Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Medtronic Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. And after the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Thank you. I will now turn the conference over to Mr.
Ryan Weispfenning, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Crystal. Good morning and welcome to Medtronic's Q3 conference call and webcast. During the next hour, Omar Ishrak, Medtronic Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Karen Parkhill, Medtronic Chief Financial Officer will provide comments on the results of our Q3, which ended on January 26, 2018. After our prepared remarks, we will be happy to take your questions. First, a few logistical comments.
Earlier this morning, we issued a press release containing our financial statements and a revenue by division summary. We also issued an earnings presentation that provides additional details on our performance and outlook. During this earnings call, many of the statements made may be considered forward looking statements, and actual results might differ materially from those projected in any forward looking statement. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ is contained in our periodic reports and other filings that we make with the SEC, we do not undertake to update any forward looking statement. In addition, the reconciliations of any non GAAP financial measures are available on our website, investorrelations.
Medtronic.com. Unless we say otherwise, references to quarterly results increasing or decreasing are in comparison to the Q3 of fiscal year 2017 and rates and ranges are given on a comparable constant currency basis, which adjusts for our recent patient care, DVT and nutritional insufficiency divestiture as well as the impact of foreign currency. These adjustment details can be found in the reconciliation tables included with our earnings press release. Finally, other than as noted, our EPS growth and guidance does not include any charges or gains that would be reported as non GAAP adjustments to earnings during the fiscal year. With that, I'm now pleased to turn the call over to Medtronic Chairman Chief Executive Officer, Omar Ishrak.
Good morning, and thank you, Ryan, and thank you to everyone for joining us. This morning, we reported our 3rd quarter financial results, including revenue of $7,400,000,000 representing growth of 7%. Q3 non GAAP operating profit grew 8% and non GAAP diluted earnings per share were $1.17 growing 12% and representing EPS leverage of 580 basis points. These results reflect a solid quarter for Medtronic. And as we expected, a strong turnaround from the first half of the fiscal year.
We continue to execute in our broad sustainable growth strategy, driving therapy innovation and global market penetration, while delivering enterprise synergies to enable margin improvement. Each of our 4 groups delivered strong results with mid single digit revenue growth in MITG and RTG, high single digit growth in CVG and low teens growth in diabetes. Geographically, we also had a strong diversified performance with mid single digit growth in the U. S. And non U.
S. Developed markets and low double digit growth in emerging markets. At the same time, we completed our $850,000,000 Covidien synergy commitment. We recently launched a new program, Enterprise Excellence, designed to increase our effectiveness and enable reinvestment for growth, along with driving continued margin expansion and EPS leverage. As we look ahead, we are confident in our ability to deliver meaningful EPS leverage on mid single digit revenue growth this fiscal year, just as we have for the past 5 fiscal years.
In Therapy Innovation, we're seeing a clear acceleration driven by several important new product launches across our 4 groups as well as our strong positions in some of the fastest growing therapies in medtech. Our cardiac and vascular group grew 7% again this quarter, delivering sustained growth by leveraging the breadth of its products services as well as its strong positions in important rapidly expanding markets. CVG's impressive new products in infection control, diagnostics, transcatheter pacemakers and AF solutions generated combined growth in the mid-20s and now represent about a third of our cardiac rhythm and heart failure division. Mid teens growth in our coronary and structural heart division was led by the launch of our Resolute Onyx drug eluting stent in the U. S.
And Japan as well as our high growth transcatheter valve business. TAVR, we grew in the low 30s with mid-20s growth in the U. S. And low-40s growth in international markets, driven by the strong global demand for our Evolut Pro valve and expanded indications for use. Our minimally invasive therapies group grew 6%, driven by 7% growth in surgical innovations with strength in new products, including our Signia powered surgical stapling system, our new LiguShore vessel sealing instruments and our ValleyLab FT10 energy platform.
Respiratory, gastrointestinal and renal grew 3%, driven by broad based growth in GI and hepatology, strength in Nellcorpulse oximetry sensors given the high incidence of flu in the U. S. And strong adoption of our MicroStream capnography monitoring products. This offset a decline in our Airway and Ventilation business. We're enthusiastic about the development of our surgical robotics platform, which we expect will strengthen our strategy of advancing minimally invasive procedures, and we continue to make progress towards its launch.
While we had intended first clinical use in humans in the next couple of months, our final software and hardware integration and testing is taking longer than we initially expected. This is not unusual with systems of this complexity. We're excited about the product performance that we're already seeing and intend to update time lines as we near the commercial launch. At our Investor Day in June, we intend to share incremental details on our system and update you on our progress. As we have mentioned before, the expectation of meaningful revenue from the system will be dependent on regulatory approval in developed markets.
Regardless, we remain confident in our ability to grow MITG in the mid single digits next year and over the longer term. Our Restorative Therapies group grew 5% this quarter with robust growth in our Brain and Pain divisions. In Brain, the strength of our entire stroke portfolio drove high teens growth in neurovascular and strong sales of our StealthStation navigation and O arm imaging technologies led to low double digit growth in neurosurgery. In pain, we're seeing very positive customer reaction from our Intellis platform and our evolved workflow algorithm, which together drove high single digit growth, reversing the declines we've seen for several quarters. While our spine division was flat this quarter, it was in line with the global spine market.
Growth in BNP continued to offset declines in CoreSpine. Also when coupling our spine revenue with the spine enabling technologies that are reported in our neurosurgery business, our combined revenue grew over 1%. We believe this is a more relevant comparison of our spine results against our competition and an indication of our overall growth in spine procedures. We attribute this growth to the ongoing success of our surgical synergy strategy, which combines our enabling technologies such as imaging, navigation, powered instruments, nerve monitoring and Mazor Robotics with our spine implants to deliver integrated procedures. As expected, diabetes returned to double digit growth this quarter, driven by the continued adoption of our MiniMed 670 gs Hybrid Closed Loop System in the U.
