Welcome to the LeMaitre Vascular Q3 2021 F inancial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. JJ Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer of LeMaitre Vascular. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us on our Q3 2021 conference call. With me on today's call are our Chairman and CEO, George LeMaitre, and our President, Dave Roberts. Before we begin, I'll read our safe harbor statement. Today, we will make some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the accuracy of which is subject to risks and uncertainties.
Wherever possible, we will try to identify those forward-looking statements by using words such as believe, expect, anticipate, pursue, forecast, and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions as of today, 28 October 2021, and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates or views on any subsequent date.
Please refer to the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information and the risk factors in our most recent 10-K and subsequent SEC filings, including disclosure of the factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which include EBITDA.
A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures discussed in this call is contained in the associated press release and is available in the investor relations section of our website, www.lemaitre.com. I'll now turn the call over to George LeMaitre.
Thanks, JJ. On today's call, I'll cover three topics. Number one, Q3 sales of $38.4 million were up 5%. Number two, the impact of the Delta variant. Finally, number three, our progress rebuilding headcount and the sales force. Sales of $38.4 million were up 5% versus Q3 2020. Sales grew 5% in the Americas, 5% in Europe, and 16% in APAC. Artegraft, allografts, and valvulotomes led sales growth. Artegraft sales of $6.3 million were up 15% year-over-year.
We also posted record bovine carotid patch sales as the initial CE mark issues resolved in Q3 and our Japanese launch showed momentum. Biologics comprised 49% of our sales in Q3. Due to the Delta variant, many hospitals deferred elective surgery and prioritized COVID treatments. The variant may also cause patients to defer procedures.
From a personnel perspective, 43 employees have been infected since the pandemic began. Approximately 85% of our employees are fully vaccinated, and we await OSHA guidance on the U.S. vaccine mandate. As of today, we have 103 sales reps on payroll, with 6 more offers signed and 17 more territories being recruited. Soon, we will surpass our high-water mark of 112 reps. With 440 employees on our payroll, we are now back to pre-COVID levels.
Partly due to the competitive hiring landscape, we recently instituted an across-the-board $20 minimum wage for our North American employees, and we increased our North American entry-level sales rep pay by about $10,000 a year. Hiring picked up in September and October, possibly due to these two changes. Despite the chaotic environment of the last 18 months, our business is emerging stronger and more profitable, and our business plan remains unchanged.
We're growing our sales force, maintaining high op margins, generating cash, and investing in acquisitions. I'll now turn the call over to JJ.
Thanks, George. Our Q3 2021 gross margin was 64.8%, an increase of 2.5% over the prior year period. The increase was largely due to Q3 2020 inventory purchase accounting related to the Artegraft acquisition, as well as ASP increases in the manufacturing inefficiencies and unfavorable product mix in Q3 2021. We posted operating income of $9.1 million in Q3 2021, a decrease of 9% versus the prior year quarter. Increased operating expenses drove the decline as we continued to normalize our headcount.
While year-over-year bottom line comparisons are challenging due to pandemic-reduced operating expenses in the year-ago quarter, we posted a 24% operating margin this quarter. We will continue to hire personnel and sales reps while keeping a close eye on our operating margin. We ended Q3 2021 with no debt and $67.1 million of cash and investments. This increase was driven by our $58.7 million stock offering as well as $11.3 million in EBITDA generated in the quarter.
We used $23 million of our cash to pay down the remaining Artegraft-related debt and have significant excess cash available for investment. Turning to guidance, we expect Q4 2021 sales of $39 million-41 million, which represents an increase of 7% at the midpoint versus Q4 2020, and expect operating income of $8.3 million-9.7 million, which represents a decrease of 6% at the midpoint.
Our Q4 2021 EPS guidance of $0.29-0.34 per share represents a decrease of 8% at the midpoint. In closing, I'd like to welcome Anthony Petrone and Zach Weiner from Jefferies, who have recently initiated coverage on LeMaitre. In addition, I would like to welcome Javier Fonseca from Spartan Capital, who also initiated coverage on LeMaitre in Q3. With that, I'll turn it back over to the operator for questions.
