non-interest revenue. Total loans were up 7%, with commercial loans up 15%. Mortgage growth through proprietary channels, including amortising HELOCs, was 6%.
Deposit growth continued to be very good at 14%. Expenses increased 3%, primarily due to higher technology and pension costs. Operating leverage was strong at 3.6%, and efficiency improved to 47.3%. Moving to U.S. P&C on slide 11, my comments here speak to the U.S. dollar performance. Net income of $275 million was down from strong performance a year ago due to higher credit provisions, partially offset by higher revenue. As a reminder, credit provisions benefited from a recovery in Q1 of last year. Pre-provision, pre-tax earnings growth was good at 5%. Revenue was up 3%, driven by loan and deposit growth and higher fee income, partially offset by a lower net interest margin. Average loan growth was 12%, with commercial up 13% and personal up 9%. Deposit growth continued to be strong, up 11% from last year.
The net interest margin was down just one basis point from last quarter. The change in NIM was better than anticipated, reflecting less deposit spread price pressure and strong sequential deposit growth. With expense growth of under 1%, operating leverage was 2.1% in the quarter and efficiency 55.2%. Provisions for Credit Losses were up from last year at CAD 113 million. Pat will provide color on this in his remarks. Turning to slide 12, BMO Capital Markets had a good quarter with net income of CAD 362 million, up 38%. The U.S. business continued to have strong performance with net income of $110 million, up 53% and representing 40% of capital markets earnings in the quarter. Revenue was up 20%, with strong growth across both global markets and investment in corporate banking. Operating leverage was strong at 13%.
Over the last three quarters, Capital Markets net income has averaged CAD 320 million, which we feel is reflective of the earnings potential of the business. Moving to slide 13, Wealth Management had a good quarter with net income of CAD 300 million, up 21%. Traditional Wealth net income of CAD 218 million was up 19%, reflecting higher revenue and positive operating leverage. Loan and deposit growth continues to be strong at 14% and 12% respectively. Insurance net income was CAD 82 million, up 26%, primarily due to positive market movements in the quarter. The higher insurance income in the quarter was offset by costs from stock-based compensation expense in Q1. In effect, the underlying earnings were at the CAD 300 million level. Expenses were up 2%, reflecting higher revenue-based costs. Operating leverage was strong at almost 6%. Turning now to slide 14 for corporate services.
The net loss was CAD 106 million compared to a net loss of CAD 76 million a year ago. Results decreased primarily due to lower treasury-related revenue and higher expenses. To conclude, the strong first quarter performance demonstrates continued momentum in our business, consistent delivery against our strategic priorities, and the benefits of our diversified business mix. With that, I'll hand it over to Pat.
Thank you, Tom. Good morning, everyone. Starting on slide 16, the total provision for credit losses this quarter was CAD 349 million or 31 basis points. While our impaired provisions are elevated this quarter, the overall credit quality of our lending books remains sound, and we do not see any indications of broad-based credit weakness. Consequently, based on current business conditions, we expect our loss rate on impaired loans to revert to more normal levels in the coming quarters. The increase in impaired provisions this quarter was primarily due to higher losses in U.S. commercial, largely due to normal quarterly loss variability, as well as from specific weakness in transportation finance. In addition, our corporate lending portfolios experienced higher losses this quarter, concentrated entirely with oil and gas accounts.
Apart from oil and gas lending and transportation finance, our other lending portfolios exhibited stable credit metrics and low losses in the quarter. Turning to the specific credit performance in the businesses. Canadian consumer impaired loan provisions decreased CAD 7 million quarter-over-quarter to CAD 103 million, which at approximately 26 basis points, is lower both compared to last quarter as well as last year. As shown in the supplementary financial information package, Canadian consumer delinquencies decreased both compared to last quarter and to Q1 of 2019. Canadian commercial PCL on impaired loans increased to CAD 35 million from CAD 24 million last quarter. There were no specific industry trends or themes observed, and at approximately 16 basis points, this quarter's PCL rate reflects solid credit performance in Canadian commercial, consistent with the long-term average for this business.