S. We now have over 20,000 patients in our 670 gs system and continue to receive highly positive feedback from patients on this groundbreaking technology with real world results consistent with those reported in our pivotal study. Our growth was further enhanced by the strong international demand for our 640 gs system, Our sensor attachment rates with all of our 6 Series systems globally remain strong. And as we continue to shift our customer base from standalone pumps to sensor augmented pumps, we expect sensors to be a key component of our growth. Our efforts to increase our sensor capacity are progressing well.
We are now able to meet the sensor demand of our existing customer base and remain on track to fully meet our predicted demand from both existing and new users in the Q4. In addition, we benefited in the quarter from consumable revenue from legacy Animas users and of Animas users to Medtronic continue to progress well. We're also excited about the prospects of our standalone CGM system Guardian Connect. Outside the U. S, we see strong utilization and retention of patients in the system.
And with the expected increase in our sensor manufacturing capacity, we are preparing to increase our customer base. In the U. S, we've been closely collaborating with the FDA and expect to bring this innovative technology to market shortly. Coriant Connect features unique predictive alerts. And in the U.
S, we'll utilize SugarIQ with the cognitive computing capability of IBM Watson to detect important patterns and trends for people with diabetes. Turning now to our globalization growth strategy. Emerging Markets, which represents 15% of our revenue, again grew 12%, in line with our long term double digit growth expectations. Our consistent emerging market performance continues to benefit from geographic diversification with strong balanced results around the globe. Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa and China all grew double digits.
In addition to investing in traditional market development, our differentiated strategies of participating in public and private partnerships as well as optimizing our distribution channels are driving our sustained performance. Emerging markets represent the single largest opportunity in medtech. Our remaining growth strategy, economic value, is a real accelerator for our therapy innovation and globalization strategies. We're pleased with our continued progress in creating new value based business models that directly link our therapies to improving outcomes. We now have over 1,000 hospitals under contract and over 25% of our U.
S. CRHF implantables revenue is covered under a TYRX related value based care arrangement that links total payment to patient infection outcomes. Beyond TYRX, we've also commercialized 5 other value based health care programs, covering various therapies including ICDs, CRTs, AF ablation, drug coated balloons and aortic stem grafts, where a portion of our payment is tied to specific patient outcomes. Collectively, these 5 programs, in addition to TYRX, cover over $650,000,000 in mostly U. S.-based device revenue.
Across Medtronic, we remain focused on leading the shift to healthcare brewing systems that reward value and improve patient outcomes over volume. We're increasingly partnering with additional stakeholders in the healthcare value chain, including payers, providers and other interested organizations to lead the change from fee for service models to value based programs. It is our strong belief that Medtronic is uniquely positioned to leverage our global technical, clinical and disease state expertise to deliver better outcomes to patients while improving efficiency for healthcare systems around the world. And we're doing this in a way that we expect to benefit our shareholders as well. With that, let me ask Karen to now take you through a discussion of our Q3 financials and outlook for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Karen?
Thank you, Omar. As mentioned, our 3rd quarter revenue of $7,369,000,000 represented a 1% increase as reported and growth of 7% on a comparable constant currency basis, which adjusts for both foreign currency and the patient care DVT nutritional insufficiency divestiture. Foreign currency had a positive $177,000,000 impact on 3rd quarter revenue. GAAP diluted loss per share was $1.03 Non GAAP earnings per share were $1.17 After adjusting for the divestiture and the $0.01 negative impact from foreign currency, non GAAP diluted EPS grew 12%. The majority of our non GAAP adjustments were driven by a $2,200,000,000 tax charge primarily related to the transition tax on our accumulated foreign earnings as part of U.
S. Tax reform. This tax will be paid over the next 8 years with less of a cash impact in the 1st 5 years. Medtronic has been advocating for U. S.
Tax reform for many years and we are pleased that the final package included the ability to gain access to our future earnings outside the United States. We now will have access to the vast majority of our cash flow and we expect to deploy it with discipline in accordance with our capital allocation strategy of balancing reinvestment for future growth and providing meaningful returns for our shareholders. The operating margin for the quarter was 28.8% on a comparable constant currency basis, representing a year over year improvement of 30 basis points. This was primarily driven by a 40 basis point improvement in SG and A. As announced last month, we reached our goal of delivering $850,000,000 of synergies from the Covidien acquisition.
We also unveiled our enterprise excellence plan that is expected to deliver over $3,000,000,000 in annual growth run rate savings over the next 5 years. We expect this to enable reinvestment for future growth as well as drive continued operating margin expansion and EPS leverage. Non expense, which is included in our operating margin, was $94,000,000 versus $20,000,000 on a comparable basis in the prior year. This change was driven primarily by increased expense related to our currency hedging program. Foreign exchange in total had an approximate 90 basis point negative impact on our operating margin.
This was more than expected given current currency market volatility in the last month of the quarter, which resulted in a large foreign exchange impact on our inventory in late January as well as increased expense due to net balance sheet remeasurements on certain foreign currency denominated balances. These were also the primary reason for the mismatch between the FX benefit on our revenue and FX headwind on EPS. Our 3rd quarter non GAAP nominal tax rate was 15.6%. Based on our current estimates of the impact of U. S.
