And welcome to Marriott Vacations Worldwide First Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. A question and answer session will follow As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Neal Goldner, Vice President, Investor Relations.
Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, Rob, and welcome to the Marriott Vacations Worldwide first quarter 2019 earnings conference call. I am joined today by Steve Weisz, President and Chief Executive Officer and John Geller, Executive Vice President And Chief Financial And Administrative Officer. I do need to remind everyone that many of our comments today are not historical facts and are considered forward looking statements under federal securities laws. These statements are subject to numerous future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by our comments. Forward this morning along with our comments on this call are effective only today and will not be updated as actual events unfold.
Throughout the call, we will make references to non GAAP financial information. You can find a reconciliation of non GAAP financial measures in the schedules attached to our press release as well as the Investor Relations page of our website at ir.mbwc.com. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Steve Weisz, President CEO of Marriott Vacations Worldwide. Thanks, Neil. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our first quarter earnings call.
I'm extremely pleased with how adjusted EBITDA for the excluding the impact of the sale of VRI Europe, adjusted EBITDA grew 6%, driven primarily by growth from our vacation ownership segment as well as synergies related to the acquisition. Consolidated contract sales grew 5% on a combined basis including nearly 10% growth As we mentioned last quarter, we expect to deliver strong sales growth in our legacy MVW business throughout the year and we started the year off well. We also continue to expect that this growth will be as we implement strategies employed in the Marriott vacation ownership business across our expanded portfolio. We expect growth in the Vistana and Hyatt businesses to accelerate as we move throughout the year. We saw some of this growth starting to occur towards the latter part of the first quarter and it has continued into the current quarter.
Looking at just the legacy MVW North America Vacation ownership business, tour flow grew over 6% in the quarter, including a 9% increase in first time buyer tours and a 5% as well as continued growth in our newer sales distributions. I'm also pleased to report that our tour package pipeline remains strong, growing 5% in the first quarter as compared to the same time last year and activated tours with the scheduled arrival date During the remainder of 2019 grew nearly 12% over the same time last year. VPG for the legacy MVW North America Vacation Ownership business remains strong at $3777 up more than 1% year Shifting to the legacy ILG Vacation Ownership business, contract sales on a combined basis declined 2% year over year. While tour flow increased 3%. VPG was down 6% due to a slight decline in closing efficiency in the quarter due in part to for buyers with FICO scores below 600.
While the program previously generated incremental contract sales, the average delinquency rate on those sales was significantly higher than the rest higher cash down payment. We estimate that this program changed alone accounting for roughly a third of the decline in VPG in the quarter. While negatively impacting the top line, we believe this change is in the best interest of the company longer term. We continue our work on to grow Vistana's contract sales in VPG over time to levels closer to those achieved by Marriott Vacation Club, as we focus on best practices and more efficient and profitable marketing channels. We've already made very good progress aligning our pricing, sales incentive programs and income qualifications across the system to help ensure consistent messaging across the brands.
We are also focused on growing tour flow and building the tour package pipeline by expanding our call transfer program with Marriott International. Are marketing linkage opportunities across the Marriott branded lodging properties and encore package production. And while still early in the integration process, we are excited in the tour flow growth in the quarter as well as the tour package pipeline that's been created. In fact, as compared to the same time last year, and we added 3 new linkage arrangements into legacy Starwood properties in the quarter. All good signs for future performance from these brands.
We're also very excited about our new San Francisco property that we will be rebranding this month. This property, along with its and contributor towards our future contract sales growth. Our contract sales guidance includes contribution from this new property, It also reflects continued improvements from the existing business mainly from many of the initiatives I've just mentioned, as well as from anticipated further growth in tour volumes as we continue to expand profitable programs across the brands. In fact, we just recently completed an agreement to enter into a call transfer program with a major rental car company and are looking forward to what this arrangement can do to drive incremental tour flow. However, as I previously mentioned, what we are most looking forward to is ability to tap into the digital marketing environment.
In the second quarter, we expect to launch a pilot program with Marriott International. Similar to our traditional call transfer program, this marketing channel will allow us to make attractive offers and promotions to users of marriott.com, which we expect will drive higher tour flow to our Marriott, Weston and Sheraton branded locations. We also see similar opportunities in other social media and digital advertising platforms. We recently began piloting various programs and I'm pleased to say have begun to see some very positive signs. We are optimistic these programs will continue to ramp up and provide us not only with incremental tour flow and contract sales, but also do so in a cost efficient manner.