Our first question will come from the line of Anthony Petrone from Jefferies. You may begin.
Hey, this is Zach on for Anthony. Thanks for taking the question. A few from us. Can you quantify the Delta impact and the backlog that you're seeing? How long do you think it'll take for surgeons to work through that backlog?
Yeah. Hey, nice to have you on this call for the first time, Zach. This is George. Welcome to the Jefferies folks. We're saying it's about $1 million. The guidance midpoint miss was about $1 million, and it feels like about $1 million. It's really hard, as I'm sure you can understand, to be precise on how much it was. The second part of your question is when does that unwind?
We really don't know. It feels like every time we go through the COVID wave, it kinda unwinds a little quicker, and the effect is a little bit less so, but we don't know the future. I think whatever we thought about that question, we tried to bake into our guidance for Q4, and I think you can see in Q4, we're projecting a 7% organic growth rate.
That's helpful. One of the themes that we've heard so far through earnings is the impact of staffing shortages. Is that anything that you guys have seen on your end?
We may or may not have seen it. I guess at my level, I haven't. To be honest with you, I don't know so much about that. You're talking staffing shortages at hospitals, correct?
At hospitals, yeah.
Right.
Impact to procedure volume. Yep.
To be quite honest, maybe I should have, but I hadn't distinguished between that function and just the no patients because of COVID patient function. I don't know that.
Got it. One more for us. On the manufacturing inefficiencies that you referenced, that were referenced in your release, do you envision them or do you expect them to roll off in 4Q? Or is that a headwind that you think will continue to progress through the Q4 ?
Yeah, Zach, this is JJ. There's a lot of things going on and running through the gross margin line. I think you see sequentially we've got a little bit of an improvement baked in. Some of these topics has been write-downs of inventory, E&O from maybe exiting some product lines, and, or building up inventory for manufacturing transfers and not getting all the SKUs quite right. Maybe a little bit of CE topics in there as well that we've sort of gone through now but have come through the P&L.
I do feel like maybe that improves a little bit in the coming quarters, and that's probably a little bit of a tailwind going from Q3- Q4. There's probably a mix or flow to the extent it does really well. That tends to bring down the margin, and then valvulotomes and allograft to the extent that they do well tend to bring up the margin. I'm guessing there'll be sort of a favorable product mix shift in Q4, and that's helping the margin as well.
There's a lot of other topics as well. For example, how did we do 4, 5, 6 months ago in terms of manufacturing efficiencies in our different departments? Those answers will now come through the P&L in Q4. I think that's gonna be a favorable topic for us as well as we roll towards Q4. So a lot of puts and takes, but I think we got to that sort of improvement in the margin through those concepts.
If we could sneak one last one in. Looks like OpEx spend is gonna step up in 4Q. Can you just talk about that briefly?
Well, of course, you're seeing us talk a lot about those sales reps, so it probably can start and end there, but that's happening around the company. We're back finally at 440 employees to being at what I'll call pre-COVID levels, and then we're ramping up the sales force. A lot of it's embedded in that.
Perfect. That's helpful. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Rick Wise from Stifel. You may begin.
Good afternoon, George. Hello, everybody. George, maybe, I mean, it seems like one of the most notable things you're talking about tonight is that sales force expansion. Now at 103 reps, 6 more already signed, 17 more to go, you're gonna be, sounds like with any luck, a 125 or 126, what, in the next 6 months. Just a couple of questions.
Yeah.
Maybe you could expand on it just, sorry to interrupt, but I was gonna say, just, where are these folks going? What are you splitting territories? Creating new territories? What geographies? What are you prioritizing? How do we think about then on the other side of all this, the potential theoretical all things equal impact on sales? Start to see it in the second half of next year? Or help us just think through all that. Thank you.