Tax reform, we continue to expect our 4th quarter tax rate to be between 15% 16%. 3rd quarter average daily shares outstanding on a non GAAP diluted basis were 1,365,000,000 shares. As expected, this was roughly flat sequentially and we expect our share count to remain roughly flat for the remainder of the fiscal year. Combining our $1,600,000,000 of year to date share repurchase activity with the $1,900,000,000 we paid in dividends over the same period, our total payout ratio was 76% on non GAAP net income. Before turning the call back to Omar, I would like to reiterate our annual revenue and EPS growth guidance.
Unless specified, all of my guidance comments are comparable constant currency. For the full fiscal year, we continue to expect revenue growth to be in the range of 4% to 5% and non GAAP diluted earnings per share to grow in the range of 9% to 10% from the prior year comparable of $4.37 For the 4th quarter, we would expect total company revenue growth to be in the range of 4.5% to 5.5%. Looking at the expected 4th quarter revenue growth by our business groups, we expect CVG to deliver 4.5% to 5.5% growth and MITG to grow in the range of 3% to 3.5%, both driven by continued strength from new products amidst more difficult 4th quarter comparisons. We expect RTG to grow in the range of 3% to 4%, balancing the impact of a slower spine market with continued growth in pain therapies and strength in brain therapies. Finally, in our diabetes group, as we have been forecasting for some time, we expect double digit growth in the Q4 given increased sensor supply and the strength of the 670 gs launch in the United States.
With respect to earnings, we delivered strong EPS leverage in the 3rd quarter and we expect this to continue in the 4th with EPS growth of 11% to 13% off the prior year comparable of 1.25 dollars While the impact from currency is fluid and therefore not something we forecast, if recent exchange rates remain stable for the fiscal year, Our full year revenue would be positively affected by approximately $480,000,000 to $500,000,000 including an approximate $300,000,000 to $320,000,000 tailwind in the 4th quarter. Our full year operating margin would be negatively affected by approximately 70 basis points, including approximately 150 basis points in the 4th quarter. And our full year EPS would be negatively affected by approximately 0 point 0 $4 including a negative impact of approximately 0 point 0 $2 in the 4th quarter. Keep in mind the effect of FX on revenue, margin and EPS can differ due to the magnitude of the year over year change in expense related to our currency hedging program along with the timing difference of FX and cost of goods sold reflecting inventory turns on our balance sheet. While we intend to give our fiscal year 2019 guidance on our Q4 earnings call in May, the fiscal year 2019 commentary that I provided on last quarter's earnings call still stands.
Also, while we expect to continue to drive operating margin improvement and EPS leverage, Keep in mind the following headwinds to our projected EPS growth. We expect less interest income reflecting planned positioning of our investments for greater flexibility and liquidity in support of capital allocation. We will anniversary the full year benefit from the accounting change on stock based compensation. And we expect to begin to transition services related to our divestiture to Cardinal Health, eliminating the income in the back half of the fiscal year. Combined, this could amount to a few 100 basis point headwind to EPS growth, which we will be working to partially offset.
In addition, given recent changes to exchange rates, if current exchange rates remain stable through next fiscal year, we would now expect an approximate $500,000,000 positive impact to fiscal year 2019 revenue and over $0.10 of benefit to EPS. Finally, I would like to note that we plan to hold our biennial Institutional Investor and Analyst Day on Tuesday, June 5 in New York City. Now I will return the call back to Omar.
Thanks, Karen. And to conclude, Q3 was a solid quarter where our innovation and technology, strong positions in the fastest growing markets in medtech and enterprise synergies produced solid returns. We've driven a strong turnaround from our first results, and we remain confident in our ability to deliver mid single digit revenue growth and meaningful EPS leverage this fiscal year and beyond. We expect this to lead to robust free cash flow generation that we can deploy with discipline. Finally, we remain keenly focused in executing to deliver dependable results for you, our shareholders, as we continue to leverage our global diversification and scale to fulfill our mission of alleviating pain, restoring health and extending life for millions of people around the world.
Let's now open the phone lines for Q and A. In addition to Karen, I've asked Mike Coyle, President of CVG Bob White, President of MITG Jeff Martha, President of RTG and Hooman Hakimi, President of our diabetes group to join us. We want to try to get to as many people as possible, so please help us by limiting yourself to only one question and if necessary a related follow-up. If you have additional questions, please contact Ryan and our Investor Relations team after the call. And with that, operator, first question
please. And our first question comes from the line of Bob Hopkins with Bank of America.
Thanks for taking the question. I appreciate it. A quick question for Karen and then for Omar. First, Karen, just to start off, thank you for the preliminary thoughts you're providing on 2019. Since I know I'm going to get a lot of questions on it as I assume everybody else where I just want to make sure I want to hear exactly what you're saying.
My interpretation of what I just heard is that perhaps the FX benefit is roughly offsetting some of those incremental headwinds you talked about and that perhaps high single digit earnings growth is a rough preliminary way to think about 2019. So is it fair to say that some of those headwinds you mentioned will be offset by FX and that roughly high single digits is a good preliminary way to think about 2019 earnings?
Yes, that's roughly in line, Bob, at this stage. We're still working on our annual planning process and we will give guidance on our Q4 call in May, but your summary is roughly right.
Okay. Thank you for that. And then, Omar, I wanted to ask you about revenue growth because obviously this is some of the best and most balanced revenue growth we've seen out of Medtronic for some time. So congratulations on that. I guess my question would be from a macro perspective, can you talk a little bit about maybe about the drivers of the growth?
How much of this was just particularly strong execution and new products versus strong markets? Were there any significant one time benefits in Q3? Maybe talk from a macro perspective about the revenue growth in the quarter and the sustainability.