Looking ahead to 2020, we have begun focusing on product enhancements for the various brands, specifically we are working hard to develop an integrated product form that can be leveraged across the Marriott, Weston and Sheraton brands, enhancing the overall value proposition for our owners and customers. It will take time to finalize and roll out this new product form. However, we are very excited about the potential it will provide we look forward to updating you in the future as this work evolves. For our exchange and third party management segment year over year results were negatively impacted by our disposition of the interest of our interest in VRI Europe in the fourth quarter of 20 18. As you may recall, this disposition provided us with a great opportunity to recycle capital while still maintaining our overall strategic focus.
In addition, as expected and in line with our discussion last quarter, we also saw a decline in active members quarter, reflecting the impact of non renewal of certain agreements as compared to the prior year. Looking ahead, our strategy for these businesses includes diversifying beyond the traditional vacation ownership exchange business, increasing average revenue per member identifying and expanding benefits to exchange members and of course, adding new resorts and properties to the network. Now let me shift towards our continuing now let me shift towards our continuing integration efforts. As I mentioned in the past, we view this integration as a once in a lifetime opportunity to not only align processing and gain operational efficiencies from the combination, but also a chance to make a transformational change We continue to target total annual run rate savings in excess of $100,000,000 within the next 3 years. And we are planning to stop there.
The teams are working to identify additional opportunities to exceed this target. As it relates to savings realized to date, I'm pleased to say that as of the end of the first quarter, we've achieved run rate savings of roughly $40,000,000. While there is still a lot of work remaining, we continue to target over $50,000,000 of run rate savings by the end of the year equating to roughly $35,000,000 to $40,000,000 of in the year savings. Before I turn the call over to John, let me touch upon our full year outlook. Last quarter, we laid out our expectations for full year contract sales growth of 7% to 12% on a combined basis.
And with that strong top line growth, we projected adjusted EBITDA between $7.45 $785,000,000. I am very pleased to say that given first quarter financial performance, we are reaffirming our full year guidance for 2019. I'm very excited about the many opportunities our newly expanded business provides. And I'm proud to say that even with all the changes occurring, we are still projecting significant growth from the business at the same time. With that,
Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. I am very pleased with how we've begun the year generating strong first quarter results all in line with our we have included additional supplemental financial results in our earnings release, including 2018 financial information that combines legacy ILG's first quarter 2018 results to $6,000,000 in the first quarter of 2019. On a combined basis, this represents a 4% increase from the prior year. While these results were in line with our expectations, it's important to highlight two items that unfavorably impacted our year over year growth in adjusted EBITDA. First, as you know, we do not adjust for the impact of revenue reportability when calculating adjusted EBITDA.
However, as a result of strong contract sales volume in the latter half of the first quarter, which will be closed and reported as revenue in the second quarter, Adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter was unfavorably impacted by roughly $21,000,000 $13,000,000 higher than last year. Remember this is simply a timing matter as the sales have occurred but revenue will be recognized when the contracts close. 2nd, year over year growth was negatively impacted by $4,000,000 of profit in the prior year quarter related to the disposition of VRIE Europe. Adjusting for both of those items, adjusted EBITDA on a combined base would have grown 13% year over year. Now let's turn first to our Vacation Ownership segment.
Segment adjusted EBITDA totaled $171,000,000 in the first quarter. On a combined basis, this represents an increase of 5% year over a combined basis would have increased $21,000,000 or 12%. In our development business, consolidated contract sales on a combined basis increased 5 percent to $354,000,000 in the 1st quarter including a 10% increase related to legacy MVW. Our total development 2% to the margin was $67,000,000, an increase of 30% over last year on a combined basis. Adjusted development margin percentage on a combined primarily to lower inventory costs.
