As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jake Elguicze, Treasurer and Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Teleflex Incorporated fourth quarter 2018 earnings conference call. The press release and slides to accompany this call are available on our website at www.teleflex.com. As a reminder, this call will be available on our website, and a replay will be available by dialing 855-859-2056, or for international calls, 404-537-3406, passcode 3059948. Participating on today's call are Liam Kelly, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas Powell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Liam and Tom will provide prepared remarks, then we'll open up the call to Q&A.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that some of the matters discussed in the conference call will contain forward-looking statements regarding future events as outlined in our slides. We wish to caution you that such statements are in fact forward-looking in nature and are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially. The factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially include, but are not limited to, factors referenced in our press release today, as well as our filings with the SEC, including our Form 10-K, which can be accessed on our website. With that said, I'd like to turn the call over to Liam.
Thank you, Jake, good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to speak with you again. Let me start by saying how pleased we are with our fourth quarter results and the strong finish we saw to the year. We executed well across many of our business units, particularly in the second half of 2018. This was led by performance within our Interventional Urology North America, Interventional Access North America, Asia, and OEM businesses. As expected, we gained momentum as we moved throughout the year, delivering accelerated organic revenue growth in the second half of the year as compared to the first half, resulting in full-year organic constant currency revenue growth of 5.1%. This top-line achievement, coupled with continued execution on various restructuring initiatives, drove approximately 18% adjusted earnings per share growth during 2018.
We also achieved several important clinical and regulatory milestones that should position us well for the next several years. Some of those milestones include publishing new clinical and real-world data on UroLift, receiving UroLift Shonin approval in Japan, obtaining the 510(k) for Percuvance, and on February 1st, receiving the PMA for MANTA, our recently acquired large bore vascular closure product. With that as a summary, let me provide you with an overview of our fourth quarter results. During quarter four, revenue grew 7.8% on a reported basis and 9.4% on a constant currency basis. With only a small contribution from M&A, fourth quarter organic constant currency revenue growth was 9.1%, driven by NeoTract becoming organic in quarter four, combined with strong growth from legacy product families. Turning to NeoTract, or as we call it, Interventional Urology, the business had an outstanding fourth quarter and full year.
Fourth quarter revenues were $57.8 million, up nearly 48% compared to the prior year period. Full-year revenues were $196.7 million, up nearly 57% year-over-year, as physicians continued to rapidly adopt UroLift into their practices. The theme of relevant clinical data publications continued in quarter four with the published 12-month data from the use of UroLift in men with an obstructive median lobe, showing outcomes consistent with our five-year lift study. While we also conducted a separate survey which demonstrated a very low level of awareness among men of minimally invasive treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Turning to Vascular Solutions, global fourth quarter revenues reached $56.4 million, which represented growth of over 27% compared to the prior year period.
Vascular Solutions worldwide revenue growth was once again robust in both North America and EMEA, which continues to benefit from the distributor conversions we initiated in the second half of 2017. For the full year, VSI revenues globally were $209.9 million, up about 18% year-over-year. Turning to some other key metrics. During the quarter, our adjusted gross and operating margins reached 57.6% and 26.5%, respectively, both expanding 110 basis points over the prior year period. This translated into adjusted earnings per share of $2.77 for the quarter, which is an increase of 13.5% over fourth quarter 2017. While from a full-year perspective, our adjusted earnings per share was $9.90, up approximately 18% from 2017, and near the top end of our previously increased guidance range. With that as an overview, let's now look at quarter four revenue in more detail.
Fourth quarter 2018 revenue totaled $641.6 million, which is an increase of 9.4% on a constant currency basis. Beginning with the components of organic revenue growth. During quarter four, we saw organic constant currency revenue growth of 9.1%. Our 9.1% organic growth consisted of 5.4% from product volume, excluding the impact of the surgical product line exit and the shipping day impact, and 1.7% from new product introductions. We had one additional shipping day in the fourth quarter, which added 1.4%, and positive pricing, which added about 80 basis points. These positive contributors were partly offset by the surgical product line exit, which negatively impacted quarter four growth by about 20 basis points. This should be the last period in which we have any meaningful impact from the surgical product line divestiture.
In addition to growing our revenues organically 9.1%, we also had a contribution from M&A of about 30 basis points, thereby making our total constant currency revenue growth in quarter four 2018, 9.4%. Turning next to our revenue performance by segment. Vascular North America fourth quarter revenue increased 6.3% on a constant currency basis to $85.7 million, driven by strong growth in PICCs, VasoNova navigation products, and EZ-IO. Moving to Interventional North America. Fourth quarter revenue was $69.7 million, which is an increase of approximately 13.3% on a constant currency basis. The increase here is primarily the result of higher sales of Vascular Solutions products, as well as growth in OnControl. Turning to Anesthesia North America. Fourth quarter revenue was $50.8 million, which is an increase of 2.1% on a constant currency basis. Growth in this segment was driven by our airway and EZ-IO products.
Shifting to our Surgical North America business. Revenue decreased 3% on a constant currency basis to $42.4 million. Surgical revenues were impacted by our decision to exit a low-margin surgical product in 2017, which caused a headwind of about $1 million in quarter four. Moving to our overseas operations. Fourth quarter EMEA revenues were up 8.2% on a constant currency basis to $150.9 million. Growth in EMEA was largely driven by distributor conversions as well as increased sales of vascular access products. Now to Asia. Fourth quarter revenue increased 5.5% on a constant currency basis to $79.8 million. From a product standpoint, growth in this region was driven by interventional access and surgical products. But from a country perspective, revenue growth was strong within Southeast Asia, Japan, and China, whose revenues expanded approximately 5.2% despite the most difficult comparison of the year.
Next, I'd like to brief you on our OEM segment. During the fourth quarter, revenue was up approximately 15.4% on a constant currency basis and reached $52.7 million. The increase in OEM revenues was due to continued strong sales volumes of catheter and performance fiber products. And lastly, fourth quarter revenue for the business within our all other category was up 21.4% on a constant currency basis, totaling $109.6 million. Growth here is primarily attributable to UroLift. That completes my comments on quarter four revenue performance. Turning to a brief update on UroLift. The fourth quarter closed out a spectacular year for UroLift. Not only did revenue grow by nearly 57%, but the Interventional Urology business unit achieved important milestones in the clinical, reimbursement, and regulatory categories. Let me highlight a few of the more recent milestone achievements.