Well, like I've always mentioned, the our revenue performance is highly dependent on new product launch process. And when we've got new products, the revenue growth goes up quite significantly, especially with respect to the market. Overall, the market has no real major changes since before. We expect what we said in November is about still holds the same in terms of surgical procedures and in terms of other procedures. Some elective procedures in diabetes in particular have a ramp up in December, which then tails down in January.
So these are all normal patterns. I think the only thing that I'll point out is, of course, that we're pleased with the diabetes business as promised and expected with the sensor shortage issue being addressed, bounced to double digit growth, which clearly just on its own helps. The other thing I'll point out actually is our pain division, where again we've been experiencing declines in growth. And this quarter, we came up to high single digits, which based on new product introductions. So those 2 are the outstanding drivers.
I mean CVG as usual performed and this was a particularly good quarter with a variety of new products, which I detailed. And MITG continued with their introduction of products. So really product pipeline introduction is the main driver that we see in this performance and we're quite pleased with what we've seen.
Great. Thank you.
Thanks, Bob. Can we get the next question please, Crystal?
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Weinstein with JPMorgan.
Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Just a couple of items to clarify. So last quarter Puerto Rico was about a $60,000,000 headwind to the business. How much of that do you think you got back this quarter?
And then second, just I think we're probably all a bit surprised by the reduction in the EPS guidance because of FX this quarter. You comment on there in your prepared remarks that the 4th quarter will see 150 basis point headwind to operating margins because of that effect. That's pretty severe. So could you just spend a minute on that and maybe just help people with, I guess, 1, why the FX impact got worse despite the weakening of the dollar from last call? And 2, why it's so severe on this Q4?
Thanks.
Sure, Mike. Thanks for the questions. So on Puerto Rico, we did realize some incremental revenue from Hurricane Maria in the Q3, but it was relatively minor. So the vast majority of the 7% growth in Q3 was related to improved underlying financial performance. In terms of foreign exchange, this quarter given the significant volatility in foreign exchange rates, particularly in the last month of the quarter, we did have an impact on our balance sheet from a remeasurement perspective of certain balances late in the quarter.
And then we also did have an impact to our inventory, which given inventory turns take some time to run through cost of goods sold. That said for Q4, we do expect to have a continued foreign exchange headwind both on margin and the bottom line in the 4th quarter. We expect in Q4 on the bottom line to have FX if rates remain stable to where they are today of negative $0.02 for the 4th quarter. While we do have a period right now where foreign exchange is benefiting revenue, given the roll off of our hedging program, we are seeing continued slight negative headwind to the bottom line. Next year, with the strength of the dollar and the roll off of most of our older hedging hedges, we do expect a foreign currency benefit both on revenue and expense.
And we mentioned at this stage if rates remain stable for FY 2019, a positive impact on revenue up to 500,000,000 dollars and over $0.10 impact positively on EPS.
Thanks, Karen. And maybe just one follow-up on cash flow. Karen, your guidance and it seemed to imply that you would do about $4,300,000,000 in free cash flow this year. And that's again going back to that FY 2016 base and then adjusting it for the divestiture. You've done $2,800,000,000 year date.
Is the expectation that you'll get to that, call it, roughly $4,300,000,000 target? Thanks.
Yes. Thanks for the question. We do have a slide in our slide deck on cash flow and you'll see free cash flow operating free cash flow year to date of 3,600,000,000 year to date. And the guidance still stands for the full fiscal year where we expect to deliver high single digit growth on a multiyear basis from 2016 to 2018, which would equate to approximately the cash flow forecast that you mentioned.
Great. Thank you, Karen.
Yes. Thanks, Mike. Can we get the next question, Crystal, please?
Our next question comes from the line of David Lewis with Morgan Stanley.
Great. Good morning. Just two questions, one for Omar, one for Karen. Omar, just want to come back to revenue momentum. Obviously, very strong quarter here in the 3rd.
If I think at the top end of your guidance, it sort of implies 5.5% for the 4th quarter, but also your commentary implies some deceleration in franchises like CVG and RTG. So were there any one time dynamics in the Q3 or pull forward because of the hurricane dynamics or perhaps the Q4 reflects some type of conservatism?
Well, I think the hurricane dynamics were relatively minor. I mean, there was some of that, but really that was relatively minor on the overall base of our revenue. I think in Q4, it's mainly tougher comparisons year over year that are driving this. In some areas like diabetes, we expect continued strength. And I think CVG has had a strong high almost high single digit growth rate over past several quarters and we're running into a tougher comparison in Q4.
So that's lower than it has been running, but still well in the mid single digits as we expect. I think with MITG, what you saw in Q4 was a slight enhancement because of our sales in the pulse oximetry business because of the flu season, which was and the requirement for that product was particularly high even given historical levels. That's going to tail down in Q4. So that's dampening the growth a little bit. I think those are the key dynamics that I'm looking at.
It's still well in the mid single digit, well in guidance, and we expect to close the year in the range that we had talked about in a fairly tough year.
Okay. So continued momentum and no major changes across your key franchises, it sounds like, in the Q4?
That's correct. Yes. It's just the quarter over quarter dynamics and some one off issues here and there.
Okay. And then Karen, just
as I said next year's outlook and I appreciate the comments you provide, just two sort of follow-up questions here. We don't have great numbers, but it looks like underlying margin performance for fiscal 2018 looks like it will come in somewhere around that 30, 50 basis point range, perhaps 40 basis points of underlying margins. How do you think that number trends into next year? Can you do better than 30, 40 basis points of underlying margin improvement in fiscal 2019? Is it possible at all to give us some range on the net change in hedging accounting into fiscal 2019 because that's sort of the big change on a relative basis?
Thanks so much.
