Welcome to the Equinix First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Also, today's conference is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the call over to Katrina Rymill, Vice President of Relations. You may begin.
Thank you, Jennifer. Good afternoon, and welcome to today's conference call. Before we get started, I'd like to remind everyone that some of the statements that we'll be making today are forward looking in nature and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may vary significantly from those statements and may be affected by the risks we identified in today's press release and those identified in our filings with the SEC, including our most recent Form 10 ks filed on February 22, 2019. Equinix assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or comment on forward looking statements made on this call.
In addition, in light of Regulation Fair Disclosure, it is Equinix's policy not to comment on its financial guidance during the quarter unless it is done through an explicit public disclosure. In addition, we will provide non GAAP measures on today's conference call. We provide a reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and a list of the reasons why the company uses these measures in today's press release on the Equinix IR page at www.equinix.com. We have made available on the IR page of our website a presentation designed to accompany this discussion, along with certain supplemental financial information and other data. We'd also like to remind you that we post important information about Equinix in the IR page from time to time and encourage you to check our website regularly for the most current available information.
With us today are Charles Meyers, Equinix's CEO and President Keith Taylor, Chief Financial Officer. Following our prepared remarks, we'll be taking questions from sell side analysts. In the interest of wrapping this call up in an hour, we'd like to ask these analysts to limit any following questions to just one. At this time, I'll turn the call over to Charles.
Thank you, Katrina. Good afternoon, and welcome to our Q1 earnings call. We had a great start to the year, delivering our best Q1 ever, including the largest revenue step up in our history and our 2nd best net bookings quarter, reflecting strong customer demand and lower churn. Our bookings span more than 3,000 customers with cross border bookings up substantially year over year. We processed over 4,000 deals in the quarter, highlighting the diversity and high volume nature of our retail colocation business and the scale we built across our entire go to market and customer support engine.
During the quarter, we also announced adjustments to our org structure to globalize our operating model, scale our business and execute with increased velocity against the growing opportunity for Equinix as a strategic platform on which customers architect their digital business. We moved 3 company veterans into new roles, including concentrating all of our customer facing functions into a single global organization under Karl Strohmeyer, enabling us to provide consistent execution and deliver increased value as a trusted advisor to the businesses undergoing digital transformation. As depicted on Slide 3, revenues for Q1 were $1,360,000,000 up 11% year over year, adjusted EBITDA was up 12% year over year and AFFO was meaningfully ahead of our expectations. Our market leading interconnection franchise is performing well, with revenues continuing to outpace colocation, growing 12% year over year as the cloud ecosystem continues to scale. These growth rates are all on a normalized and constant currency Penetration in lighthouse accounts increased nearly 50% of the Fortune 500 and 35% of the Global 2000, showcasing the expanding opportunity as we deepen our reach into the enterprise.
We are now the market leader in 16 out of the 24 countries in which we operate, and we're expanding our platform with 32 projects announced across 27 markets with Q1 openings in Frankfurt, Hong Kong, London, Paris and Shanghai. With regard to our hyperscale initiative, we are now in the final stages of discussions with a short and highly attractive list of potential financing partners. And we expect to announce our first JV in EMEA in Q2 with a collection of both stabilized and development assets. We continue to see strong customer demand and lease up for our London 10 and Paris 8 assets is tracking ahead of expectations. We remain highly confident that the JV structure will allow us to extend our cloud leadership while mitigating the strain of hyperscale development on our balance sheet.
We'll provide additional details when we announce the transaction, but fully expect that the JV structure will deliver significant strategic value and solid returns, all with minimal impact on our P and L in 2019. Shifting to interconnection. We now have over 341,000 interconnections and continue to add at a rapid clip. In Q1, we added an incremental 7,400, including 1900 virtual connections. We added more interconnections year over year than the rest of the top 10 competitors combined.
For our Internet exchange platform, we're seeing strength in the new EMEA and Latin American markets with IX peak traffic up 20% year over year. ECX Fabric, our SDN enabled interconnection service, now has over 1500 customers and saw strong growth from enterprise ads. In Q1, we completed the full globalization of our ECX Fabric, enabling customers for the first time to establish on demand network connections between the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Our vision is to continue to evolve platform Equinix into a broader platform that interconnects and integrates global businesses at the digital edge. Expanding our capabilities at the edge is critical for our service provider customers looking to fuel the wave of digital transformation and for global enterprises striving to keep pace in an increasingly digital world.
We are excited about the possibilities of our evolving platform and have developed a road map of compelling new services we anticipate rolling out over the next several quarters. Now let me cover highlights from our verticals. Our network vertical experienced solid bookings led by strength in AP and driven by major telcos, mobile operators and NSP resale. Expansions this quarter included Hutchison, a leading British mobile network operator upgrading infrastructure to support 5 gs and cloud services as well as a leading Asian communication provider migrating subsea cable nodes and connecting to ECX fabric for lower latency. Our Financial Services vertical saw near record bookings led by EMEA and strong growth in insurance and banking.
New wins included a Fortune 500 global insurer transforming IT delivery with a cloud first strategy, a top 3 auto insurer transforming network topology while securely connecting to multiple clouds and one of the largest global payment technology companies optimizing their corporate and commercial networks. The content digital media vertical produced solid bookings led by strong demand in the social media sub segment as providers continue to strive to improve user experience and expand the scope of their business models. Our gaming and e commerce sub segments grew the fastest year over year, led by customers including Tencent, Naver and Roblox. Our cloud and IT vertical also captured strong bookings, led by SaaS as the cloud diversifies towards a hybrid multi cloud architecture. We see a robust pipeline as cloud service providers continue to push to new markets and roll out additional services.