In November, we were very pleased to announce UroLift received Shonin approval in Japan. Given that this approval came a bit earlier than expected, we have decided to accelerate some pre-commercial investments to work with key opinion leading urologists ahead of obtaining reimbursement and our expected limited launch in mid-2020. As a reminder, our plan to build a market for UroLift in Japan will follow a methodical process, like how we are building the U.S. market. We continue to believe that obtaining reimbursement will be a 12 to 18-month process. Once reimbursement is established, we will begin commercialization with academic centers to build strong initial clinical experience, followed by a full commercial launch. In parallel with commercialization, we will begin enrolling a PMDA-mandated post-market clinical study using many of our initial implanting physicians.
In December, 12-month results from a study of UroLift for BPH in men with an obstructive median lobe were published in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease, showing significant improvement in BPH symptoms and quality of life consistent with the five-year lift study. This provides an additional tool for the commercial team as they complete their physician training on the median lobe technique. Seeing clinical outcomes improve as a product moves from the clinical to the real world is a rare achievement in medical devices, and we are thrilled to have accomplished this with UroLift over the past few years. We also recently commissioned a survey to better understand patient awareness of BPH and its available treatment options.
The survey demonstrated that only 6% of patients surveyed in the U.S. were aware that minimally invasive treatment for BPH were available. Additionally, over 90% said that they were either very likely or somewhat likely to seek minimally invasive procedures if they carried less risk of impotence or incontinence. Clearly, we have only scratched the surface of penetrating this very large market. as the only BPH therapy that has shown zero incidence of new onset sexual dysfunction, UroLift is clearly positioned for continued leadership in the minimally invasive treatment of BPH. More recently, we announced a reimbursement milestone of receiving a positive coverage decision from Humana, adding approximately 9 million covered lives, bringing UroLift total covered lives to over 270 million in the United States.
Lastly, we are thrilled to announce that to date, UroLift has helped over 100,000 men treat their enlarged prostate with a highly efficacious solution that has completely revolutionized the patient experience in treating the symptoms of BPH. We think it's obvious, UroLift is in an exceptionally strong position and expect full year 2019 Interventional Urology revenues to grow by approximately 30% year-over-year as more physicians adopt UroLift deeper into their practice. Longer term, we continue to have high confidence in our multi-year financial objectives for the business and believe that UroLift will become the standard of care for the treatment of BPH. Turning to MANTA. We were pleased to announce on February 1st, 2019, that MANTA received pre-market approval from the FDA. This was ahead of our anticipated second quarter 2019 approval, assuming no FDA panel review.
With this approval, MANTA is now the first commercially available biomechanical vascular closure device designed specifically for large bore femoral arterial access site closure. We continue to believe the global market for MANTA to be approximately $200 million-$300 million. Our U.S. commercial efforts in 2019 will include a limited market release in the second quarter to ensure strong initial outcomes with key thought leading physicians as we invest in further building the commercial infrastructure to support the long-term growth of this product. Excuse me. As such, we do not expect a significant amount of MANTA revenues in the U.S. in the 2019 timeframe. Let me now take a moment to articulate our primary strategic initiatives for 2019. At the top of the list is riding the continued penetration of UroLift.
The Interventional Urology business unit is starting 2019 with strong momentum and several tailwinds that we think will result in another year of significant revenue growth. The sales organization is motivated. More physicians are adopting UroLift deep into their practice. The body of strong clinical evidence continues to grow, and reimbursement is well established. We don't plan to change the playbook significantly in 2019. We simply plan to continue executing our proven go deep commercial strategy as we methodically expand the commercial organization and leverage UroLift's broad coverage in the U.S. The next initiative is to invest in our growth businesses. We have proactively decided to either accelerate or expand key investments in 2019 that we believe will support accelerated organic constant currency revenue growth that is sustainable over a multi-year period.
While this will create some headwinds to operating margin expansion in the near term, we think it is the right long-term strategic decision for our company. As such, given the earlier than expected approval for UroLift in Japan, we are accelerating pre-commercial investments in that country. These investments will be focused on key opinion leading urologists to address what we believe is a $2 billion market. We are also expanding our direct-to-consumer and digital marketing initiatives in 2019, following a positive pilot in 2018. Following the acquisition of Essential Medical, we are further building the commercial infrastructure to support MANTA, with a focus on accelerating its revenue growth in 2020 and 2021. EZ-IO continues to be a growth driver, and we are putting additional resources behind that product.
Lastly, we expect our Asia business to continue to drive meaningful growth through 2021, and we plan to support that region with additional sales and clinical resources. Moving to the advancement of some key pipeline products. We continue to be focused on completing the BLA submission for RePlas, which we anticipate occurring in the third quarter of 2019. Following the submission, our focus will shift to tasks that we will need to complete following RePlas approval. First, we need to begin enrollment in a confirmatory post-approval efficacy study that is mandated by the FDA. Second, we will be focused on building capacity for RePlas to support this efficacy study and some initial commercial sales. We remain very enthusiastic about this product and its longer-term outlook. Turning to UroLift 2.
Once the sales force has trained our physician base on the median lobe technique, we will begin the rollout of UroLift 2, which we continue to expect in the latter half of 2019, with a full conversion of the U.S. physician base from UL1 to UL2 in 2021. Our focus for Percuvance in 2019 is to methodically reintroduce the product to key thought leading positions in the U.S. and assess initial market demand. Like RePlas, we are assuming an immaterial amount of Percuvance revenue in our 2019 guidance, with no change to our longer-term revenue assumptions for this product line. Lastly, non-revenue dependent margin expansion continues to be a key strategic priority for Teleflex. Our focus in 2019 will be to deliver cost savings of previously announced programs while initiating work on our new 2019 restructuring program announced in conjunction with today's earnings press release.
This program involves the relocation of certain manufacturing operations from higher cost locations to existing Teleflex facilities in lower cost geographies and related workforce reductions. In total, we expect to achieve annual pre-tax savings of between $12 million and $14 million once fully completed, and we should begin to realize some initial savings beginning in 2021. Overall, our restructuring initiatives remain on track, further supporting our confidence in our ability to achieve our previously provided long-term adjusted growth and operating margin targets. When you take a step back and look at 2019 in the context of these strategic initiatives, we believe we can deliver between 6% and 7% constant currency revenue growth and deliver double-digit earnings growth, all while overcoming foreign exchange tariffs and tax headwinds, and make significant investments to position our business for sustainable long-term growth.