In our financing business, $67,000,000 in the first quarter of 2019. Financing revenue net of expenses and consumer financing interest expense increased $4,000,000 or 12 percent on a combined basis. These results reflect an $8,000,000 increase in revenue primarily from our growing no receivable balance, partially offset by roughly $4,000,000 and a slightly higher cost of funds. Our notes receivable portfolio continues to perform very well. The average FICO score of buyers who financed with us in the quarter was 744, while delinquency rates remained near historic lows and financing propensity remains strong at nearly 62%.
In our rental business, on a combined basis, rental revenues increased 2% to $147,000,000 and rental revenues net of expenses on a combined basis increased 4 percent to $45,000,000. These results were driven by a 3 percent increase increased 4% on a combined basis and revenues net of expenses increased 5% to $59,000,000 in the quarter. These results were driven by higher Turning to the Exchange And Third Party Management segment, adjusted EBITDA on a combined basis was down $15,000,000 year over year, including $5,000,000 resulting from the disposition of VRI Europe in December of 2018 Roughly half of the remaining decline related to the expected impact in the quarter of the non renewal of contracts as compared to the prior year period with the remainder being related a combined basis was down 3% in the quarter, driven largely by certain inventory supply and customer demand challenges. As Steve mentioned, we continue to work to identify new incremental revenue streams for these businesses and we'll update you as the year progresses. Turning to our G and synergy savings and the timing of technology and other spending, partially offset by normal inflationary cost increases.
We achieved nearly $8,000,000 of synergy savings across the business in the quarter and remain on target to achieve $35,000,000 to $40,000,000 of in the year savings for 2019. I do want to highlight that as a result of the ILG acquisition, we have begun a comprehensive review of our vacation ownership property and equipment to determine the best strategic for the hotels and other non core assets. As you might expect, a key focus of the review will be to evaluate opportunities to reduce holdings spend in markets that create incremental cost effective sales locations in areas of high customer demand. The result of this review could have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets, which in turn could result in non cash impairments. While work continues few years.
In this regard, subsequent to the end of first quarter, we entered into a contract to sell land and improvements associated with the future development of roughly 600 units at an existing resort location in Orlando, Florida for $10,000,000 As a result, we recorded fact that the book value of the assets include common area cost incurred when we built the existing 300 units at the resort. As you may recall from when we undertook a similar effort subsequent to our spin off from Marriott International in 2011, The impact of these efforts will be excluded from adjusted cash equivalents totaled $222,000,000. We also had approximately $132,000,000 of gross vacation ownership notes receivable eligible for under our $600,000,000 revolving credit facility. Our total corporate debt outstanding at the end of the quarter totaled $2,200,000,000 This excludes $1,700,000,000 associated with our non recourse securitized notes receivable. From a leverage perspective, assuming the companies were combined for the last four quarters and including $100,000,000 of total synergy savings, Our combined net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio at the end of the quarter would be 2.7 times, slightly higher than our long term target of 2 to 2.5 times.
Looking ahead to the second quarter, we are targeting a term securitization, which we will include notes from both legacy MVW and legacy ILG brands for the first time. While work continues towards closing later this month, we expect note volumes of roughly $450,000,000 and given current market conditions, expect the cost of funds and excess spread to be more favorable than our prior year transaction. Regarding our return of capital in the first quarter, we repurchased 1,200,000 shares for $106,000,000 at an average price per share of $86.32, and we also paid dividends of $41,000,000. Now turning to the outlook for 2019, as Steve mentioned, we began the year strong and in line with our expectations. With the first quarter behind us, the positive changes we are making to align policies and procedures primarily in the marketing and sales arena and our progress on progress as we move throughout open the call up
session.
Our first question comes from Jared Shojaian with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.
Good morning, Jared.
Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So I know it's early in the year to to be updating guidance and you're still working through the integration. So it's probably even more reason, why people really shouldn't have expected a change, but as you talk about your expectations today, I think you said the quarter was in line with what you were expecting. You also had the reportability shift into the 2nd quarter and it sounds like the end of the quarter got better than what you were expecting.
So I guess my question is, are you feeling more optimistic and confident about the full year guidance today versus what you were thinking a couple of months ago.
I guess, this is Steve. I guess, we feel equally optimistic as we did the 1st part of the year. As you might imagine, we were thoughtful about how we thought the year would play out. That's when we gave you the guidance that we gave you. There's been nothing that we've seen in the first quarter that caused us to feel any less optimistic And if anything, it just reaffirms that the strategies that we are embarking on and employing are certainly delivering the results we're looking for.