Okay. Great, Rick. Well, lots of questions and if I miss any, come back and remind me that I missed them. I think that the main answer that I'd like to give you is that this is sort of an American thing because we bought Artegraft in June of 2020, and we needed more sales reps when we bought them, and then all of this happened with the layoffs and then also the reps quitting as well. We've had this fortunate re-rack, and then we got to choose, okay, around the world, where would you put your reps if you could start over again?
For better or for worse, we had that option. This is a big change to the American sales force. I know you didn't exactly ask that question, but it does say, where did they go? Then how did we do that? I know, quick numbers here. We're going from 35, and I think David mentioned we're gonna be up 83% in rep headcount in the Americas when this is all over with, at something like, I'm doing quick math here, at 64 reps. Going from 35- 64, Rick.
We elected to go there for a very obvious reasons, which is now 67% of our sales are USA and Canada, and it used to be more like 50%, and that was because of the acquisition. Within the Americas, how did we do it? Yes, we're splitting states, we're splitting territories. First, we had to go back and fill in back to the 55 territories that we had always seen as 55 distinct places.
To put some meat on the bone here, a state like Michigan, we split. We only had Detroit, now we have Detroit and Grand Rapids. A state like North Carolina, we split. We only had Charlotte, now we have Charlotte, and we have Raleigh. A state like Georgia, we split. We used to just have Atlanta, now we have Atlanta and Macon and so on and so forth.
Those are three very obvious splits that you can understand. Going after the Americas and splitting states and, when you split states and when you place reps, the driver for us is where are their current sales, because you wanna be able to service those current sales.
At the very least, your sales rep is a helpful friendly face at the hospital helping take orders. At the best, they're there pushing product and doing things sort of on the offense. This nice thing, which is all this Artegraft revenue, I think we're telling you here we have $26 million of Artegraft revenue now annualized. You put that $26 million on top of the American business that used to be, I can't get the numbers right now, but I'm gonna go about $75 million before this, Rick. Putting them together, you have a chance to redo the whole Monopoly board.
It's been a nice. I mean, it's been a rough go for the regional managers with the layoffs, then with the hiring, but it's been a nice way to re-rack, and I think we've kinda gotten it right. When you move over to Europe, the change is less extreme. It's going from 33 reps at the bottom to 44 reps at the top when we're all set.
In Europe, it's been a little bit less about splitting geographies, but it's about going back after those capital cities that we had lost reps in that we always sort of wanted to cover, places like Birmingham, the U.K., stuff like Stockholm, stuff like Naples, things like that, these bigger cities that didn't have coverage. That's a bit of a ramble, Rick. You opened up a big topic. Maybe you come back at me and tell me what are the parts of the question you want me to pursue, in addition to that.
Yeah. I think that's incredibly excellent detail. I appreciate it, George. How do we think about the time to meaningful impact on the sales line? I mean, do we sort of, let's say, pending COVID recovery, is it like Q4 , Q1 , Q2
Right.
Not the similar run rates, and then we see sharply up into the right in the second half of next year, all things equal, as these folks start to get productive. Is that the right way to think about it?
Rick, I bet you've asked me that question and other analysts on this group 6 times over the years, and I'd probably always give you an unsatisfying answer.
Great.
My real answer is. I know, and I always do this, and I apologize for the fifth time now, but I'm gonna give you an unsatisfying answer of, we know you need reps. Things don't happen in this world without sales reps, without franchisees, if you will, in these various cities. You have to have them. When do they come on? I'll give you a real generic answer of quasi 6-9 months after you hire the guy or the woman. But sometimes you get one that jumps out, and the Raleigh rep is fantastic. Sometimes the Raleigh rep doesn't happen forever.
I'm gonna say at a median point, 6-9 months, but we don't know. I have always found it to be a little slower than people like me and you want it to be, but it then does happen over time.