One last headwind we are overcoming in 2019 is our first quarter divestiture of our vein reprocessing business, which came to us through the acquisition of VSI. Vein reprocessing was a non-strategic business for Teleflex and was not a fit with our long-term vision. While non-strategic, this business contributed $0.06 to our adjusted earnings in 2018. Finally, before turning the call over to Tom, I would like to draw your attention to what we believe is an improvement to our segment reporting structure, which we have implemented in the first quarter of 2019. On this slide, you see our segments as they are reported in today's earnings release on the left, while on the right is our new segment reporting structure, the Americas, EMEA, Asia, OEM, and other.
In addition to these segment changes, beginning with the first quarter of 2019, as part of our quarterly earnings conference call and messaging, we will provide information concerning our global product family revenues, including global vascular access, interventional access, anesthesia, surgical, Interventional Urology, OEM, and other, with the other category capturing our respiratory and urology product lines. We believe this reporting structure is an improvement and will provide investors with greater visibility into the global performance of our product families. In conjunction with the filing of our 10-K, we will also be posting new supplemental financial information on the investor section of our website, which provides a quarterly historical breakdown of our newly defined segment and global product family revenues. That completes my prepared remarks.
At this time, I would like to thank Teleflex employees and investors for the tremendous amount of support you have provided during my first year as CEO. I will turn the call over to Tom for a detailed review of our fourth quarter and full year 2018 financials and to provide our 2019 guidance. Tom?
Thanks, Liam. Good morning, everyone. Given the previous discussion of the company's revenue performance, I'll begin at the gross profit line. For the quarter, adjusted gross profit was $369.3 million, versus $336.3 million in the prior year quarter, or an increase of approximately 10%. Adjusted gross margin increased 110 basis points versus the prior year period to 57.6%. The expansion in adjusted gross margin primarily reflects efficiencies related to higher UroLift in Interventional Access sales volumes, favorable pricing, and a positive impact from foreign exchange. Turning to operating profit. For the quarter, adjusted operating profit was $169.9 million, versus $151.2 million in the prior year quarter, or an increase of approximately 12%. Adjusted operating margin in the fourth quarter of 2018 was 26.5%, which is an increase of 110 basis points over the prior year period.
Adjusted net interest expense decreased to $23.1 million from $23.5 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease reflects the impact of our recently completed cross-currency swap transaction, which provided an interest benefit of approximately $3.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. This was offset by higher interest rates on our floating rate debt. For the quarter, our adjusted tax rate was 11.7% versus 10.9% in the prior year period. On the bottom line, adjusted earnings per share increased 13.5% to $2.77. Turning now to our balance sheet and cash flow highlights. For the full year 2018, cash flow from operations totaled $435 million, up approximately 2% over the prior year.
The increases attributable to favorable operating results, partially offset by higher income tax payments in 2018 as compared to 2017, and a net unfavorable impact from changes in working capital. Finally, our debt outstanding at year-end was largely unchanged from that of the third quarter. Our leverage level, as defined under our credit facility, stood at approximately 3.2 times. Overall, 2018 was a solid year for Teleflex. On a full-year basis, organic revenue grew by 5.1% and constant currency grew by 12.7%. Gross margin and operating margin each expanded by 110 basis points, and adjusted EPS increased by 17.9%. This completes my comments on 2018. Now I'll move to 2019 guidance. In 2019, we project constant currency revenue growth of between 6% and 7%, with Interventional Urology, Interventional Access, and Asia being key contributors to growth.
Our expectation is that the revenue decrease caused by the recently completed divestiture of the vein reprocessing product line will be offset by recent acquisitions, including MANTA. During 2019, we expect a 1% headwind from foreign exchange, with the greatest impact being in the first and second quarters. As a result, we expect our as-reported revenue to increase between 5% and 6% during 2019. This would equate to a dollar range of between $2,571,000,000-$2,595,000,000. Turning next to gross margin. During 2019, we anticipate that adjusted gross margin will increase between 90 and 140 basis points to a range of 58%-58.5%. We expect gross margin expansion to be driven by Interventional Urology, Interventional Access, and other favorable product mix. Additionally, we expect continued benefits from manufacturing productivity improvement programs and from previously announced footprint restructuring programs.
Somewhat offsetting the gross margin expansion are anticipated headwinds from incremental tariffs, inflation, and foreign exchange. Moving to adjusted operating margin. During 2019, we anticipate that adjusted operating margin will increase between 80 and 130 basis points to a range of 26.5%-27%. This range includes proactive investments in support of the U.S. launch of MANTA, pre-commercial UroLift market development in Japan, and expansion of UroLift direct-to-consumer campaigns in the U.S. That takes me to our adjusted earnings per share outlook for 2019. This slide serves as a bridge from our full-year 2018 adjusted EPS result to our full-year 2019 adjusted EPS outlook. Beginning with 2018 adjusted earnings per share of $9.90. From an operating standpoint, in 2019, we project our core operations to add approximately $1.66 to $1.71 per share, or an increase of approximately 17%.
We expect to generate this significant level of operating leverage through accelerated revenue growth, favorable mix, and manufacturing cost reduction initiatives. In 2019, we expect interest expense to range between $87 million and $90 million. The year-over-year reduction of $12 million-$15 million will contribute to an estimated $0.25-$0.30 of earnings accretion. The year-over-year reduction in interest expense is largely the result of the cross-currency swap completed in October 2018 and our planning assumption that free cash flow will be used to further reduce debt outstanding. The projection also assumes two U.S. interest rate hikes during 2019. Lastly, should capital markets remain receptive, we will look for opportunities to further optimize the capital structure. Moving to taxes.
During 2019, we project that our adjusted tax rate will be in a range of 14%-14.8% and will result in adjusted earnings per share headwind of approximately $0.30-$0.40. The expected year-over-year increase in the adjusted tax rate is a result of a higher mix of U.S. taxable income in the 2019 operating plan. Additionally, our assumption is that the 2019 windfall benefit from stock-based compensation is at a normalized level versus the typically high level we realized in 2018. Foreign exchange is expected to be a headwind of approximately $0.20, while increased tariffs are expected to be a headwind of approximately $0.15. We estimate that weighted average shares will increase to 47.2 million for full year 2019, which is diluted by approximately $0.10 per share.
Finally, the divestiture of the vein reprocessing business will remove approximately $0.06 of our adjusted EPS base. Despite a number of headwinds, our outlook for 2019 adjusted earnings per share remains robust at $10.90-$11.10 and represents growth of between 10.1%-12.1% versus 2018, or a growth rate double that of our expected as-reported revenue growth. While it is not our practice to provide specific quarterly financial guidance, it has been our practice at the outset of each year to highlight some considerations regarding variability between our quarterly expectations. As for the number of shipping days, 2019 has the same number of total days as to 2018. There is one less day in the second quarter and one more day in the fourth quarter.
