Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the call for Granite REIT. Speaking to you on the call is Kevin Gorey, President and Chief Executive Officer and Teresa Neto, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin today's call, I would like to remind you that statements and information made in today's discussion may constitute forward looking statements and forward looking information, including but not limited to expectations regarding future earnings and capital expenditures as well as potential impact of COVID-nineteen, and the actual results could differ materially from any conclusion, forecast or projection. These statements and information are based on certain material facts or assumptions, reflect management's current expectations and are not subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in Granite's material filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the U.
S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including the Risk Factors section of its annual information form for 2020 filed on March 4, 2020. Readers are cautioned not to place any undue reliance on any of these forward looking statements and forward looking information, Granite undertakes no intention or obligation to update or revise any of these forward looking statements or forward looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise expected as required by law. In addition, the remarks this morning may include financial terms and measures that do not have a standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards. Please refer to the Q2 2020 condensed combined unaudited financial results and management's discussion and analysis of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Granite REIT Inc.
And all other materials filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators and U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time for additional relevant information. As a reminder, this call is being recorded today, Wednesday, August 12, 2020. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kevin Gorey.
Please go ahead, sir.
Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. I hope you're doing well. Welcome to our Q2 call. As usual, I'm joined this morning by Teresa Neto, our CFO Lauren Kummer, our Executive Vice President of Global Real Estate and Michael Rem Perez, our Senior Vice President of Global Real Estate and Head of Investments.
Theresa will begin this morning by taking you through our financial highlights and then I will follow-up with an update and hopefully some insights on our development and acquisition programs, leasing
and strategy.
And then I'll open up the floor to any questions that you have. So Teresa, over to you.
Thanks, Kevin, and good morning, everyone. Graham had posted a solid second quarter, delivering very strong same property NOI and FFO, AFFO per unit growth relative to the prior year. FFO per unit in Q2 was $0.97 an 0.08 dollars or 9 percent increase relative to the prior year and $0.08 lower than Q1 2020. Included in this quarter's FFO is a $900,000 fair value loss on trustee deferred stapled unit liabilities due to the increase in Granite's unit price during the quarter. Excluding this fair value loss, FFO per unit would be $0.99 Further, in Q1 2020, it included a $2,800,000 foreign exchange gain and a $800,000 tax provision reversal, where if excluding these items, Q1 twenty 20 FFO would be $0.98 on a more comparable basis.
FFO this quarter has been positively impacted by strong same property NOI growth as well as positive foreign exchange translation of our foreign based income, representing approximately 90% of our FFO as both the euro and U. S. Dollar strengthened by 3% on average in Q2 2020 relative to Q1. These were partially offset by the temporary dilutive impact of the $289,000,000 equity offering completed on June 2nd, where the full net proceeds have not yet been deployed and higher interest expense from the $500,000,000 green bond issued on June 4th. Subsequent to the quarter, the U.
S. Dollar has weakened while the euro has strengthened further, which could result in a net negative impact to Granite NOI, FFO and AFFO if FX rates remain at these current levels. Generally, a $0.01 change in either the U. S. Dollar or the euro FX rate relative to the Canadian dollar, it will result in an approximate annual $0.01 per unit change in FFO or AFFO.
With the recent volatility in the FX markets, Granite commenced mitigating part of the FFO AFFO foreign currency translation risk by entering into derivatives that protects Granite against significant declines of both the U. S. Dollar and euro. Additionally, Granite's unit price has strengthened since the end of Q2. Therefore, we expect further fair value losses on the remeasurement of our trustee deferred stapled unit liabilities to negatively impact G and A in the Q3 of 2020.
Granite's AFFO on a per unit basis in Q2 was $0.93 which is $0.05 or 6 percent higher than prior year, but $0.10 lower than Q1. Excluding the impact of fair value loss on deferred stables unit liabilities in this quarter and adjusting for the foreign exchange gain and tax provision reversal in Q1 2020 previously mentioned, AFFO per unit on a more comparable basis for Q2 2020 is $0.95 essentially in line with the $0.96 in Q1. AFFO related capital expenditures, leasing costs and tenant incentives incurred in the quarter totaled $2,000,000 which was higher than the $600,000 incurred in the same quarter last year and higher than the $1,100,000 incurred in Q1 2020. For the remainder of 2020, we are estimating total maintenance capital expenditures, leasing costs and commissions of approximately $7,000,000 for a total year estimate of approximately $10,000,000 resulting in increased deductions to AFFO relative to the first half of the year. This year, maintenance CapEx includes approximately $4,000,000 of recoverable maintenance CapEx that was pushed out from 2019.
