Good day, and welcome to the Western Union first quarter 2019 results conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by 0. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mike Salop, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Andrew. On today's call, we will discuss the company's first quarter results and our full-year financial outlook, and then we will take your questions. The slides that accompany this call and webcast can be found at westernunion.com under the investor relations tab and will remain available after the call. Additional operational statistics have been provided in supplemental tables with our press release. Today's call is being recorded and our comments include forward-looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language in the earnings release and in Western Union's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the 2018 Form 10-K for additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. During the call, we will discuss some items that do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles.
We have reconciled those items to the most comparable GAAP measures on our website, westernunion.com, under the investor relations section. All statements made by Western Union officers on this call are the property of The Western Union Company and subject to copyright protection. Other than the replay noted in our press release, Western Union has not authorized and disclaims responsibility for any recording, replay, or distribution of any transcription of this call. I would now like to turn the call over to Hikmet Ersek.
Thank you, Mike, and good afternoon, everyone. Revenue trends were softer in the first quarter and industry growth appeared to slow, but we remain on track with our full-year expectations. We expect growth and margins to improve throughout the year as we gain traction with new opportunities such as Albertsons and Dollar General and face less challenging comparisons from currency and pricing actions in the prior year. The digital business continues to drive our results, with 19% transaction and constant currency revenue growth in the quarter for westernunion.com money transfer. Cross-border digital growth was much higher, but declines in the U.S. domestic money transfer business continue to affect both westernunion.com and overall C2C growth rates. Geographically, our U.S. outbound and U.S. to Mexico money transfer businesses delivered good results, and Latin America outbound remained strong.
Trends in Europe in certain countries were mixed. Middle East revenues continue to be affected by the price reductions implemented in the first half of last year. In Western Union Business Solutions, we achieved constant currency revenue growth for the third straight quarter, driven by strong growth in Asia Pacific and Europe. Overall, our core business expectations for the year have not changed from our original projections. We are not standing still. We are taking additional actions to improve our results going forward. In the next few days, we expect to complete the sale of our Speedpay U.S. domestic bill payment business for approximately $750 million. This represents the first step in our effort to streamline our model and focus on our core cross-border businesses. Our overarching strategies remain focused on driving digital expansion and growth, offering our cross-border platform to new business areas, and generating operating efficiencies.
With digital, in addition to westernunion.com and mobile geographic expansion, we continue to build our account payout network, including recent collaboration with mobile wallets in emerging markets around the world. Although this business is still relatively small, it is generating strong growth. We also continue to extend our payments platform and agent location network to allow customers to make payments for use cases such as e-commerce purchases. We are expanding into new pilot countries with Amazon and are also looking at other additional payment opportunities. Finally, we remain focused on generating operating efficiencies, including the implementation of lean management and other WU way-driven processes, which we are continuing to roll out across the company. With this streamlining of our business, we have identified additional opportunities to optimize our operating model and cost structure, which we are currently evaluating.
Our business has proven resilient regardless of the economic conditions. This initiative can give us more ways to drive stronger profitability in the future. We are working on specific plans and expect to have an investors day later this year where we will share our strategies, growth plans, and efficiency opportunities in more detail. Turning back to this year, we remain committed to generating and returning cash flow to shareholders. In the first quarter, we returned over $260 million through dividends and share repurchases. For the full year, we currently expect to spend $500 million-$600 million to buy back shares, which would put total return to shareholders, including dividends, at $850 million-$950 million for the year. We continue to generate strong cash flow. The Speedpay divestiture is near completion.
We expected revenue growth to start out slowly in the first quarter and improve throughout the year. We remain on track with our full-year business performance expectations. We are in the process of evaluating long-term efficiency initiatives that will enhance profitability in coming years. To give you more detail on the first quarter as well as the outlook and capital allocation plans, I would like to turn the call over to Raj.
Thank you, Hikmet. First quarter revenues of $1.3 billion declined 4% compared to the prior year period, while adjusted constant currency revenues, which excludes Speedpay revenues from both the current and prior year, increased 2%. Currency translation, net of the impact of hedges, reduced first quarter revenues by approximately $77 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to continued declines in the Argentine peso. The decline in peso negatively impacted total revenue by four percentage points, while the effect of inflation on our Argentina businesses is estimated to have positively impacted both reported and constant currency revenue by approximately two percentage points. In the consumer-to-consumer segment, which represented 79% of company revenues in the quarter, revenues declined 3% or were flat on a constant currency basis, while transactions grew 2%.
Total C2C cross-border principal increased 1% or 5% on a constant currency basis, while principal per transaction was down 2% or increased 2% constant currency. The spread between C2C transaction and revenue growth in the quarter was 5%, with a negative 3% impact from currency. Mix had a negative impact of approximately 2% in the quarter, while pricing was flat compared to the prior year period. Turning to the regional results, North America revenue grew 1% on a reported and constant currency basis, while transactions were flat. The U.S. to Mexico corridor delivered strong revenue growth in the quarter, driven by westernunion.com, and we made significant share gains based on the latest Banxico Mexico data through March. Our other U.S. outbound business also generated good revenue growth, driven by sends to Latin America and Asia.