U.S. consumer PCL on impaired loans was CAD 16 million, down slightly from the prior quarter. U.S. commercial PCL increased to CAD 116 million due to one larger loss and elevated provisions in the transportation finance sector, reflecting continued weak conditions in the U.S. trucking market. This weakness in transportation finance and the one larger loss I referred to accounted for approximately 50% of the total PCL in U.S. commercial this quarter. The remainder was a function of the normal variability we see from time to time in commercial portfolios with no discernible theme. Capital markets PCL on impaired loans was CAD 53 million. Consistent with last quarter, the provisions were entirely in the oil and gas sector and predominantly related to U.S. natural gas accounts, where very low commodity prices for natural gas continue to pressure some borrowers in this sector.
Switching briefly to slide 17, our U.S. exploration and development exposure is CAD 4.5 billion, a decline of approximately 4% from the prior quarter. Breaking this sector down further, we estimate gas-weighted gross loans and acceptances represent less than 1% of total business and government lending when measured on the basis of revenue. Turning back to slide 16, the provision for credit losses on performing loans was CAD 25 million, mainly reflecting modest credit migration and balance growth. On slide 18, formations were CAD 831 million, up modestly from CAD 799 million in the last quarter, with the increase fully attributable to business and government formations. The ratio of gross impaired loans to total loans increased four basis points to 62 basis points, driven by the higher formations and lower write-offs relative to recent quarters.
In summary, overall credit quality remains strong despite the higher provisions in our U.S. commercial portfolio and our natural gas loan book. Although there will be some continued pressure in oil and gas and transportation finance, I expect the impaired provision to nonetheless decline over the next few quarters, with loss rates averaging in the mid-20s basis points range. I will now turn the call over to the operator for the question and answer portion of today's presentation.
Thank you. We will now take questions from the telephone lines. If you have a question and you're using a speakerphone, please lift your handset before making your selection. If you have a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If at any time you wish to cancel your question, please press the pound sign. Please press star one at this time if you have a question. The first question is from Meny Grauman with Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning. Pat, I just wanted to follow up on the credit side of things. You gave a good detail, but I'm just wondering more big picture, what gives you confidence that what you're seeing is not the beginning of something more significant? If you could talk about transportation in particular, and then just overall key indicators that give you confidence in that better outlook for the rest of the year?
Sure. Thanks for the question, Meny. Yeah, I would definitely say that this quarter, in our view, is an anomaly. As I said in my comments, we expect the PCL to normalize starting in Q2 and then running for the balance of the year. The reason that we believe that is when we look across the various portfolios, first of all, starting with the consumer books, in particular, both Canada and the U.S. consumer books continue to be very solid. I think when you look at the PCL numbers and the delinquency rates, there's no reason for us to conclude that those low losses won't continue for the balance of the year. Canadian commercial at 16 basis points, again, a very solid quarter. We see no sector weakness or underlying decay in the credit metrics.
We expect Canadian commercial to stay within that range over the balance of the year. When I look at Capital Markets, the story really is just U.S. natural gas. Outside of natural gas, we had virtually no PCL in any other sector in Capital Markets this quarter. With respect to natural gas, we do expect that to moderate over the course of the year. When we look at our portfolios from the bottom up in both Houston and in Calgary, we see the PCL rates coming down in Q2, Q3, and Q4. They won't be 0, of course, but I think if you look at the two goalposts of 0 and where we were this quarter, somewhere in the middle of that range is probably a pretty good forecast for the balance of the year.
That really just leaves U.S. commercial. Of course, TF, as I mentioned, is a spot of weakness. Keep in mind, the numbers are relatively small there in terms of total losses. That's really a cyclical issue very specific to that sector. I would expect the loss to be somewhat similar next quarter and then declining linearly to the end of the year. Apart from that, we really had one lumpy loss, as I mentioned. That plus TF was really 50% of the PCL in U.S. commercial. As we look at all the other sectors, we don't see any reason to think that the rest of the portfolio won't perform fairly consistent with what you saw through most of 2019.