As a result of a relatively low CapEx quarter and strong FFO performance, our AFFO payout ratio came in at 78% for the 2nd quarter. Operating metrics continue to remain positive. NOI on a cash basis for the quarter increased by 12,700,000 or 21.8 percent from the same quarter in 2019 and by $3,200,000 or 4.7 percent from Q1. Same property NOI for Q2 came in very strong relative to Q1 last year, increasing 7.4%, but on a constant currency basis increasing by 5.5%, driven by occupancy gains in the GTA, New Jersey and Mississippi, contractual rent increases and rent from an expansion completed at 1 of our West Jefferson, Ohio properties. Excluding this expansion rents, same property NOI for the quarter was 6.9% and on a constant currency basis 5%.
G and A for the quarter was $400,000 higher than the same quarter last year and $3,300,000 higher than Q1 2020. The swing in fair value adjustments to our unit based compensation as a result of the changes in our unit price resulted in a net in a negative variance of $3,400,000 this quarter relative to Q1 2020. Outside of fair value adjustments, G and A remains on track with internal budget. Where some savings have been realized from reduced travel, we have incurred to date a modest $100,000 in COVID related costs thus far this year. Looking out to the remainder of 2020, we continue to estimate G and A to be approximately $7,500,000 per quarter, which includes approximately $1,600,000 of non cash compensation expense per quarter, but assumes no fair value losses on gains associated with the increase or decrease in non cash compensation liabilities, which cannot be predicted.
With respect to current income tax, we are estimating approximately $2,100,000 in current income tax per quarter for the remainder of the year. As mentioned on the Q1 earnings call, we have another potential reversal of $1,700,000 in tax provisions in Q4 of this year, but it is too early to assess whether these tax assets can be realized at this time. The Trust balance sheet comprising total assets of approximately $5,800,000 at the end of the second quarter increased $700,000,000 since the end of Q1, driven by cash proceeds from both the Equity and Greenbond issuance net of acquisitions completed and by approximately $35,000,000 in fair value gains to Granite's investment property portfolio, offset by approximately $106,000,000 translation losses on Granite's foreign based investment properties. The fair value gain on Granite's investment property portfolio is attributable to the Trust's development property in Plainfield, Indiana, which was completed and leased in the quarter as well as fair value gains in the Trust GTA properties due to increases in fair market rent assumption, partially offset by fair value reduction in a few of the Trust's Austrian assets. The Trust's overall weighted average cap rate did not change and remains at 6% at the end of Q2.
Total net leverage as of June 30th was 23 percent, only slightly higher by 1% from Q1. The Trust's current liquidity is approximately $1,100,000,000 representing cash on hand of $600,000,000 and the undrawn operating line of about $500,000,000 I'll now turn over the call to Kevin for operational discussion.
Thanks, Theresa. As always, I'll keep my comments brief. I trust you've had a chance to review our MD and A and press release. I would like to begin by acknowledging our entire team at Granite for their effort and commitment during a challenging time for the organization and all businesses, frankly, in general. Despite working remotely for effectively the entire quarter, our team was able to deliver strong financial results for unitholders.
As well, we completed over 1,100,000 square feet of leasing in the quarter, delivered a 511,000 square foot development project in Indianapolis, raised almost 800,000,000 in capital, partially through the issuance of Canada's largest REIT Green bond, implemented a U. S. Dollar currency hedge on roughly 50% of our U. S. Dollar income, as Teresa mentioned.
We closed on roughly $330,000,000 in acquisitions, including 36 acres of land for development in Dallas. And lastly, we published our inaugural ESG update, and we collected over 99% of our rent for the quarter, not bad for a lockdown. As reported in our MD and A and press release, we have now closed on the 3 development properties in the Netherlands, and we expect to complete the new 240,000 square foot grocery related e commerce distribution facility next month. As mentioned, this new development complements our stated strategy of adding new generation food distribution products, particularly in Europe, to our portfolio. Further, the property is being developed to Green Excellence Certification, one of the highest green building designations available.
Our development project in All Points Indianapolis is now complete, as mentioned, and has been fully leased to a North American food distributor for 10 years. The resulting development yield slightly exceeded pro form a expectations. Further, the project achieved 2 Green Globes green building certification consistent with our sustainability program and our green bond framework. Site work is nearing completion on our Houston development, and we continue to evaluate market conditions for potential commencement of construction of the first two buildings later this year or early in 2021. Similarly, the construction of our project in Alplac, Germany was delayed due to the impact of the lockdown.