Continued declines in the U.S. domestic money transfer business largely offset the U.S. outbound strength. In the Europe and CIS region, revenue declined 3% or increased 1% on a constant currency basis, with growth led by France and Spain, while transactions in the region increased 5%. Revenue in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia region declined 7% on a reported basis or 6% constant currency on transaction growth of 1% as last year's price reductions in the Middle East are still impacting revenue. The Latin America and Caribbean region continued to deliver strong constant currency revenue growth with very good growth from Ecuador, Mexico outbound, and Peru. Revenue in the region declined 2% or increased 12% constant currency while transactions grew 9%.
In the APAC region, revenue declined 13% or 11% constant currency and transactions were down 6%, with Australia, Korea, and New Zealand contributing to the revenue declines. westernunion.com again delivered strong growth in the quarter, driven by cross-border sends, which were partially offset by declines in the U.S. domestic business. Overall, westernunion.com revenue grew 17% or 19% constant currency on transaction growth of 19% and represented 13% of total C2C revenue in the quarter. Business Solutions revenues decreased 1% on a reported basis or increased 4% constant currency and represented 7% of company revenues in the quarter. Constant currency revenue growth was led by strength from hedging products and the education and financial institution verticals. Regionally, Business Solutions growth was driven by Asia Pacific and Europe. Other revenues, which consist primarily of our bill payments businesses, decreased 9% in the quarter.
Other revenues represented 14% of total company revenues in the quarter, with approximately half of the revenues related to the Speedpay business. The Pago Fácil walk-in business in Argentina continued to grow transactions and local currency revenue, but declined in US dollar terms, and Speedpay revenue also decreased in the quarter. The depreciation of the Argentine peso negatively impacted other reported revenue by 20 percentage points in the quarter, while Argentina inflation is estimated to have positively impacted other revenues by approximately 11 percentage points. Turning to margins and profitability, we will focus on consolidated margins as segment margins have not been adjusted for the expected reallocation of corporate overhead expenses anticipated after the divestiture of the Speedpay business in the second quarter. The consolidated operating margin was 18.8% in the quarter compared to 19.1% in the prior year period, with a decline due to higher acquisition and divestiture-related expenses.
Foreign exchange hedges provided a benefit of $5 million in the current quarter compared to a negative impact of $9 million in the prior year period. EBITDA margin was 23.6% in the first quarter, which compared to 23.9% in the prior year. The GAAP effective tax rate was 19.9% in the quarter compared to 8.9% in the prior year period, or 11.4% in the prior year period adjusted for changes in Tax Act provisional accounting. Last year's first quarter rates benefited from certain discrete items, while this quarter's rate reflects the impact of new full-year expectations related to the Speedpay transaction, which I will detail when I discuss the 2019 outlook. GAAP earnings per share in the quarter was $0.39 compared to $0.46 in the prior year period.
The decrease was primarily due to lower revenues and increase in acquisition and divestiture-related expenses, and a higher effective tax rate, partially offset by fewer shares outstanding. Turning to our cash flow and balance sheet. Cash flow from operating activities was $240 million for the quarter. Capital expenditures in the quarter were approximately $38 million. At the end of the quarter, we had cash of $833 million and debt of $3.4 billion. We returned $262 million to shareholders in the first quarter, including $87 million in dividends and $175 million of share repurchases, which represented approximately 10 million shares. The outstanding share count at quarter end was 433 million shares, and we had $1.369 billion remaining under our existing and new share repurchase authorizations, the majority of which expires in December 2021. Before I turn to the updated financial outlook, I want to provide some details on the Speedpay transaction.
We expect to complete this transaction in the coming days for approximately $750 million in cash. As a reminder, Speedpay generated $350 million in revenue in 2018 and approximately $100 million of carve-out operating income, which excludes corporate allocations to the business. Separately, we have completed the sale of our Paymap Mortgage Payments services business, which was also in other in the second quarter. This business had approximately $15 million in revenue last year. From an income statement standpoint, the sale of Speedpay business is expected to generate a pre-tax gain of approximately $530 million in the second quarter. We expect taxes on the transactions of approximately $150 million, reflecting the fact that the Speedpay tax gain is considerably higher than the book gain, and also reflecting a $15 million tax benefit from the Paymap sale.
In addition, the Speedpay gain produces a favorable effect on our overall U.S. tax position with respect to the BEAT provision in 2019, resulting in a separate tax benefit of approximately $40 million compared to our previous outlook. We currently expect to use the approximately $600 million in after-tax cash proceeds available from the Speedpay and Paymap transactions for a combination of share repurchase and net debt reduction over the next 12 months, with slightly more than half currently planned for share repurchase. From an earnings per share perspective, we expect the dilution from the lost income related to Speedpay, net of additional share repurchases and lower net interest expense, to be approximately $0.10 per share for both 2019 and 2020.