Gotcha. Appreciate that. Back in the first half of this year, Q1 was a little slower. You had some backlog t hat helped the Q2 . I keep wondering whether we're seeing, for each company that's talking about the softer Q3 , is there a backlog of procedures? Do you have any sense that that could possibly okay, you lost $1 million to COVID in this quarter, that you gain that back in the Q4 . How are you thinking about that kind of thought?
I think it could add some upside to. I've watched a couple of these press releases from these companies also, and I think it could add a little upside to the various medical device companies. You probably have a bunch of CEOs that are shell-shocked. We came out of our shell on July 29. We're all excited to give you guys Q3 guidance. We even went and gave you Q4 guidance. We gave you annual guidance. Honestly, it all happened in August, and we were left going, oh geez, here's this thing again.
Maybe, and I would say, maybe this is affecting me and Jay, who are principally doing the guidance here, maybe we're a little bit burned from that, coming out of our shell in July, and now we're just , okay, here's your guidance. We don't know, is there another? I read in the newspaper the other day, there's this Delta. I don't mean to start a rumor here, sorry. I did read there's this Delta Plus thing going on elsewhere, and I'm like, oh gosh, what does that mean?
When we worked our guidance, Rick, we did not work in anything about a Delta Plus. We just assumed things were gonna kinda be okay over the next 3 months. We're also a little bit nervous about what could happen if something bad happens here. I think we all, every single one of us, personally and professionally, we know the second we try to guess, outguess COVID, we're wrong. I don't know what to say. At least we only have to guide for one quarter right now.
Yeah. No, that's very helpful. Thanks again.
Thanks, Rick.
Our next question comes from the line of Matt Mishan from KeyBanc Capital Markets. You may begin.
Good afternoon, George, Dave, JJ. This is Brett on the line for Matt. I think a lot of my questions were already asked, so I'll move to the balance sheet. Dave, really as it continues to strengthen, can you give some comment on how the M&A pipeline is currently looking and where you might be seeing the most potential opportunity?
Yeah. Hi, Brett. It's Dave. Good to hear you. The pipeline looks pretty good right now. We've got a few targets. They tend to be a little bit larger than some of the ones we did a while back, I don't know, in the $5 million-10 million range or north of that. They continue to be sort of in the center of the fairway, either open vascular surgery, disposables and implants. But also I think we're starting to look sort of to the left of the fairway, let's say in cardiac surgery or to the right in peripheral endovascular. We're always focused on niche-y, low rivalry markets.
Yeah, We're processing opportunities. I will say valuations are a little bit high these days. We see that with, obviously, the IHI is near an all-time high and, our neighbor down the street, Boston Scientific, they've been off buying some things at fairly high multiples, et cetera. That's a consideration, and we are valuation sensitive.
Yeah, we're out looking and it's not lost on us that we issued equity this summer and we've got a good bank account and no debt and a lot of capacity for a larger deal. We're out hunting, and we're gonna try to find it, but we won't do anything rash.
All right. Excellent. Just one more from me. I think you guys mentioned some price increases this quarter on the call. Can you provide a little bit of color on where you were able to implement those? If there's an initial view on how you're looking at the approach to pricing for 2022 versus historical trends? Thank you.
Sure. I don't know what we're talking about Q4 pricing. We almost always do our price increases on January 1, and so we do have some initial thoughts on that, but I feel like it's still being worked on internally. None of the hospitals know anything about what the pricing may be. I think I'm not supposed to be talking exactly about our pricing right now.
It's not particularly state secret type stuff, and I don't know when the letters go out to the hospital, it feels like about 2 weeks or so. Maybe after that, we can get you a copy of the pricing changes to the various analysts, if that's important.
All right. No worries. Completely understood. Thank you very much for taking the question.
Yep.
Our next question will come from the line of Javier Fonseca from Spartan Capital. You may begin.
Hi. Good afternoon. This is Javier Fonseca from Spartan Capital. Thanks for taking the question. This question is in regards to Artegraft. It's been over a year since the acquisition, and my question to management is, overall, how has Artegraft performed relative to your expectations? Could you provide more color on how you expect Artegraft to perform in Q4 and through 2022? Also, can you throw some numbers as far as how well Artegraft performed relative to allograft and valvulotomes, which were the lead products for Q3 ?