We are now currently repricing the project and plan to commence construction of the building in Q4 or Q1 2021. And finally, as an update, we continue to review the scope and cost of a planned expansion with the tenant at 22,095 Logistics Drive in Mississauga, and construction is expected to be delayed through 2020. From a leasing perspective, 2,400,000 square feet of leases were scheduled to expire in 2020. To date, we have negotiated extensions on new leases of new leases on 1,950,000 square feet or roughly 81 percent of the expiries at an average increase in rental rate of approximately 8%. The remaining 440,000 square feet of expires in 2020 represents just under 1% of our GLA.
For 2021, 1,900,000 square feet or roughly 4% of our leases by GLA are expected to expire. To date, we have renewed roughly 700,000 square feet of those 2021 expiries at an average rate increase of 6.7%. As Teresa mentioned earlier and as disclosed in our MD and A, same property NOI increased by 5.5% on a constant currency basis and 5% excluding expansions, which is ahead of expectations. Moreover, same property NOI growth was flat to positive across all geographic segments on a constant currency basis, led again by our U. S.
Portfolio of 9.7%, due in part to the expansion of our ACE Hardware distribution center property in Columbus, Ohio. With respect to rent collection and deferrals, we have received 99.3% of our rent for Q2. We have collected 99.7% of rent for July and rent collection for August so far is in line with normal. Conditions are ongoing with select tenants on outstanding rents, and we have so far agreed to a deferral with 1 tenant in Europe for 2 months' rent, of which only 1 half month remains outstanding, totaling CAD72,000. Conditions certainly may change, but at this point, we expect to collect all outstanding opportunity to thank our team once again for their efforts in achieving these results.
The levels of rent collection to date are truly a testament to the quality of our tenants, the quality of our people and our approach. I'm getting choked up. Further to my comments in Q1, I am very pleased to highlight our ESG update, which was published in June in conjunction with our $500,000,000 green bond offering. The update is available on our website, and I would encourage anyone who's interested to review the details of our ESG program, and please reach out to us with any questions or comments you may have. In closing, I would echo Teresa's comment that we posted a solid second quarter.
We delivered strong same property NOI and FFO and AFFO per unit growth year over year, and we finished the quarter with $1,100,000,000 liquidity, including $600,000,000 in cash. So we are very well positioned to continue to execute on our strategy and deliver strong results. Our acquisition pipeline remains strong in Europe, the U. S. And Canada, and we look forward to providing further updates on our Q3 call.
On that note, I will now open up the floor for any questions. Thank
Our first question comes from the line Sam Damiani with TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Thanks and good morning. Maybe Kevin, just to start off where you left off on the acquisition pipeline. Could you give a little color as to do you see anything closing in the Q3 and Q4? And what types of geographies those might be?
Thanks, Sam. First of all, for 2020, we do expect to be able to deploy most of the cash on hand by the end of the year. And in terms of geographies, I would characterize it, we roughly have $100,000,000 of acquisitions we're pursuing in Canada and the remainder roughly $500,000,000 would be split relatively evenly between Europe and the U. S. In Q3, I do expect we will be able to close on 1 or 2 acquisitions.
I don't think that they will be that material in size, though. I do expect that most of the activity in 2020 would occur in the Q4.
Okay. That's helpful. And just obviously congratulations on a great operational result in the quarter, rent collections and no bad debts, etcetera. How do you think about same property NOI growth for the latter half given the performance and the the strong resilience to the impacts of COVID-nineteen to date?
Well, we've had a lot of internal discussions on that. I think we're encouraged by where our same property NOI is for the quarter. Certainly, we do expect same property NOI for Q3 and Q4 to be below where it was this quarter. I think we agree on that. I think we feel the most appropriate guidance we could give is to revert to our initial guidance for 2020 at 3% without expansions and 4% with expansions.
We may do better, but I think that is appropriate at this time to maintain our initial guidance for same property NOI for 2020.
Thank you. And one last quick one. You saw the news obviously of Amazon and Simon potentially having some talks. Do you have any thoughts on the implications of that type of a hookup in the context of the industry?