This reflects about four and a half months of Speedpay and Paymap income in 2019 and no income from these businesses in 2020, which is being offset compared to 2019 by the impact of additional share repurchases and lower interest expense. The after-tax gain on the sales and the BEAT tax benefit generate an approximately $0.94 benefit to the 2019 earnings per share, which is net of approximately $0.02 for acquisition and divestiture-related costs. The total impact of all divestiture-related items is approximately $0.84 accretion this year. Turning to our full financial outlook. We now expect GAAP revenues for the full year to decrease mid-single digits due to the removal of a partial year of the Speedpay business. On an adjusted constant currency basis, excluding Speedpay from both years, our outlook is unchanged as we continue to expect a low single-digit constant currency revenue increase.
Operating margins are expected to be approximately 20%, in line with our original outlook. Although the removal of Speedpay carve-out profits does have a negative impact on margins, our outlook still projects to approximately 20%. We expect an effective tax rate of approximately 18%-19% in 2019, which increased from the previous range of 17%-18%. The increase in the GAAP outlook rate reflects the impact of tax on the gain on Speedpay sale, partially offset by favorable changes in the company's U.S. tax position with regards to the BEAT provision. We currently expect the effective tax rate in 2020 to be in the mid-teens range. GAAP EPS in 2019 is now expected to be in a range of $2.66-$2.76, which includes the approximately $0.94 of non-recurring net benefits and approximately $0.10 of ongoing dilution from the divestitures.
GAAP cash flow from operating activities for 2019 is expected to be approximately $850 million, which is net of the taxes paid on the Speedpay and Paymap sales. From an accounting perspective, the proceeds from sales are classified as investing activities on our cash flow statement, while the taxes on the net gains are classified as operating activities. Excluding these taxes and the BEAT benefit, operating cash flow is expected to be approximately $950 million, which is adjusted from our previous outlook of approximately $1 billion to reflect the removal of a partial year of Speedpay cash flow. As mentioned earlier, we currently expect to spend between $500 million and $600 million on share repurchases in 2019 and a similar amount in 2020. To summarize the quarter, our business results were stable, although we faced currency headwinds and a difficult year-over-year growth comparisons.
We continue to generate strong, solid cash flow and return significant capital to shareholders through dividends and repurchases. Our full-year outlooks have been updated primarily to reflect the Speedpay divestiture, but basic business trends are still expected to be in line with our original outlook. Operator, we are now ready to take questions.
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Bryan Keane of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, guys.
Hey, Bryan.
Wanted to just ask about pricing. I know you guys did some pricing actions in North America and the Middle East. It looks like transaction growth dropped a little bit. Usually, you see the opposite effect. You see with pricing, you see an increase in transactions. Overall transactions was, I think, 2% for the quarter down from 4% last quarter. Just trying to figure out what was the impact from pricing. Did you guys get the impact you expected? How much of this is just a little bit of the difficulty going on in the economies worldwide?
Yeah, Bryan, this is Raj. Let me start off. In the Middle East, most of what you're seeing on the revenue side is related to price reductions we made in the second quarter of last year. Transactions did fall off a little bit, but there are a number of different things happening in that region, Middle East and Africa. The revenue was a little bit better in some of the key markets like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. We also had a little bit of softness both in transactions and revenue trends in our Africa outbound business. Just some of the markets there are being impacted by hard currency shortages. We're just trying to manage through that. There's some opposite impacts that are impacting the business.
We do believe that the trends will improve as we go past the second quarter, just as we anniversary some of the price reductions there. In North America, there was a little bit of price optimization or increases that I would say in the quarter, but nothing material there to really talk about. The domestic money transfer trends, the transactions there are a little bit worse, even though revenue trends were probably similar to the fourth quarter. That could be some of it where the DMT business is really dragging down the results in North America.
Okay, I got it. I think Hikmet, you talked about an Analyst Day towards the end of this year and talking about some long-term initiatives maybe. Could you just give us maybe a preview of some of the things that you're thinking about for that Analyst Day and how you guys might talk about some of these long-term initiatives for the business funnel?
Sure. Yeah, we are excited about coming up to Investors Day because we believe that we have an exciting story to tell. We are currently working on it. We are really looking at our business model, which we can use more technology and more artificial intelligence, which we have already. It's not additional investment. We can optimize our current organization and running this business more efficiently. Starting from variable cost to fixed cost, we are looking at that. At the same time, for the revenue expansion possibilities like digital expansion and really offering our platform, which is unique offering cross-border solutions to new payments providers. That's the story basically. We are currently really evaluating what the outcome will be.
We have the first internal plans, but we are really going on the detail, and we would like to share that with our investors on the Investors Day coming up probably end of September or October term, end of Q3 or beginning of October.
Okay, great. Thanks for taking the questions.
Thank you.
Thanks, Bryan.
The next question comes from Jason Kupferberg of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.
Hey, thanks, guys. I just wanted to ask actually a follow-up there just in terms of some of these newer initiatives that you're going to talk more about later in the year. Just wanted to get your viewpoint on why now? Why is this the right time? It doesn't seem like WU Way was that long ago. Seemed like that was a successful effort. Is this about kind of taking WU Way to the next level? Just wanted to get a sense of why this is the right point in time to take another cut at efficiency initiatives.