Javier, first of all, welcome to the LeMaitre call. It's great to hear your voice. This is Dave. Artegraft is going very well. When we acquired it about 16 months ago, the sales at the hospital level were $18.6 million. Now if you just take Q3 and annualize it's running in the $25 million-26 million range. It's definitely going ahead of the board model. The Q3 sales were up 15%.
Our normal practice on acquisitions is that, when we get beyond a year after the acquisition, we start to let that acquired company and product line fold into the overall LeMaitre mass. I'm not gonna necessarily walk through gross margins and operating contributions, but I will say, as Artegraft anniversaried, it was. Its gross margin was definitely north of the corporate gross margin, and it had an outsized contribution to operating profit.
I would say at a high level we are still consistent with that. I think from the top line perspective, it's going better than planned, and from the bottom line perspective, it's also going much better than planned. Do you wanna repeat then the next part of your question?
Of course. It was mentioned earlier in the call that Artegraft together with allograft and the valvulotomes were the key products driving revenue for Q3 . Could you put some numbers to those three products?
Artegraft, as we mentioned, was up 15%. It was the biggest dollar contributor to growth in Q3. Allografts were the second largest dollar contributor. They happen to be up 28% year-over-year. Valvulotomes were the third largest dollar contributor, up 5% year-over-year.
Could you share the actual dollar figure that each one brought in this quarter?
Do you have that in?
We know it's 0.3 for the valvulotome.
I've got that.
That's released already.
For RestoreFlow, it was about $2.9 million in the quarter, and valvulotomes about $7 million.
All right. Thank you very much.
Thanks a lot, Javier.
Our next question will come from the line of Brooks O'Neil from Lake Street Capital. You may begin.
Hey, good afternoon, guys. I guess the only question I can think of that hasn't been asked and answered is, supply chain impact on the business. Any disruptions there to speak of?
That's Brooks out there, right? This is George. That's Brooks?
Yes. Yes, George.
Nice to hear from you, Brooks.
Thank you.
Yeah, on the supply chain side, it's actually been okay so far. The back orders that we were focused on to our customer for the first 8 months of the year were largely CE-driven. We've had a little bit more of back orders, and by the way, the back orders are way down right now based on the CE being solved. We've had some back orders due to some small that we could say might be related to supply chain issues.
Remember, we manufacture almost all of our stuff in Burlington, Massachusetts, North Brunswick, New Jersey, and then out in Fox River Grove, Illinois. We only have right now one outside plant that we own in Lyon, France. We're not as affected, I think, by people that are bringing their products in and then shipping them to domestic customers. I would say pretty good so far. Now, on the finance side and the money side, JJ maybe commentary on if this is affecting anything inside the gross margin.
Yeah. I mean, there's a couple odd things that are going on, Brooks, like we're running out and buying 6 or 9 months worth of laptops, and sometimes we're running over to Target to get them, literally. There's some odd, quirky areas of our world where we're trying to find stuff and we can't get it. We've largely been able to do that. With respect more towards raw materials and the like, we've got a lot of inventory on hand. That's our MO, typically. If you look at our balance sheet, you'll say, "Why do you have so much inventory?"
It's all geared towards this being a no-back order company. As it turns out, that helps you in times like this. When you can't get a certain resin or you're looking for a certain piece of nitinol and you can't get it, well, you've probably got a decent amount on stock on hand that helps you mitigate all that. I would say yes, there are topics. We're running around behind the scenes, putting out odd little fires, but nothing that's really raised itself to the level of this.
There might be one exception, which is because of the CE mark topics not necessarily because of the supply chain issues. XenoSure for us is now being sourced for Europe from Australia, and the shipping for that is more expensive. We felt that variance come through the P&L and the gross margin is one of the things that's pushing the margin down a bit.