I certainly think it's I mean, I've said before, I certainly think it's possible, but there are a lot of obstructions to making that situation work. So it's not something we would really pay attention to. I think that, again, you've seen with the acquisitions we've made recently, the Bullseye acquisition in Memphis, where we're seeing the strongest demand is in e commerce distribution. What you're talking about there with those malls, it would clearly be a last stop or a last mile. And I think that there's room for both in terms of the growth in demand from e commerce.
So I don't have much to say on it. But I think that it would be from where we sit, it would be quite difficult to make that work logistically on a large scale.
Interesting. Thank you very much.
Our next question from the line of Himanshu Gupta with Scotiabank. You may proceed. Thank
you and good morning. So just a follow-up, I think you mentioned $100,000,000 of potential acquisitions in Canada. Are there any particular markets you are looking at? And do you now see better risk adjusted returns in Canada versus some of the other markets?
No, I mean, Canada was always on the radar for us strategically, Manju. We did see a very short blip in terms of cap rates because of COVID that has since, I think, recovered strongly. We're seeing that basically across our entire portfolio of target markets, not just in Canada, but the U. S. And Europe.
The demand from an investment perspective for logistics assets, I think in many markets has surpassed pre COVID levels for good reason. But I think we're finding opportunities that fit our strategy well at pricing that makes sense. It's the best way I would characterize it. And our focus really is on the GTA. I think that we would look at potentially Montreal, potentially Vancouver, but right now, I think we have enough in the GTA to keep us busy.
Got it. And then on the $500,000,000 green bond issuance this quarter, how are you planning to do those proceeds? Are there any limitations or restrictions in properties where you can invest this month?
Yes. I'm not sure I caught the second half of the question, but in turn, we're actually quite I think we feel quite bullish and confident on the potential for uses for the green bond proceeds. If you look at what we have acquired over the past 2 years, what we have developed recently and what we are planning to development, we're pretty confident we'll be able to deploy the 500,000,000 dollars towards certified green projects within the next couple of years, which is well within the I guess the timelines of the green bond framework.
I'm sorry. I mean, to mention, I mean, the only restriction would be that the investments must meet the Greenbond framework and how we define eligible green projects. So as long as we obtain the certifications on the either development or the acquisitions that we acquire. For example, the 2 green globes that our Indianapolis development received that is eligible under our Green Bond framework. So the proceeds can be allocated to that.
And recall too that we have a 3 year look back on investments that we've made in the past and 3 years forward.
2 years back, 3
years forward, I think. Yes.
Got it. That's very helpful. And just last question, general question on the safety stock in warehouses. So we keep hearing about this new team. Is that more of a discussion right now or actually on the ground you think tenants are keeping more inventory in warehouses or working towards that?
I'm sorry, I didn't hear the question, Himanshu.
So in terms of we hear from the brokers that the tenants are looking to keep more safety stock in warehouses and probably the warehouse utilization is likely to go up. Some of the tenants will stock more inventory, more safety stock. And I'm just wondering that are you tracking the utilization of the warehouses of the tenants?
I'm not sure we specifically track the utilization ratios of our tenants, but I will tell you what we're seeing I mean, it's you're asking a question during period of lockdowns and COVID. So it is admittedly very recently more difficult for our team to see what's going on behind the doors. And it differs slightly from jurisdiction, but certainly in Europe, it's tough for us again. But we did receive regular and by regular, I mean weekly property inspection reports during this. And I would just say that and in some cases, we were well aware, Amazon being a good example, I would offer that the utilization rates were probably at their highest ever.
A number of our tenants, particularly those in e commerce and distribution, what makes up the majority of our portfolio, were very busy during COVID. So I don't have a particular ratio that I could share with you, but I will tell you that I certainly would agree with the tone that we've seen utilization of our properties among the logistics and e commerce users probably at their highest that they've ever been.
Our next question is from the line of Troy MacLean with BMO. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Just curious on the Texas developments, would you start any of those projects on spec or would you want to pre lease it? And are you targeting any specific tenants such as food or e commerce for those buildings?
For the Texas, it's a good question, Troy. I think if the lease up did not go as well in Indianapolis, I think we were pausing anyways because of the lockdown. But absent the lockdown, I think we would have been I think leasing the Indianapolis, seeing the demand for that product, gave us comfort maybe to NuPho with more spec than we would have before. So I think we are comfortable when the time when it's available to move forward on spec in Dallas just because of location. I mean that location is an 8 minute drive from downtown Fort Worth, 20 minute drive from the airport on the A20.
So we would be, we are going to target e commerce logistics there. It could be multiple users in the building. It could be single tenant. But we won't be in a position to make a decision to move forward with this probably for a number of months into 2021.