I think, Jason, that's an excellent question. Why now? As you look at our business till 2016, we really were investing a lot on the compliance programs, on the anti-money laundering efficiencies, on the technology. Since end of 2016, 2017, which we have much more stable results. The resilience of our business give us confidence that we can run this business in a much more efficient way. We do have licenses in 200 countries. We have invested in the technology parts. Now it's really the reorganization. In the past, we were all about expanding globally. We are in 200 countries, where the other competitors are still struggling expanding globally. We have been already there for many years. Now we are really looking at how we can offer our global platform to new partners. We can do that in a much more efficient way with artificial intelligence.
We've been working with our teams the last few weeks, actually not few weeks, I would say the last 6 weeks in a very detailed strategy plan. We would like to take that to a more detailed plan and present that to the shareholders. We believe that this could go to a margin expansion that could be in a much more better margins here because it's changing the business model from a distribution business model more on a customer-oriented business model. Gaining more consumers and having consumers more in our digital way will give us efficiencies. For instance, dropping money on an account, it's much more efficient than dropping money in a location because of the commissions, and we could gain there also more traction, and there is a plan behind that. We would like to share that. Does it make sense?
Yeah. No, that does make sense. Maybe just shifting gears, maybe one for Raj, just on the guidance side. I think on an adjusted constant currency basis, excluding the Argentinian inflation benefits, we need to get from 0% in Q1 to the unchanged full-year guide of 2%. Can you kind of give us that walk of the pieces, how we get there? I know the comps do get easier. You talked about Albertsons and Dollar General. Can you maybe quantify how much they may benefit the top line during the rest of the year?
Yeah, it's all the pieces that you mentioned, Jason. We had a tougher comparison to Q1 of last year. We also had a slightly negative calendar impact in Q1, which will alleviate itself as we move through the course of the year. Albertsons is now fully ramped up. That gives us an incremental 1,000 locations. Dollar General is now also fully ramped up and will contribute more. We are adding about 14,000 locations with them. We don't quantify the exact impact of each one, but they're certainly going to be contributors. We are also going to be expanding some digital partnerships later this year that will also add to the overall picture. We feel confident about the full-year outlook, even though Q1 is a little bit softer.
Okay. I'm sorry, just one last quick one. On wu.com, I know you slowed to 19%, but you did call out DMT as a headwind. How could we think about maybe the wu.com number ex DMT? I'm just trying to see if there's any underlying change in the trend. Thanks.
Yeah. We grew 19% all in. We haven't given that number specifically. We would be in the mid 20% range if we took DMT out of the wu.com number.
Overall, I think Raj will remain. In 2018, our DMT business was 8% of our revenue.
Which is our consumer revenue.
Consumer revenue.
Yes. Exactly.
Of our consumer revenue. Jason, as you recall, we didn't give that. We said that we are not disclosing in the future, but it's declining and has an impact to our total number. Cross-border has still healthy, very healthy growth rates.
Yeah. The international cross-border is really growing at the strongest level in .com. We're getting pretty good growth in our U.S. outbound business, and the DMT part of digital is declining.
Okay. Terrific. Thank you for the color.
Sure.
The next question comes from Tien-tsin Huang of J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thanks. Good afternoon. I'll ask similar to Jason on margins for the year, though. Starting at 18.8%, you mentioned Speedpay removal, I think is dilutive. Still guiding 20%. I guess with revenue improving, you'll see some margin lift, but what other levers do you have to get the margins higher in the balance of the year?
Yeah. Hi, Tien-tsin. This is Raj. We also had some acquisition and divesture-related expenses in Q1 that we called out, that's not necessarily representative of every quarter, so that will help a bit. The revenue lift that we get the rest of the year will absolutely help on the margin expansion. With the Speedpay divesture, coming into the year, we had about 20% margin outlook, we're still at 20% because even though Speedpay is a bit negative it could be a little bit above or a little bit below the 20% number. Still confident that we're going to make the full year. The revenue growth will help a lot, and our expense base should be relatively stable as we move through the course of the year. That's why we have confidence around that 20% number.
Okay. Thanks for that. Just a quick follow-up. Advertising. I've noticed a lot of the pay-to-account advertising, even on TV. Was that reflected mostly in Q1? Could we see more of an advertising impact for the balance of the year? I'm curious what kind of payback you might expect from something like this, if it's a change from before.
Yeah. On the marketing advertising front, we're likely to have a little bit higher spending in the first half of the year than the second half. Second quarter is typically a higher spending quarter just given Mother's Day and other things. That's roughly what we expect.
On the Tien-tsin, on the account payouts, I think it's one of our strongest growing. It's still small, of course, but strongest growing channel. People are using more and more for account payout. If you use your mobile app, you can choose between cash payout or mobile payout. There are also price differences to animate the customers. It's growing very well. Transactions and revenues are growing very well. We are advertising, especially some certain corridors like India, it's definitely something that's growing fast. Also from Europe, people are using more and more account payouts. That long term also helps on our agent commission structure because of the mix. I think I'm excited about that. We currently have about 4 billion accounts worldwide which can drop money directly, and we are very much pushing that also to optimize our revenue growth and our commission structure.
