Thank you very much for your participation on this earning calls of Q1 FY2023 Financial Results, ended June 30th, 2023. I am Ikeda, Head of the Corporate Communications, serving as the moderator for today. For today's meeting, you can join either Zoom webinar or live streaming. After our presentation, Q&A session will take place, and the questions are entertained only through the Zoom webinar. In other words, you cannot ask the questions from live streaming. The participants here today is Naoki Okamura, Representative Director, President and CEO, Yoshitsugu Shitaka, the Chief Scientific Officer, Tadaaki Taniguchi, Chief Medical Officer, Claus Zieler, Chief Commercial Officer. These four are participants for today's earning calls, including Q&A, that simultaneous translation in both Japanese and English are provided. For the simultaneous translation, the accuracy is not guaranteed by us.
If you are joined by the Zoom webinar, from the Zoom screen, please select the available language. If you select the original language, you can hear the original voices, not via interpreters. For today's presentation material, that is available on the website of ourself. That is about the material for the earning calls. This material or presentation by representatives for the company and answers and statement by representatives for the company in the Q&A session includes forward-looking statements based on assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to management and subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual financial results may differ materially, depending on the number of factors. They contain information on pharmaceuticals, including compounds under development, but this information is not intended to make any representations or advertisement regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of the products.
Now, the presentation will be started. Okamura-san, please.
Hello, everyone. I'm Naoki Okamura from Astellas Pharma Inc. Thank you very much for joining our FY2023 Q1 financial results announcement meeting out of a very busy schedule today. This is a cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information. As this was explained by Ikeda earlier, I'm going to skip this page. Page 3 is the agenda for today. Starting from the next page, I will explain these topics in this order. On page Q3, I will give you an overview of FY2023 Q1 financial results. Revenue decreased by 2% year-on-year. This is mainly due to the impact of Lexiscan generics. Generics were launched by multiple companies at the timing earlier than we expected. Pricing pressure went up rapidly, resulting in a substantial decrease in our sales. We are assuming that this impact is not temporary, but will be a downside factor throughout the current fiscal year.
On the other hand, Xtandi and Xospata expanded as expected, while Padcev exceeded our expectations. The initial uptake of Veozah, launched in May, was in line with expectations. I will explain our main products on page 6 and 7 in detail. On cost items. SG&A and R&D expenses were both on track. As a result, core operating profit increased 17% year-over-year, including Forex impact. Revenue and core operating profit were behind our expectations in terms of the progress against our full-year forecast, due to the impact of Lexiscan generics I mentioned earlier. On the other hand, core businesses contributing to our future growth progressed steadily. On page five, I will explain FY2023 Q1 financial results. Revenue decreased to JPY 375 billion, down 1.8% year-ovover-year. The progress was 24.7% against the full-year forecast. Core operating profit was JPY 64.9 billion, up by 17.4% year-on-year. The progress was 22.4%.
The progress of both revenue and core operating profit looks a little weak due to the larger impact of erosion by Lexiscan generics than expected. On the other hand, we are expecting Veozah and Padcev sales to expand towards the latter half of the current fiscal year. Accordingly, operating profit is expected to increase towards the latter half of the year as well. You can see the Forex impact on the right-hand side of the table. Revenue was affected positively by JPY 17.5 billion and operating profit by JPY 18.2 billion. This includes the Forex impact of elimination of unrealized profit remaining in the Q1 of FY2022, was JPY 12.8 billion. The bottom half of this page shows our full basis results. In the right bottom of the table, we included other expenses booked in the Q1.
We booked JPY 7.6 billion due to fair value increase of contingent consideration for zolbetuximab because of Forex rate fluctuations. The contingent consideration for zolbetuximab is booked as liabilities in EUR. From the end of FY2022 through the end of FY2023 Q1, the EUR substantially fluctuated towards the lower JPY, which resulted in fair value increase of contingent consideration. In May, we issued a press release about the conclusion of agreement regarding the transfer of a manufacturing plant and business based in Meppel, the Netherlands. As a result, we booked JPY 7.3 billion impairment loss. Mainly due to these two factors, other expenses reached JPY 23.1 billion in the Q1. As a result, operating profit was JPY 45.8 billion, up by 38.2% year-on-year. Profit increased to JPY 33.1 billion, up 33.5% year-on-year.
On page six, I will explain FY2023 Q1 results for main products. First, Xtandi, global sales grew to JPY 174.1 billion, up by 7% year-on-year. Ex-U.S. performance offset the U.S. underperformance. Global progress as a whole is in line with our initial assumptions, even excluding Forex impact. In the United States, progress was below expectations due to higher than expected ratio of PAP, a patient access program to provide drugs for free. On the other hand, volume excluding PAP showed steady growth of 4% year-on-year, so demand increased. In the latter half of the current fiscal year, we are expecting approval of the additional indication M0 CSPC. We are hoping this will bring a potential positive impact to growth sales. Established markets exceeded expectations and contributed the most to the expansion of global sales.
Mainly in Germany, Spain, and Italy, prescription for M1 CSPC continued to grow. Demand substantially increased by 17% year-on-year. We confirmed that there is no clear impact of competitive Xgeva generics as of now. I would like to touch on the profit margin of Xtandi by region once again. In the United States, about half of the sales are paid to Pfizer as co-promotion fees. In ex-U.S. regions, about 10%-20% level royalties, the amount of which increases in line with the sales, are paid under economic conditions. Sales expansion in regions other than the United States contribute more to the overall profit margin improvement. There tends to be more focus on the United States, which is the biggest market, from the perspective of the profit, sales expansion in other regions is also extremely important.