And then you mentioned being able to deploy all the proceeds by the end of the year. Would that mostly be on development land or stabilized assets? Or would you is there an opportunity here to find some value add like under leased properties that you could buy and
lease up?
Well, I would think all of the above, remembering that we do have a good piece of land in Houston and now Dallas, we are looking for future development opportunities. We continue to look for the right stabilized assets, and we continue to look for the right value add properties. And it's hard to give you a breakdown because it depends on the opportunity, but we're looking for all 3. But I would think just based on the pipeline we have in front of us, for the remainder of 2020, it will probably be more stabilized assets, some value add and less development land for the remainder of 2020.
Looking a couple of years out, which kind of your target mix for development versus acquisitions? Development seems to be becoming much more important and the yields are a little higher. Do you have a target? Or just you kind of you can see what the market gives you?
Well, I mean, I think as a REIT, you need to be responsible how you're dealing with balance sheet on your how you're dealing with development on your balance sheet. But I am a big believer in the value that development adds, that it adds for unitholders in our portfolio, in our platform. And I think we've kind of built our platform around that. So in time, I would see development being as big or bigger than our acquisition program. I don't know exactly when that will happen.
But certainly, I mean, we do work within the parameters of the capital markets. As a REIT, we can only take so much land on our balance sheet at one time, but we're going to push the limits on that. We're going to incorporate as much development as we responsibly can. So certainly, I think our development program is going to continue to grow.
And then just finally for me. On the acquisition opportunities you're looking at now, would it be fair to say that you're not competing with as many buyer groups as you were before the pandemic started?
I wish I could say that. The answer is no. There's just as many or more buyers. I would say, I think that the deal that we did during COVID was probably the earlier part of the curve, but the curve got awfully steep in the Q2. So there are a number of buyers that are back at the table and there are buyers that are new to the table.
So I mean, we're used to dealing with competition. I think we have the right strategy and approach to acquisitions. So we will certainly find our fair share and close on our fair share of opportunities. But there has been there is no continued drop off in the number of bidders for the right products.
Thank you for your commentary. I'll turn it back now.
Our next question is from the line of Chris Couprie with CIBC. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Just following up a little bit on Troy's line of questioning. Maybe just on the deal flow, you look at the different geographies, would you say that deal flow in each of the markets in terms of that volume of deals that you're seeing is getting closer to pre COVID type of levels? And then with respect to development, would you entertain the idea of partnering with another capital provider to help derisk the development and maybe collect fees?
On the first one, Chris, I think that volume, I would be comfortable saying volume in the U. S. Is quickly approaching pre COVID levels. I would not be surprised to see investment volume for logistics in the U. S.
Be the same as 2019, frankly, seeing where it's going now. In Europe, it has it is still returning to pre COVID levels, not quite there yet. And remember, this is the summer. And when they go pent down in Europe, they really go pent down in the summer. So we'll see if we have a busy fall.
In Canada, it's kind of the same volume. The holders of the right real estate in Canada want to continue to hang on to it. So we don't expect that there will be a major uptick in Canada, but that's not because of a lack of demand, it's just a lack of supply. In terms of capital partners on development, it is something we think about. I think we want to be very selective about any capital partner that we bring in and the timing has to be appropriate for us.
That time is not now, but there may be a point in the future where it makes sense from us from a capital perspective, but we just don't think that, that time is now.
Okay. Understood. And last question for me, just on the fair value changes in the quarter. There's some commentary regarding Austria. I'm just wondering if you can shed some light on that.
No. I mean, we felt I think it's in our MD and A. We did make a lot of fair value major fair value adjustments in the quarter. Obviously, we did for all points because it went from a development project to a fully leased asset. That was a large gain in value, almost CAD20 1,000,000.
So that was substantial. We did take some further smaller write downs on our assets in Europe sorry, in Austria specifically, just because of the size of the market. It was hard for us to really look at markets in the U. S. And Canada and see the fair values move.
We did take a small uptick in the GTA just based on where we're seeing movement in market rents. We did take that in the 2nd quarter as well.
Okay. Thanks a lot.
And Mr. Gore, there are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to you. You may resume with your presentation or closing remarks.
Okay. Well, I just again thank you to everyone for being on the call. I know it's a very busy time and challenging circumstances. So thank you again for being on our call. And to our unitholders, thank you again for your continued trust and support.
Thank you. This does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you all for your participation and kindly ask that you please disconnect your line. Have a great day everyone.