That's all that color is very helpful. I did think of one more thing. Obviously, you mentioned the CE mark coming through and all that. Are there any regulatory issues of note that you see that are impacting or you think might impact in the near term?
We're watching one other sort of subsidiary CE issue around this product called Omniflow. It might be a passing set of back orders in Q1 up to $300,000, Brooks. I don't think you'll notice that at your level around this company.
Yep.
As we got through the whole CE thing the official word is everything's perfect, everything's fine. We all know that's just the MDD world, and everyone's shifting now over to this thing called MDR. I would say if MDD is junior varsity, MDR is varsity, and we're about to have to switch and see if we can play varsity. That's coming at us, and that's gonna be a big story at all medical device companies through the final transition date, I think is May of 2024.
There's a lot of stuff. There's a lot of things that we need to get right by then, but we think we'll get them right, and we think we'll deliver that to the shareholders. That'll be a topic.
Okay. Thanks a lot for that.
Thanks a lot, Brooks.
Our next question will come from the line of Michael Petusky from Barrington Research. You may begin.
Hey, guys. Good evening. Two questions. I didn't catch if you guys said XenoSure, sort of the results there. I'd love revenue and either growth or decline on XenoSure. I know it's obviously an important product.
Yeah, Mike. We have a category called bovine patches, l et me grab that. It's about 6 t hat includes our VascuCel product as well as XenoSure, but it's largely Xeno. It's largely the answer you're looking for. $6.4 million in sales, up about 5%. That was a record bovine carotid patch quarter, I think it's notable. It didn't make it to the top 3 product lines, but in and of itself, it was a record quarter. Has a lot to do with the resolution of the CE issues around XenoSure going from Q2 when we got the CE mark to Q3 when we finally had sellable products.
There are, as of a week ago, no back orders on XenoSure at the company right now, and I would say that was stayed the same for the CE mark for 9 or 15 months.
Excellent. So JJ, I guess this is not necessarily a really short-term question, but more of a 12-24 months question, at least. In terms of gross margin you guys at one time, and I know the world has changed, but at one time were sort of 70% gross margins fairly consistently 69%, 70%, 71%. I guess I assumed when Artegraft sort of was fully integrated and sort of the accounting around that sort of annualized, that you guys would be pushing a little closer to that historical range, and now it feels well, maybe not.
I was just wondering if you could broadly, generally speak about expectations over the next , however long, 2, 3, 5 years. I mean, what you think.
Yeah.
Is realistic there?
Yeah. Really nice question, Mike. Thanks. It's something we've been thinking obviously more and more about here as we've sort of drifted down from the high 60%-70%, say, into the mid-60s. And there's a lot of topics, sort of contributing to this. I'm gonna reel off 5 or 6 of them, and then maybe we can talk about are they here to stay or where do they go going forward? That sort of gives us an idea of maybe where we're headed. Certainly higher payroll costs for manufacturing have a downward pressure on the margin.
You heard George say we've got a $20 minimum wage now, in the U.S., and that applies pretty directly to the manufacturing folks. As you give them goals every year, obviously that's a topic. We've increased manufacturing spend outside of payroll as well, and general operating expenses like indirect supplies and outside services. You heard me talk about freight related to XenoSure. We've been building out new clean rooms and improving clean rooms, and that depreciation then sort of comes onto the P&L, and so that puts some pressure on as well.
We've done thing number 3 , call it 3 or 4 lower margin acquisitions over the last 5-ish years, 4, 3-ish years, RestoreFlow, ProCol, Applied, and Cardial. You've heard us talk about those, and those are all in a state of improvement as we go forward. To the extent that we can make good on that'll certainly help the margin going forward, but it depresses it in the meantime.
Quality has been a more of a topic for us as well. We've spent more on that to make sure that our quality team has all the resources they need and has all the employees that they need, and that's obviously pushed on it as well. The E&O, number 6, we've talked about that a little bit at the beginning of the call. It feels to me like half of those, anyway, are transient. The manufacturing ones get worked on over time. While that's going on, you've got some good guys helping you as well.