We will continue to focus on initiatives for the entire globe. As for Padcev, global sales increased to JPY 15.2 billion, up by 44% year-on-year, driven by good performance in the United States. We can also expect an upside from our initial forecast globally as a whole. We are expecting sales to increase continuously, also in the Q2 and beyond. In the United States, market penetration is exceeding expectations at a speed faster than expected for the first-line additional indication approved in April. It's well received by physicians. We are expecting further sales increase. In established markets, we are expecting reimbursements to start in the Q2 and beyond in big markets like Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, where we are expecting continuous growth like the United States for the future as well.
By the way, you can find Xtandi and Padcev sales by region on page 21 and 22. Regarding Xospata, global sales increased to JPY 13 billion, up 24% year-over-year. Sales expanded in all launched regions, performing in line with expectations overall. Veozah was launched in the United States in May. Q1 sales were limited with JPY 0.6 billion, but initial uptake is on track. I will explain the details on the next page. On page 7, I will explain the details of Veozah. In our full year forecast, we are expecting full-scale sales growth of Veozah from the Q3 onward. In order to ensure the growth, we are now focusing on market access enhancement and activities for HCPs, are closely monitoring the trends. The left side of this page shows the progress in the Q1. First, on market access.
Generally speaking, it takes three to six monthss until the start of commercial insurance coverage, so the current 15% of lives is on track. Aiming to expand the coverage, we are discussing with payers right now. Payers are requesting for meetings earlier than initially scheduled, showing stronger interest than expected. We will continue to discuss with the payers, and we are expecting coverage by a majority of commercial insurance by the end of the current fiscal year. Next, with regards to our activities for HCPs and patients, up until the Q2, we are not implementing fully branded DTC activities for patients, but rather we are focusing on our activities for HCPs in order to make them fully understand Veozah's safety and efficacy profile, so that they can prescribe the product appropriately to their patients.
Veozah has been included in the VMS treatment guidelines as a recommended drug since June. We hope this will contribute to the enhancement of HCP's awareness and intention to prescribe. We have started sales force information provision activities since June. In just one month of activities, we have been able to reach 40,000 HCPs in person and distributed 70,000 bottles of tablets for seven days as samples. Samples are not captured in the prescription data and are not booked as sales. We are hoping that samples taken by patients will lead to the actual prescription. Including TV commercials, 4 DTC activities for patients are scheduled to start from the Q3 onward. We said that the overall progress so far is on track. We recognize that after looking at the weekly prescription data, some of you may think that the uptake is slow.
This is due to a gap between the prescription data and the actual prescription by physicians, and typical market access issues during the market entry by new products. In the clinical settings, patients prescribed with Veozah by physicians are not covered by insurance plans in some cases. Even when they are covered by insurance, prior authorization may be required for prescription. This prior authorization process takes a certain amount of time. Once authorized, patients can receive Veozah. At that timing, it's finally reflected onto the prescription data. As of the timing of one month after the launch, due to these reasons I just explained, about one fourth of the patients prescribed with Veozah have been able to actually receive Veozah, according to our estimation. As of now, we have confirmed many applications for prior authorization.
We are hoping that authorization will make progress. Many patients will be able to start treatment with Veozah. We are expecting substantial sales growth from the Q3 onward, driven by widespread insurance coverage and 4 DTC activities. We have not changed our full year forecast of JPY 49.3 billion. We will aim to achieve this figure continuously. Next, on page 8, I will explain cost items. Cost of sales decreased substantially year-on-year, as we booked the Forex impact of JPY 12.8 billion related to the elimination of unrealized profits in the Q1 of FY 2022. Cost of sales ratio was as expected. SG&A cost, including, excluding extended U.S. co-promotion fees, increased by 2.1% year-on-year. When Forex impact was excluded, SG&A expenses increased by 7.1% year-on-year.
The progress was 25.5% against the full year forecast. As we mentioned during the FY 2022 financial results announcement meeting, we position FY 2023 as a year to make active investments for future growth. Sales promotion expenses related to Veozah, launched in the United States in May, increased by about JPY 5 billion year on year. On the other hand, we are trying to reduce sales promotion costs related to mature products such as Mirabegron, which resulted in a cost reduction by about JPY 1 billion year on year. As a result, we were able to reduce costs as expected and actively make necessary investments. SG&A costs were in line with our initial forecast. R&D expenditure decreased by 2.7% year on year, and fell by 16% when Forex impact was excluded.
There was a substantial year-over-year decrease due to the booking of one-time expense of JPY 13.1 billion for using a priority review voucher in the Q1 of FY 2022 for the application of Veozah. The progress was 25.7%, in line with our full year forecast. On page 9, let me explain FY 2023 revised full year forecast. No changes have been made to core basis FY 2023 forecast. We plan to reassess our forecast as a whole in the Q2, considering the impact of the Iveric Bio acquisition onto our results. On the other hand, we have made a downward revision of full basis profit.
We are planning to book as other expenses, about JPY 20 billion, one-time expenses related to organizational restructuring on a global scale, including the review of Japan commercial structure, as we announced in a press release today. We have booked, in the Q1, JPY 7.3 billion impairment loss related to the Meppel plant and business transfer, which we didn't factor in at the time of our full year forecast. This transaction is dominating euro, so it's subject to the impact of Forex fluctuation every quarter. We are expecting about JPY 7 billion loss. Mainly due to these factors, we have made a downward revision of full basis profit. Full basis operating profit is expected to decrease from the initial forecast of JPY 288 billion by JPY 29 billion to reach JPY 259 billion.