Great. Thank you. And then I think your ILG legacy ILG contract sales were down about 2% and you talked about the intentional programs, which drove that. I think I may have missed this. I think you said something about a third of the impact driven by some of those intentional programs, but I'm a little confused by that.
So I guess maybe another way of asking it is excluding some of those intentional decisions, can you give us a sense as to what the legacy ILG business would have looked like on contract sales and VPG?
Yes. Just to clarify, I said about a third of the 6 point drop in VPG or call it two points. Was attributable to that one change we made in the sub 600 FICO scores for, for the Sheraton brand that they were using. The other things are, as we have, we've gone through the quarter harmonizing pricing and sales incentives, income qualifications. And, when you have a sales force, a distributor sales force, such it is.
You should expect to have some short term impact, on performance, and that's what we experienced in the first quarter. But as we continue by working to increase VPGs by transitioning their programs, policies to align with our legacy MVW approach in terms of aligning pricing and first aid benefit grids and expanding lower cost marketing channels and eliminating high cost ones and expanding call transfer. We absolutely believe that this will turn the corner. And in fact, we've seen some evidence of that. I'll give you some sense in the Vistana businesses.
So for instance, in February, contract sales in Vistana were down about 8.5%. And then it turned around and grew 2.5 2.7% in March, and we've seen some continuing improvement in April. So we think we're returning the corner But unfortunately, there's no magic light switch, which you can just flip the switch and everything changes. You have to take the time to go through training. And our experience has been as you make a subset of changes such as we've done, that it just takes a while for everybody to try to adjust to the new normal.
And we're very encouraged by what we see.
Great. That's helpful. Thank you. I'll jump back in the queue.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from Brian Dobson with Nomura. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, Brian. Hey, good morning. So I guess continuing on that line of questioning, when it comes to the sales cadence for the legacy ILG unit, does your back half guidance, I guess, do you contemplate an acceleration in contract sales in the back half of the year? Is that a portion of your contract sales guidance? Or do you take a more muted viewpoint?
No, we believe that in fact the second half of the year will be materially better than the first half of the year.
All right, great. And then in terms of new product offerings, I guess what what consumer are you going after in relationship to your existing consumer? Is it a slightly more call it
slightly more middle of
the road consumer or what?
Well, we've done a fair amount of work already on understanding each of the brands, the value propositions, looking at the demographics from where we source customers, etcetera. And I would say to you that the Marriott Weston And Hyatt brands are not terribly dissimilar. There are some nuances between the brands And the only thing that's slightly lower is Sheridan, but that's not a material thing. It's certainly not a mid market offering. So I would say there's maybe some minor tweaks, but nothing of any substance that I would be focused on here, Brian.
Okay. And then with Sheridan, have you spoken with Marriott about their efforts to revamp that brand? And do you think that, that I guess in the medium term that brand will look stronger or are you contemplating perhaps rebranding your time share offering for Sheridan?
Well, we certainly have no intentions of rebranding our vacation ownership properties that carry the Sheraton flag today. Regarding yes, of course, we've talked to Marriott. We know a fair amount about what they're doing in terms of repositioning that brand. I would argue that It's a brand that has languished over time and has lost some of its luster. And I think Marriott's doing its best to try to restore that.
We're encouraged by that and we think we'll do nothing but enhance the value of the brand name that's on our vacation ownership resorts. Thank you. Thanks, Brian.
Our next question comes from David Katz with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, David. Hi, good morning, everyone. How are you?
Great. How are you?
Very good. So I just wanted to ask we're always, trying to process some of the fluidity around the business, you know, quarter in, quarter out. And obviously, we're trying to process the rate at which you can and you have integrated the businesses. What would have to happen what would be the blocks that would have to build in order to get to the higher end of the guidance range or, or above it, you know, versus what the blocks would look like to wind up at the lower end of the range. And I'm not even going to mention below it.
You're talking about current year EBITDA guidance?
Yes.
Purely as it relates to synergies?
No, I mean, just more generally, yes. Yes.