Expansions included a leading SaaS provider expanding to support growth in new markets and with the federal government as well as an AI powered commerce platform upgrading to enhance user experience and support a rapidly growing customer base. As digital transformation accelerates, the enterprise vertical continues to be our fastest growing vertical, led by healthcare, legal and travel sub segments this quarter. New wins included Air Canada, a top 5 North American airline deploying a hybrid multi cloud strategy SpaceX deploying infrastructure to interconnect dense network and partner ecosystems and one of the big 4 audit firms re architecting networks and interconnecting to multi cloud to improve the user experience for both employees and clients. Channel bookings also saw continued strength, delivering over 20% of bookings and accounting for half of our new logos. We're seeing accelerated success selling with our key cloud and technology alliance partners, including Cisco, Google, Microsoft and Oracle.
New channel wins this quarter included a win with Anixter for a leading French transportation and freight logistics company deploying mobility platform as well as a win with AT and T for a top 5 U. S. Bank accessing our network and cloud provider ecosystems. Now let me turn the call over to Keith and cover the results for the quarter.
Thanks, Charles, and once again, good afternoon to everyone. As highlighted by Charles, we're delighted with the start of our year, delivering great Q1 gross and net bookings alongside our 65th consecutive quarter of revenue growth. With this momentum, we're raising 2019 guidance across the board and are tracking well against the target set at our 2018 Analyst Day. MRR yields remained firm and MRR churn was lower than planned, allowing us to retain more value in the business by still fulfilling a diverse set of new customer demands weighted towards smaller deal sizes. We're continuing to invest in our growth and scale, both as it relates to our organic expansion as well as new product and services initiatives.
And at the same time, we've been able to leverage how we spend our SG and A dollars, reflecting our priority to increase the operating leverage in the business and reduce the SG and A line as a percent of revenues. Now I'll cover the quarterly highlights. Note that all growth rates in this section are on a normalized and constant currency basis. As depicted on Slide 4, global Q1 revenues were $1,360,000,000 up 11% over the same quarter last year and above the top end of our guidance range. Non recurring revenues were 6% of total revenues and an 11% increase over the prior quarter and reflect the inherent lumpiness of this revenue line.
We expect nonrecurring revenues to remain elevated in Q2, but given our current visibility to customer activities, we expect to return to more typical levels in the second half of the year, which is reflected in our guidance. Q1 revenues net of our FX hedges included a $3,000,000 positive FX benefit when compared to our prior guidance rates. Global Q1 adjusted EBITDA was $660,000,000 up 12% over the same quarter last year, largely due to strong operating performance and lower than planned utilities and repairs and maintenance expense. Our Q1 adjusted EBITDA performance, net of our FX hedges, included a $2,000,000 positive FX benefit when compared to our prior guidance rates. Global Q1 AFFO was $488,000,000 largely due to strong operating profit as well as lower net interest expense due to our cross currency swap on a portion of our U.
S. Denominated debt and a lower cost to borrow on our floating rate debt due to the credit rating increase. Also in the quarter, we had lower seasonal recurring capital expenditures, offset in part by higher cash taxes as expected. Q1 global MRR churn was 2.1%, better than our expectations for the quarter. For 2019, we expect MRR churn to average between 2% and 2.5% per quarter, although at the higher end of our range in Q2, mainly due to timing.
Turning to regional highlights, whose full results are covered on Slides 5 through 7. APAC and EMEA were our fastest growing MRR regions at 17% 13%, respectively, on a year over year normalized basis, followed by the Americas region at 5%. The Americas region had a strong start to the year with solid net bookings with a higher mix of small deals and a healthy pricing and pipeline environment. Americas had record non recurring revenues in the quarter, including a meaningful level of exports to the other two regions, as our teams continue to sell globally across our platform. Our EMEA region had a very strong quarter led by the U.
K. Business with significant additions to our cabinet billings and interconnections. In Q1, we opened meaningful new capacity across our flat markets with a strong build pipeline continuing over the rest of the year. We also purchased Amsterdam 11, an IBX in close proximity to our existing highly networked campus in Southeast Amsterdam. This acquired asset will help defer CapEx while creating near term capacity to fill the growing demand for digital infrastructure connectivity in the Netherlands and in the broader European market.
And the Asia Pacific region delivered strong bookings led by our Japan and Hong Kong businesses. APAC saw particular strength in the enterprise, cloud and content verticals as supported by our channel team. MRR per cabinet remained firm absorbing the significant new Canada installations at the end of last year. And now looking at the capital structure, please refer to Slide 8. Our unrestricted cash balance is approximately $1,600,000,000 an increase over the prior quarter due to strong operating cash flows and of course, the $1,240,000,000 follow on equity raise, but offset in part by our quarterly capital expenditures and cash dividend.
Our liquidity position remains very strong and our net debt leverage ratio dropped to 3.6x our Q1 annualized adjusted EBITDA, well within the targeted range of 3x to 4x net leverage. Also, given the strong momentum in our business and our commitment to use both debt and equity to fund our future growth, S and P upgraded all debt and our corporate family rating to investment grade. We believe we're on a solid path to attain a second investment grade rating, which once attained, will allow us to access the IG debt capital markets, thereby lowering our future cost to borrow. So at the end of the day, we have cash, we have liquidity, we're appropriately levered and we have one of the lowest AFFO payout ratios in the industry. This creates immense flexibility as we continue to scale our business and drive to maximize long term shareholder value.