We are expecting profit to decrease from the initial forecast of JPY 227 billion by JPY 23 billion to reach JPY 204 billion. Slide 10. Let me explain our, our efforts to achieve sustainable growth. On slide 11, I would like to explain about key events expected in 2023 for extended and key strategic products. The progress made in the past three months is shown in red.
For Xtandi, we've submitted a supplemental NDA for M0 CSPC, no metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, based on the EMBARK study in the U.S. in June. For zolbetuximab , the application for gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma was submitted in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and China, partially ahead of the schedule that we had. The U.S. application was accepted for priority review in July, the PDUFA date was decided as January 12, 2024. Veozah was approved by the U.S. FDA in May. As you see at the bottom of the table, avacincaptad pegol, or ACP, was newly added to the pipeline following the acquisition of Iveric Bio. Details will be explained later in another slide. Other updates are listed outside of this chart. Xtandi and Padcev data presentation will be explained on subsequent slides.
As for Veozah, positive top line results were obtained from the Phase 3b DAYLIGHT trial. These results will provide additional data to support the Health Technology Assessment or HTA and reimbursement dossier in Europe. Regarding , the Xospata detailed data from the Phase 3 MORPHO study in maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was presented at the EHA. Although the primary endpoint was not met for the cohort as a whole, a subsequent subgroup analysis showed results suggestive of efficacy in patients with MRD, or measurable residual disease. We are currently discussing the next steps on future development and submission. We will provide an update when further progress is made. On page 12, I will discuss the EMBARK trial data for enzalutamide Xtandi presented at AUA at the end of April.
The data from the EMBARK study of enzalutamide Xtandi presented at the AUA meeting at the end of April, are described on page 12. In this study, the patients with M0 CSPC at high risk of biochemical recurrence were treated with either placebo or enzalutamide in combination in leuprolide or enzalutamide alone. The graph shows the results of the primary endpoint, metastasis-free survival, or MFS, comparing the enzalutamide combination arm to the placebo combination arm. The MFS was statistically significantly improved with enzalutamide combination therapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.042, or 58% reduction in risk of disease progression or death compared to placebo. Xtandi has demonstrated a high level of efficacy in clinical trials in each stage of prostate cancer, from the most advanced M1 CRPC to M1 CSPC.
The results of the EMBARK study for earlier stages of prostate cancer show the result of a high usefulness, consistent with that of previous studies. On page 13, I will discuss the data on Padcev in head and neck cancer presented at ASCO in June. As shown on the left side of the slide, head and neck cancers are known for their high prevalence and poor prognosis. Advanced head and neck cancer is medically treated mainly with chemotherapy. Currently, PD-1 and 1 inhibitors are approved as second-line therapy, but the objective response rate, or ORR, reported previously is ranged from 13%-18%, indicating a high unmet medical need. Nectin-4, the target molecule of Padcev, is reported to be expressed in 59%-86% of head and neck cancers.
The EV-202 trial is a phase 2 study evaluating the anti-tumor activity of Padcev in a variety of solid tumors other than urothelial carcinoma. As you see on the right side of slide, we presented the results of the study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Padcev monotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced head and neck cancer. The ORR was 23.9%, which is promising in second or later line setting, where high response rates have been difficult to achieve in the past. The safety profile was consistent with consistent with the previous results, and no new signals were observed. Based on these results, we are currently considering how to proceed for the head and neck cancer development. We are discussing a future direction of the second or later line treatment as well.
We will inform you when a specific direction is decided. We are also planning to add a new cohort of combination with the pembrolizumab to the EV-202 trial for the first-line treatment. We will update the data and our future steps for cancers other than head and neck cancer at the appropriate time after the analysis results are available. Slide 14 provides an update on the recently completed acquisition of Iveric Bio. First, at the top, this is the post-acquisition organization. The President will be Pravin U. Dugel. He's an ophthalmologist with outstanding expertise and had served as President prior to the acquisition. He has extensive experience as a clinical principal investigator, and has been asked by many companies, including global pharmaceutical companies, to advise them. He's versed with drug development as well.
He's also highly respected by the colleagues in his specialty, and has a long list of accomplishments and academic societies enough to have built an extensive network in the medical community. As shown in the upper right corner of the slide, Iveric Bio will continue to lead ACP-related activities for the time being, while Astellas will provide support as needed to ensure smooth progress in dealing with the authorities in launching the product. Iveric Bio has a senior leadership team with a significant ophthalmology experience, and which we have a commercial function with a highly specialized personnel for rapid, rapid post-approval ramp-up. The field sales team will cover a wide range of local referral networks, including the retinal specialists who will administer the drug and the laboratories to provide the test. The bottom half of the slide shows a timeline of key events for ACP.
I will explain the new events indicated in red. In July, based on the results of pivotal GATHER study, we did submission in the EU following the United States. In September, we expect to receive top-line results for 24-month data from the GATHER2 trial, which will include monthly data for up to 24 months, as well as data from bimonthly dosing starting at month 13. Finally, as the PDUFA date in the US just in front of us, we have recently received a number of inquiries regarding the likelihood of approval. As shown on the left side of the figure, the GATHER study is being conducted based on the protocol agreed with FDA, in which primary endpoint recommended by the FDA as clinical meaningful is adopted.