Okay. Sure. Thanks for the questions. In terms of margin benefit for FY 2018, you're correct. We did deliver on a constant currency basis 30 basis points of margin improvement this quarter and would expect that momentum to continue to drive full year margin benefit to be higher than what we had this quarter.
In terms of next fiscal year, we do intend to continue to drive operating margin improvement and strong EPS leverage Based on current exchange rates where they are right now, we would expect a positive impact to the bottom line from FX and also not a headwind on margins, then potentially positive benefit on margins too. So we will obviously give our guidance on the Q4 earnings call, but I would expect continued positive momentum on margin from here, particularly driven by our enterprise excellence program, which we announced at the JPMorgan conference.
Great. Thanks, Karen. Thanks, Omar.
Thank you. Thanks, David. Next question please, Crystal.
Our next question comes from the line of Vijay Kumar with Evercore ISI.
Nice quarter here guys. So maybe my first one, Omar, and maybe my colleague can add to this. Value based, Kiara, this is something you've spoken ad nauseam, Omar. It just feels like we're getting more traction. We had some numbers on the revenues.
Rhythm management, right, where a lot of the street is concerned on this comparative dynamics, you have a huge trial we have coming in, the RAPID trial. Can you talk about how those value based contracts and particularly in CRM, Kyrex would change once you get the trial readout? And are we could this possibly lead to more share gains and positive growth in that business in a few quarters?
I know I've spoken a lot about value based health care, but I'm particularly pleased to see this translate into real numbers, which have real differentiating value for Medtronic. And the person who's led that actually is Mike Coyle in CVG. And while Tarex is one example, where our innovation is linked directly to an outcome and we built a business model around it, we've actually got 4 or 5 other programs, which are equally interesting. We're in the starting phases. But I'll let Mike just comment overall on the subject and also answer the specific question on TYRX.
Sure. Relative to TYRX, we're quite pleased with the level of uptake that we're seeing and with over 1,000 hospitals now participating in the program, where we actually have linkage back to essentially make a payment that will go to the account if the patient comes back with a device related infection within 6 months. And I think what that has been able to do is, TYRX is not separately reimbursed. And so by doing this, we've been able to create a guarantee that basically is very appealing to accounts who know that they will obviously have a patient who is significantly impacted by an infection, they will lose money at the provider level, at the hospital level because of that redo procedure that's required. And of course, the payer is now out 2 separate procedures for payment.
So this really is a win win win the way we have structured it and I think it's being seen that way by the accounts. But it also allowed us by being able to see the appeal of this approach to then apply it to numerous other parts of our business, including reductions in heart failure rehospitalization with adaptive CRT, a feature of our CRT devices, our SmartShok performance guarantee program, which basically pays when patients come back with inappropriate shocks from an ICD, The drug coated balloon, re intervention prevention program, which basically ties to patients coming back for target lesion redos in SFA disease. And then in our cryoablation business, basically we have a program that pays for patients coming back with either repeat hospitalizations for AF or for repeat procedures for the ablation. And so collectively these programs have now been rolled out really just in the last year since the TYRX program really got momentum in January a year ago. And these newer programs are really only a quarter or 2 old.
But as we mentioned in the script, we have over $650,000,000 of revenue mostly in the U. S. Tied to these programs and we continue to see opportunities to do more of them.
Maybe one follow-up on cap allocation. Karen, so now you have access to $14,000,000,000 plus of cash. And I think you mentioned for 2019 fiscal 2019 less interest income. So I'm just curious wouldn't debt pay down offset some of that or can you just walk us through the math on how that cash is going to be used and why it should be an interest income headwind for next year?
Sure. So, yes, we do have $14,000,000,000 of cash on our balance sheet and we have access to the vast majority of that post tax reform. I think the biggest benefit to us will be the access to our ongoing cash generation though going forward. But with respect to the existing cash on the balance sheet, we have been paying down debt this year. We have another $2,000,000,000 of debt to mature in the Q4 this year, which we expect to let retire.
And we also have the And so we're hopeful and feel strongly about our position there. But should the appeals court uphold the prior settlement, it does mean that we would have to pay a large tax settlement from that transaction. So the greatest benefit again is our access to our ongoing cash generation going forward.
Thank you, guys.
Thanks, Vijay. Crystal, next question please.
Our next question comes from the line of Larry Biegelsen with Wells Fargo.
Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. 2 pretty straightforward questions. I'll ask them both now. Karen, I'm sorry if I missed this, but the tax rate in fiscal 2019, are you assuming 100 basis points to 100 basis points improvement over fiscal 2018?
Sorry if I missed that earlier on. And Omar, I was struck when I looked at the JPMorgan slides in January, how few tuck in M and A deals you've done in fiscal 2018 versus prior year. So I guess my question is, why is that the case? And anything any color you can provide on what we should expect going forward would be helpful? Thank you.
Okay. Let me take the acquisition one first. A number of things. First of all, we do acquisitions when it meets certain guidelines. That means we're we think that the acquisition will add to our strategies, which are very clear in the disease areas that we've got especially tuck in acquisitions, in the disease areas that we've got presence in and fills out our overall capabilities.
We've got to have the management bandwidth and the financial bandwidth to do the deal. And if there's an interesting acquisition, we do it. And we haven't been shy from doing some reasonably big ones in the past 2 years. I think the improved access to cash that we'll have with the new tax reform will actually help open our financial bandwidth in doing some of these deals. But remember, they all go together.
There's financial bandwidth, there's management bandwidth, and most importantly the strategic alignment of the tuck in acquisition and our ability to integrate it properly with the right team. And I wouldn't read too much into any particular year. It's really overall we've created a pretty good track record of doing these and we intend to continue.