We talked about improving sales, increasing sales prices at the beginning of the year, and certainly we talked about Artegraft this year, and we put a nice, healthy 20%+ price hike on Artegraft this year. Hopefully, next year we can do something, sort of robust in terms of price hikes there and with other product lines like valvulotomes, et cetera.
As those new clean rooms get built out and get used, and become more efficient, then that'll help our operating folks get more efficient with sort of the standard cost by product line because they're working in sort of nicer, cleaner, more efficient facilities, if you will. As those transfers are completed, like the Omniflow transfer that was recently sort of started up some production here in the U.S., but really isn't efficient yet. The same with the Syntel and Python, the Applied product, same topic there.
We started production, but not really necessarily efficient yet. Those will help going forward as well. There's a lot, s orry, I'm rambling there, Mike, but there's a lot of puts and takes. I feel like there's a good answer out there, but we're in a point right now where all of those 5 or 6 things that I talked about are sort of ganging up on me, but we'll get through pieces of them over time as we move forward.
Okay. Well, there's a lot going on.
I know. There's a lot in there. Yeah.
Okay. Fair enough. And just a quick one for George before I let the next person answer questions or ask a question. On the sales reps, obviously, for 2, 3, 4 quarters, it felt like not a lot getting done, and then all of a sudden, bang, you knocked out the feels like more than a dozen and a bunch more to come and all the rest of it. I guess my question is.
Mm-hmm.
You've sort of been intimately involved in terms of sales and, run that part of the business at times and all the rest. I mean, when you look at sort of the types of folks that you've signed on recently and that are, you're in talks with to sign on, I mean, is this sort of typical or is it more new folks than you would typically hire? Or any of these folks people that you sort of downsized during COVID? I'm just curious as to sort of the differences in terms of the hiring, the types of guys you're hiring, sales folks you're hiring versus historical? Thanks.
Okay. At a really high level, no, not at all. Then when we bumped up the starting salary by $10,000, there's a hint that maybe we can get after some better folks. In very specific answer, I think we rehired of all the people that got terminated or quit in the summer of 2020, I feel like about 4 or 5 came back, but that's not a lot of people compared to going from 79- 125. That's a what is that? 45 people or something like that. It's not too many people.
But yeah, we picked up 4 or 5 that had been here before. No, I don't see much of a difference between the ones we're hiring now and the ones we used to hire 2 years ago or so.
Just a quick one, and just going back to that question that you feel like you always give the same answer that nobody's happy with. The 4 or 5 that you rehired, should their ramp be a lot quicker or not really?
Yes, very clearly, they should just step right back into their job. Those 4 or 5 came on 2 or 3 months ago or even longer than that ago.
All right. Very good. Thank you.
Hey, Mike, before you go.
Yeah.
Depreciation and amortization, $2.925 million. Stock-based comp, $797 thousand, and CapEx, $1.815 million.
You just saved yourself a text. Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line of Scott Henry from ROTH Capital. You may begin.
Thank you and good afternoon. Most of my questions have been asked. I just had one sort of bigger picture question over the first 9 months of the year, which are admittedly a challenging time to figure out trends and whatnot. When we think about it, the Q1 , you were at the upper end of your guidance. The Q2 , you were well above your guidance range. Now the Q3 , you're below it. Even if we add $1 million back, you're kind of in the middle of it.
I'm just trying to get a sense of why you think it's trending that way, or maybe it's just noise or perhaps it's the. You're waiting for the more reps to come in. I just wanted to get your sense of that kind of trend versus expectations and how we should think about it going forward.
Okay. Hey, Scott, it's good to hear your voice. I would say, remember when we're back giving Q1 guidance, what is that? February 15 or something like that, February 20. Remember where everyone is, n o one's had a vaccine then. I think we were really scared about giving guidance in Q1. Okay, we beat it. I think we're still w e didn't do that well. Remember Q1, there was still a lot of. The winter COVID wave, particularly in the U.S., was pretty strong, and there was still a lot of muted results there.