For the first quarter of 2019, we expect to realize approximately 23.5% of full-year as-reported revenue. We further expect to realize approximately 19.5% of our full-year adjusted earnings per share. These estimates reflect our expectation that the adverse impact from foreign currency will be the greatest during the first quarter. That concludes my prepared remarks. I would now like to return the call back to Liam for closing commentary.
Thank you, Tom. In closing, we are excited for what 2019 holds for Teleflex. We expect as-reported revenue growth of between 5%-6%, and constant currency revenue growth of between 6%-7%. Despite foreign exchange, tariff, and tax headwinds, as well as the decision to accelerate certain investments to support sustained organic revenue growth over the long term, we expect another year of strong adjusted earnings growth that is double the rate of our forecasted as-reported revenue growth. Looking over the 2019-2021 timeframe, our previously provided financial projections of average organic constant currency revenue growth of between 6%-7%, adjusted gross margin of between 60%-61%, and adjusted operating margin of between 30%-31% remain very much on track. That concludes my prepared remarks. Now I'd like to turn the call back to the operator for some Q&A.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to ask a question at this time, please press star one on your touchtone telephone. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press the pound key. To prevent any background noise, we ask that you please place your line on mute once your question has been stated. Our first question comes from David Lewis with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Good morning. Liam, I wanted to start with guidance and then maybe a follow-up on NeoTract. I'm sort of thinking about the 6%-7% constant currency for 2019. When I consider the impact of NeoTract, Vidacare, VSI, and your commentary around limited expectations for MANTA, Percuvance, RePlas, I guess the question I want to ask is, I think about the 6%-7%, is the 6% or low end of that guidance range realistic? What gets you to that low end of the range given sort of your commentary this morning? I had a quick follow-up.
Yeah. David, obviously, we are very happy with the progress that we made in 2019. We are a little bit like the New England Patriots. We had a much stronger second half than first half, in our Teleflex year and in our Super Bowl, if I can put it that way. We have a lot of momentum as we get into 2019. In 2019, we estimate that our organic constant currency revenue growth will accelerate from the 5.1% in 2018 to the 6%-7% in 2019. I will point to a few of the growth drivers that we see that will get that acceleration. NeoTract will add approximately 30%. Interventional Urology will deliver high single digits, APAC delivering mid to upper single-digit growth. Those are the three main drivers. We also, as well as that, we expect continued growth in Vidacare.
We expect our PICCs to continue to grow, OEM to continue, and obviously a rebound in our surgical business and also in Latin America. We feel very comfortable with our range of the 6%-7%, and bridging from 5.1% to the 6%, we also feel pretty confident in that lower end, David.
Okay. Is it fair to say, Liam, that the contribution of incremental products, MANTA, Percuvance, RePlas, it can push you to the upper end of that range? My follow-up, I will just ask as well. As I think about NeoTract, I wonder if Tom could give us a sense of where NeoTract gross margins sit prior to Neo2, and then your 30% growth outlook for 2019. What assumptions were made there to reflect emerging competition? Thanks so much. I will jump back in queue.
Okay. Obviously, it is a competitive world across many of our businesses, David, and the main competition for the UroLift product is the Rezūm product. I will say that we are very much down the track of making Rezūm, or making UroLift the standard of care for the treatment of BPH. We believe that the clinical evidence that we have and the continued clinical evidence that continues to support the product makes it a very easy choice for the urologist to pick our product, the UroLift, every day. We continue to invest behind the sales organization. For an example, just in sales investments, excluding all the other aspects that we spoke about, we are actually investing about $10 million in additional sales resources behind the UroLift product. Our original plan for sales heads at this point in our original model was to be at about 85 sales heads.
We're crossing over the 100 mark as we continue to invest heavily behind it, that's why we remain confident even in the competitive world. There is also the rising tide lifts all boats. When we have another company talking about BPH, we actually see that as being a potential good thing as more urologists become aware. As you heard in my prepared remarks, a lot of men are not aware that there is a minimally invasive treatment out there that has minimal sexual dysfunction or zero sexual dysfunction. Therefore, by educating urologists, by having another company talking and educating urologists, that will ultimately end up in men being educated. We've still only scratched the surface of penetration with the UroLift product. Tom, do you want to cover the margin question that David asked?
Yeah, certainly. David, as we've seen volumes grow with NeoTract, we've also seen the ability to expand the gross margin even before we go to UL2. In 2018, we finished the year I would say in the mid 70% gross margins. For 2019, we expect to tick up a little bit further towards the upper mid, if you will, the upper mid-range of the 70s.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Richard Newitter with SVB Leerink. Your line is open.
Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Just wanted to start off with the guidance, the 6%-7%. I appreciate a lot of your growth drivers are now organic, but just tracking that underlying base business, I think is important because that's where we saw most of the fluctuations last year. Is it right to think of kind of the ex NeoTract and VSI business as still a 4% growth business as you contemplate that 6%-7% growth outlook?
Yeah. Thanks, Rich. As we look at it's all organic for Teleflex as we move into 2019. The way we look at it, we're moving from a 5.1% growth to a 6%-7% growth. It gets more and more difficult to break out VSI as it becomes embedded within Teleflex. VSI had an excellent year. We would point people to look at the interventional access business unit that we will now be breaking out globally. We would expect that business unit to be in the high single digits for the year 2019. As I said earlier, the other drivers of our growth that we expect is obviously NeoTract that we've spoken about, but also APAC, which we would expect to be in the mid to upper single-digit growth.
As I said already, there are some other key products and regions such as Vidacare, PICCs, OEM, Surgical and Latin America that we would expect to see improvements from. All in all, we feel very comfortable in our 6%-7% organic constant currency revenue growth. I think if we just take a step back, as a company, we couldn't be happier to think that even at the lower end, on an as-reported revenue growth of 5%, we're getting double that in EPS, giving you 10% EPS growth, which is a pretty unique med tech asset in our minds.
Okay. Fair enough. Then, Liam, in the past, you've talked directionally to what the tracings indicator has been for the current and future quarter from your distributors. I guess, one, what percentage of your business is exposed even to maybe some of the factors that created lumpiness from the erratic distributor ordering patterns last year? Has that been a lesson this year to potentially limit the lumpiness? And then two, what can you tell us, if it's still relevant, about that tracings data in the current period? Thanks.