And Larry on the tax rate question, our initial estimates indicated that we would benefit from a slightly lower effective tax rate beginning in fiscal year 2019. We did not give the basis point improvement, but we did say we expected it to be slightly lower. We continue to work through the complexity of new reform and additional guidelines that come out from the U. S. Treasury to refine our estimates.
And certainly, if in that process our initial estimates change, we'll certainly let you know. But at this stage, we expect a slightly lower effective tax rate.
Thanks for taking the questions, guys.
Thank you, Larry. Crystal, next question please.
Our next question comes from the line of Kristen Stewart with Deutsche Bank.
Hi, thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to go back on the comments on the robotics platform. I was just wondering if you could expand upon any of those comments that you made earlier, just going on what exactly are some of the delays there?
Well, like I said, Kristen, that's a fairly complicated system with multiple computers being put together. And it's one that we've had some experience And when you integrate a system of this level of complexity, there may be some time line shifts as to when we'll be ready for 1st in human use. And so it's taken just a little longer than we thought earlier. We're very excited about what we're seeing. I mean, we've seen this thing operate, and the performance is very compelling.
I think it's best if we wait till Investor Day when we'll give you some more insight as to the nature of this product, which we are really excited about. And also as we get closer to commercial launch, we'll give you some dates. So I think that's the best way to look at it. Make no mistake, this product is an outstanding product. And the sorts of integration hiccups you get are not uncommon at all with systems of this magnitude and one that we know will get through and will be ready for launch at a suitable time.
Okay. But you said do you still expect first in human use to be when?
No. Look, we're not at a stage to give you dates like that. Once we wait till Investor Day, then we'll give you an update on our overall performance. And really, we'll stick to time lines when we are close to commercial launch.
Okay. And then just a question on diabetes franchise. Can you give an update on the continued glucose monitor?
Sure.
Yes. Go ahead.
Hi, Kristen. The sensor ramp up is actually progressing well. It was a key contributor to our growth rate in Q3. Just to maybe put some additional color on it, our Guardian Sensor 3 production in the 3rd quarter was twice as high as what we experienced in the Q2. So that should give you an indication of how things are progressing.
And as the commentary alluded to, we're on track to fulfill all the needs, the sensor needs of our installed base this quarter. And by the end of this quarter, we'll be able to meet unconstrained demand as we have been saying all along. Now the other thing I'll just point out is that the performance of the sensor itself, not just the capacity, but as Omar talked about in the commentary, the MARDs that we are seeing on over 20,000 patients in the installed base is fantastic and continues to really essentially mirror what we saw in the pivotal trial. So we're very pleased, not just in terms of the output, but also the quality of the sensor.
Okay, perfect. So just timing in the U. S?
For the Guardian Connect standalone?
Yes.
Yes. That one is with the FDA. Kristen, we are very confident that we're going to be able to get this out shortly. It's hard to predict exactly when the FDA is going to approve it, but we're working very closely with them and all indications are that we'll have an approval here in short order.
Okay.
Thanks very much everyone.
Thanks, Kristen. We'll take the next question please, Crystal.
Your next question comes from the line of Isaac Ro with Goldman Sachs.
Good morning, guys. Thank you. Kristen, question for you on the $3,000,000,000 gross cost savings goal that you guys have set. If I look correctly at the slide, FY 2018 was the base year. And so now that you guys are most of the way through year 1, could you give us a sense of what net savings have been to date just so we can try and triangulate how that's translating into margins over time?
Sure, Isaac. On the $3,000,000,000 gross savings, we do expect annually incrementally between $500,000,000 to $700,000,000 each year over the 5 year period. So next year you can expect that incremental savings. Not all of it will fall to the bottom line because we will be focused on using some of it to offset pricing pressure and to reinvest. But it is this program that will drive that strong margin improvement and EPS leverage that we have talked about.
In terms of the go ahead.
No, I'm sorry, you were speaking.
In terms of the $500,000,000 to 700,000,000 dollars annual incremental each year, expect it to be more in the lower half of that range in the beginning years and more in the upper half of that range in the
net savings that you
expect out of this program, either a cumulative or on net savings that you expect out of this program, either a cumulative or on an annual basis?
Yes. We will be talking about every year when we give annual guidance, the net savings that at least the impact that we would expect to see from a top to a bottom line.
Okay. Thank you. Thanks, Isaac. Crystal, next question please.
Our next question comes from the line of Matt Taylor with Barclays.
Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. So I wanted to follow-up on 2 points and really just put a finer point on 2 areas that you've already touched on. One is, it's encouraging to see the diabetes turnaround and you talked about getting to a point where you're now meeting demand. I guess, could you help us sequentially understand from here how much improvement you could see in terms of your ability to grow beyond that and actually go after more new customers?
And maybe just touch on in a little bit more detail the Animas change and how that could help your pump business as a preferred provider?
Sure, Matt. When we say by the end of this quarter, we'll be able to meet unconstrained demand. That's not only talking about pump users and our ability to satisfy the sensor needs of the patients who are on pumps. It's also about our ability to go after new markets like standalone sensors, which I had talked about with Guardian Sensor 3 and the pending approval in the United States. So we really feel confident that by the end of this year, we'll be in a position to really go after our existing markets as well as start to really penetrate aggressively new markets that we currently don't play in.
That's number 1. As far as Animas goes, I'd say that's progressing very well. We are generating today consumable revenue from that transaction and we're transitioning patients that are out of warranty from Animas to Medtronic as planned. And things are going very well with that. And we're getting some incremental growth out of that.
And the way I would characterize it is, we even if you exclude Animas, we would have been double digits in Q3. But we're very pleased with how that's going and we look forward to just continuing the transition.