I don't think we had a particularly great actual sales quarter forgetting about how we did. Yeah, it was $35.9 million. Forgetting about how we did against guidance, it was still. We were still surprised coming from Q4- Q1 that Q1, particularly January, was that cold and bad. I'm getting a little lost here, but I would say you gotta always remember where we were in terms of vaccines and guidance for that. Then we just blew it out in Q2 versus guidance and versus anything. I think that was.
We think that was the rush of people back into these hospitals. Maybe JJ and I got a little bit over our skis and a little bit overconfident on July 29, thinking that all that goodness that we saw from Q2 was gonna get repeated in Q3. Yeah, okay, maybe you can even say, well, without Delta, we just matched our guidance.
Maybe we were more confident about our numbers for Q3, and that had been the first time that we had any confidence about the numbers. Certainly that did not apply to Q1 and Q2. We were all quite scared about what was coming at us.
Scott, I would say, as part author of the guidance, I just feel like there's more volatility these days, right? For a period of time, folks didn't even wanna give guidance. We tried to come back early with guidance for you guys because we figured even if we're gonna be wrong, at least you can hear what we think, and then you can make your own judgments from there. It's just a little bit more hurly burly and a little bit more chunky.
I don't know that there's a trend or anything systemic going on. I just feel like we're taking our best shots and then stuff happens. The volatility is a lot sort of wider than it used to be. I think it's that simple, really.
Okay, thank you for that color and for reviewing the trajectory through that. It is helpful. Thank you for taking the question.
Thanks a lot, Scott.
Thank you. We have a follow from the line of Anthony Petrone from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Thanks and thanks for taking the follow-up here. Just wanna jump back in on Artegraft, two quick follow-ups. The first would be just to recap on how the price increase was sort of viewed in the marketplace and was there any drop off on accounts? I suspect there was not. Then secondly, just as we look out for Artegraft and you think of share between a biologic graft versus synthetic grafts within the hemodialysis sort of landscape, where do you think biologic grafts could go as a percent of total versus synthetic grafts over time? Thanks.
Yeah. This is Dave Roberts. Artegraft, obviously we put a fairly sizable price increase, as JJ mentioned, on 1 January 2021. When we examine the market in our due diligence we've been watching this product for nearly 20 years in our space, we felt like there was a pricing opportunity. Probably the number one competitor is a synthetic piece of PTFE with heparin bonded to it, which was selling for a much higher price and really didn't have the features and benefits and patency of Artegraft.
That gave us the confidence to put the price increase in January 1. I would say maybe in January we felt a little bit of a slowdown as hospitals were pushing the price increase through their committees, et cetera. By February and March, I feel like we didn't lose any customers, and we effectively captured the entire price increase.
When we did increase the price, we didn't really increase it as much as we could have. We do think there's a little bit more room for a price increase still. We don't wanna be overly aggressive about it, but we do think there could be room in January again. We're examining that right now. In terms of the algorithm of grafts in AV fistulas which get accessed and cannulated for dialysis is infection. Those needles going in and out of the grafts 3 times a week.
Of course, the huge advantage of Artegraft as a biologic, as a xenograft, is that it's xenografts and Biologics are better at preventing and fighting infection than synthetic grafts. We do think over time, we've seen a migration in access to the biologic grafts. Just like in biologic patches, we were observing that, and after we acquired XenoSure many, many years ago. We do think that in the long term, biologics probably will win and continue to win against PTFE.
However, some surgeons prefer PTFE, and that will be around for a long time. We believe in the long haul, the biologic grafts will win out. Within that category, there are xenografts and allografts. The advantage of a xenograft like Artegraft is it's generally about half the price of an allograft, which of course comes from a human cadaver. We think there's probably a compelling proposition to the physician and the hospital, when you wrap all of that up.
Very helpful. Thank you.
Thank you. With that, I'm not showing any further questions in the queue. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. I would like to thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.