Yeah. No, it makes sense to advertise it. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
The next question comes from Darrin Peller of Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.
Thanks, guys. Let me just start off. When I think about strategically the DMT, the domestic business, again, just revisiting, is there anything you guys could do to— first of all, how profitable is that for you right now? Have you disclosed how much that contributes to earnings? And then is there anything you can do similar to what you've done with Speedpay? Would it make sense in someone else's hands? I know it's declining, but still potentially cash generative for someone. And then, I guess take it a step further, is there any other ways to enhance the business model in terms of specifically C2C digital beyond just the organic trends you're seeing with capital brought in from Speedpay and others? Should you buy someone else? Does that become a greater priority? Thanks, guys.
Yeah. On the profitability of DMT, we haven't really disclosed that, but it's a very profitable business for us. It probably generates more profitability than its size. We haven't really gone into the actual specifics of that. Selling DMT would be challenging because it's so integral to everything that we have. I think that's what your question was, Darrin. We have DMT customers that are also international money transfer customers and vice versa.
Also, one of the big advantages of DMT is the cash payout. We have certain customers, they use DMT, our U.S. DMT, send money via mobile, but pay out in cash in minutes, and that's unique. That customer is existing. However, the competitors like Zelle and Venmo having zero fees on a direct-to-direct account, that's where we feel the competition, and it's hard to compete against zero fee.
Sure.
I think that we are really looking at these customers we currently have. It's high profitable business, and we are serving this customer in a best way like we do serve U.S. outbound customers.
Darrin, can you just repeat your last question? There was a third question around C2C digital and acquisition opportunities.
I guess I was just wondering if there's any other use of capital around some of the proceeds from Speedpay. I know you talked about debt pay down and buybacks, but have you raised in priority any type of tuck-ins that could help expedite some of the growth profiles from your businesses?
Yeah. Our going-in plan is to buy back stock, as we articulated, but we also are always looking for acquisition opportunities, whether it's digital or something else.
Let me just give a shot on that. We do look at M&A opportunities given the business. We are not standing still given the operating performance a little bit flat. We are really looking for M&A opportunities also which will continue to get additional revenue to our cross-border engine. Of course, it has to be right price, right strategic fit, and that's what we are doing, and we are really evaluating. Now we can do these things since we feel much better with our platform. As I mentioned earlier at the call, as we have now the operating efficiencies and we are looking for operating efficiencies, I think we can also, when we go to the market, we can include new revenue streams to our engine much better than we did it in the past.
I think having an efficient cross-border engine will allow us to be more active on the M&A front.
Okay. Thanks. Just one last follow-up, it's around the Amazon news that we had seen from you guys a couple of quarters ago, we thought was pretty promising. Have there been any other marketplaces like that where you could use your network for bigger and better things than even what you're doing today?
On Amazon, first of all, we are expanding with Amazon together the countries we are in. I think there will be hopefully some recent announcements our shareholders will like. I will like it and our shareholders and Amazon Europe partner like to serve new customers. Collecting funds in the local currency, turning that to a dollar immediately, which is that so you can buy globally, pay locally, it's enormous. We are looking also for other partners and more announcements come on that. We have our own division called Cross-Border Solutions Division, which is a sales organization which offers our platform to big partners, and it's all about closing that and expanding Amazon but also signing new partners.
Okay, great. Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
Thanks, Darrin.
The next question comes from James Schneider of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Hi, Jim.
Good afternoon. Hi, how are you? Good afternoon.
Yes.
Thanks for taking my question. I guess just maybe at a 50,000-foot level, can you maybe kind of give us a sense regarding the divestitures and the M&A you're contemplating, where you want to take the company in, say, two years from a business mix perspective? Is the thought that you want to be just a much more larger-scale C2C business with a lot more digital exposure and maybe less B2B exposure? Or how are you thinking about kind of the direction the company is going to go in given what you've done with Speedpay and what you might be contemplating elsewhere?
Excellent question, Jim. That is why we want to have the Investors Day to go more deep on that. Let me try to give you a high-level thinking behind that. Over the years, we created that cross-border engine, we call it cross-border platform, which allows us to settle 137 currencies in minutes and offer that really now not only to Western Union customers, which are the C2C customers, really offering also that to C2B and B2C customers. That platform is unique. Not everybody has that. We have in 200 countries licensed. We have compliance programs which is driven by artificial intelligence. We have a technology which is really unique, and putting that all in one platform, putting that in a cloud, that is something we are doing currently.
With that, Amazon is only one example to go out of our C2C customer, really using a third brand, which is the Amazon by code, and offering our platform to Amazon so the customers worldwide are able to shop Amazon online. These are kind of things which I am trying to take the company to the next level. C2B, B2C, and C2C is definitely something in our heart. Another example is, Jim, you know it, we talked a little bit is the university pay. The student pay product is basically acquiring universities. People can globally pay their fees locally and study in another country. An example, there are about 200,000 Chinese students only in Spain. We can offer that. People pay in local currency and can study in Madrid or Barcelona immediately and get their visas to go abroad.