Turning to Slide 9 for the quarter. Capital expenditures were approximately $364,000,000 including a recurring CapEx of 21,000,000 dollars We opened 7 new builds this quarter, including 3 new IBXs in London, Paris and Shanghai, adding 7,500 cabinets. We also purchased our Sao Paulo II facility as well as land for development in Milan and Frankfurt. Revenue from owned assets stepped up to 55%. And our capital investments delivered strong returns, as shown on Slide 10.
Our now 134 stabilized assets grew revenues 3% year over year on a constant currency basis, increasing quarter over quarter, reflecting a moderation of the prior headwinds experienced. Also consistent with prior years, during Q1, we completed the annual refresh of our IBX categorization. Our stabilized asset count increased by a net 4 IBXs. These stabilized assets are collectively 85% utilized and now generate a 31% cash on cash return on the gross PP and E invested due to the strength of the new assets added to the stabilized portfolio. And finally, please refer to Slides 11 through 15 for an updated summary of 2019 guidance and bridges.
For the full year 2019, we're raising our revenue guidance by $25,000,000 and adjusted EBITDA guidance by $30,000,000 primarily due to strong operating performance. This guidance implies a revenue growth rate of 9% year over year and a healthy adjusted EBITDA margin of 47% to 48%. Also, we're reducing our 2019 integration cost assumption to $13,000,000 a $2,000,000 reduction compared to the prior guidance. And given the operating momentum of the business, we continue to improve our AFFO and AFFO per share core metrics. We're raising our 2019 AFFO by $45,000,000 to grow 13% to 14% compared to the previous year, which includes the net interest benefits attributed to our rating pardon me, our credit rating upgrade.
We're also narrowing our 2019 AFFO per share range to a midpoint of $22.70 excluding integration costs. AFFO per share is expected to grow between 8% 9%, which includes the dilutive impact from the Q1 equity raise. We've assumed a weighted average 84,100,000 common shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis. And we expect our 2019 cash dividends to increase to approximately $820,000,000 a 13% increase over the prior year or an 8% increase on a per share basis. So with that, I'm going to stop here and turn the call back to Charles.
Thank you, Keith. In closing,
we believe that digital transformation will persist as a driving force in the global economy, and we are positioning ourselves to seize that momentum. With our unmatched global reach, the industry's most comprehensive interconnection platform, an unparalleled track record of service excellence and an expanding portfolio of leadership. We are tracking ahead of our 2019 targets, and we have a clear set of priorities for this year to drive durable and growing AFFO per share for our shareholders. So let me stop here and open it up for questions.
The first question comes from Sami Badri from Credit Suisse. Your line is open.
Hi, thank you. Looking at your average revenue per cross connect in Europe, it looks like it was down double digits year on year in 1Q 2019. So we just wanted to get a better idea on the
market dynamics that are happening there. It's just the industry's perception
that that business is financial services, you think that you would see a bit of a mix shift upward. Can you just give to financial services, you think that you would see a bit of a mix shift upward. Could you just give us some color on the dynamics in the region?
Yes. I would say, I'd have to look at that particular step, and I would say more generically, I think the interconnection business across the globe and including inclusive of EMEA continues to be very strong. And so I think the demand for interconnection both across our full interconnected portfolio of interconnection services continues to be solid. As we've mentioned, we are in the process of sort of normalizing our interconnection pricing to Equinix levels across the board. So I'd expect that over time, we're going to continue to see an uplift in terms of our unit performance in that region.
So at a macro level, interconnection in Europe continues to be very healthy with strong demand.
Yes, Simon, the other thing I would just add, one of the things we did, we adjusted some of the cross connect counts in the last quarter as we reconciled some of the Telecity installed base. And so the revenue was still there, but the count was adjusted upwards to reflect the number of units. And so you're seeing a little bit of a reduction because of that. But there's nothing fundamentally that has changed within our pricing model. And in fact, as Charles said, we're normalizing our pricing structure as we roll that out through Europe in 2019.
Yes, that's right, Keith. I forgot about that. So that's maybe a bit of an optical thing. It was essentially, that was whenever we do an acquisition, we take a fairly conservative view of count because oftentimes the installed base is when you end up going in and doing the audit ends up differently. And so in this case, we had that reserve essentially a reserve sitting out there on a unit basis, But all the revenue was there and then we brought it in, so that shows a bit of a sort of an optical disconnect.
Got it. Thank you.
It was a
reconciliation on the chart Q4 earnings deck, semi.
Got it. Thank you. Yes, I saw the changes in Q4 specifically. The other question I had was on ECX and maybe we could just get a better idea on the percentage of your customers that are using the ECX fabric to connect to multiple regions, Just as we get an idea on how many clients or customers are leaning specifically this as the key differentiator versus just deploying in their more traditional sense. We just want to get, can you give us any kind of percentages or a quantified idea that would be great?
Well, we do have the obviously the 1500 customers, so you get a sense for just how many of our customers are actually implemented on it and you also get a sense for how much upside remains for us there. I think in terms of the total percentage of those customers that have yet sort of availed themselves of the multi regional connectivity aspect of ECX Fabric, that's still relatively small, but with a lot of upside opportunity there. It is actually well ahead of what our plan was, and so we're seeing it uptake on that faster than we had even expected. But it's still a relatively small percentage, I would think, of the total number of of customers that are yet using the cross regional. But I think that they are absolutely seeing it though as a key differentiator.