Of course, approval is not 100% guaranteed. The results have met the primary endpoints agreed upon in advance with the FDA. We see no reason to believe that the ACP will not be approved at this time. We hope to have good news for you in the near future. From here, page 15, I would like to explain progress in focus area approach. Status of projects and clinical trials that have been updated in the past 3 months are shown in red. In the primary focus immune oncology, ASP2138 was granted Orphan Drug Designation by the FDA for the treatment of gastric and GEJ cancer. This is a bispecific antibody targeting Claudin 18.2 and CD3. It is expected to be a successor to zolbetuximab. For ASP7317 in blindness and regeneration, 2 patients were treated in June after the resumption of clinical trials.
The project team's proactive efforts to accelerate the enrollment of patients, such as increasing the number of clinical trial sites, are bearing fruit. We will continue to take steps to accelerate the process and aim to identify our POC as soon as possible. Page 16, that explains collaborations, in a primary focus, targeted protein degradation. As shown in the middle of the figure, protein degrader is composed of target protein binder and E3 binder, and a linker connecting them. By changing the target protein binder, it can be applied to various targets and diseases. Also, by changing the E3 binder, it is possible to improve the specificity and duration of action to enhance the function of the protein degradation. In addition to the collaboration with Fimecs, which was introduced at the R&D meeting last December, we have recently entered into new collaboration with PeptiDream and Kelun-Biotech.
PeptiDream has proprietary technology to create special cyclic peptides with a high binding capability and selectivity for target molecules. This technology can be used to target a wide variety of targets that are difficult to bind to when with conventional small molecules, and is expected to lead to the creation of new protein degraders. Fimecs has an innovative technology platform for the creation of novel protein degrader. Through this collaboration, we aim to create protein degrader for multiple targets, including cell cycle proteins. Fimecs also has expertise in the creation of novel E3 binders, which we expect will be utilized to create the new generation of innovative protein degrader. We will continue our collaboration with Fimecs, which has unique E3 binders, and create innovative protein degrader for various targets by appropriately leveraging the strength of each company.
We will continue to proactively invest management resources into collaboration and others to achieve a leading position in protein degrader. Page 17 at the end, I would like to summarize the progress made in the Q1 of the current fiscal year toward the achievement of CSP2021. The impact of our acquisition of Iveric Bio has not been incorporated into the current focus shown here. We will explain this point at the announcement of Q2 financial results, so please wait for a while. Regarding Xtandi and strategic products, there is a lot of progress, such as Veozah launch. The initial upticks is in line with expectations. Sales of Xtandi, ASP7317, Xospata increased. Xovataxmac was filed globally. In addition, through the acquisition of Iveric Bio, we acquired ACP, which is expected to become a new revenue pillar for us.
We have steadily developed each primary focus, including targeted protein degrader, in line with our strategy. Initiatives for optimization of cost structure is proceeding on track. In FY 2023, we will proactively promote investments and initiatives for the future, and position the year as turning point to ensure growth in FY 2024 and beyond. We will continue to aim to achieve our full year profit targets and the targets of the CSP 2021. That is all for now. Thank you so much for your attention.
That's all as a presentation. We now would like to entertain questions from the audience. You can ask questions only through Zoom Webinar. You cannot ask questions through live streaming. If you have a question, please press the Raise Hand button at the bottom of the Zoom screen. If you're joining from your smartphone, if you tap Details, you will see the, the Raise Hand button, so please press it. MC is going to name you, so please unmute yourself on your screen. Please mention your name and affiliation, and then ask your question. Today, we have Claus, as Chief Commercial Officer. As I said at the beginning, on the menu of the Zoom screen, if you select the original language, you can listen to the original sound without going through the simultaneous translation.
You can change the language or sound at this time, if you want. Questions, please. Thank you for waiting. Citigroup, Mr. Yamaguchi, please. Can you hear me? Yamaguchi speaking.
Yes, we can hear you. I have two questions. First of all, regarding ACP, I'm looking forward to August 19th. As you know, there is a leading product ahead of you. There are intraocular inflammation, although it's a rare event. Of course, it's a different drug, but it may be due to the procedure according to some. How do you see this issue? In order to prevent these issues from happening for ACP, there may be a lot of uncertainties, but I'd like to hear your comment. This is my first question. Thank you very much.
In principle, it's about a competitive product, so we'd like to refrain from commenting on their product. As far as we have captured the information, and as far as we can share, Taniguchi is going to explain.
I'd like to comment and respond to your question. In our position, for the time being, safety for ACP, we have the database for ACP safety, and we are discussing with FDA as well. Regarding the other company's product, there is adverse events, which are issues such as retinal vasculitis or retinal occlusive vasculitis or hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis, which are reported. Looking at our database, in GATHER1 and GATHER2 studies, we don't see such adverse events, if we look at our database. That's the situation right now. In terms of the safety concern, we cannot respond from that perspective as of now, but PDUFA date is approaching. In our discussions with FDA, as soon as possible, we'd like to obtain the approval for this product, which we'd like to concentrate on.
At the same time, in the post-marketing settings, the safety is extremely important, so we will do our best as we proceed going forward. Thank you very much. The second, for Veozah, just like you mentioned, the actual is different from the IQVIA data, but in order to interpret that, you gave us that information. Thank you very much. Still, I have a question. The initial approach that you thought about is 40,000. 40,000 patients you are able to achieve. According to your material, there is about 100,000 early adopters, and you provide the information thoroughly to them. That's the first point. This 40,000, that is... I believe that the sufficient number, and for the early adapter adopters, the information is sufficiently provided. What do you think about this situation?