These kind of things are definitely something we are looking at that it is not only Western Union branded products, C2C products, but also other verticals to offer our platform.
That is helpful. Thank you. Maybe just as a follow-up, aside from the macro pressures you are seeing in any of the corridors, can you maybe talk about whether you think the bigger impact on some of the transaction deceleration you have seen is more due to things like the hard currency shortages, et cetera, or is there any kind of change in migratory trends that is really driving that weakness as well? Thank you.
Well, just generally, Jim, our cross-border business is healthy, as I mentioned, as Raj mentioned earlier. We really believe on our country to country pairs, we are healthy. We do have some softness in the Middle East. We have some softness in some part of Europe. Generally, I would say that our U.S. outbound business, which is a major business, and European Union outbound like France and Germany, has been doing very good results. Even in Saudi Arabia and UAE, we see some, if you put the pricing to side, some improvements in the recent quarters. I would say that the impact is really the U.S. domestic money transfer business has impact to our business from transaction-wise. We always say that our competency is in cross-border, cross-currency, and that's where we are focused, and I feel resilient also. We don't see big pricing pressures.
The prices are stable in cross-border, cross-currency. I think that operating in 200 countries, serving more than 20,000 corridors, it's really a competitive advantage.
I mean, the remittance principal growth based on the World Bank data, Jim, is a little bit slower this year than it was the last couple of years. That may be some of it overall in terms of overall market. It is expected to keep growing in that low to mid-single digit range in terms of principal growth, cross-border principal.
Yeah.
The market dynamics should continue to be okay. A little bit softer this year, but should improve.
I think it's softer. I think also competitors give some numbers. Their numbers were also softer. Generally, I would say still a healthy business.
Thank you.
Sure.
The next question comes from Ashwin Shirvaikar of Citi. Please go ahead.
Hi, Hikmet. Hi, Raj.
Hi. How are you?
How are you?
Good. Thanks. I hope the same for you. My first question is with regards to U.S. domestic money transfer trends, kind of worse. The reason I am asking is given the backdrop of a higher number of agent locations, because you have been adding agent locations, what is going on at that level? Is it just it takes time for agent locations to get more productive? Because then that is a broader question, too, because over the last couple of years, you guys have added a number of locations. wu.com is in more countries, but your growth rate has not necessarily accelerated. How should we think of that?
Well, first of all, let me start with the agent locations. The recent agent locations, the Albertsons and Dollar General just has been added, Ashwin, a few months ago. Activation of them takes time. We know that especially on the strategic areas like you add location, it does bring more transactions. That is from the send side. On the receive side, having 550,000 locations globally is a big advantage, Ashwin. You can use your phone and send money directly to 550,000 locations in $, and we turn that in Vietnam or in Chile or in Finland immediately to their local currency. Not many companies can do that. Being present in that countries in last mile is the biggest advantage. That is why we are paying out in 137 currencies. Not many companies can do that. That will be. On the new expansion of westernunion.com, yes, it takes time.
Our growth basically comes from U.S. and from European Union outbound. As you recall, we were first in U.S. a few years ago, then expanded to European Union. Now we are all over the European Union. We recently, I was just last week in the Gulf States in Middle East. We opened seven new countries there to outbound business, especially I am excited about the sending money to South Asia. Since the promotion, we know that we signed many new customers on our mobile apps, on the westernunion.com mobile apps. It will take some time. But the 19% growth on .com, it's a very healthy growth if you compare it few years ago and where we are. We end this year more than $500 million of revenue in .com business, and it's still growing by 20%. The base is much larger, and we are still growing with 20%.
It's a quite good success story, I guess.
Right. No, I was thinking of it within the context of your overall business. The second question, quite different from the first is, in terms of how much was the acquisition and divestiture expense in 1Q? In other words, what's a normalized EPS for 1Q? And if you could also provide what compliance expense came in at for the quarter and for the expectation for the year.
Ashwin, we didn't break out, but just think about the annual outlook. We said that we expected about $0.02 worth of impact from acquisition and divestiture-related expenses. Obviously, that could change depending on the level of activity, but that's what we've currently assumed. That should give you a sense of how much that could be for the year. From a compliance standpoint, I would say, the costs were relatively consistent. We haven't broken that out, but we've been able to stabilize our compliance costs over the last couple of years, nothing specific to call out there.
Okay. Understood. Thank you, guys.
Sure.
You're welcome.
The next question comes from Ramsey El-Assal of Barclays. Please go ahead.
Hey, guys. This is Benjamin Budish on for Ramsey. I wanted to ask about another question on your operating margin. Maybe this is something best left for the investor day. Talking about some of your longer-term efficiency initiatives and with the growth in the wu.com business, is there a path there to getting the operating margin back into the mid-20s, or is that more dependent on some re-acceleration in your revenue growth?