I think the ability for them to house infrastructure in proximity to the multi cloud generates performance and cost benefits that are part of being on Platform Equinix and then have the confidence that they can interconnect to the rest of their own private infrastructure and or to cloud endpoints that aren't in their chosen location is a compelling value proposition for them. And I will tell you that as I'm out with our sales teams, they continue to see ECX Fabric at least as the primary hook for conversations with customers these days. And so we're very pleased with how that's playing out in the market.
Great. Thank you. And then my last question has to do with some of your JVs that were announced and you've laser focused on Europe. And based on what you laid out in your 2018 Analyst Day and some of the return profiles in the JV structured agreements, are we looking at similar return profiles in these future JVs that are coming in that you laid out in the 2018 Analyst Day? Or should we expect it to look a little bit different just given, some time as digestion and partnerships are starting to form?
Well, again, there's no we haven't announced any are you talking specifically about the hyperscale JVs?
That's correct.
Yes. No announcements there yet. As we said in the script, we expect that, that will be announced and we are focused on EMEA as as the first JV opportunity, tracking very well there. We feel very good about the financing partners we're talking to as well as the customer uptake. What we showed at Analyst Day, I think continues to be consistent with our expectations.
I think we're going to see really good solid headline returns on those projects. And I think our pipeline reflects is supporting that notion right now. And then Equinix, just due to the fee structure and the flow of fees for us as management fees and some of the other fees that flow to us in that, we'll see some upsized returns from that. We'll get good solid equity returns and then see some juice from the fees as well. So we feel good about the structure overall tracking well.
And I think that the I don't think that the structure would look meaningfully different over time, Keith, unless you had a different view on that.
We'll definitely update you in Q2. Again, we're excited to announce the final formation of the JV and the JV partner, and we'll discuss that in the Q2 timeframe.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Jordan Sadler from KeyBanc. Your line is open.
Thank you. Good afternoon.
I
had a follow-up on the JV. I don't want to jump the gun relative to your planned announcement, but you made the comment of no impact, I think, to the P and L in 2019 relative to guidance. I just wanted to clarify what specifically you were referencing, if it was guidance or the actual P and L? And then because I would think, as you just mentioned, Charles, there could potentially be an uplift to you guys as a result of a fee stream, especially if there's some stabilized assets being stuck into the JV? And then I have a follow-up.
Yes.
You want to go ahead, Keith? Yes. So, Jordan, let me just touch base. So on the last earnings call, what we did do is we gave you an update of basically the net burn. Burn.
We're investing in the hyperscale initiative team right now or what we refer to as our hit team. So all the so there's a lot of, if you will, cost going through the P and L today, and so that is embedded in the guidance. What you have not seen is what we said was on a go forward basis, the AFFO impact because we're in the development phase and we'll be putting some stabilized assets into the JV, taking some cash out and then investing in new developments, there will be no meaningful impact to AFFO per share when we make that announcement. But for that, what it doesn't say is that there is an anticipation of a meaningful amount of cash, as Charles alluded to on the last earnings call, of cash coming back into the business. And then that's going to then fund the future developments.
And so there's a lot to talk about with respect to JV, but we don't want anybody to assume any incremental AFFO per share in fiscal year 2019 related to this.
Okay. It sounds like there could be it could be a flows issue as you'll have a cash flow coming in and over time that will drag initially and over time that will be redeployed if I'm not putting words in your mouth?
It goes back to really what Shaul said. When you look at the assets at the project level, very good returns for both ourselves and what we believe to be our financing partner. And so we're happy at the project return. In addition, Equinix will receive a certain amount of fee income associated with it. So when you look at basically the return on our equity, it's a very attractive investment decision for us and it's a good project return for our partners.
And then there's always the potential for the upside at some point in the future, depending on how we liquidate the assets.
And then lastly, could you speak to the growth in physical versus virtual cross connects? I appreciate the disclosure you guys have been providing there. I'm just curious, the virtual cross connect volume clearly is growing at a faster rate, which makes sense. Just maybe talk to what your expectations would be there, one versus the other? And then if you could elaborate on pricing?
Sure, sure. Yes, we see continued health across the Intersection portfolio. And I think that's one of the key differences is that we bring a very rich set of interconnection options to our customers to solve a very different and varied set of use cases for them. And so depending on what they want to accomplish, depending on their confidence particularly from enterprise tremendous uptake on ECX Fabric, particularly from enterprise connectivity to the cloud. That should be no surprise to anybody.
And we expect that, that will continue to be a very strong sort of element of our business going forward. But what often happens is a maturation and a staging of things where people initially sort of begin to test moving workloads into the cloud. They may do that over the fabric using by a port and then provision capacity to a cloud, see how that works. But over time, it's often more cost effective and more performant for them to actually move to physical connectivity, private and an actual cross connect at a future stage of the maturation of their cloud strategy. And so that's what we typically see as use case.
So that's why we've said that we don't really there's probably some very modest level of substitution, but we see them generally as complementary. And that's why both of them continue to grow well. In terms of pricing, the individual unit cost for a virtual connect is lower, but you have to recognize that you do have to pay the upfront port cost to essentially enable those virtual connects. And so depending on how many virtual connects you might provision over a single port, it can vary meaningfully. But in terms of yield to us right now, we're not seeing a dramatic difference.