Great. And then just a follow-up maybe for Mike Coyle or anybody else wants to jump in on CVG. So really encouraged by the growth this quarter and the mid single digit expectations going forward. Could you just touch on specifically whether you're seeing competition from the recent MRI labels of your key competitors and how you're able to offset that? You talked about TYRX, but any kind of further color in that one pain point would help.
Yes, Matt. Obviously, we play in a lot of segments and we see various momentum coming from our new product launches and competitive new product launches. And we are seeing at the margin some share loss in the initial implants in the ICD segment, just as MRI has come in for the both competitors and they're basically going to their user friendly accounts and getting some of that share back. Of course, on the flip side, we are taking share in the Brady segment of the market because of not only Micra, but also because of our CRTP Quadripolar product as well as the strong position we have now with our next generation wireless pacing technology that just entered the U. S.
Market. And obviously, you also saw we're taking market share in both the coronary and in tambor segments. So basically when you net it all together, we are really just taking advantage of the size and scale that we have as an organization for diversified growth. And we think we can continue to deliver above the market growth. And in our segment, market growth is between 4.5% and 5% typically.
So that 4 point 5% to 5.5% we're talking about next quarter really is just a function of a very strong Q4 a year ago. And we expect to be able to continue to participate across our broad portfolios at that above market growth.
Great. Thanks, Mike.
Thanks, Matt. We'll take the next question please, Crystal.
Our next question comes from the line of Danielle Analafi with Meering Partners.
Thanks so much. Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on a really strong quarter. Omar, I was wondering if you could talk about new growth I'm sorry, new product contribution to growth in the quarter. Obviously, new products are a key part of this.
And also, how we should think about the contribution of the new product growth vector in fiscal 2019? Not asking you to give guidance, but it just seems like that's going to become an increasingly important part of the growth story.
Yes. I think first of all, I don't have the exact number in front of me, but that is the major component of the growth in this last quarter and it will be going forward. And the company is really based around therapy innovations, so that's not surprising. I do want to point out clearly that our value based healthcare programs, our economic value programs are all accelerators for our new products. And we realized that the connection of our technology to demonstrating clear outcome improvements is the way to get value for these products even in the current fee for service environment and to get differentiated pricing for these because of the credible promise and commitment to improve the outcome, which our customers see.
So you'll see an increasing sort of drive towards newer and newer therapies, but the linkage to the outcome and the value that that creates is what will give us our differentiated strategy. And then over time, of course, these products then go into emerging markets and drive further acceptance in those markets and penetration. But the new products in our business are the fundamental sort of value that we have and the linkage to outcomes is what the value is to our customers. And our ability to join these 2 together as we're successfully able to do now, it will differentiate us and will give us momentum.
Great. And just one quick follow-up to that. Given the importance of new products, can you talk about the gross margin profile of these new products sort of overall? Is it in line with or above corporate average? Is that the right way to think of new products generally?
I think the new products, yes, in general. I mean, sometimes they're so attractive and the market wants them, we make a trade off with price and volume. But in general, with the new feature, there's new value and the price is justified by the value that the customers in an objective way realize. And so this is not an arbitrary thing. If there's value, we get the price.
And in general, you'll see that. And you'll see it offset order And our ability to maintain them is dependent on these new products. Thank you. And our ability to maintain them is dependent on these new products.
Thank you so much.
Thank you, Danielle. Next question please, Crystal.
Our next question comes from the line of Joanne Wuensch with BMO.
Thank you
for taking the question. Very nice revenue growth this quarter. Could we talk a little bit about what you're seeing in the TAVR market? Your verbiage indicated you're opening up new centers. And is there anything specific that we should look for at ACC?
Mike, go ahead.
Yes. I think the market dynamics have remained very strong there in terms of overall market growth in the low 20s on a constant currency basis and that's pretty well balanced across the U. S. And international. We obviously have been in a share capture mode here over the last couple of quarters based on really the performance of the Evolut Pro product, which is being extremely well received in terms of its lowering per evaluable leak rates, lowering pacemaker rates.
And so it's really being received as an excellent product. But also obviously the expanded indications for use into intermediate risk and of course we continue with enrollment in the low risk patient population. And of course we've entered Japan obviously with the Evolut product as well. So all of those collectively are helping us drive above market growth in the overall market. There's nothing particularly new at ACC coming in terms of really it's just additional data in some of our larger registries and studies, which obviously continue to support the performance of the products and especially EVOLUPRO.
So you'll see those at ACC.
Thank you. And as a follow-up question, your Resolute On X is gaining a fair amount of momentum this quarter. Is there anything qualitatively you can share with us as that product being rolled out? Thank you.
Yes. Well, we think that is our customers tell us it's probably the best handling stent in the marketplace in terms of high visibility or good visibility. It's got great deliverability. We also expanded the size matrix and have actually some unique sizes that other companies don't have. And the other thing it does for us is in conjunction with Resolute Integrity, which is also a very well performing product, gives us a little more balance in terms of how we can provide multiple price points into the market to deal with the pricing pressures.
And so collectively, those things have really allowed us to both stabilize pricing and to drive market share capture across that segment. And of course, it's still a very large product segment and highly profitable. So we're glad to see the growth that we're getting out of the product in both the U. S. And in Japan.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Joanne. Crystal, next question please.
Next question comes from the line of Glenn Novarro with RBC Capital Markets.
Hi, good morning. Two questions on spine. First, it looks like the spine market had another challenging quarter. Do you guys have any incremental insights? Anything you may have regarding the challenges that are facing the market, anything new you may have picked up in the last 3 months?
And then as a follow-up sticking with spine, I'm wondering how much has the Maser robot helped drive your business? And has it helped pull through any incremental hardware and biologic sales? Thank you.