No, I mean, I think, I think, 1st and foremost, a lot of stuff hit on here in terms of the acceleration of growth and the time share businesses. So as he talked about, we started to kind of turn the corner there here over the last couple of months. And so, as we continue traction on the changes we've made, that's going to go a long way towards getting us towards the higher end of the range when you think about our overall vacation ownership business model. Clearly on the synergy side, if we can outperform in terms of the $35,000,000 to $40,000,000 of in the year. And we're trending at a good rate.
A lot of the additional synergies that'll come into place or later in the year, because I think as I've talked about in the past, are tied more to some of the major HR system and financial reporting system changes that are underway, but really won't get done till towards the end of the year. So We continue to work hard and try and outperform even our own expectations to get those synergies in place.
Got it. Thank you very much.
Right. Our next question is from Patrick Scholes with SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please proceed with your question.
A couple of questions here. First, on the legacy ILG Vistana, would you say at this point, It has been performing at above or below your initial underwriting standards for that acquisition.
I would say overall at, I mean, in all fairness, the last half of twenty eighteen. I think it underperformed a bit. We think we talked about that at the at our call in February. But all things considered, when you think about the complexity and the size of this acquisition, it's not all that material. So, I think it's performing about what we thought it was.
We have, I'm happy to report that we have some additional opportunities, that we had not previously seen, as you might imagine, in a businesses size, you can't see everything when you're going through due diligence. So, we think there's some other stuff there that we can take advantage of and we kind of bake that into our thinking going forward terms of our guidance and how we think about life going forward. Okay.
Thank you. Then my next question concern you briefly mentioned a pilot, digital pilot program. I wonder what would that look like? Let's say I'm hypothetically booking a Marriott reservation, would I get online? Would I get a pop up ad?
Maybe a little bit more color on what consumers can expect to see.
Without getting into the particulars, to be honest, one of the things we're pilot is a couple of different executions of how exactly that might look, but that's the concept, is that, as you're in the of booking a lodging reservation on marriott.com, then you're going to be presented an opportunity to take advantage of a value promotion, a package, etcetera, that we would offer. And should you choose to do that, then obviously we'll take down the path of booking that and which ultimately will result in a tour. So but that's the concept. It's really think of it this way. It's no more than electronic version of what a call transfer does today, which is the same thing where an agent says hey, would you like this and you either opt in or opt out?
Okay. Good. Looking forward to seeing that. And then last question here, and I apologize if I'm splitting hairs a little bit. When you raised your EPS guidance up a little bit and I sort of back into the share repurchases.
Looks like that raise was implies a couple more cents than just share repurchases Any changes to your assumptions in depreciation or interest? Am I thinking about this correctly?
No. It's really just the share repurchases that we had done through the end of the quarter. So it could be, if it's a couple of I mean, yes, in terms of your numbers.
Next question comes from Jared Johan with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.
Hi, again. Thanks for taking my follow-up. So last quarter, you were talking about potential available capacity to repurchase $380,000,000 to $480,000,000 of stock in 2019. But you also weren't sure what the ILG business interruption insurance proceeds would be. So Two part question.
I'm wondering if you have an update on the insurance proceeds and also if you still feel good about the $3.80 to $4.80 or maybe some things broke more positively perhaps than you expected?
Now, in terms of the BI, we're still working through that. I think, we expect to resolve that here in the second quarter. We're getting towards the end, but we still expect a meaningful amount to come in under the legacy ILGBI claim. In terms of the overall free cash flow, we're we didn't change our guidance there. We reiterated Obviously, the, you know, whatever that business interruption is for the ILG should be a net positive.
And We'll continue to return capital to shareholders, not withstanding if there's some other item that we would look at to invest in. And, but, nothing's changed on our overall strategy about how we think about capital return.
Okay. Thank you. And then as I look at inventory, historically every year since the Marriott spin off, the inventory line item on your cash flow statement has been a positive number, which I believe effectively means your inventory spending is lower than your cost of goods sold. So my question here is, how long do you think that can continue? Is this a multi year runway of opportunity to repurchase seeded weeks from legacy owners?
And then can you just remind me what percent of your owner base today are still points owners, I'm sorry, still weeks owners versus points owners?