I think as virtual cross connect volumes scale, you will see a slightly lower average price point on virtual than physical. But again, the economics of both and the return on capital for both of those products are exceptionally good for Equinix. Thank you.
Thank you.
The next question comes from Philip Cusick from JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Hey, guys. Thanks. 2, if I can. 1 for Charles. For the JV, are these going to be different sales processes for different customers going forward between the legacy Equinix and the JV facilities?
Or do you anticipate those being a single sales process? I'm just trying to think about how you plan to protect the high price and differentiated legacy business from being used to subsidize the new business? And then for Keith, can you dig in a little more into the SG and A scaling? How should we think about this long term trend versus revenue? And what's being done to control costs?
Thanks. Yes. So let me take the JV first. As we said, one of the key things for us is that we wanted to be able to deliver a more comprehensive portfolio of offers to our hyperscale partners. As you recall and what I presented at the Analyst Day, we currently have and now well beyond this, but at that time we've had a $500,000,000 a year business with the 12 top hyperscalers.
And I showed how that was growing across portfolio from sort of smaller, highly interconnected footprints up to sort of larger, more wholesale type hyperscale type footprints for different needs. But I think the bottom line is, is that we want to use our single unified
relationship with that customer, our understanding of their
needs and the trust integration between our platforms to continue to service their needs. And but there's we see the opportunity as quite distinct. So typically, they would be using Equinix facilities more for networking nodes, private interconnection nodes and those kind of targeted elements of their architectures and looking more for availability zones or in large server farm type footprints in more of the hyperscale arena. So we think there's a relatively clean line there for us to manage and we think there's plenty of opportunity for both the JV and Equinix and our partner to do very well with those large footprints as well as for us to continue to grow the targeted more interconnected footprints.
Okay.
And Philip, on the second question on SG and A scaling, I think this is a journey as you can well appreciate. 1st and foremost, when you look at where we started, our SG and A as we sort of top ticked, we're at between 22% 23% SG and A as a percent of revenue. And today, we're closer to the 2018 to 2019 with the ability to potentially scale that down further. But how we're doing it is across I think it's important to understand, 1st and foremost, it really is about our team and taking our team and figuring out how to align them most efficiently. It is also about our systems and our processes and the recognition that we're through many of the integrations that we've had as a company as we've integrated different businesses and acquisitions into the, if you will, the parent company.
And then you couple that with we've invested quite heavily in 2018 and certainly into 2019 and in the procurement and strategic procurement team and strategic purchasing team inside the organization. And that's certainly going to pay dividends as well as we continue to work to drive down our average cost units across many different functions and items. And then the last piece I'll just share with you is that Charles alluded to it on the last earnings call, and we have talked about it previously, there's an element of it's the savings that we want to make sure we take the dollars and we put them and dedicate them in sort of the right areas. And so we want to continue to take dollars where we can, where we can find those savings, and we put it back into the business to fund the customer facing initiatives, the new product initiatives, the go to market strategies and the like. And so there's an element where we'll put it back into the business and hence invest in our future.
And there's an element where we'll drive margins up and that's effectively returning to the shareholders in the form of a growing cash dividend. We're doing a real good job again of looking at our systems, our processes, allocating appropriately. And then the last piece I'd just say is we're doing a real good job at prioritizing and prioritizing throughout the organization. We say here internally, there's never a project that we don't like that is always they're always well intended, great just so many projects we can do as an organization, but we can only do so much. And under Charles' leadership, we're really focusing on how to prioritize to the highest and best use of our capital.
And that's again, that's part of the reason that you're seeing our SG and A as a percent of revenues go down. Thanks, guys.
The next question comes from Michael Rollins from Citi. Your line is open.
Hi, good afternoon. First, if you look at the non recurring revenue, it continues to be pretty robust. What does that say about the installations and pace for the future? And also, how do we think about the non recurring line item going forward? Thanks.
So Michael, one of the things I said, at least in the prepared remarks, is we saw a meaningful step up in our NRR this quarter. It was up 11% quarter over quarter. It's roughly 6% of our total revenues. It is a lumpy it tends to be lumpy as it relates in many cases to custom sales orders or specific goods for resale that we might enter into with some of our large strategic customers. And so Q1, yes, you saw a relatively large increase.
Q2, I think you're going to see NR we're guiding to NR going down slightly quarter over quarter, but still elevated to relative to prior years. And then going into Q3, Q4, you should see it start to step down to a more traditional level. So again, it's a reflection of the number of deals that we're doing with customers, the amount of custom sales order work, and it will be lumpy. And what we're going to try and do is the best that we can anyways, we'll continue to guide to it because I think it's an important element of things that could go up and go down over any given quarter, at least on a sequential basis.
Yes, Mike, I'd just offer also, I mean, I think it's part of the sort of the trusted advisor we're developing with our customers. They really and candidly a big shout out to our global sales engineering team around the world who does a phenomenal job of engaging our customers and developing a trust, level of trust there where they're comfortable with us implementing these really very strategic implementations that are central to how they do business and trusting us to do that. And so it is something that we honestly we have to watch and be careful. We want to make sure it's an appropriate sort of piece of our mix of business. But we also we think we can do it at attractive margins.
I mean, it's something our customers really want us to do. As we said, we right now are we think we're going to continue robust through the first half of the year and we've guided to a little tapering of that in the second half of the year based on our visibility.