When I look at the credit metrics, in particular for U.S. commercial, I look at the weighted average probability of default in that sector. It actually went down slightly from Q4 and is virtually flat relative to Q1 of last year. That tells me there's no broad-based deterioration in the portfolio outside of that weakness in TF. That same trend for the probability default is similar for the wholesale portfolio in aggregate. When I look across the books, when I look at the sectors, when I look at the strength of the consumer portfolio, the strength of Canadian commercial, the strength of Capital Markets outside of oil and gas, to me, that all adds up to a moderation in the loss rates, again, into that range of the mid 20 basis point range that I talked about in my comments.
Just as a follow-up, we've heard from other banks that talked about coronavirus and just saying it's too early to tell. Just to clarify, when you talk about outlook, you're assuming no issues from that emerging risk, I would say.
I would say first and foremost, Meny, it's probably too early to tell. I think for the moment, our first concern is obviously with the health and safety of our employees in Asia and the other affected regions. We're obviously very focused on business continuity as well to ensure that we've got continuity in all of our regions in the event it gets worse. We are looking very closely at the tail risks within our mark-to-market books. We're not seeing any short-term impacts there either from COVID-19. We're running things fairly close to home in those books. Lastly, in the credit portfolios, that of course, will take probably longer to play out. It'll depend a little bit on how severe it gets and how long it lasts. When we look at first-order effects, we don't see concentration in sectors that would have severe impacts.
Certainly for things, say, like cruise ships where we have no exposure at all. That gives us some comfort that the first order impacts are probably relatively minor. Of course, second order impacts from things like supply chain disruption, and slowing economic conditions broadly will take longer to play out. We'll probably, it's too early to tell. We would see that as we drift through the balance of the year. You might see some of that show up in the performing provision as well. It probably in the short term will show up in changes in macroeconomic forecasts to the extent that our economics group decides to change that. Longer term, it's probably too early to say.
Thank you.
Thank you. The next question is from Steve Theriault with Eight Capital. Please go ahead.
Thanks very much. Just sticking with Pat for a second.
Hey, Steve. We lost you.
Sorry, can you hear me okay there?
Yep. We got you now.
Apologies. Sticking with Pat, not to put too fine a point on it, you mentioned mid-20s a couple of times. Was that intended to be sort of your thoughts on the full year PCL rate or the remainder of your PCL rate?
No. To be specific, that's for the remainder of the year. Obviously there can be quarter-to-quarter variability as you saw this quarter. That's pretty normal. On average for the balance of the year, we would expect to see something around that range for the next three quarters.
Okay. It sounds like what we're hearing is there was an idiosyncratic loss. Was it the construction item or the services industry item we see in the provision schedule? Is there any detail you can give us on that? Was it fraud related or was it just something else?
No. You're right, it was in the construction sector. It was not fraud related. It was a client actually that we've had in the bank for many decades, in a fairly idiosyncratic part of the construction sector. Not really something we would see applicable to the rest of the sector. They just ran into some specific difficulties. We tried to work our way through it with them, but unfortunately that led to a PCL in the quarter. You'll see that there's a bit of a spike in GIL in that sector as well. That's really just that one name that I'm talking about. We actually exited our exposure there, so we don't anticipate any further PCL from that, and we would expect that GIL balance to actually go down next quarter.
Okay. Thanks for that. Tom, if I could, you talked through the margin in the U.S., and obviously good news with the margin only being down one basis point. You talked about strong deposit growth. You talked about competition. The deposit growth actually looks a little weaker than the last few quarters. Was it that deposit growth was coming off or was it more the mix of the deposit growth? Maybe just some color there.
Yeah, sure. I'd say we were very happy with the margin in our U.S. P&C business. We had guided on our last call to a decline in the upper single digits, and in fact, we came in at down one. The big drivers there were sort of a better pricing environment in the market. When I say better than what we had seen off of the earlier Fed cut. As well, we had our loans growing at a higher rate of deposits. On the margin, the relative rate of growth is important, and deposit growth exceeded loan growth, and that helped the margin. Those were the big two drivers. Looking forward for the balance of the year, we do expect to be in a better place than we had thought.
Give or take, we think the better margin holds through the balance of the year.
Okay. That's helpful. Thank you.
Thank you. The next question is from Scott Chan with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.