Yeah. I think it's something we should probably save for later in the next few months, and certainly Investor Day will give you more color on some of our initiatives. We're going through the process right now, I would say, in identifying how much opportunity there is and what we can take to the bottom line, right? In past exercises, we've sort of reinvested the money to drive growth, but we also are looking for ways to drive more efficiencies, ultimately better margins. We still are going through that process to evaluate how much that could be.
Okay. Fair enough. If I could ask one more. Just on your APAC business, could you maybe give a little more color on what you're doing tactically to turn that business around?
Yeah. Asia Pacific is certainly a focus area for us. The good thing is that it's only 6% of its consumer revenues, and so it is relatively well contained. The negative trends in the quarter were driven by Australia, Korea, and New Zealand, and each market has different issues associated with it. Some are more competitive in nature, some are more just economy-related. Digital continues to be a heavy push in the Asia Pacific market. Right now, digital for us is only about 11% of the total Asia Pacific market, and we want to drive that to be a much bigger number over the next few years, because that is the way the market is heading. Having more mobile capabilities, more account funding, more account payout, and having more of those kinds of capabilities.
These are some longer-term things that we're trying to do, and we're also trying to tactically fix things on a short-term basis as well.
On Asia Pacific, the most of the market is a receiving market. Few markets like Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia are outbound markets. If you look at total Asia, most of the Southeast Asia, China, and India are receiving markets. It's very much dependent on how we send money to this country. The other thing is also, we do have some challenges, as you said, in Australia and in New Zealand with our retail, but the .com business and the digital business is doing pretty well there.
Okay. That's a great color. Thanks so much.
Sure.
The next question comes from James Faucette of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much. Most of my near-term question has been answered, I did want to ask a modeling question and a more strategic operational question. The first is, with the sale of the Speedpay business, is there any seasonality that we should be aware of, or being that we should incorporate into our forecast and models?
I wouldn't expect seasonality. Do we have anything, Mike, that we're aware of seasonality?
Actually, the tables of the company, our press release, we actually have the Speedpay by quarter pro forma for last year.
Okay, great.
factor that.
Yeah, I missed that. Okay, thank you. My second question is your comments on using implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning, et cetera, to improve, among other things, AML and KYC requirements. How do you think about its ability to not only help you maintain compliance, but then ultimately bring down costs potentially as far as maintaining AML and KYC compliance? Is that a possibility or do you feel like you're probably going to just It's just a new avenue of investment to be able to maintain your capabilities there?
No, it's the first part, actually. It's definitely we have it and we use it and we want to expand it. Currently, we use a lot of artificial intelligence, especially in our compliance programs, Know Your Customer environment, the transactions monitoring. That helps us a lot on our compliance programs and which we advanced since we start to invest heavily here. We have also a good team who really knows that very well. It is the existing artificial intelligence, but we could use this also in other parts of the company. Is it dynamic pricing, for instance, like an airliner? All these things that we really think that we could do. We think that we could have some revenue opportunities there. Also using the technology, artificial intelligence will give us have a better access to form associates, communicate them in a better way.
As you recall that we have about 550,000 locations. Let's say two times of them is through formal associate per location are about 1 million people promoting Western Union daily, right? How do we communicate with them in a very efficient way? All these things are something that we would like to share during our Investors' Day. That's exactly what Raj mentioned earlier. That's exactly what we are planning and putting together all these things to give you a more better outline for our future growth and future efficiencies.
Great. Thank you so much.
The next question comes from David Scharf of JMP Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Two of them. First off, Hikmet, I believe in your prepared remarks you specifically called out your belief that you experienced market share gains in U.S. to Mexico that may have been triangulated from Banco de México data.
Yes.
Can you expand on that a bit?
It was wrong, but I'll take it. It's good news. Yeah, Banco de México data shows that we are gaining market share. Yes.
Got it. Is there any magnitude you are able to articulate or any internal sense of where that share may have come from or if it was broad-based in terms of competitors?
As you recall that we invested on our network there. The last two years we did a lot. We had OXXO, we had other kind of locations. One of the big changes also, we start to do our APN network, which means Account Payout Network. That shows really good growth rates in account payout. Also, dot-com business to Mexico has good results, the digital growth. These are the things that helps us to gain market share. By the way, as you recall also, we have three brands there. We have Orlandi Valuta and Vigo additional to our Western Union brand. We adapt our products to the customer needs. That helps definitely also to gain market share on this specific corridor.
Got it. Understood. As a follow-up, I believe in response to one of the questions about sort of the expected ramp-up of revenue throughout the year, more back-ended, among other things you highlighted some of the additions like Albertsons and Dollar General. I am wondering, when we think about a big grocery chain like Albertsons, kind of a regional/national chain, when we look at things like a Safeway or a Kroger, other examples, what is typically the transaction profile out of big grocers? Is the bulk of it domestic money transfer? Is most of it outbound? Just trying to get a sense for, in addition to how that helps the top line, sort of what it means in terms of profitability per transaction.