Starting with how much of our business is exposed, Rich, in the past, about half of our North American business went through these distributors, the Cardinal, the Owens & Minor, the Medline, those distributors. Moving forward, now that NeoTract and VSI become organic and don't normally go through that channel, about one-third of our business should go through those distributors. Regarding the tracings, our tracings were very consistent with the improved tracings that we saw in Q2 and Q3 of 2018. We continue to see good, strong end customer demand for our products, which also makes us feel very confident about our 6%-7% for 2019.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Lawrence Keusch with Raymond James. Your line is open.
Good morning, everyone. Liam, I want to start with just one bigger picture question, which is around the strength of your balance sheet, as Tom indicated, 3.2 times levered. Certainly gives you, on our math, at least $1 billion of firepower for M&A. The question is, I think most recently you've been sort of talking about, again, a focus on deleveraging, but also potentially able to do some tuck-in M&A. I felt like the door was open a little bit more to a larger deal, just wanted to take your temperature on how you're thinking about M&A activity and potential size.
You're absolutely correct, Larry. We're down in the low threes at the end of the year. Assuming we don't do an M&A, we will continue to improve our leverage during 2019. The way I look at it, Larry, is that in 2019, we have the capacity to do a scaled transaction if we can find it. The next follow-up question normally, Larry, is what's the environment like? The environment is pretty rich at the moment. We had a full M&A team at a big medtech conference recently that was held in San Francisco. We met with well over 60 companies at that. We do realize, Larry, that we only get credit for the good transactions. Having the capacity does not mean we're actually going to do a transaction in 2019.
We continue to be very active in the M&A world, and we continue to look at assets on an ongoing basis. Even in 2018, we didn't do any scaled transaction, but we still put nearly $100 million of capital to work between MANTA, Codirex, and other smaller tuck-in transactions. Down to your question directly, Larry, yes, we have the capacity to do a scaled transaction if we can find it in 2019.
Perfect. Just two quick ones. Looks like, at least relative to my notes, that the timing of RePlas, in terms of the BLA submission, may have slipped a bit. It looks like now it's Q3. I had been under the impression it was more like end of Q1, early Q2. Any thoughts around that? Secondly, maybe for Tom, as again we think about the Q1, just trying to think through sort of the comp issue associated with flu and any thoughts you can provide us there.
I'll begin with the RePlas question. You're correct, Larry. In our remarks, we said that the submission would be now in Q3. You're also correct, that we did expect it originally in Q2. The delay is largely due to the government shutdown. Initially, we didn't believe that the shutdown would have an impact as we'd already paid the fee. Ironically, given the fact that we're on a fast-track process, the longer the shutdown went on, the less engagement we were able to get with the agency, and that's the primary reason for the delay. The fact that this was a new process for the FDA and for Teleflex required a lot more over-and-back communication with the agency, and that simply didn't happen as the shutdown went on a little bit longer than we'd anticipated, and that's what's driven the delay, Larry.
Okay.
Tom, the other part of the question?
You're asking about the comparability of this year versus last year on the flu? Is that?
Correct
question?
For the 1Q.
Yeah. We got off to a little bit slower start last year on the flu season, or at the end of 2018, I should say. It now has moved into full swing flu season, and we see a fairly comparable year-over-year comparisons.
Okay, terrific. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Matthew Mishan with KeyBanc. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning, thank you for taking the questions. Hey, Liam or Tom, you had mentioned headwinds from incremental tariffs. What is that assuming? Does that assume that the tariff's going to 25% on March 1st?
Tom, if you don't mind.
We actually assume the tariffs, yes, do increase, and in fact increased, in 2018, and this is a continuation of those tariffs through 2019. Essentially, we had previously spoken about a level of tariffs. As we sat down and reassessed at year-end, we updated the expectation to a greater impact for 2019.
Great. The investment spending that you're doing in growth areas, how long do you expect it to be elevated, and how should we think about the phasing of it over 2019?
Yeah. Some of the investments we're actually moving forward. We had in our LRP anticipated doing some investments within the Japanese market. It's a good problem to have, quite frankly. We got the Shonin approval much earlier than we'd anticipated, so we're actually moving that investment forward for NeoTract. The other investment behind NeoTract is really on the area of the direct-to-consumer campaigns that have been very, very successful in 2018. We want to continue those because they are an accelerator for top-line growth. The cadence of the investments, they will begin from Q1 in 2019 and remain throughout the year.
Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Matt Taylor with UBS. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask about MANTA, two things. First, with the early approval, guess I was a little surprised that you're not projecting any material revenue in 2019. Can you talk about why that is? For the commercial infrastructure build, do you actually need to build a separate team, or is this going to leverage some of the cardio teams that you already have in place? Just why so long to actually see some uptake given the uptake you've had in Europe?
Thanks, Matt. First of all, I want to say we're very pleased to receive the PMA approval in Q1. A panel review was not required. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we will now commence the limited market release in 2019. I think we're taking a reasonably cautious approach to the launch. We need to recruit some additional clinical sales heads, but it will be sold through our interventional sales force. We are rolling out what has been incredibly successful for us in both our vascular business unit, in our interventional neurology business unit with UroLift, and now in this business unit, which is a hunter-farmer model, where we will utilize our experienced sales force to begin to convert the accounts, and then we will roll out a clinical and a support function to continue the utilization of the product.
We will begin in the 20 sites in the U.S. that were part of the SAFE MANTA IDE clinical study, that's going to be our goal for Q2 and Q3. Maybe we're just being a little bit conservative, Matt, in our expectations of the revenue. We think at this stage, it's better off to be conservative than aggressive until we see the traction of the product in the marketplace. We continue to be very excited about the product. The clinical data for the product is compelling, with an over 70% reduction in major vascular complications. This is significant because according to a JAMA 2017 study, these patients require five additional days in hospital and are twice as likely to die. See hospitals on average $18,000 as a result.
MANTA continues to have a 96% success rate in hemostasis, and a median time to hemostasis reduced to 23 seconds from ranging from 6-10 minutes. The clinical data is compelling. We're very enthusiastic about the product. Don't take our comments that we don't have a lot of revenue baked in to think that we're not very enthusiastic. I think this, in time, could be proven to be one of our nicer token acquisitions in a long time.
Good. Thank you. Then just one follow-up on UroLift. I was hoping you might be able to expound on what you mean by making it the standard of care over time. What do you need to do to get from where you are today to a standard of care, and what exactly do you mean by that? I think most people think of that as meaning first-line therapy. You've already had five-year follow-up with a really robust PMA. Do you need more evidence? Do you need more time? How will it expand the opportunity when you get to that point?