Thanks so much. Just sticking to the U.S. side, I see loan growth is pretty strong, up 12% in total. Are you still sticking to your high single digit loan growth target in Fiscal 2020? If you are, maybe talk about why we think there's going to be deceleration throughout the year. Thanks.
This is Dave. Yeah, I think we would still stick to that. I think I said at the last quarter, high single digit. I also said I thought it would probably exceed, and has in the past, exceed the market as we continue to grow into areas that we have not been in the past. I expect that to continue. I don't see any variance from that. We were off a little bit in the first quarter. Still growing, but not as much, but I see that continuing to pick up in the rest of the year.
Okay. Thank you.
Okay.
Thank you. The next question is from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning, guys. First, just wanted to follow up, Pat, very quickly on the oil and gas portfolio. I'm sorry if I missed it. Have you disclosed how much of the book is natural gas related versus oil?
Yeah. We estimate that you can work off of roughly a little less than 1% of total business and government loans comes from U.S. natural gas, and you can measure it on the basis of revenue or production. That's revenue, and that's a pretty good estimate.
Got it. Just in terms of when you talk to a lot of banks exposed to the shale sector in Texas energy space, it feels like we're going to see maybe 12- 24 months of just cleanup going on as kind of the capital sources for some of these companies have dried up. Is your comfort around that book a function of you've done a deep dive and you don't expect any one-off lumpiness over the next few quarters? What's driving that? When I hear some of your peers in the U.S., they kind of talk about potential for more volatility at least over the next year as some of this flows through the pipe.
Yeah. We're certainly not forecasting when we think about loss rates or prospect for the sector increases in natural gas prices. There's likely to be some upward migration on that price, but fairly modest over the course of the next couple of years, so I think we're consistent there. Our view on losses coming out of the U.S. natural gas book in the next couple of quarters is, as I said, based on a bottoms-up analysis of our book. We look at not just the cash flow of our various clients, but their ability to liquidate assets in the event of a bankruptcy process and look at our asset coverage relative to loan value. It's a fairly detailed analysis.
There can be surprises in there, the number that I gave you, that range that I gave you earlier is our best estimate at this time based on a reasonably detailed bottoms-up analysis of that U.S. book.
Understood. I guess just a separate question, Tom, around I think you said Capital Markets last four quarters, the average being CAD 320 million, and that's kind of what you view as the earnings power for that business. Does that imply that you don't expect quarters like what we saw last year, like a sub CAD 300 million quarter? Was that the message in there, or I just want to make sure I understand that correctly?
Yeah. I'll say something briefly, and then I'll hand it over to Dan Barclay. We do see the 320 issues being reflective of the earnings potential of the business. We've invested in the business over time, and we've had very strong performance in the U.S., and so we're comfortable at that level. I'll hand it over to Dan to give a little color to that.
Sure. Thanks, Tom. Appreciate the question. As we look forward, I think Tom's highlighted the key piece as we have made the investments across the U.S. as well as adjust on some of our cost structure. What you see is that move up into the next level of earning potential. As Tom mentioned, the last three quarters average worked up to about CAD 320. We obviously had a very strong quarter this quarter above that at CAD 362. That's what we see going forward, strength in most of the businesses in the U.S. both on the market side, on the banking side, on the corporate lending side, all client driven. When we look at the pipelines and what we've seen to date, that continued on into Q2. Yes, I think we're confident that that's where we can see the business go forward.
Got it. Just since we have you, Dan, is the U.S. business where you want it to be? Just if you can very briefly talk about any investment spend or market share opportunities that you're looking at actively given some of the retrenchment of maybe the European players. Just how do you think about the U.S. business where it stands today?
I think consistent with where we've been at the quarter, and at this quarter, last quarter, and at Investor Day last year we continue to push forward to drive and double our market share in the U.S. We've made all the substantial investments, now it's into the scaling process around that. We do have multiple investments in most of our product lines, both people and banking. You saw the acquisition we made in Clearpool this quarter. You'll remember back to the KGS acquisition we made 18 months ago. All of those are investments that are continuing to grow and will bear fruit over time. Do have good confidence in our U.S. business and the growth that we see there.