Go ahead, Jeff. Yes.
Glenn, on the market, no new insights from last quarter. I mean, the formula that we had been seeing in, I'll call it FY 2017 and even Q1 of FY 2018 is more of a kind of 5% procedural growth with maybe 3% price reductions for a net 2% growth on a global basis. And that formula has come down to maybe a 2% or 3% procedure growth with a 2% or 3% price decline to get you basically flat. And that's what we've been seeing over the last couple of quarters. We do think that's going to go up from here to another a point of net growth or so over the next couple of quarters is what we're seeing.
But no new insights in terms of what's driving that. I mean, there is definitely a more pricing I think there is another point of pricing pressure in here. And then with hospitals consolidating, getting more sophisticated in their buying patterns and their tendering and they are consolidating their vendor base. And for us, it's a tale of 2 cities. 1, given our product breadth in implants plus our enabling technologies, we end up usually a net benefactor when you consolidate vendors, but it is resulting in some price declines.
So that's why we're gaining net net gaining some share. In terms of Mazor, it is starting I mean the distribution relationship is relatively new and it is starting to pull through revenue. There's 2 tangible we haven't seen the benefit of it yet. We'll see it in the coming quarters. There's 2 tangible ways to pull us through revenue.
1 is when we place a piece of equipment at an account in return for incremental spine share. So in the last two quarters, we've started doing that with Mazor and that lags maybe 6 months before those contracts take effect and we actually see that incremental revenue. So we haven't seen it yet, but it's locked in, if you will. And then going forward, around the December or January timeframe, we'll be launching an integrated we'll have Mazor integrated into our broader spine enabling technology. So it's fully integrated with navigation and interopters imaging or O arm.
And in that case, the advanced features of that platform will only be will only work with Medtronic Implant. So it will be a technology tie in with the platform that will further pull through. So it is starting to drive the revenue. You don't see it in our economics yet, but it will be coming in the coming quarters. And those are the two reasons why.
Hey, Jeff, just one clarification. Did you say going forward, you thought procedure volume would improve, offset by maybe slightly greater pricing pressure. So net net, no change in the market going forward on
the It's hard to predict this, but we're looking at net net anywhere from no change to maybe 100 basis points improvement on net.
Okay. Okay, great. Thanks, Jeff.
Thanks, Glenn. We'll take one more question please, Crystal.
Our next question our final question comes from the line of Josh Jennings with Cowen.
Good morning. Thank you. I was hoping to follow-up, Omar, on your comments on your economic value creation strategy. Historically, you've talked about 40 to 60 basis points of organic growth contribution coming from the Services and Solutions business. I was wondering if you could update your thoughts there.
Should we still be considering the annuity revenue growth from Hospital Solutions, some of your pure services business like Cardiacom well as the value based programs driving 40 to 60 basis points of organic growth? Or should we be thinking more about the implant benefit with some of those programs driving growth on more on the implant side going forward? And I have one follow-up.
Sure. Look, I think both. We haven't been able to hit the 40 to 60 basis points. I know we talked about it as a target, but we're closer to the 20 to 40, I'd say. And our growth in Hospital Solutions continues and we had actually a particularly strong quarter with the VA in our Care Management Services business.
So I mean those that annuity revenue actually continues to grow. We are increasing the number of hospitals. We're pretty excited about the spread of contracts that we're getting in hospitals around the world now in Latin America and in the Middle East as well as in Western Europe through our hospital solutions and that's increased from our cath lab managed services to our operating managed services as well. So there's a strong focus in the company around that and that will deliver increased annuity revenue. I think though what we found is that the bigger benefit and that's a value, but the bigger benefit actually is the linkage with our new therapies, which is then driving incremental share in our new therapies and incremental pricing in some situation where the innovation and value are directly linked.
And so that's why we started to look at this in a much more integrated fashion. And the contribution of economic value actually to our innovation program is greater than the annuity revenue, although I'm not by any means saying we're going away from that in any way.
Thanks for that. And just a follow-up, one of the drivers behind the responsive acquisition for hip and knee offering was the services business and the opportunity there. Any chance you can give us an update just on the performance of your hip and knee offering relative to internal expectations and any updated thoughts on the Medtronic's drive to add breadth and scale to the orthopedic unit? Thanks a lot.
I think we're still in the early phases of that. And I'm going to ask Jeff to kind of comment on it. So go ahead, Jeff.
Yes. Sure. As Omar said, I mean, look, we're coming into the ortho market, we want to come in, in a disruptive way, both from a device standpoint and from a services standpoint. And so we are we remain really encouraged about the opportunity, but it is taking a little longer than we thought. We're still working on this and we are getting good engagement from customers both on the device side.
Our knee is out there and is being operated on in a number of centers and we've had, I don't know, a number 50 or so patients that it's been implanted in. But again, we're continuing to tweak the instrument design on that to get it exactly where we want it. And the hip is from an FDA approval standpoint several quarters out. So we're continuing to work on that and being encouraged by the demand for the value proposition on the device side. And on the services side, this is more of a care pathway offering.
Also very encouraged by the customers we've engaged with several hospitals and also some outpatient surgery centers. Again, not ready to fully ramp this, because that takes an investment of capital that until we get the exact formula right to be disruptive and scale this in a profitable way, we're not going to aggressively ramp it. So we are still working on this and we'll update you in the future on this.
Thank you.
Thanks, Josh. Okay. Thanks to all for your questions. And on behalf of the entire management team, I'd like to thank you again for your continued support and interest in Medtronic. And we look forward to updating you on our progress and results for our full year on our Q4 call, which we currently anticipate holding on Thursday, May 24.
Thank you all very much.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now