Yes, let me take the second half of that question. I'll let John go back on the first part. The of our legacy MVC owners, I want to this is going to be a swag, but I think it's directionally close. Around 40% of our legacy MVC owners are still weeks owners. Aergo 60 percent of the legacy MVC owners are points owners.
Now keep in mind, since 2010, we've been selling nothing but points. So over time, you would expect that percentage to shift as to the exit program, as you mentioned, people that have owned the product for 10, 15, 20 years, whatever it is. And for whatever reason, because of life event has decided that they don't want to own it anymore and we buy it back. So and when that happens, then we take inventory, we put it into our Florida based land trust and then we turn around and sell this point. So just doing that cadence, the percentage will continue to drop over time.
When that what that number finally becomes and all that, it's hard to it's hard to imagine. I would point out also that, in the the standard businesses. They had a very, very modest buyback program and we've begun to amp that up as you might imagine. We see that as an opportunity as well. Now, I'll let John take on the first part of the question, which was about the, whether how long the inventory replacement versus the inventory product cost thing on the balance sheet works.
So you have to take the different brands and products at this point kind of separately because you have different trust now that we're managing. So on the end, the larger Marriott, vacation owner, ShipTrust. We probably have a little bit of excess inventory in there. So there's always the ability to get a little bit of benefit. Within the Vistana, different trusts that we have, certain trusts like our Advent tourist product down in Mexico has multiple years.
But other trusts like the Westin Flex product is going to need inventory here in the near term. The Sheraton Trust has a little bit more. So what I'll say is this, we think, still some time here over the next year or 2 to continue to get more efficient on our balance sheet. And that's what we what we always strive to do. And as I've always said, the only caveat in any given year is the opportunities that we're looking at, right.
So we've been very, I think, successful managing on a capital efficient basis and not overspending on inventory. We expect to approach every new deal like that to kind of replace what we're selling off the shelf or spending less to burn it down. But For the right deal, if we can't get it done capital efficiently, we'll do it on balance sheet. We've done them on the past and still been able to get kind of that capital efficient done for the full year. So, probably a couple more years here of getting a little bit of benefit and we'll continue to update as we get further down the road.
And let me just add one other thing, Jared. We plan to do an Investor Day here in the fall. And I think we'll have an opportunity to give you some more visibility into, kind of the business on a multiyear basis going forward, which may be helpful in that regard as well.
Great. Thank you very much. One last one for me. Can you give us a sense as to, how much reportability will benefit the 2nd quarter and what we how we should think about the cadence really for the third quarter 4th quarter on the reportability line?
Sure. And the cadence actually for this year should be similar to what we saw last year, right, in terms of the when you think of it quarter to quarter, typically your first quarter has the most, unfavorable revenue reportability because when you think about December, it's a little bit more of a shoulder season between Thanksgiving and Christmas. So sales on an loop basis, it's not your strongest month. Those are the contract sales that get closed and get reported in the first quarter. Exiting the first quarter, March is a very strong month.
You're getting the benefit of spring break starting, sometimes the Easter holidays and all that. So you typically have month and typically stronger than March. So you'll continue to have probably, to a much lesser extent, negative reportability, in the second quarter. September starts to get a little bit slower. So you'll see you'll start to see a turnaround in the third quarter.
With some favorable reportability. And then the 4th quarter is when you're going to get the big influx because now you got a comparable year to year over year review. So, it's kind of the same revenue reportability. Nothing's changed on that from last year. It's just at times, depending on when the growth happens in the quarter and what happens at the end of the previous quarter, it can be a little bit guess harder to model.
And obviously one of the reasons we've always tried to stay away from giving quarterly guidance because of some of the timing issues. We look at it for the full year. And as you saw last year, we got great revenue reportability in the fourth quarter in our year end results.
Great. That's very helpful. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, we've reached the end of the question and answer session. Time, I'd like to turn the call back to Steve Weisz for closing comments.
Thanks, Ralph. I'm very excited with how we started the year with strong contract sales growth and adjusted EBITDA performance, but I'm even more excited about the opportunities that lie ahead for us in 2019 and beyond. I'm confident that the transformational changes for our shareholders for many years to come. Thank you for your time today and look forward to updating you on our progress on these many fronts in the coming quarters and finally, to everyone on the
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time.