70 bottles means there are 70,000 prescriptions, it costs about JPY 50,000 per bottle, the amount is quite large, and all that is going to be replaced with the prescription. What will be the timing that actually you come up with a revenue from this? Thank you for the question. First of all, 40,000. If my memory serves me right, by the end of September, 65,000 is the number of the target to be contacted. In June, just 1 month, 40,000 doctors we were able to meet, meaning that this uptake speed is quite high. In other words, the information is provided in a very accelerated manner to those specialists. The bottles, in other words, samples? This is different from ordinary bottles.
One week portion of the tablets are within one bottle and 70,000 bottles in total. If I multiply 550 on this, the calculation is not right. Just like, as I mentioned first, usage of the sample is quite, quite important to experience the benefit of this drug, so that this drug can be actually prescribed. That is something we are expecting. In this perspective, this as an entry usage of sample is something we are highly expecting. However, as it's been explained, the insurance coverage has to be there. Otherwise, even the sample phase is finished and go to the prescription, and a prescription is made, but the drug cannot be get given or gained.
Rather than the, this, provisioning of the samples, enhancement of the, insurance coverage is the fact that is contributing to the actual sales. That is the, answer from me. Claus, you're the specialist. Do you like to make, would you like to make some additional comment on this point?
Can you hear me?
Yes.
Okamura-san, you've covered it very, very well. We are very much encouraged by the interest in the marketplace, both from the HCP side, from the payer side, and from the patient side. Covering 40,000 physicians in one month, we started first of June, is actually a very, very speedy coverage. We're very pleased with the result.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Mr. Hashiguchi from Daiwa Securities, please.
Hashiguchi speaking. Thank you for your time. I also have a question about ACP and Veozah. Regarding ACP, as Mr. Dr. Taniguchi said, there is a competitive product ahead of you, I think what you said is very similar to what the competitor is saying. As of now, in our clinical studies, you don't see these events, but there are multiple such reports, the cause is not so clear, doctors are careful about prescription right now, in many cases. Regarding ACP, even if you get the approval, where is the concern of adverse events? You have to communicate the cause of the adverse events to the physicians. Otherwise, doctors will become very careful about the prescription of HCP, that situation may continue for some time.
Regarding safety, how are you going to communicate this once you're able to get the approval? What's your plan?
Thank you for your question. What should I say? What's not happening at the ACP and what shall we do if it happens? It's very difficult to say, because it's not happening. As Hashiguchi-san said, it's a product from a competitor with a similar mechanism, having adverse events. It may happen that doctors will become careful about prescribing our product. In the real-world settings, whether a similar adverse event will occur or not, by using a product, we have to monitor. To eliminate a concern, I, of the physicians, there is no other way. It may be procedural issues, and there can be other reasons behind.
Iveric experts will use their network of retinal specialists to think about the procedures to prevent adverse events from occurring. They also have their experiences as a physician, so they will take every possible measures. It's not something to prevent, as it could occur, but they are going to see whether such an event could occur for HCP. For Veozah insurance coverage, to what extent it is expanded and how it's going to be expanded, that is touched upon. The impact onto the business performance, growth to net, growth to net, how it would be? That is going to be quite important. There are many payers where the conditions haven't been really fixed.
This growth to net, is it likely to be gapped compared to your expectation, or it is in line with your expectation? Would you please share that point? Regarding growth to net, basically, we are not making any comments. Therefore, I would not make any comment. Claus, is there anything you would like to say a word about this? Claus, do you have any comment?
Yeah, I just need to unmute every time, so there's always a delay. We are approaching the discussions very constructively. As I mentioned to you, payer interest is very high. We are proceeding, on the one hand, as speedily as necessary, on the other hand, as carefully as necessary, because as we know, these negotiations are always a balance between speed and the discounts that you settle on. So far, as I mentioned to you, we've been very happy with payer interest. We are fully on track with the payer coverage the way we imagined it. I think that's all, all we can say at this point.
As Okamura-san said, we, we expect the majority of payers to have their lives covered by the end of the fiscal year.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Next, is this UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities, Ms. Kumagai, please.
Kumagai speaking. Can you hear me?
Yes, we can hear you. Thank you.
Regarding avacincaptad pegol, Iveric Bio's commercial team has about 90 people, according to the material presented for the acquisition. How many are salespeople? Is that enough to cover specialists? Do you have a plan to increase the headcount? Thank you for the question. We are not disclosing the details of the headcount, but already until the PDUFA date, it's just three weeks to go until the PDUFA date. We shouldn't think about a plan to increase the headcount from now, but rather, with the headcount we have, we have the assumption to cover the necessary physicians. That's the structure right now. Next, about Veozah. I expected this DC would be started much earlier, but it will be 3rd quarter and afterwards. That's because insurance coverage matter.
After samples are provided, what is actually the feedback you receive from the patients? Thank you for the questions. For the first question, first of all, the HCPs need to have a better understanding about this drug. Therefore, before their good understanding, those who look at the DTCPA campaigns start to talk about the products with the HCP is the worst-case scenario for us. First, we would like to focus on the communication and also approach to the HCPs first. Of course, within this 3 months, insurance coverage has to be proceeded, otherwise, even the patients come to the doctors and the prescription is written, but insurance side reject that, that is meaningless.
Therefore, at the same time, we proceed the market access, that is important. However, focusing on HCP first is very important. Next, feedback from the patients. I don't have any feedback, but Claus, for the patients, do you have information about feedback from those who, who actually use it as a product or use it as samples?