Got it. Thank you for taking my questions.
Thank you. The next question is from Gabriel Dechaine with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thanks, Pat, for your thoroughness in the explanation of this quarter's credit trend. One of the frequent pushbacks I get from investors on the bank's growth in the past few years in the commercial book is 15% type growth. It's good on one hand, but worries about the credit quality down the road. What kind of confidence do you have or that what we see this quarter described as idiosyncratic losses or one-offs or whatever, won't start popping up a year or so from now following this strong period of commercial growth we've had in the bank, both in Canada and the U.S., and Dave or Cam want to pipe in, that's great too.
Well, thanks for the question, and I'll start, and then Dave and Cam can jump in. It's a good question. I understand the concern. The growth rates in 2019 were clearly high. I can tell you that the PCL you're seeing this quarter in U.S. commercial, I would say virtually none of that came from any account that was added in 2019. The majority were of vintages including that lumpy loss that I talked about that are quite a bit older. That one goes back decades. In our view, it's not correlated. I'll give you just one other stat. We look quite closely at the weighted average probability of default of new additions to the U.S. commercial loan book and compare it to the weighted average probability of default in the broader portfolio.
In every quarter, going back to Q1 of last year, new additions have been significantly better credit quality than the average in the portfolio. On that basis, would not expect to see PCLs. Certainly haven't seen it this quarter in terms of it being from recent vintage, and would not expect it over the course of the next 12- 24 months.
Let me just add to that. This is Dave. It's a great question on the U.S. and it's a natural question with the growth we've had. Let me say a couple things. Number one, the growth has been pretty deliberate over a 10-year period and has largely been in areas where we haven't been in the past, where we know the business, and most of the business that we're doing is where you've got assets behind it.
I feel really good about the growth and would never apologize for it. On this quarter, this was a particularly lousy quarter for PCL, and trust me, our team does two things really well. They take care of their clients, and they win new business. They're really good at that. They hate losing money, and they absolutely are beating themselves up a little bit this quarter, as we all are because it's a tough quarter, especially when you lose a 40-year customer that you've supported for a long time. That's tough. As I look forward and I look into the next quarter and the rest of the year, I've got the under on where Pat's got his PCL. I think we're going to do very well, as we generally do, and we'll see. You're right to be skeptical. We're going to prove you wrong, and as we have.
I think it's just a really good business. It continues to be a good business. I'll stop there. Cam may want to add a little bit on the commercial side.
It's Cam speaking. I'll just say on the Canadian commercial side, I'll remind you on this call, we've talked about a strategy that's focused on capacity creation and on diversification. It's important to remember, one of the big drivers of the strong growth that we're seeing in Canada is we have so much more capacity out there, either in terms of hires we've made, particularly in GTA or in the capacity we've created through the digital tools where Darryl mentioned earlier, we've now put a billion dollars through our automated lending platform. A lot more capacity being deployed towards existing customers and prospects. Two reasons I'd say around the confidence side.
Number one, it's seven sectors and five regions where we're seeing strength. By strength I mean double digit. That's as broad and diverse as I think you can be in our country, number one. Number two, further to Pat's comments on both spread and weighted average probability of default, the newer business we're putting on is stronger than the existing book. For those reasons, we're feeling confident.
Gabriel, it's Pat. Just one more time. We'll hit this issue head on as well in the investor event that we're holding, that I'm sure you're aware of coming up. It'll be a combination event between the commercial segments and risk to walk you through exactly why we've been comfortable with the growth rates, and why the risk profile of the portfolio remains consistent with our appetite over the course of the last few years.
I look forward to that. I think there's a lot of people wondering how when most, if not all banks are finding it hard to grow, but you're doing so and improving credit quality at the same time. Thank you.
Thank you. The next question is from Sumit Malhotra with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Good morning. First question is for Tom. I think it's for Tom. Just to go back to your transportation finance purchase, it was about five years ago now. Not to put you on the spot. I know when you bought this portfolio, it was about CAD 12 billion. I don't think it's all housed in the transportation section of your loan book breakout. Do you know approximately where this portfolio size is now, a number of years after that purchase?