Thanks very much.
The next question comes from Simon Flannery from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Great. Thanks so much. On the hyperscale JVs, good to hear the update on the EMEA. Are we likely to see other transactions this year either in EMEA or other regions? Or is it likely to be 1 and then we'll maybe see more down the road?
And then secondly, any updates on merger integration for Infomart and Verizon? Where do we stand on some of that progress? Thanks.
Why don't I take the first one, I'll push the back one to Charles. On the JV, the first one is probably the more complex one. It is a European based JV. There is a second one that is going to be forthcoming. It will be focused on the Asia market, more specifically, at least Japan to start.
And then we would anticipate other JVs after that. But still a little bit early, Simon, but we are progressing with the shortly to the second JV. And in both cases, we look forward to announcing them over the near term.
And would the second one be smaller than the first one?
Well, the second one will have probably less units in it to start, as I said. But it's still a meaningful it's a meaningfully sized JV and again, initially dedicated towards the Japanese market, whereas the initial JV for Europe is London,
Paris,
Frankfurt and Amsterdam.
Okay,
great. So it gives you a sense that they are going to be somewhat market specific. They're going to be timing specific. And again, without getting into sort of the details, the first one will have stabilized assets that we move into it. On a go forward basis, it's unlikely stabilized assets would be moved into the JV.
It would really be about a partnership funding the hyperscale initiative.
And then quickly on the integration, obviously we're pretty well progressed on most of that stuff. You see that in terms of pretty small stub left of integration costs for the remainder of the year. I think we took that down to $13,000,000 $2,000,000 down from where it was. So the bulk of the work is done. I would say that, again, we continue to be very pleased with both the financial and strategic benefits that we've gained from the variety of transactions that we've done.
Specifically to Verizon, you mentioned, I think we're we actually are seeing great bookings into those assets. We actually saw record bookings into the Verizon assets, but now they're really fully integrated into how we think about Platform Equinix now. But we see great momentum in a number of those markets. I would say that we're still seeing a little bit of the churn tail on Verizon. And it's not that it's bigger than what we thought, it's just that it's taking longer to work through and that's not really all that surprising.
So and it's a goodness thing. In the end, we had we probably had that revenue for longer than we anticipated, but it is causing a little bit longer, churn tail, and I think that's deferring the sort of return to growth, a bit further into the year than what we had anticipated. So, so but again, really pleased with that transaction overall. Infomart, that's progressing well. We actually have now a project underway that's going to put nearly 2,000 cabinets onto that campus.
And we feel very good about our ability to build a portfolio of offerings on the InfoMart campus and really take what we think will be a really outstanding market position in a very large and important colo market there.
Thank you.
The next question comes from Colby Synesael from Cowen and Company. Your line is open.
Great. Thank you. 2, if I may. You added 4,400 cabinet spilling in the quarter, which was down from the 4th quarter and a little bit late, at least relative to our number. And you added 7,500 new cabinets to the base.
Just curious that based on the 7,500 that you did add, would you expect to see a step up in cabinets billing net adds, if you will, as we go into the 2nd quarter? And then secondly, when I look at your EBITDA guidance for the Q2, you're guiding to flat to maybe down 10,000,000 dollars depending on where you come out. And I'm just curious what's behind that. I think that you mentioned part of the upside to gross margins in the Q1 was tied to lower maintenance and utilities. I'm assuming that that's one time benefit, so maybe that's what explains it.
But I'm also curious what the margin profile on the non recurring looks like and if that changes meaningfully quarter to quarter? Thank you.
I'll let Keith the second part there on the guidance. But on the cabinet adds, I would just I'd encourage us to look at sort of the overall body of work over the last two quarters, right, and look at the level of cabinet adds, the level of interconnection adds, the number of deals, the margin performance, the margin expansion. And so we continue to be extremely happy with the overall performance of the business and the momentum. I do think that cabinets billing, as we've always said, is a little bit dependent on a variety of factors. Asia had a breakout quarter last quarter, and then sort of you sometimes see a bit of a hysteresis from that.
And so it's I think that right now we're seeing a level of cabinet adds when we look at over rolling 4 quarter averages, that is super healthy for the business and would expect to continue to see that going forward.
Colby, as it relates to the second question, there's certainly as we alluded to in our prepared remarks, there's a number of things that went on in the Q1 and part of it is just the timing of expenses. Part of it is utility based. If you recall, on the last earnings call, we talked about the drag associated with utilities, and it wasn't quite as anticipated in Q1, but on a go forward basis, we're planning utilities to continue to step up. And so that's affecting us us to the tune of roughly 60 basis points. And then the other part is, to the extent they don't step up, then that's something that would come back to the business, of course, similar to what we experienced in Q1.
2nd part is just timing. Again, like anything with Q1, you've got Chinese New Year, you've got our annual sales kickoff. And so there's cost that move around in the quarter and our timing on when we make those decisions. So there's some investments that we're going to make in Q2 as we relative to what we did in Q1. And then the last thing I would just say is, it's important to note when we originally started the year, we thought that we'd take we originally anticipated the margins would come down slightly, but there was reasons why that.
Those big expansion drag, those utilities, those ASC 8 42% and the like. As we look forward now, we're actually taking margins up slightly, which are 48.3 percent for the year. And that also assumes that we still have roughly 100 basis point drag in the system, which is reflected in our bridges. And so again, we recognize that it's not we love to have all nice straight lines and up into the right, but the reality of how we run our business and the global nature, it causes different costs to fall in different quarters and sometimes it's just timing based. And so again, I just guide you to the fact that overall for the year, we're now raising our guidance, we've raised our margins and we still are preserving what we anticipate to be a higher cost model going forward as it relates to utilities.