I think that to make it a standard of care, we need to get an improvement on where we are today. Let's take a step back and look at your standard urologist. Your standard urologist would see 75 unique BPH patients every month. On average, urologists we've trained are treating four of those patients every month. I think the headway for growth is still a long way, we're very early in the penetration at this moment in time. Over time, we see getting deeper into that penetration and getting a larger portion of those 75 patients, once we have a more significant portion, then it would become a frontline therapy and would become the standard of care. Again, Matt, we're so early on in the penetration. We've only just trained just over 1,900 urologists of the 12,000 urologists within the United States.
We see significant headroom for future growth. When we have, let's call it 6,000 urologists trained, which are the ones that treat over 80% of the BPH patients, we would be further along the way of making it the standard of care. Once we get more of those 75 patients, we'd also see it becoming the standard of care.
Great. Thanks a lot for the time, Liam.
Cheers. Thanks, Matt.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Brian Weinstein with William Blair. Your line is open.
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Going back to a question that was asked a little bit earlier, I know we've hit this a bunch of different times, can you just be a little bit more specific and quantify the impact from all the additional spending that you're pulling forward here? I recognize that this was thought about in the long-range plan, we're seeing no leverage again from gross margin to operating margin, similar to Q4. I just kind of want to understand, ex some of these investments, what the leverage from gross to operating margin might have been in 2019.
I'll talk about the investments, and I'll let Tom then chime in with the leverage. In additional investments, just in UroLift and in MANTA, there is about $15 million of additional investments we're making just in those two big buckets in all the areas we spoke about, Brian. On top of that, there's the $10 million that we had originally contemplated in additional sales heads that we're putting in behind UroLift as we continue to drive the top-line growth for that product. I've always said, growth ain't free, so we've got to invest and continue to develop clinical papers and so on and so forth in order to get there. I'll let Tom answer the leverage question or the drop-through question if that investment wasn't there.
Sure. As you know, our operating margin is currently expected to expand by 80 to 130 basis points. The investments that Liam just outlined being $15 million, largely relates to the investment for UroLift in Japan as well as the development of the U.S. market for MANTA. If you were to back that out, that operating margin would go from 80 to 130 basis points to 135 to 185 basis points. That doesn't factor in the point that Liam just made relative to the increase in the sales force for NeoTract. It would show a nice margin expansion. I think, as Liam mentioned, we are pulling some of those investments forward, and as the businesses begin to grow, obviously we'll offset that investment and continue to drive revenue and margin expansion.
Perfect. Then as a follow-up, you do have a couple of businesses that continue to be a little bit weaker than, obviously, corporate average, but Anesthesia, Surgical in particular. Can you just talk about opportunities to start to potentially improve growth rates in those businesses? They haven't been covered as much on the call. Thanks.
Absolutely, Brian. I would start by saying that in Q4, actually, Surgical, even though it was negative, it was less negative than we had originally anticipated. If you recall on the Q3 earnings call, I mentioned that we expected to grow 8.6% in Q4, and we actually grew 9.1% in Q4. One of the improvements within there was the Surgical business combined with Vascular OEM and Interventional Urology. To answer your question regarding those two businesses, I think as we go into 2019, Surgical will no longer have that headwind of the business that we made the decision to exit. That will be more profound in the first half of the year versus the second half of the year. Our Anesthesia business grew by 2.1% in this quarter just gone. I think that our Anesthesia business has shown an improvement in 2018 over 2017.
We continue to believe that business shows improvement on a year-over-year basis. Actually on a full-year basis, it grew by 3.6%, which is about right for a business in the space that it's in. Don't forget, anesthesia is the business unit as we go into 2020 and 2021, where RePlas revenue will be recognized. That will be a driver for growth in the future. We continue to see growth in that business and our laryngoscope play. We continue to work with our laryngeal mask portfolio and others. I think a 3.6% growth on an annual basis is about right for that business, Brian.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Anthony Petrone with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Thanks. Good morning. I have a couple on UroLift and then one on restructuring. Just on UroLift maybe, Liam, the Japan opportunity. Can you give a sense of how many urologists you're targeting in that market, and how pricing settles out there? Then a follow-up on UroLift would be, when you look at Japan and UroLift 2 sort of in relation to the 325 milestone in 2021, it seems like these two drivers will make that more achievable. Maybe just some thoughts around that, and then I'll have a follow-up for Tom. Thanks.
We estimate that the total Japanese market is approximately $2 billion. Initially, we will be targeting, and what the investment that we're putting in is to target some of the key opinion leaders, podium-speaking opinion leaders, that we will require in order to get the reimbursement. We will begin to get urologists to use the product in selective cases now that we have the approval, so that they can then write to the authorities, identifying this as a priority product if they think it is a priority product for them. Regarding the pricing, the pricing will be determined by the reimbursement. There are approximately 1,900 urologists in the United States.
Trained
trained urologists within the United States. The urologists within Japan, we will get that data as we start to penetrate within the marketplace. I think that the pricing, as I said, will be determined by the reimbursement. We expect to get the reimbursement 12 to 18 months after the Shonin. We think that the reimbursement would be quite similar to what we get within the United States. That would be determined, Anthony, at the time we get that reimbursement. The work that we're doing now in Japan is to ensure that the authorities realize what an important technology this is. There is a significant connection between the Japanese Urological Association and the American Urological Association, which should help us.
Helpful. Just to follow up there, Japan and UroLift 2 in relation to the $325 million milestone in 2021. It seems like this certainly makes that a more probable target. Maybe just some thoughts there.
I would say, Anthony, even before this, I thought that was a very probable target. We always, and I've said it many times, that we anticipate and expect to pay out that full milestone. Nothing has changed in my thinking. The revenue that we'll be generating in Japan will begin in the latter half of 2020. Obviously that will be ahead of our original thought, and you are correct, that should help that milestone.
Thanks again. Just restructuring for Tom. A new one announced today with the release. Maybe just a recap on, this seems to be new and not related to the existing programs. Sort of when you wrap all of the programs up, where do you expect the total annualized cost savings to be once all of these are completed, and sort of when do you expect that to happen? Thanks.
Sure. Well, of the programs that are currently outstanding in operational. Some of that that we've kicked off, frankly, have run their course. Of those still outstanding, we expect total savings ranging from $122 million to $136 million once fully implemented. I would say that in terms of savings that are still remaining to be realized, that's more in the range of $60 million to $70 million. The program that we launched this morning, or initiated recently and announced this morning, really is a program that won't start to realize any savings until 2021 and 2022.
Anthony, I apologize, I didn't answer your question directly. There are approximately 8,000 urologists in Japan.