Yeah. The portfolio now is about CAD 12.8 billion. I haven't looked at this number for a while, but I think at the time of purchase, it was closer to CAD 10 billion than to CAD 12 billion. It's grown at a gradual rate over time, and we didn't expect it to be a fast grower. It's a mature business and a good one from an ROE perspective. It's performed largely in line with expectations. We're happy with the business. I could go on here, but I'm looking at Dave, and so maybe I'll let him add a few comments.
Yeah. The only thing I would add to it, I think those numbers are right. The business is largely housed in our commercial business in the U.S. and probably 10% of it in our commercial business in Canada. I would say, I think you've seen this before, this team is by far the most experienced team in the industry. That's what we liked the most about it. They've been through the cycles, they've seen the cycles. They generally can predict the cycles. In times like this, and this, I think, will be a shorter cycle, a number of our competitors get in when things are really good and get out quickly. We've seen that recently, a couple have gotten out. That just makes it better for us. We've got the best team to run this through the cycles, and I'm very happy with it.
This is more of an industry question. It's probably for you, Dave. As you say, you're not going to apologize for the loan growth, and sequentially, it does seem to be a bit normal, not to put too much emphasis on three months. We also have seen a decelerating trend in the Fed data when it comes to C&I loan growth in the U.S. In your opinion, is that a reflection of the industry to margin trends, or has there been perhaps some deceleration in commercial activity in aggregate across the U.S.?
Yeah, I do think there's been, particularly maybe in the last fiscal quarter a little bit of a slowness, a little bit of concern on uncertainty on a whole number of fronts. We could go through them all. I've actually seen that, put the coronavirus aside, I've seen that actually pick up of late. There seems to be a little bit more certainty in the U.S. as far as a number of issues that have worked their way through. I don't expect that to continue, and I expect the economy will probably pick up, and we'll do as well. That Fed data is good to watch, but I would expect it to be a little bit better. That's my own personal view. Does that help?
Yep, that's good. I was going to switch over to Cam Fowler, if that's okay. For as strong the momentum your business is at, you probably don't get enough questions. One of the factors that I think has really been helping your outperformance on revenue the last couple of quarters has been the favorable trend on net interest margin compared to some of your peers. I could go into some of the factors I think that's driving it in mixed deposits, but I'd rather hear from you maybe from a pure business perspective. Is there something in the way that your business and your team has approached growth across your product base that is driving that outperformance and margin, which seems to be pretty significant again this quarter?
Thanks for the question. Thanks for the chance to chat for a little while as well. I think you've probably answered it for me. In Investor Day in 2018, we talked really specifically about the Canadian P&C business. We talked about outsized growth in deposits, in payments, and in commercial. You can see, roughly two years on, we are taking market share in all of those categories. To me, that mix and the quality of mix point is the single biggest driver. It is really important that deposits are moving like that. It's really important that payments are moving like that. That to me is the biggest driver.
Last one for you. Have you seen any change in the competitive environment in commercial? There does seem to be some difference in tone from the individual banks as to where their outlook on commercial loan growth in 2020 lies.
I would say that it's a little different by region and by sector. To the point I made earlier about the diversification of our growth, it does feel a little different everywhere. I would say on the whole, that we would expect some moderation towards the back half of the year, like in Q3 and Q4. That's an absolute comment. From a relative perspective, I would expect us to be firmly in the front.
Thanks for your time.
Thank you. The next question is from Robert Sedran with CIBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Just sticking with the Canadian business, I wanted to ask about the payments and the credit card side, and I'm not sure if it's for Cam or for Tom or perhaps for both, but you do see good outstanding growth in the credit card business. I see the card fee line is down in the supplemental at the all-bank level. I guess for Cam, which cards or which category of cards are the ones that are doing best for you, that are performing best for you? Perhaps some explanation as to why that card fee line is down, please.
Sure. That card fee line will come back. Two things that are at play, I think, in this quarter are a little bit on the interchange pressure side and a little bit on the Quebec legislation side. I do expect things to improve on the back half of the year. Our best performing, it's a pretty well-rounded performance on the card side in that the entire book's moving as we expected it would based on some investments we've made on marketing proposition and data.