Great. Thank you.
The next question comes from Jon Adkins from RBC. Your line is open.
Thanks very much. So I'm interested, I don't know if I missed this or not, but any sort of impacts that you're still seeing or expect to see from 10 to 100 gig migration? And then secondly, just maybe to put a finer point on some of the SG and A questions, a lot of moving parts, but can you talk about projected ramps or not in sales engineering headcount, sales headcount and overall kind of shifts, if there are any in kind of your go to market strategy?
Sure. So let me try to tackle all that. The 10 to 100, as we said last quarter, we I think we reported last quarter about 7,000 physical cross connects, 1800 virtual. So very much at the top end of our sort of ranges that we typically give of 5,000 to 7,000 on physical. We were at 5,500 physical this quarter and 1900 virtual.
So we did see a bit of a we saw some of the 10 gig to 100 gig resume in terms of that. We had mentioned that there was a bit of a pause on that probably due to network moratoriums taking hold previously. So but we still believe that the larger projects 10 to 100 are very well advanced. And so we do think we'll see some tapering on that over the course of the year. We probably saw also a little bit of NSP, network service provider consolidation impacts in the quarter.
And with those things combined, when we look at gross adds, we're super pleased with the level of gross adds. Again, we do have a little bit of headwind associated with the 10 to 100 and a little bit on the consolidation side. But overall, strong performance, but we and we do think the 10, 100 will probably taper off, particularly in the Americas through the year. We will probably see some of that in the other regions, but to a much lesser degree given the concentrations of traffic. And then SG and A, I think that we will ramp, we are expanding the go to market engine and we have about 500 quarter bearing heads today.
We will add to that in a probably over the course of the remainder of the year targeting maybe 5.25% or something like that. But we'll add we'll continue to add if we feel like we're getting good ramps to productivity. And yes, we are we will add the sort of the full contingent of resources around the headcount to ensure their success. That includes both sales engineering and solution architect and other support type resources. But we're being very careful about how we do that to make sure that we keep the keep our commitments to gaining some operating leverage in the business over the course of the year.
And Jonathan, if I could just add one more thing in that, I think it's important. If you look at the trend line over the last 5, 6 quarters, you see that, yes, we're continuing to invest in the sales and marketing area. And as Charles said, focusing on the dollars in the right area. At the same time, you're seeing on a cash basis, the G and A dollars sort of remain flat. So it gives you a sense, again, going back to my earlier comments, as a percent of revenue, SG and A on a cash basis is going down.
But you're also seeing a greater investment in the front of house customer facing initiatives, which is exactly where we want to deploy our capital.
Yes. Thanks.
Go ahead.
Jonathan, just that you also asked just a more generic piece about the go to market. I would just offer that Mike Campbell, our Chief Sales Officer and Carl, and his new role are working really closely together to continue to drive efficiency and effectiveness in the go to market engine overall. I think that includes a couple of prominent features. 1, continued investment in the channel and partnering with a number of partners who are having great success in partnership with us, likes of AT and T and Verizon and Orange and some great work with Cisco targeting some joint customers. So we're seeing we're going to continue to invest in the channel.
Then we also are going to continue to add resources to both drive new logo capture as well as land and expand behavior with the logos we've already captured. When we look at it in terms of how much wallet share there is on some of the sort of Fortune 500 and Global 2,000 customers that we've landed, we think there's an immense opportunity. And so we're shaping both the sales roles and the patches continuing to drive that as well.
Thank you. And you mentioned channel, any kind of quantification? I think you talked about success of quarters of 20% contributions or more, but how does that sort of break out by region? And then my last question just on Asia Pac. China, I saw the Shanghai 6400 cabbies and wondering kind of the expected ramp there.
In the past. I think you've talked about maybe entering new metros in China or is the focus for the time being likely to be just on that one metro?
Yes. So on channel, we are seeing we had probably led in the Americas, just a more maybe mature channel market and we invested our initial sort of resources and dollars there. One of the things that I think we're going to see we have seen improvements on and we'll see even more now with Carl taking a sort of consolidated global role is driving a really consistent channel program across the world in terms of the resources that we have on the ground to do that. But all of them all three regions are tracking very well in their embrace of channel. That 20 plus percent number is overall, but I think and I do think the all three regions are tracking well in terms of embracing channel.
And then as for China, again, I think we've seen good response to the Shanghai capacity that's come online. I think we're going to have to continue to monitor the situation in China carefully relative to kind of how much additional capital we would think about putting to work in that market. We do have the JV relationship now, which allows us, we think, a high degree of confidence in terms of how we've approached the market. But I think we'll sort of see how the capacity uptake and customer uptake occurs there and kind of revisit that as we go.
Thank you very much.
The next question comes from Nick Del Deo from MoffettNathanson. Your line is open.
Hey, thanks for taking my questions. You noted the cross border bookings were up substantially this quarter. Can you give some added detail on that front? Like what share of deals fall into that category? And if we were to think about bookings by the region where they were sourced rather than where the revenue is generated, How would your business be split between the three regions?