We don't have statistically significant feedback that we can report on today. We have anecdotal feedback, which is positive, but nothing that would be statistically represented.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you very much. Goldman Sachs, Mr. Ueda, please.
Ueda from Goldman Sachs Securities. I also have a question about ACP first. Regarding safety, when you think of the future potential in the labeling, what we should focus on in the labeling? Could you please explain? Also, the initial uptake, given the situation, there can be a mild penetration. Do you have any image about the uptake?
Thank you for your question. First, about the label. With the discussions with the regulators by now, as far as we can share, Taniguchi is going to explain, and then after commercialization and the initial uptake after commercialization, that is going to be explained by Claus later, as far as we can. Regarding the label, what kind of discussions we have had with FDA by now? As far as we can share, I'd like to explain.
As you know, ACP filing is based on GATHER1 and GATHER2. There are 2 studies as a basis for filing our submission. Right now, needless to say, we are now in the final stage, including the label. What contents would be included, are also being discussed. In reality, GATHER1 and GATHER2, primary endpoints and other designs were agreed in advance with FDA as we proceeded. For the 2 studies, primary endpoint were achieved. Discussions are ongoing without any major issue. As for safety, based on these two studies, we are disclosing the data. That's the assumption. As soon as possible, we'd like to deliver this drug to the patients as soon as possible. Claus-san?
Yes, I believe your question was about the launch preparations. Did I understand that correctly?
You know, kind of how you, how you start the, you know, ramp up of the commercialization.
Yeah. We met with the Iveric team just after the closing date, and I must say we were very satisfied with their preparations of the launch. Both in terms of the physicians they want to cover. They have clearly identified the retinal physicians that, that do the administration of the product. And, and, the material is ready, the different payer, and, and, trade schemes are ready. We were very, very satisfied with the preparation of the launch. Then it is, I think, after the PDUFA date, very traditional, contacting the physicians to explain the avasopasem product profile, the details of administration, preparing the patient to come in, the intervals of injection.
All the details that need to be communicated to the physicians before they can start administering the product. In that sense, as I said, sales force materials, payers, all the different elements are there. We expect a speedy ramp-up, ramp-up, and the, the, the preparation was at a very high level from what we could see.
Thank you very much.
Let me move on to the next question. That is about Padcev. First line is approved and the progress after that. Concerning the number of the patient, I think you can accelerate it further. You can accelerate it further, but according to your presentation, the current progress level is better than the plan. The market for this is extremely large, and at what point of time do you think you can gain further more growth? Current status and also future perspective, would you please give us your opinions? You, as Padcev first line, current status and the future perspective, Claus-san, please share with us your opinion.
Yes. Sorry, I'm-
Yes.
Can you hear me now?
Yeah.
Yeah. Thank you for your question. As you stated correctly, the performance exceeded our expectations with the launch of the so-called Cohort K data in first line patients. These are first line cisplatin-ineligible patients, so it's not the full first line patient population. Growth surprised us. We're very, very pleased with the progress that we've made. It is important to note that we have another study that will enlarge the patient population to the full first line patient population in combination with another drug. As we proceed, we will be able to target the entire first line population.
In the Cohort K, in the cisplatin-ineligible patient population that we're targeting now, take-up has been faster than expected, and we expect that to continue throughout FY 2023.
Thanks, Claus.
Thank you so much. That's all from me.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Morgan Stanley, MUFJ Securities, and Mr. Muroka, please. Hello, Muroka from Morgan Stanley. Thank you very much. Can you hear me?
Yes, we can hear you. Thank you. Iveric. Acquisition is going to be reflected onto your guidance or plan 3 months later. I know that, it's a huge amount goodwill and also depreciation could be as much as JPY 50 billion in my view. I don't want to ask you to give me that particular figure, there would be many M&A transactions for the future. Corporate profit definition could be changed, you can exclude intangible or fixed assets to start a new operating profit model. Have you considered such a way?
Thank you for your question.
We are not, it doesn't mean that we are not discussing such a possibility. I am serving as CFO, but I'm in an interim position, so I shouldn't talk too much in that capacity. Whether we change the definition or not, wise investors and analysts could have a calculator discount on their tabletop. To understand the development of our main business, we use the core operating profit definition. Changing of the definition would not mean much, and that's based on my gut feeling. If there is a big M&A transaction, which could be just once in 10 years or so, but depreciation demand could fluctuate. No, that's not the case. I don't think it's so important.
In our CSP 2021, we try to achieve it. Compared to what we are discussing, in essence, whether to change the definition or not, that's not so important, honestly speaking, in my view. Thank you very much. Nominal and the substantial areas, achieving the core operating profit targets, in CSP, if you try to achieve it, based on the value, this depreciation can be very cumbersome. After depreciation and amortization, we can still achieve the FY 2025 goals. If the Veozah is going to sell well, no problem, but you're going to proceed with confidence, correct? For such details, when we announce the results for the Q2, I will explain. After M&A transaction and a big amortization or depreciation, we shouldn't just give up.
Please give us some more time so that we can consider. Thank you.
Now, another question is about the Veozah, the way of thinking it. From the third party's perspective, every week, weekly prescription data by the third vendor, is going to be the critical information for us. Around what time in the future do you think that current number is going to parallel to actual number booked by yourself? For example, 3 months later, the actual number you calculated is going to be consistent with the third party's information. Probably, you have some assumption about that. In order to look at the situation, such information is going to be quite helpful.