Where I'm maybe most pleased of late has been the growth on the small business suite that we launched just a little over a year ago, four or five new cards and capabilities, which has been a smaller base, but fastest-growing within the book. On the round, I think it's stronger across the entire book, and I would expect the NIR to be a little better in the back.
I was under the impression that we were going to see some pressure on the card fee line in the second half of the year. I guess for you're saying that's not the case.
I think that there will be different forms of pressure. I just think that we have momentum that'll see us through it.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. The next question is from Mario Mendonca with TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Pat, first, just a quick clarification. You referred to the Canadian commercial PCLs ratio at about 16 basis points. Is that right?
That's correct.
I think you also said that was consistent with your long-term average. The reason I'm asking is I would get a very different number when I look at the industry. What I'm curious about is what time period are you looking? Have you taken into account the periods when commercial real estate was a problem?
Yeah. I certainly am not going back to the financial crisis. I think our books are quite a bit different, and in particular, commercial real estate is quite a bit different in terms of our mix, at least here at BMO versus what it was then. When you look at that level, I would say it's relatively consistent with what you would have seen through kind of 2016, 2017 and early 2018. We went into a very strong credit period, as you know, late 2018 and 2019. That was about as good as credit conditions can get for commercial portfolios, and we saw that both in Canadian and U.S. commercial. I think we've been flagging for a while that we're likely to drift up from those very benign points that we saw then.
Drifting up to a 16 basis point level to me is very consistent with what you would expect to see from a reasonably well-diversified commercial portfolio with the size of ours.
The long-term average that I would come up with, I imagine others would see something similar, would be something closer to 50 basis points, but that's including some very, very rough times in commercial real estate. Is your point here that you would look at those periods and say they're not representative of BMO's current business mix and practices?
Yeah. I guess maybe I wouldn't read too much into the consistent with long-term averages. We could debate on what the right long-term average is. My main point was at 16 basis points, that's a really good number from a loss rate. Whether you look at versus really rough times or even relatively benign times, that's a really good loss rate for a commercial portfolio. Clearly in really rough times like a financial crisis, it can get worse, but I don't expect that to occur in the next year, which is why I'm comfortable that we'll see that kind of a level continue for the next three or four quarters.
Okay. Real quickly, going back to COVID-19. When I look at your loan mix, there are a number of categories here, like manufacturing, transportation finance, what I think of as some of the largest categories in your loan book. When you stress test, I imagine you've started doing some stress testing for COVID-19. Would it be fair to say that a lot of your largest categories would be sort of in the crosshairs of a meaningful slowdown in economic growth cross border?
Well, I guess first of all, I would say it's really hard to tell, and it's far too early to say. Secondly, I don't know that I would even agree with that assertion because those segments, as you say, are quite large. They're also extremely diverse. Particularly manufacturing and services, as you mentioned, those encompass so many subverticals. Some of which, as you point out, might be in the crosshairs, many others will not. You're really seeing a large sector that's a collection of a lot of subsectors. It's an unfortunate way that we have to group it, but I think it doesn't lend itself to the characterization that you're making.
Okay. That's fair. Then just finally, when you talk about margins in the U.S. and looking for stability in margins in the U.S., presumably you're not contemplating any rate cuts. The reason I'm asking it this way, because again, going back to this virus issue, there are a number of economists out there calling for the U.S. to get more aggressive on rate cuts sort of as an insurance policy against a slowdown caused by COVID. What I'm asking here is you're not contemplating anything of that nature when you're referring to stable margins in the U.S.?
Hi, Mario. It's Tom. Two things. Number one, that's correct. The outlook of stable-ish assumed no cuts. Second point, if we did have another Fed cut, the impact would be in the zone of a couple of basis points.
Understood. Thank you.
Thank you. The last question will be from Darko Mihelic with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thank you. Good morning. My questions are for Pat. Pat, when I hear you speak about transportation finance and the natural gas segment, it sounds to me like there's been a significant increase in credit risk, and therefore what we should see is movement into stage two, a lifetime loss recognized against it. Going forward, if they do fall into impaired, well, we'll see a stage three, but the net impact should be much less in future. I can't tell. When I look at page 28 of your supplemental, it doesn't look to me like that's occurred. I'm confused a little bit. Perhaps you can also help me understand a little bit with respect to what's happened this quarter. In other words, how many of the files that hit this quarter came immediately from stage one into stage three?