Thank you. Thanks again.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Isaac Ro with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Good morning, guys. Thank you. Another question on UroLift. Specifically, if you could maybe give us a sense of the contribution that you expect from UroLift II in revenue this year, given your comments around the timing and sales force ramp. I'm curious, on that comment, it seems like you said that the key swing factor to the pace of ramp is going to be training for your sales force. Can you just talk a little bit about the key hurdles there? I would think that's a pretty straightforward thing that you have good line of sight on, but kind of curious as to whether there's a reasonable range to think about of how quickly that could play out.
The UroLift II, we expect to roll that out in the latter half of 2019. There won't be a revenue pickup from it because the pricing for the UroLift II is the same as UroLift I. We don't anticipate to have a big but we will get a margin pickup as we begin to roll it out. The real play here is to move from the mid-70s to the high 70s in gross margin as we roll out the UroLift II, and we will begin in the latter half of 2019, this year. Just to answer your question on the training, one of the reasons that we snowballed the rollout of UL II was to allow our salespeople to train urologists on the median lobe, which was a new indication we got in 2018.
We didn't want to distract our sales force and take away from the growth engine by having them do two things at the one time, training on the median lobe and rolling out the UL II. Now, we should have the training on the median lobe completed with most of our urologists by halfway through 2019, and that would free up the resources to roll out the UL II, as I said, in the latter half of 2019. I hope that makes it clear.
Yeah, that makes sense. Thank you.
Thanks.
Then just to follow up on the restructuring program, maybe a little bit more of a longer-term question here. I'm wondering if some of the steps that you're taking here could have benefit to the company's free cash performance, and maybe to the tax rate. It'd be helpful if you could maybe quantify the extent to which those might play out. Thanks.
The real focus for us is to continue to drive earnings accretion, and obviously, that'll play into cash flow as well. With the recent program that we've initiated, it's expecting to deliver savings of $11 million-$14 million on top of the programs that are already outstanding. We would see this as a way to kind of solidify, if you will, our free cash flow. It's not as much of a tax play as it is in terms of driving cash flow savings.
Got it. Thank you, guys.
Thank you. Our next question comes from David Turkaly with JMP Securities. Your line is open.
Thanks. I just want to make sure I heard that last part, the restructuring right. $60 million-$70 million in pre-tax savings coming from prior programs. This one, $12 million-$14 million. I just want to confirm that, and then if that's the case, you've talked about your long-term gross margin plans. It would seem that getting north of 60%, you could already sort of have identified or put yourself in that range with the programs you've announced that you technically wouldn't need any other new ones. Just, I guess, your thoughts on that.
I think the point you're making is a valid one. We have good line of sight to our gross margin target of 60%-61%. We're guiding to within pretty close range of that for this year. That includes the impact of the tariffs. Our hope is that perhaps those tariffs aren't in place in the future, and that could provide another benefit. Yes, we do have very clear line of sight with the activities currently in place, to get to that gross margin target.
I guess maybe just.
I would just point out, David, that that is true, but not all the restructuring programs would be completed by 2021.
That's a fair point.
Got it, then the manufacturing footprint realignment. Over the years, we've seen several of those. I imagine that you may not have as many opportunities to announce more along in that exact bucket or that category. I guess just any comment on the footprint, and are there still opportunities to consolidate manufacturing facilities?
David, it's Liam here. We continue to always look at our business right across, not alone in manufacturing, but in all areas of our business as part of our ongoing process. The interesting thing about restructuring and manufacturing alignment is that every time you do a scale acquisition, there is the potential to identify more opportunities. It's a little bit like dealer to direct. We think we are well down the road with our dealer direct, and we do an acquisition like VSI, and it identifies other opportunities, and we saw that in 2017. It's an ongoing process, and it's something we look at on a fairly regular basis.
Thanks.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Kristen Stewart with Barclays. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning, everybody. Thanks for letting me take a question. If I'm doing the math right, if I look at the incremental sales from NeoTract this quarter as well as the incremental sales from VSI this quarter, which were really quite strong, it looks like combined, those two products basically contributed a little over five percentage points to the top line, which would imply, I guess the legacy business was flat. Am I thinking about that correctly in doing the math?
Our growth within the quarter, our constant currency growth was 9.1%. Our growth, it was 9.4% into the M&A. When we bridged, we bridged to 3.7% with our run rate through Q3, and we said UroLift would add 3%. The IDE would add 1.3%, and the improvement would be 60 basis points, I think. If you look at what actually happened, UroLift just did modestly better, but the core business, actually, the 60 basis points of improvement was better, and did better than that 60 basis point improvement. Kristen, it gets to the point where trying to extract VSI from the core becomes more and more difficult as we go through it. I don't want people to think that we're going to continue to talk about our business in core, non-core, because there's a few moving pieces.
You also have the fact that we exited a business in 2018 that had an impact. Our core was very much in line with our expectations within that quarter, and we had a really strong second half of the year with our overall business, and I think we're in great spot to line up to do our 6%-7% in 2019.
Okay. Just thinking about the pricing dynamics for this year. I think you guys ended up with 70 basis points of favorable price. I believe that includes the benefit of distributor conversions. Should we think about the components of growth next year, maybe less relying on that effect of distributor conversions? Do you still have more to go, or will the growth kind of still come more from new products?
Sorry.
Okay.
I apologize, Kristen. I didn't mean to talk. Sorry, I apologize.
It's all good.
Basically, you're correct. Almost all of that pricing came from our go-directs. Our pricing in 2018 from core pricing was neutral, and you could expect the same in 2019. Pretty neutral pricing overall. We don't anticipate, or we haven't built in, any go-directs or significant go-directs in 2019.
Thank you very much.
Yeah. I would say, Kristen, to answer your question on the core business, the core business was approximately 3.7% in the second half of 2018, just to reinforce my point on the improvement in the core business as we went through the year.
Okay. I'll take that offline .
Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Matson with Needham. Your line is open.
Hi. Thanks for squeezing me in. I guess just wanted to go back to UroLift in Japan. Can you just talk about the market there for treating BPH? Is it similar to the U.S.? In other words, are there the same types of laser products there and et cetera? Thanks.
Yeah. Mike, well, it's the second largest medical device market in the world outside the U.S., and they're very developed. They would have all the technologies that we would have in the United States. They use similar therapies. They actually do more surgery than we traditionally do within the United States. The other anomaly within the Japanese culture, which I think will help us, is that the whole area of sexual dysfunction is probably more highlighted than it would be in a Western culture. I think that that will be something that we will be promoting with our urology partners and the urologists in Japan, because men tend to stay sexually active much later in life than they traditionally do in the Western world.