If you look at our business, I mean, U.S. outbound business is huge, right? I mean, we like U.S. outbound business, sending money from U.S. to 200 countries in minutes. I think nobody can beat our way. We have a lot of competitors that we are competing daily on the markets. I think during that environment, we are doing pretty well, a good job. Agents like our product. Most of our agents on send side have been with us more than 17 years, Mike?
20 years.
20 years already. 20 years. They like our product because they bring customers in their locations, and the customers are from migrant population from different countries. At the same time, also people, you want to send money and support their loved ones globally.
Raj?
Bringing a product.
Right. Yeah, I might have misspoke. I guess what I was trying to understand is the grocery vertical, in particular in Albertsons, as we compare it to like a Kroger.
It's probably a representative customer set from the rest of our business. It's not unique in nature from a grocery store chain standpoint.
Because U.S. outbound is such a large business, you're going to have more customers doing that than the domestic part of the business. It's going to be a mix, and it's going to probably depend on where some stores are located and which neighborhoods, and those kinds of things will have an impact on the kind of customer base that you have within a store.
Got it. Okay. Thank you, Raj.
Sure.
The next question comes from Jeff Cantwell of Guggenheim Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for squeezing me in.
Hi.
This is Raj. Hi. Your launch of digital in the Middle East, I believe you launched digital in 7 countries last week. Can you just tell us a little more about that and maybe just give us a general feel? Not that we're asking you to preempt your Investor Day, but it just seems like your Asia digital strategy you've been pursuing over the past 12 months, now your Middle East digital launch just sounds like a possible shift towards more top-line growth given how large those TAMs are. Is there anything you can tell us about the magnitude of the opportunity you see there? Any color around timing and size of revenue impact to the extent you're able to today would be great. Thanks.
Generally, as you recall, just from strategy point of view, the digital customers are new to our network. Still, 80% of our wu.com users are new to our network. They didn't use the last 12 months Western Union. We are really getting additional customer segmentation, not the retail customer. They want to use the digital one. Putting that aside for a minute, we've been now in 70 countries. Our Middle East strategy, Asia strategy is the same like we did it in Europe for years to opening countries. We've been now in 70 countries, sending capabilities to 200 countries. We can drop money in 200 countries in a location, or you can send money to one of the 4 billion accounts we serve globally. This is a huge advantage. In the Middle East, where I was recently, there the 7 countries, they are Gulf countries.
They are outbound countries, where they have a big migrant population. These people are also started to have credit cards and accounts which you can allow them to send money from their account, from their credit card directly to 200 countries, not carrying cash to a location. We believe it's a huge opportunity going forward. It will take some time. We know that the wu.com customers take some time until you acquire them, but then once they start to use them, they use it more often than retail. If you look at our growth rates, as I mentioned to Ashwin earlier, we've been growing around 20% over the years right now, and our base was much smaller on wu.com. Now our base is over half a billion dollar revenue, and we are still growing by 20%.
That's a part of the global expansion, and part of is that return customers on the existing countries.
Thanks very much.
Okay. Andrew, we'll take the final question.
Okay, that question will come from Vasundhara Govil of KBW. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I guess the first one I had was for Raj. Just wanted a clarification on the EPS guide for the year. I think if you exclude the $0.84 impact that you called out from the divestitures, it seems like the underlying guide is going down a couple pennies. Just wanted to understand what was driving that and if that's the right way to look at it.
Yeah, I wouldn't give that too much weight. The only real change is the divestiture impact. That's what we tried to isolate. Otherwise, outlook for the year really has not changed. When you look at the top-line outlook is low single digit constant currency, the same as it was before, and margins are still approximately 20%. The range itself is a little bit tighter. It all depends on the level of revenue, the level of expenses, the tax rates that we actually will have, timing of repurchases, all those things can have an impact. We've just tightened the range a little bit, but we still feel good about the overall outlook and no material changes other than the divestiture-related impacts that we tried to call out.
Got it. That's very helpful. I guess the second question, not to beat a dead horse, but just on the slowdown in the westernunion.com channel. I know you guys called out the slowdown in the domestic money transfer business, but could you sort of help us with how much it got worse during this quarter? Because just the magnitude of, I guess, decline in transaction growth would imply that the domestic quarter got materially worse this quarter versus last.
No, I wouldn't look at it that way. The DMT business transactions did get a little bit worse. However, the other parts of the business, the international parts continue to grow very strongly, and that's where a lot of our expansion focus is. Our U.S. outbound business slowed a little bit, but it still had very strong growth. On the domestic side, I would say the revenues were still relatively stable to the last quarter. Transactions were a little bit worse. We still really feel good about the dotcom business and the growth opportunities, and we ultimately want to be in 200 countries and territories over the next few years and with multiple different channels. Nothing has really changed from our strategic outlook on the dotcom business.
Yeah. Vasu, I'd just add, as Hikmet mentioned, DMT is 8% of our C2C revenues, within wu.com, DMT is actually a higher percentage of those revenues.
Got it. That's helpful. Thank you very much.
Sure.
Okay, thanks everyone for joining our call today. You have a good afternoon.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.