Well, I'm not a specialist enough to give you some tips here. Claus might have some comment on this as well, but whichever case, it's been only four months since launch. I think it's not so meaningful to stick to that information. I don't know if that is the right way to say as a person who are doing business, but there might be some more data be available, and at that time, what would be the relationship of this number and that number, that kind of discussion might be viable. This as the comment setting the scene for you, Claus. Could you make some comment? IQVIA prescription data and our considering actual demand and actual sales, the relationship, is there any magic that we can see a clear picture of the relationship between these two?
Yeah, there's usually not too much magic in life, but I understand your question. Let me put your question into perspective. The full impact of the inflection curve of Veozah, we will see when we start activating the direct-to-consumer campaigns. That is when we expect women, in response to the direct-to-consumer campaigns, to consult a physician. At that point, the physicians will be fully informed on Veozah, then we also have the payer coverage that will have progressed at that point. Then we see relevant number of scripts. Yeah. That ramp-up is what we expect to start in Q3, and that is when we get the trend rates that tell us whether our expectations are met or not.
At this point in time, in this 1st quarter, where we've only been really promoting for the month of June, but even theQ2 , the script levels are going to be low. Yes, we can debate about IQVIA reflecting correctly or not, but it's not going to give us what you're looking for. What you're looking for is the inflection curve. Is it where we expect it to be, or is it not where we expect it to be? Unfortunately, we'll have to wait until DTC campaigns kick in in Q3, until we have that information. I think it's probably more prudent to wait until we have that picture, rather than go into the relative script levels of IQVIA reported versus our estimations at the low levels of scripts that we see today.
Thanks, Claus.
I hope that answers your question.
Yes. Thank you very much. That's all from me.
Thank you very much. Next, Schroder Investment Management. Sato-san, please. Sato from Schroder.
I have two questions. First, full base profit is revised downward. You are going to implement the organizational restructuring after paying 1-time expense of JPY 20 billion. What is your to-be situation you'd like to achieve after spending that money? Next, what about the status of the hiring of the CFO? Are you able to hire and find a good person as new CFO by the end of the current fiscal year?
Thank you for your question. Regarding your first question, you're talking about the situation in Japan for which we issued a press release.
For details, we are not disclosing the details and what is going to be the target to support their career. What is going to be the target population for career change support program? We are not going to disclose it yet. Well, we had an early retirement plan before. The, the level and the size is going to be similar to that one in doing financial calculations. What we'd like to do, Claus may explain more later on. The conventional type of having branches and sales offices in different regions in Japan, allocating MRs to have frequent detailing or for mature products as well. That has been the sales activities. We have such products appropriate for such a model, but we are now beginning to change to different types of portfolio.
Where we should make a big change, that is the issue all the time. Even now, we have Suglat. Suglat requires sales reps. You may say so, but we are considering a variety of things. We have a lot of assumptions. Are we going to change at the very last minute? Even though the product has become mature, but while it's used in market, are we going to change the way we do business in organization or in the market? We are aiming to achieve our targets by FY 2025, in CSP2021, and 2023 should be a turning point. In terms of the headcount, it's going to decrease, and those who remain and stay in the company, how they are going to engage in sales activities for the future?
What kind of tools, what kind of technologies, and what kind of digital tools they are going to use to have a more efficient and effective interaction with the customers? It's not just about Japan, but this is what we are considering globally. Particularly in terms of the big difference compared to what we have done before, Japan has a big difference that's resulting in the measures we are thinking about. It's not going to be a mere reduction in the headcount, but rather, it's not just going to be the reduction, but those who stay and remain will engage in activities not the same as the conventional MR activities. It's going to be a small size to select a group of people who would stay. Claus may comment later.
As for CFO, as I said, at a previous meeting, the requirements are very high for us, so we cannot say that there are many candidates, but we have a few specific candidates we have been able to identify by now. We cannot commit to a particular timing, but not far away into the future, we'd be able to share the information with you. Thank you very much. Claus-san, I'd like to listen to him, JPY 20 billion would be required, not just for Japan, but also for global organization as well. You have certain ideas. Could you explain as well? Yes. The balance, the most of the JPY 20 billion will be used for Japan. We are not going to do something major globally. Having said so, one of the highlights today is Lexiscan.
There are generics in the United States and sales force covering hospital, what shall they do? We do have such an issue we have to consider in established markets and international markets, in commercial pipelines. At a slightly different timing, we'll make progress. Accordingly, we are changing organizations in response, and also focusing on our regions. We had management styles, but we are changing to a global management styles, and the layers are which increased. How we can reduce the number of layers to go into a flat organization model, that's another thing we have to consider this time.
Thank you very much.
Claus?
Yes, thank you, and thank you for your question. Okamura-san accurately described the situation of what we're trying to achieve. This is the result of a portfolio review that we did in our Japan portfolio. We identified a tighter focus on priority products and the combination of face-to-face and other channels that would optimally serve our customers. As you, as you know, the customers nowadays use a number of channels to get information on products, not only the traditional MR visit model. We want to serve our customers that way.
That means building the right building blocks between the human element on the commercial side, on the medical side, and then the, the, the digital channels that, that doctors also use today, from, from email to, to webinars, and, and orchestrating that in a seamless fashion. That's what we're trying to achieve specifically in the Japanese commercial organization. It does apply worldwide. As you know, digital channels has been ongoing for a long, long time. This is not a new topic. What we are realizing is that with COVID and with the maturity of some products, some of these trends have accelerated. Specifically in Japan, there's a good opportunity now to reset the organization in, in, in, in that seamless face-to-face and digital combined way of reaching the customer.