How many of them were actually in stage two last quarter?
Yeah, I guess we probably don't have enough time to go into a file by file decomposition. I would say you did see some of the stage one and two migration this quarter. I can tell you of those balance increases in both stage one and stage two, roughly about 60% was credit migration, 40% was balance growth. From one to two, there was a concentration in that migration in oil and gas and transportation finance, and then a bit in some of the other sectors as well. It's certainly not broad-based.
What you might have seen this quarter in provisions as well, keep in mind that some of those PCLs can come from things that are already in stage three, where we took a provision in a prior quarter, and then that provision was increased in this quarter due to factors like we've gone a long way through a liquidation process, and the outcome turned out to be slightly worse than we thought. That was the case this quarter as well. We actually saw some PCLs coming out of stage three, and then as well, some that went from stage one and into three.
Is it fair to say that you have already migrated a significant proportion of these accounts into stage two, and that is what gives you comfort going forward, that even if they fall into stage three, you've already got a significant reserve against natural gas and transportation finance? Is that not the case?
No, that is the case. I look at something like, say, the watch list in the oil and gas space. The watch list in oil and gas actually went down this quarter versus Q4. That, to your point, that is because we moved it into impaired status and took the provisions that we thought. Doesn't guarantee, as I said earlier, that we don't see further provisions coming. There is potential for more migration. It'll be concentrated in U.S. gas, but things are fairly stressed there. Outside of that, as I said, we don't see a lot, and that's what gives me some comfort around the guidance that I've given for the next couple of quarters on what those losses could look like.
Last question then, can you maybe provide a bit of a quantum in terms of if I have a stage two provision against a natural gas or a transportation finance and it were to migrate to stage three, what's the quantum of difference? Is it that the increase in the PCL once it hits stage three would be another 10%? Would it be 50%? Do you have any sort of rough idea or what we've seen so far is maybe perhaps looking at the historical. Can you give us an idea? I mean, that ultimately is what's going to give us comfort that the future provisions really should be light given the fact that you're going from stage two to stage three, and the difference between the two is nominal or is it not nominal?
Yeah, it's really going to be case by case, as you would imagine. Stage two tends to be quite a bit more formulaic in terms of the provision. When it gets to stage three, we actually start to look through the details of asset value, asset coverage, sale valuations and things like that for that particular name. It's hard to draw a parallel the way you're looking for.
Your experience so far, do you have any kind of insight you can share?
Yeah. Generally speaking, I would say the provision that we take in stage two is probably not that dissimilar to what you might see on average over the longer term for the provision we'll ultimately take once it gets into impaired.
Okay. That's helpful. Thank you.
Thank you. There are no further questions registered at this time. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Darryl White.
Okay. Thank you, operator. In summary, I want to come back to where I started. This was a very good quarter for BMO at 4.6% operating leverage. When I look across all of our businesses, all of our businesses performed well, closer to their longer-term potential. We're seeing new levels, as you heard through the call, of earnings run rate expectations, particularly from our wealth and capital markets businesses. You also heard that PCL was elevated, but we earned through it and we expect it to come down next quarter and for the balance of the year. We're investing in driving revenue in key competitive growth areas while maintaining our commitment to 2% or less expense growth for the year with continued progress on our efficiency ratio.
Everyone at BMO understands that being more efficient makes us more competitive and even better positioned to drive long-term strong relative financial performance. Our commitment to our clients and our purpose is unwavering. Recently, we sadly lost one of the greatest champions of that purpose. On behalf of all of us at BMO, I want to take a moment to formally acknowledge the passing of a great friend, great business leader, and a true statesman, Monsieur Jacques Ménard. He was an architect of the Canadian broker-dealer industry, a figurehead for our bank in his home province of Quebec, and a model of purpose-driven leadership for all. He will be greatly missed. Thank you all for participating in today's call. We look forward to speaking to you again in May. Thank you.
Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.