Okay, thanks. Just with the RePlas being pushed out by a quarter, you mentioned this post-approval efficacy trial, and other things you have to do before you can really get into kind of a full launch. Does that imply that you're not expecting any meaningful revenue from that this year? Once you start selling it, particularly to the military, is this going to be kind of fairly lumpy where they come in and just order a bunch, or is it going to be more of a kind of a gradual ramp in the sales? Thanks.
Yeah, Mike, you're correct. We don't have a revenue expectation for RePlas in 2019. The post-market study will not prohibit us from selling the product. The FDA have just mandated that we do that study post-launch, but we will still be in a launch phase. Regarding your question on the military and the lumpiness of it, we do not expect the military to come in and place one blanket order. We expect this to be a gradual adoption of this technology. We believe that they will begin in the Special Forces because even though we're in peacetime, there's always some activity, and this product has incredible relevance in the battlefield where soldiers would require plasma, and the current plasma offerings are not applicable in that type of an environment because you either need to thaw them or they're in a glass jar.
I would believe we'd see a modest pickup beginning there and then ramp. Once it's established, it can be somewhat lumpy to your expression, because they will fill out the kit bags. Now, we will try to manage the timing of that so that they're not filling out the kit bags for the Air Force, the Navy, the Marines, and the military all in the one time. That should help smooth it out. We have a reasonable amount of our EZ-IO Vidacare business that currently goes through the military, and we have a good call point into that area of business.
Okay, great. Thank you.
Thank you. Once again, ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to ask a question at this time, please press star then one on your touch-tone telephone. Our next question is a follow-up from Lawrence Keusch with Raymond James. Your line is open.
Okay, thanks. Just two quick ones, guys. Just on the APAC region. Growth was 5.5%. Constant currency in the fourth quarter is 6.7% in the third quarter. We've obviously now anniversaried the go direct o ver there in China. Just wanted to get some sense of what's sort of the right way to think about the growth, and I recognize that, UroLift, at some point will influence that. Prior to that launch, what's the right way to think about APAC and where can that go? The other quick question was just on the free cash flow. If I remember correctly, Tom, I think you guys are looking for a billion and a half dollars in free cash flow generation over the course of the LRP, and just wanted to see how you were thinking about that as we come out of 2018.
Okay, Larry. I'll take APAC first. APAC, you're right, grew quarter four, 5.5%. It actually grew by 6.6% on a year basis in 2018. What I expect from APAC in 2019 and in the longer horizon is that it will grow in the mid to upper single-digits. We continue to have momentum as we've gone through the year. China grew by, I think, 5.2% in the fourth quarter. It was up against a really tough comparable. It was almost 10.5%-11% in the prior Q4. We've anniversaried the go-to direct. We've continued to build momentum in China. Along with that, we will then register the UroLift in other geographies. We have identified three geographies within APAC that we are working to register the UroLift product, and that's above and beyond the Shonin that we received for Japan.
We are also rolling out some initiatives around clinical education in different geographies within APAC. We believe that will be an accelerator as well. We feel China or APAC is one of our key drivers with interventional access and with Interventional Urology. Again, it goes back to the old Teleflex philosophy, not all growth is equal. Those three areas of growth are all accretive to our longer-term growth margin objectives. Free cash flow?
Sure. Larry, just on the free cash flow, to your point, yes, we had guided to approximately a billion and a half of free cash flow over the timeframe 2019 to 2021. We're still on track towards that from an operating standpoint. I will say there are two kind of non-operating impacts that have come up since then. One is that the performance of some of the acquisitions is outperforming the initial accounting estimates, if you will.
To the extent we pay out more in contingent consideration, such as the prior discussion we had on NeoTract, that would impact free cash flow as a reduction in cash flow from operations. Additionally, the restructuring program that we just announced was not contemplated in that guidance. That isn't all that meaningful from a longer term. But i f you were to adjust for the contingent consideration payments, yes, we're still on track for that $1.5 billion free cash flow target.
Okay, terrific. Thank you.
Yep.
Thank you. Our next question is a follow from Kristen Stewart with Barclays. Your line is open.
Hey, thanks for taking the follow-up. Just real quickly, I think that you guys Well, I heard you guys reiterate the long-range plan. I'm just wondering if the restructuring programs that you announced today, which said they start realizing savings in 2021, which I would assume are pretty small, how that just kind of plays into your confidence in the operating margin performance, maybe getting to the lower end or the higher end, just given some of the pacings of the investments as well that you're making in the business. Also the tax rate. That came in a little bit below where I was anticipating this year. How do you still feel about the longer-term tax guidance that's out there?
Sure. As we just think about the tax rate, I think we are still of the expectation that the tax rate will continue to move upwards in subsequent years. That's largely due to a shift in mix, where we are expecting more and more income to be generated in the U.S., and that tax rate, although reduced through the recent Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is still higher than our average. Now, the drivers of that increase in the U.S. income is businesses such as the UroLift products, as well as Vascular Solutions that are growing above average, have above average margins, and their growth is predominantly in the U.S. We do still expect the tax rate to move up as time progresses.
I will say that our assessment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has been a little bit more favorable than our initial interpretation of the acts. We're seeing a little bit of favorability from that. I'd say the two of them fairly well wash out over the longer term. I would, right now, assume the tax rate is still moving in line with the longer-term projection. The first focus area.
The 2020-
Right
This restructuring program has a modest impact in 2021, Kristen. It's going to be beyond that, we'll receive the benefit of this new restructuring program.
It's not like there should be any significant level of upside or greater confidence in the higher end of the operating margin LRP, just given that it's going to be more modest.
As Tom said, the upside on the LRP is going to come from improvement in mix more so than coming from this latest restructuring program. We've continued to be very bullish about things like UroLift, very bullish about VSI, very bullish about MANTA, very bullish about RePlas, and very bullish about Asia Pacific and Vidacare. All of those, if they perform better, will deliver significant mix that could be a potential for upside in our LRP on the growth and operating margin.
Just to think about the kind of the cadence of those savings. I had mentioned that of the 122-136 in total program savings, just to clarify, that is inclusive of the program just announced today. Of that savings, about $60 million-$70 million is still outstanding. Through the timeframe 2021, we expect to realize about half of that 60-70. As you can see, we're creating some benefit to extend beyond the LRP timeframe.
Okay, perfect. Thanks very much, guys.
Thanks, Kristen.
Thank you. I'm showing no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back over to Jake Elguicze for closing remarks.
Thanks, operator. Thank you everyone for joining us on the call today. This concludes the Teleflex Incorporated fourth quarter 2018 earnings conference call.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. Have a wonderful day.