That then impacts certain roles in the organization which exist today, and that is what you see in the restructuring costs that we've put into the full profit picture.
Very clear. Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Thank you so much. Credit Suisse Securities, Mr. Haruta, please.
Haruta speaking. Can you hear me?
Yes.
2 questions about avasopasem. In the presentation material, you mentioned about the submission in EU or Europe. Usually, in the past, the EU development and the sales was under the consideration, but for this, are you going to use your own personnel to do the development or the sales of this product in EU?
Thank you for the question. Iveric and Astellas , would it be the way to think or not? That's one point for the discussion. Within Astellas, of course, a non-US organization is available. Regulatory affairs and medical affairs, part of the medical affairs, they can also work for the European business. When it comes to ophthalmology or the specialists of the retina, retina specialist, within Astellas, we don't have any particular persons who have the good network with them. If we hire or use them as Astellas, we hire new person as Astellas, well, we have to think about it. We have to come up with the some particular position for that as well.
I didn't mention much about the non-US market situation, because we wanted to see if we could really submit or not. We didn't mention much about the sales organizations or other organization in other countries. Of course, if the product is good, we would like to provide that to the patients. Yes, we've been thinking about it for a while. Thank you.
Thank you so much. Secondly, regarding a procedure, there were procedural issues and also the performance of the product issue for the sales. For the competitive product, when the doctors bring the product into the syringe for the intravitreal injection, it may cause the problem. In your manufacturing process, it's a prefilled syringe, and no such issues are going to occur. For your avasopasem, what kind of a risk you may foresee? Could you explain?
Thank you for your question. Today, we don't have experts, so I don't think we may be able to give you useful information. This is what happening with the competitive product and what is the cause. I don't think it's meaningful to discuss this in detail. I don't want to comment very much, but Taniguchi may have some useful information, so I'd like to ask him.
Thank you very much. As for the procedure, the difference is, for example, a needle, when you a needle for the injection and the vial will be supplied, the needle from the vial, Iveric and Astellas product, we are going to supply those. There are small details, differences, in small details. The difference in the products, C3 targeting is the competitor, we target C5. That's the difference in terms of the target and also the modalities, that's also different. Aptamer is ours, and the competitor's is different. There are such differences in reality. How they would be linked to the results, we don't know yet. There are differences. What we can do is to make doctors administer this product correctly and appropriately to the patients.
We need education regarding the details of the procedure and safety management, and also safety information must be captured so that they can address it appropriately every time. We will do our best. That would result in a good relationship of trust with physicians and patients. Medical and commercial would work together to create such a situation.
Understood. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Next, Nikkei Newspaper, Mr. Kurose, please.
Thank you. Kurose from Nikkei Newspaper. Thank you very much. I just one question. That's about the introduction of this career change support program. The number and are not disclosed, but about what % of overall medical reps are here in Japan? Also, the sales activities are changing with the introducing of digital tools. What about the background of this system introduction? The digital usage is enhanced, or the business activities are changed. What's the background of this?
Thank you for the question. First of all, the size, as has been mentioned, when we did the earlier retirement system in the past, the size is almost the same as the numerics and current MR numbers that comes into the denominator. Probably, I believe you have a knowledge, so you can do the calculation on your own. Just like you mentioned, the technical advancement around the time of the COVID pandemic, we were not able to see the doctors, but still we had to provide the information, we had to collect the information. Concerning that, the way of doing the sales activities will be changed now toward the future. Another point is that our product portfolio itself is changing.
In the past, we needed to have the contact with the customers, but rather, further advanced customer interaction is more necessary for selling the current products and future products, so there are such changes impacting.
Thank you very much. Understood quite well. Thank you very much. IR side, comment: We have MRs here in Japan with a number of 1,650.
Thank you for the information.
We are running over a bit, but we'd like to take one more question. Mizuho Securities, Tsuzuki-san, please.
Thank you for the time. I am Tsuzuki. Can you hear me?
Yes, we can hear you.
Thank you. I have one question about Iveric and PROTAC. First, about Iveric. Because of Apellis product, Iveric, Iveric, you have more interactions with FDA in person and PROTAC. You work with PeptiDream and Codagenix, but do you have any outlook for Pancreas or 308?
First, about Iveric FDA interaction. For Iveric, Taniguchi is going to respond as far as you can.
As I touched on earlier, August 19th is the PDUFA date. That's the target. More interaction because of the safety issue. Setting that aside, we have very frequent interactions with FDA.
We are now in the final stage. It's not increasing because of the safety issue, according to my understanding. We will continue to have close discussions with FDA so that we can deliver this drug to the patient as soon as possible. That's how the team is working on. My second question. TDP, our focus approach, basic way of thinking is as follows: Biology and modality combination, and in which patients, it's better to proceed, we will make such a decision, and flagship would go into a clinical stage. We get a POC for the clinical, and then the others will come into the clinical stage. That's our basic thinking.
If you don't get the POC for ASP3082, it's difficult to think of everything will go into the clinical stage, but Shitaka, in charge of research or science, is going to respond. Thank you for the question. In December last year, we had the meeting. The situation has not changed since. Regarding ASP3082, as planned, dose escalation study is now ongoing. Pancreas, we have to look at the situation of the competitors. As we announced before, we are aiming for IND within FY 2023. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. We mentioned 1,650 in the commercial structure, but it's not the sales reps, but it's 1,650 members in the entire commercial organization.
There are some more people who would like to ask questions. It's the time. With this, we would like to close today's earnings call. Thank you very much for your participation.