Yes, it's a great question, Nick. We do look at it that way and we have as you might expect, I think just given the sort of typical maturation cycles of technology and how they sort of flow across the globe, we do have a very significant portion of bookings that are exports from the Americas based sales force to the rest of the world. But we have also seen continued efforts for the rest of the selling teams across the world to really embrace selling the global platform. And again, it is one of the things that is driving force for moving to this more globalized go to market model under Karl's leadership. So, but we look at that in terms of we look at all of our deals in terms of where they are sourced, where the headquarter location is, and then we look at the assets.
And if it is if there's a cross border flow there, we consider that a cross border global export booking.
Okay. Makes sense. And then one
on Europe. I think you've historically been willing to do more larger footprint deals in Europe versus other regions. What share of bookings in that region would you characterize as being larger footprint? And to what degree might the hit initiatives siphon off some of those deals and perhaps weigh on consolidated
growth? Yes, really good question. I do think that we have had a bit more of an appetite there. I think that's in part due to the pricing sort of dynamics in Europe and our capacity situation there and a variety of other factors. But what we have done is really looked at what we think that our sweet spot is in terms of bookings.
There's no magical spot, I don't think. Over time, we used to refer to large footprint as 250 kilowatt and above many years ago. And I think now you're talking about probably more like megawatt plus type deals that are more in that really large footprint category. And so there's not a ton of those. I do think that we would our desire would be to funnel those to the JV, because that's the right asset for the we have long used the sort of right customer, right application in the right asset kind of mantra, and it's one we strongly believe in, in terms of driving returns and appropriate allocation of capital.
So I think on the very large footprint with the hyper scale community, we're going to we would expect to see those begin to migrate probably to the JV and that would affect I think our bookings to some degree. But I think we've contemplated that in our guidance. We've contemplated that in our projected growth rates for the business. And so it reflects that to some degree already.
The next question comes from John Hodulik from UBS. Your line is open.
Great, thanks. Two quick ones I think. First of all, what's driving the higher MRR churn that you guys talked about for the Q2? I don't know if it's the Verizon churn you referenced in a previous question. And are we sure that that's just a sort of a temporary move and not going to continue?
And then anything you could tell us about conversations with the other 2 rating agencies and potentially any timing on moves on their part? Thanks.
Yes, I'll let Keith take the second one. As it relates to the first, obviously, we reported at the very low end of kind of our 2% to 2.5% with 2.1% this quarter. And I think really the way to think about it is just that we deferral of churn is a good thing for us, right? And so we work hard to defer it or make it go away as best we can. And in this quarter, I think we saw some deferrals that we probably would have initially expected to come into this quarter.
And so we'll always take that, but I do think it represents a little bit of an uptick in the following quarter. But nothing structural there. I think, yes, there is some of that is definitely from the Verizon assets, absolutely. And so over time, I think that we feel comfortable with our 2% to 2.5% range. And our objective would be to continue to really drive discipline in deal selection that over time we'd hope to look to lower that range when the time is appropriate for us to do so.
Hey, John, on the second question, as it relates to the rating agencies, no surprise to you on the heels of working with S and P with the upgrade. We are working with the other 2 rating agencies. I think continuing to have a strong strategic performance like we're having, our leverage going down, again, our commitment to use both debt and equity as we fund the business going forward and having a leverage ratio of 3.6. No surprise to you, both other rating agencies upgraded as 1 to 1 notch below investment grade with a positive outlook. So I remain meaningfully optimistic that we will get that 2nd investment grade rating over the not too distant future.
But again, it's not up to us to decide. We're going to do all the things that we need to do as a business to make sure we put ourselves in good stead, and we're going to focus on getting that second rating. But again, we're doing as you would expect and working hard with the rating agencies to continue to share with them why we believe we should be investment grade.
The last question comes from Frank Louthan from Raymond James. Your line is open.
Great. Thank you very much. Got a quick question about the JV. Just in sorry for the background noise. Quick question on the JV and for two things.
First, how important is that to have multiple partners there? Are you seeking multiple partners from the JV? And then secondly, talking about the
Frank
Frank, I'll let we can tag team this. 1, I'm glad to see your dog's excitement about our results. Fired up. But I think that the I forgot your question.
Number partners.
Yes.
I think we're getting value to the call here.
No problem. We I think that right now, we're really focused on getting this initial transaction done. We have talked about the fact that we could have multiple partners over time. At the same time, we would be happy to embrace more comprehensively global partners where we can. There's some efficiency and effectiveness in doing that.
So I think it will really depend on kind of where we land on this one and we'll evaluate each of the markets distinctly.
And as it relates to the second question, Frank, I think it's important to understand that part of the reason that we really wanted to push it off balance sheet and have a minority interest was to so we didn't consolidate. And although as we said earlier on, the return profile for Equinix and return on equity on an IRR basis is very, very attractive as it is also for our partner. We want to make sure that we can hold that debt off book. And so what will typically happen is the rating agencies will look through into the JV structure and they'll allocate on a pro rata basis the amount of leverage that sits in the JV to the parent company. Again, important for a couple reasons.
Again, we care about our balance sheet and our core metrics, but the other part is having the JV in this partnership arrangement, as Charles alluded to, with 1 or potential more partners, allows us to get capital back in. We get to recycle that capital, put it back into the business as appropriate. And then there's a fee stream associated with it. So it gives us the opportunity to continue to focus our cash and our energy on the retail business at the same time increasing strategic value by having it off balance sheet with our partners.
Great. That concludes our Q1 call. Thank you for joining us.
That does conclude today's call. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time.